Vehicle electrical system tester with encoded output

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6445158
  • Patent Number
    6,445,158
  • Date Filed
    Monday, May 22, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 3, 2002
    22 years ago
Abstract
An automotive vehicle electrical system tester includes a starter motor or charging system voltage measurement circuit configured to measure a voltage of an electrical system of a vehicle. A microprocessor is configured to diagnose the electrical system as a function of the measured voltage and responsively output the diagnosed condition on a display. The microprocessor is further configured to encrypt the diagnosed condition and responsively output encrypted information related to the condition.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to devices for testing an automotive vehicle. More specifically, the present invention relates to a battery charging system tester for an automotive vehicle.




Automotive vehicles include a storage battery for operating electronics in the vehicle and using an electric starter to start the vehicle engine. A battery charging system is coupled to the engine and is powered by the engine when the vehicle is running. The charging system is used to charge the storage battery when the vehicle is operating.




Many attempts have been made to test the battery of the vehicle. One technique which has been pioneered by Dr. Keith S. Champlin and Midtronics, Inc. of Burr Ridge, Ill. relates to measuring the conductance of batteries to determine their condition. This technique is described in a number of United States patents, for example, U.S. Patent Nos. U.S. Pat. No. 3,873,911, issued Mar. 25, 1975, to Champlin, entitled ELECTRONIC BATTERY TESTING DEVICE; U.S. Pat. No. 3,909,708, issued Sep. 30, 1975, to Champlin, entitled ELECTRONIC BATTERY TESTING DEVICE; U.S. Pat. No. 4,816,768, issued Mar. 28, 1989, to Champlin, entitled ELECTRONIC BATTERY TESTING DEVICE; U.S. Pat. No. 4,825,170, issued Apr. 25, 1989, to Champlin, entitled ELECTRONIC BATTERY TESTING DEVICE WITH AUTOMATIC VOLTAGE SCALING; U.S. Pat. No. 4,881,038, issued Nov. 14, 1989, to Champlin, entitled ELECTRONIC BATTERY TESTING DEVICE WITH AUTOMATIC VOLTAGE SCALING TO DETERMINE DYNAMIC CONDUCTANCE; U.S. Pat. No. 4,912,416, issued Mar. 27, 1990, to Champlin, entitled ELECTRONIC BATTERY TESTING DEVICE WITH STATE-OF-CHARGE COMPENSATION; U.S. Pat. No. 5,140,269, issued Aug. 18, 1992, to Champlin, entitled ELECTRONIC TESTER FOR ASSESSING BATTERY/CELL CAPACITY; U.S. Pat. No. 5,343,380, issued Aug. 30, 1994, entitled METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SUPPRESSING TIME VARYING SIGNALS IN BATTERIES UNDERGOING CHARGING OR DISCHARGING; U.S. Pat. No. 5,572,136, issued Nov. 5, 1996, entitled ELECTRONIC BATTERY TESTER WITH AUTOMATIC COMPENSATION FOR LOW STATE-OF-CHARGE; U.S. Pat. No. 5,574,355, issued Nov. 12, 1996, entitled METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETECTION AND CONTROL OF THERMAL RUNAWAY IN A BATTERY UNDER CHARGE; U.S. Pat. No. 5,585,728, issued Dec. 17, 1996, entitled ELECTRONIC BATTERY TESTER WITH AUTOMATIC COMPENSATION FOR LOW STATE-OF-CHARGE; U.S. Pat. No. 5,592,093, issued Jan. 7, 1997, entitled ELECTRONIC BATTERY TESTING DEVICE LOOSE TERMINAL CONNECTION DETECTION VIA A COMPARISON CIRCUIT; U.S. Pat. No. 5,598,098, issued Jan. 28, 1997, entitled ELECTRONIC BATTERY TESTER WITH VERY HIGH NOISE IMMUNITY; U.S. Pat. No. 5,757,192, issued May 26, 1998, entitled METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETECTING A BAD CELL IN A STORAGE BATTERY; U.S. Pat. No. 5,821,756, issued Oct. 13, 1998, entitled ELECTRONIC BATTERY TESTER WITH TAILORED COMPENSATION FOR LOW STATE-OF-CHARGE; U.S. Pat. No. 5,831,435, issued Nov. 3, 1998, entitled BATTERY TESTER FOR JIS STANDARD; U.S. Pat. No. 5,914,605, issued Jun. 22, 1999, entitled ELECTRONIC BATTERY TESTER; U.S. Pat. No. 5,945,829, issued Aug. 31, 1999, entitled MIDPOINT BATTERY MONITORING; U.S. Pat. No. 6,002,238, issued Dec. 14, 1999, entitled METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MEASURING COMPLEX IMPEDANCE OF CELLS AND BATTERIES; U.S. Pat. No. 6,037,777, issued Mar. 14, 2000, entitled METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING BATTERY PROPERTIES FROM COMPLEX IMPEDANCE/ADMITTANCE; and U.S. Pat. No. 6,051,976, issued Apr. 18, 2000, entitled METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR AUDITING A BATTERY TEST.




With the advent of accurate battery testing, it has become apparent that in some instances the battery in the vehicle may be good, and a problem related to the battery charging system is the cause of the perceived battery failure. A vehicle charging system generally includes the battery, an alternator, a regulator and an alternator drive belt. In most modern vehicles, the regulator is built into the alternator housing and is referred to as an internal regulator. The role of the charging system is two fold. First, the alternator provides charging current for the battery. This charging current ensures that the battery remains charged while the vehicle is being driven and therefore will have sufficient capacity to subsequently start the engine. Second, the alternator provides an output current for all of the vehicle electrical loads. In general, the alternator output, the battery capacity, the starter draw and the vehicle electrical load requirements are matched to each other for optimal performance. In a properly functioning charging system, the alternator will be capable of outputting enough current to drive the vehicle electrical loads while simultaneously charging the battery. Typically, alternators range in size from 60 to 120 amps.




A number of charging system testers have been used to evaluate the performance of the vehicle charging system. These testers generally use an inductive “amp clamp.” The amp clamp is placed around a cable or wire and inductively couples to the cable or wire such that the current passing through the wire can be measured. This measurement can be made without having to disconnect the wire. In such a system, typically the operator determines the rated size of the alternator. Next, the operator connects the amp clamp to the output cable of the alternator and an electrical load such as a carbon pile load tester, is placed across the battery. This is a large resistive load capable of receiving several hundred amps which will force the alternator to provide its maximum output. The maximum output current can then be measured using the amp clamp connection. If the measured output is less than the rated output, the alternator is determined to be malfunctioning. Such a test is cumbersome as the equipment is large and difficult to handle. Further, it is difficult, particularly with compact engines, to reach the alternator output cable. Further, in some cases, the amp clamp may not fit around the output cable. It is also very easy to place the amp clamp around the wrong cable causing a false test.




