Vehicle event recorders with integrated web server

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9402060
  • Patent Number
    9,402,060
  • Date Filed
    Friday, February 27, 2015
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 26, 2016
    8 years ago
Abstract
Vehicle event recorders are arranged with integrated web servers to provide a simple user interface and control mechanism which may be address with commonly available hardware and software. A vehicle event recorder of these inventions couples to a network having a workstation node. The workstation having either of the many available web browsers can be used to view, address, control, perform data transfer, et cetera, by way of data exchange in accordance with simple IP protocols. A vehicle equipped with these systems returns to a household to make a network connection. A local server is used to see all exposed system controls as provided by predefined web pages provided by a web server integrated as part of the vehicle event recorder unit.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTIONS

1. Field


The following inventions disclosure is generally concerned with vehicle event recorder systems and specifically concerned with vehicle event recorder systems having integrated web server modules.


2. Prior Art


The inventions presented in U.S. Pat. No. 6,947,817 by inventor Diem for nonintrusive diagnostic tools for testing oxygen sensor operation relates to a diagnostic system for testing a vehicle where such systems include a wireless communications link between a vehicle any remote network of server computers. In particular, a WiFi type access points allowed an analyzer to communicate by way the Internet with a server computer hosting and oxygen sensor SOAP (simple object access protocol) service. In a nutshell, the system relates to smog sensors for automobiles which communicate with remote servers by way of a WiFi communications links.


Video surveillance systems are used to provide video records of events, incidents, happenings, et cetera in locations of special interest. For example, retail banking offices are generally protected with video surveillance systems which provide video evidence in case of robbery. While video surveillance systems are generally used in fixed location scenarios, mobile video surveillance systems are also commonly used today.


In particular, video systems have been configured for use in conjunction with an automobile and especially for use with police cruiser type automobiles. As a police cruiser is frequently quite near the scene of an active crime, important image information may be captured by video cameras installed on the police cruiser. Specific activity of interest which may occur about an automobile is not always associated with crime and criminals. Sometimes events which occur in the environments immediately about an automobile are of interest for reasons having nothing to do with crime. In example, a simple traffic accident where two cars come together in a collision may be the subject of video evidence of value. Events and circumstances leading up to the collision accident may be preserved such that an accurate reconstruction can be created. This information is useful when trying come to a determination as to cause, fault and liability. As such, general use of video systems in conjunction with automobiles is quickly becoming an important tool useful for the protection of all. Some examples of the systems are illustrated below with reference to pertinent documents.


Inventor Schmidt presents in U.S. Pat. No. 5,570,127, a video recording system for a passenger vehicle, namely a school bus, which has two video cameras one for an inside bus view and one for a traffic view, a single recorder, and a system whereby the two cameras are multiplexed at appropriate times, to the recording device. A switching signal determines which of the two video cameras is in communication with the video recorder so as to view passengers on the passenger vehicle at certain times and passing traffic at other times.


Thomas Doyle of San Diego, Calif. and QUALCOMM Inc. also of San Diego, present an invention for a method and apparatus for detecting fault conditions in a vehicle data recording device to detect tampering or unauthorized access, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,586,130. The system includes vehicle sensors for monitoring one or more operational parameters of the vehicle. The fault detection technique contemplates storing a current time value at regular intervals during periods in which the recording device is provided with a source of main power. Inventor Doyle also teaches in the U.S. Pat. No. 5,815,071, a method and apparatus for monitoring parameters of vehicle electronic control units.


A “computerized vehicle log” is presented by Dan Kikinis of Saratoga Calif. in U.S. Pat. No. 5,815,093. The vehicle accident recording system employs a digital camera connected to a controller in nonvolatile memory, and an accident sensing interrupter. The oldest memory is overwritten by the newest images, until an accident is detected at which time the memory is blocked from further overwrites to protect the more vital images, which may include important information about the accident. Mr. Kikinis instructs that in preferred embodiments, the system has a communications port whereby stored images are downloaded after an accident to a digital device capable of displaying images. This feature is described in greater detail in the specification which indicates a wired download to a server having specialized image handling and processing software thereon.


Inventor Mr. Turner of Compton, Calif., no less, teaches an antitheft device for an automotive vehicle having both an audible alarm and visual monitor system. Video monitor operators are responsible for monitoring and handling an emergency situation and informing a 911 emergency station. This system is presented in U.S. Pat. No. 6,002,326.


A vehicle accident video recorder, in particular, a railroad vehicle accident video recorder, is taught by inventors Cox et al. In this system, a method and monitoring unit for recording the status of the railroad vehicle prior to a potential accident is presented. The monitoring unit continuously monitors the status of an emergency brake of the railroad vehicle and the status of a horn of the railroad vehicle. Video images are recorded and captured for a predetermined period of time after detecting that the emergency brake or horn blast has been applied as an event trigger. This invention is the subject of U.S. Pat. No. 6,088,635.


A vehicle crash data recorder is presented by inventor Ferguson of Bellaire, Ohio in U.S. Pat. No. 6,185,490. The apparatus is arranged with a three stage memory to record and retain information. And further it is equipped with a series and parallel connectors to provide instant on-scene access to accident data. It is important to note that Ferguson finds it important to include the possibility of on-site access to the data. Further, that Ferguson teaches use of a wired connection in the form of a serial or parallel hardwire connector. This teaching of Ferguson is common in many advanced systems configured as vehicle event recorders.


A traffic accident data recorder and traffic accident reproduction system and method is presented as U.S. Pat. No. 6,246,933. A plurality of sensors for registering vehicle operation parameters including at least one vehicle mounted digital video, audio camera is included for sensing storing and updating operational parameters. A rewritable, nonvolatile memory is provided for storing those processed operational parameters and video images and audio signals, which are provided by the microprocessor controller. Data is converted to a computer readable form and read by a computer such that an accident can be reconstructed via data collected.


U.S. Pat. No. 6,298,290 presented by Abe et al, teaches a memory apparatus for vehicle information data. A plurality of sensors including a CCD camera collision center of vehicle speed sensors, steering angle sensor, brake pressure sensor, acceleration sensor, are all coupled to a control unit. Further, the control unit passes information to a flash memory and a RAM memory subject to an encoder. The information collected is passed through a video output terminal. This illustrates another hardwire system and the importance placed by experts in the art on a computer hardware interface. This is partly due to the fact that video systems are typically data intensive and wired systems are necessary as they have bandwidth sufficient for transfers of large amounts of data.


Mazzilli of Bayside, N.Y. teaches in U.S. Pat. No. 6,333,759 a 360° automobile video camera system. A complex mechanical mount provides for a single camera to adjust its viewing angle giving a 360° range for video recording inside and outside of an automotive vehicle.


U.S. Pat. No. 6,389,339 granted to Inventor Just, of Alpharetta, Ga. teaches a vehicle operation monitoring system and method. Operation of a vehicle is monitored with an onboard video camera linked with a radio transceiver. A monitoring service includes a cellular telecommunications network to view a video data received from the transceiver to a home-base computer. These systems are aimed at parental monitoring of adolescent driving. The mobile modem is designed for transmitting live video information into the network as the vehicle travels.


Morgan, Hausman, Chilek, Hubenak, Kappler, Witz, and Wright with their heads together invented an advanced law enforcement and response technology in U.S. Pat. No. 6,411,874 granted Jun. 25, 2002. A central control system affords intuitive and easy control of numerous subsystems associated with a police car or other emergency vehicle. This highly integrated system provides advanced control apparatus which drives a plurality of detector systems including video and audio systems distributed about the vehicle. A primary feature included in this device includes an advanced user interface and display system, which permits high level driver interaction with the system.


Inventor Lambert teaches in U.S. Pat. No. 6,421,080 a “digital surveillance system with pre-event recording”. Pre-event recording is important in accident recording systems, because detection of the accident generally happens after the accident has occurred. A first memory is used for temporary storage. Images are stored in the temporary storage continuously until a trigger is activated which indicates an accident has occurred at which time images are transferred to a more permanent memory.


Systems taught by Gary Rayner in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,389,340; 6,405,112; 6,449,540; and 6,718,239, each directed to cameras for automobiles which capture video images, both of forward-looking and driver views, and store recorded images locally on a mass storage system. An operator, at the end of the vehicle service day, puts a wired connector into a device port and downloads information into a desktop computer system having specialized application software whereby the images and other information can be played-back and analyzed at a highly integrated user display interface.


It is not possible in the systems Rayner teaches for an administrative operator to manipulate or otherwise handle the data captured in the vehicle at an off-site location without human intervention. It is necessary for a download operator to transfer data captured from the recorder unit device to a disconnected computer system. While proprietary ‘DriveCam’ files can be e-mailed or otherwise transferred through the Internet, those files are in a format with a can only be digested by desktop software running at a remote computer. It is necessary to have the DriveCam desktop application on the remote computer. In order that the files be properly read. In this way, data captured by the vehicles is totally unavailable to some parties having an interest in the data. Namely those parties who do not have access to a computer appropriately arranged with the specific DriveCam application software. A second and major disadvantage is systems presented by Rayner includes necessity that a human operator service the equipment each day in a manual download action.


Remote reporting and manipulation of automobile systems is not entirely new. The following are very important teachings relating to some automobile systems having a wireless communications link component.


Inventors Fan et al, teach inventions of methods and systems for detecting vehicle collision using global positioning system GPS. The disclosure of Jun. 12, 2001 resulted in granted U.S. Pat. No. 6,459,988. A GPS receiver is combined with wireless technology to automatically report accident and third parties remotely located. A system uses the GPS signals to determine when an acceleration value exceeds the preset threshold which is meant to be indicative of an accident having occurred.


Of particular interest include inventions presented by inventors Nagda et al., in the document numbered U.S. Pat. No. 6,862,524 entitled using location data to determine trafficking route information. In this system for determining and disseminating traffic information or route information, traffic condition information is collected from mobile units that provide their location or position information. Further route information may be utilized to determine whether a mobile unit is allowed or prohibited from traveling along a certain route.


A common assignee, @Road Inc., owns the preceding two patents in addition to the following: U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,529,159; 6,552,682; 6,594,576; 6,664,922; 6,795,017; 6,832,140; 6,867,733; 6,882,313; and 6,922,566. As such, @Road Inc., must be considered a major innovator in position technologies arts as they relate to mobile vehicles and remote server computers.


General Motors Corp. teaches in U.S. Pat. No. 6,728,612, an automated telematics test system and method. The invention provides a method and system testing a telematics system in a mobile vehicle a test command from a test center to a call center is based on a test script. The mobile vehicle is continuously in contact by way of cellular communication networks with a remotely located host computer.


Inventor Earl Diem and Delphi Technologies Inc., had granted to them on Sep. 20, 2005, U.S. Pat. No. 6,947,817. The nonintrusive diagnostic tool for sensing oxygen sensor operation include a scheme or an oxygen analyzer deployed in a mobile vehicle communicates by way of an access point to a remotely located server. A diagnostic heuristic is used to analyze the data and confirm proper operation of the sensor. Analysis may be performed by a mainframe computer quickly note from the actual oxygen sensor.


Similar patents including special relationships between mobile vehicles and remote host computers include those presented by various inventors in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,735,503; 6,739,078; 6,760,757; 6,810,362; 6,832,141; and 6,850,823.


Another special group of inventions owned by Reynolds and Reynolds Holding Inc., is taught first by Lightner et al, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,928,348 issued Aug. 9, 2005. In these inventions, Internet based emission tests are performed on vehicles having special wireless couplings to computer networks. Data may be further transferred to entities of particular interest including the EPA or California Air Resources Board, for example, or particular insurance companies and other organizations concerned with vehicle emissions and environment.


Other patents held by Reynolds and Reynolds Holding Inc., include those relating to reporting of automobile performance parameters to remote servers via wireless links. Specifically, an onboard data bus OBD system is coupled to a microprocessor, by way of a standard electrical connector. The microprocessor periodically receives data and transmits it into the wireless communications system. This information is more fully described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,636,790 granted Oct. 21, 2003. Inventors Lightner et al, present method and apparatus for remotely characterizing the vehicle performance. Data at the onboard data by his periodically received by a microprocessor and passed into a local transmitter. The invention specifically calls out transmission of data on a predetermined time interval. Thus these inventions do not anticipate nor include processing and analysis steps which result in data being passed at time other than expiration of the predetermined time period.


Reynolds and Reynolds Holding Inc., further describes systems where motor vehicles are coupled by wireless communications links to remote host servers in U.S. Pat. No. 6,732,031.


While systems and inventions of the art are designed to achieve particular goals and objectives, some of those being no less than remarkable, these inventions have limitations which prevent their use in new ways now possible. Inventions of the art are not used and cannot be used to realize the advantages and objectives of the inventions taught herefollowing.


