Patent Grant
9846013
This application is the U.S. national phase entry of International Patent Application No. PCT/GB2014/050653, entitled “VEHICLE ARMOUR,” filed Mar. 5, 2014, which application claims the benefit of United Kingdom Patent Application No. 1304900.2, entitled “VEHICLE ARMOUR,” filed Mar. 13, 2013, the entire disclosures of both of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
This invention relates to vehicle armour.
Armour for vehicles has to meet a number of constraints. Vehicle armour needs to:—
The benchmark against which armour tends to be assessed is rolled homogeneous armour (RHA) a hot rolled steel.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,151,686 discloses armour aimed at protecting against an explosively formed projectile [EFP] and comprising a hard layer disposed facing the threat; a unidirectional fiber layer disposed behind said hard layer; and a catcher layer behind said unidirectional fiber layer.
Disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,151,686 is armour that is alleged to have the same level of ballistic protection against an EFP threat but at a lower areal density than for RHA [385.7 kg/m2 as compared with 1040 kg/m2].
This lower areal density comes with a penalty of increased thickness. An areal density of 1040 kg/m2 for RHA implies a thickness of about 13.25 cm. The armour exemplified in U.S. Pat. No. 8,151,686 has an overall thickness exterior to the vehicle hull of 35.02 cm. This near tripling in thickness poses design problems for armouring vehicles, particularly around hatches, and decreases vehicle manoeuvrability with a consequent increase in minor damage through impacts.
The armour used in the example of U.S. Pat. No. 8,151,686 uses two steel plates and one segmented ceramic plate to provide the required level of protection against EFP threats.
The steel plate first encountered by the EFP is intended to provide significant protection against the EFP. The succeeding layers between that steel plate and the segmented ceramic plate are designed to:—
This results in a significant part of the thickness of the armour used in the example of U.S. Pat. No. 8,151,686 [22.6 cm of the overall 35.02 cm] lying between the front steel plate and the segmented ceramic plate.
Further, this arrangement places the armour destined to shield against EFP threats exposed to damage from small arms fire and from minor vehicle collisions, which could compromise the integrity of the armour.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,151,686 uses a steel outer armour which, to some extent, will be tolerant of vehicle collisions, a “fender bender” will be just that. However, U.S. Pat. No. 8,151,686 provides no means of coping with such collisions where the outer armour is of ceramic, and the use of steel imposes a weight penalty in comparison with ceramic. The inventors have provided armour that maximises the use of ceramic and provides protection to the ceramic to prevent damage in the event of collision.
In the following:—
The applicants have realised that improved vehicle armour may be provided comprising an assembly of:—
Further details and feature of armour as claimed are set out in the claims and in the following illustrative description with reference to the drawings in which:—
Armour comprises:—
The outer armour pack A comprises an outermost outer fibre reinforced composite protective layer 1 of at least 1 mm thickness; an outer ceramic armour layer 2 to protect against small arms and provide initial fragmentation of a penetrator; and an inner fibre reinforced composite support layer 3 to absorb residual energy from small arms.
The outermost outer fibre reinforced composite protective layer 1 may comprise one or more layers and acts to protect the outer ceramic armour layer against minor impacts, e.g. low speed impacts. To some extent, the thicker this layer the better to protect the ceramic armour layer 2 from damage. A typical thickness might be 2 mm-10 mm. Suitable materials include any material that can protect against blunt trauma. The fibres of the reinforced composite may be of any suitable type and includes without limitation, glass fibres, ceramic fibres, carbon fibres, polymer fibres (for example, but not limited to aramids), and mixtures thereof. The matrix of the composite material may be of any suitable type and includes without limitation thermoplastic materials and thermosetting materials. The fibres of the composite may be in the form of:—
The outer ceramic armour layer 2 may be segmented armour and may comprise tiles or pellets of ceramic and the ceramic may be of any ballistically suitable type, including without limitation; alumina, silicon carbide, boron carbide, and composite ceramics. Typically the thickness is greater than 4 mm, but thickness depends on threat level.
The inner fibre reinforced composite support layer 3 may be of identical or different composition to the outermost fibre reinforced composite protective layer 1 but is provided with a thickness sufficient to absorb residual energy from small arms impacting the outer armour pack A. A typical thickness might be 10-20 mm but thicknesses outside this range [particularly greater thicknesses to combat higher small arms threat levels] are contemplated.
The outer armour pack A is spaced from an inner armour pack C by an air gap B. The spacing is maintained by spacers 4 which may be in the form of washers, as shown, strips or any other shape that may maintain the air gap. The spacers 4 may be stiff or may be of a resilient material to absorb energy in the event of impact. Steel or aluminium are suitable materials for the spacers. The air gap 4 may be relatively small as its presence is required to provide a degree of deflection before energy is transferred to the inner armour pack C. A thickness of 1 to 10 mm may suffice but greater than or equal to 2 mm is preferred to permit greater deflection, and less than or equal to 8 mm is preferred to minimise overall armour thickness.
