Vehicle door latch device

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6749234
  • Patent Number
    6,749,234
  • Date Filed
    Monday, September 23, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 15, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
A vehicle door latch device comprises a latch body, a latch provided in a recess of a latch body, and a ratchet provided in the recess. The latch body has a tongue part which comes into contact with an outer peripheral part of the latch, and a contact pin which comes into contact with the latch. The tongue part applies a first external force in an anti-rotational direction of the latch to the latch by contact with the outer peripheral part of the latch, and the contact pin applies a second external force in a axial direction of the latch shaft to the latch by contact with the latch. The tongue part comes into contact with the outer peripheral part when the latch is over-rotated exceeding a full-latched position.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to a vehicle door latch device and, more particularly, to a door latch device in which rattle of a latch to be engaged with a striker is prevented.




DESCRIPTION OF THE RELATED ART




As shown in

FIG. 8

, a conventional door latch device comprises a latch unit A attached to a vehicle door and a striker B fixed to a vehicle body (refer to U.S. Pat. No. 5,141,270). The closed state of a door is held in such a way where a ratchet C of the latch unit A is engaged with a latch D of the latch unit A to keep the engagement between the latch D and the striker B.




The latch D is rotatable to an over-rotated position from an unlatched position by the contact with the striker B. The situation from the unlatched position to the over-rotated position of the latch D is well shown in FIGS. 7 to 10 of U.S. Pat. No. 5,618,068. When the door is moved toward the closed position, the latch D is rotated clockwise in FIG. 8 of the accompanying drawings against the elasticity of a latch spring by the contact with the striker B, and when the latch D rotates up to a half-latched position, a pawl E of the ratchet C is engaged with a half-latch step F of the latch D (refer to FIG. 8 in U.S. Pat. No. 5,618,068). Furthermore, when the latch D reaches a full-latched position, the ratchet C is engaged with a full-latch step G of the latch D (refer to FIG. 9 in U.S. Pat. No. 5,618,068). The latch D is designed to be over-rotatable up to the mechanical rotational limit position exceeding the full-latched position so that the ratchet C can surely be engaged with the full-latch step G (refer to FIG. 10 in U.S. Pat. No. 5,618,068).




When the door is closed, various noises are generated from the door latch device. One of the causes of noise is vibration of the latch D. When the latch D is rotated about a latch shaft H, the latch D vibrates in an axial direction of the latch shaft H to generate rattle noise. If the clearance between the latch D and the latch shaft H is decreased as much as possible, the rattle noise of the latch D can be suppressed. However, a clearance in the neighborhood of zero inhibits a good rotation of the latch D. Furthermore, by providing, to the latch D, a resin projection which comes into sliding contact with a latch body J containing the latch D, the vibration of the latch D in the axial direction of the latch shaft H can also be suppressed. However, the frictional resistance because of the resin projection inhibits a good rotation of the latch D from the unlatched position to the full-latched position.




Furthermore, in many cases, a resin silencer for suppressing the shock noise is attached at the outer peripheral surface of the latch D. The silencer is provided at a part K on the side of the step G, and the silencer suppresses the shock noise generated when the pawl E of the ratchet C collides against the part K of the latch D. However, the silencer cannot reduce the shock noise when the latch D is restored from the over-rotated position (in almost all cases, equal to the mechanical rotational limit position) to the full-latched position and the step G of the latch D collides against the pawl E of the ratchet C. The reason is that the silencer cannot be provided to the step G. If the silencer is provided to the step G, the resin silencer makes the state of engagement between the latch D and the ratchet C unstable. Furthermore, the silencer which may be provided to the step G is extremely worn down by the strong pressure between the latch D and the ratchet C, and therefore, the effect of noise suppression does not last for a long time.




