The present invention relates to artificial limb sockets and, more specifically, to a system and method for creating sockets with variable hardness for an improved custom fit.
The major component of the interface between the residual (remaining) limb of an amputee and their prosthetic device is called the socket. The socket bears the weight of the body of the user and distributes the load across the prosthesis. Because the shape and structure of each residual limb varies between patients, every socket must be custom made by a certified and licensed practitioner so that it properly fits a patient. Despite the customization of sockets by professionals, traditional prosthetic socket manufacturing does not always allow for the proper distribution of pressure between the residual limb and the prosthetic device. As a result, a poorly designed socket does not distribute pressure properly and will often cause pain or injuries. Additionally, current methods of manufacturing prosthetics are expensive and labor intensive. Accordingly, there is a need in the art for a system and method of designing and manufacturing prosthetic device sockets that improve the fit of the socket while reducing the time and expense associated with manufacturing the improved socket.
The present invention comprises a system and method of producing a prosthetic limb socket using computer-aided design (CAD), computer-aided engineering (CAE), and computer assisted manufacturing (CAM) so that prosthetic practitioners (prosthetists) can design and manufacture custom flexible inner prosthetic supports that better interface with individual amputees and more evenly distribute pressure. More specifically, a system for producing a prosthetic socket according to the present invention includes a data acquisition module configured to form a digital representation of a residual limb from an input of patient data, a computer design module configured to create a digital model of a prosthetic socket having an internal structure based on the digital representation of the residual limb and to allow a user to modify the digital model to adjust the internal structure to change at least a portion of the internal structure of the digital model, and print conversion module associated with the computer design module that is configured to receive the modified digital model from the computer design module and convert the modified digital model into instructions for a manufacturing device. The invention may further comprise a manufacturing device, such as computer-assisted manufacturing machine, that is associated with the print conversion module for receiving the converted modified digital model and for forming a prosthetic socket that corresponds to the modified digital model. The data acquisition module may be configured to receive the input of patient data from a three-dimensional scanner used to take a three-dimensional scan of the residual limb or a three-dimensional scan of a cast of the residual limb. The data acquisition module may also be configured to receive the input of patient data from a practitioner that has measured the residual limb. The computer design module may comprise computer aided design software, and the computer design module may be G-code software.
The present invention also includes a method of producing a prosthetic socket, comprising the steps of acquiring data representing coordinates of a residual limb, forming a digital representation of the residual limb based on the acquired data, creating a digital model of a prosthetic socket having in internal structure based on the digital representation of the residual limb, allowing modifications to the digital model to adjust the internal structure to change at least a portion of the internal structure of the digital model, and converting the modified digital model into instructions for a manufacturing device. The method may additionally include the step of forming an actual prosthetic socket that corresponds to the modified digital model.
The present invention will be more fully understood and appreciated by reading the following Detailed Description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Referring to the figures, wherein like numerals refer to like parts throughout, there is seen in
System 10 further comprises a computer design module 18 interconnected to data acquisition module 12 and configured to receive the shapefile once is has been generated. Computer design module 18 may comprise CAD/CAE software that is configured for the present invention. More specifically, computer design module 18 is programmed to display the shapefile for the practitioner and allow the practitioner to enter a desired offset (distance between the residual limb and flexible inner socket) and thickness defining a flexible inner socket 20 as seen in
System 10 further comprises a print conversion module 30 interconnected to computer design module 18 and configured to receive the customized digital shape file. Print conversion module 30 is programmed to convert the digital shapefile into an appropriate file format for computer-assisted manufacturing or three-dimensional (3D) printing. For example, print conversion module 30 may be programmed to convert digital shape file into G-code, a conventional language used to determine the optimal settings of a computer-assisted manufacturing (CAM) machine (or 3D printer). The printing file format, such G-code, is used to determine the extrusion material temperature of the particular machine, the extrusion rate/speed, the build plate temperature, and the tool path (movement of the extruder to form the shape and internal architecture structure of the socket). Print conversion module 30 thus translates the customized shapefile into the corresponding instructions for manufacturing a socket based on the customized shapefile. This process is frequently referred to as slicing and involves the translation of 3D models into instructions that a 3D printer can understand and can be optimized to the particular 3D printer to be used.
System 10 additionally comprises a CAM machine 32 associated with print conversion module 30 that is configured to manufacture a socket based on the customized shapefile that has been converted into the appropriate language for CAM machine 32 by conversion module 30. For example, CAM machine 32 may use the G-Code produced by print conversion module 30 to fabricate a flexible inner socket as designed by the practitioner using computer design module 18. CAM machine 32 thus uses the G-code specifications and tool paths to physically fabricate an inner socket 20, as seen in
System 10 may thus be used to produce an artificial limb inner socket that is digitally designed to vary the forces applied to the residual limb for pressure-sensitive and tolerant areas. Moreover, system 10 can produce an inner socket from a single material while maintaining a uniform thickness within the socket yet having variable durometers to address pressure-sensitive and tolerant areas. System 10 makes it easy to control, adjust, and modulate socket pressures and, at the same time, does not require any increased volume of the inner socket, increased weight of the socket, or the use of multiple materials. While system 10 is best used for inner socket design and manufacturing, system 10 could be used for outer socket 22 design as well as for any other medical device or prosthetic element that would benefit from a customized patient fit.