Another testing technique is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,207,611, which issued Jun. 10, 1980 and is entitled APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CALIBRATED TESTING OF A VEHICLE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM. The device described in this reference monitors voltage changes present at the cigarette lighter of an automotive vehicle in order to determine the condition of the alternator by applying internal loads such as head lamps and blowers, while the engine is running.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




An automotive vehicle electrical system tester includes a starter motor or charging system voltage measurement circuit configured to measure a voltage of an electrical system of a vehicle. A microprocessor is configured to diagnose the electrical system as a function of the measured voltage and responsively output the diagnosed condition on a display. The microprocessor is further configured to encrypt the diagnosed condition and responsively output an encrypted condition.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a simplified block diagram of an automotive battery charging system tester in accordance with the present invention.





FIG. 2

is a simplified flow chart showing steps in a battery test.





FIG. 3

is a simplified flow chart showing steps in a starter test.





FIG. 4

is a simplified flow chart showing steps in a charging system test.





FIG. 5

is a simplified flow chart showing further steps in the charging system test of FIG.


4


.





FIG. 6

is a simplified flow chart showing steps in a diesel engine charging system test.





FIG. 7

is a simplified flow chart showing steps to remove surface charge.





FIG. 8

is a simplified flow chart showing a ripple test.





FIG. 9

is a simplified block diagram showing generation of an audit code in accordance with one aspect of the invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS





FIG. 1

is a simplified block diagram of a battery charging system tester


10


in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention coupled to a vehicle


12


. Vehicle


12


includes a battery


14


having positive and negative terminals, an alternator with internal regulator


16


, various vehicle loads


18


, and a starter motor


20


. In operation, battery


14


provides power to starter


20


and vehicle loads


18


when the engine in vehicle


12


is not running. When the engine in vehicle


12


is running, alternator


16


is used to power vehicle loads


18


and provide a charging current to battery


14


to maintain the charge of battery


14


.




Charging system tester


10


includes a microprocessor


30


which controls operation of tester


10


and provides instructions and test result information to an operator through, for example, a display


32


. Tester


10


includes a battery testing section


34


which is illustrated generally as conductance amplifier


36


. Section


34


operates in accordance with, for example, the conductance based battery testing techniques described in Champlin patents U.S. Patent Nos. U.S. Pat. No. 3,873,911, issued Mar. 25, 1975, to Champlin, entitled ELECTRONIC BATTERY TESTING DEVICE; U.S. Pat. No. 3,909,708, issued Sep. 30, 1975, to Champlin, entitled ELECTRONIC BATTERY TESTING DEVICE; U.S. Pat. No. 4,816,768, issued Mar. 28, 1989, to Champlin, entitled ELECTRONIC BATTERY TESTING DEVICE; U.S. Pat. No. 4,825,170, issued Apr. 25, 1989, to Champlin, entitled ELECTRONIC BATTERY TESTING DEVICE WITH AUTOMATIC VOLTAGE SCALING; U.S. Pat. No. 4,881,038, issued Nov. 14, 1989, to Champlin, entitled ELECTRONIC BATTERY TESTING DEVICE WITH AUTOMATIC VOLTAGE SCALING TO DETERMINE DYNAMIC CONDUCTANCE; U.S. Pat. No. 4,912,416, issued Mar. 27, 1990, to Champlin, entitled ELECTRONIC BATTERY TESTING DEVICE WITH STATE-OF-CHARGE COMPENSATION; U.S. Pat. No. 5,140,269, issued Aug. 18, 1992, to Champlin, entitled ELECTRONIC TESTER FOR ASSESSING BATTERY/CELL CAPACITY; U.S. Pat. No. 5,343,380, issued Aug. 30, 1994, entitled METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SUPPRESSING TIME VARYING SIGNALS IN BATTERIES UNDERGOING CHARGING OR DISCHARGING; U.S. Pat. No. 5,572,136, issued Nov. 5, 1996, entitled ELECTRONIC BATTERY TESTER WITH AUTOMATIC COMPENSATION FOR LOW STATE-OF-CHARGE; U.S. Pat. No. 5,585,728, issued Dec. 17, 1996, entitled ELECTRONIC BATTERY TESTER WITH AUTOMATIC COMPENSATION FOR LOW STATE-OF-CHARGE; U.S. Pat. No. 5,598,098, issued Jan. 28, 1997, entitled ELECTRONIC BATTERY TESTER WITH VERY HIGH NOISE IMMUNITY; U.S. Pat. No. 5,821,756, issued Oct. 13, 1998, entitled ELECTRONIC BATTERY TESTER WITH TAILORED COMPENSATION FOR LOW STATE-OF-CHARGE. Section


34


is illustrated in very simplified form and conductance amplifier


36


provides an output to an analog to digital converter


38


which is related to the internal conductance of battery


14


.




A DC voltage sensor


40


includes voltage scaling resistors


42


and


44


and is coupled to battery


14


to provide an output to analog to digital converter


38


which is representative of the DC voltage across battery


14


. Further, an AC ripple detector amplifier


46


is coupled to battery


14


through capacitors


48


and


50


and provides an output to analog to digital converter


38


which is representative of the AC ripple voltage across battery


14


.




Microprocessor


30


controls analog to digital converter


38


to select which of the three inputs to digitize. Microprocessor


30


includes firmware, memory, and a software program in accordance with the invention. The user input


54


is coupled to microprocessor


30


to provide the information to microprocessor


30


from an operator.




Preferably, tester


10


is portable such that it may be easily moved between vehicles or otherwise transported. Portability of tester


10


is achieved because tester


10


does not require large internal carbon pile loads to load the battery charging system. Instead, as described herein, tester


10


utilizes loads internal to the vehicle


12


in testing the charging system. Further, the battery tester performed by tester


10


is in accordance with the non-load battery testing technique as described above.





FIGS. 2-8

are simplified block diagrams illustrating steps in accordance with the invention. User input for the steps can be through user input device


54


and a display can be provided through display device


32


. In

FIG. 2

, block diagram


100


begins at start block


102


. At block


104


the type of vehicle test is selected. If it is an in-vehicle test, control is passed to block


106


. If it is an out of vehicle test, control is passed to block


120


. At block


106


, the user is prompted to input the battery rating standard to be used for the test. Various standards include SAE, DIN, IEC, EN, JIS or a battery stock number. At block


108


, the user is prompted to input the battery rating according to the selected standard. A battery test is then performed at block


110


, the results of the battery test are displayed including battery voltage, battery cold cranking amps, and a general condition of the battery such as good, good but recharged, charged and retest, replace battery or bad cell-replace. Any type of battery test may be used, however, conductance, resistance, impedance or admittance based testing as described in the Champlin and Midtronics patents is preferred.





