The present invention relates to an emergency egress window of an armored vehicle, and specifically an interior egress system for occupants to rapidly remove an armored window from the frame of an armored vehicle.
Insurgent attacks on U.S. troops supporting ongoing operations for the Global War On Terrorism (GWOT) in Iraq and Afghanistan have exposed vulnerabilities of the ground vehicles used by our troops. Consequently, the HMMWV (commonly known as HumVee) and other light tactical military vehicles, including the Light Utility Vehicle testbed by MillenWorks, are being up-armored to counter the insurgent threats and provide an increased level of soldier protection. A new issue results in that the additional weight of the armor and associated upward shift in center of gravity (CG) has caused these vehicles to become increasingly unstable and difficult for the troops to control. Numerous rollover accidents have and continue to occur given the tendency of these vehicles to go out of control and tip during evasive maneuvering, off-road travel and IED/RPG attack. When an up-armored vehicle rolls over, many times the crew cannot egress via the doors due to the weight of the armor on the doors, or jamming of doors from the vehicle frame twisting. The gunner's station is not an option for exit either if the vehicle is up-side-down. The result is that the crew is often killed due to vehicle fires, follow-up insurgent attacks, trauma injuries and drowning. Therefore there is a need for an emergency egress system for the up-armored vehicles.
A number of prior art examples exist with regards to emergency egress systems for vehicles. U.S. Pat. No. 3,739,527, issued Jun. 19, 1973, entitled KNOCKOUT WINDOW FOR VEHICLE, discloses a knockout window for a vehicle, such as a bus or mass transit car, U.S. Pat. No. 4,635,396, issued Jan. 13, 1987, entitled BUS WINDOW RELEASE MECHANISM, discloses a release mechanism for a vehicle, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,164,715, issued Dec. 26, 2000, entitled EMERGENCY EXIT WINDOW OF A VEHICLE WITH A WINDOW PANEL, discloses an emergency exit window of a vehicle. However, these prior art examples involve mechanisms that are incompatible with the transparent armor assembly required by military vehicles. The egress architecture must provide the crew the required level of blast protection while still meeting the unique interface and support structure requirements for the transparent armor assembly.
A standard (prior art) M1114 window armor assembly 8 is illustrated in prior art
There is therefore a need for an improved alternate or additional egress capability for up-armored vehicles to address the previously described problem, especially the capability for the vehicle occupants to effect the egress without exterior assistance.
The objective of this invention is to provide a manual means for the crew of the vehicle to easily remove the transparent armor assembly for the purpose of exiting the vehicle in emergency situations. Provision of the additional egress option provided by this invention increases the probability of survival for the crew members of up-armored vehicles. This invention provides an alternate means of egress while still maintaining and not compromising the required levels of protection for the crew from small arms fire and exterior blast. It is a goal of this invention to be simple for the vehicle crew to operate in an emergency situation and inexpensive to produce.
An embodiment of this invention is intended to be integrated into up-armored light tactical military vehicles to provide the crew an alternative means of emergency egress as an integral unit without the plurality of armor plates noted above. Such integration can be a retrofit or can be installed at the time of vehicle construction. The focus of this embodiment is the integration of a new function into the ballistic glass (transparent armor) component of these vehicles. As noted, it has been discovered that up-armor of light vehicles have increased the probability of rollover accidents due to changes in vehicle mobility characteristics (principally an elevated center of gravity) resulting from the additional weight of the armor. In the event of a rollover or other accident the crew will typically attempt to exit the vehicle via the doors. For some accident situations the doors may be blocked or jammed and therefore trap the crew inside the vehicle.
This invention provides an option for the crew to exit via the windshield (or other windows) in these situations. Conceptually, this invention provides a crew actuated mechanism that releases the transparent armor assembly from the frame structure of the vehicle. In the event of a rollover or other accident that may render the doors of the vehicle unusable, a crew member can actuate a simple, manually operated release mechanism from the interior of the vehicle. Upon actuation and release the crew member can manually push to remove and eject the windshield transparent armor assembly to the exterior of the vehicle. The resulting portal of the vehicle window frame structure provides the crew with an emergency egress option.