The inventions disclosure of U.S. patent application filed Dec. 9, 2005 having Ser. No. 11/299,028 is presented by this same inventor. Further, another U.S. application filed Dec. 8, 2005 having Ser. No. 11/297,669 is similarly presented by same inventor. In addition, another U.S. application filed Dec. 7, 2005, entitled: “Memory Management in Event Recording Systems” serial number unknown; this application will be amended to properly reflect the serial number as soon as it is known, is also presented by instant inventor. Each of these disclosures include material which is critically important to a full understanding of important concepts relating to vehicle event recording systems. Accordingly, these disclosures are hereby incorporated here by explicit reference.


SUMMARY OF THESE INVENTIONS

Comes now, James Plante with inventions of vehicle event recorders having integrated web servers.


Vehicle event recorders having integrated web server modules are first presented herein this disclosure. A vehicle event recorder is arranged as a video camera, microprocessor, memory among other supporting subsystems such that when a predetermined event occurs, in example a car crash or unexpected impact, a video record of the incident is preserved. In these inventions, such vehicle event recorders are further provided with an advanced interface system. A web server module is incorporated and arranged as part of the included computer system. Thus, the system and all its subsystems may be addressed via hypertext transfer protocol, http, type transactions and commands. Users can interact with vehicle event recorder units of these inventions with nothing other than any standard computer. It is no longer necessary to load, manage, and maintain, proprietary application specific software on a user's workstation computer. Rather, a user may manipulate system settings, view and transfer files, receive e-mail alerts, and otherwise completely control the device as its functionality is entirely exposed by the integrated web server and complementary computing systems.


As a consumer product, a vehicle event recorder may be installed in a family vehicle without special knowledge or skill. The device operates to collect video and other vehicle performance information while the vehicle is in normal operation. Upon connection to a computer network, or more specifically a home computer network, a simple computer workstation equipped with a web browser can address the vehicle event recorder as the web server is responsive to requests sent by the web browser.


In addition, these systems include pre-programmed ‘web pages’ or ‘web forms’. These pages may be implemented as computer files stored in a ROM or DRAM, et cetera, of the vehicle event recorder. They are pre-programmed with interconnects and preset relationships with subsystems. For example, these pages may be provide an interface to camera settings such as brightness and contrast, et cetera.


Further, in some versions, a file transfer protocol server and simple mail transfer protocol servers are also included. These servers also support general interface mechanisms which permit standard computers to interact with these vehicle event recorders without requiring installation of special software and hardware systems.


OBJECTIVES OF THESE INVENTIONS

It is a primary object of these inventions to provide vehicle event recorders and vehicle event recorder systems.


It is an object of these inventions to provide vehicle event recorders with an improved user interface.


It is a further object to eliminate previously required workstation desktop applications and complex external communications mechanisms and protocol.


It is an object of these inventions to provide interface to vehicle event recording systems via standard computing platforms and ubiquitous software.


A better understanding can be had with reference to detailed description of preferred embodiments and with reference to appended drawings. Embodiments presented are particular ways to realize these inventions and are not inclusive of all ways possible. Therefore, there may exist embodiments that do not deviate from the spirit and scope of this disclosure as set forth by appended claims, but do not appear here as specific examples. It will be appreciated that a great plurality of alternative versions are possible.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING FIGURES

These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with regard to the following description, appended claims and drawings where:



FIG. 1 is a simple block diagram showing relationships between primary elements of systems of these inventions;



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a vehicle event recorder head;



FIG. 3 illustrates the relationship a vehicle event recorder video camera has with its exterior and further illustrates other important elements of the vehicle event recorder head;



FIG. 4 illustrates transactions over a network element of these vehicle event recorder systems;



FIG. 5 illustrates an example browser type user interface associated with these systems;



FIG. 6 illustrates a second page of a browser having various system control functions which may be manipulated via the browser;



FIG. 7 illustrates an important network architecture and connection associated with these systems;



FIG. 8 illustrates in diagram several additional important functions which may be incorporated within a vehicle event recorder head; and



FIG. 9 illustrates an important network configuration which permits remote access to vehicle event recorder heads.





GLOSSARY OF SPECIAL TERMS

Throughout this disclosure, reference is made to some terms which may or may not be exactly defined in popular dictionaries as they are defined here. To provide a more precise disclosure, the following terms are presented with a view to clarity so that the true breadth and scope may be more readily appreciated. Although every attempt is made to be precise and thorough, it is a necessary condition that not all meanings associated with each term can be completely set forth. Accordingly, each term is intended to also include its common meaning which may be derived from general usage within the pertinent arts or by dictionary meaning. Where the presented definition is in conflict with a dictionary or arts definition, one must use the context of use and liberal discretion to arrive at an intended meaning. One will be well advised to error on the side of attaching broader meanings to terms used in order to fully appreciate the depth of the teaching and to understand all the intended variations.


Web Browser


A web browser is a computer graphical user interface operable for receiving computer files and presenting a graphical display which may have interactive elements sometimes called ‘controls’ or web controls. Further, a browser is operable for sending requests in the form of a computer file—generally both received and sent files are in a format such as XML or more familiarly HTML.


Web Server


A web server is implemented as a special module of a computer and is operable for exchanging information via computer files—generally files in XML/HTML formats. A web server receives requests and returns responses to external parties via a communications link.


Web Request


A web request is a data transmission arranged in agreement with Internet protocol directed to a specific web server.


Web Response


A web response is a data transmission by a web server arranged in agreement with Internet protocol and directed toward a requesting agent usually a web browser.


Physical Anomaly


Any change in a prescribed physical parameter which is defined as outside the scope of normal operating conditions.


Managed Loop Memory


A ‘managed loop memory’ is a memory system arranged to preserve in detail data captured during a period immediately past with respect to any instant but to overwrite that data with newer data when that data has sufficiently aged in accordance with a predefined expiration definition.


Vehicle Environments


The environment in and about a vehicle includes those spaces interior or exterior with respect to the car body. That is to say, traffic ahead of, behind, towards the sides of, and inside the driver compartment are all included as vehicle environments.


Communications Port


Includes means for supporting a data communications link including a transceiver or modem arrangement and suitable connection apparatus. Some examples include: a mobile cellular transceiver; WiFi; WiMax; bluetooth; Ethernet; serial port such as RS-232; among others.


PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS OF THESE INVENTIONS

In accordance with each of preferred embodiments of these inventions, vehicle event recorders having integrated Web servers are provided. It will be appreciated that each of embodiments described include apparatus and that the apparatus of one preferred embodiment may be different than an apparatus of an alternative embodiment.


Vehicle event recorders first presented here are generally characterized as including: a video camera, microprocessor, memory, and web server module. Video images are captured during use of the vehicle. When a particular ‘event’ occurs, a captured video series is saved to a durable memory. When the vehicle is returned to a location where network connectivity is available, the captured video series is made available for review via a web server. The integrated web server, when connected to a TCP/IP network, can receive requests for information from external web browsers. These requests for information may be directed as requests to view data captured during a recent previous operation period. The web server is suitably coupled to a memory whereby data and files stored there may be transferred to the requesting web browser. Accordingly, web servers of these systems expose data captured by the device, including video data of scenes about the vehicle captured during vehicle use. In addition, these web servers are also coupled to system settings and operational parameters whereby adjustments to those settings and parameters may be effected via a web browser. For example, trigger threshold values may be set to be more or less sensitive. An event trigger system arranged to detect an abrupt acceleration action may include an adjustable sensitivity level. Via web browser interface, the event trigger threshold can be set by a remote user operating a standard web browser in communication with the device web server. A web server is part of a complement pair which forms a user interface system. A web server and web browser connected together via a TCP/IP network form an interface system which is convenient and very powerful. Complete control of the device is permitted because prerecorded “web pages” or “web forms” may be prepared as part of the web server. These pages and the controls thereon may be coupled to physical systems of the device. In this way, the user having no other tools than a standard computer with a web browser is able to completely interface with the system. As such, proprietary software and the complexity and inconvenience associated therewith are completely eliminated.


With reference to FIG. 1, the reader will gain further appreciation of architecture relating to apparatus of these inventions. In particular, vehicle event recorder head unit 1 with integrated web server 2 is installed in a motor vehicle such as a common family car 3. The vehicle event recorder head is coupled by way of a data communications link 4, preferably a TCP/IP network to a computer workstation 5 operable for running a web browser 6. The arrangement provides a graphical user interface to a remotely located user 7, and further, means of remote input and interaction with the vehicle event recorder by way of common computer keyboard 8 for example. A user, in the comfort of a computer workplace, can provide a vehicle event recorder mounted in an automobile with instruction, update, interaction, download, review, among others. Functionality exposed by the vehicle event recorder becomes available to users working at a workstation by way of a common computer or ‘Internet browser’ graphical user interface. For example, a user can use simple browser control interfaces to set the camera contrast and brightness while at a workstation not in, or even not near, the car.


A vehicle event recorder with integrated web server is installed in the vehicle whereby a video camera has a clear view of the space and surroundings in front of the car. In this way, should the unfortunate occasion of a traffic accident occur, the video camera can provide a video record of traffic conditions and events leading up to the accident. A video series, including images captured just prior and just after an event moment as initiated by an event trigger, the series relating to an accident, is saved in a vehicle event recorder local memory. At a later time, when the vehicle is appropriately coupled to a workstation by suitable communications link, video series data can be transferred to the workstation where it may be further viewed and analyzed. A vehicle may be coupled to a workstation by communications link of several alternative forms including at least an Ethernet hardware connection, a WiFi wireless communications link, a Bluetooth communications link, a wireless mobile telephone network link, among others. Workstations used in these arrangements are of the type common to nearly every desktop in every home or office. While a workstation alone is insufficient for interacting with vehicle event recorders of these inventions, a workstation with a ‘web browser’ or ‘Internet browser’ such as the Windows™ Internet Explorer is an ideal combination for providing access to vehicle event recorders so arranged. Of course, competing web browsers such as FireFox, Opera, Konqueror, Safari, Gecko, et cetera may be used with nearly identical effect. In all cases, these browsers will communicate with a vehicle event recorder because they all can read, parse and produce appropriate XML and HTML transactions. Thus, it is not necessary for users of these systems to buy, subscribe to, install, learn to use, maintain, update, re-install, among others, any proprietary software. Rather, these vehicle event recorders expose their functionality to any computer running a web browser of a user's choice.


In all prior art versions of similar systems, workstations are coupled to vehicle event recorders by way of proprietary application-specific software running on the workstation. Thus, it is impossible in those systems to manipulate and control a vehicle event recorder with a general purpose computer not having specially prepared programming. Data exchanges between a workstation application of the prior art and those vehicle event recorders typically include proprietary calls and file and object formats not compatible with general-purpose applications. In contrast, as the unique vehicle event recorders first presented here include a built-in web server, users have access to inner workings and settings of the vehicle event recorder by way of ‘http’ transactions. Further, simple data transfer including large video files may be taken up and handled by the same web server or by an accompanying ftp (file transfer protocol) server.


In some preferred versions, data communications link 4 is a common home network. A vehicle parked in the household garage becomes coupled to the home network by way of its proximity to a WiFi router for example. When a teenage driver returns home, mom instantly has access to information including video of her children's driving activity by way of her Internet browser.


A top-level block diagram of a video event recorder is presented as FIG. 2. Video event recorders 21 of these inventions are comprised of the primary elements including: a video camera 22, a microprocessor 23, a web server 24, memory 25, and a communications port 26. A typical arrangement of a vehicle event recorder includes having these elements combined within a small plastic housing suitable for being mounted near or at a car windshield. It is preferable to install these devices on the interior portions of a vehicle in the passenger/occupant space. While the elements described together in combination form a vehicle event recorder head, sometimes reference herein is made to a ‘vehicle event recorder system’. When a head unit is coupled with a network or communications path which includes a workstation or other server remote from the vehicle event recorder head, the ensemble is considered a ‘vehicle event recorder system’.



FIG. 3 presents further detail with regard to the architecture of these vehicle event recorders 31. The camera field-of-view 32 may be arranged in ‘forward looking’ direction such that images of activity ahead of the vehicle are captured by the camera. Thus, it is said that the camera is coupled to environments about the vehicle. The video camera is further coupled electronically 33 to the microprocessor whereby the camera may transmit image data thereto. The microprocessor is further coupled electronically 34 to a memory which may be managed by the microprocessor to store image series associated with particular events such as traffic accidents. For example, upon receipt of signal from an event trigger 35, a short video series stored in managed loop memory 36, may be transferred to a more permanent stable memory, such as a high-capacity flash type memory 37. Finally, the web server 38 is coupled to a communications port 39 which permits the web server to interact with exterior computing systems.


In some preferred versions, cameras are arranged as forward looking cameras, others are rearward looking cameras, and still others as driver compartment view cameras. The number of cameras associated with a single vehicle recorder unit is meant to be not limited to one.


In preferred versions, a local memory is arranged to capture and preserve video information associated with a time prior to, and after, an important event. A managed loop memory includes an overwrite process which preserves data for a limited time and overwrites data as soon as it has aged in accordance with an overwrite scheme. Upon the occurrence of a ‘triggered event’—a car crash for example—the loop memory data is transferred to a buffer where it may be saved without subject to overwrite for an extended time.


