Information
-
Patent Grant
-
6749234
-
Patent Number
6,749,234
-
Date Filed
Monday, September 23, 200222 years ago
-
Date Issued
Tuesday, June 15, 200420 years ago
-
Inventors
-
Original Assignees
-
Examiners
Agents
-
CPC
-
US Classifications
Field of Search
US
- 292 216
- 292 DIG 56
- 292 DIG 57
- 292 DIG 73
-
International Classifications
-
Abstract
A vehicle door latch device comprises a latch body, a latch provided in a recess of a latch body, and a ratchet provided in the recess. The latch body has a tongue part which comes into contact with an outer peripheral part of the latch, and a contact pin which comes into contact with the latch. The tongue part applies a first external force in an anti-rotational direction of the latch to the latch by contact with the outer peripheral part of the latch, and the contact pin applies a second external force in a axial direction of the latch shaft to the latch by contact with the latch. The tongue part comes into contact with the outer peripheral part when the latch is over-rotated exceeding a full-latched position.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a vehicle door latch device and, more particularly, to a door latch device in which rattle of a latch to be engaged with a striker is prevented.
DESCRIPTION OF THE RELATED ART
As shown in
FIG. 8
, a conventional door latch device comprises a latch unit A attached to a vehicle door and a striker B fixed to a vehicle body (refer to U.S. Pat. No. 5,141,270). The closed state of a door is held in such a way where a ratchet C of the latch unit A is engaged with a latch D of the latch unit A to keep the engagement between the latch D and the striker B.
The latch D is rotatable to an over-rotated position from an unlatched position by the contact with the striker B. The situation from the unlatched position to the over-rotated position of the latch D is well shown in FIGS. 7 to 10 of U.S. Pat. No. 5,618,068. When the door is moved toward the closed position, the latch D is rotated clockwise in FIG. 8 of the accompanying drawings against the elasticity of a latch spring by the contact with the striker B, and when the latch D rotates up to a half-latched position, a pawl E of the ratchet C is engaged with a half-latch step F of the latch D (refer to FIG. 8 in U.S. Pat. No. 5,618,068). Furthermore, when the latch D reaches a full-latched position, the ratchet C is engaged with a full-latch step G of the latch D (refer to FIG. 9 in U.S. Pat. No. 5,618,068). The latch D is designed to be over-rotatable up to the mechanical rotational limit position exceeding the full-latched position so that the ratchet C can surely be engaged with the full-latch step G (refer to FIG. 10 in U.S. Pat. No. 5,618,068).
When the door is closed, various noises are generated from the door latch device. One of the causes of noise is vibration of the latch D. When the latch D is rotated about a latch shaft H, the latch D vibrates in an axial direction of the latch shaft H to generate rattle noise. If the clearance between the latch D and the latch shaft H is decreased as much as possible, the rattle noise of the latch D can be suppressed. However, a clearance in the neighborhood of zero inhibits a good rotation of the latch D. Furthermore, by providing, to the latch D, a resin projection which comes into sliding contact with a latch body J containing the latch D, the vibration of the latch D in the axial direction of the latch shaft H can also be suppressed. However, the frictional resistance because of the resin projection inhibits a good rotation of the latch D from the unlatched position to the full-latched position.
Furthermore, in many cases, a resin silencer for suppressing the shock noise is attached at the outer peripheral surface of the latch D. The silencer is provided at a part K on the side of the step G, and the silencer suppresses the shock noise generated when the pawl E of the ratchet C collides against the part K of the latch D. However, the silencer cannot reduce the shock noise when the latch D is restored from the over-rotated position (in almost all cases, equal to the mechanical rotational limit position) to the full-latched position and the step G of the latch D collides against the pawl E of the ratchet C. The reason is that the silencer cannot be provided to the step G. If the silencer is provided to the step G, the resin silencer makes the state of engagement between the latch D and the ratchet C unstable. Furthermore, the silencer which may be provided to the step G is extremely worn down by the strong pressure between the latch D and the ratchet C, and therefore, the effect of noise suppression does not last for a long time.