In another embodiment, the implementation of a rotary/slide locking mechanism is added to the transparent armor assembly. This mechanism integrates with the glass assembly frame. This mechanism provides a slide bar, sash lock, cam action or other variant approach to hold the transparent armor assembly to the vehicle window frame. In addition, the flange of the glass assembly frame supports the transparent armor assembly from the vehicle exterior via the interface with the vehicle window frame. The lock mechanism will provide support from the opposite side of the vehicle frame structure (interior to the vehicle) and secure the transparent armor assembly in place. An installation may require two or more lock mechanisms to be integrated with the frame. The lock mechanism can be released directly by the crew and requires no tools. Upon release the transparent armor assembly becomes unsecured and can be pushed out by the crew.
In another embodiment, the invention uses removable gasket material as the means to lock and disengage the transparent armor assembly. A fastener bracket is secured to the vehicle window frame structure (outer fastener bracket). This fastener bracket follows the perimeter of the frame opening and provides a lip to interface with one side of the gasket material. A modified glass assembly frame provides a second lip (inner fastener bracket) that is intended to interface with the opposing side of the gasket material. The flange of the glass assembly frame supports the transparent armor assembly from the exterior via the interface with the vehicle window frame. The gasket is fabricated from molded rubber or other similar compliant material. The gasket provides the mechanism to support from the opposite side of the vehicle frame structure (interior to the vehicle) and secure the transparent armor assembly in place. The gasket material is a two piece design. One portion of the gasket bridges the gap between the outer fastener bracket on the frame structure and the inner fastener bracket on the glass assembly frame. The second portion, referred to as the lock strip, locks the gasket in place and in turn secures the complete transparent armor assembly to the vehicle. With the lock strip installed the transparent armor assembly is secure and would require a tremendous level of force from the interior side to dislodge the assembly. The gasket lock can be released directly by the crew and requires no tools by removal of the lock strip. A handle may be attached to the lock strip and accessible to the crew for easy removal. Upon removal of the lock strip the transparent armor assembly becomes unsecured and can be pushed out by the crew with minimal force. This design has a benefit over other potential mechanical embodiments in that it is compliant and can reliably accommodate potential changes in vehicle window frame structure geometry that may occur as a result of a vehicle accident (i.e., rollover, IED).
In another embodiment, the implementation of a rotary locking mechanism will be added to the transparent armor assembly. This mechanism integrates with the glass assembly frame. The locking mechanism provides support from the opposite side of the vehicle frame structure (interior to the vehicle) and secure the transparent armor assembly in place. An installation may require two or more lock mechanisms to be integrated with the frame. The lock mechanism can be released directly by the crew and requires no tools. Upon release the transparent armor assembly becomes unsecured and can be pushed out by the crew. This design has a benefit over other potential mechanical embodiments in that it is compliant and can reliably accommodate potential changes in vehicle window frame structure geometry that may occur as a result of a vehicle accident (i.e., rollover, IED).
A feature to be integrated into any these above implementations is a lever arm for removal assist. This lever would interface with the vehicle window frame structure and the transparent armor assembly. This lever would be actuated by the crew following actuation of the primary release mechanism and provide a means to amplify force (pry bar) to assist removal of the transparent armor assembly. A second potential feature would be external removal ability. This feature would allow rescue personnel to remove the windows from the exterior of the vehicle to access crew.
The present invention is a vehicle emergency egress system, including a transparent armor assembly disposable in a vehicle window frame, the transparent armor assembly including at least one transparent armor pane, and interiorly accessible release means, the release means being selectively operable by a vehicle occupant for effecting release of at least the one of the transparent armor panes, such release permitting shifting a respective one of the at least one transparent armor panes from the transparent armor assembly to define an egress portal. The present invention is further a method of forming a vehicle emergency egress system.
The above summary of the various representative embodiments of the invention is not intended to describe each illustrated embodiment or every implementation of the invention. Rather, the embodiments are chosen and described so that others skilled in the art may appreciate and understand the principles and practices of the invention. The figures in the detailed description that follows more particularly exemplify these embodiments.
The invention may be more completely understood in consideration of the following detailed description of various embodiments of the invention in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Prior Art
Prior Art
In the following detailed description of the present invention, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will be obvious to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, and components have not been described in detail so as to not unnecessarily obscure aspects of the present invention.