In order to reduce the shock noise when the step G of the latch D collides against the pawl E of the ratchet C, it is effective to weaken the force for over-rotating the latch D. The weakened force reduces the rebounding force applied to the latch D when the latch D is reversed at the mechanical rotational limit position, and consequently, the speed when the step G of the latch D collides against the pawl E is slowed down, and the shock noise is reduced. A rubber stopper L of the latch body J employed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,141,270 is capable of weakening the force for over-rotating the latch D by coming into contact with the striker B. However, the rubber stopper L does not come into contact with the latch D, and therefore, it has no substantial effect for suppressing the vibration of the latch D.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




It is an object of the present invention to provide a vehicle door latch device in which the noise generated when the door is closed is suppressed.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a front view of a door latch device according to the present invention in the unlatched state;





FIG. 2

is a front view of the door latch device in the full-latched state;





FIG. 3

is a front view of the door latch device in the state where the latch has been over-rotated slightly beyond the full-latched position;





FIG. 4

is a front view of the door latch device in the state where the latch has been over-rotated up to the mechanical rotational limit position;





FIG. 5

is a cross sectional view of A—A in

FIG. 2

;





FIG. 6

is an enlarged cross sectional view showing a projection of the latch and a contact pin of a latch body;





FIG. 7

is a cross sectional view showing the projection of the latch seen from the arrow B direction in

FIG. 1

; and





FIG. 8

is a figure of a well-known example disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,141,270.











DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT




As shown in the appended

FIGS. 1

to


7


, the door latch device according to the present invention comprises a latch unit


10


to be attached to a vehicle door (not shown in the figure) and a striker


11


to be fixed to a vehicle body (not shown in the figure). The latch unit


10


has a synthetic resin latch body


12


, a metal cover plate


13


(

FIG. 5

) to be fixed on the front side of the latch body


12


, and a metal back plate


14


(

FIG. 5

) to be fixed on the back side of the latch body


12


. The latch body


12


is provided with a striker groove


15


into which the striker


11


goes, and the cover plate


13


is provided with a notch


16


corresponding to the striker groove


15


.




The latch unit


10


has a metal latch


17


to be engaged with the striker


11


when the door is closed and a metal ratchet


18


which keeps the engagement between the latch


17


and the striker


11


. The latch


17


is rotatably contained in a recess


19


formed in the front side of the latch body


12


with a latch shaft


20


, and the ratchet


18


is rotatably contained in the recess


19


with a ratchet shaft


21


. The front surface of the recess


19


is substantially covered by the cover plate


13


.




The latch


17


is urged in the counterclockwise direction in

FIGS. 1

to


4


by the elasticity of a latch spring (not shown in the figure), and is held at an unlatched position shown in

FIG. 1

when the door is open. The ratchet


18


is urged in the clockwise direction toward the latch


17


by the elasticity of a ratchet spring (not shown in the figure). When the door is moved toward the closed position, the striker


11


goes into the striker groove


15


along the arrow P to come into contact with a U-shaped groove


22


of the latch


17


, and consequently, the latch


17


is rotated clockwise from the unlatched position against the elasticity of the latch spring, and when the latch


17


is rotated up to a half-latched position, a pawl


23


of the ratchet


18


becomes the state of being able to be engaged with a half-latch step


24


of the latch


17


. Furthermore, when the latch


17


reaches a full-latched position (refer to FIG.


2


), the pawl


23


of the ratchet


18


becomes the state of being able to be engaged with a full-latch step


25


of the latch


17


. The latch


17


is designed to be able to be over-rotated up to a mechanical rotational limit position (

FIG. 4

) exceeding the full-latched position so that the pawl


23


of the ratchet


18


can-surely be engaged with the full-latch step


25


. The pawl


23


of the ratchet


18


is, in fact, engaged with the full-latch step


25


of the latch


17


when the latch


17


is returned to the full-latched position after the over-rotation beyond the full-latched position. If the amount of over-rotation of the latch


17


is too small, in some cases, the pawl


23


of the ratchet


18


fails in being engaged with the full-latch step


25


since the rotation of the ratchet


18


by the elasticity of the ratchet spring is too late.




A resin silencer


26


is attached to the latch


17


. The resin silencer


26


reduces the noise when the ratchet


18


collides against the latch


17


, and the noise when the striker


11


collides against the latch


17


. However, normally, the silencer


26


cannot be provided at least to the full-latch step


25


.