An event trigger is arranged to detect a physical anomaly such as a high acceleration associated with a crash or other impact; alternatively a heavy swear or excessive braking maneuver; or even as a response to a panic button strike. The event trigger declares the occurrence of an incident and sets the memory to preserve all data associated with the incident or event.


A web server of these systems preferably includes preformed ‘web pages’ or sometimes ‘web forms’. In some advanced versions, these can be arranged in accordance with the Microsoft technology ASP.NET or sometimes referred to as Active Server Pages. These pages offer great latitude in providing web controls which are coupled to the internal systems of the vehicle event recorder systems. For example, the video camera may be controlled in that its contrast, brightness and intensity can be manipulated via such web controls on ASP.NET pages.


Because a car is easily coupled to a home computer network via a WiFi system, preferred versions include vehicle event recorder units having an output port fashioned as a WiFi or WiMax transceiver. Alternatives may include other radio type transceivers such as bluetooth, or optical type wireless links such as those which exploit infrared optical coupling. Of course, while not as convenient, it is entirely possible that a parked car be coupled to a home network via a hardwired Ethernet connection. A vehicle event recorder arranged with a common network interface card could be plugged in with hardwire (RJ45 type connector) to a local Ethernet system.


A web server is sometimes considered a part of the microprocessor or other computing platform, as it may be embodied as a computer code module running thereon. In FIG. 3, it is drawn separately from the microprocessor to bring emphasis to its importance. While known vehicle event recorders have been arranged with common microprocessors, it is first suggested here that a web server module be included and provide interface between a vehicle event recorder microprocessor and an external computing system. In this way, access to the microprocessor and vehicle event recorder subsystem functionality is provided to any computer system which address the web server with appropriate http transactions. That is, the web server is arranged to receive well-formed http requests (in example, http ‘GET’ commands), and further to provide responses constructed as http answers (http ‘POST’ responses).



FIG. 4 illustrates more clearly a particular example of a transaction between a user operating at a computer workstation 41, with installed Web browser 42, linked by a communications link to a vehicle event recorder 43 having integrated web server 44 installed in a common family automobile 45. From the workstation keyboard, the user 46 may inquire as to the state of the vehicle event recorder by sending an http request in the form of a GET type command 47. A GET command is fashioned as an http request and includes the URL of the source being addressed—the ‘web address’ of the vehicle event recorder; and perhaps an introduction web form or home/default web form. For example, a particular web page providing access to certain desired functionality may have a URL as follows: “http://192.168.1.8/camerasettings.aspx”. A GET command 47 including that URL is formed by and transmitted from the workstation's web browser to the vehicle event recorder's web server (having IP address 192.168.1.8). Upon receipt of the GET command, the web server responds by providing a POST action 48—an http response. The POST action may include transmission of an XML or/and HTML coded web page, which may be appropriately interpreted and displayed by the web browser and its graphical user interface or sometimes ‘window’ presented to the user on a system monitor 49.


To better explain what is meant by the phrase: ‘the state of the vehicle event recorder’ presented above, one might consider the following text in conjunction with the drawing presented as FIG. 5. FIG. 5 illustrates an example of a web page served by the web server of a vehicle event recorder. A web page is sometimes comprised a interactive objects sometimes and herein referred to as “web controls”. These include such controls commonly known as: ‘menus’; ‘toolbars’; ‘drop-down boxes’; ‘listboxes’; ‘radio buttons’; ‘checkboxes’; ‘sliders’; ‘textboxes’, among others. In FIG. 5, browser window 51 includes a field having a page title 52: “SmartDrive™ Camera Setup”. Further, the browser window includes a graphical element known as a menu or menu bar 53, and toolbar 54. Icons associated with various functionality are laid across a horizontal strip. When a user ‘clicks’ any of these icons, it sets into motion a computer code module to effect some operation. A very important aspect of any web browser include the address line 55. An address line may contain the URL or web address of the source currently displayed. This address may be typed-in manually by a user, or it may have been arrived at by way of a hyperlink from another page displayed previously in the browser window. Typical web browser windows further include other interactive objects such as a search engine interface including a drop-down box 56, a command button controls 57, slider controls 58, textboxes 59, an ‘option’ or radio buttons 510. From these web controls, a user interface is brought about and designed for interaction with the available functions in a vehicle event recorder hosting the associated web pages on its web server. A user may adjust a control and thereafter send the state of the web page to the vehicle event recorder unit. This is accomplished by ‘pointing’ and ‘clicking’ to change the control settings and then submitting the page or posting the page to the web server in the vehicle event recorder. In example, one may adjust the contrast of the camera by using slider control 58 and thereafter submit button 511 which results in the page being posted back to the web server and ultimately the contrast being improved. A careful observer will note that each of command button controls 57 may lead to a different association of certain functions in groups. The functions of the camera are grouped into those which are displayed in that field 512. If the command button associated with system functions is chosen, then the available functions in field may change without appreciable change to the general form of the page. FIG. 6 illustrates.


A group of controls associated with system function is presented in the diagram of FIG. 6 which is a graphical user interface embodied as a web page 61. Command button control 62 associated with the system settings is called at the browser by way of this page's URL http://192.168.1.8/systemsettings.htm 63. The page permits a user to adjust the IP address 64 of the vehicle event recorder at textbox 65. A user may choose a particular enhanced timeline at a drop down box 66 as prescribed by those available in a managed loop memory system. User data/profile can be entered at textbox 67 and command button 68 can be used to save a username to a memory in the vehicle event recorder. Finally, a trigger threshold can be set on a continuous slider control 69 to make an event trigger in the vehicle event recorder either more or less sensitive. In this way, a user at a remote computer running a simple internet browser makes adjustments directly to a vehicle event recorder installed in a vehicle.


While sometimes these web servers are arranged with pre-programmed ‘web page’ objects addressable via web request actions, they may also include programmed modules known as web services. These functions, properties and events, do not have a user interface associated with them, however they include transaction interface which permits their being addressed via TCP/IP web requests. These functions, properties and events may be coupled to subsystems of the vehicle event recorder head. For example, an ‘authorized users list’ may be adjusted whereby log-on actions by users are enabled/disabled. This web service may be taken up automatically in response to some condition being met. Therefore, without user interaction via a web page, but rather by purely automated processes, i.e. web services, these vehicle event recorder systems may be adjusted and otherwise manipulated.


Best modes of these inventions are illustrated in FIG. 7. A vehicle 71 is prepared with a vehicle event recorder unit 72 having therewith an integrated web server 73. A communications port, in example a WiFi transceiver 74 permits the vehicle event recorder to connect wirelessly to a home network by way of complimentary WiFi transceiver/router 75. When the car enters a zone or space 76 served by the transceiver/router, the vehicle event recorder web server is accessible by a user 77 operating workstation 78 running a web browser 79 program. The user may adjust, upload, download, browse, and otherwise interact with the vehicle event record and data stored on the vehicle event recorder.


In special advanced versions, vehicle event recorders additionally include modules other than a simple web server. For example, an vehicle event recorder may additionally include a file exchange and e-mail server systems. FIG. 8 shows graphically a vehicle event recorder 81 for use in conjunction with vehicle 82, the vehicle event recorder comprising an integrated web server 83, a file transport protocol ftp server 84, and an e-mail (SMTP) server 85. The web browser 86 at a user workstation 87 similarly communicates with these elements in a conventional way to bring about these functions in a vehicle event recorder. In this way, automatic triggers can be arranged in the vehicle event recorder such that it can send e-mail messages in response to certain events having been ‘fired’ in the normal processing of the system. When something of interest occurs, an e-mail message is prepared and queued. On the next occasion where the vehicle event recorder is connected to the internet, the SMTP sends the e-mail to the intended recipient. In a similar fashion, the vehicle event recorder ftp server operates to send and receive data files.


While most preferred versions are arranged with the primary objective being a home, family or small number user local systems, these inventions are also meant to include as a special case the need for remote operation. A private home computer network can be arranged with a public port which exposes certain services through a firewall to the public internet. In this way, a vacationing parent can still have a look at the vehicle use records from afar. Vehicle 91 equipped with vehicle event recorder 92 having integrated web server communicates with local radio 93 as it enters communications space 94. the mere act of the vehicle entering 95 the space causes the vehicle event recorder to become connected to the network which may include the Internet. Accordingly, a communications link 96 of many thousands of miles is possible whereby a user 97 working on any workstation 98 equipped with a browser can address the web, file and mail servers of the remotely located vehicle event recorder.


One will now fully appreciate how a vehicle event recorder having an integrated web server is used to provide simple user access to operation and function of these systems. Although the present inventions have been described in considerable detail with clear and concise language and with reference to certain preferred versions thereof including best modes anticipated by the inventors, other versions are possible. Therefore, the spirit and scope of the invention should not be limited by the description of the preferred versions contained therein, but rather by the claims appended hereto.

