1. Field
The following inventions disclosure is generally concerned with vehicle event recorder systems and specifically concerned with vehicle event recorder systems having integrated web server modules.
2. Prior Art
The inventions presented in U.S. Pat. No. 6,947,817 by inventor Diem for nonintrusive diagnostic tools for testing oxygen sensor operation relates to a diagnostic system for testing a vehicle where such systems include a wireless communications link between a vehicle any remote network of server computers. In particular, a WiFi type access points allowed an analyzer to communicate by way the Internet with a server computer hosting and oxygen sensor SOAP (simple object access protocol) service. In a nutshell, the system relates to smog sensors for automobiles which communicate with remote servers by way of a WiFi communications links.
Video surveillance systems are used to provide video records of events, incidents, happenings, et cetera in locations of special interest. For example, retail banking offices are generally protected with video surveillance systems which provide video evidence in case of robbery. While video surveillance systems are generally used in fixed location scenarios, mobile video surveillance systems are also commonly used today.
In particular, video systems have been configured for use in conjunction with an automobile and especially for use with police cruiser type automobiles. As a police cruiser is frequently quite near the scene of an active crime, important image information may be captured by video cameras installed on the police cruiser. Specific activity of interest which may occur about an automobile is not always associated with crime and criminals. Sometimes events which occur in the environments immediately about an automobile are of interest for reasons having nothing to do with crime. In example, a simple traffic accident where two cars come together in a collision may be the subject of video evidence of value. Events and circumstances leading up to the collision accident may be preserved such that an accurate reconstruction can be created. This information is useful when trying come to a determination as to cause, fault and liability. As such, general use of video systems in conjunction with automobiles is quickly becoming an important tool useful for the protection of all. Some examples of the systems are illustrated below with reference to pertinent documents.
Inventor Schmidt presents in U.S. Pat. No. 5,570,127, a video recording system for a passenger vehicle, namely a school bus, which has two video cameras one for an inside bus view and one for a traffic view, a single recorder, and a system whereby the two cameras are multiplexed at appropriate times, to the recording device. A switching signal determines which of the two video cameras is in communication with the video recorder so as to view passengers on the passenger vehicle at certain times and passing traffic at other times.
Thomas Doyle of San Diego, Calif. and QUALCOMM Inc. also of San Diego, present an invention for a method and apparatus for detecting fault conditions in a vehicle data recording device to detect tampering or unauthorized access, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,586,130. The system includes vehicle sensors for monitoring one or more operational parameters of the vehicle. The fault detection technique contemplates storing a current time value at regular intervals during periods in which the recording device is provided with a source of main power. Inventor Doyle also teaches in the U.S. Pat. No. 5,815,071, a method and apparatus for monitoring parameters of vehicle electronic control units.
A “computerized vehicle log” is presented by Dan Kikinis of Saratoga Calif. in U.S. Pat. No. 5,815,093. The vehicle accident recording system employs a digital camera connected to a controller in nonvolatile memory, and an accident sensing interrupter. The oldest memory is overwritten by the newest images, until an accident is detected at which time the memory is blocked from further overwrites to protect the more vital images, which may include important information about the accident. Mr. Kikinis instructs that in preferred embodiments, the system has a communications port whereby stored images are downloaded after an accident to a digital device capable of displaying images. This feature is described in greater detail in the specification which indicates a wired download to a server having specialized image handling and processing software thereon.
Inventor Mr. Turner of Compton, Calif., no less, teaches an antitheft device for an automotive vehicle having both an audible alarm and visual monitor system. Video monitor operators are responsible for monitoring and handling an emergency situation and informing a 911 emergency station. This system is presented in U.S. Pat. No. 6,002,326.
A vehicle accident video recorder, in particular, a railroad vehicle accident video recorder, is taught by inventors Cox et al. In this system, a method and monitoring unit for recording the status of the railroad vehicle prior to a potential accident is presented. The monitoring unit continuously monitors the status of an emergency brake of the railroad vehicle and the status of a horn of the railroad vehicle. Video images are recorded and captured for a predetermined period of time after detecting that the emergency brake or horn blast has been applied as an event trigger. This invention is the subject of U.S. Pat. No. 6,088,635.
A vehicle crash data recorder is presented by inventor Ferguson of Bellaire, Ohio in U.S. Pat. No. 6,185,490. The apparatus is arranged with a three stage memory to record and retain information. And further it is equipped with a series and parallel connectors to provide instant on-scene access to accident data. It is important to note that Ferguson finds it important to include the possibility of on-site access to the data. Further, that Ferguson teaches use of a wired connection in the form of a serial or parallel hardwire connector. This teaching of Ferguson is common in many advanced systems configured as vehicle event recorders.
A traffic accident data recorder and traffic accident reproduction system and method is presented as U.S. Pat. No. 6,246,933. A plurality of sensors for registering vehicle operation parameters including at least one vehicle mounted digital video, audio camera is included for sensing storing and updating operational parameters. A rewritable, nonvolatile memory is provided for storing those processed operational parameters and video images and audio signals, which are provided by the microprocessor controller. Data is converted to a computer readable form and read by a computer such that an accident can be reconstructed via data collected.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,298,290 presented by Abe et al, teaches a memory apparatus for vehicle information data. A plurality of sensors including a CCD camera collision center of vehicle speed sensors, steering angle sensor, brake pressure sensor, acceleration sensor, are all coupled to a control unit. Further, the control unit passes information to a flash memory and a RAM memory subject to an encoder. The information collected is passed through a video output terminal. This illustrates another hardwire system and the importance placed by experts in the art on a computer hardware interface. This is partly due to the fact that video systems are typically data intensive and wired systems are necessary as they have bandwidth sufficient for transfers of large amounts of data.
Mazzilli of Bayside, N.Y. teaches in U.S. Pat. No. 6,333,759 a 360° automobile video camera system. A complex mechanical mount provides for a single camera to adjust its viewing angle giving a 360° range for video recording inside and outside of an automotive vehicle.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,389,339 granted to Inventor Just, of Alpharetta, Ga. teaches a vehicle operation monitoring system and method. Operation of a vehicle is monitored with an onboard video camera linked with a radio transceiver. A monitoring service includes a cellular telecommunications network to view a video data received from the transceiver to a home-base computer. These systems are aimed at parental monitoring of adolescent driving. The mobile modem is designed for transmitting live video information into the network as the vehicle travels.
Morgan, Hausman, Chilek, Hubenak, Kappler, Witz, and Wright with their heads together invented an advanced law enforcement and response technology in U.S. Pat. No. 6,411,874 granted Jun. 25, 2002. A central control system affords intuitive and easy control of numerous subsystems associated with a police car or other emergency vehicle. This highly integrated system provides advanced control apparatus which drives a plurality of detector systems including video and audio systems distributed about the vehicle. A primary feature included in this device includes an advanced user interface and display system, which permits high level driver interaction with the system.
Inventor Lambert teaches in U.S. Pat. No. 6,421,080 a “digital surveillance system with pre-event recording”. Pre-event recording is important in accident recording systems, because detection of the accident generally happens after the accident has occurred. A first memory is used for temporary storage. Images are stored in the temporary storage continuously until a trigger is activated which indicates an accident has occurred at which time images are transferred to a more permanent memory.