Referring to
As described above, the present invention may be a system, a method, and/or a computer program associated therewith and is described herein with reference to flowcharts and block diagrams of methods and systems. The flowchart and block diagrams illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods, and computer programs of the present invention. It should be understood that each block of the flowcharts and block diagrams can be implemented by computer readable program instructions in software, firmware, or dedicated analog or digital circuits. These computer readable program instructions may be implemented on the processor of a general purpose computer, a special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine that implements a part or all of any of the blocks in the flowcharts and block diagrams. Each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of instructions, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical functions. It should also be noted that each block of the block diagrams and flowchart illustrations, or combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and flowcharts, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specified functions or acts or carry out combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.
The present application claims priority to U.S. Nonprovisional application Ser. No. 15/444,841, filed on Feb. 28, 2017, and entitled “Prosthetic Limb Socket With Variable Hardness,” which claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/301,363, filed on Feb. 29, 2016, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4923475 | Gosthnian et al. | May 1990 | A |
5050090 | Golub et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5444881 | Landi et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5496610 | Landi et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5522402 | Cooley | Jun 1996 | A |
5539649 | Walsh et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5552992 | Hunter | Sep 1996 | A |
6068659 | O'Brien, Jr. | May 2000 | A |
6136039 | Kristinsson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6177034 | Ferrone | Jan 2001 | B1 |
7162322 | Arbogast et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7611476 | Taranow | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7937973 | Sorensen et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8005651 | Summit | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8173268 | Maus et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8175734 | Fogel | May 2012 | B2 |
8366789 | Summit | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8423167 | Sanders | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8449707 | Simmons | May 2013 | B2 |
8523951 | Kania | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8551184 | Herr | Oct 2013 | B1 |
9072463 | Sanders et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9265629 | Kelley | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9283660 | Dignam et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9469075 | Zachariasen et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9480581 | Layman et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9545127 | Sandifer | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9636238 | Sanders et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9782274 | Summit et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
10639173 | Walter | May 2020 | B2 |
10980306 | Weber | Apr 2021 | B2 |
20040068337 | Watson et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040260402 | Baldini | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050145563 | Boyd et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060020348 | Slemker et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060105135 | Chien et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111792 | Shannon | May 2006 | A1 |
20060123542 | Wilson et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070080479 | Arbogast | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070162153 | Barnes | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080155735 | Ferrara | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080161963 | Slemker et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080188948 | Flatt | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20100023149 | Sanders | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100030083 | Sanders | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100161076 | Pallari | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110004335 | Summit et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110082578 | Stanhope | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110126973 | Andrewlavage, Jr. et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110241240 | Gothait et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120022657 | Iannotti et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120116539 | Armstrong et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120143077 | Sanders et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120173001 | Caspers | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130035770 | Egilsson | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130052398 | Dean et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130124151 | Mech et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130150981 | Summit | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130226533 | Summit et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130282141 | Herr | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140005800 | Kelley | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140088929 | Suttin, Sr. et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140149082 | Sanders | May 2014 | A1 |
20140163697 | Sanders et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140173812 | Krueger | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140188260 | Layman et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140228860 | Steines et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140288670 | Phillips | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140303748 | Armstrong | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140316526 | Grotz | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150142150 | Layman et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150278414 | Zhou et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150297369 | Mosler et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150328840 | Zachariasen et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150359644 | Sanders et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160005851 | Song | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160331563 | Kane et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170131788 | Kaku | May 2017 | A1 |
20170161405 | Ishizuka et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170174346 | Wilson et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170216056 | Hill | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170231788 | Kelley | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170246013 | Erenstone | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170290685 | Montez et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170323037 | Schroeder | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170354367 | Laghi | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170360578 | Shin et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180098865 | Mojica et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180235779 | Dudding | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180243111 | Hand | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180243112 | Hand | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20190021880 | Herr | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20210022891 | Herr | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20220133173 | Herr | May 2022 | A1 |
20220211522 | Polta | Jul 2022 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 15/444,841, filed Feb. 28, 2017; Gau 2118; Confirmation No. 7069; Customer No. 05409. |
Office Action (dated Nov. 19, 2018) for U.S. Appl. No. 15/444,841, filed Feb. 28, 2017. |
Final Office Action (dated Jul. 29, 2019) for U.S. Appl. No. 15/444,841, filed Feb. 28, 2017. |
Office Action (dated Apr. 16, 2020) for U.S. Appl. No. 15/444,841, filed Feb. 28, 2017. |
Notice of Allowance (dated Sep. 28, 2020) for U.S. Appl. No. 15/444,841, filed Feb. 28, 2017. |
PCT International Search Report Form PCT/ISA/220, International Application No. PCT/US/2017/019878, International Filing Date: Feb. 18, 2017, mailing date of Search Report: dated Jun. 5, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210137705 A1 | May 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62301363 | Feb 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15444841 | Feb 2017 | US |
Child | 17147562 | US |