In one embodiment, the present invention egress assembly 40 includes a transparent armor assembly 50 with a rotary locking mechanism 52. As illustrated in
On the interior face 70 of transparent armor assembly 50, a plurality of rotary lock mechanisms 52 are mounted. It is understood that a single rotary lock mechanism 52 might be employed within opposed removable locking bracket in all embodiments employing rotary lock mechanism 52. Such bracket (not shown) might be U-shaped with a leg engaging the respective interior and exterior faces of the structure supporting the transparent armor assembly 50. A further embodiment is a hinge with a readily removable hinge pin. Other embodiments are also possible. Each (or the single) rotary lock mechanism 52 includes a lock support 74 and a lock handle 76 operably connected by a through shaft 78. Lock support 74 is a bracket with mounting apertures 75 positioned at opposing sides. While lock handle 76 is disposed on an exterior side of lock support 74, a cam 82 disposed on shaft 78 is positioned on the inboard side of lock support 74. The through shaft 78 is rectangular in this embodiment but may have any shape that interacts with the cam 82. Cam 82 includes a cam aperture 84 for mounted connection with through shaft 78. The cam 82 extends distally to a frame engaging portion 86. The frame engaging portion 86 may include a semicircular dimple 87 or a rounded valley to provide less resistance during rotation of lock handle 76. Lock handle 76 includes a cylindrical shaft lug 88 that extends through support aperture 80. The through shaft 78 then extends distally from cylindrical shaft lug 88.
In operation, the standard window is retrofitted with a modified transparent armor pane 54 to which a plurality of rotary lock mechanisms 52 are operably coupled. To remove the transparent armor pane 54, the vehicle occupants rotate lock handle 76 a ¼ turn to release cam 82 from contact with the interior of window frame 10 to unlock all interiorly disposed lock mechanisms on a selected transparent armor pane 54. The transparent armor pane 54 may then be pushed outward disengaging it from window frame 10. The occupants may egress through the resulting aperture or egress portal.
With a bracket, the single rotary lock mechanism 52 is unlocked. The transparent armor pane 54 is then pushed outward and slid slightly sideward to disengage the bracket from the window frame 10 to define an egress portal. With a hinge, the single rotary lock mechanism 52 is unlocked and the hinge pin removed. The transparent armor pane 54 is then pushed outward to define an egress portal.
The rotary lock mechanism 52 may be substituted by a slide bar, sash lock or other variant mounted to the transparent armor pane 54. For example,
In one embodiment of the present invention of the egress assembly 100 as illustrated in
Outer fastener bracket 116 is disposed between vehicle window frame 108 and standard (prior art) window frame 10. The outer fastener bracket 116 includes proximal gasket barrier 118 at a first end and lower armored flange 120 at a second end connected by bracket connector 122. The bracket connector 122 extends generally parallel to the frame element 110. Proximal gasket barrier 118 and distal gasket barrier 114 form the gasket fastener gap 142.
Gasket fastener 104 bridges the gasket fastener gap 142 between proximal gasket barrier 118 and distal gasket barrier 114. Gasket fastener 104 is fabricated from molded rubber or a similar compliant material. Gasket fastener 104 includes gasket body 126 and gasket lock strip 128. Gasket body 126 includes an aperture or slot 130 disposed axially within gasket body 126 sized to accommodate gasket lock strip 128. Slot 130 is disposed on the interior (in the vehicle interior) portion of the egress assembly 100 when the egress assembly 100 is disposed in the window frame 10 and preferably extends around the full periphery of the transparent armor assembly 102. In this embodiment the gasket lock strip 128 has a triangular attachment face 134. A handle 132 may be attached to the gasket lock strip 128 for ease of removal.
In operation, disposing the gasket lock strip 128 in the slot 130 acts to expand the gasket fastener 104, thereby fixing the transparent armor assembly 102 in place. To disengage the transparent armor assembly 102, the occupant pulls handle 132 to remove gasket lock strip 128 from gasket body 126. This causes the gasket fastener 104 to relax its fixing grip on the transparent armor 106. The occupant can then apply force to transparent armor 106 so as to push it exterior to the vehicle, thereby creating an egress portal.
