This application is related to, and claims priority from, Japanese Patent Application No. 2007-031098, filed Feb. 9, 2007 and Japanese Patent Application No. 2006-092334, filed Mar. 29, 2006, the entireties of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein and made a part of the present specification. Application Ser. Nos. 11/692,824; 11/692,808; and 11/692,814, entitled VEHICLE EXHAUST SYSTEM, all filed on Mar. 28, 2007, are also incorporated by reference herein in their entireties and made a part of the present specification.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention generally relates to an exhaust system for a vehicle. More particularly, the present invention relates to an exhaust system for a straddle-type vehicle and a straddle-type vehicle incorporating such an exhaust system.
2. Description of the Related Art
An exhaust system used in a straddle-type vehicle (for example, a motorcycle) is requested to meet two demands, that is, an exhaust efficiency, at which exhaust gases discharged from an engine should be efficiently discharged, and reduction of exhaust noise, which accompanies discharge of exhaust gases of high pressure and high temperature.
In particular, the demand for noise reduction or noise elimination has increased as noise regulations have been made more rigorous. Accordingly, it is increasingly desired that noise reduction or noise elimination be attained, while at the same time maintaining exhaust efficiency at desirable levels for performance reasons.
When design of an exhaust system is considered only in terms of exhaust efficiency, a muffler (exhaust system) is preferably extended straight. However, such an exhaust system is not well accommodated in a vehicle body of a motorcycle. Accordingly, in order to lessen an exhaust resistance, the exhaust system is extended toward the rear of a vehicle body in an attempt to avoid tight radius bends, which is difficult in many cases because of the front wheel of the motorcycle and a bank angle of the combustion chamber(s). Normally, a muffler having an ideal length in terms of engine performance is only seldom accommodated intact in a configuration of a motorcycle and, as compared with design of a muffler for four-wheel passenger cars, the design of a motorcycle exhaust system to meet both performance and physical constraints is significantly more challenging. That is, it is difficult in the context of a motorcycle exhaust system to achieve a length of the exhaust system that will both provide desired performance attributes and be accommodated within the space constraints of a motorcycle while maintaining a configuration that is as smooth as possible.
Also, not only an exhaust efficiency, but also a weight of a an exhaust system has a significant influence on the handling characteristics of a motorcycle. That is, because a motorcycle is relatively lightweight, even a weight of about one (1) kg has a great influence on the motorcycle. Moreover, because certain components of the exhaust system (e.g., the silencer) are usually located at a distance from a center of gravity of the motorcycle, the adverse influence of excess weight of the exhaust system on the handling characteristics of the motorcycle is increased.
On the other hand, in spite of any contrivance on a construction of the exhaust system, a certain silencer (or muffler) volume is needed to some extent to provide a noise reducing effect. In order to conform to regulations on noise, which are made increasingly rigorous, a silencer cannot but be made larger in many cases. Moreover, when a metallic sheet from which the silencer is constructed is thin, it vibrates thereby increasing noise. To avoid such a situation, the silencer is by all means liable to be relatively large in weight. An increase in the weight of the silencer results in undesired handling characteristics of the associated motorcycle.
In this manner, since a structure of an exhaust system for motorcycles is determined in terms of a variety of interrelated factors, it has been extremely difficult to realize an exhaust system in which miniaturization is achieved and a desired exhaust efficiency and noise-reduction characteristics are met.
Preferred embodiments of the present invention involve an exhaust system for a straddle-type vehicle, which includes an engine. The exhaust system includes an exhaust pipe connectable to the engine and a silencer connected to the exhaust pipe. The silencer comprises an outer housing and an inner core accommodated in the outer housing. A sound absorbing material is arranged in a manner to come into close contact with an outer surface of the inner core in the silencer. An air space is provided between an outer surface of the sound absorbing material and an inner surface of the outer housing.
A preferred embodiment involves an exhaust system as described above, in which a partition is provided on the outer surface of the sound absorbing material to separate the sound absorbing material and the air space. A plurality of through-holes is formed in at least a portion of the partition.
A preferred embodiment involves an exhaust system as described above, in which a plurality of through-holes is formed in at least a portion of the inner core of the silencer.
A preferred embodiment involves an exhaust system as described above, in which the sound absorbing material comprises one or more of stainless steel wool and glass wool.
A preferred embodiment involves a straddle-type vehicle provided with the exhaust system as described in any of the above paragraphs.
