The invention relates to a vehicle arrestor system that protects at-risk sites from vehicle born attacks. The present invention is intended for two main purposes: 1) a vehicle speed limit enforcement system (i.e., speed reduction); and 2) a vehicle arrestor system that can be effective in certain type of terrorist attack.
Barriers for restricting the passage of vehicles (such as automobiles, trucks, busses, airplanes and the like) are generally known. Barriers that are fixed in the roadway, meaning they do not move by device or mechanism, are typically categorized as “passive” or “inoperable” barriers. These types of barriers are either removably placed on the roadway or sidewalk surrounding an at-risk site, or they are installed into the ground or built into the landscape/streetscape. Known installed “passive” barriers typically include foundation walls (typically at least 36″ high), or bollards in the form of “posts” embedded in a concrete foundation, and beds of a crushable material (such as concrete). Walls and bollards are intended to stop vehicles through impact resistance, having sufficient shear strength to remain intact at impact and relying on the inertia of their foundations to bring a vehicle to a halt.
In addition to vehicle barrier systems, vehicle arresting systems are also known. Where vehicle barrier systems are intended to immediately stop a vehicle, vehicle arresting systems are intended to control the stopping of a vehicle over a given time and/or distance. Known arresting systems include beds of a crushable material (such as concrete), fences and gates, and cable and elastic (e.g. “bungee cord”) systems. Crushable beds tend to utilize the interaction between the bed and the tire(s) of the vehicle. As a vehicle moves across the crushable material, the weight of the vehicle causes it to sink into the bed. At the same time, the spinning of the tire “rips” through the crushable material. As the vehicle drops farther into the bed, the tires' rotation tends to become slower until finally the vehicle is stopped. For example, crushable beds at the ends of aircraft runways for aircraft that “overshoot” the runway are generally known for gradually decelerating the aircraft over an extended distance to minimize injury to occupants and damage to the aircraft.
These known vehicle barriers present a number of functional problems. Walls significantly impede pedestrian traffic and can cause pedestrian “herding” and “bottle necking.” Additionally, walls, and bollards as well, are somewhat visually restricting. The inherent height of the two, that is necessary for their function as a vehicle barrier, reduces the visual “openness” of the landscape/streetscape. Crushable beds are not optimal because they typically require an extended length of the crushable bed (upwards of 50 feet or more) to arrest a vehicle (and substantially longer for aircraft and the like). Such long lengths are generally not compatible with most urban applications, where space between a roadway and a building line or perimeter line is fairly small (e.g. 5-30 feet) and a primary objective of the barrier is to stop the progress of the vehicle within a relatively short distance. Such known vehicle barrier systems tend to provide limited application and flexibility to designers in providing an effective vehicle barrier system intended to meet applicable government performance standards, and is minimally obtrusive, for use in areas such as urban settings that typically have limited space for installation of such barriers.
In view of the foregoing, it would be highly desirable to provide an improved vehicle arrestor system that can serve a dual purpose of limiting vehicle speed and arresting movement of the vehicle.
The problem associated with providing a vehicle arrestor system that can serve a dual purpose is solved by providing a vehicle arrestor system that can be placed in an actuated position in which a movable plate is lower in elevation by a distance, D1, that will arrest forward movement of a vehicle, and can be lower in elevation by a distance, D2, than is smaller than the distance, D1, that notifies the driver to slow down.
In accordance with an aspect of the invention, a vehicle arrestor system comprises a ditch box defined by a pair of opposing side walls and a bottom wall extending between the side walls forming a chamber therebetween; a movable plate forming at least a portion of a top wall of the chamber; and a mechanical actuator operably coupled to the movable plate for causing the movable plate to move between a non-actuated position and an actuated position. The movable plate is substantially flush with a top surface of road pavement when in the non-actuated position, and the movable plate is not substantially flush with the top surface of road pavement when in the actuated position.
In another aspect, a vehicle arrestor system comprises a ditch box defined by a pair of opposing side walls and a bottom wall extending between the side walls forming a chamber therebetween; a movable plate forming at least a portion of a top wall of the chamber; and a mechanical actuator operably coupled to the movable plate for causing the movable plate to move between a non-actuated position and an actuated position. The vehicle arrestor system serves a dual purpose of arresting movement of a vehicle and providing a notification to a driver of the vehicle to slow down if the vehicle is exceeding the posted speed limit.
In yet another aspect of the invention, a method of controlling a vehicle leaving and entering a desired area by positioning one or more vehicle arrestor systems of the invention in strategically placed locations, P1-P3 in a “locked island” arrangement.
These and other aspects of the present invention will be more fully understood following a review of this specification and drawings.
While various embodiments of the invention are illustrated, the embodiments shown should not be construed to limit the claims. It is anticipated that various changes and modifications may be made without departing from the scope of this invention.
Referring to the drawings,
Approximating language, as used herein throughout the specification and claims, may be applied to modify any quantitative representation that could permissibly vary without resulting in a change in the basic function to which it is related. Accordingly, a value modified by a term or terms, such as “about”, “approximately”, and “substantially”, are not to be limited to the precise value specified. In at least some instances, the approximating language may correspond to the precision of an instrument for measuring the value. Here and throughout the specification and claims, range limitations may be combined and/or interchanged, such ranges are identified and include all the sub-ranges contained therein unless context or language indicates otherwise.
Throughout the text and the claims, use of the word “about” in relation to a range of values (e.g., “about 22 to 35 wt %”) is intended to modify both the high and low values recited, and reflects the penumbra of variation associated with measurement, significant figures, and interchangeability, all as understood by a person having ordinary skill in the art to which this invention pertains.