FIG. 3

is a simplified block diagram


118


for an in-vehicle test. When the user initiates a starter test, for example through an input through user input


54


, control is passed to block


124


and the operator is instructed to start the engine. Microprocessor


30


detects that the engine is being started by monitoring the resultant in drop in voltage across battery


14


. The starting voltage is measured at block


126


. Once the engine starts, and the voltage begins to rise, the tester


10


will display one of four different test results. At block


128


, if the starting voltage is low and the battery is discharged, the message “charge battery” is displayed at block


130


. At block


132


, if the starting voltage is low and the battery has a full charge, the message “cranking voltage low” is displayed at block


134


along with the measured voltage. If at block


136


, the starting voltage is normal and the battery has a full charge, block


138


displays cranking voltage normal along with the measured voltage. If, at block


140


, the battery test result was either replaced or bad cell, block


142


displays the message replace battery. The low and normal cranking voltages can be selected as desired and using known techniques.





FIG. 4

is a block diagram


150


which illustrates steps in a charging system test in accordance with another aspect of the invention. At block


152


, the procedure is initiated by the operator while the engine in vehicle


12


is running. At block


154


, the voltage across battery


14


due to alternator


16


is measured and displayed. The operator may press and enter button on user input


54


to continue operation and at block


156


the operator is instructed to turn off all vehicle loads and rev the engine for 5 seconds. At block


158


, the revving of the engine is detected by monitoring the AC ripple across battery


14


using ripple detection amplifier


46


. If, after 30 seconds, microprocessor


30


does not detect engine revving, control is returned to block


156


and the procedure is repeated. At block


160


, the engine revved voltage is measured and control is passed to block


162


where the operator is instructed to turn loads within the vehicle (i.e., headlights, fans, etc.) on and idle the engine. Again, an enter key on user input


54


is pressed and control is passed to block


164


and tester


10


measures the load on, engine idle voltage. At


166


, the user is instructed to rev the engine with the loads on and another voltage is obtained at block


168


. Control is then passed to block


170


in FIG.


5


and it is determined whether the engine speed has increased. At block


172


, if there is no charging voltage, that is i.e., the charging voltage is less than or the same as the idle voltage, an output is displayed. Similarly, if the charging voltage is low such that the total voltage across the battery is less than, for example, 13 volts, an output is displayed. At block


176


, if a high charging voltage is detected, such as more than 2.5 volts above the idle voltage, an output is displayed. When control reaches block


178


, an output is provided indicative of the diode ripple voltage. This voltage can be obtained during any of the measurements where the engine is revved. If the ripple voltage is greater than, for example, 130 mV, an indication is provided that there is a diode or a stator problem.





FIG. 6

is a block diagram of a diesel test algorithm


250


. If the tester


10


does not detect a charging or a ripple voltage, the tester begins the diesel test algorithm shown at


250


. This allows the glow plugs of a diesel engine to turn off. If, at any time during the procedure, a charging voltage and a ripple are detected, the normal test procedure will resume. At block


252


, the user is asked to input information as to whether the engine under test is a diesel engine. If the engine is not a diesel engine, a charging system problem is indicated. If the engine is diesel, control is passed to block


254


and a post heating delay, such as 40 seconds, passes at block


256


, if there is a post heating or glow plugs off condition, then a charging system problem is indicated. If there is a post heating or glow plug on condition, the operator is instructed to warm up the plugs and retest, or check the glow plugs.




Additionally, the tester


10


can receive a temperature input from the operator and adjust the battery test appropriately.




If the battery test indicates that the battery may have been charged before testing, the user is prompted to indicate whether the test is being performed before charging the battery or after charging the battery and the system is retested.




If the tester


10


determines that the battery may have surface charge, the operator is instructed to turn on the vehicle head lights as indicated in flow chart


300


at block


302


. If a drop in voltage is detected at block


304


indicating that the head lights have been turned on, control is passed to block


306


. If, however, the head lights have not been turned on, control is returned to block


302


. At block


306


, the system is retested. Flow chart


320


of

FIG. 8

shows a noise detection algorithm. If excessive ripple is detected during engine idle periods at block


322


, the operator is instructed to check system loads at block


324


. At block


326


, the system is retested.




Based upon the test, an output can be printed or otherwise provided to an operator indicating the results of the battery test, the battery rating, the actual measured battery capacity, the voltage, the voltage during cranking and whether the cranking voltage is normal, the condition of the charging system along with the idle voltage and the load voltage and the presence of excessive diode ripple.




In general, the present invention provides the integration of an alternator test with a battery test, an alternator test with a starter test, a starter test with an battery test, or an alternator test with a battery test and with a starter test. The invention allows information from any of these tests to be shared with the other test(s).




In one aspect, tester


10


measures the voltage across battery


20


. Both the AC and DC voltages are recorded. The AC voltage is used to identify alternator diode and stator faults. The DC voltage measurement is used to determine if the charging system is functioning properly. The electrical loads of the vehicle are used to load the alternator for convenience. However, other types of loads can also be applied. The tester continually monitors the charging voltage across the battery. The operator is instructed to turn on vehicle loads and rev the engine. The charging voltage is recorded with the engine revved. In a properly functioning charging system, this charging voltage should be greater than the measured battery voltage with the engine off. This indicates that current is flowing into the battery and thus the battery is being charged even with loads applied to the charging system. This testing principle does not require knowledge of the alternator size, or even the amount of current that the alternator is producing. In the testing, various DC voltages across the battery are measured including battery voltage with the engine off (stead state voltage), battery voltage with the engine running at idle (idle voltage), battery voltage with the engine revved, for example between 1,000 RPM and 2,500 RPM, and the vehicle loads off and battery voltage with the engine revved and vehicle loads on. The AC voltage across the battery which is measured with the engine running is used to detect excessive ripple which may be caused by a faulty diode or stator. Ripple of over about 130 mV is indicative of a diode or stator problem. Additionally, the ripple can be used by tester


10


to detect changes in engine RPM.




An initial revving of the engine can be used prior to returning to idle to ensure that the alternator field circuit is excited and conducting current. If the idle voltage with the loads off is less than or equal to the steady state voltage, then a charging problem exists. If the charging voltage exceeds the steady state voltage by more than, for example, 0.5 volts, then a regulator problem is indicated.




With the engine revved and the vehicle loads (such as head lights, blower, rear defrost, etc.) turned on, the revved and loaded voltage across the battery is recorded and compared to the steady state battery voltage. If the charging voltage with loads turned on while the engine is revved is not greater than the steady state voltage, then current is not flowing into the battery and the battery is not being charge. This indicates a problem and that the alternator cannot meet the needs of the vehicle while still charging the battery.




