The present invention provides an innovative antenna system for underground vaults. It addresses the important requirement of ground level azimuth coverage, while providing the means to achieve elevation coverage as required. It also addresses the means of mass producing low cost antenna solutions for widespread microcell deployments while addressing the technical issues associated with underground vaults.
Ground level vaults are widely employed by service providers such as cable television providers, or telephone providers, to access buried plant equipment and cable. These vaults are typically positioned to be flush with the ground level, and are found throughout metropolitan areas where cable or telecom equipment is located.
With the proliferation of wireless local area networks or WLANs, there has been an increase in requirements to find cost effective means to deploy access points using various “assets” available to service providers. One key asset which many service providers have in abundance is underground vaults.
The present invention provides a means of providing repeatable and optimized radio frequency (RF) coverage using vaults as the source of the radiating element. As is well known in the industry, good RF coverage usually relies on antennas to be mounted at high elevations, such as on a pole or roof top. Most cities have hundreds or thousands of cell towers or roof top “macro-cells” consisting of high powered transmitters of 40 W-per-radio channel with large high gain antennas. These macro-cells provide cellular coverage extending hundreds to thousands of meters. Many radio propagation models are published detailing the empirical tradeoff of antenna height with respect to cellular coverage. This is a well known and documented science.
As the cellular revolution has progressed, and the number of cellular users has grown, more cost effective lower power (i.e., up to 4 W) base stations have been introduced to provide smaller cellular coverage zones of a few hundred meters. Mounting of equipment on light poles, and street level assets such as bulletin boards or building walls, have become a cost effective means of achieving cellular underlay networks, used to offload the capacity of the macro-cellular network. Cell coverage areas of less than a few hundred meters have not been considered, in part due to the high costs of the microcells, but also due to the high leasing cost of the mounting assets.
The cellular revolution has progressed with the introduction of “pico-cells” and “nano-cells”; however, neither of these two types of base stations has been used in any significant way for outdoor cellular coverage. Pico-cellular base stations have not yet found a practical use in the industry. However, nano-cell base stations have successfully found a significant market penetration for indoor residential applications.
Wireless LAN systems have risen as a disruptive technology to cellular systems. WLAN systems employ unlicensed spectrum and offer data throughput levels which are two orders of magnitude higher than commercially deployed cellular systems. WLAN systems also have lower transmitter power (i.e., typically less than 4 W EIRP) and operate in an uncontrolled unlicensed spectrum and cannot readily be deployed using macro cells roof tops or cell towers. Outdoor WLAN systems have typically been deployed by attaching the WLAN transceivers to street light poles or handing these transceivers on cable plant in the same fashion that cable amplifiers or DSL repeaters are deployed and powered. These WLAN systems typically provide coverage radii of hundreds of meters. Smaller cells have been deployed inside specific venues such as Starbucks or McDonald's. These coverage areas are very small—having radii in the range of tens of meters up to one hundred meters, but cost effective due to the low equipment costs of the WLAN transceivers.
Many venues have been found which had no above ground assets upon which to place a WLAN transceiver. These venues include communities with no aerial plant or above-ground power or communications poles. In some areas, poles may exist, but municipal regulations prohibit the deployment of equipment on the poles, as a regulation to minimize visible clutter. In all of these areas, the same services are typically carried, but are buried and carried through under ground conduits, accessible only at pedestals, metal service cabinets, or at ground level vault locations. Accordingly, the present invention addresses this shortcoming.
In one aspect, the invention provides a fringe-effect antenna module having coupling structure configured to couple the module to a communications vault disposed substantially at ground level. A support structure is coupled to the coupling structure, and at least one antenna element is coupled to the support structure. A metallic deflector is coupled to at least one of (i) the coupling structure and (ii) the support structure. The metallic deflector has an edge, which is positioned substantially parallel to the ground. The metallic deflector and the edge are configured to cause a fringe effect upon the RF signals of the antenna to cause the RF signals to bend in a direction toward the ground.
Preferably, the metallic deflector comprises an upside-down, frusto-rectangular shape having four sloped sides.
The fringe-effect vault antenna may further include a bell jar cover attached to the vault cover, the bell jar being configured to maintain an air pocket around the at least one antenna element. A radome may be mounted beneath the bell jar cover.
The fringe-effect vault antenna may be selected from the group consisting of an omni-directional fringe-effect vault antenna, a directional fringe-effect vault antenna, a parabolic fringe-effect vault antenna, and a corner reflecting fringe-effect vault antenna.
In another aspect, the invention a vault antenna module having a support structure including electronic circuitry. Coupling structure is coupled to the support structure and is configured to couple to a substantially ground-level vault. An antenna element is coupled to the support structure. A deflector plate has at least one edge that is configured to bend RF signals to/from the antenna element in a direction substantially along the ground. A cable connector is coupled to the support structure.
