1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to the prediction of dynamics of a vehicle and, more particularly, to a recursive method for predicting vehicle dynamics using information about a path on which the vehicle is travelling for enhancing active safety performance of the vehicle and to improve driver comfort.
2. Description of the Related Art
Most modern vehicles are equipped with vehicle control (VC) systems that enhance the safety and comfort of the occupants of the vehicle. VC systems constantly monitor and control, if required, various vehicle parameters, such as yaw, side-slip and roll of the vehicle. In general, sensors are used to monitor vehicle parameters, such as those mentioned above, along with certain driver inputs, such as rotation of the steering wheel and brake and throttle applications. VC systems receive signals from these sensors and keep the vehicle stable and under control by taking certain actions.
It can be said that the VC systems currently found in the art are largely feedback based. The feedback mechanism of such systems sometimes makes them slow to respond in real time situations. In other situations, a quick and aggressive control action taken by the VC system in response to signals from the sensors can lead to discomfort of the driver and other occupants, and also to the vehicle going out of control. Keeping in mind the above-mentioned concerns, VC systems can be made more effective by incorporating early prediction of dynamic states of the vehicle, such as vehicle spinning and rollover.
One existing method for predicting the dynamics of a vehicle only makes use of the conventional on-board vehicle sensors, such as vehicle speed sensors, lateral and longitudinal acceleration sensors, steering angle sensors and yaw-rate sensors, to make the predictions. However, the inability of a technique to base this prediction on other sensor inputs, such as lane/path from vision and GPS/map database, compromises the system's ability and results in an unreliable prediction.
Another known method for predicting the dynamics of a vehicle makes use of a mathematical model. However, this method assumes the steering angle to be constant for a pre-determined time period in the future, which is seldom the case. Further, the method does not take into account the corrections made by the driver and different driving styles.
Another known method for predicting and compensating the dynamics of a vehicle makes use of the transmission of information between two vehicles. Vehicle control systems base their response on information received from a vehicle travelling just ahead of the concerned vehicle. However, this method may not be practical for predicting vehicle dynamics due to its naturally small bandwidth and slow response compared to fast vehicle dynamics.
In accordance with the teachings of the present invention, a recursive method for predicting the dynamics of a vehicle using information about the path on which the vehicle is travelling is disclosed that has particular application in enhancing active safety performance of the vehicle, improving driver comfort and improving vehicle dynamics control. The method includes generating a preview of a path to be followed by the vehicle, where the preview of the path is generated based on actual values of a plurality of vehicle parameters. The method further includes obtaining a corrected value of at least one of the plurality of vehicle parameters corresponding to the actual values of each of the vehicle parameters, where the corrected value is obtained based on a target path to be followed by the vehicle on the road, where the target path is obtained based on a plurality of road parameters. Further, the dynamic state of the vehicle is predicted based on the corrected value, and the steps for generating the preview of the path, obtaining the corrected value and predicting the dynamic state of the vehicle are repeated after a pre-determined time interval with the actual values of the vehicle parameters being replaced by the corrected values.
Additional features of the present invention will become apparent from the following description and appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The following discussion of the embodiments of the invention directed to a system and method for predicting dynamics of a vehicle moving on a road is merely exemplary in nature, and is in no way intended to limit the invention or its applications or uses. For example, the method has specific application in enhancing active safety performance of a vehicle having predictive vehicle controls, such as curve speed control, adaptive cruise control, lane keeping and lane changing/centering controls. However, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the method for predicting the dynamics of a vehicle moving on a road may have other applications.
At block 16, a target path to be followed by the vehicle is obtained. The target path is the ideal or the best possible path or lane that the vehicle can take on the road and is determined based on signals received from equipment that provides information about road parameters, such as a camera, a global positioning system (GPS) and/or a database of digital maps. At block 18, a steering input correction is estimated, which is the difference between the steering input or the hand-wheel angle as obtained at block 12 and a future steering input that should be given to the vehicle so that it follows the target path. Prediction of the future steering input is provided by minimizing the deviation between the previewed path and the target path. In one embodiment, the minimization of deviation between the previewed path and the target path is provided using an optimal control approach, as will be described below. At block 20, the vehicle dynamics are predicted based on the predicted steering input, and the updated vehicle velocity and vehicle yaw rate. The calculations involved at this step are similar to those used at the block 14. The method for predicting the vehicle dynamics, according to one embodiment, will be described below.