A preferred embodiment involves a straddle-type vehicle as described above, in which a downstream end of the inner core of the silencer is positioned forward of an axis of the axle shaft of a rear wheel provided on the straddle-type vehicle.
A preferred embodiment involves a straddle-type vehicle as described above, wherein the engine of the straddle-type vehicle operates on a four-stroke combustion principle.
A preferred embodiment involves a straddle-type vehicle as described above, wherein the straddle-type vehicle is an off-road motorcycle.
According to one or more embodiments of the invention, because the silencer comprises an outer housing and an inner core accommodated in the outer housing, and a sound absorbing material is arranged in a manner to come into close contact with an outer surface of the inner core, exhaust noise of exhaust gases introduced into the silencer can be absorbed by the sound absorbing material whereby it is possible to reduce the exhaust noise. Moreover, because an air space is provided between an outer surface of the sound absorbing material and an inner surface of the outer housing, exhaust gases can be expanded into the air space whereby it is possible to produce a noise reducing effect. That is, with the exhaust system according to certain preferred embodiments of the invention, it is possible to improve a damping characteristic of the muffler owing to both effects of noise reduction by the sound absorbing material and noise reduction by an expansion chamber effect.
These and other features, aspects and advantages of the present invention are described below with reference to drawings of preferred embodiments, which are intended to illustrate, but not to limit the present invention. The drawings contain eight (8) figures.
a) is a perspective view showing the exhaust system of the motorcycle of
a) to 3(c) are schematic cross sectional views showing examples of a silencer of the exhaust system according to an embodiment of the invention.
a) and 4(b) are schematic cross sectional views of the silencer shown in
a) and 5(b) are schematic cross sectional views of an exhaust system of a comparative example of an internal structure of a silencer.
a) and 7(b) are schematic cross sectional views of an exhaust system according to another embodiment of the invention.
While an exhaust system for a motorcycle is designed under various restrictions, conventional design philosophy is that a noise reducing effect cannot be actually produced unless the silencer is increased in volume. On the other hand, it is not possible to avoid a phenomenon in which an increase in volume of the silencer brings about an adverse affect on the handling characteristics of the motorcycle. In a muffler in, for example, present four-stroke motocross motorcycles (in particular, sports vehicles), a silencer is increased in volume whereby noise reduction and running performance are met, so that the muffler is large and heavy.
The present inventors have realize an exhaust device (muffler), which is small-sized and light while meeting performance criteria (exhaust property) and a noise characteristics. Embodiments of the invention are described below with reference to the drawings. In addition, the invention is not limited to the following embodiment.
The muffler 100 according to the embodiment includes the exhaust pipe 20 connected to the engine 50 of the motorcycle 1000, and the silencer 10 connected to the exhaust pipe 20. With a construction shown in
A state, in which the muffler 100 is removed from the motorcycle 1000 for convenience, is shown in
The exhaust pipe 20 connects to an exhaust opening of the engine 50 as shown in
a) to 3(c) are cross sectional views schematically showing a structure of the silencer 10, into which exhaust gases are introduced. The silencer 10 includes an outer housing, or cylinder 10a, and an inner core, or cylinder 10b, accommodated in the outer cylinder 10a. Although referred to herein as “cylinders,” the outer housing 10a and inner core 10b are not necessarily limited to circular cross-sectional shapes. The term “cylinder” is intended to be a broad term that includes any closed extrusion, including those having oval, rectangular and other non-circular or even varying cross-sectional shapes. The tail pipe 30 is connected to the silencer 10 to lead exhaust gases to the external environment.
A plurality of through-holes, or punched holes 13, is formed in at least a portion (region P) of the side wall of the inner cylinder 10b of the silencer 10. The punched holes 13 are small holes (through-holes) formed in the silencer 10 (here, the inner cylinder 10b). The punched holes 13 serve to lead exhaust gases to a sound absorbing material 15 arranged on the outer wall of the inner cylinder 10b. Although referred to herein as “punched holes,” the holes 13 can be formed by any suitable process or method. Also, the punched holes 13 can be appropriately adjusted in diameter to have a magnitude such that the inner cylinder 10b can maintain a sound absorbing material holding function and efficiently transmit energy to the sound absorbing material.
In an example shown in
The sound absorbing material 15 in the embodiment is not fully filled between the outer cylinder 10a and the inner cylinder 10b, but arranged offset toward the inner cylinder 10b. In other words, an air space, or air layer 19 (referred below to as “back air layer 19”), is provided between an outer surface of the sound absorbing material 15 and the inner surface of the outer cylinder 10a.