In yet another aspect, the invention provides a method of propagating RF signals to/from a substantially ground-level vault having an antenna element below ground level. A support structure is coupled into the substantially ground-level vault, and a sloped deflector, coupled to the support structure, is disposed to intersect a main beam of the antenna element. An edge of the deflector is disposed to cause a fringe effect on the RF signals of the antenna element to bend the RF signals in a direction toward the ground level.
The means of wired connectivity coupled into the module may be selected from the group consisting of DOCSIS, DSL, ADSL, HDSL, VDSL, EPON, GPON, Optical Ethernet, T1, and E1. The at least one antenna element may be configured to enable wide-band multi-carrier operation. The at least one wireless transceiver may include a plurality of wireless transceivers, and the at least one antenna element may include a plurality of antenna elements, each of the plurality of antenna elements corresponding to a different one of the plurality of wireless transceivers.
a and 29b are, respectively, end and side views of a further embodiment according to the present invention.
WLAN solutions have been deployed inside above ground pedestals and in above-ground cabinets. These solutions maximize cell coverage, achieving reaches of 150 m-300 m depending on ground level clutter. Advanced multiple input-multiple output (MIMO) radio features and antennas can extend this coverage; and deployment redundancy is the main means used to ensure that clients using these systems are rarely affected by ground level propagation impairments.
The present invention addresses the specific aspect of ground level vaults as a means of providing WLAN coverage. These vaults have not typically been used in the cellular industry for outdoor coverage, and hence there has been no available literature or science developed for optimal radio or antenna solutions. The key issue associated with using ground level vaults is the ability to provide ground level coverage—that is, the ability to provide acceptable antenna gain along the street so that pedestrians and local businesses will see radio coverage from the vault.
To tackle this problem, simulation tools have been used to simulate a variety of antenna solutions which could be readily deployed in the vault. The goal has been to achieve a coverage radius of greater than 100 meters of street level coverage from a single vault, so that specific venues could be covered in a cost-effective manner using a few wireless transceivers. In a preferred embodiment, these transceivers employ DOCSIS 2.0 backhaul for connection to the Internet, and are plant-powered from 40-90 VAC supplied over the main feeder networks of the cable service providers. However, in an alternative embodiment, this system could employ DOCSIS 3.0, DSL, VDSL, HDSL or other means connected to the Internet, and could employ standard AC powering such as 100-240 VAC, or higher voltage AC power such as 277, 374, 480, or 600 VAC, or even pair-powered via ±137 VDC or ±180 VDC or other suitable power.
The simulations all showed that ground level vault deployments suffered from poor gain at street level. For example, referring to
Multiple additional simulations were also conducted. In the additional simulations, several aspects of the vault antenna system were varied—for example, referring to
In outdoor deployments, RF signals can “fringe” or edge-diffract around buildings. In electromagnetic wave propagation, edge diffraction (or the knife-edge effect) is a redirection by diffraction of a portion of the incident radiation that strikes a well-defined obstacle. The knife-edge effect is explained by Huygens-Fresnel principle, which states that a well-defined obstruction to an electromagnetic wave acts as a secondary source, and creates a new wavefront. This new wavefront propagates into the geometric shadow area of the obstacle. The term “fringe-effect” is used herein to describe edge diffraction or the knife-edge effect.
The design of a “fringe effect” into the vault antenna—i.e., a metallic edge for causing the radio signals from the antenna to “diffract” toward the ground—has also been modeled and simulated by the present inventors. The initial results have been promising, showing a consistent and repeatable antenna gain along the horizon/street level. These results are shown in
Additional simulations have been performed to test variations of metallic edges, and also to test antenna orientations to determine an optimal fringe effect antenna design for vaults. Referring to
Further simulations have been conducted to attempt to optimize the antenna tilt and relative position in the vault antenna bracket to determine optimal tilts. Referring to
In this manner, an innovative antenna system according to a preferred embodiments of the present invention has been designed and field-tested to verify functional operation. The description below explains the important fringe effects which are utilized and the means by which they are incorporated into a vault antenna according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention. Moreover, the present invention provides important aspects of the fringe effect vault antenna, including details of the mounting bracket, such as the relative location and tilt of the antenna element. Protective measures to ensure that a vault antenna operates correctly under adverse weather conditions which would result in flooding of the vault are also described. The present invention may be implemented by using different types of vault covers from different manufacturers, such as plastic vault covers manufactured by Pencell or concrete vault covers manufactured by NewBasis. Potential variations of the vault antenna, which allow for different orientations of vaults and different directional and omni-directional antenna solutions for coverage, are also described. Elevation directed antennas for building coverage are also disclosed. MIMO vault antennas are also disclosed.
