The present device relates to a protective armor for critical areas of vehicles, including underbelly armor for military vehicles. More specifically, the device relates to an armored floor construction for a personnel cabin using a combination of layered materials and structural configurations to protect the vehicle occupants from blast energy and fragmentation resulting from an explosive device.
Armored vehicles are threatened by improvised explosive devices (IEDs) designed to cause harm to the vehicle and its occupants. IEDs are typically one or more grouped artillery shells redeployed and detonated in an effort to inflict casualties. Harm from these devices typically comes in the form of high pressure blast energy and ballistic fragmentation in the following predominant ways: (1) rapid surface pressure and destructive hull deformation resulting in hull breach and direct occupant exposure to blast pressures and intense heat; (2) high velocity, hull and/or floor accelerations resulting in occupant incapacities; and (3) high velocity fragmentation passing through armor and impacting occupants.
Armor countermeasures typically consist of heavy metal plates placed between the threat and the vehicle in such a way as to resist hull breach and aggressive floor accelerations. These heavy metal plates also work in concert with layers of additional metal, ceramic, composite or plastic materials designed to prevent lethal high velocity artillery shell fragments from entering the vehicle. The heavy metal plates are typically mounted to the underside of the vehicle in a V-shape in an effort to take advantage of shape efficiency and deflection characteristics when presented with incoming pressure and fragmentation. Carrying heavy blast and fragment resistant hulls results in significant performance disadvantage to the vehicle in terms of reduced fuel economy, lost cargo capacity and increased transportation shipping costs.
The present device is an armored floor device, or blast floor, for a personnel cabin, using a combination of layered materials and having certain configurations to increase the distance from an outside threat at the vulnerable bottom centerline position to protect the occupants from blast energy and fragmentation. In addition, the intended device seeks to provide an improved blast and ballistic performance armored hull floor at significantly reduced weights.
There is disclosed herein an improved system and method for protecting a personnel cabin of a military vehicle which avoids the disadvantages of prior systems while affording additional structural and costs advantages.
Generally speaking, a composite armor for use as an underbelly of a personnel cabin for a vehicle is disclosed, which comprises a first layer forming an interior bottom surface of the cabin and comprised of a high-strength metal material, a second layer forming an exterior bottom surface of the cabin and comprised of a high-strength metal material, and a middle layer sandwiched between the first and second layers and comprised of a polymer material. Alternatively, the middle or core layer comprises a plurality of layers comprised of at least one material selected from the group consisting of a thermoplastic polymer, a fiber reinforced composite or aromatic polyamide.
In various embodiments of the device, the underbelly is configured having a raised ridge along a center central longitudinal line area and lower parallel edges. The underbelly may have any shape, including a curvilinear shape or a saddle shape. The raised ridge includes opposing higher ends and a lower center along the longitudinal area line of the cabin, creating an increased distance at opposing ends of the cabin between the interior space and an exterior threat.
In other embodiments of the device, the device further comprises a second multilayered structure comprising a first layer comprised of a glass fiber reinforced polymer matrix material and a second layer comprised of a metal. The second multilayered structure is positioned above and partially integrated with the underbelly forming an interior floor of the cabin, the interior floor being configured having a raised ridge along a center central longitudinal line area and lower parallel edges complementary to the underbelly.
In yet another embodiment, a blast protection structure forming a floor of a personnel cabin of a vehicle, is disclosed. The structure comprises a first layer forming an interior bottom surface of the floor and comprised of at least one material selected from the group consisting of a high-strength low-alloy steel, a hardened aluminum, or a high carbon steel, a second layer forming an exterior bottom surface of the floor and comprised of at least one material selected from the group consisting of a high-strength low-alloy steel, a hardened aluminum, or a high carbon steel, a middle layer sandwiched between the first and second layers and comprised of at least one material selected from the group consisting of a polypropylene thermoplastic composite or a glass fiber reinforced thermoplastic composite, wherein the floor is configured having a raised ridge along a central longitudinal line area of the cabin and lower parallel sides, the raised ridge further having opposing higher ends and a lower center along the central longitudinal area of the cabin creating a distance at opposing ends of the cabin between the interior space and an exterior threat. The blast protection structure may also include a shield structure on the exterior of the cabin.
In yet another embodiment, a blast protection floor for an occupant cabin of a personnel vehicle, is disclosed. The floor comprises a composite structure configured having a plurality of high areas and low areas creating deflection faces, venting areas, and separation distances between an interior of the cabin and an exterior threat. When an explosive device is encountered and detonated, the deflection faces and venting areas deflect and vent the blast force away from the interior of the cabin and its occupants. In addition, the high and low areas create the separation distance between the explosion and the interior of the cabin, dissipating the force of the explosion prior to it reaching the interior of the cabin. A second composite structure may be added, which serves as an interior floor of the cabin and a fragmentation penetration barrier to the interior of the cabin. The second composite structure has a configuration complementary to that of the floor.
Referring to
Generally speaking, the device 10 of
Turning to
The second layer 16 forms an exterior bottom surface 12b of the cabin 12. The second layer 16 may be constructed from a high-strength metal material, either as a single layer or multiple layers, including from at least one material selected from the group consisting of a high-strength low-alloy steel, a hardened aluminum, or a high carbon steel. The thickness of the second layer 16 can range from about 0.125 inches to about 0.5 inches.
The middle or core layer 18 is sandwiched between the first 14 and second 16 layers, and is constructed primarily from a polymer material, as either a single layer or multiple layers. Alternatively, the middle or core layer 18 is constructed from a plurality of layers comprised of at least one material selected from the group consisting of a thermoplastic polymer, a fiber reinforced composite or an aromatic polyamide. The thickness of the middle or core layer 14 can range from about 0.5 inches to about 1.0 inches.
Referring to
As illustrated in the accompanying Figures showing the various embodiments, the underbelly device (for simplicity will be referred to generally as 10) in all instances is configured generally having a heightened section including a plurality of high areas, above a central longitudinal plane area, and a plurality of low areas, below the lateral plane of the interior area of the cabin 12, 120 or 320.
The underbelly device 10 is designed to meet or exceed military requirements for hull breach and occupant performance criteria when subjected to a given type of blast threat. In addition, the underbelly device meets the requirements for minimal floor (subfloor) deformation and tactical load requirements, while being manufactured at a competitive cost.
This application is a conversion of the provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/357,665 filed on Jun. 23, 2010.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4198454 | Norton | Apr 1980 | A |
4404889 | Miguel | Sep 1983 | A |
4492282 | Appelblatt et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4572571 | Malen | Feb 1986 | A |
5533781 | Williams | Jul 1996 | A |
5663520 | Ladika et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
6363830 | Gonzalez | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6477934 | Bruhn et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6779431 | Honlinger | Aug 2004 | B2 |
7069836 | Palicka et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7114764 | Barsoum et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7255034 | Strassgurtl et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7712823 | Greuter et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7770506 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7810875 | Gerisch | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7854472 | Gomi | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8096225 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8151685 | Joynt | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8220378 | Gamache et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8246106 | Boczek et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
20030010189 | Zonak | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20070084337 | Strassgurtl et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080066613 | Mills et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080315629 | Abe et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090102238 | Gomi | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090293712 | Ran et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100011948 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100078966 | Onoda et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110079134 | JacQuemont et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110168001 | Lee | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110197744 | Cox | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120186424 | Tunis et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120186428 | Peer et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110314999 A1 | Dec 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61357665 | Jun 2010 | US |