Claims
  • 1. A vehicle event recorder comprising: a video camera configured to acquire visual information representing a vehicle environment, the vehicle environment including spaces in and around an interior and an exterior of a vehicle;a memory configured to electronically store information;an event trigger configured to detect a vehicle event responsive to an event parameter breaching an event trigger threshold level; anda microprocessor configured to: responsive to detection of the vehicle event, effectuate storage of visual information associated with the vehicle event in the memory;facilitate wireless communication of information between the vehicle event recorder and a remotely located computing device using HTTP;receive settings information from the remotely located computing device, wherein the settings information is operable to adjust vehicle event recorder settings pertaining to operation of one or both of the video camera and the event trigger, andadjust the vehicle event recorder settings based on the received settings information.
  • 2. The vehicle event recorder of claim 1, wherein the microprocessor is further configured to cause communication of the visual information associated with the vehicle event stored in the memory to the remotely located computing device.
  • 3. The vehicle event recorder of claim 2, wherein the remotely located computing device: determines adjustments to the vehicle event recorder settings based on one or more previously detected vehicle events, the one or more previously detected vehicle events including the vehicle event detected by the event trigger; andcommunicates the settings information indicating the determined adjustments to the microprocessor.
  • 4. The vehicle event recorder of claim 1, wherein the microprocessor is further configured to adjust the vehicle event recorder settings based on settings information received from a user via the remotely located computing device.
  • 5. The vehicle event recorder of claim 4, wherein the microprocessor is further configured such that facilitating wireless communication includes generating one or more web pages for presentation to the user via a web browser on the remotely located computing device, the one or more web pages configured to receive entry and/or selection of the settings information from the user.
  • 6. The vehicle event recorder of claim 5, wherein the microprocessor is further configured such that the one or more web pages comprise one or more fields configured to receive entry and/or selection of the settings information from the user.
  • 7. The vehicle event recorder of claim 1, wherein the microprocessor is further configured such that the vehicle event recorder settings include an event trigger threshold level, the event trigger threshold level adjusted based on threshold settings information received from the remotely located computing device, the threshold settings information entered and/or selected by a user via a trigger threshold control field presented by the remotely located computing device, the threshold settings information indicating a desired event trigger threshold level from the user.
  • 8. The vehicle event recorder of claim 7, wherein the microprocessor is further configured such that the trigger threshold control field facilitates adjustment of a sensitivity of the event trigger, wherein adjusting a sensitivity of the event trigger comprises an increase and/or decrease in the event trigger threshold level made directly by the user via the trigger threshold control field.
  • 9. The vehicle event recorder of claim 8, wherein the microprocessor is further configured such that the trigger threshold control field includes a web page object control button configured to be manipulated by the user to adjust the sensitivity of the event trigger.
  • 10. The vehicle event recorder of claim 1, further comprising an output port configured to facilitate the wireless communication between the vehicle event recorder and the remotely located computing device,wherein the microprocessor is further configured such that the vehicle event recorder settings are associated with one or more of the video camera, the memory, the event trigger, or the output port.
  • 11. A computer implemented method for adjusting vehicle event recorder settings with a vehicle event recorder, the vehicle event recorder comprising a video camera, a memory, an event trigger, and a processor, the method comprising: acquiring, with the video camera, visual information representing a vehicle environment, the vehicle environment including spaces in and around an interior and an exterior of a vehicle;detecting, with the event trigger, a vehicle event responsive to an event parameter breaching an event trigger threshold level;responsive to detecting the vehicle event, effectuate, with the processor, storage of visual information associated with the vehicle event in an electronic memory;facilitating, with the processor, wireless communication of information between the vehicle event recorder and a remotely located computing device using HTTP;receiving settings information from the remotely located computing device, wherein the settings information is operable to adjust vehicle event recorder settings pertaining to operation of one or both of the video camera and the event trigger; andadjusting, with the processor, the vehicle event recorder settings based on the received settings information.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, further comprising causing communication of the visual information associated with the vehicle event stored in the memory to the remotely located computing device.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, further comprising: determining adjustments to the vehicle event recorder settings based on one or more previously detected vehicle events; andcommunicating the settings information indicating the determined adjustments.
  • 14. The method of claim 11, further comprising adjusting the vehicle event recorder settings based on settings information received from a user via the remotely located computing device.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, wherein facilitating wireless communication includes generating one or more web pages for presentation to the user via a web browser on the remotely located computing device, the one or more web pages configured to receive entry and/or selection of the settings information from the user.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, wherein the one or more web pages comprise one or more fields configured to receive entry and/or selection of the settings information from the user.
  • 17. The method of claim 11, wherein the vehicle event recorder settings include an event trigger threshold level, the event trigger threshold level adjusted based on threshold settings information received from the remotely located computing device, the threshold settings information entered and/or selected by a user via a trigger threshold control field presented by the remotely located computing device, the threshold settings information indicating a desired event trigger threshold level from the user.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, wherein the trigger threshold control field facilitates adjustment of a sensitivity of the event trigger, wherein adjusting a sensitivity of the event trigger comprises an increase and/or decrease in the event trigger threshold level made directly by the user via the trigger threshold control field.
  • 19. The method of claim 18, wherein the trigger threshold control field includes a web page object control button configured to be manipulated by the user to adjust the sensitivity of the event trigger.
  • 20. The method of claim 19, further comprising facilitating the wireless communication between the vehicle event recorder and the remotely located computing device with an output port of the vehicle event recorder,wherein the vehicle event recorder settings are associated with one or more of the video camera, the memory, the event trigger, or the output port.
US Referenced Citations (852)
Number Name Date Kind
673203 Freund Apr 1901 A
673795 Hammer May 1901 A
673907 Johnson May 1901 A
676075 McDougall Jun 1901 A
679511 Richards Jul 1901 A
681036 Burg Aug 1901 A
681283 Waynick Aug 1901 A
681998 Swift Sep 1901 A
683155 Thompson Sep 1901 A
683214 Mansfield Sep 1901 A
684276 Lonergan Oct 1901 A
685082 Wood Oct 1901 A
685969 Campbell Nov 1901 A
686545 Selph Nov 1901 A
689849 Brown Dec 1901 A
691982 Sturgis Jan 1902 A
692834 Davis Feb 1902 A
694781 Prinz Mar 1902 A
2943141 Knight Jun 1960 A
3634866 Meyer Jan 1972 A
3781824 Caiati Dec 1973 A
3812287 Lemelson May 1974 A
3885090 Rosenbaum May 1975 A
3992656 Joy Nov 1976 A
4054752 Dennis Oct 1977 A
4072850 McGlynn Feb 1978 A
4258421 Juhasz Mar 1981 A
4271358 Schwarz Jun 1981 A
4276609 Patel Jun 1981 A
4280151 Tsunekawa Jul 1981 A
4281354 Conte Jul 1981 A
4401976 Stadelmayr Aug 1983 A
4409670 Herndon Oct 1983 A
4420773 Toyoda Dec 1983 A
4425097 Owens Jan 1984 A
4456931 Toyoda Jun 1984 A
4489351 d'Alayer de Costemore Dec 1984 A
4496995 Colles Jan 1985 A
4500868 Tokitsu Feb 1985 A
4528547 Rodney Jul 1985 A
4533962 Decker Aug 1985 A
4558379 Hutter Dec 1985 A
4588267 Pastore May 1986 A
4593313 Nagasaki Jun 1986 A
4621335 Bluish Nov 1986 A
4625210 Sagl Nov 1986 A
4630110 Cotton Dec 1986 A
4632348 Keesling Dec 1986 A
4638289 Zottnik Jan 1987 A
4646241 Ratchford Feb 1987 A
4651143 Yamanaka Mar 1987 A
4671111 Lemelson Jun 1987 A
4718685 Kawabe Jan 1988 A
4754255 Sanders Jun 1988 A
4758888 Lapidot Jul 1988 A
4763745 Eto Aug 1988 A
4785474 Bernstein Nov 1988 A
4789904 Peterson Dec 1988 A
4794566 Richards Dec 1988 A
4804937 Barbiaux Feb 1989 A
4806931 Nelson Feb 1989 A
4807096 Skogler Feb 1989 A
4814896 Heitzman Mar 1989 A
4837628 Sasaki Jun 1989 A
4839631 Tsuji Jun 1989 A
4843463 Michetti Jun 1989 A
4843578 Wade Jun 1989 A
4853856 Hanway Aug 1989 A
4853859 Morita Aug 1989 A
4866616 Takeuchi Sep 1989 A
4876597 Roy Oct 1989 A
4883349 Mittelhauser Nov 1989 A
4896855 Furnish Jan 1990 A
4926331 Windle May 1990 A
4930742 Schofield Jun 1990 A
4936533 Adams Jun 1990 A
4939652 Steiner Jul 1990 A
4942464 Milatz Jul 1990 A
4945244 Castleman Jul 1990 A
4949186 Peterson Aug 1990 A
4980913 Skret Dec 1990 A
4987541 Levente Jan 1991 A
4992943 McCracken Feb 1991 A
4993068 Piosenka Feb 1991 A
4995086 Lilley Feb 1991 A
5012335 Cohodar Apr 1991 A
5027104 Reid Jun 1991 A
5046007 McCrery Sep 1991 A
5050166 Cantoni Sep 1991 A
5056056 Gustin Oct 1991 A
5057820 Markson Oct 1991 A
5096287 Kakinami Mar 1992 A
5100095 Haan Mar 1992 A
5111289 Lucas May 1992 A
5140434 Van Aug 1992 A
5140436 Blessinger Aug 1992 A
5144661 Shamosh Sep 1992 A
5178448 Adams Jan 1993 A
5185700 Bezos Feb 1993 A
5196938 Blessinger Mar 1993 A
5223844 Mansell Jun 1993 A
5224211 Roe Jun 1993 A
5262813 Scharton Nov 1993 A
5283433 Tsien Feb 1994 A
5294978 Katayama Mar 1994 A
5305214 Komatsu Apr 1994 A
5305216 Okura Apr 1994 A
5308247 Dyrdek May 1994 A
5309485 Chao May 1994 A
5311197 Sorden May 1994 A
5321753 Gritton Jun 1994 A
5327288 Wellington Jul 1994 A
5330149 Haan Jul 1994 A
5343527 Moore Aug 1994 A
5353023 Mitsugi Oct 1994 A
5361326 Aparicio Nov 1994 A
5387926 Bellan Feb 1995 A
5388045 Kamiya Feb 1995 A
5388208 Weingartner Feb 1995 A
5404330 Lee Apr 1995 A
5408330 Squicciarini Apr 1995 A
5422543 Weinberg Jun 1995 A
5430431 Nelson Jul 1995 A
5430432 Camhi Jul 1995 A