With the evolution of the wireless industry to smaller cells utilizing the widely available asset of vaults, it is anticipated that vaults will become important, not only for WLAN-IEEE 802.11bgn and IEEE 802.11an coverage, but also for next generation cellular systems such as IEEE 802.16e, “LTE” or Long Term Evolution, or other such cellular standards.
There are at least two preferred embodiments of the vault antenna according to the present invention: the omni vault antenna and the directional vault antenna. Both preferred embodiments are intended for street coverage, although the directional vault antenna has multiple variations which enable coverage of tall buildings as well as street level coverage. These two embodiments are described below. Alternative embodiments of the present invention include parabolic and corner reflector vault antennas, which are similar to the directional vault antenna, but for which the shape of the deflector bracket is either parabolic or V-shaped as a corner reflector.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the desired fringe-effect may be optimized by ensuring that the metal fringe completely covers the entire beamwidth of the signal azimuth for the received signal. The curvature of the metal fringe may vary from a completely flat fringe, as illustrated in
OMNI VAULT ANTENNA. The omni vault antenna provides an effective means of omni-directional coverage of a street or open venue. This antenna is located in a ground level vault (where the top of the vault is at ground level, or slightly thereabove or therebelow; and the antenna is below ground level) and includes one or more omni-directional antennas mounted in a bracket which slopes upwards to the edge of the vault. Referring to
Referring to
As shown in
DIRECTIONAL VAULT ANTENNA. A directional vault antenna provides an effective means of directional coverage of a street or open venue. This antenna, located in a substantially ground level vault, includes one or more directional antenna elements mounted in a bracket which slopes upwards to the edge of the vault. Referring to
Referring to
The directional vault antenna preferably includes a single directional antenna 36 in the center area 42, although for MIMO systems, multiple directional antenna elements would typically be used. At the base of the directional antenna are drain holes (not shown in
The directional antenna deflector bracket 48 generally slopes upward and away from the antenna 36 with a largely continuous edge 26 just below the vault cover. The upward slope, combined with the largely continuous edge of the antenna being located at or near the ground level that diffracts the radio waves causing them to bend towards the ground, resulting in a higher effective antenna gain along the ground. One or more tilt structures 50 may be provided to tilt the antenna 36 (in azimuth and/or elevation) to beam-steer the RF signals as desired. Likewise, an adjusting mechanism 52 may be provided to change the angle, elevation, slope, and/or the position of the plate 44 in order to adjust adjusting or steer the main beam of the antenna 36.
In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, an active high-power vault antenna that does not include a metal edge deflector may be provided. For example, a Wi-Fi™ transceiver that uses a vault antenna may be implemented, provided that sufficient gain can be obtained with a vault antenna that does not include a metal edge diffractor. If the antenna in
In another alternative embodiment of the present invention, an RF transceiver using an antenna according to the description above may be implemented. Such a transceiver may be implemented as a multiband transceiver, a multicarrier transceiver system, or as a multiband, multicarrier transceiver system.
According to a further embodiment, an installation kit or module according to the present invention may be installed in a third-party vault. In
In
As shown in
The electronics unit support structure 246 preferably comprises a cast-metal structure configured to contain electronic circuitry such as a transmitter, a receiver, a processor, a memory, a power supply, a cable-connection, etc. For example, the electronics unit support structure 246 may contain circuitry similar to that described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,254,865; 8,189,551; 8,009,562; 7,693,105; 7,660,559; and 7,164,667, each of which is incorporated herein by reference. The electronics unit support structure 246 may also include plural cooling fins 262 (
a and 29b are, respectively, end and side views of a further embodiment according to the present invention. The support element 246 is mounted inside an enclosure 274, which includes a box-shaped bottom portion 275 and the deflector 230 (which are, preferably, integral). Antenna elements 242a, 242f, and 242e are shown, while further (optional) antenna elements 242i, 242j, and 242k are also shown. Preferably, the top of the enclosure 274 is substantially adjacent to ground level, as discussed above. The bent-angled portions 295 are differently-angled portions of the periphery of the upper edge of deflector plate 230, which are added for structural rigidity at the peripheral edge.
While the foregoing detailed description has described particular preferred embodiments of this invention, it is to be understood that the above description is illustrative only and not limiting of the disclosed invention. While preferred embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described herein, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes, and substitutions will now occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the invention.
This is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/870,259, filed Aug. 27, 2010 which is a non-provisional of U.S. Patent Appln. No. 61/237,822, filed Aug. 28, 2009, the entire contents of all which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61237822 | Aug 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12870259 | Aug 2010 | US |
Child | 13609971 | US |