The latch body


12


integrally has a resin tongue part


27


. The tongue part


27


has a height by which it can come into contact with an outer periphery part


28


of the latch


17


. The tongue part


27


does not come into contact with the latch


17


when the latch


17


is positioned between the unlatched position (

FIG. 1

) and the full-latched position (FIG.


2


). However, when the latch


17


is over-rotated exceeding the full-latched position, the tongue part


27


comes into contact with the outer peripheral part


28


of the latch


17


to weaken the external force for over-rotating the latch


17


. It is preferable that the tip side of the tongue part


27


is elastically displaced in a direction of the arrow C by contact with the outer peripheral part


28


. The outer peripheral part


28


is one of the parts of the latch


17


which are most separated from the latch shaft


20


, and is positioned on the tip side of a door-closing side horn part


29


which defines a door-closing side wall of the U-shaped groove


22


. The resin tongue part


27


can also suppress the vibration of the latch


17


since it directly comes into contact with the latch


17


.




The latch


17


has a door-opening side horn part


30


which defines a door-opening side wall of the U-shaped groove


22


. A bulged part


31


projecting toward the latch body


12


is formed on the rear side of the horn part


30


. It is preferable that the bulged part


31


is integrally formed with the silencer


26


as one-piece. The bulged part


31


is shaped like a circular arc as shown in

FIG. 7

, and the central part thereof is most projected backward. When the latch


17


is displaced into the full-latched position from the unlatched position as shown in

FIG. 2

, the bulged part


31


crosses the striker groove


15


and moves to the lower side of the latch body


12


on the basis of the striker groove


15


.




To the latch body


12


below the striker groove


15


, a contact pin


32


which can come into contact with the bulged part


31


is provided. The contact pin


32


is extending in parallel with the axial direction of the latch shaft


20


, and is made of a resin. The contact pin


32


comes into contact with the central part of the bulged part


31


of the latch


17


when the latch


17


is positioned at the full-latched position (FIG.


2


), and suppresses the vibration of the latch


17


in the axial direction of the latch shaft


20


. Furthermore, the friction generated by the contact between the bulged part


31


and the contact pin


32


weakens the external force for over-rotating the latch


17


.




Next, the action will be described.




When the door is moved toward the closed position, the striker


11


relatively goes into the striker groove


15


along the arrow P to come into contact with the U-shaped groove


22


of the latch


17


, and consequently, the latch


17


is rotated clockwise from the unlatched position against the elasticity of the latch spring, and it reaches the full-latched position through the half-latched position. Then, when the latch


17


is over-rotated beyond the full-latched position, the ratchet


18


is moved to a position where it can be engaged with the full-latch step


25


of the latch


17


by the elasticity of the ratchet spring as shown in FIG.


3


. After that, the latch


17


is restored toward the full-latched position after the over-rotation up to the mechanical rotational limit position (or a position before that), and the metal full-latch step


25


of the latch


17


is engaged with the metal pawl


23


of the ratchet


18


, and the door is held in the full-latched state.




In the above description, when the latch


17


comes to the full-latched position from the unlatched position by closing the door, the contact pin


32


of the latch body


12


comes into contact with the bulged part


31


of the latch


17


to apply a pressure in the axial direction of the latch shaft


20


to the latch


17


. Therefore, the vibration of the latch


17


in the axial direction of the latch shaft


20


is efficiently suppressed, and the occurrence of noise is reduced. In the present invention, the contact between the contact pin


32


and the bulged part


31


is released when the latch


17


is over-rotated exceeding the full-latched position. However, depending on an experiment, the noise caused by the vibration of the latch


17


is surely reduced. One likely reason for this is that the vibration of the latch


17


in the axial direction of the latch shaft


20


is produced by the collision of the striker


11


against the latch


17


and if the vibration of the latch


17


is suppressed at the full-latched position, the vibration of the latch


17


after that is not substantially increased. Accordingly, it is important that a pressure in the axial direction of the latch shaft


20


is efficiently applied to the latch


17


at the full-latched position.