5435184 Pineroli Jul 1995 A
5445024 Riley Aug 1995 A
5445027 Zoerner Aug 1995 A
5446659 Yamawaki Aug 1995 A
5455625 Englander Oct 1995 A
5455716 Suman Oct 1995 A
5465079 Bouchard Nov 1995 A
5473729 Bryant Dec 1995 A
5477141 Naether Dec 1995 A
5495242 Kick Feb 1996 A
5495243 McKenna Feb 1996 A
5497419 Hill Mar 1996 A
5499182 Ousborne Mar 1996 A
5504482 Schreder Apr 1996 A
5513011 Matsumoto Apr 1996 A
5515285 Garrett May 1996 A
5519260 Washington May 1996 A
5521633 Nakajima May 1996 A
5523811 Wada Jun 1996 A
5526269 Ishibashi Jun 1996 A
5530420 Tsuchiya Jun 1996 A
5532678 Kin Jul 1996 A
5537156 Katayama Jul 1996 A
5539454 Williams Jul 1996 A
5541590 Nishio Jul 1996 A
5544060 Fujii Aug 1996 A
5546191 Hibi Aug 1996 A
5546305 Kondo Aug 1996 A
5548273 Nicol Aug 1996 A
5552990 Ihara Sep 1996 A
5559496 Dubats Sep 1996 A
5568211 Bamford Oct 1996 A
5570087 Lemelson Oct 1996 A
5570127 Schmidt Oct 1996 A
5574424 Nguyen Nov 1996 A
5574443 Hsieh Nov 1996 A
D376571 Kokat Dec 1996 S
5581464 Woll Dec 1996 A
5586130 Doyle Dec 1996 A
5590948 Moreno Jan 1997 A
5596382 Bamford Jan 1997 A
5600775 King Feb 1997 A
5608272 Tanguay Mar 1997 A
5610580 Lai Mar 1997 A
5612686 Takano Mar 1997 A
5631638 Kaspar May 1997 A
5638273 Coiner Jun 1997 A
5642106 Hancock Jun 1997 A
5646856 Kaesser Jul 1997 A
5652706 Morimoto Jul 1997 A
RE35590 Bezos Aug 1997 E
5654892 Fujii Aug 1997 A
5659355 Barron Aug 1997 A
5666120 Kline Sep 1997 A
5667176 Zamarripa Sep 1997 A
5669698 Veldman Sep 1997 A
5671451 Takahashi Sep 1997 A
5677979 Squicciarini Oct 1997 A
5680117 Arai Oct 1997 A
5680123 Lee Oct 1997 A
5686765 Washington Nov 1997 A
5686889 Hillis Nov 1997 A
5689442 Swanson Nov 1997 A
5696705 Zykan Dec 1997 A
5706362 Yabe Jan 1998 A
5706909 Bevins Jan 1998 A
5712679 Coles Jan 1998 A
5717456 Rudt Feb 1998 A
5719554 Gagnon Feb 1998 A
5758299 Sandborg May 1998 A
5781101 Stephen Jul 1998 A
5781145 Williams Jul 1998 A
5784007 Pepper Jul 1998 A
5784021 Oliva Jul 1998 A
5784521 Nakatani Jul 1998 A
5790403 Nakayama Aug 1998 A
5790973 Blaker Aug 1998 A
5793308 Rosinski Aug 1998 A
5793420 Schmidt Aug 1998 A
5793739 Tanaka Aug 1998 A
5793985 Natarajan Aug 1998 A
5794165 Minowa Aug 1998 A
5797134 McMillan Aug 1998 A
5798458 Monroe Aug 1998 A
5800040 Santo Sep 1998 A
5802545 Coverdill Sep 1998 A
5802727 Blank Sep 1998 A
5805079 Lemelson Sep 1998 A
5813745 Fant Sep 1998 A
5815071 Doyle Sep 1998 A
5815093 Kikinis Sep 1998 A
5819198 Peretz Oct 1998 A
5825284 Dunwoody Oct 1998 A
5825412 Hobson Oct 1998 A
5844505 Van Dec 1998 A
5845733 Wolfsen Dec 1998 A
5867802 Borza Feb 1999 A
5877897 Schofield Mar 1999 A
5896167 Omae Apr 1999 A
5897602 Mizuta Apr 1999 A
5897606 Miura Apr 1999 A
5899956 Chan May 1999 A
5901806 Takahashi May 1999 A
5914748 Parulski Jun 1999 A
5919239 Fraker Jul 1999 A
5926210 Hackett Jul 1999 A
5928291 Jenkins Jul 1999 A
5938321 Bos Aug 1999 A
5946404 Bakshi Aug 1999 A
5948038 Daly et al. Sep 1999 A
5959367 OFarrell Sep 1999 A
5978017 Tino Nov 1999 A
6002326 Turner Dec 1999 A
6006148 Strong Dec 1999 A
6008723 Yassan Dec 1999 A
6008841 Charlson Dec 1999 A
6009370 Minowa Dec 1999 A
6011492 Garesche Jan 2000 A
6028528 Lorenzetti Feb 2000 A
6037860 Zander Mar 2000 A
6037977 Peterson Mar 2000 A
6041410 Hsu Mar 2000 A
6049079 Noordam Apr 2000 A
6057754 Kinoshita May 2000 A
6060989 Gehlot May 2000 A
6064792 Fox May 2000 A
6067488 Tano May 2000 A
6076026 Jambhekar Jun 2000 A
6084870 Wooten Jul 2000 A
6088635 Cox Jul 2000 A
6092008 Bateman Jul 2000 A
6092193 Loomis Jul 2000 A
6100811 Hsu Aug 2000 A
6111254 Eden Aug 2000 A
6118768 Bhatia Sep 2000 A
6122738 Millard Sep 2000 A
6141611 Mackey Oct 2000 A
6144296 Ishida Nov 2000 A
6147598 Murphy Nov 2000 A
6151065 Steed Nov 2000 A
6163338 Johnson Dec 2000 A
6163749 McDonough Dec 2000 A
6167186 Kawasaki Dec 2000 A
6170742 Yacoob Jan 2001 B1
6181373 Coles Jan 2001 B1
6182010 Berstis Jan 2001 B1
6185490 Ferguson Feb 2001 B1
6195605 Tabler Feb 2001 B1
6200139 Clapper Mar 2001 B1
6208919 Barkesseh Mar 2001 B1
6211907 Scaman Apr 2001 B1
6218960 Ishikawa Apr 2001 B1
6246933 Baque Jun 2001 B1
6246934 Otake Jun 2001 B1
6252544 Hoffberg Jun 2001 B1
6253129 Jenkins Jun 2001 B1
6259475 Ramachandran Jul 2001 B1
6263265 Fera Jul 2001 B1
6266588 McClellan Jul 2001 B1
6298290 Abe Oct 2001 B1
6300875 Schafer Oct 2001 B1
6324450 Iwama Nov 2001 B1
6333759 Mazzilli Dec 2001 B1
6337622 Sugano Jan 2002 B1
6349250 Hart Feb 2002 B1
6353734 Wright Mar 2002 B1
6356823 Iannotti Mar 2002 B1
6360147 Lee Mar 2002 B1
6366207 Murphy Apr 2002 B1
6389339 Just May 2002 B1
6389340 Rayner May 2002 B1
6400835 Lemelson Jun 2002 B1
6405112 Rayner Jun 2002 B1
6405132 Breed Jun 2002 B1
6408232 Cannon Jun 2002 B1
6411874 Morgan Jun 2002 B2
6421080 Lambert Jul 2002 B1
6434510 Callaghan Aug 2002 B1
6449540 Rayner Sep 2002 B1
6456321 Ito Sep 2002 B1
6459988 Fan Oct 2002 B1
6470241 Yoshikawa Oct 2002 B2
6472771 Frese Oct 2002 B1
6490513 Fish Dec 2002 B1
6493650 Rodgers Dec 2002 B1
6505106 Lawrence Jan 2003 B1
6507838 Syeda-Mahmood Jan 2003 B1
6508400 Ishifuji Jan 2003 B1
6516256 Hartmann Feb 2003 B1
6518881 Monroe Feb 2003 B2
6525672 Chainer Feb 2003 B2
6529159 Fan Mar 2003 B1
6535804 Chun Mar 2003 B1
6552682 Fan Apr 2003 B1
6556905 Mittelsteadt Apr 2003 B1
6559769 Anthony May 2003 B2
6574538 Sasaki Jun 2003 B2
6575902 Burton Jun 2003 B1
6580373 Ohashi Jun 2003 B1
6580983 Laguer-Diaz Jun 2003 B2
6593848 Atkins, III Jul 2003 B1
6594576 Fan Jul 2003 B2
6611740 Lowrey Aug 2003 B2
6611755 Coffee Aug 2003 B1
6624611 Kirmuss Sep 2003 B2
6629029 Giles Sep 2003 B1
6629030 Klausner Sep 2003 B2
6636791 Okada Oct 2003 B2
6664922 Fan Dec 2003 B1
6665613 Duvall Dec 2003 B2
6679702 Rau Jan 2004 B1
6684137 Takagi Jan 2004 B2
6694483 Nagata Feb 2004 B1
6701234 Vogelsang Mar 2004 B1
6714894 Tobey Mar 2004 B1
6718239 Rayner Apr 2004 B2
6721640 Glenn Apr 2004 B2
6721652 Sanqunetti Apr 2004 B1
6728612 Carver Apr 2004 B1
6732031 Lightner May 2004 B1
6732032 Lowrey May 2004 B1
6735503 Ames May 2004 B2
6737954 Chainer May 2004 B2
6738697 Breed May 2004 B2
6739078 Morley May 2004 B2
6741168 Webb May 2004 B2
6745153 White Jun 2004 B2
6747692 Patel Jun 2004 B2
6748305 Klausner Jun 2004 B1
6760757 Lundberg Jul 2004 B1
6762513 Landgraf Jul 2004 B2
6795017 Puranik Sep 2004 B1
6795111 Mazzilli Sep 2004 B1
6795759 Doyle Sep 2004 B2
6798743 Ma Sep 2004 B1
6804590 Sato Oct 2004 B2
6810362 Adachi Oct 2004 B2
6812831 Ikeda Nov 2004 B2
6819989 Maeda Nov 2004 B2
6831556 Boykin Dec 2004 B1
6832140 Fan Dec 2004 B2
6832141 Skeen Dec 2004 B2
6836712 Nishina Dec 2004 B2
6842762 Raithel Jan 2005 B2
6847873 Li Jan 2005 B1
6850823 Eun Feb 2005 B2
6859695 Klausner Feb 2005 B2
6859705 Rao Feb 2005 B2
6862524 Nagda Mar 2005 B1
6865457 Mittelsteadt Mar 2005 B1
6867733 Sandhu Mar 2005 B2
6873261 Anthony Mar 2005 B2
6882313 Fan Apr 2005 B1
6882912 DiLodovico Apr 2005 B2
6894606 Forbes May 2005 B2
6895248 Akyol May 2005 B1
6898492 de Leon May 2005 B2
6898493 Ehrman May 2005 B2
6919823 Lock Jul 2005 B1
6922566 Puranik Jul 2005 B2
6928348 Lightner Aug 2005 B1
6931309 Phelan Aug 2005 B2
6947817 Diem Sep 2005 B2
6950122 Mirabile Sep 2005 B1
6954223 Miyazawa Oct 2005 B2
6988034 Marlatt Jan 2006 B1
7003289 Kolls Feb 2006 B1
7012632 Freeman Mar 2006 B2
7020548 Saito Mar 2006 B2
7023333 Blanco Apr 2006 B2
7039510 Gumpinger May 2006 B2
7076348 Bucher Jul 2006 B2
7079927 Tano Jul 2006 B1
7082359 Breed Jul 2006 B2
7082382 Rose et al. Jul 2006 B1
7088387 Freeman Aug 2006 B1
7095782 Cohen Aug 2006 B1
7098812 Hirota Aug 2006 B2
7100190 Johnson Aug 2006 B2
7113853 Hecklinger Sep 2006 B2
7117075 Larschan Oct 2006 B1
7119832 Blanco Oct 2006 B2
7138904 Dutu Nov 2006 B1
7155321 Bromley Dec 2006 B2
7177738 Diaz Feb 2007 B2
7209833 Isaji Apr 2007 B2
7239252 Kato Jul 2007 B2
7254482 Kawasaki Aug 2007 B2
7265663 Steele Sep 2007 B2
7266507 Simon Sep 2007 B2
7272179 Siemens Sep 2007 B2
7308341 Schofield Dec 2007 B2
7317974 Luskin Jan 2008 B2
7343306 Bates Mar 2008 B1
7348895 Lagassey Mar 2008 B2
7349027 Endo Mar 2008 B2
7370261 Winarski May 2008 B2
7382933 Dorai Jun 2008 B2
7386376 Basir Jun 2008 B2
7389178 Raz Jun 2008 B2
7457693 Olsen Nov 2008 B2
7471189 Vastad Dec 2008 B2
7471192 Hara Dec 2008 B2
7536457 Miller May 2009 B2
7561054 Raz Jul 2009 B2
7584033 Mittelsteadt Sep 2009 B2
7623754 McKain Nov 2009 B1
7659827 Gunderson Feb 2010 B2
7659835 Jung Feb 2010 B2
7667731 Kreiner Feb 2010 B2
7702442 Takenaka Apr 2010 B2
7725216 Kim May 2010 B2
7768548 Silvernail Aug 2010 B2
7769499 McQuade Aug 2010 B2
7783956 Ko Aug 2010 B2
7804426 Etcheson Sep 2010 B2
7821421 Tamir Oct 2010 B2
7853376 Peng Dec 2010 B2
7893958 DAgostino Feb 2011 B1
7940250 Forstall May 2011 B2
7941258 Mittelsteadt May 2011 B1
7974748 Goerick Jul 2011 B2
8054168 McCormick Nov 2011 B2
8068979 Breed Nov 2011 B2
8090598 Bauer Jan 2012 B2
8113844 Huang Feb 2012 B2
8139820 Plante Mar 2012 B2
8140265 Grush Mar 2012 B2
8140358 Ling Mar 2012 B1
8152198 Breed Apr 2012 B2
8239092 Plante Aug 2012 B2
8269617 Cook Sep 2012 B2
8311858 Everett Nov 2012 B2
8314708 Gunderson Nov 2012 B2
8321066 Becker Nov 2012 B2
8373567 Denson Feb 2013 B2
8417562 Siemens Apr 2013 B1
8442690 Goldstein May 2013 B2
8471701 Yariv Jun 2013 B2
8508353 Cook Aug 2013 B2
8538696 Cassanova Sep 2013 B1
8538785 Coleman Sep 2013 B2
8564426 Cook Oct 2013 B2
8564446 Gunderson Oct 2013 B2
8571755 Plante Oct 2013 B2
8577703 McClellan Nov 2013 B2
8606492 Botnen Dec 2013 B1
8635557 Geise Jan 2014 B2
8676428 Richardson Mar 2014 B2
8744642 Nemat-Nasser Jun 2014 B2
8775067 Cho Jul 2014 B2
8803695 Denson Aug 2014 B2
8805110 Rhoads Aug 2014 B2
8849501 Cook Sep 2014 B2
8855847 Uehara Oct 2014 B2
8868288 Plante Oct 2014 B2
8880279 Plante Nov 2014 B2
8892310 Palmer Nov 2014 B1
8989959 Plante Mar 2015 B2
8996234 Tamari Mar 2015 B1
8996240 Plante Mar 2015 B2
9047721 Botnen Jun 2015 B1
9183679 Plante Nov 2015 B2
9201842 Plante Dec 2015 B2
9208129 Plante Dec 2015 B2
9226004 Plante Dec 2015 B1
9240079 Lambert Jan 2016 B2
20010005217 Hamilton Jun 2001 A1
20010005804 Rayner Jun 2001 A1
20010018628 Jenkins Aug 2001 A1
20010020204 Runyon Sep 2001 A1
20010052730 Baur Dec 2001 A1
20020019689 Harrison Feb 2002 A1
20020027502 Mayor Mar 2002 A1
20020029109 Wong Mar 2002 A1
20020035422 Sasaki Mar 2002 A1
20020044225 Rakib Apr 2002 A1
20020059453 Eriksson May 2002 A1
20020061758 Zarlengo May 2002 A1
20020067076 Talbot Jun 2002 A1
20020087240 Raithel Jul 2002 A1
20020091473 Gardner Jul 2002 A1
20020105438 Forbes Aug 2002 A1
20020107619 Klausner Aug 2002 A1
20020111725 Burge Aug 2002 A1
20020111756 Modgil Aug 2002 A1
20020118206 Knittel Aug 2002 A1
20020120374 Douros Aug 2002 A1
20020135679 Scaman Sep 2002 A1
20020138587 Koehler Sep 2002 A1
20020163532 Thomas Nov 2002 A1
20020169529 Kim Nov 2002 A1
20020169530 Laguer-Diaz Nov 2002 A1
20020183905 Maeda Dec 2002 A1
20030016753 Kim Jan 2003 A1
20030028298 Macky Feb 2003 A1
20030053433 Chun Mar 2003 A1
20030055557 Dutta Mar 2003 A1
20030065805 Barnes Apr 2003 A1
20030067541 Joao Apr 2003 A1
20030079041 Parrella Apr 2003 A1
20030080713 Kirmuss May 2003 A1
20030080878 Kirmuss May 2003 A1
20030081121 Kirmuss May 2003 A1
20030081122 Kirmuss May 2003 A1
20030081127 Kirmuss May 2003 A1
20030081128 Kirmuss May 2003 A1
20030081934 Kirmuss May 2003 A1
20030081935 Kirmuss May 2003 A1
20030095688 Kirmuss May 2003 A1
20030112133 Webb Jun 2003 A1
20030125854 Kawasaki Jul 2003 A1
20030144775 Klausner Jul 2003 A1
20030152145 Kawakita Aug 2003 A1
20030154009 Basir Aug 2003 A1
20030158638 Yakes Aug 2003 A1
20030177187 Levine Sep 2003 A1
20030187704 Hashiguchi Oct 2003 A1