Further, a partition 10c is provided as a member that provides a partition between the sound absorbing material 15 and the back air layer 19. The partition 10c comprises a generally cylindrical-shaped member made of stainless steel and arranged on the outer surface of the sound absorbing material 15. Similar to the housing 10a and core 10b, the partition 10c may have a cross-sectional shape other than circular. Punched holes 11 are formed in at least a part (region Q) of the partition 10c. The punched holes 11 in the embodiment are small holes (through-holes) and can use the same structure as that of the punched holes 13 formed on the inner cylinder 10b. The partition 10c serves to lead exhaust gases, noise of which is reduced by the sound absorbing material 15, to the back air layer 19 through the punched holes 11 to expand the same.
With the exhaust device 100, the silencer 10 comprises the outer cylinder 10a and the inner cylinder 10b accommodated in the outer cylinder 10a and the sound absorbing material 15 is arranged in a manner to come into close contact with the outer wall of the inner cylinder 10b, exhaust noise of exhaust gases led from the exhaust pipe 20 can be absorbed by the sound absorbing material 15 to be reduced (noise reducing effect).
Furthermore, because the back air layer 19, which is separated from the sound absorbing material 15 by the partition 10c with the punched holes 11, is provided between the outer surface of the sound absorbing material 15 and the inner surface of the outer cylinder 10a, exhaust gases, noise of which is reduced by the sound absorbing material 15, can be expanded into the back air layer 19 through the punched holes 11 of the partition 10c, thus producing a noise reducing effect.
That is, with the illustrated exhaust device 100, it is possible to improve a damping characteristic of the muffler 100 owing to both effects of noise reduction by the sound absorbing material 15 and noise reduction by pipe bulging, in other words, an expansion chamber effect.
In addition, the muffler structure provided with the sound absorbing material 15 and the back air layer 19 can be preferably used in a small-sized muffler, in which miniaturization and reduced weight are achieved. “Small-sized muffler” referred to herein is the muffler 100 having a straight pipe structure positioned in front of an axis of an axle shaft 72 of a rear wheel 70 of the motorcycle 1000 shown in
In contrast, when the illustrated muffler is adopted, even the small-sized muffler as shown in
In addition, the downstream end 10d of the silencer 10 more specifically corresponds to a downstream end of the inner cylinder 10b provided in the silencer. Accordingly, even when a part of the tail pipe 30 connected to the silencer 10 is positioned rearward of the axle shaft 72 of the rear wheel 70, the structure corresponds to the small-sized muffler referred herein to. Also, the muffler structure is not limited to the muffler of the type shown in
In addition, it is possible to use, as the sound absorbing material, for example, stainless steel wool, aluminum wool, ferrite, etc., in addition to glass wool. Since stainless steel wool is larger in specific gravity than other sound absorbing materials (for example, glass wool), an additional advantage is provided in that it becomes unnecessary to increase an amount of a sound absorbing material.
Also, while the punched holes 13 and the punched holes 11 in the embodiment are circular in shape, they are not limited thereto but can be otherwise shaped (for example, flat oval, elliptical, polygonal, etc.). Further, the punched holes 13 may be varied in diameter with locations of formation, or all the punched holes 13 as formed may be the same in diameter.
An internal construction of the silencer 10 according to the embodiment is described below with reference to
Shapes of respective members, which constitute the silencer 10 shown in
An explanation is provided below with respect to the effect that the sound absorbing material and the back air layer have on a damping characteristic of the exhaust system, in addition to comparative examples (
a) shows an internal construction of a silencer 10′ as a comparative example 1 and
Initially, a comparison is made between the preferred embodiment of
When a comparison is made between Line “L0” and Line “L1”, it is found that Line “L0” is wholly smaller in damping level (sound pressure level) than Line “L1”. In other words, the silencer 10 according to the embodiment becomes low in noise value as compared with the silencer 10′ of the comparative example 1. The reason why the embodiment is small in noise value as compared with the comparative example 1 is due to that construction, in which the back air layer 19 is provided outside the glass wool 15 within the silencer 10. That is, according to the embodiment, it has been confirmed that it is possible to improve a damping characteristic of the muffler owing to both effects of noise reduction by the glass wool 15 and noise reduction by an expansion chamber effect.