It will be readily apparent to a person of ordinary skill in the art that a future value of a parameter other than the steering input can be predicted at the block 18 and in turn can be used for the prediction of vehicle dynamics at the block 20. The above-mentioned steps are repeated for the prediction of the vehicle dynamics after a pre-determined interval of time. The vehicle is virtually moved using coordinate transform at block 22 and a new set of vehicle coordinates is obtained. The target path is now taken with respect to the new vehicle coordinates obtained at the block 22. Further, the predicted values of the vehicle state parameters, obtained during the vehicle dynamics prediction at the block 20, are now initial values used for previewing the path of the vehicle at 14.
Where a is the distance between the vehicle front axle and the vehicle center of gravity, b is the distance between the vehicle rear axle and the vehicle center of gravity, Cf is the vehicle front tire cornering stiffness, Cr is the vehicle rear tire cornering stiffness, Iz is the vehicle moment of inertia with respect to the center of gravity, L is the feedback gain of the state observer, m is the mass of the vehicle, δf is the vehicle front wheel angle and δr is the vehicle rear wheel angle.
The vehicle state signal from the vehicle dynamics estimation at the block 26 is then sent to block 28 for vehicle kinematics estimation. Vehicle kinematics estimation can be used to predict where the vehicle is heading with respect to a fixed vehicle coordinate system (X, Y). This is done using the following equations.
{circumflex over ({dot over (Y)}=v
x·sin({circumflex over (ψ)})+{circumflex over (v)}y·cos({circumflex over (ψ)}) (2)
{circumflex over ({dot over (X)}=v
x·cos({circumflex over (ψ)})−{circumflex over (v)}y·sin({circumflex over (ψ)}) (3)
{circumflex over ({dot over (ψ)}=r (4)
Where {circumflex over (ψ)} is the yaw angle of the vehicle. Thus, the predicted vehicle trajectory or the previewed path can be calculated as:
ŷ(t)=F(t){circumflex over (x)}0+g(t)U (7)
The previewed vehicle path ŷ(t) is then sent to block 34 where along with the target path y it is used to generate a cost function J using equation (8).
The cost function J represents the deviation between the previewed path ŷ(t) and the target path y. Thus, the prediction of the future steering input using the optimal control approach involves minimization of the deviation between the previewed path ŷ(t) and the target path, that is, minimizing the cost function J to calculate a steering input correction. Equation (8) is a second order quadratic, thus a partial derivative of the cost function J will go to zero when the cost function J is minimized. The partial derivative of the cost function J is taken at block 36 and an optimal control signal U is used at block 38 as the predicted steering input {circumflex over (δ)}sw(ti˜ti+1) given by:
{circumflex over (δ)}sw(ti˜ti−1)=δsw(ti)+Δ{circumflex over (δ)}sw(ti) (9)
Where {circumflex over (δ)}sw(ti˜ti+1) is the predicted steering input between time ti and ti+1, δsw(ti) is the steering input at time ti and Δ{circumflex over (δ)}sw(ti) is the steering input correction at time ti.
The optimal control signal U is given by:
Where Fi and gi are the free-response array and the forced-response array, respectively, and N is the number of sampling points used during the preview time period. The definition of N is given more clearly in
Various embodiments of the present invention offer one or more advantages. The method of the present invention provides improved vehicle dynamics control performance by reducing or eliminating harsh and aggressive actuations of vehicle control systems, and therefore, improves driver comfort. The method also enhances active safety performance with predictive vehicle controls, such as curve speed control, adaptive cruise control, lane keeping and lane changing/centering controls.
The foregoing discussion discloses and describes merely exemplary embodiments of the present invention. One skilled in the art will readily recognize from such discussion and from the accompanying drawings and claims that various changes, modifications and variations can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the following claims.