In order to reduce the shock noise when the step G of the latch D collides against the pawl E of the ratchet C, it is effective to weaken the force for over-rotating the latch D. The weakened force reduces the rebounding force applied to the latch D when the latch D is reversed at the mechanical rotational limit position, and consequently, the speed when the step G of the latch D collides against the pawl E is slowed down, and the shock noise is reduced. A rubber stopper L of the latch body J employed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,141,270 is capable of weakening the force for over-rotating the latch D by coming into contact with the striker B. However, the rubber stopper L does not come into contact with the latch D, and therefore, it has no substantial effect for suppressing the vibration of the latch D.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of the present invention to provide a vehicle door latch device in which the noise generated when the door is closed is suppressed.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1
is a front view of a door latch device according to the present invention in the unlatched state;
FIG. 2
is a front view of the door latch device in the full-latched state;
FIG. 3
is a front view of the door latch device in the state where the latch has been over-rotated slightly beyond the full-latched position;
FIG. 4
is a front view of the door latch device in the state where the latch has been over-rotated up to the mechanical rotational limit position;
FIG. 5
is a cross sectional view of A—A in
FIG. 2
;
FIG. 6
is an enlarged cross sectional view showing a projection of the latch and a contact pin of a latch body;
FIG. 7
is a cross sectional view showing the projection of the latch seen from the arrow B direction in
FIG. 1
; and
FIG. 8
is a figure of a well-known example disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,141,270.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
As shown in the appended
FIGS. 1
to
7
, the door latch device according to the present invention comprises a latch unit
10
to be attached to a vehicle door (not shown in the figure) and a striker
11
to be fixed to a vehicle body (not shown in the figure). The latch unit
10
has a synthetic resin latch body
12
, a metal cover plate
13
(
FIG. 5
) to be fixed on the front side of the latch body
12
, and a metal back plate
14
(
FIG. 5
) to be fixed on the back side of the latch body
12
. The latch body
12
is provided with a striker groove
15
into which the striker
11
goes, and the cover plate
13
is provided with a notch
16
corresponding to the striker groove
15
.
The latch unit
10
has a metal latch
17
to be engaged with the striker
11
when the door is closed and a metal ratchet
18
which keeps the engagement between the latch
17
and the striker
11
. The latch
17
is rotatably contained in a recess
19
formed in the front side of the latch body
12
with a latch shaft
20
, and the ratchet
18
is rotatably contained in the recess
19
with a ratchet shaft
21
. The front surface of the recess
19
is substantially covered by the cover plate
13
.
The latch
17
is urged in the counterclockwise direction in
FIGS. 1
to
4
by the elasticity of a latch spring (not shown in the figure), and is held at an unlatched position shown in
FIG. 1
when the door is open. The ratchet
18
is urged in the clockwise direction toward the latch
17
by the elasticity of a ratchet spring (not shown in the figure). When the door is moved toward the closed position, the striker
11
goes into the striker groove
15
along the arrow P to come into contact with a U-shaped groove
22
of the latch
17
, and consequently, the latch
17
is rotated clockwise from the unlatched position against the elasticity of the latch spring, and when the latch
17
is rotated up to a half-latched position, a pawl
23
of the ratchet
18
becomes the state of being able to be engaged with a half-latch step
24
of the latch
17
. Furthermore, when the latch
17
reaches a full-latched position (refer to FIG.
2
), the pawl
23
of the ratchet
18
becomes the state of being able to be engaged with a full-latch step
25
of the latch
17
. The latch
17
is designed to be able to be over-rotated up to a mechanical rotational limit position (
FIG. 4
) exceeding the full-latched position so that the pawl
23
of the ratchet
18
can-surely be engaged with the full-latch step
25
. The pawl
23
of the ratchet
18
is, in fact, engaged with the full-latch step
25
of the latch
17
when the latch
17
is returned to the full-latched position after the over-rotation beyond the full-latched position. If the amount of over-rotation of the latch
17
is too small, in some cases, the pawl
23
of the ratchet
18
fails in being engaged with the full-latch step
25
since the rotation of the ratchet
18
by the elasticity of the ratchet spring is too late.