Systems taught by Gary Rayner in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,389,340; 6,405,112; 6,449,540; and 6,718,239, each directed to cameras for automobiles which capture video images, both of forward-looking and driver views, and store recorded images locally on a mass storage system. An operator, at the end of the vehicle service day, puts a wired connector into a device port and downloads information into a desktop computer system having specialized application software whereby the images and other information can be played-back and analyzed at a highly integrated user display interface.
It is not possible in the systems Rayner teaches for an administrative operator to manipulate or otherwise handle the data captured in the vehicle at an off-site location without human intervention. It is necessary for a download operator to transfer data captured from the recorder unit device to a disconnected computer system. While proprietary ‘DriveCam’ files can be e-mailed or otherwise transferred through the Internet, those files are in a format with a can only be digested by desktop software running at a remote computer. It is necessary to have the DriveCam desktop application on the remote computer. In order that the files be properly read. In this way, data captured by the vehicles is totally unavailable to some parties having an interest in the data. Namely those parties who do not have access to a computer appropriately arranged with the specific DriveCam application software. A second and major disadvantage is systems presented by Rayner includes necessity that a human operator service the equipment each day in a manual download action.
Remote reporting and manipulation of automobile systems is not entirely new. The following are very important teachings relating to some automobile systems having a wireless communications link component.
Inventors Fan et al, teach inventions of methods and systems for detecting vehicle collision using global positioning system GPS. The disclosure of Jun. 12, 2001 resulted in granted patent having U.S. Pat. No. 6,459,988. A GPS receiver is combined with wireless technology to automatically report accident and third parties remotely located. A system uses the GPS signals to determine when an acceleration value exceeds the preset threshold which is meant to be indicative of an accident having occurred.
Of particular interest include inventions presented by inventors Nagda et al., in the document numbered U.S. Pat. No. 6,862,524 entitled using location data to determine trafficking route information. In this system for determining and disseminating traffic information or route information, traffic condition information is collected from mobile units that provide their location or position information. Further route information may be utilized to determine whether a mobile unit is allowed or prohibited from traveling along a certain route.
A common assignee, @Road Inc., owns the preceding two patents in addition to the following: U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,529,159; 6,552,682; 6,594,576; 6,664,922; 6,795,017; 6,832,140; 6,867,733; 6,882,313; and 6,922,566. As such, @Road Inc., must be considered a major innovator in position technologies arts as they relate to mobile vehicles and remote server computers.
General Motors Corp. teaches in U.S. Pat. No. 6,728,612, an automated telematics test system and method. The invention provides a method and system testing a telematics system in a mobile vehicle a test command from a test center to a call center is based on a test script. The mobile vehicle is continuously in contact by way of cellular communication networks with a remotely located host computer.
Inventor Earl Diem and Delphi Technologies Inc., had granted to them on Sep. 20, 2005, U.S. Pat. No. 6,947,817. The nonintrusive diagnostic tool for sensing oxygen sensor operation include a scheme or an oxygen analyzer deployed in a mobile vehicle communicates by way of an access point to a remotely located server. A diagnostic heuristic is used to analyze the data and confirm proper operation of the sensor. Analysis may be performed by a mainframe computer quickly note from the actual oxygen sensor.
Similar patents including special relationships between mobile vehicles and remote host computers include those presented by various inventors in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,735,503; 6,739,078; 6,760,757; 6,810,362; 6,832,141; and 6,850,823.
Another special group of inventions owned by Reynolds and Reynolds Holding Inc., is taught first by Lightner et al, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,928,348 issued Aug. 9, 2005. In these inventions, Internet based emission tests are performed on vehicles having special wireless couplings to computer networks. Data may be further transferred to entities of particular interest including the EPA or California Air Resources Board, for example, or particular insurance companies and other organizations concerned with vehicle emissions and environment.
Other patents held by Reynolds and Reynolds Holding Inc., include those relating to reporting of automobile performance parameters to remote servers via wireless links. Specifically, an onboard data bus OBD system is coupled to a microprocessor, by way of a standard electrical connector. The microprocessor periodically receives data and transmits it into the wireless communications system. This information is more fully described in U.S. patent granted Oct. 21, 2003 numbered U.S. Pat. No. 6,636,790. Inventors Lightner et al, present method and apparatus for remotely characterizing the vehicle performance. Data at the onboard data by his periodically received by a microprocessor and passed into a local transmitter. The invention specifically calls out transmission of data on a predetermined time interval. Thus these inventions do not anticipate nor include processing and analysis steps which result in data being passed at time other than expiration of the predetermined time period.
Reynolds and Reynolds Holding Inc., further describes systems where motor vehicles are coupled by wireless communications links to remote host servers in U.S. Pat. No. 6,732,031.
While systems and inventions of the art are designed to achieve particular goals and objectives, some of those being no less than remarkable, these inventions have limitations which prevent their use in new ways now possible. Inventions of the art are not used and cannot be used to realize the advantages and objectives of the inventions taught here following.
The inventions disclosure of U.S. patent application filed Dec. 9, 2005 having Ser. No. 11/299,028 is presented by this same inventor. Further, another U.S. application filed Dec. 8, 2005 having Ser. No. 11/297,669 is similarly presented by same inventor. In addition, another U.S. application filed Dec. 7, 2005, entitled: “Memory Management in Event Recording Systems” serial number unknown; this application will be amended to properly reflect the serial number as soon as it is known, is also presented by instant inventor. Each of these disclosures include material which is critically important to a full understanding of important concepts relating to vehicle event recording systems. Accordingly, these disclosures are hereby incorporated here by explicit reference.
Comes now, James Plante with inventions of vehicle event recorders having integrated web servers.
Vehicle event recorders having integrated web server modules are first presented herein this disclosure. A vehicle event recorder is arranged as a video camera, microprocessor, memory among other supporting subsystems such that when a predetermined event occurs, in example a car crash or unexpected impact, a video record of the incident is preserved. In these inventions, such vehicle event recorders are further provided with an advanced interface system. A web server module is incorporated and arranged as part of the included computer system. Thus, the system and all its subsystems may be addressed via hypertext transfer protocol, http, type transactions and commands. Users can interact with vehicle event recorder units of these inventions with nothing other than any standard computer. It is no longer necessary to load, manage, and maintain, proprietary application specific software on a user's workstation computer. Rather, a user may manipulate system settings, view and transfer files, receive e-mail alerts, and otherwise completely control the device as its functionality is entirely exposed by the integrated web server and complementary computing systems.
As a consumer product, a vehicle event recorder may be installed in a family vehicle without special knowledge or skill. The device operates to collect video and other vehicle performance information while the vehicle is in normal operation. Upon connection to a computer network, or more specifically a home computer network, a simple computer workstation equipped with a web browser can address the vehicle event recorder as the web server is responsive to requests sent by the web browser.
In addition, these systems include pre-programmed ‘web pages’ or ‘web forms’. These pages may be implemented as computer files stored in a ROM or DRAM, et cetera, of the vehicle event recorder. They are pre-programmed with interconnects and preset relationships with subsystems. For example, these pages may be provide an interface to camera settings such as brightness and contrast, et cetera.