The vehicle emergency egress assembly of a further embodiment present invention is depicted generally at 130 in
This approach has some key benefits over other approaches, as noted above. The combination of the two sides, the top, the bottom and the center armor plates being replaced by a single monolithic plate provides additional structural integrity to the vehicle window frame. An identified high risk associated with the vehicle emergency egress (VEE) window is the potential for the thin walled window frame to collapse and bind the window after an accident. The structure provided by the armored configuration of the present invention provides an exoskeleton capability to preserve the integrity of the window openings in the event of an accident and help to mitigate this risk. In addition to the armored plate, vertical channel sections may be integrated with the armor to provide an even greater structural enhancement.
The replacement of the component armored plates of the prior art with a monolithic armored structure 140 simplifies the seating interface of the vehicle emergency egress assembly 130. The prior art implementation with component armored plates presents a number of issues due to the potential misalignment of the planes of these plates and the resulting challenges to provide a planar seating surface for the window. Replacing the component armor of the prior art with the single monolithic plate results in a single seating surface that provides an optimum planar surface to interface with armored windows 142.
The construction of the monolithic armor structure 140 provides the opportunity to reasonably control the tolerance of the opening that accepts the armored windows 142. This capability, in conjunction with the philosophy of referencing the windows to the armor rather than to the window frame of the vehicle, is a significant benefit for the design of sill 202 in order to ensure a reliable and consistent fit.
The construction of the monolithic armor structure 140 further eliminates the interfaces of the component armor plates of the prior art and the need for gap protection in the gaps at the interfaces of the component armor plate. This is a benefit for the protection of the occupant's vehicle as well as simplification of the design of the sill 202, as noted below.
The vehicle emergency egress assembly of this embodiment of the present invention is shown generally at 130 in the
The bow 148 is fixedly coupled to the sill 202. The bow 148 includes a base 160 that resides in part on the sill 202. A pair of opposed, spaced apart sides 162 are upwardly directed from the base 160. Each of the sides 162 includes a plate 164 fixedly coupled thereto on the inward directed face of the respective side 162.
A top 166 of the bow 148 extends between the sides 162 and is disposed in a generally parallel relationship with the base 160. A center bar 168 is centrally disposed along the base 160 and extends between the base 160 and the top 166. A plurality of bores 170 are defined in a forward directed faces of the sides 162, top 166, and center bar 168. The base 160, sides 162, top 166, and center bar 168 cooperatively define a pair of adjacent window apertures 171.
The monolithic armor structure 140 is integrally formed in a monolithic structure. The monolithic armor structure 140 includes a bottom plate 172. The bottom plate 172 is formed integral with a pair of side margins 176, a top margin 182, and a center plate bar 186 as a single unit. Each of the side margins 176 presents inward directed tabs 178. Further, each of the side margins 176 presents an outward directed tab 180. The top margin 182 extends between the respective side margins 176. The top margin 182 may include a notch 184 through which an accessory, such as a windshield wiper, may be directed. The integrally formed center plate bar 186 is centrally disposed with respect to the bottom plate 172 and the top margin 182 and extends between the bottom plate 172 and the top margin 182.
A preferably L-shaped sill bar 188 may be disposed overlying the sill 202 of the vehicle window frame 144. The sill bar 188 presents a plurality of forward directed bores 189.
The inner perimeter margin 175, defined in part by the bottom plate 172, the respective side margin 176, the top margin 182, and the center plate bar 186, defines a pair of respective adjacent transparent armor assembly (TAA) apertures 174.
The second component of the vehicle emergency egress assembly 130 is the armored window 142, as depicted in
A interiorly accessible release means 250 illustrated in
The sill integration of the present invention is depicted in
The sill 202 preferably includes two separate sills, flat sill 204 and raised sill 206. Highly compressible EPDM foam preferably provides the classic weather sill function. Other compliant materials may be used as well. This foam comprises the flat sill 204. The flat sill 204 is adhesively bonded to the inward directed flange 200 of the armored window 142. The flat sill 204 is extended around the entire perimeter of the inward directed flange 200. The flat sill 204 compresses against the structure of the monolithic armor structure 140 when installed on the vehicle.