A resin silencer
26
is attached to the latch
17
. The resin silencer
26
reduces the noise when the ratchet
18
collides against the latch
17
, and the noise when the striker
11
collides against the latch
17
. However, normally, the silencer
26
cannot be provided at least to the full-latch step
25
.
The latch body
12
integrally has a resin tongue part
27
. The tongue part
27
has a height by which it can come into contact with an outer periphery part
28
of the latch
17
. The tongue part
27
does not come into contact with the latch
17
when the latch
17
is positioned between the unlatched position (
FIG. 1
) and the full-latched position (FIG.
2
). However, when the latch
17
is over-rotated exceeding the full-latched position, the tongue part
27
comes into contact with the outer peripheral part
28
of the latch
17
to weaken the external force for over-rotating the latch
17
. It is preferable that the tip side of the tongue part
27
is elastically displaced in a direction of the arrow C by contact with the outer peripheral part
28
. The outer peripheral part
28
is one of the parts of the latch
17
which are most separated from the latch shaft
20
, and is positioned on the tip side of a door-closing side horn part
29
which defines a door-closing side wall of the U-shaped groove
22
. The resin tongue part
27
can also suppress the vibration of the latch
17
since it directly comes into contact with the latch
17
.
The latch
17
has a door-opening side horn part
30
which defines a door-opening side wall of the U-shaped groove
22
. A bulged part
31
projecting toward the latch body
12
is formed on the rear side of the horn part
30
. It is preferable that the bulged part
31
is integrally formed with the silencer
26
as one-piece. The bulged part
31
is shaped like a circular arc as shown in
FIG. 7
, and the central part thereof is most projected backward. When the latch
17
is displaced into the full-latched position from the unlatched position as shown in
FIG. 2
, the bulged part
31
crosses the striker groove
15
and moves to the lower side of the latch body
12
on the basis of the striker groove
15
.
To the latch body
12
below the striker groove
15
, a contact pin
32
which can come into contact with the bulged part
31
is provided. The contact pin
32
is extending in parallel with the axial direction of the latch shaft
20
, and is made of a resin. The contact pin
32
comes into contact with the central part of the bulged part
31
of the latch
17
when the latch
17
is positioned at the full-latched position (FIG.
2
), and suppresses the vibration of the latch
17
in the axial direction of the latch shaft
20
. Furthermore, the friction generated by the contact between the bulged part
31
and the contact pin
32
weakens the external force for over-rotating the latch
17
.
Next, the action will be described.
When the door is moved toward the closed position, the striker
11
relatively goes into the striker groove
15
along the arrow P to come into contact with the U-shaped groove
22
of the latch
17
, and consequently, the latch
17
is rotated clockwise from the unlatched position against the elasticity of the latch spring, and it reaches the full-latched position through the half-latched position. Then, when the latch
17
is over-rotated beyond the full-latched position, the ratchet
18
is moved to a position where it can be engaged with the full-latch step
25
of the latch
17
by the elasticity of the ratchet spring as shown in FIG.
3
. After that, the latch
17
is restored toward the full-latched position after the over-rotation up to the mechanical rotational limit position (or a position before that), and the metal full-latch step
25
of the latch
17
is engaged with the metal pawl
23
of the ratchet
18
, and the door is held in the full-latched state.
In the above description, when the latch
17
comes to the full-latched position from the unlatched position by closing the door, the contact pin
32
of the latch body
12
comes into contact with the bulged part
31
of the latch
17
to apply a pressure in the axial direction of the latch shaft
20
to the latch
17
. Therefore, the vibration of the latch
17
in the axial direction of the latch shaft
20
is efficiently suppressed, and the occurrence of noise is reduced. In the present invention, the contact between the contact pin
32
and the bulged part
31
is released when the latch
17
is over-rotated exceeding the full-latched position. However, depending on an experiment, the noise caused by the vibration of the latch
17
is surely reduced. One likely reason for this is that the vibration of the latch
17
in the axial direction of the latch shaft
20
is produced by the collision of the striker
11
against the latch
17
and if the vibration of the latch
17
is suppressed at the full-latched position, the vibration of the latch
17
after that is not substantially increased. Accordingly, it is important that a pressure in the axial direction of the latch shaft
20
is efficiently applied to the latch
17
at the full-latched position.