Further, in some versions, a file transfer protocol server and simple mail transfer protocol servers are also included. These servers also support general interface mechanisms which permit standard computers to interact with these vehicle event recorders without requiring installation of special software and hardware systems.
It is a primary object of these inventions to provide vehicle event recorders and vehicle event recorder systems.
It is an object of these inventions to provide vehicle event recorders with an improved user interface.
It is a further object to eliminate previously required workstation desktop applications and complex external communications mechanisms and protocol.
It is an object of these inventions to provide interface to vehicle event recording systems via standard computing platforms and ubiquitous software.
A better understanding can be had with reference to detailed description of preferred embodiments and with reference to appended drawings. Embodiments presented are particular ways to realize these inventions and are not inclusive of all ways possible. Therefore, there may exist embodiments that do not deviate from the spirit and scope of this disclosure as set forth by appended claims, but do not appear here as specific examples. It will be appreciated that a great plurality of alternative versions are possible.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with regard to the following description, appended claims and drawings where:
Throughout this disclosure, reference is made to some terms which may or may not be exactly defined in popular dictionaries as they are defined here. To provide a more precise disclosure, the following terms are presented with a view to clarity so that the true breadth and scope may be more readily appreciated. Although every attempt is made to be precise and thorough, it is a necessary condition that not all meanings associated with each term can be completely set forth. Accordingly, each term is intended to also include its common meaning which may be derived from general usage within the pertinent arts or by dictionary meaning. Where the presented definition is in conflict with a dictionary or arts definition, one must use the context of use and liberal discretion to arrive at an intended meaning. One will be well advised to error on the side of attaching broader meanings to terms used in order to fully appreciate the depth of the teaching and to understand all the intended variations.
Web Browser
A web browser is a computer graphical user interface operable for receiving computer files and presenting a graphical display which may have interactive elements sometimes called ‘controls’ or web controls. Further, a browser is operable for sending requests in the form of a computer file—generally both received and sent files are in a format such as XML or more familiarly HTML.
Web Server
A web server is implemented as a special module of a computer and is operable for exchanging information via computer files—generally files in XML/HTML formats. A web server receives requests and returns responses to external parties via a communications link.
Web Request
A web request is a data transmission arranged in agreement with Internet protocol directed to a specific web server.
Web Response
A web response is a data transmission by a web server arranged in agreement with Internet protocol and directed toward a requesting agent usually a web browser.
Physical Anomaly
Any change in a prescribed physical parameter which is defined as outside the scope of normal operating conditions.
Managed Loop Memory
A ‘managed loop memory’ is a memory system arranged to preserve in detail data captured during a period immediately past with respect to any instant but to overwrite that data with newer data when that data has sufficiently aged in accordance with a predefined expiration definition.
Vehicle Environments
The environment in and about a vehicle includes those spaces interior or exterior with respect to the car body. That is to say, traffic ahead of, behind, towards the sides of, and inside the driver compartment are all included as vehicle environments.
Communications Port
Includes means for supporting a data communications link including a transceiver or modem arrangement and suitable connection apparatus. Some examples include: a mobile cellular transceiver; WiFi; WiMax; bluetooth; Ethernet; serial port such as RS-232; among others.
In accordance with each of preferred embodiments of these inventions, vehicle event recorders having integrated Web servers are provided. It will be appreciated that each of embodiments described include apparatus and that the apparatus of one preferred embodiment may be different than an apparatus of an alternative embodiment.
Vehicle event recorders first presented here are generally characterized as including: a video camera, microprocessor, memory, and web server module. Video images are captured during use of the vehicle. When a particular ‘event’ occurs, a captured video series is saved to a durable memory. When the vehicle is returned to a location where network connectivity is available, the captured video series is made available for review via a web server. The integrated web server, when connected to a TCP/IP network, can receive requests for information from external web browsers. These requests for information may be directed as requests to view data captured during a recent previous operation period. The web server is suitably coupled to a memory whereby data and files stored there may be transferred to the requesting web browser. Accordingly, web servers of these systems expose data captured by the device, including video data of scenes about the vehicle captured during vehicle use. In addition, these web servers are also coupled to system settings and operational parameters whereby adjustments to those settings and parameters may be effected via a web browser. For example, trigger threshold values may be set to be more or less sensitive. An event trigger system arranged to detect an abrupt acceleration action may include an adjustable sensitivity level. Via web browser interface, the event trigger threshold can be set by a remote user operating a standard web browser in communication with the device web server. A web server is part of a complement pair which forms a user interface system. A web server and web browser connected together via a TCP/IP network form an interface system which is convenient and very powerful. Complete control of the device is permitted because prerecorded “web pages” or “web forms” may be prepared as part of the web server. These pages and the controls thereon may be coupled to physical systems of the device. In this way, the user having no other tools than a standard computer with a web browser is able to completely interface with the system. As such, proprietary software and the complexity and inconvenience associated therewith are completely eliminated.
With reference to
A vehicle event recorder with integrated web server is installed in the vehicle whereby a video camera has a clear view of the space and surroundings in front of the car. In this way, should the unfortunate occasion of a traffic accident occur, the video camera can provide a video record of traffic conditions and events leading up to the accident. A video series, including images captured just prior and just after an event moment as initiated by an event trigger, the series relating to an accident, is saved in a vehicle event recorder local memory. At a later time, when the vehicle is appropriately coupled to a workstation by suitable communications link, video series data can be transferred to the workstation where it may be further viewed and analyzed. A vehicle may be coupled to a workstation by communications link of several alternative forms including at least an Ethernet hardware connection, a WiFi wireless communications link, a Bluetooth communications link, a wireless mobile telephone network link, among others. Workstations used in these arrangements are of the type common to nearly every desktop in every home or office. While a workstation alone is insufficient for interacting with vehicle event recorders of these inventions, a workstation with a ‘web browser’ or ‘Internet browser’ such as the Windows™ Internet Explorer is an ideal combination for providing access to vehicle event recorders so arranged. Of course, competing web browsers such as FireFox, Opera, Konqueror, Safari, Gecko, et cetera may be used with nearly identical effect. In all cases, these browsers will communicate with a vehicle event recorder because they all can read, parse and produce appropriate XML and HTML transactions. Thus, it is not necessary for users of these systems to buy, subscribe to, install, learn to use, maintain, update, re-install, among others, any proprietary software. Rather, these vehicle event recorders expose their functionality to any computer running a web browser of a user's choice.
In all prior art versions of similar systems, workstations are coupled to vehicle event recorders by way of proprietary application-specific software running on the workstation. Thus, it is impossible in those systems to manipulate and control a vehicle event recorder with a general purpose computer not having specially prepared programming. Data exchanges between a workstation application of the prior art and those vehicle event recorders typically include proprietary calls and file and object formats not compatible with general-purpose applications. In contrast, as the unique vehicle event recorders first presented here include a built-in web server, users have access to inner workings and settings of the vehicle event recorder by way of ‘http’ transactions. Further, simple data transfer including large video files may be taken up and handled by the same web server or by an accompanying ftp (file transfer protocol) server.