With the present invention, the battery test can be used to prevent incorrectly identifying the charging system as being faulty. Thus, the battery test ensures that a good battery is being charged during the charging system test. The measurement of the cranking voltage while the engine is being started is used to determine whether there is a starter problem. In diesel engine applications, the charging system voltage is measured to determine if the engine glow plug operation is effecting the charging system test result. A long cabling (i.e., 10 to 15 feet) can be used such that the tester


10


can be operated while sitting in the vehicle. The battery testing is preferably performed by measuring the conductance, impedance, resistance or admittance of the battery. Further, the battery test with the engine off can be compared with the battery test with the engine on and used to diagnosis the system.




Another aspect of the present invention relates to the generation of an “audit code” based upon the results of a test. As used herein, the term audit code refers to an encrypted code which contains information about a test performed on an electrical system of a vehicle. Such information can be particularly useful in monitoring the operation and usage of test equipment. For example, if the present invention is used to test automobiles and warranty claims are then submitted to a manufacturer based upon the results of a test, the present invention can output an audit code after the completion of the test. A manufacturer can decrypt the audit code and reject a warranty claim if the audit code indicates the claim has been falsified. The audit code can contain information, in an encrypted format, which relates to the tests which were performed on a particular vehicle. For example, a manufacturer, such as a vehicle manufacturer, can audit the test(s) performed on a vehicle to reduce the occurrence of warranty fraud. Warranty fraud can occur when an unscrupulous operator attempts to falsify test results in order to return a properly functioning component or to receive payment for services which were not actually performed on a vehicle. Warranty fraud can cost a manufacturer a great deal of money and also lead to misdirected research and development efforts in an attempt to correct defects which do not actually exist.




In such an embodiment, any of the tests performed by the present invention or measurements obtained by the invention can be included in the audit code. More generally, the audit code of the present invention can be formed using the results of any starter motor test, alternator test, battery test or a AC ripple test. In a general embodiment of this aspect of the present invention, the particular testing technique used to obtain the test results may be any appropriate technique and is not limited to be specific techniques set forth herein.





FIG. 9

is a simplified block diagram


350


showing steps in accordance with generation of an audit code of the present invention. The steps set forth in block diagram


350


are typically carried out by, for example, a microprocessor such as microprocessor


30


shown in FIG.


1


. However, the steps may be implemented in hardware, software or their combination as appropriate.




Block


352


illustrates the general step of outputting test results. The test results can be, for example, the results of a starter test, alternator test, battery test or diode ripple test. At block


354


, the microprocessor


30


retrieves the data which will be used in the audit code. As discussed herein, such data can comprise many different types of data including rating, operator or user identification, test data or results, etc. For example, this data can be retrieved from memory associated with the microprocessor. At block


356


, microprocessor


30


generates an audit code based upon the retrieved data in accordance with any of the embodiments set forth herein. The audit code is generated using an encryption algorithm. The particular algorithm used can be selected in accordance with the desired level of security. However, for most systems, a transposition offset cipher can be used in which individual data elements are transposed and offset by known amounts. More complex algorithms such as RSA, rotating codes or public key based encryption algorithms can be used if desired. At block


358


, the microprocessor


30


outputs the audit code, for example, on display


32


. An operator can then copy the audit code onto a return form, or enter the audit code into a database system of the manufacturer. If the audit code will be handled directly by an operator, the code and encryption algorithm should be such that the output is alphanumeric or in a form which is otherwise easy to copy onto a warranty submission form. Of course, if the code is electronically submitted, for example through a data link, the code can take any form. Such data links include, for example, modem or hard wired links, infrared links, ultrasonic links, bar code outputs, RF outputs, or other techniques for conveying data which are known in the art.




The particular data which is used to form the audit code can be any of the final test results or intermediary measurements (that is, measurements which are used to obtain a final test result) set forth herein. For example, the measured starter voltage during cranking, the starter test result, the measured alternator voltage or voltages, the alternator test result, or the ripple test result can be encoded. Battery condition, state of charge or time to charge information can be encoded. Further, the date of the test can be maintained by microprocessor


30


and can be included in the audit code. Using this information, the test can be audited to determine if the measured alternator voltage or starter voltage could actually result in the encoded test results. Further, by checking the encoded date, it is possible to determine whether the vehicle was even in a repair shop during the test period. The raw data, such as voltage levels or other intermediary measurements, can be used by a manufacturer to collect data regarding the operation of a product. For example, a manufacturer could note that a particular change to an alternator resulted in a statistically significant drop in alternator voltages as measured in actual vehicles. This could be used in a research and development effort to improve system operation.




Other information which can be encoded into the audit code includes information regarding the make or model of the vehicle or battery, information such as the VIN identifying the vehicle, temperature information, time of day information, an identification which specifies the operator, the identity of the dealer or shop performing the test, data which identifies the test equipment or the software used in the test equipment, system or component ratings or other information entered by an operator, the number or sequence of the test, or other information.




Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.