Subsequently, a comparison is made between the embodiment of
The silencers shown in the embodiment of
This phenomenon is made use of to enable selectively decreasing a damping level in a specified frequency range. For example, in the case where it is desired that a noise component in a frequency range “Fa (Hz) to Fb (Hz)” be selectively decreased, it suffices to increase an amount of glass wool as indicated by Line “L2” to decrease the ratio of a back air layer to a glass wool layer. On the other hand, in the case where it is desired that a noise component in a frequency range “Fc (Hz) to Fd (Hz)” be decreased, it suffices to decrease an amount of glass wool as indicated by Line “L0” to increase the ratio of a back air layer to a glass wool layer. In this manner, a damping characteristic in a desired frequency range can be made favorable by appropriately adjusting the ratio of a glass wool and a back air layer.
Further, a noise component in a desired frequency range can be decreased not only by the ratio of a glass wool and a back air layer but also a range (region Q) in which the punched holes 11 of the partition 10c are formed. A further embodiment (
a) shows, as an example a, an arrangement in which a region Q of punched holes 11 extends between an upstream end of the partition 10c and a downstream end of the partition (similar to
This phenomenon is made use of to enable selectively decreasing a noise component in a specific frequency range. That is, a damping characteristic in a desired frequency range can be made favorable by appropriately adjusting the range of the region Q of the punched holes 11. For example, in the case where it is desired that a noise component in a frequency range “Fg (Hz) to Fh (Hz)” be decreased, it suffices to widen the region Q like Line “L3” in the embodiment of
According to the invention, the silencer 10 comprises the outer cylinder 10a and the inner cylinder 10b accommodated in the outer cylinder 10a and the sound absorbing material 15 is arranged in a manner to come into close contact with the outer wall of the inner cylinder 10b, so that the sound absorbing material can absorb an exhaust noise of exhaust gases introduced into the silencer 10 whereby it is possible to reduce the exhaust noise. In addition, because the air layer 19 is provided between the outer surface of the sound absorbing material 15 and the inner surface of the outer cylinder, exhaust gases can be expanded into the air layer 19 whereby it is also possible to produce a noise reducing effect. That is, with the exhaust device according to preferred embodiments of the invention, it is possible to improve a damping characteristic of the muffler according to the embodiment owing to both effects of noise reduction by the sound absorbing material 15 and noise reduction by expansion (back air layer 19).
When the muffler structure according to the preferred embodiments is adopted, even a typical, small-sized muffler (muffler arranged forwardly of the axle shaft 72 of the rear wheel 70) can meet the damping characteristic with little increase in weight of a whole muffler.
In particular, in the case where stainless steel wool having a large specific gravity is used as the sound absorbing material 15, it is unnecessary to increase an amount of the stainless steel wool as filled, so that a further advantage is provided in that substantially the same damping characteristic is obtained with the same weight.
Also, in the case where an expensive glass wool is used as the sound absorbing material 15, it is unnecessary to increase an amount of the glass wool as filled, so that the manufacturing cost is lowered.
In addition, while
While the invention has been described with respect to preferred embodiments, such descriptions are not limitative but various modifications are of course possible. According to the invention, it is possible to provide a muffler for a straddle-type vehicle, which achieves miniaturization while meeting a demand for a noise reducing characteristic.