In some preferred versions, data communications link 4 is a common home network. A vehicle parked in the household garage becomes coupled to the home network by way of its proximity to a WiFi router for example. When a teenage driver returns home, mom instantly has access to information including video of her children's driving activity by way of her internet browser.
A top-level block diagram of a video event recorder is presented as
In some preferred versions, cameras are arranged as forward looking cameras, others are rearward looking cameras, and still others as driver compartment view cameras. The number of cameras associated with a single vehicle recorder unit is meant to be not limited to one.
In preferred versions, a local memory is arranged to capture and preserve video information associated with a time prior to, and after, an important event. A managed loop memory includes an overwrite process which preserves data for a limited time and overwrites data as soon as it has aged in accordance with an overwrite scheme. Upon the occurrence of a ‘triggered event’—a car crash for example—the loop memory data is transferred to a buffer where it may be saved without subject to overwrite for an extended time.
An event trigger is arranged to detect a physical anomaly such as a high acceleration associated with a crash or other impact; alternatively a heavy swear or excessive braking maneuver; or even as a response to a panic button strike. The event trigger declares the occurrence of an incident and sets the memory to preserve all data associated with the incident or event.
A web server of these systems preferably includes preformed ‘web pages’ or sometimes ‘web forms’. In some advanced versions, these can be arranged in accordance with the Microsoft technology ASP.NET or sometimes referred to as Active Server Pages. These pages offer great latitude in providing web controls which are coupled to the internal systems of the vehicle event recorder systems. For example, the video camera may be controlled in that its contrast, brightness and intensity can be manipulated via such web controls on ASP.NET pages.
Because a car is easily coupled to a home computer network via a WiFi system, preferred versions include vehicle event recorder units having an output port fashioned as a WiFi or WiMax transceiver. Alternatives may include other radio type transceivers such as bluetooth, or optical type wireless links such as those which exploit infrared optical coupling. Of course, while not as convenient, it is entirely possible that a parked car be coupled to a home network via a hardwired Ethernet connection. A vehicle event recorder arranged with a common network interface card could be plugged in with hardwire (RJ45 type connector) to a local Ethernet system.
A web server is sometimes considered a part of the microprocessor or other computing platform, as it may be embodied as a computer code module running thereon. In
To better explain what is meant by the phrase: ‘the state of the vehicle event recorder’ presented above, one might consider the following text in conjunction with the drawing presented as
A group of controls associated with system function is presented in the diagram of
While sometimes these web servers are arranged with pre-programmed ‘web page’ objects addressable via web request actions, they may also include programmed modules known as web services. These functions, properties and events, do not have a user interface associated with them, however they include transaction interface which permits their being addressed via TCP/IP web requests. These functions, properties and events may be coupled to subsystems of the vehicle event recorder head. For example, an ‘authorized users list’ may be adjusted whereby log-on actions by users are enabled/disabled. This web service may be taken up automatically in response to some condition being met. Therefore, without user interaction via a web page, but rather by purely automated processes, i.e. web services, these vehicle event recorder systems may be adjusted and otherwise manipulated.
Best modes of these inventions are illustrated in
In special advanced versions, vehicle event recorders additionally include modules other than a simple web server. For example, an vehicle event recorder may additionally include a file exchange and e-mail server systems.
While most preferred versions are arranged with the primary objective being a home, family or small number user local systems, these inventions are also meant to include as a special case the need for remote operation. A private home computer network can be arranged with a public port which exposes certain services through a firewall to the public internet. In this way, a vacationing parent can still have a look at the vehicle use records from afar. Vehicle 91 equipped with vehicle event recorder 92 having integrated web server communicates with local radio 93 as it enters communications space 94. the mere act of the vehicle entering 95 the space causes the vehicle event recorder to become connected to the network which may include the Internet. Accordingly, a communications link 96 of many thousands of miles is possible whereby a user 97 working on any workstation 98 equipped with a browser can address the web, file and mail servers of the remotely located vehicle event recorder.
One will now fully appreciate how a vehicle event recorder having an integrated web server is used to provide simple user access to operation and function of these systems. Although the present inventions have been described in considerable detail with clear and concise language and with reference to certain preferred versions thereof including best modes anticipated by the inventors, other versions are possible. Therefore, the spirit and scope of the invention should not be limited by the description of the preferred versions contained therein, but rather by the claims appended hereto.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2943141 | Knight | Jun 1960 | A |
3634866 | Meyer | Jan 1972 | A |
3781824 | Caiati et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3812287 | Lemelson | May 1974 | A |
3885090 | Rosenbaum | May 1975 | A |
3992656 | Joy | Nov 1976 | A |
4054752 | Dennis, Jr. et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
4271358 | Schwarz | Jun 1981 | A |
4280151 | Tsunekawa et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4281354 | Conte | Jul 1981 | A |
4401976 | Stadelmayr | Aug 1983 | A |
4409670 | Herndon et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4420773 | Toyoda et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4425097 | Owens | Jan 1984 | A |
4456931 | Toyoda et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4489351 | D'Alayer de Costemore d'Arc | Dec 1984 | A |
4496995 | Colles et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4500868 | Tokitsu et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4533962 | Decker et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4558379 | Hutter et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4593313 | Nagasaki et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4621335 | Bluish et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4625210 | Sagl | Nov 1986 | A |
4630110 | Cotton et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4632348 | Keesling et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4638289 | Zottnik | Jan 1987 | A |
4646241 | Ratchford et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4651143 | Yamanaka | Mar 1987 | A |
4718685 | Kawabe et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4758888 | Lapidot | Jul 1988 | A |
4763745 | Eto et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4785474 | Bernstein et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4789904 | Peterson | Dec 1988 | A |
4794566 | Richards et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4804937 | Barbiaux et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4806931 | Nelson | Feb 1989 | A |
4814896 | Heitzman et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4837628 | Sasaki | Jun 1989 | A |
4839631 | Tsuji | Jun 1989 | A |
4843463 | Michetti | Jun 1989 | A |
4843578 | Wade | Jun 1989 | A |
4876597 | Roy et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4883349 | Mittelhauser | Nov 1989 | A |
4896855 | Furnish | Jan 1990 | A |
4930742 | Schofield et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4936533 | Adams et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4939652 | Steiner | Jul 1990 | A |
4942464 | Milatz | Jul 1990 | A |
4945244 | Castleman | Jul 1990 | A |
4949186 | Peterson | Aug 1990 | A |
4980913 | Skret | Dec 1990 | A |
4987541 | Levente et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4992943 | McCracken | Feb 1991 | A |
5012335 | Cohodar | Apr 1991 | A |
5027104 | Reid | Jun 1991 | A |
5050166 | Cantoni et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5056056 | Gustin | Oct 1991 | A |
5057820 | Markson et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5096287 | Kakinami et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5100095 | Haan et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5111289 | Lucas et al. | May 1992 | A |
5140434 | Van Blessinger et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5140436 | Blessinger | Aug 1992 | A |
5144661 | Shamosh et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5178448 | Adams et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5196938 | Blessinger | Mar 1993 | A |
5223844 | Mansell et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5262813 | Scharton | Nov 1993 | A |
5308247 | Dyrdek | May 1994 | A |
5309485 | Chao | May 1994 | A |
5311197 | Sorden et al. | May 1994 | A |
5321753 | Gritton | Jun 1994 | A |
5327288 | Wellington et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5330149 | Haan et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5343527 | Moore | Aug 1994 | A |
5353023 | Mitsugi | Oct 1994 | A |