Claims
  • 1. An automotive vehicle electrical system tester, comprising:a starter motor voltage measurement circuit configured to measure a starter voltage of a starter motor of a vehicle; a display; a microprocessor configured to determine a starter motor condition as a function of the starter voltage and responsively output the starter motor condition on the display, the microprocessor further configured to encrypt information and responsively output an encrypted output which includes information related to the starter voltage.
  • 2. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 1 wherein the microprocessor is further configured to encrypt date information related to a date of a test and wherein the encrypted output includes date information.
  • 3. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 1 wherein the microprocessor is further configured to encrypt time information related to a time of a test and wherein the encrypted output includes time information.
  • 4. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 1 wherein the microprocessor is configured to measure a battery voltage of a battery of the electrical system and wherein the encrypted output includes information related to the battery voltage.
  • 5. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 1 wherein the encrypted output includes information related to the starter motor condition.
  • 6. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 1 wherein the microprocessor is further configured to measure an alternator voltage and wherein the encrypted output includes information related to the alternator voltage.
  • 7. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 1 wherein the microprocessor is further configured to measure an alternator ripple voltage and wherein the encrypted output includes information related to an alternator ripple voltage.
  • 8. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 1 wherein the microprocessor is further configured to perform an alternator test and wherein the encrypted output includes information related to a result of the alternator test.
  • 9. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 1 wherein the microprocessor is further configured to perform a battery test and wherein the encrypted output includes information related to a result of the batter test.
  • 10. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 1 wherein the microprocessor is further configured to encrypt a rating related to the automotive vehicle electrical system and wherein the output includes rating information.
  • 11. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 1 wherein the microprocessor maintains a number of sequence of a test and the encrypted output includes number of sequence information.
  • 12. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 1 wherein the microprocessor is further configured to encrypt information which identifies a vehicle under test and wherein the encrypted output includes vehicle identification information.
  • 13. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 12 wherein the vehicle information comprises a VIN for the vehicle.
  • 14. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 1 wherein the microprocessor is further configured to encrypt information related to an operator who performed the test.
  • 15. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 1 wherein the microprocessor is further configured to encrypt information related to a dealer who performed the test and the encrypted output includes encrypted information which identifies the dealer.
  • 16. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 1 wherein the microprocessor is further configured to obtain voltage measurements from the voltage measurement circuitry while an engine of the vehicle is running at different speeds and/or different loads are applied to the electrical system and responsively provide an alternator diagnostic output.
  • 17. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 16 wherein the encrypted output includes information related to the alternator diagnostic output.
  • 18. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 16 wherein the microprocessor further preforms a battery test and the starter motor condition is further a function of the battery test.
  • 19. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 1 wherein the starting motor condition comprises a cranking voltage low indication.
  • 20. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 1 wherein the starting motor condition comprises a cranking voltage normal indication.
  • 21. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 1 wherein the starting motor condition comprises a replace battery indication.
  • 22. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 1 wherein the microprocessor measures at least one of a battery voltage with an engine of the vehicle idling, a battery voltage with the engine revved, a battery voltage with the engine idling and a load applied to the battery, a battery voltage with this engine revved and a load applied to the battery and wherein the encrypted output includes at least one of the voltages responsively provides an output indicating a low charging voltage, no charging voltage, a normal charging voltage or a high charging voltage.
  • 23. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 1 wherein the microprocessor is further configured to encrypt temperature information and wherein the encrypted output includes temperature information.
  • 24. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 1 including a user input and wherein the microprocessor is further configured to encrypt the user input and the encrypted output includes user input information.
  • 25. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 1 including a Kelvin connection configured to couple to the electrical system of the vehicle.
  • 26. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 1 wherein the encrypted output comprises a visual display.
  • 27. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 1 wherein the encrypted output comprises a data transmission.
  • 28. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 27 wherein the data transmission comprises an infra red transmission.
  • 29. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 27 wherein the data transmission comprises an RF transmission.
  • 30. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 27 wherein the data transmission comprises a modem link.
  • 31. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 1 wherein the encrypted output comprises an alpha numeric code.
  • 32. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 1 wherein the encrypted output includes the alternator condition.
  • 33. The method of claim 1 including obtaining voltage measurements while an engine of the vehicle is running at different speeds and/or different loads are applied to the electrical system and responsively provide an alternator diagnostic output.
  • 34. An automotive vehicle electrical system tester, comprising:a alternator voltage measurement circuit configured to measure a voltage of a alternator of a vehicle; a display; a microprocessor configured to determine a alternator condition as a function of the alternator voltage and responsively output the alternator condition on the display, the microprocessor further configured to encrypt information provide an encrypted output which is related to the alternator voltage output alternator.
  • 35. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 34 wherein the microprocessor is configured to measure a battery voltage of a battery of the electrical system and wherein the encrypted output includes information related to the battery voltage.
  • 36. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 32 wherein the microprocessor is further configured to measure a starter voltage and wherein the encrypted output includes information related to the starter voltage.
  • 37. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 32 wherein the microprocessor is further configured to measure an alternator ripple voltage and wherein the encrypted output includes information related to the alternator ripple voltage.
  • 38. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 32 wherein the microprocessor is further configured to perform a battery test and wherein the encrypted output includes an information related to a result of the batter test.
  • 39. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 32 wherein the microprocessor is further configured to encrypt a rating related to the automotive vehicle electrical system and wherein the output includes rating information.
  • 40. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 32 wherein the microprocessor maintains a number of sequence of a test and the encrypted output includes number of sequence information.
  • 41. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 32 wherein the microprocessor is further configured to encrypt information which identifies a vehicle under test and wherein the encrypted output includes vehicle identification information.
  • 42. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 41 wherein the vehicle information comprises a VIN for the vehicle.
  • 43. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 1 wherein the microprocessor is further configured to encrypt information related to who performed the test.
  • 44. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 43 wherein the information related to who performed the test comprises information which identifies a dealer or shop.
  • 45. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 1 wherein the microprocessor is further configured to obtain voltage measurements from the voltage measurement circuitry while an engine of the vehicle is running at different speeds and/or different loads are applied to the electrical system and responsively provide the alternator condition output.
  • 46. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 32 wherein microprocessor is configured to encrypt the alternator condition output.
  • 47. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 32 wherein the microprocessor further preforms a battery test and the alternator condition is further a function of the battery test.
  • 48. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 32 wherein the microprocessor is configured to measure a starting voltage while the starting motor is actuated.
  • 49. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 32 wherein the microprocessor measures at least one of a battery voltage with an engine of the vehicle idling, a battery voltage with the engine revved, a battery voltage with the engine idling and a load applied to the battery, a battery voltage with this engine revved and a load applied to the battery and wherein the encrypted output includes at least one of the voltages responsively provides an output indicating a low charging voltage, no charging voltage, a normal charging voltage or a high charging voltage.