The raised sill 206 is illustrated in
It may be advantageous to substitute a more dense sill material for the raised sill 206 along the bottom margin of the armored window 142 in order to better support the weight of the armored window 142. For this area, EPDM bar stock, as depicted in
In assembly, the monolithic armor structure 140 is mated to the vehicle window frame 144 by means of suitable fasteners disposed through the bores 187 that extend around the perimeter of the monolithic armor structure 140. The fasteners then engage the frame bores 170 defined in the vehicle frame 144. The positioning of the monolithic armor structure 140 with respect to the vehicle window frame 144 is determined by the abutment of the inward directed tabs 178 against the outward directed face of the plate 164. After the monolithic armor structure 140 is in place, the sill bar 188 may be affixed to the sill 202 of the vehicle window frame 144. Again such fixation is effected by fasteners passing through the forward directed bores 189 defined in the sill bar 188 and coupling with the bores 158 defined in the sill 202.
After the monolithic armor structure 140 is affixed to the vehicle, the two armored windows 142 may be inserted into the transparent armor assembly apertures 174 from the outside of the vehicle. Such insertion effects the sealing of the sill 202 with the monolithic armor structure 140, clamping rotation of the rotary lock mechanisms 252 into the locked disposition effecting compression of the flat sill 204.
While the invention is amenable to various modifications and alternative forms, specifics thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings. It should be understood, however, that the intention is not to limit the invention to the particular embodiments described. On the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives.
The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/872,386 filed Dec. 1, 2006, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/919,748 filed Mar. 23, 2007, which are incorporated herein in their entirety by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1632360 | Wilson | Jun 1927 | A |
2273971 | Love | Feb 1942 | A |
3397005 | May et al. | Aug 1968 | A |
3671370 | Littell, Jr. | Jun 1972 | A |
3739527 | Schubach | Jun 1973 | A |
3923339 | McDonald | Dec 1975 | A |
4005662 | Kohn et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
4167889 | Bohne et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
4316404 | Medlin | Feb 1982 | A |
4333282 | Medlin | Jun 1982 | A |
4336644 | Medlin | Jun 1982 | A |
4351558 | Mueller | Sep 1982 | A |
4352316 | Medlin | Oct 1982 | A |
4489639 | Winkler et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4495852 | Winkler et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
H000129 | Hansen | Sep 1986 | H |
4625659 | Saelzer | Dec 1986 | A |
4635396 | Ranz et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
5070764 | Shevach et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5169205 | James | Dec 1992 | A |
5438908 | Madden, Jr. | Aug 1995 | A |
5474352 | Davies | Dec 1995 | A |
5487323 | Madden, Jr. | Jan 1996 | A |
H001519 | Semple | Mar 1996 | H |
5533778 | Sheridan | Jul 1996 | A |
H001567 | Parsons et al. | Aug 1996 | H |
5594193 | Sheridan | Jan 1997 | A |
5663520 | Ladika et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5679918 | Korpi et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5738403 | Tyson | Apr 1998 | A |
5792974 | Daqis et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5811719 | Madden, Jr. | Sep 1998 | A |
5857730 | Korpi et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5939658 | Muller | Aug 1999 | A |
6164715 | Mosaner | Dec 2000 | A |
6302010 | Holler | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6327954 | Medlin | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6408733 | Perciballi | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6427383 | Brooks et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6719355 | Ornig et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6818268 | Gonzalez | Nov 2004 | B2 |
7029038 | Kobrehel | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7070242 | Mears et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7191694 | Gonzalez | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7225718 | Grove et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7232181 | Schmucker | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7254927 | Farrar et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7458306 | Singh et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7493844 | Martin | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7549366 | Park et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7695053 | Boczek et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
20020058450 | Yeshurun et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20030190439 | Gonzalez | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030221547 | Peretz | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040075283 | Kobrehel | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20060175866 | Dankert et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060288856 | Labock | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20100024633 | Piscitelli | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100071537 | Weber et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110260495 A1 | Oct 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60872386 | Dec 2006 | US | |
60919748 | Mar 2007 | US |