5361326 | Aparicio, IV et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5387926 | Bellan | Feb 1995 | A |
5388045 | Kamiya et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5404330 | Lee et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5408330 | Squicciarini et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5422543 | Weinberg | Jun 1995 | A |
5430431 | Nelson | Jul 1995 | A |
5430432 | Camhi et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5435184 | Pineroli et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5445024 | Riley, Jr. et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5445027 | Zorner | Aug 1995 | A |
5446659 | Yamawaki | Aug 1995 | A |
5455625 | Englander | Oct 1995 | A |
5455716 | Suman et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5465079 | Bouchard et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5473729 | Bryant et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5477141 | Nather et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5495242 | Kick et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5495243 | McKenna | Feb 1996 | A |
5497419 | Hill | Mar 1996 | A |
5499182 | Ousborne | Mar 1996 | A |
5504482 | Schreder | Apr 1996 | A |
5515285 | Garrett, Sr. et al. | May 1996 | A |
5521633 | Nakajima et al. | May 1996 | A |
5523811 | Wada et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5526269 | Ishibashi et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5530420 | Tsuchiya et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5537156 | Katayama | Jul 1996 | A |
5539454 | Williams | Jul 1996 | A |
5541590 | Nishio | Jul 1996 | A |
5544060 | Fujii et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5546191 | Hibi et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5546305 | Kondo | Aug 1996 | A |
5548273 | Nicol et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5552990 | Ihara et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5559496 | Dubats | Sep 1996 | A |
5568211 | Bamford | Oct 1996 | A |
5570127 | Schmidt | Oct 1996 | A |
5574424 | Nguyen | Nov 1996 | A |
5574443 | Hsieh | Nov 1996 | A |
D376571 | Kokat | Dec 1996 | S |
5581464 | Woll et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5586130 | Doyle | Dec 1996 | A |
5590948 | Moreno | Jan 1997 | A |
5596382 | Bamford | Jan 1997 | A |
5600775 | King et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5610580 | Lai | Mar 1997 | A |
5612686 | Takano et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5631638 | Kaspar et al. | May 1997 | A |
5638273 | Coiner et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5642106 | Hancock et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5646856 | Kaesser | Jul 1997 | A |
5652706 | Morimoto et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
RE35590 | Bezos et al. | Aug 1997 | E |
5654892 | Fujii et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5659355 | Barron et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5666120 | Kline et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5667176 | Zamarripa et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5669698 | Veldman et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5671451 | Takahashi et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5677979 | Squicciarini et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5680117 | Arai et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5680123 | Lee | Oct 1997 | A |
5686889 | Hillis | Nov 1997 | A |
5689442 | Swanson et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5696705 | Zykan | Dec 1997 | A |
5706362 | Yabe | Jan 1998 | A |
5712679 | Coles | Jan 1998 | A |
5717456 | Rudt et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5719554 | Gagnon | Feb 1998 | A |
5781145 | Williams et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784021 | Oliva | Jul 1998 | A |
5784521 | Nakatani et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5790403 | Nakayama | Aug 1998 | A |
5790973 | Blaker et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5793420 | Schmidt | Aug 1998 | A |
5793985 | Natarajan et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5794165 | Minowa et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797134 | McMillan et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5798458 | Monroe | Aug 1998 | A |
5800040 | Santo | Sep 1998 | A |
5802545 | Coverdill | Sep 1998 | A |
5802727 | Blank et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815071 | Doyle | Sep 1998 | A |
5815093 | Kikinis | Sep 1998 | A |
5825284 | Dunwoody et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5825412 | Hobson et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5844505 | Van Ryzin | Dec 1998 | A |
5896167 | Omae et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5897606 | Miura et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5899956 | Chan | May 1999 | A |
5901806 | Takahashi | May 1999 | A |
5914748 | Parulski et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5926210 | Hackett et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5928291 | Jenkins et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5946404 | Bakshi et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5948038 | Daly | Sep 1999 | A |
5978017 | Tino | Nov 1999 | A |
6002326 | Turner | Dec 1999 | A |
6006148 | Strong | Dec 1999 | A |
6008723 | Yassan | Dec 1999 | A |
6008841 | Charlson | Dec 1999 | A |
6009370 | Minowa et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6011492 | Garesche | Jan 2000 | A |
6028528 | Lorenzetti et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6037860 | Zander et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6037977 | Peterson | Mar 2000 | A |
6049079 | Noordam et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6064792 | Fox et al. | May 2000 | A |
6084870 | Wooten et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6088635 | Cox et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6092193 | Loomis et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6100811 | Hsu et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111254 | Eden | Aug 2000 | A |
6118768 | Bhatia et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122738 | Millard | Sep 2000 | A |
6141611 | Mackey et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144296 | Ishida et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6151065 | Steed et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6163338 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167186 | Kawasaki et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6181373 | Coles | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185490 | Ferguson | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200139 | Clapper | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6211907 | Seaman et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218960 | Ishikawa et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6246933 | Bague | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252544 | Hoffberg | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253129 | Jenkins et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6298290 | Abe et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6333759 | Mazzilli | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6337622 | Sugano | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6353734 | Wright et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6389339 | Just | May 2002 | B1 |
6389340 | Rayner | May 2002 | B1 |
6405112 | Rayner | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6405132 | Breed | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6408232 | Cannon et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411874 | Morgan et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6421080 | Lambert | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6449540 | Rayner | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6472771 | Frese et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6518881 | Monroe | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6535804 | Chun | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6556905 | Mittelsteadt et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6559769 | Anthony et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6575902 | Burton | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6611740 | Lowrey et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6611755 | Coffee et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6624611 | Kirmuss | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6679702 | Rau | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6684137 | Takagi et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6714894 | Tobey et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6718239 | Rayner | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6728612 | Carver et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6732031 | Lightner et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6732032 | Banet et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6735503 | Ames | May 2004 | B2 |