  • 50. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 32 wherein the microprocessor is further configured to encrypt temperature information and wherein the encrypted output includes temperature information.
  • 51. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 32 including a user input and wherein the microprocessor is further configured to encrypt the user input and the encrypted output includes user input information.
  • 52. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 32 including a Kelvin connection configured to couple to the electrical system of the vehicle.
  • 53. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 32 wherein the encrypted output comprises a visual display.
  • 54. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 32 wherein the encrypted output comprises a data transmission.
  • 55. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 54 wherein the data transmission comprises an infra red transmission.
  • 56. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 54 wherein the data transmission comprises an RF transmission.
  • 57. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 54 wherein the data transmission comprises a modem link.
  • 58. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 32 wherein the encrypted output comprises an alpha numeric code.
  • 59. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 34 wherein the microprocessor is further configured to encrypt date information related to a date of a test and wherein the encrypted output includes date information.
  • 60. The automotive vehicle tester of claim 34 wherein the microprocessor is further configured to encrypt time information related to a time of a test and wherein the encrypted output includes time information.
  • 61. A method of testing an automotive vehicle electrical system, comprising:measuring a starter motor voltage related to a voltage during operation of a starter motor of a vehicle; determining a starter motor condition as a function of the starter motor voltage; displaying the starter motor condition; encrypting data related to the starter motor voltage; and outputting the encrypted data.
  • 62. The method of claim 61 wherein the encrypted data includes encrypted date information.
  • 63. The method of claim 61 wherein the encrypted data includes encrypted time information.
  • 64. The method of claim 61 including measuring a battery voltage of a battery of the electrical system and wherein the encrypted data includes information related to battery voltage.
  • 65. The method of claim 61 including measuring a starter motor voltage and wherein the encrypted data includes information related to condition starter motor.
  • 66. The method of claim 61 including measuring an alternator voltage and wherein the encrypted data includes information related to alternator voltage.
  • 67. The method of claim 61 including measuring an alternator ripple voltage and wherein the encrypted data includes information related to alternator ripple voltage.
  • 68. The method of claim 61 including determining a result of an alternator test and wherein the encrypted data includes information related to the result of the alternator test.
  • 69. The method of claim 60 including performing a battery test and wherein the encrypted data includes information related to a result of the batter test.
  • 70. The method of claim 60 including encrypting a rating related to the automotive vehicle electrical system and wherein the encrypted data includes rating information.
  • 71. The method of claim 60 including maintaining a number of sequence of a test and the encrypted data includes number of sequence information.
  • 72. The method of claim 60 including receiving information which identifies a vehicle under test and wherein the encrypted data includes vehicle identification information.
  • 73. The method of claim 72 wherein the vehicle information comprises a VIN for the vehicle.
  • 74. The method of claim 60 including encrypting information related to who performed the test.
  • 75. The method of claim 74 wherein the information related to who performed the test comprises information which identifies a dealer or shop.
  • 76. The method of claim 60 including obtaining voltage measurements while an engine of the vehicle is running at different speeds and/or different loads are applied to the electrical system and responsively providing an alternator diagnostic output.
  • 77. The method of claim 76 including encrypting the alternator condition.
  • 78. The method of claim 60 including preforming a battery test and the alternator condition output is further a function of the battery test.
  • 79. The method of claim 60 including measuring a starting voltage while a starting motor is actuated.
  • 80. The method of claim 60 including measuring at least one of a battery voltage with an engine of the vehicle idling, a battery voltage with the engine revved, a battery voltage with the engine idling and a load applied to the battery, a battery voltage with this engine revved and a load applied to the battery and wherein the encrypted output includes at least one of the voltages responsively provides an output indicating a low charging voltage, no charging voltage, a normal charging voltage or a high charging voltage.
  • 81. The method of claim 60 including encrypting temperature information and wherein the encrypted data includes temperature information.
  • 82. The method of claim 60 including encrypting a user input and the encrypted data includes user input information.
  • 83. The method of claim 60 including providing a Kelvin connection to couple to the electrical system of the vehicle.
  • 84. The method of claim 60 wherein outputting encrypted data comprises providing a visual display.
  • 85. The method of claim 60 wherein outputting the encrypted data comprises providing a data transmission.
  • 86. The method of claim 85 wherein the data transmission comprises an infra red transmission.
  • 87. The method of claim 85 wherein the data transmission comprises an RF transmission.
  • 88. The method of claim 85 wherein the data transmission comprises a modem link.
  • 89. The method of claim 85 wherein the encrypted output comprises an alpha numeric code.
  • 90. The method of claim 61 wherein the encrypted data includes the starter motor condition.
  • 91. A method of testing an automotive vehicle electrical system, comprising:measuring an alternator voltage related to operation of an alternator of a vehicle; determining an alternator condition as a function of the alternator voltage; displaying the alternator condition; encrypting data related to the alternator voltage; and outputting the encrypted data.
  • 92. The method of claim 91 wherein the encrypted output includes time information.
  • 93. The method of claim 90 including measuring a battery voltage of a battery of the electrical system and wherein the encrypted includes battery voltage information.
  • 94. The method of claim 90 including measuring a starter voltage and wherein the encrypted data includes information related to the starter voltage.
  • 95. The method of claim 90 wherein the encrypted data includes the alternator condition.
  • 96. The method of claim 90 including measuring an alternator ripple voltage and wherein the encrypted data includes information related to alternator ripple voltage.
  • 97. The method of claim 90 including performing a battery test and wherein the encrypted data includes information related to a result of the batter test.
  • 98. The method of claim 90 including encrypting a rating related to the automotive vehicle electrical system and wherein the encrypted data includes rating information.
  • 99. The method of claim 90 including maintaining a number of sequence of a test and wherein the encrypted data includes number of sequence information.
  • 100. The method of claim 90 including encrypting information which identifies a vehicle under test and wherein the encrypted data includes vehicle identification information.
  • 101. The method of claim 100 wherein the vehicle information comprises a VIN for the vehicle.
  • 102. The method of claim 90 wherein the encrypted output includes information related to who performed the test.
  • 103. The method of claim 102 wherein the information related to who performed the test comprises information which identifies a dealer or shop.
  • 104. The method of claim 91 wherein the encrypted output includes date information.
  • 105. The method of claim 90 including performing a battery test and wherein the alternator condition is further a function of the battery test.
  • 106. The method of claim 90 including measuring a starting voltage while the starting motor is actuated.
  • 107. The method of claim 90 including measuring at least one of a battery voltage with an engine of the vehicle idling, a battery voltage with the engine revved, a battery voltage with the engine idling and a load applied to the battery, a battery voltage with this engine revved and a load applied to the battery and wherein the encrypted output includes at least one of the voltages responsively provides an output indicating a low charging voltage, no charging voltage, a normal charging voltage or a high charging voltage.
  • 108. The method of claim 90 including encrypting temperature information and wherein the encrypted data includes temperature information.
  • 109. The method of claim 90 including receiving a user input and encrypting the user input and wherein the encrypted data includes user input information.
  • 110. The method of claim 90 including providing Kelvin connections to couple to the electrical system of the vehicle.
  • 111. The method of claim 90 wherein outputting comprises providing a visual display.
  • 112. The method of claim 90 wherein outputting comprises providing a data transmission.
  • 113. The method of claim 112 wherein the data transmission comprises an infra red transmission.
  • 114. The method of claim 112 wherein the data transmission comprises an RF transmission.
  • 115. The method of claim 112 wherein the data transmission comprises a modem link.
  • 116. The method of claim 90 wherein the encrypted data comprises an alpha numeric code.
  • 117. The method of claim 90 wherein the encrypted data includes state of charge information related to a battery of the vehicle.
  • 118. The method of claim 90 wherein the encrypted information relates to a time to charge a battery of the vehicle.
Parent Case Info