For purposes of this specification (other than in the operating examples), unless otherwise indicated, all numbers expressing quantities and ranges of ingredients, process conditions, etc are to be understood as modified in all instances by the term “about”. Accordingly, unless indicated to the contrary, the numerical parameters set forth in this specification and attached claims are approximations that can vary depending upon the desired results sought to be obtained by the present invention. At the very least, and not as an attempt to limit the application of the doctrine of equivalents to the scope of the claims, each numerical parameter should at least be construed in light of the number of reported significant digits and by applying ordinary rounding techniques. Further, as used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include plural referents, unless expressly and unequivocally limited to one referent.
Notwithstanding that the numerical ranges and parameters setting forth the broad scope of the invention are approximations, the numerical values set forth in the specific examples are reported as precisely as possible. Any numerical value, however, inherently contains certain errors necessarily resulting from the standard deviation found in their respective testing measurements including that found in the measuring instrument. Also, it should be understood that any numerical range recited herein is intended to include all sub-ranges subsumed therein. For example, a range of “1 to 10” is intended to include all sub-ranges between and including the recited minimum value of 1 and the recited maximum value of 10, i.e., a range having a minimum value equal to or greater than 1 and a maximum value of equal to or less than 10. Because the disclosed numerical ranges are continuous, they include every value between the minimum and maximum values. Unless expressly indicated otherwise, the various numerical ranges specified in this application are approximations.
In the following specification and the claims, a number of terms are referenced that have the following meanings.
The singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
“Optional” or “optionally” means that the subsequently described event or circumstance may or may not occur, and that the description includes instances where the event occurs and instances where it does not.
As shown in
In one embodiment, mechanical actuator 20 for moving the movable plate 18 comprises a conventional hydraulic cylinder (also called a linear hydraulic motor) with a piston rod 26 operably coupled to the movable plate 18 for providing a unidirectional force though a unidirectional stroke. The hydraulic cylinder 20 moves the movable plate 18 upwards and downwards in the vertical direction (indicated by the arrows in
When in the actuated position, the movable plate 18 is lower in elevation by a distance, D1, as compared to the non-actuated position in which the movable plate 18 is substantially flush with the top surface 25 of the road pavement 24. Of course, the movable plate 18 can at a higher elevation than the top surface 25 of the road pavement 24, but more damage may occur to the movable plate 18. It should be appreciated that the distance, D1, should be sufficient in order to arrest forward movement of the vehicle 28. In one embodiment, the distance, D1, is a function of the tire diameter of the vehicle 28. For example, the distance, D1, can be at least one-half the tire diameter of the vehicle 28. Thus, the distance, D1, can be at least 7 inches.
The vehicle arrestor system 10 may also include a warning light 32 that provides the driver (not shown) of the vehicle 28 with a visual indication that the vehicle arrestor system 10 has been activated and in the actuated position. It should be appreciated that the forward progress of the vehicle 28 is completely stopped when the vehicle arrestor system 10 is in the actuated position, as shown in
As shown in
Referring now to
In addition, the movable plate 18 of one or more of the vehicle arrestor systems 10 can be at the same elevation beneath the top surface 25 of the road pavement 24 or can be at different elevations. For example, the movable plate 18 of the vehicle arrestor system 10 that the driver first encounters may only be at an elevation of 1 inch below the top surface 25 of the road pavement 24. If the driver does not slow down below the posted speed limit, the movable plate 18 of the previously encountered vehicle arrestor system 10 encountered by the driver may be at an elevation of 2-4 inches below the top surface 25 of the road pavement 24. That is, the movable plate 18 of the next vehicle arrestor system 10 encountered by the driver will be at a lower elevation than the movable plate 18 of the first vehicle arrestor system 10. If the driver continues not to slow down below the posted speed limit, the movable plate 18 of the next vehicle arrestor system 10 encountered by the driver may be at an elevation of 5-7 inches below the top surface 25 of the road pavement 24. That is, the movable plate 18 of the next vehicle arrestor system 10 encountered by the driver will be at a lower elevation than the movable plate 18 of the previously encountered vehicle arrestor system 10. As can be understood, the movable plate 18 of each vehicle arrestor system 10 can be at any suitable elevation with respect to the top surface 25 of the road pavement 24 to produce the desired warning to the driver of the vehicle.
The vehicle arrestor system 10 can be arranged in a variety of different configurations. One such arrangement is shown in
As described above, the vehicle arrestor system 10 serves a dual purpose of arresting movement (i.e., forward and/or backward movement) of the vehicle 28 and providing a notification to the driver of the vehicle 28 to slow down if the vehicle 28 is exceeding the posted speed limit. It should be appreciated that the invention can be used for solely arresting movement of vehicle 28 or can be used for solely providing a notification to the driver of the vehicle 28 to reduce speed. In addition, one or more vehicle arrestor systems 10 of the invention can be positioned at strategically placed in the “locked island” arrangement
The patents and publications referred to herein are hereby incorporated by reference.
Whereas particular aspects of this invention have been described above for purposes of illustration, it will be evident to those skilled in the art that numerous variations of the details of the present invention may be made without departing from the invention as defined in the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/549,559, filed on Aug. 24, 2017, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1555386 | Schillinger | Sep 1925 | A |
4554695 | Rowland | Nov 1985 | A |
4600335 | Truglio | Jul 1986 | A |
4647246 | Brink et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4923327 | Gorlov | May 1990 | A |
5993104 | Marcotullio et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
7604430 | Pervan | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7775738 | Darcy | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7828492 | Rogers et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20150252540 | Lee | Sep 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190063019 A1 | Feb 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62549559 | Aug 2017 | US |