6737954 | Chainer et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6739078 | Morley et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6760757 | Lundberg et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6795111 | Mazzilli | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6810362 | Adachi et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6812831 | Ikeda | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6819989 | Maeda et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6831556 | Boykin | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6832141 | Skeen et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6842762 | Raithel et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6850823 | Eun et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6859695 | Klausner | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6865457 | Mittelsteadt et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6873261 | Anthony et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6895248 | Akyol et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6898492 | de Leon et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6919823 | Lock | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6928348 | Lightner et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6947817 | Diem | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6950122 | Mirabile | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6954223 | Miyazawa et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6988034 | Marlatt et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7012632 | Freeman et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7023333 | Blanco et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7082382 | Rose et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7098812 | Hirota | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7100190 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7119832 | Blanco et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7155321 | Bromley | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7209833 | Isaji et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7265663 | Steele | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7317974 | Luskin et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7348895 | Lagassey | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7370261 | Winarski et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7382933 | Dorai et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7386376 | Basir et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7389178 | Raz et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7457693 | Olsen et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7561054 | Raz et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7702442 | Takenaka | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7725216 | Kim | May 2010 | B2 |
7768548 | Silvernail et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7821421 | Tamir et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7853376 | Peng | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7974748 | Goerick et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8113844 | Huang | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8140358 | Ling et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8314708 | Gunderson et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8538696 | Cassanova | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8635557 | Geise | Jan 2014 | B2 |
20010005804 | Rayner | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20020019689 | Harrison et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020035422 | Sasaki | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020044225 | Rakib | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020059453 | Eriksson et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020091473 | Gardner et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020111725 | Burge | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020118206 | Knittel | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020135679 | Scaman | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138587 | Koehler | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020163532 | Thomas et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169529 | Kim | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169530 | Laguer-Diaz et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183905 | Maeda et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030016753 | Kim et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028298 | Macky et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030065805 | Barnes | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030079041 | Parrella et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030080713 | Kirmuss | May 2003 | A1 |
20030080878 | Kirmuss | May 2003 | A1 |
20030081121 | Kirmuss | May 2003 | A1 |
20030081122 | Kirmuss | May 2003 | A1 |
20030081127 | Kirmuss | May 2003 | A1 |
20030081128 | Kirmuss | May 2003 | A1 |
20030081934 | Kirmuss | May 2003 | A1 |
20030081935 | Kirmuss | May 2003 | A1 |
20030095688 | Kirmuss | May 2003 | A1 |
20030125854 | Kawasaki et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030144775 | Klausner | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030154009 | Basir et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030158638 | Yakes et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030187704 | Hashiguchi et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030191568 | Breed | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030214585 | Bakewell et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220835 | Barnes | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040039503 | Doyle | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040044452 | Bauer et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054513 | Laird et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040083041 | Skeen et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088090 | Wee | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103008 | Wahlben et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103010 | Wahlben et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111189 | Miyazawa | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040138794 | Saito et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153244 | Kellum | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040153362 | Bauer et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040179600 | Wells et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040181326 | Adams et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040184548 | Kerbiriou et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040209594 | Naboulsi | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210353 | Rice | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040236474 | Chowdhary et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243308 | Irish et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040243668 | Harjanto | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254698 | Hubbard et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050021199 | Zimmerman et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050060070 | Kapolka et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060071 | Winner | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050073585 | Ettinger et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050088291 | Blanco et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050131585 | Luskin et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131595 | Luskin et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050136949 | Barnes | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137757 | Phelan et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137796 | Gumpinger | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050146458 | Carmichael et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050149238 | Stefani et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050159964 | Sonnenrein et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050166258 | Vasilevsky et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171692 | Hamblen et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182824 | Cotte | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050185936 | Lao et al. | Aug 2005 | A9 |
20050197748 | Holst et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050200714 | Marchese | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203683 | Olsen et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050212920 | Evans et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050258942 | Manasseh et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060007151 | Ram | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060011399 | Brockway et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015233 | Olsen et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060022842 | Zoladek et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060025897 | Shostak et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060040239 | Cummins et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060053038 | Warren et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060055521 | Blanco et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060057543 | Roald | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058950 | Kato et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060072792 | Toda et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060078853 | Lanktree | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060092043 | Lagassey | May 2006 | A1 |
20060095175 | deWaal et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060095199 | Lagassey | May 2006 | A1 |