20030191568 Breed Oct 2003 A1
20030195678 Betters et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030214585 Bakewell Nov 2003 A1
20030220835 Barnes Nov 2003 A1
20030222880 Waterman Dec 2003 A1
20040008255 Lewellen Jan 2004 A1
20040033058 Reich Feb 2004 A1
20040039503 Doyle Feb 2004 A1
20040039504 Coffee Feb 2004 A1
20040044452 Bauer Mar 2004 A1
20040044592 Ubik Mar 2004 A1
20040054444 Abeska Mar 2004 A1
20040054513 Laird Mar 2004 A1
20040054689 Salmonsen Mar 2004 A1
20040064245 Knockeart Apr 2004 A1
20040070926 Boykin Apr 2004 A1
20040083041 Skeen Apr 2004 A1
20040088090 Wee May 2004 A1
20040103008 Wahlbin May 2004 A1
20040103010 Wahlbin May 2004 A1
20040104842 Drury Jun 2004 A1
20040111189 Miyazawa Jun 2004 A1
20040138794 Saito Jul 2004 A1
20040145457 Schofield et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040153244 Kellum Aug 2004 A1
20040153362 Bauer Aug 2004 A1
20040167689 Bromley Aug 2004 A1
20040179600 Wells Sep 2004 A1
20040181326 Adams Sep 2004 A1
20040184548 Kerbiriou Sep 2004 A1
20040203903 Wilson Oct 2004 A1
20040209594 Naboulsi Oct 2004 A1
20040210353 Rice Oct 2004 A1
20040230345 Tzamaloukas Nov 2004 A1
20040230370 Tzamaloukas Nov 2004 A1
20040230373 Tzamaloukas Nov 2004 A1
20040230374 Tzamaloukas Nov 2004 A1
20040233284 Lesesky Nov 2004 A1
20040236474 Chowdhary Nov 2004 A1
20040243285 Gounder Dec 2004 A1
20040243308 Irish Dec 2004 A1
20040243668 Harjanto Dec 2004 A1
20040254689 Blazic Dec 2004 A1
20040254698 Hubbard Dec 2004 A1
20050021199 Zimmerman Jan 2005 A1
20050043869 Funkhouser Feb 2005 A1
20050060070 Kapolka Mar 2005 A1
20050060071 Winner Mar 2005 A1
20050065682 Kapadia Mar 2005 A1
20050065716 Timko Mar 2005 A1
20050073585 Ettinger Apr 2005 A1
20050078423 Kim Apr 2005 A1
20050088291 Blanco Apr 2005 A1
20050099498 Lao May 2005 A1
20050100329 Lao May 2005 A1
20050102074 Kolls May 2005 A1
20050125117 Breed Jun 2005 A1
20050131585 Luskin Jun 2005 A1
20050131595 Luskin Jun 2005 A1
20050131597 Raz Jun 2005 A1
20050136949 Barnes Jun 2005 A1
20050137757 Phelan Jun 2005 A1
20050137796 Gumpinger Jun 2005 A1
20050146458 Carmichael Jul 2005 A1
20050149238 Stefani Jul 2005 A1
20050149259 Cherveny Jul 2005 A1
20050159964 Sonnenrein Jul 2005 A1
20050166258 Vasilevsky Jul 2005 A1
20050171692 Hamblen Aug 2005 A1
20050174217 Basir Aug 2005 A1
20050182538 Phelan Aug 2005 A1
20050182824 Cotte Aug 2005 A1
20050185052 Raisinghani Aug 2005 A1
20050185936 Lao Aug 2005 A9
20050192749 Flann Sep 2005 A1
20050197748 Hoist Sep 2005 A1
20050200714 Marchese Sep 2005 A1
20050203683 Olsen Sep 2005 A1
20050206741 Raber Sep 2005 A1
20050209776 Ogino Sep 2005 A1
20050212920 Evans Sep 2005 A1
20050216144 Baldassa Sep 2005 A1
20050228560 Doherty Oct 2005 A1
20050233805 Okajima Oct 2005 A1
20050251304 Cancellara Nov 2005 A1
20050256681 Brinton Nov 2005 A1
20050258942 Manasseh Nov 2005 A1
20050264691 Endo Dec 2005 A1
20050283284 Grenier Dec 2005 A1
20060001671 Kamijo Jan 2006 A1
20060007151 Ram Jan 2006 A1
20060011399 Brockway Jan 2006 A1
20060015233 Olsen Jan 2006 A1
20060022842 Zoladek Feb 2006 A1
20060025897 Shostak Feb 2006 A1
20060030986 Peng Feb 2006 A1
20060040239 Cummins Feb 2006 A1
20060047380 Welch Mar 2006 A1
20060053038 Warren Mar 2006 A1
20060055521 Blanco Mar 2006 A1
20060057543 Roald Mar 2006 A1
20060058950 Kato Mar 2006 A1
20060072792 Toda Apr 2006 A1
20060078853 Lanktree Apr 2006 A1
20060082438 Bazakos Apr 2006 A1
20060092043 Lagassey May 2006 A1
20060095175 Dewaal May 2006 A1
20060095199 Lagassey May 2006 A1
20060095349 Morgan May 2006 A1
20060103127 Lie May 2006 A1
20060106514 Liebl May 2006 A1
20060111817 Phelan May 2006 A1
20060122749 Phelan Jun 2006 A1
20060129578 Kim Jun 2006 A1
20060142913 Coffee Jun 2006 A1
20060143435 Kwon Jun 2006 A1
20060147187 Takemoto Jul 2006 A1
20060161960 Benoit Jul 2006 A1
20060168271 Pabari Jul 2006 A1
20060178793 Hecklinger Aug 2006 A1
20060180647 Hansen Aug 2006 A1
20060192658 Yamamura Aug 2006 A1
20060200008 Moore-Ede Sep 2006 A1
20060200305 Sheha Sep 2006 A1
20060204059 Ido Sep 2006 A1
20060209090 Kelly et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060209840 Paatela Sep 2006 A1
20060212195 Veith Sep 2006 A1
20060215884 Ota Sep 2006 A1
20060226344 Werth Oct 2006 A1
20060229780 Underdahl Oct 2006 A1
20060242680 Johnson Oct 2006 A1
20060247833 Malhotra Nov 2006 A1
20060253307 Warren Nov 2006 A1
20060259218 Wu Nov 2006 A1
20060261931 Cheng Nov 2006 A1
20070001831 Raz Jan 2007 A1
20070005404 Raz Jan 2007 A1
20070027583 Tamir Feb 2007 A1
20070027726 Warren Feb 2007 A1
20070035632 Silvernail Feb 2007 A1
20070043487 Krzystofczyk Feb 2007 A1
20070120948 Fujioka May 2007 A1
20070124332 Ballesty May 2007 A1
20070127833 Singh Jun 2007 A1
20070132773 Plante Jun 2007 A1
20070135979 Plante Jun 2007 A1
20070135980 Plante Jun 2007 A1
20070136078 Plante Jun 2007 A1
20070142986 Alaous Jun 2007 A1
20070143499 Chang Jun 2007 A1
20070150138 Plante Jun 2007 A1
20070150140 Seymour Jun 2007 A1
20070173994 Kubo Jul 2007 A1
20070179691 Grenn Aug 2007 A1
20070183635 Weidhaas Aug 2007 A1
20070208494 Chapman Sep 2007 A1
20070216521 Guensler Sep 2007 A1
20070219685 Plante Sep 2007 A1
20070219686 Plante Sep 2007 A1
20070241874 Okpysh Oct 2007 A1
20070244614 Nathanson Oct 2007 A1
20070257781 Denson Nov 2007 A1
20070257782 Etcheson Nov 2007 A1
20070257804 Gunderson Nov 2007 A1
20070257815 Gunderson Nov 2007 A1
20070260677 DeMarco Nov 2007 A1
20070263984 Sterner Nov 2007 A1
20070268158 Gunderson Nov 2007 A1
20070271105 Gunderson Nov 2007 A1
20070273480 Burkman Nov 2007 A1
20070279214 Buehler Dec 2007 A1
20070299612 Kimura Dec 2007 A1
20080035108 Ancimer Feb 2008 A1
20080059019 Delia Mar 2008 A1
20080071827 Hengel Mar 2008 A1
20080111666 Plante May 2008 A1
20080122603 Plante May 2008 A1
20080143834 Comeau Jun 2008 A1
20080147267 Plante et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080157510 Breed Jul 2008 A1
20080167775 Kuttenberger Jul 2008 A1
20080169914 Albertson Jul 2008 A1
20080177436 Fortson Jul 2008 A1
20080195261 Breed Aug 2008 A1
20080204556 deMiranda Aug 2008 A1
20080211779 Pryor Sep 2008 A1
20080234920 Nurminen Sep 2008 A1
20080243389 Inoue Oct 2008 A1
20080252412 Larsson Oct 2008 A1
20080252485 Lagassey Oct 2008 A1
20080252487 McClellan Oct 2008 A1
20080269978 Shirole Oct 2008 A1
20080281485 Plante Nov 2008 A1
20080309762 Howard et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080319604 Follmer Dec 2008 A1
20090009321 McClellan Jan 2009 A1
20090043500 Satoh Feb 2009 A1
20090043971 Kim Feb 2009 A1
20090051510 Follmer Feb 2009 A1
20090138191 Engelhard May 2009 A1
20090157255 Plante Jun 2009 A1
20090216775 Ratliff et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090224869 Baker Sep 2009 A1
20090290848 Brown Nov 2009 A1
20090299622 Denaro Dec 2009 A1
20090312998 Berckmans Dec 2009 A1
20090326796 Prokhorov Dec 2009 A1
20090327856 Mouilleseaux Dec 2009 A1
20100030423 Nathanson Feb 2010 A1
20100045451 Periwal Feb 2010 A1
20100049516 Talwar Feb 2010 A1
20100054709 Misawa Mar 2010 A1
20100057342 Muramatsu Mar 2010 A1
20100063672 Anderson Mar 2010 A1
20100063680 Tolstedt Mar 2010 A1
20100063850 Daniel Mar 2010 A1
20100070175 Soulchin Mar 2010 A1
20100076621 Kubotani Mar 2010 A1
20100085193 Boss Apr 2010 A1
20100085430 Kreiner Apr 2010 A1
20100087984 Joseph Apr 2010 A1
20100100315 Davidson Apr 2010 A1
20100103165 Lee Apr 2010 A1
20100104199 Zhang Apr 2010 A1
20100153146 Angell Jun 2010 A1
20100157061 Katsman Jun 2010 A1
20100191411 Cook Jul 2010 A1
20100201875 Rood Aug 2010 A1
20100220892 Kawakubo Sep 2010 A1
20100250020 Lee Sep 2010 A1
20100250021 Cook Sep 2010 A1
20100250060 Maeda Sep 2010 A1
20100250116 Yamaguchi Sep 2010 A1
20100253918 Seder Oct 2010 A1
20100268415 Ishikawa Oct 2010 A1
20100283633 Becker Nov 2010 A1
20100312464 Fitzgerald Dec 2010 A1
20110035139 Konlditslotis Feb 2011 A1
20110043624 Haug Feb 2011 A1
20110060496 Nielsen Mar 2011 A1
20110077028 Wilkes Mar 2011 A1
20110091079 Yu-Song Apr 2011 A1
20110093159 Boling Apr 2011 A1
20110112995 Chang May 2011 A1
20110121960 Tsai May 2011 A1
20110125365 Larschan May 2011 A1
20110130916 Mayer Jun 2011 A1
20110140884 Santiago Jun 2011 A1
20110153367 Amigo Jun 2011 A1
20110161116 Peak Jun 2011 A1
20110173015 Chapman Jul 2011 A1
20110208428 Matsubara Aug 2011 A1
20110213628 Peak Sep 2011 A1
20110224891 Iwuchukwu Sep 2011 A1
20110251752 DeLarocheliere Oct 2011 A1
20110254676 Marumoto Oct 2011 A1
20110257882 McBurney Oct 2011 A1
20110273568 Lagassey Nov 2011 A1
20110283223 Vaittinen et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110304446 Basson Dec 2011 A1
20120021386 Anderson Jan 2012 A1
20120035788 Trepagnier Feb 2012 A1
20120041675 Juliver Feb 2012 A1
20120046803 Inou Feb 2012 A1
20120071140 Oesterling Mar 2012 A1
20120078063 Moore-Ede Mar 2012 A1
20120081567 Cote Apr 2012 A1
20120100509 Gunderson Apr 2012 A1
20120109447 Yousefi May 2012 A1
20120123806 Schumann May 2012 A1
20120134547 Jung May 2012 A1
20120150436 Rossano Jun 2012 A1
20120176234 Taneyhill Jul 2012 A1
20120190001 Knight Jul 2012 A1
20120210252 Fedoseyeva Aug 2012 A1
20120277950 Plante Nov 2012 A1
20120283895 Noda Nov 2012 A1
20130004138 Kilar Jan 2013 A1
20130006469 Green Jan 2013 A1
20130021148 Cook Jan 2013 A1
20130030660 Fujimoto Jan 2013 A1
20130073114 Nemat-Nasser Mar 2013 A1
20130096731 Tamari Apr 2013 A1
20130151980 Lee Jun 2013 A1
20130197774 Denson Aug 2013 A1
20130274950 Richardson Oct 2013 A1
20130317711 Plante Nov 2013 A1
20130332004 Gompert et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130345927 Cook Dec 2013 A1
20140025225 Armitage Jan 2014 A1
20140025254 Plante Jan 2014 A1
20140046550 Palmer Feb 2014 A1
20140047371 Palmer Feb 2014 A1
20140098228 Plante Apr 2014 A1
20140152828 Plante Jun 2014 A1
20140226010 Molin et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140279707 Joshua Sep 2014 A1
20140280204 Avery Sep 2014 A1
20140300739 Mimar Oct 2014 A1
20140309849 Ricci Oct 2014 A1
20140335902 Guba Nov 2014 A1
20150035665 Plante Feb 2015 A1
20150057836 Plante Feb 2015 A1
20150105934 Palmer Apr 2015 A1
20150134226 Palmer May 2015 A1
20150135240 Shibuya May 2015 A1
20150189042 Sun Jul 2015 A1
20150222449 Salinger Aug 2015 A1
20150317846 Plante Nov 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (64)
Number Date Country
2469728 Dec 2005 CA
2469728 Dec 2005 CA
2692415 Aug 2011 CA
2692415 Aug 2011 CA
4416991 Nov 1995 DE
20311262 Sep 2003 DE
20311262UU1 Sep 2003 DE
202005008238 Sep 2005 DE
102004004669 Dec 2005 DE
102004004669 Dec 2005 DE
0708427 Apr 1996 EP
0840270 May 1998 EP
0848270 May 1998 EP
1170697 Jan 2002 EP
1324274 Jul 2003 EP
1355278 Oct 2003 EP
1427165 Jun 2004 EP
1818873 Aug 2007 EP
2104075 Sep 2009 EP
2268608 Jan 1994 GB
2402530 Dec 2004 GB
2402530 Dec 2004 GB
2451485 Feb 2009 GB
2447184 Jun 2011 GB
2446994 Aug 2011 GB
58085110 May 1983 JP
S5885110 May 1983 JP
62091092 Apr 1987 JP
S6291092 Apr 1987 JP
S62166135 Jul 1987 JP
02056197 Feb 1990 JP
H0256197 Feb 1990 JP
H04257189 Sep 1992 JP
H05137144 Jun 1993 JP
5294188 Nov 1993 JP
H08124069 May 1996 JP
H09163357 Jun 1997 JP
H09272399 Oct 1997 JP
10076880 Mar 1998 JP
H1076880 Mar 1998 JP
2002191017 Jul 2002 JP
2002191017 Jul 2002 JP
1000588169 Dec 2000 KR
8809023 Nov 1988 WO
9005076 May 1990 WO
9427844 Dec 1994 WO
9600957 Jan 1996 WO
9701246 Jan 1997 WO
9726750 Jul 1997 WO
9937503 Jul 1999 WO
9940545 Aug 1999 WO
9962741 Dec 1999 WO
0007150 Feb 2000 WO
0028410 May 2000 WO
0048033 Aug 2000 WO
0077620 Dec 2000 WO
0123214 Apr 2001 WO
0125054 Apr 2001 WO
0146710 Jun 2001 WO
03045514 Jun 2003 WO
2006022824 Mar 2006 WO
2006022824 Mar 2006 WO