The inner armour pack C comprises
The outer fibre reinforced composite protective layer 5 is configured to protect the inner segmented ceramic armour layer 6 against damage during handling or maintenance of the armour. The outer fibre reinforced composite protective layer 5 may be of identical or different composition to the outermost fibre reinforced composite protective layer 1 but as it is intended primarily to protect against handling or maintenance may of less thickness than the outermost fibre reinforced composite protective layer 1. A typical thickness might be greater than 1 mm or greater than 2 mm, or less than 10 mm or less than 5 mm.
The inner segmented ceramic amour layer 6 may comprise tiles or pellets embedded in a resin, and may, for example and without limitation, comprise a layer as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,601,497, EP1734332, WO2006/103431, or U.S. Pat. No. 8,151,686. The segments of the inner segmented ceramic amour layer 6 may be of any suitable shape and includes, for example and without limitation, square, rectangular or hexagonal tiles, or tiles or pellets of any of the shapes disclosed in the above mentioned documents. The ceramic of the inner segmented ceramic amour layer 6 may be of any ballistically suitable ceramic and includes, without limitation alumina, silicon carbide, boron carbide, and composite ceramics. The specific material and the thickness of ceramic in the inner segmented ceramic amour layer 6 are selected to deal with a chosen threat level. Typical thicknesses might be 15 mm or more. The greater the threat the greater the appropriate thickness for a given material.
The innermost inner fibre reinforced composite layer 7 is of at least 10 mm thickness and may be up to 20 mm, 40 mm, or even more, dependent on the threat level and the degree of support required. The innermost inner fibre reinforced composite layer 7 is intended to provide support to the inner segmented ceramic amour layer 6 in the event of a ballistic impact. The innermost inner fibre reinforced composite layer 7 may be of identical or different composition to the inner fibre reinforced composite support layer 3, but a preferred material is a carbon fibre composite, as providing a high stiffness with a low weight. Energy absorption properties are not so important for the materials of this layer as the degree of stiffness and support it provides to the inner segmented ceramic amour layer 6.
Behind the inner armour pack C is a high energy absorbing layer D of at least 25 mm thickness. This is configured to mitigate the effect of residual fragments defeating the outer and inner armour packs. The thickness required is a factor of the efficiency of the rest of the armour. Thicknesses of greater than 30 mm, greater than 55 mm, greater than 60 mm, greater than 70 mm, or greater than 80 mm are within the contemplation of the inventors.
Several layers may be provided to give the required thickness and the drawings show two layers 8 of thickness that may be less than 25 mm totalling together over 25 mm.
In similar manner, it should be noted that any one of the layers 1,2,3, 5,6,7 of the claimed armour may comprise several separate layers.
The material for high energy absorbing layer D may comprise high molecular weight polyethylene [e.g. Dyneema™ or SpectraShield™], high molecular weight polypropylene [e.g. Tegris™], any other suitable material.
The high energy absorbing layer D may be in contact with or spaced from the inner armour pack C, but advantageously is in contact to offer additional support to the ceramic segments.
The armour is configured to permit mounting of the assembly of
The drawings show [as an optional feature] an interface plate 10 to assist mounting of the armour to the hull 11. The interface plate 10 may be of a material and thickness chosen to provide some further ballistic resistance, for example of steel or aluminium.
The air gap E may be maintained by spacers 9 which may be stiff or resilient and may be of identical or different materials to spacers 4.
The entire assembly may be held together by bolts 12 passing through holes in the separate integers of the armour. The outer armour pack A; the inner armour pack C; and the high energy absorbing layer D may be provided as separate components and assembled and mounted to the hull in situ. The outer armour pack A and inner armour pack C may be provided as an assembled body for mounting with the high energy absorbing layer D to the hull. The inner armour pack C may be mounted to the hull and the outer armour pack A mounted to the inner armour pack, thereby facilitating replacement of the outer armour pack A without necessitating complete dismantling of the armour.
Adhesives may be used to join the integers of the outer armour pack A together; and may be used to join the integers of the inner armour pack C together. Preferably the adhesive has significant flexibility.
An example of armour as claimed comprises the components:—
The above description is illustrative only and it will be evident to the skilled person that modifications and variants may be applied while still within the scope and spirit of the invention. Particular variants may be in the selection of materials for the different layers and the present invention contemplates use of both known and future materials in the invention.
The following claims use multiple dependencies. For the avoidance of doubt the present application discloses and covers each and every combination of features disclosed by any combination of claims.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1304900.2 | Mar 2013 | GB | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/GB2014/050653 | 3/5/2014 | WO | 00 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2014/140531 | 9/18/2014 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3516898 | Cook | Jun 1970 | A |
| 5499568 | Turner | Mar 1996 | A |
| 6601497 | Ghiorse et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 8151686 | Ravid et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 20100330341 | Percival et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110030543 | Ravid | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110192275 | Medwell | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20120183716 | Jordan | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120186432 | St. Claire | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20150114211 | Medwell et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150143984 | Medwell et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150176950 | Moran et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150184979 | Moran et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150377595 | Scarinci | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1734332 | Dec 2006 | EP |
| 2204631 | Jul 2010 | EP |
| 2803379 | Jul 2001 | FR |
| 2006103431 | Oct 2006 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| International Patent Application No. PCT/GB2014/050653, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 16, 2014. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20160025458 A1 | Jan 2016 | US |