20060095349 | Morgan et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060103127 | Lie et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106514 | Liebl et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060142913 | Coffee et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060161960 | Benoit | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168271 | Pabari et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060209090 | Kelly et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060209840 | Paatela et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060212195 | Veith et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060242680 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060253307 | Warren et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070001831 | Raz et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070005404 | Raz et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070027583 | Tamir et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070027726 | Warren et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070120948 | Fujioka et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124332 | Ballesty et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070132773 | Plante | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070135979 | Plante | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070135980 | Plante | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070136078 | Plante | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143499 | Chang | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150140 | Seymour | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070173994 | Kubo et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070183635 | Weidhaas | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208494 | Chapman et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070216521 | Guensler et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070219685 | Plante | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070219686 | Plante | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070241874 | Okpysh et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070257781 | Denson | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070257782 | Etcheson | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070257804 | Gunderson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070257815 | Gunderson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070260677 | DeMarco et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070268158 | Gunderson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271105 | Gunderson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070273480 | Burkman et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070279214 | Buehler | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070299612 | Kimura et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080147267 | Plante et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080157510 | Breed et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080167775 | Kuttenberger et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080169914 | Albertson et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080177436 | Fortson | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080252485 | Lagassey | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269978 | Shirole | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281485 | Plante | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080309762 | Howard et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090043971 | Kim | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090216775 | Ratliff et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090224869 | Baker et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100045451 | Periwal | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100063672 | Anderson | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100063850 | Daniel | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070175 | Soulchin et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100085193 | Boss et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100087984 | Joseph | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100157061 | Katsman et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100220892 | Kawakubo | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100250021 | Cook et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100268415 | Ishikawa | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110035139 | Konlditslotis et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110043624 | Haug | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110060496 | Nielsen et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110077028 | Wilkes et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110091079 | Yu-Song et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110093159 | Boling et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110121960 | Tsai | May 2011 | A1 |
20110125365 | Larschan et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110130916 | Mayer | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110173015 | Chapman et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110224891 | Iwuchukwu | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110283223 | Vaittinen et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110304446 | Basson et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120035788 | Trepagnier et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120046803 | Inou et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120071140 | Oesterling et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130006469 | Green et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130030660 | Fujimoto | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130332004 | Gompert et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140226010 | Molin | Aug 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2692415 | Aug 2011 | CA |
4416991 | Nov 1995 | DE |
0848270 | May 1998 | EP |
1355278 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1427165 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1818873 | Aug 2007 | EP |
2268608 | Jan 1994 | GB |
2447184 | Jun 2011 | GB |
58085110 | May 1983 | JP |
62091092 | Apr 1987 | JP |
62166135 | Jul 1987 | JP |
02056197 | Feb 1990 | JP |
04257189 | Sep 1992 | JP |
05137144 | Jun 1993 | JP |
5294188 | Nov 1993 | JP |
08124069 | May 1996 | JP |
09163357 | Jun 1997 | JP |
09272399 | Oct 1997 | JP |
10076880 | Mar 1998 | JP |
2002191017 | Jul 2002 | JP |
WO 8809023 | Nov 1988 | WO |
WO 9005076 | May 1990 | WO |
WO 9427844 | Dec 1994 | WO |
WO 9600957 | Jan 1996 | WO |
WO 9701246 | Jan 1997 | WO |
WO 9726750 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9937503 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO 9940545 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 9962741 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0007150 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0048033 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0077620 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0125054 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 2011055743 | May 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
1/0 Port Racing Supplies' website discloses using Traqmate's Data Acquisition with Video Overlay system in conjunction with professional driver coaching sessions (available at http://www.ioportracing.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=CTGY&Category—Code=coaching)., printed from site on Jan. 11, 2012. |
Adaptec published and sold Its VideoOh! DVD software USB 2.0 Edition in at least Jan. 24, 2003. |
“Ambulance Companies Use Video Technology to Improve Driving Behavior”, Ambulance Industry Journal, Spring 2003. |
“Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement, Trade Secret Misappropriation, Unfair Competition and Conversion” in DriveCam, Inc. v. SmartDrive Systems, Inc., Case No. 3:11-CV-00997-H-RBB, for the Southern District of California, Document 34, filed Oct. 20, 2011, pp. 1-15. |
DriveCam, Inc.'s Infringement Contentions Exhibit A, U.S. Patent 6,389,340, Document 34.1, Oct. 20, 2011. |
DriveCam, Inc.'s Infringement Contentions Exhibit B, U.S. Patent 7,804,426, Document 34.2, Oct. 20, 2011. |
DriveCam, Inc.'s Infringement Contentions Exhibit C, U.S. Patent 7,659,827, Document 34.3, Oct. 20, 2011. |
DriveCam, Inc.'s Infringement Contentions Exhibit D, Document 34.4, Oct. 20, 2011. |
“Answer to Amended Complaint; Counterclaims; and Demand for Jury Trial” in DriveCam, Inc. v. SmartDrive Systems, Inc., Case No. 3:11-CV-00997 H (RBB), for the Southern District of California, Document 47, filed Dec. 13, 2011, pp. 1-15. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/296,906, filed Dec. 8, 2005, File History. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/297,669, filed Dec. 8, 2005, File History. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/298,069, filed Dec. 9, 2005, File History. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/299,028, filed Dec. 9, 2005, File History. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/593,659, filed Nov. 7, 2006, File History. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/593,682, filed Nov. 7, 2006, File History. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,015, filed Nov. 9, 2006, File History. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/637,754, filed Dec. 13, 2006, File History. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/637,755, filed Dec. 13, 2006, File History. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,639, entitled “Driver Risk Assessment System and Method Employing Selectively Automatic Event Scoring”, filed Jan. 21, 2010, File History. |
Bill Siuru, “DriveCam Could Save You Big Bucks”, Land Line Magazine, May-Jun. 2000. |
Bill, “DriveCam—FAQ”, Dec. 12, 2003. |
Chris Woodyard, “Shuttles save with DriveCam”, Dec. 9, 2003. |
Dan Carr, Flash Video template: Video Presentation with Navigation, Jan. 16, 2006. |
David Cullen, “Getting a real eyeful”, Fleet Owner Magazine, Feb. 2002. |
David Maher, “DriveCam Brochure Folder”, Jun. 6, 2005. |
David Vogeleer et al., Macromedia Flash Professional 8UNLEASHED (Sams Oct. 12, 2005). |
Del Lisk, “DriveCam Training Handout Ver4”, Feb. 3, 2005. |
DriveCam Extrinsic Evidence with Patent LR 4.1.a Disclosures, Nov. 8, 2011. |
“DriveCam—Illuminator Data Sheet”, Oct. 2, 2004. |
“DriveCam Driving Feedback System”, Mar. 15, 2004. |
Drivecam, Inc., User's Manual for Drivecam Video Systems' Hindsight 20/20 Software Version 4.0 S002751-S002804 (2003). |
“DriveCam, Inc's Disclosure of Responsive Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence Pursuant to Patent L.R. 4.1.c & 4.1d” in DriveCam, Inc. v. SmartDrive Systems, Inc., Case No. 3:11-CV-00997-H-RBB, for the Southern District of California. Nov. 15, 2011. |
“DriveCam, Inc's Disclosure of Proposed Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence Pursuant to Patent L.R. 4.1.a & 4.1.b” in DriveCam, Inc. v. SmartDrive Systems, Inc., Case No. 3:11-CV-00997-H-RBB, for the Southern District of California. Nov. 8, 2011. |