In addition, the contact between the bulged part
31
and the contact pin
32
works as a rotational resistance of the latch
17
which weakens the external force for over-rotating the latch
17
, and the rebounding force applied to the latch
17
when the latch
17
is reversed at the mechanical rotational limit position is reduced. Therefore, the reversal rotation speed of the latch
17
at the collision of the metal full-latch step
25
against the metal pawl
23
of the ratchet
18
is slowed down, and the shock noise is reduced.
Furthermore, when the latch
17
has been over-rotated exceeding the full-latched position, the tongue part
27
formed on the latch body
12
comes into contact with the outer peripheral part
28
of the latch
17
, and efficiently absorbs the external force for over-rotating the latch
17
so as to reduce the rebounding force applied to the latch
17
when the latch
17
is reversed at the mechanical rotational limit position is reduced. Therefore, the reversal rotation speed of the latch
17
at the collision of the metal full-latch step
25
against the metal pawl
23
of the ratchet
18
is slowed down, and the shock noise to be produced is reduced.
The tongue part
27
comes into contact with the outer peripheral part
28
of the latch
17
differently from the rubber stopper L in FIG.
8
. Accordingly, the tongue part
27
can also suppress the vibration of the latch
17
in the axial direction of the latch shaft
20
.
The rotational resistance of the latch
17
based on the contact between the bulged part
31
and the contact pin
32
, and the rotational resistance of the latch
17
based on the contact between the tongue part
27
and the outer peripheral part
28
are applied to the latch
17
when the latch
17
is substantially in the over-rotated state, and accordingly, a good rotation of the latch
17
from the unlatched position to the full-latched position is not inhibited.
Advantages
In the present invention, when the latch
17
is positioned at the full-latched position, a pressure in the axial direction of the latch shaft
20
is applied to the side of the latch
17
by the contact pin
32
, and when the latch
17
is over-rotated exceeding the full-latched position, a pressure in the anti-rotational direction is applied to the latch
17
by the tongue part
27
. Consequently, both the noise based on the vibration of the latch
17
and the noise based on the return speed of the latch
17
are reasonably reduced.
Claims
- 1. A vehicle door latch device comprising:a latch body having a recess at a front side thereof; a latch rotatably supported by a latch shaft in the recess and engageable with a striker fixed to a vehicle body; a ratchet rotatably supported by a ratchet shaft in the recess for keeping an engagement between the latch and the striker by being engaged with the latch; a tongue part provided to the latch body and arranged to come into contact with an outer peripheral part of the latch; a contact pin provided to the latch body and arranged to come into contact with the latch; said tongue part applying a first external force in an anti-rotational direction of the latch to the latch by coming into contact with the outer peripheral part of the latch; and said contact pin applying a second external force in a axial direction of the latch shaft to the latch by coming into contact with the latch.
- 2. The vehicle door latch device according to claim 1, wherein said tongue part comes into contact with the outer peripheral part when the latch is over-rotated exceeding a full-latched position.
- 3. The vehicle door latch device according to claim 2, wherein said outer peripheral part is provided at a door-closing side horn part which defines a door-closing side wall of a U-shaped groove of the latch to be engaged with the striker.
- 4. The vehicle door latch device according to claim 1, wherein said contact pin comes into contact with a side of the latch when the latch is positioned at a full-latched position.
- 5. The vehicle door latch device according to claim 4, wherein said tongue part comes into contact with the outer peripheral part when the latch is over-rotated exceeding the full-latched position.
- 6. The vehicle door larch device according to claim 4, wherein said contact pin comes into contact with a door-opening side horn part which defines a door-opening side wall of a U-shaped groove of the latch to be engaged with the striker.
Priority Claims (1)
Number |
Date |
Country |
Kind |
2001-289469 |
Sep 2001 |
JP |
|
US Referenced Citations (8)
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number |
Date |
Country |
2 226 849 |
Nov 1990 |
GB |