In addition, the contact between the bulged part


31


and the contact pin


32


works as a rotational resistance of the latch


17


which weakens the external force for over-rotating the latch


17


, and the rebounding force applied to the latch


17


when the latch


17


is reversed at the mechanical rotational limit position is reduced. Therefore, the reversal rotation speed of the latch


17


at the collision of the metal full-latch step


25


against the metal pawl


23


of the ratchet


18


is slowed down, and the shock noise is reduced.




Furthermore, when the latch


17


has been over-rotated exceeding the full-latched position, the tongue part


27


formed on the latch body


12


comes into contact with the outer peripheral part


28


of the latch


17


, and efficiently absorbs the external force for over-rotating the latch


17


so as to reduce the rebounding force applied to the latch


17


when the latch


17


is reversed at the mechanical rotational limit position is reduced. Therefore, the reversal rotation speed of the latch


17


at the collision of the metal full-latch step


25


against the metal pawl


23


of the ratchet


18


is slowed down, and the shock noise to be produced is reduced.




The tongue part


27


comes into contact with the outer peripheral part


28


of the latch


17


differently from the rubber stopper L in FIG.


8


. Accordingly, the tongue part


27


can also suppress the vibration of the latch


17


in the axial direction of the latch shaft


20


.




The rotational resistance of the latch


17


based on the contact between the bulged part


31


and the contact pin


32


, and the rotational resistance of the latch


17


based on the contact between the tongue part


27


and the outer peripheral part


28


are applied to the latch


17


when the latch


17


is substantially in the over-rotated state, and accordingly, a good rotation of the latch


17


from the unlatched position to the full-latched position is not inhibited.




Advantages




In the present invention, when the latch


17


is positioned at the full-latched position, a pressure in the axial direction of the latch shaft


20


is applied to the side of the latch


17


by the contact pin


32


, and when the latch


17


is over-rotated exceeding the full-latched position, a pressure in the anti-rotational direction is applied to the latch


17


by the tongue part


27


. Consequently, both the noise based on the vibration of the latch


17


and the noise based on the return speed of the latch


17


are reasonably reduced.



Claims
  • 1. A vehicle door latch device comprising:a latch body having a recess at a front side thereof; a latch rotatably supported by a latch shaft in the recess and engageable with a striker fixed to a vehicle body; a ratchet rotatably supported by a ratchet shaft in the recess for keeping an engagement between the latch and the striker by being engaged with the latch; a tongue part provided to the latch body and arranged to come into contact with an outer peripheral part of the latch; a contact pin provided to the latch body and arranged to come into contact with the latch; said tongue part applying a first external force in an anti-rotational direction of the latch to the latch by coming into contact with the outer peripheral part of the latch; and said contact pin applying a second external force in a axial direction of the latch shaft to the latch by coming into contact with the latch.
  • 2. The vehicle door latch device according to claim 1, wherein said tongue part comes into contact with the outer peripheral part when the latch is over-rotated exceeding a full-latched position.
  • 3. The vehicle door latch device according to claim 2, wherein said outer peripheral part is provided at a door-closing side horn part which defines a door-closing side wall of a U-shaped groove of the latch to be engaged with the striker.
  • 4. The vehicle door latch device according to claim 1, wherein said contact pin comes into contact with a side of the latch when the latch is positioned at a full-latched position.
  • 5. The vehicle door latch device according to claim 4, wherein said tongue part comes into contact with the outer peripheral part when the latch is over-rotated exceeding the full-latched position.
  • 6. The vehicle door larch device according to claim 4, wherein said contact pin comes into contact with a door-opening side horn part which defines a door-opening side wall of a U-shaped groove of the latch to be engaged with the striker.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
2001-289469 Sep 2001 JP
US Referenced Citations (8)
Number Name Date Kind
2694591 Anschuetz Nov 1954 A
3917330 Quantz Nov 1975 A
4358141 Hamada Nov 1982 A
4854617 Hayakawa et al. Aug 1989 A
5141270 Shibata Aug 1992 A
5520426 Arabia et al. May 1996 A
5618068 Mitsui et al. Apr 1997 A
6024389 Arabia et al. Feb 2000 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
2 226 849 Nov 1990 GB