Drivecam.com as retrieved by the Internet Wayback Machine as of Mar. 5, 2005. |
“DriveCam's Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Preliminary Infringement Contentions” in DriveCam, Inc. v. SmartDrive Systems, Inc., Case No. 3:11-CV-00997-H-RBB, for the Southern District of California. Aug. 19, 2011. |
“Driver Feedback System”, Jun. 12, 2001. |
“First Amended Answer to Amended Complaint and First Amended Counterclaims; and Demand for Jury Trial” in DriveCam, Inc. v. SmartDrive Systems, Inc., Case No. 3:11-CV-00997 H (RBB), for the Southern District of California, Document 53, filed Dec. 20, 2011, pp. 1-48. |
“First Amended Answer to Amended Complaint and First Amended Counterclaims; and Demand for Jury Trial” in DriveCam, Inc. v. SmartDrive Systems, Inc., Case No. 3:11-CV-00997 H (RBB), for the Southern District of California, Exhibit A, Document 55, filed Jan. 3, 2012, pp. 49-103. |
Franke, U., et al., Autonomous Driving Goes Downtown, IEEE Intelligent Systems, 13(6):40-48 (1988); Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/5254.736001. |
Gallagher, B., et al., Wireless Communications for Vehicle Safety: Radio Link Performance and Wireless Connectivity Methods, Vehicular Technology Magazine, IEEE, 1(4):4-24 (2006); Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/MVT.2006.343641. |
Gandhi, T., et al., Pedestrian Protection Systems: Issues, Survey, and Challenges, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 8(3):413-430 (2007); Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TITS.2007.903444. |
Gary and Sophia Rayner, Final Report for Innovations Deserving Exploratory Analysis (IDEA) Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Programs' Project 84, I-Witness Black Box Recorder, San Diego, CA, Nov. 2001. |
GE published its VCR Users Guide for Model VG4255 in 1995. |
Glenn Oster, “HindSight 20/20 v4.0 Software Installation”, 1 of 2, Jun. 20, 2003. |
Glenn Oster, “HindSight 20/20 v4.0 Software Installation”, 2 of 2, Jun. 20, 2003. |
Glenn Oster, “Illuminator Installation”, Oct. 3, 2004. |
Hans Fantel, Video; Search Methods Make a Difference In Picking VCR's, NY Times, Aug. 13, 1989. |
“HindSight v4.0 Users Guide”, DriveCam Video Systems, Apr. 25, 2005. |
“Interior Camera Data Sheet”, Oct. 26, 2001. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US07/68329 on Mar. 3, 2008. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US07/68332 on Mar. 3, 2008. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US07/68334 on Mar. 5, 2008. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US07/68328 on Oct. 15, 2007. |
International Seach Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US0/68325 on Feb. 27, 2008. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US07/68333 on Mar. 5, 2008. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees with Communication of Partial International Search issued in PCT/US2010/0222012 on Jul. 21, 2010. |
J. Gallagher, “Lancer Recommends Tech Tool”, Insurance and Technology Magazine, Feb. 2002. |
Jean (DriveCam vendor), “DC Data Sheet”, Nov. 6, 2002. |
Jean (DriveCam vendor), “DriveCam brochure”, Nov. 6, 2002. |
Jean (DriveCam vendor), “Feedback Data Sheet”, Nov. 6, 2002. |
Jean (DriveCam vendor), “HindSight 20-20 Data Sheet”, Nov. 4, 2002. |
Jessyca Wallace, “Analyzing and Processing DriveCam Recorded Events”, Oct. 6, 2003. |
Jessyca Wallace, “Overview of the DriveCam Program”, Dec. 15, 2005. |
Jessyca Wallace, “The DriveCam Driver Feedback System”, Apr. 6, 2004. |
Joint Claim Construction Chart, U.S. Patent No. 6,389,340, “Vehicle Data Recorder” for Case No. 3:11-CV-00997-H-RBB, Document 43-1, filed Dec. 1, 2011, pp. 1-33. |
“Joint Claim Construction Worksheet” in DriveCam, Inc. v. SmartDrive Systems, Inc., Case No. 3:11-CV-00997 H (RBB), for the Southern District of California, Document 44, filed Dec. 1, 2011, pp. 1-2. |
Joint Claim Construction Worksheet, U.S. Patent No. 6,389,340, “Vehicle Data Reporter” for Case No. 3:11-CV-00997-H-RBB, Document 44-1, filed Dec. 1, 2011, pp. 1-10. |
“Joint Claim Construction Chart” in DriveCam, Inc. v. SmartDrive Systems, Inc., Case No. 11-CV-0997-H (RBB), for the Southern District of California, Document 43, filed Dec. 1, 2011, pp. 1-2. |
“Joint Motion for Leave to Supplement Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Preliminary Infringement Contentions” in DriveCam, Inc. v. SmartDrive Systems, Inc., Case No. 3:11-cv-00997-H-RBB, Document 29, filed Oct. 12, 2011, pp. 1-7. |
Julie Stevens, “DriveCam Services”, Nov. 15, 2004. |
Julie Stevens, “Program Support Roll-Out & Monitoring”, Jul. 13, 2004. |
Jung, Sang-Hack, et al., Egomotion Estimation in Monocular Infra-red Image Sequence for Night Vision Applications, IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV '07), Feb. 2007, pp. 8-8; Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/WACV.2007.20. |
JVC Company of America, JVC Video Cassette Recorder HR-IP820U Instructions (1996). |
Kamijo, S., et al., A Real-Time Traffic Monitoring System by Stochastic Model Combination, IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 4:3275-3281 (2003). |
Kamijo, S., et al., An Incident Detection System Based on Semantic Hierarchy, Proceedings of the 7th International IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference, Oct. 3-6, 2004, pp. 853-858; Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/ITSC.2004.1399015. |
Karen, “Downloading Options to HindSight 20/20”, Aug. 6, 2002. |
Karen, “Managers Guide to the DriveCam Driving Feedback System”, Jul. 30, 2002. |
Kathy Latus (Latus Design), “Case Study—Cloud 9 Shuttle”, Sep. 23, 2005. |
Kathy Latus (Latus Design), “Case Study—Lloyd Pest Control”, Jul. 19, 2005. |
Kathy Latus (Latus Design), “Case Study—Time Warner Cable”, Sep. 23, 2005. |
Ki, Yong-Kul, et al., A Traffic Accident Detection Model using Metadata Registry, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications; Aug. 9-11, 2006 pp. 255- 259 Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/SERA.2006.8. |
Lin, Chin-Teng et al., EEG-based drowsiness estimation for safety driving using independent component analysis; IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems-I: Regular Papers, 52(12):2726-2738 (2005); Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TCSI.2005.857555. |
Lisa McKenna, “A Fly on the Windshield?”, Pest Control Technology Magazine, Apr. 2003. |
Miller, D.P., Evaluation of Vision Systems for Teleoperated Land Vehicles. Control Systems Magazine, IEEE, 8(3):37-41 (1988); Digital Identifier 10.1109/37.475. |
Munder, S., et al., Pedestrian Detection and Tracking Using a Mixture of View-Based Shape-Texture Models, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 9(2):333-343 (2008); Digital Identifier 10.1109/TITS.2008.922943. |
Panasonic Corporation, Video Cassette Recorder (VCR) Operating Instructions for Models No. PV-V4020/PV-V4520 (1988). |
“Passenger Transportation Mode Brochure”, May 2, 2005. |
“Preliminary Claim Construction and Identification of Extrinsic Evidence of Defendant Counterclaimant SmartDriveSystems, Inc.” in DriveCam, Inc. v. SmartDrive Systems, Inc., Case No. 3:11-CV-00997-H (RBB), for the Southern District of California. Nov. 8, 2011. |
Quinn Maughan, “DriveCam Enterprise Services”, Jan. 5, 2006. |
Quinn Maughan, “DriveCam Managed Services”, Jan. 5, 2006. |
Quinn Maughan, “DriveCam Standard Edition”, Jan. 5, 2006. |
Quinn Maughan, “DriveCam Unit Installation”, Jul. 21, 2005. |
Quinn Maughan, “Enterprise Services”, April17, 2006. |
Quinn Maughan, “HindSight Installation Guide”, Sep. 29, 2005. |
Quinn Maughan, “HindSight Users Guide”, Jun. 20, 2005. |
“Responsive Claim Construction and Identification of Extrinsic Evidence of Defendant/Counterclaimant SmartDrive Systems, Inc.” in DriveCam, Inc. v. SmartDrive Systems, Inc., Case No. 3:11-CV-00997-H (RBB), for the Southern District of California. Nov. 15, 2011. |
Ronnie Rittenberry, “Eyes on the Road”, Jul. 2004. |
SmartDrives Systems, Inc.'s Production, SO14246-S014255, Nov. 16, 2011. |
“Supplement to DriveCam's Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Preliminary Infringement Contentions” in DriveCam, Inc. v. SmartDrive Systems, Inc., Case No. 3:11-CV-00997-H-RBB, for the Southern District of California. Oct. 14, 2011. |
“The DriveCam”, Nov. 6, 2002. |
Transportation Systems (ITS) Programs' Project 84, 1-Witness Black Box Recorder, San Diego, CA. Nov. 2001. |
Traqmate GPS Data Acquisition's Traqmate Data Acquisition with Video Overlay system was used to create a video of a driving event on Oct. 2, 2005 (available at http://www.trackvision.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=51&sid=1184fbbcbe3be5c87ffa0f2ee6e2da76), printed from site on Jan. 11, 2012. |
Veeraraghavan, H., et al., Computer Vision Algorithms for Intersection Monitoring, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 4(2):78- 89 (2003); Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TITS.2003.821212. |
Wijesoma, W.S., et al., Road Curb Tracking in an Urban Environment, Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of Information Fusion, 1:261-268 (2003). |
World News Tonight, CBS Television New Program discussing teen drivers using the DriveCam Program and DriveCam Technology, Oct. 10, 2005, On PC formatted CD-R, World News Tonight.wmv, 7.02 MB, Created Jan. 12, 2011. |
World News Tonight, PBS Television New Program discussing teen drivers using the DriveCam Program and DriveCam Technology, Oct. 10, 2005, On PC formatted CD-R, Teens Behind the Wheel.wmv, 236MB, Created Jan. 12, 2011. |
International Search Report issued in PCT/US2006/47042 mailed Feb. 25, 2008. |
Inovate Motorsports, OT-1 16 Channel OBD-II Interface User Manual, Version 1.0, Nov. 28, 2007, pp. 3, 4, 21 & 27. |
Trivinci Systems, LLC, Race-Keeper Systems User Guide, Jan. 2011, v1, 1.02, pp. 34 and 39. |
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/036,299, mailed Aug. 12, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070219685 A1 | Sep 2007 | US |