Although this invention has been disclosed in the context of certain preferred embodiments and examples, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention extends beyond the specifically disclosed embodiments to other alternative embodiments and/or uses of the invention and obvious modifications and equivalents thereof. In particular, while the present exhaust system and vehicle employing the exhaust system have been described in the context of particularly preferred embodiments, the skilled artisan will appreciate, in view of the present disclosure, that certain advantages, features and aspects of the system may be realized in a variety of other applications, many of which have been noted above. Additionally, it is contemplated that various aspects and features of the invention described can be practiced separately, combined together, or substituted for one another, and that a variety of combination and subcombinations of the features and aspects can be made and still fall within the scope of the invention. Thus, it is intended that the scope of the present invention herein disclosed should not be limited by the particular disclosed embodiments described above, but should be determined only by a fair reading of the claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2006-092334 | Mar 2006 | JP | national |
2007-031098 | Feb 2007 | JP | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
700785 | Kull | May 1902 | A |
1366632 | Bjarne | Jan 1921 | A |
1820972 | Haas | Jul 1929 | A |
1756916 | Stranahan | Apr 1930 | A |
1844105 | Schnell | Feb 1932 | A |
1853429 | Jackson | Apr 1932 | A |
1861775 | Aseltine | Jun 1932 | A |
1991014 | Compo | Feb 1935 | A |
2008964 | Mikulie | Jul 1935 | A |
2034186 | Heath | Mar 1936 | A |
2035500 | Nulty | Mar 1936 | A |
2041767 | Jack | May 1936 | A |
2065343 | Mitchell et al. | Dec 1936 | A |
2115128 | Starkweather et al. | Apr 1938 | A |
2150530 | Warsing | Mar 1939 | A |
2185584 | Boyce | Jan 1940 | A |
2234612 | Petersen | Mar 1941 | A |
2239549 | Chipley | Apr 1941 | A |
2311676 | Maxim | Feb 1943 | A |
2512155 | Hill | Jun 1950 | A |
2523260 | Campbell | Sep 1950 | A |
2543461 | Latulippe | Feb 1951 | A |
2575233 | Gustave | Nov 1951 | A |
2609886 | Cline | Sep 1952 | A |
2640557 | Gaffney | Jun 1953 | A |
2730188 | Bailey | Jan 1956 | A |
2784797 | Bailey | Mar 1957 | A |
2788078 | Reindl | Apr 1957 | A |
2808896 | Wilman | Oct 1957 | A |
2904125 | Bourne et al. | Sep 1959 | A |
3109511 | Slayter et al. | Nov 1963 | A |
3563338 | Rader | Feb 1971 | A |
3710891 | Flugger | Jan 1973 | A |
3786791 | Richardson | Jan 1974 | A |
3955643 | Clark | May 1976 | A |
3982605 | Sneckenberger | Sep 1976 | A |
4108275 | Black et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4192402 | Nakagawa et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4360076 | Suyama | Nov 1982 | A |
4371053 | Jones | Feb 1983 | A |
4444288 | Sekiya et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4523662 | Tanaka et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4580656 | Fukuda | Apr 1986 | A |
4589517 | Fukuda | May 1986 | A |
4595073 | Thawani | Jun 1986 | A |
4598790 | Uesugi et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4601168 | Harris | Jul 1986 | A |
4674594 | Jensen | Jun 1987 | A |
4700805 | Tanaka et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
5107953 | Shimizu et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5350888 | Sager et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5365025 | Kraai et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5371331 | Wall | Dec 1994 | A |
5509947 | Burton | Apr 1996 | A |
5627351 | Okuma et al. | May 1997 | A |
5633482 | Erion et al. | May 1997 | A |
5661272 | Iannetti | Aug 1997 | A |
5663537 | Ko et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5783780 | Watanabe et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5892186 | Flugger | Apr 1999 | A |
5902970 | Ferri | May 1999 | A |
5962821 | Iannetti | Oct 1999 | A |
5969299 | Yamaguchi et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6026930 | Ogisu et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6070695 | Ohtaka et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6082488 | Lin | Jul 2000 | A |
6260659 | Takahashi et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6467572 | Liu | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6520285 | Tobias | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6571910 | Storm | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6739426 | Sherikar et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6745562 | Berriman et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6968922 | Kawamata et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7374016 | Yamaguchi et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7464787 | Davis, Jr. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
20020134614 | Chen | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030136607 | Kawamata et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20060219476 | Southway et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3724087 | Feb 1989 | DE |
40 06 438 | Sep 1990 | DE |
1 347 893 | Jan 1964 | FR |
2668539 | Apr 1992 | FR |
2681905 | Apr 1993 | FR |
2 041 083 | Sep 1980 | GB |
2 110 298 | Oct 1982 | GB |
2 158 878 | Nov 1985 | GB |
53 147142 | Dec 1978 | JP |
54028952 | Mar 1979 | JP |
62082213 | Apr 1987 | JP |
62243913 | Oct 1987 | JP |
63 001714 | Jan 1988 | JP |
63001713 | Jan 1988 | JP |
01 069709 | Mar 1989 | JP |
03264716 | Nov 1991 | JP |
04081507 | Mar 1992 | JP |
05026025 | Feb 1993 | JP |
05280323 | Oct 1993 | JP |
06117242 | Apr 1994 | JP |
08-312324 | Nov 1996 | JP |
08-312324 | Nov 1996 | JP |
2003-184541 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2008138608 | Jun 2008 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070227811 A1 | Oct 2007 | US |