This application is a C-I-P of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/293,020, filed Apr. 16, 1999, entitled “METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR AUDITING A BATTERY TEST” now U.S. Pat. No. 6,351,102 and a C-I-P of Ser. No. 09/426,302, filed Oct. 25, 1999, entitled “METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR AUDITING A BATTERY TEST” now U.S. Pat. No. 6,091,245, which is a Divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/681,730, filed Jul. 29, 1996, entitled “AUTOMOTIVE BATTERY CHARGING SYSTEM TESTER” now U.S. Pat. No. 6,051,976.

US Referenced Citations (225)
Number Name Date Kind
2514745 Dalzell Jul 1950 A
3356936 Smith Dec 1967 A
3562634 Latner Feb 1971 A
3593099 Scholl Jul 1971 A
3607673 Seyl Sep 1971 A
3676770 Sharaf et al. Jul 1972 A
3729989 Little May 1973 A
3753094 Furuishi et al. Aug 1973 A
3808522 Sharaf Apr 1974 A
3811089 Strezelewicz May 1974 A
3873911 Champlin Mar 1975 A
3876931 Godshalk Apr 1975 A
3886443 Miyakawa et al. May 1975 A
3889248 Ritter Jun 1975 A
3906329 Bader Sep 1975 A
3909708 Champlin Sep 1975 A
3936744 Perlmutter Feb 1976 A
3946299 Christianson et al. Mar 1976 A
3947757 Grube et al. Mar 1976 A
3969667 McWilliams Jul 1976 A
3979664 Harris Sep 1976 A
3984762 Dowgiallo, Jr. Oct 1976 A
3984768 Staples Oct 1976 A
3989544 Santo Nov 1976 A
4008619 Alcaide et al. Feb 1977 A
4024953 Nailor, III May 1977 A
4053824 Dupuis et al. Oct 1977 A
4070624 Taylor Jan 1978 A
4086531 Bernier Apr 1978 A
4112351 Back et al. Sep 1978 A
4114083 Benham et al. Sep 1978 A
4126874 Suzuki et al. Nov 1978 A
4178546 Hulls et al. Dec 1979 A
4193025 Frailing et al. Mar 1980 A
4207611 Gordon Jun 1980 A
4217645 Barry et al. Aug 1980 A
4315204 Sievers et al. Feb 1982 A
4316185 Watrous et al. Feb 1982 A
4322685 Frailing et al. Mar 1982 A
4363407 Barkler et al. Dec 1982 A
4369407 Korbell Jan 1983 A
4379989 Kurz et al. Apr 1983 A
4379990 Sievers et al. Apr 1983 A
4390828 Converse et al. Jun 1983 A
4392101 Saar et al. Jul 1983 A
4396880 Windebank Aug 1983 A
4408157 Beaubien Oct 1983 A
4412169 Dell'Orto Oct 1983 A
4423378 Marino et al. Dec 1983 A
4423379 Jacobs et al. Dec 1983 A
4424491 Bobbett et al. Jan 1984 A
4459548 Lentz et al. Jul 1984 A
4514694 Finger Apr 1985 A
4520353 McAuliffe May 1985 A
4633418 Bishop Dec 1986 A
4659977 Kissel et al. Apr 1987 A
4663580 Wortman May 1987 A
4667143 Cooper et al. May 1987 A
4667279 Maier May 1987 A
4678998 Muramatsu Jul 1987 A
4679000 Clark Jul 1987 A
4680528 Mikami et al. Jul 1987 A
4697134 Burkum et al. Sep 1987 A
4707795 Alber et al. Nov 1987 A
4709202 Koenck et al. Nov 1987 A
4710861 Kanner Dec 1987 A
4719428 Liebermann Jan 1988 A
4743855 Randin et al. May 1988 A
4745349 Palanisamy et al. May 1988 A
4816768 Champlin Mar 1989 A
4820966 Fridman Apr 1989 A
4825170 Champlin Apr 1989 A
4847547 Eng, Jr. Jul 1989 A
4849700 Morioka et al. Jul 1989 A
4876495 Palanisamy et al. Oct 1989 A
4881038 Champlin Nov 1989 A
4912416 Champlin Mar 1990 A
4913116 Katogi et al. Apr 1990 A
4929931 McCuen May 1990 A
4931738 MacIntyre et al. Jun 1990 A
4937528 Palanisamy Jun 1990 A
4947124 Hauser Aug 1990 A
4956597 Heavvvvey et al. Sep 1990 A
4968941 Rogers Nov 1990 A
4968942 Palanisamy Nov 1990 A
5004979 Marino et al. Apr 1991 A
5032825 Xuznicki Jul 1991 A
5047722 Wurst et al. Sep 1991 A
5087881 Peacock Feb 1992 A
5126675 Yang Jun 1992 A
5140269 Champlin Aug 1992 A
5144218 Bosscha Sep 1992 A
5144248 Alexandres et al. Sep 1992 A
5160881 Schramm et al. Nov 1992 A
5170124 Blair et al. Dec 1992 A
5179335 Nor Jan 1993 A
5204611 Nor et al. Apr 1993 A
5214370 Harm et al. May 1993 A
5214385 Gabriel et al. May 1993 A
5241275 Fang Aug 1993 A
5254952 Salley et al. Oct 1993 A
5266880 Newland Nov 1993 A
5281919 Palanisamy Jan 1994 A
5281920 Wurst Jan 1994 A
5295078 Stich et al. Mar 1994 A
5298797 Redl Mar 1994 A
5300874 Shimamoto et al. Apr 1994 A
5302902 Groehl Apr 1994 A
5315287 Sol May 1994 A
5321626 Palladino Jun 1994 A
5331268 Patino et al. Jul 1994 A
5336993 Thomas et al. Aug 1994 A
5338515 Dalla Betta et al. Aug 1994 A
5339018 Brokaw Aug 1994 A
5343380 Champlin Aug 1994 A
5347163 Yoshimura Sep 1994 A
5352968 Reni et al. Oct 1994 A
5365160 Leppo et al. Nov 1994 A
5365453 Startup et al. Nov 1994 A
5381096 Hirzel Jan 1995 A
5412323 Kato et al. May 1995 A
5426371 Salley et al. Jun 1995 A
5426416 Jefferies et al. Jun 1995 A
5432426 Yoshida Jul 1995 A
5434495 Toko Jul 1995 A
5435185 Eagan Jul 1995 A
5442274 Tamai Aug 1995 A
5445026 Eagan Aug 1995 A
5449996 Matsumoto et al. Sep 1995 A
5449997 Gilmore et al. Sep 1995 A
5451881 Finger Sep 1995 A
5457377 Jonsson Oct 1995 A
5469043 Cherng et al. Nov 1995 A
5485090 Stephens Jan 1996 A
5488300 Jamieson Jan 1996 A
5519383 De La Rosa May 1996 A
5528148 Rogers Jun 1996 A
5537967 Tashiro et al. Jul 1996 A
5546317 Andrieu Aug 1996 A
5548273 Nicol et al. Aug 1996 A
5550485 Falk Aug 1996 A
5561380 Sway-Tin et al. Oct 1996 A
5562501 Kinoshita et al. Oct 1996 A
5572136 Champlin Nov 1996 A
5574355 McShane et al. Nov 1996 A
5583416 Klang Dec 1996 A
5585728 Champlin Dec 1996 A
5589757 Klang Dec 1996 A
5592093 Klingbiel Jan 1997 A
5596260 Moravec et al. Jan 1997 A
5598098 Champlin Jan 1997 A
5602462 Stich et al. Feb 1997 A