2007067767 Jun 2007 WO
2011055743 May 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (196)
Entry
Preliminary Claim Construction and Identification of Extrinsic Evidence of Defendant/Counterclaimant SmartDriveSystems, Inc.' in DriveCam, Inc. v. SmartDrive Systems, Inc., Case No. 3:11-CV-00997-H (RBB), for the Southern District of California. Nov. 8, 2011. (13 pgs.).
DriveCam's Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Preliminary Infringement Contentions in DriveCam, Inc. v. SmartDrive Systems, Inc., Case No. 3:11-CV-00997-H-RBB, for the Southern District of California. Aug. 19, 2011. (6 pgs.).
Supplement to DriveCam's Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Preliminary Infringement Contentions' in DriveCam, Inc. v. SmartDrive Systems, Inc., Case No. 3:11-CV-00997-H-RBB, for the Southern District of California. Oct. 14, 2011. (7 pgs.).
DriveCam, Inc.'s Infringement Contentions Exhibit C, U.S. Pat. No. 7,804,426. Aug. 19, 2011. (47 pgs.).
DriveCam, Inc.'s Infringement Contentions Exhibit B, U.S. Pat. No. 7,659,827. Aug. 19, 2011. (29 pgs.).
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/957,810, mailed Jun. 8, 2015, 10 pages.
“DriveCam, Inc's Disclosure of Proposed Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence Pursuant to Patent L.R. 4.1.a & 4.1.b” Disclosure and Extrinsic Evidence in DriveCam, Inc. v. SmartDrive Systems, Inc., Case No. 3:11-CV-00997-H-RBB, for the Southern District of California. Nov. 8, 2011.
“DriveCam Driving Feedback System”, DriveCam brochure, Jun. 12, 2001, Document #6600128.
“DriveCam Driving Feedback System” DriveCam brochure, Mar. 15, 2004.
“DriveCam Passenger Transportation Module”, DriveCam brochure, Oct. 26, 2001.
“DriveCam Video Event Data Recorder”, DriveCam brochure, Nov. 6, 2002, Document #6600127.
“Responsive Claim Construction and Identification of Extrinsic Evidence of Defendani/Counterclaimant SmartDrive Systems, Inc.” Claim Construction and and Extrinsic Evidence in DriveCam, Inc. v. SmartDrive Systems, Inc., Case No. 3:11-CV-00997-H (RBB), for the Southern District of California. Nov. 15, 2011.
“Sonic MyDVD 4.0: Tutorial: Trimming video segments”. Tutorial for software bundled with Adaptec VideoOh! DVD USB 2.0 Edition, 2003.
“User's Manual for DriveCam Video Systems' HindSight 20/20 Software Version 4.0” DriveCam Manual, San Diego, 2003, Document #6600141-1.
Canadian Office Action issued in Application No. 2,632,685 dated Jan. 30, 2015; 5 pages.
Dan Maher, “DriveCam Taking Risk Out of Driving”, DriveCam brochure folder, Jun. 6, 2005.
Del Lisk, “DriveCam Training Seminar” Handout, 2004.
European Examination Report issued in EP 07772812.9 on Jan. 22, 2015; 5 pages.
Jean (DriveCam vendor) “DriveCam Driving Feedback System”, DriveCam brochure, Nov. 6, 2002, Document #6600128-1.
Notice of Allowance Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/036,299, mailed Mar. 20, 2015, xx pages.
Notice of Allowance Application for U.S. Appl. No. 11/566,424, mailed Feb. 26, 2010, 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/377,164, mailed Dec. 3, 2014, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/377,164, mailed Feb. 13, 2015, 2 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/377,164, mailed Feb. 25, 2014, 2 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/377,164, mailed Nov. 18, 2013, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/377,167, mailed Apr. 1, 2015, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/800,876, mailed Apr. 19, 2012, 8 pages.
USPTO Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/296,906, mailed Aug. 8, 2012, 15 pages.
USPTO Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/096,591, mailed Dec. 5, 2014, 23 pages.
USPTO Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/096,591, mailed Jul. 18, 2012, 15 pages.
USPTO Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/096,591, mailed Nov. 7, 2013, 14 pages.
USPTO Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/957,810, mailed Jun. 27, 2014, 22 pages.
USPTO Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/036,299, mailed Feb. 24, 2015, 9 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/296,906, mailed Apr. 8, 2014, 19 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/296,906, mailed Jun. 12, 2012, 13 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/377,164, mailed Apr. 7, 2014, 7 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/377,164, mailed Aug. 18, 2014, 5 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/377,164, mailed Sep. 10, 2012, 10 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/377,167, mailed Jun. 27, 2013, 11 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/096,591, mailed Jun. 14, 2011, 8 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/096,591, mailed Mar. 27, 2013, 16 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/957,810, mailed Apr. 17, 2015, 6 pages.
USPTO Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/957,810, mailed Nov. 27, 2013, 18 pages.
Adaptec published and sold its VideoOh! DVD software USB 2.0 Edition in at least Jan. 24, 2003.
Ambulance Companies Use Video Technology to Improve Driving Behavior, Ambulance Industry Journal, Spring 2003.
Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement, Trade Secret Misappropriation, Unfair Competition and Conversion in DriveCam, Inc. v. SmartDrive Systems, Inc., Case No. 3:11-CV-00997-H-RBB, for the Southern District of California, Document 34, filed Oct. 20, 2011, pp. 1-15.
Amendment filed Dec. 23, 2009 during prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 11/566,424.
Answer to Amended Complaint; Counterclaims; and Demand for Jury Trial in DriveCam, Inc. v. SmartDrive Systems, Inc., Case No. 3:11-CV-00997 H (RBB), for the Southern District of California, Document 47, filed Dec. 13, 2011, pp. 1-15.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/296,906, filed Dec. 8, 2005, File History.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/297,669, filed Dec. 8, 2005, File History.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/297,889, filed Dec. 8, 2005, File History.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/298,069, filed Dec. 9, 2005, File History.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/299,028, filed Dec. 9, 2005, File History.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/593,659, filed Nov. 7, 2006, File History.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/593,682, filed Nov. 7, 2006, File History.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/593,882, filed Nov. 7, 2006, File History.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,015, filed Nov. 9, 2006, File History.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/637,754, filed Dec. 13, 2006, File History.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/637,755, filed Dec. 13, 2006, File History.
Bill, ‘DriveCam—FAQ’, Dec. 12, 2003.
Bill Siuru, ‘DriveCam Could Save You Big Bucks’, Land Line Magazine, May-Jun. 2000.
Chris Woodyard, ‘Shuttles save with DriveCam’, Dec. 9, 2003.
Dan Carr, Flash Video Template: Video Presentation with Navigation, Jan. 16, 2006, http://www.adobe.com/devnet/fiash/articles/vidtemplate—mediapreso—flash8.html.
David Cullen, ‘Getting a real eyeful’, Fleet Owner Magazine, Feb. 2002.
David Maher, ‘DriveCam Brochure Folder’, Jun. 6, 2005.
David Maher, “DriveCam Brochure Folder”, Jun. 8, 2005.
David Vogeleer et al., Macromedia Flash Professional 8UNLEASHED (Sams Oct. 12, 2005).
Del Lisk, ‘DriveCam Training Handout Ver4’, Feb. 3, 2005.
Drivecam, Inc., User's Manual for Drivecam Video Systems' Hindsight 20/20 Software Version 4.0 (2003).
DriveCam, Inc.'s Infringement Contentions Exhibit A, U.S. Pat. No. 6,389,340, Document 34.1, Oct. 20, 2011.
DriveCam, Inc.'s Infringement Contentions Exhibit B, U.S. Pat. No. 7,659,827. Aug. 19, 2011.
DriveCam, Inc.'s Infringement Contentions Exhibit B, U.S. Pat. No. 7,804,426, Document 34.2, Oct. 20, 2011.
DriveCam, Inc.'s Infringement Contentions Exhibit C, U.S. Pat. No. 7,659,827, Document 34.3, Oct. 20, 2011.
DriveCam, Inc.'s Infringement Contentions Exhibit C, U.S. Pat. No. 7,804,426. Aug. 19, 2011.
DriveCam, Inc.'s Infringement Contentions Exhibit D, Document 34.4, Oct. 20, 2011.
DriveCam—Illuminator Data Sheet, Oct. 2, 2004.
Drivecam.com as retrieved by the Internet Wayback Machine as of Mar. 5, 2005.
DriveCam's Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Preliminary Infringement Contentions in DriveCam, Inc. v. SmartDrive Systems, Inc., Case No. 3:11-CV-00997-H-RBB, for the Southern District of California. Aug. 19, 2011.
DriveCam Driving Feedback System, Mar. 15, 2004.
DriveCam Extrinsic Evidence with Patent LR 4.1 .a Disclosures, Nov. 3, 2011.
DriveCam Extrinsic Evidence with Patent LR 4.1 .a Disclosures, Nov. 8, 2011.
Driver Feedback System, Jun. 12, 2001.
First Amended Answer to Amended Complaint and First Amended Counterclaims; and Demand for Jury Trial in DriveCam, Inc. v. SmartDrive Systems, Inc., Case No. 3:11-CV-00997 H (RBB), for the Southern District of California, Document 53, filed Dec. 20, 2011, pp. 1-48.
First Amended Answer to Amended Complaint and First Amended Counterclaims; and Demand for Jury Trial in DriveCam, Inc. v. SmartDrive Systems, Inc., Case No. 3:11-CV-00997 H (RBB), for the Southern District of California, Document 55, filed Jan. 1, 2012, pp. 86-103.
First Amended Answer to Amended Complaint and First Amended Counterclaims; and Demand for Jury Trial in DriveCam, Inc. v. SmartDrive Systems, Inc., Case No. 3:11-CV-00997 H (RBB), for the Southern District of California, Document 55, filed Jan. 3, 2012, pp. 86-103.
First Amended Answer to Amended Complaint and First Amended Counterclaims; and Demand for Jury Trial in DriveCam, Inc. v. SmartDrive Systems, Inc., Case No. 3:11 -CV-00997 H (RBB), for the Southern District of California, Exhibit A, Document 55, filed Jan. 3, 2012, pp. 49-103.
Franke, U., et al., Autonomous Driving Goes Downtown, IEEE Intelligent Systems, 13(6):40-48 (1988); Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/5254.736001.
Gallagher, B., et al., Wireless Communications for Vehicle Safety: Radio Link Performance and Wireless Connectivity Methods, Vehicular Technology Magazine, IEEE, 1(4):4- 24 (2006); Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/MVT.2006.343641.
Gandhi, T., et al., Pedestrian Protection Systems: Issues, Survey, and Challenges, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 8(3):413-430 (2007); Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TITS.2007.903444.
Gary and Sophia Rayner, Final Report for Innovations Deserving Exploratory Analysis (Idea) Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Programs' Project 84, I-Witness Black Box Recorder, San Diego, CA. Nov. 2001.
GE published its VCR User's Guide for Model VG4255 in 1995.
Glenn Oster, ‘Hindsight 20/20 v4.0 Software Installation’, 1 of 2, Jun. 20, 2003.
Glenn Oster, ‘HindSight 20/20 v4.0 Software Installation’, 2 of 2, Jun. 20, 2003.
Glenn Oster, ‘Illuminator Installation’, Oct. 3, 2004.
Hans Fantel, Video; Search Methods Make a Difference in Picking VCR's, NY Times, Aug. 13, 1989.
I/O Port Racing Supplies' website discloses using Traqmate's Data Acquisition with Video Overlay system in conjunction with professional driver coaching sessions (available at http://www.ioportracing.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=CTGY&Categorys- ub.--Code=coaching)., printed from site on Jan. 11, 2012.