5606242 Hull et al. Feb 1997 A
5621298 Harvey Apr 1997 A
5633985 Severson et al. May 1997 A
5642031 Brotto Jun 1997 A
5650937 Bounaga Jul 1997 A
5652501 McClure et al. Jul 1997 A
5656920 Cherng et al. Aug 1997 A
5675234 Greene Oct 1997 A
5677077 Faulk Oct 1997 A
5699050 Kanazawa Dec 1997 A
5701089 Perkins Dec 1997 A
5705929 Caravello et al. Jan 1998 A
5710503 Sideris et al. Jan 1998 A
5717336 Basell et al. Feb 1998 A
5717937 Fritz Feb 1998 A
5739667 Matsuda et al. Apr 1998 A
5747909 Syverson et al. May 1998 A
5757192 McShane et al. May 1998 A
5760587 Harvey Jun 1998 A
5773978 Becker Jun 1998 A
5789899 van Phuoc et al. Aug 1998 A
5793359 Ushikubo Aug 1998 A
5808469 Kopera Sep 1998 A
5821756 McShane et al. Oct 1998 A
5825174 Parker Oct 1998 A
5831435 Troy Nov 1998 A
5862515 Kobayashi et al. Jan 1999 A
5872443 Williamson Feb 1999 A
5895440 Procter et al. Apr 1999 A
5914605 Bertness Jun 1999 A
5929609 Joy et al. Jul 1999 A
5939855 Proctor et al. Aug 1999 A
5939861 Joko et al. Aug 1999 A
5945829 Bertness Aug 1999 A
5969625 Russo Oct 1999 A
6002238 Champlin Dec 1999 A
6008652 Theofanopulos et al. Dec 1999 A
6009369 Boisvert et al. Dec 1999 A
6031354 Wiley et al. Feb 2000 A
6037751 Klang Mar 2000 A
6037777 Champlin Mar 2000 A
6051976 Bertness Apr 2000 A
6072299 Kurie et al. Jun 2000 A
6072300 Tsuji Jun 2000 A
6081098 Bertness et al. Jun 2000 A
6091245 Bertness Jul 2000 A
6094033 Ding et al. Jul 2000 A
6104167 Bertness et al. Aug 2000 A
6114834 Parise Sep 2000 A
6137269 Champlin Oct 2000 A
6150793 Lesesky et al. Nov 2000 A
6163156 Bertness Dec 2000 A
6172483 Champlin Jan 2001 B1
6172505 Bertness Jan 2001 B1
6222369 Champlin Apr 2001 B1
6225808 Varghese et al. May 2001 B1
6249124 Bertness Jun 2001 B1
6250973 Lowery et al. Jun 2001 B1
6254438 Gaunt Jul 2001 B1
6259254 Klang Jul 2001 B1
6262563 Champlin Jul 2001 B1
6294896 Champlin Sep 2001 B1
6294897 Champlin Sep 2001 B1
6304087 Bertness Oct 2001 B1
6310481 Bertess Oct 2001 B2
6313607 Champlin Nov 2001 B1
6313608 Varghese et al. Nov 2001 B1
6316914 Bertness Nov 2001 B1
6323650 Bertness et al. Nov 2001 B1
6329793 Bertness et al. Dec 2001 B1
6331762 Bertness Dec 2001 B1
6332113 Bertness Dec 2001 B1
6351102 Troy Feb 2002 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (25)
Number Date Country
29 26 716 Jan 1981 DE
0 022 450 Jan 1981 EP
0 637 754 Feb 1995 EP
0 772 056 May 1997 EP
2 749 397 Dec 1997 FR
2 088 159 Jun 1982 GB
59-17892 Jan 1984 JP
59-17893 Jan 1984 JP
59-17894 Jan 1984 JP
59017894 Jan 1984 JP
59215674 Dec 1984 JP
60225078 Nov 1985 JP
62-180284 Aug 1987 JP
63027776 Feb 1988 JP
4-8636 Jan 1991 JP
03274479 Dec 1991 JP
03282276 Dec 1991 JP
04131779 May 1992 JP
04372536 Dec 1992 JP
5216550 Aug 1993 JP
7-128414 May 1995 JP
WO 9322666 Nov 1993 WO
WO 9405069 Mar 1994 WO
WO 9858270 Dec 1998 WO
WO 9923738 May 1999 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (16)
Entry
“Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy in Battery Development and Testing”, Batteries International, Apr. 1997, pp. 59 and 62-63.
“Battery Impedance”, by E. Willihnganz et al., Electrical Engineering, Sep. 1959, pp. 922-925.
“Determining The End of Battery Life”, by S. DeBardelaben, IEEE, 1986, pp. 365-368.
“A Look at the Impedance of a Cell”, by S. Debardelaben, IEEE, 1988, pp. 394-397.
“The Impedance of Electrical Storage Cells”, by N.A. Hampson et al., Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 1980, pp. 3-11.
“A Package for Impedance/Admittance Data Analysis”, by B. Boukamp, Solid State Ionics, 1986, pp. 136-140.
“Precision of Impedance Spectroscopy Estimates of Bulk, Reaction Rate, and Diffusion Parameters”, by J. Macdonald et al., J. Electroanal, Chem., 1991, pp. 1-11.
Internal Resistance: Harbinger of Capacity Loss in Starved Electrolyte Sealed Lead Acid Batteries, by Vaccaro, F. J. et al., AT&T Bell Laboratories, 1987 IEEE, Ch. 2477, pp. 128,131.
IEEE Recommended Practice For Maintenance, Testings, and Replacement of Large Lead Storage Batteries for Generating Stations and Substations, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., ANSI/IEEE Std. 450-1987, Mar. 9, 1987, pp. 7-15.
“Field and Laboratory Studies to Assess the State of Health of Valve-Regulated Lead Acid Batteries: Part I Conductance/Capacity Correlation Studies”, by D. Feder et al., IEEE, Aug. 1992, pp. 218-233.
“JIS Japanese Industrial Standard-Lead Acid Batteries for Automobiles”, Japanese Standards Association UDC, 621.355.2:629.113.006, Nov. 1995.
“Performance of Dry Cells”, by C. Hambuechen, Preprint of Am. Electrochem. Soc., Apr. 18-20, 1912, paper No. 19. pp. 1-5.
“A Bridge for Measuring Storage Battery Resistance”, by E. Willihncanz, The Electrochemical Society, preprint 79-20, Apr. 1941, pp. 253-258.
National Semiconductor Corporation, “High Q Notch Filter”, 3/69, Linear Brief 5, Mar. 1969.
Burr-Brown Corporation, “Design A 60 Hz Notch Filter with the UAF42”, Jan. 94, AB-071, 1994.
National Semiconductor Corporation, “LMF90-4th -Order Elliptic Notch Filter”, 12/94, RRD-B30M115, Dec. 1994.
Continuation in Parts (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/293020 Apr 1999 US
Child 09/575629 US
Parent 09/426302 Oct 1999 US
Child 09/293020 US