Interior Camera Data Sheet, Oct. 26, 2001.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US07/68325 on Feb. 27, 2008.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US07/68328 on Oct. 15, 2007.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US07/68329 on Mar. 3, 2008.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US07/68332 on Mar. 3, 2008.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US07/68334 on Mar. 5, 2008.
International Search Report for PCT/US2006/47055, Mailed Mar. 20, 2008 (2 pages).
International Search Report issued in PCT/US2006/47042 mailed Feb. 25, 2008.
J. Gallagher, ‘Lancer Recommends Tech Tool’, Insurance and Technology Magazine, Feb. 2002.
Jean (DriveCam vendor), ‘DC Data Sheet’, Nov. 6, 2002.
Jean (DriveCam vendor), ‘DriveCam brochure’, Nov. 6, 2002.
Jean (DriveCam vendor), ‘Feedback Data Sheet’, Nov. 6, 2002.
Jean (DriveCam vendor), ‘Hindsight 20-20 Data Sheet’, Nov. 4, 2002.
Jessyca Wallace, ‘Analyzing and Processing DriveCam Recorded Events’, Oct. 6, 2003.
Jessyca Wallace, ‘Overview of the DriveCam Program’, Dec. 15, 2005.
Jessyca Wallace, ‘The DriveCam Driver Feedback System’, Apr. 6, 2004.
Joint Claim Construction Chart, U.S. Pat. No. 6,389,340, ‘Vehicle Data Recorder’ for Case No. 3:11-CV-00997-H-RBB, Document 43-1, filed Dec. 1, 2011, pp. 1-33.
Joint Claim Construction Chart in DriveCam, Inc. v. SmartDrive Systems, Inc., Case No. 11-CV-0997-H (RBB), for the Southern District of California, Document 43, filed Dec. 1, 2011, pp. 1-2.
Joint Claim Construction Worksheet, U.S. Pat. No. 6,389,340, ‘Vehicle Data Reporter’ for Case No. 3:11-CV-00997-H-RBB, Document 44-1, filed Dec. 1, 2011, pp. 1-10.
Joint Claim Construction Worksheet, U.S. Pat. No. 6,389,340, “Vehicle Data Reporter” for Case No. 3:11-CV-00997-H-RBB, Document 44-1, filed Dec. 1, 2011, pp. 1-10.
Joint Claim Construction Worksheet in DriveCam, Inc. v. SmartDrive Systems, Inc., Case No. 3:11-CV-00997 H (RBB), for the Southern District of California, Document 44, filed Dec. 1, 2011, pp. 1-2.
Joint Motion for Leave to Supplement Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Preliminary Infringement Contentions in DriveCam, Inc. v. SmartDrive Systems, Inc., Case No. 3:11-cv-00997-H-RBB, Document 29, filed Oct. 12, 2011, pp. 1-7.
Julie Stevens, ‘DriveCam Services’, Nov. 15, 2004.
Julie Stevens, ‘Program Support Roll-Out & Monitoring’, Jul. 13, 2004.
Jung, Sang-Hack, et al., Egomotion Estimation in Monocular Infra-red Image Sequence for Night Vision Applications, IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV '07), Feb. 2007, pp. 8-8; Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/WACV.2007.20.
JVC Company of America, JVC Video Cassette Recorder HR-IP820U Instructions (1996).
Kamijo, S., et al., A Real-Time Traffic Monitoring System by Stochastic Model Combination, IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 4:3275-3281 (2003).
Kamijo, S., et al., An Incident Detection System Based on Semantic Hierarchy, Proceedings of the 7th International IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference, Oct. 3-6, 2004, pp. 853-858; Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/ITS0.2004.1399015.
Karen, ‘Downloading Options to HindSight 20120’, Aug. 6, 2002.
Karen, ‘Managers Guide to the DriveCam Driving Feedback System’, Jul. 30, 2002.
Kathy Latus (Latus Design), ‘Case Study—Cloud 9 Shuttle’, Sep. 23, 2005.
Kathy Latus (Latus Design), ‘Case Study—Lloyd Pest Control’, Jul. 19, 2005.
Kathy Latus (Latus Design), ‘Case Study13 Time Warner Cable’, Sep. 23, 2005.
Ki, Yong-Kul, et al., A Traffic Accident Detection Model using Metadala Registry, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications; Aug. 9-11, 2006 pp. 255-259 Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/SERA.2006.8.
Kitchin, Charles. “Understanding accelerometer scale factor and offset adjustments.” Analog Devices (1995).
Lin, Chin-Teng et al., EEG-based drowsiness estimation for safety driving using independent component analysis; IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems-I: Regular Papers, 52(12):2726-2738 (2005); Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TCSI.2005.857555.
Lisa Mckenna, ‘A Fly on the Windshield?’, Pest Control Technology Magazine, Apr. 2003.
Miller, D.P., Evaluation of Vision Systems for Teleoperated Land Vehicles. Control Systems Magazine, IEEE, 8(3):37-41 (1988); Digital Identifier 10.1109/37.475.
Munder, S., et al., Pedestrian Detection and Tracking Using a Mixture of View-Based Shape-Texture Models, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 9(2):333-343 (2008); Digital Identifier 10.1109/TITS.2008.922943.
Panasonic Corporation, Video Cassette Recorder (VCR) Operating Instructions for Models No. PV-V4020/PV-V4520.
Passenger Transportation Mode Brochure, May 2, 2005.
Patent Abstracts of Japan vol. 007, No. 180 (P-215), Aug. 9, 1983 & JP 58 085110 A (Mitsuhisa Ichikawa), May 21, 1983.
Patent Abstracts of Japan vol. 011, No. 292 (E-543), Sep. 19, 1987 & JP 62 091092 A (OK ENG:KK), Apr. 25, 1987.
Patent Abstracts of Japan vol. 012, No. 001 (M-656), Jan. 6, 1988 & JP 62 166135 A (Fuji Electric Co Ltd), Jul. 22, 1987.
Patent Abstracts of Japan vol. 014, No. 222 (E-0926), May 10, 1990 & JP 02 056197 A (Sanyo Electric Co Ltd), Feb. 26, 1990.
Patent Abstracts of Japan vol. 017, No. 039 (E-1311), Jan. 25, 1993 & JP 04 257189 A (Sony Corp), Sep. 11, 1992.
Patent Abstracts of Japan vol. 017, No. 521 (E-1435), Sep. 20, 1993 & JP 05 137144 A (Kyocera Corp), Jun. 1, 1993.
Patent Abstracts of Japan vol. 1996, No. 09, Sep. 30, 1996 & JP 08 124069 A (Toyota Motor Corp), May 17, 1996.
Patent Abstracts of Japan vol. 1997, No. 10, Oct. 31, 1997 & JP 09 163357 A (Nippon Soken Inc), Jun. 20, 1997.
Patent Abstracts of Japan vol. 1998, No. 02, Jan. 30, 1998 & JP 09 272399 A (Nippon Soken Inc), Oct. 21, 1997.
Patent Abstracts of Japan vol. 1998, No. 8, Jun. 30, 1998 & JP 10 076880 A (Muakami Corp), Mar. 24, 1998.
PCT/US2010/022012, Invitation to Pay Additional Fees with Communication of Partial International Search, Jul. 21, 2010.
Peter G. Thurlow, Letter (including exhibits) Regarding Patent Owner's Response to Initial Office Action in Ex Parte Reexamination, Mar. 27, 2012.
Preliminary Claim Construction and Identification of Extrinsic Evidence of Defendant/Counterclaimant SmartDriveSystems, Inc.' in DriveCam, Inc. v. SmartDrive Systems, Inc., Case No. 3:11-CV-00997-H (RBB), for the Southern District of California. Nov. 8, 2011.
Quinn Maughan, ‘DriveCam Enterprise Services’, Jan. 5, 2006.
Quinn Maughan, ‘DriveCam Managed Services’, Jan. 5, 2006.
Quinn Maughan, ‘DriveCam Standard Edition’, Jan. 5, 2006.
Quinn Maughan, ‘DriveCam Unit Installation’, Jul. 21, 2005.
Quinn Maughan, ‘Enterprise Services’, Apr. 17, 2006.
Quinn Maughan, ‘Enterprise Services’, Apr. 7, 2006.
Quinn Maughan, ‘Hindsight Installation Guide’, Sep. 29, 2005.
Quinn Maughan, ‘Hindsight Users Guide’, Jun. 7, 2005.
Ronnie Rittenberry, ‘Eyes on the Road’, Jul. 2004.
SmartDrives Systems, Inc's Production, SO14246-S014255, Nov. 16, 2011.
Supplement to DriveCam's Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Preliminary Infringement Contentions' in DriveCam, Inc. v. SmartDrive Systems, Inc., Case No. 3:11-CV-00997-H-RBB, for the Southern District of California. Oct. 14, 2011.
The DriveCam, Nov. 6, 2002.
The DriveCam, Nov. 8, 2002.
Traqmate GPS Data Acquisition's Traqmate Data Acquisition with Video Overlay system was used to create a video of a driving event on Oct. 2, 2005 (available at http://www.trackvision.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.php? t=51&sid=1184fbbcbe3be5c87ffa0f2ee6e2da76), printed from site on Jan. 11, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,639, entitled ‘Driver Risk Assessment System and Method Employing Selectively Automatic Event Scoring’, filed Jan. 21, 2010.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/377,167, Final Office Action dated Nov. 8, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/377,157, filed Mar. 16, 2006 entitled, “Vehicle Event Recorder Systems and Networks Having Parallel Communications Links”.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/377,167, filed Mar. 16, 2006 entitled, “Vehicle Event Recorder Systems and Networks Having Integrated Cellular Wireless Communications Systems”.
USPTO Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/297,669, mailed Nov. 7, 2011, 15 pages.
USPTO Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/957,810, mailed Jun. 27, 2014, 24 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/296,906, mailed Apr. 2, 2009, 7 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/296,906, mailed Nov. 6, 2009, 9 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/297,669, mailed Apr. 28, 2011, 11 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/299,028, mailed Apr. 24, 2008, 9 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/377,164, mailed Nov. 19, 2007, 7 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/377,164, mailed Nov. 25, 2011, 9 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/377,164, mailed Sep. 11, 2008, 8 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/377,167, mailed Jun. 5, 2008, 11 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for 11/800,876, mailed Dec. 1, 2010, 12 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/800,876, mailed Dec. 20, 2011, 8 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/096,591, mailed May 20, 2014, 19 pages.
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/296,907, Mailed Mar. 22, 2007 ( 17 pages).
USPTO Non-final Office Action mailed Aug. 27, 2009 during prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 11/566,424.
USPTO Non-Final Office Action mailed Nov. 27, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/957,810, filed Aug. 2, 2013.
Veeraraghavan, H., et al., Computer Vision Algorithms for Intersection Monitoring, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 4(2):78- 89 (2003); Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TITS.2003.821212.
Wijesoma, W.S., et al., Road Curb Tracking in an Urban Environment, Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of Information Fusion, 1:261-268 (2003).
World News Tonight, CBC Television New Program discussing teen drivers using the DriveCam Program and DriveCam Technology, Oct. 10, 2005, on PC formatted CD-R, World News Tonight.wmv, 7.02 MB, Created Jan. 12, 2011.
Written Opinion issued in PCT/US07/68328 on Oct. 15, 2007.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2006/47042. Mailed Feb. 25. 2008 (5 pages).
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2006/47055, Mailed Mar. 20, 2008 (5 pages).
Inovate Motorsports, OT-1 16 Channel OBD-II Interface User Manual, Version 1.0, Nov. 28, 2007, pp. 3, 4, 21 & 27.
Trivinci Systems, LLC, Race-Keeper Systems User Guide, Jan. 2011, v1, 1.02, pp. 34 and 39.
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/036,299, mailed Aug. 12, 2014.
USPTO Non-Final Office Action mailed Jan. 4, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/529,134, filed Oct. 30, 2014 (65 pgs).
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US15/60721 dated Feb. 26, 2016, 11 pages.
Trivinci Systems, LLC, “Race-Keeper System User Guide”, V1 .1.02, Jan. 2011, p. 21.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150181172 A1 Jun 2015 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11377164 Mar 2006 US
Child 14634688 US