1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to structures for improving the aerodynamic profile of vehicles, especially for the front end of a trailer box in a tractor-trailer combination.
2. Description of Related Art
The amount of power needed to move a vehicle over land or through the air increases with the speed of the vehicle due to aerodynamic drag. The amount of power necessary to overcome aerodynamic drag directly translates into increased fuel consumption, and thus cost of operation.
A variety of innovations aimed at reducing the aerodynamic drag of various transport vehicles, including tractor-trailer combinations, have been introduced in the prior art. These include efforts to make the hood, windscreen, fenders etc. more streamlined in form, as well as by adding fairings to the cab roof, and in some cases, to the trailer box.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,799,791 discloses a vehicle fairing structure that may be deployed on the rear of a trailer box. While this fairing structure significantly reduces drag at the rear end of the trailer box, a significant amount of drag is also associated with the front of the trailer box where there is known to be an area of high pressure and relatively stagnant air approximately at the middle of the forward vertical face of the trailer cab. In general, the present inventors believe that the aerodynamic drag arising as a result of the gap between the tractor cab and trailer increases with the size of the gap (i.e., the distance between the rear of the tractor cab or roof fairing structure and the leading edge of the trailer box).
Accordingly, fairing structures designed to direct airflow around the gap have not been completely successful. On the one hand, known fairing structures for the forward face of a trailer box can be bulky and complex, involving moving parts. They may be difficult to install or impede access to important parts of the rig. A less obtrusive fairing structure, on the other hand, may be less effective in redirecting wind and more susceptible to the negative effects of crosswind conditions. Accordingly, there continues to be a need for fairing structures that effectively and elegantly address the problem of aerodynamic drag at the leading forward face of a trailer box in a tractor-trailer combination.
A system incorporating a fairing structure according to the invention is disclosed in U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/844,442, and in a non-provisional application claiming priority thereto and filed concurrently herewith. The aforesaid patent and applications (U.S. Pat. No. 6,799,791, Provisional Application No. 60/844,442 and the non-provisional application Ser. No. 11/684,104, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,404,592 filed herewith are incorporated by reference herein.
In one aspect, the invention is a vehicle fairing structure for a vehicle having a front vehicular component and a rear vehicular component (such as a tractor-trailer). The fairing structure comprises: a top surface (sometimes referred to herein as the “horizontal surface”) adapted to be attached to the roof, or the top, of the rear vehicular component, and two side surfaces (sometimes referred to herein as the “vertical surfaces”) each adapted to be attached to respective sides of the rear vehicular component, joining opposite ends of the top surface and generally perpendicular to the top surface. Each of the top and side surfaces has a proximal edge adapted to be positioned adjacent the vehicle, and a distal edge adapted to be positioned away from the vehicle with respect to the respective proximal edge. The area bounded by the distal edges of the surfaces is smaller than an area bounded by the proximal edges. The fairing structure is positioned adjacent a rear vehicular component (in preferred embodiments the front of a trailer box) in a gap between the rear vehicular component and a front vehicular component (such as a tractor cab), sufficiently close to said front vehicular component to impede or otherwise lessen transverse and vertical airflow in the gap, lessening aerodynamic drag. This is accomplished by positioning the distal and proximal edges of the surfaces relative to each other such that the external faces of the fairing structure, when positioned adjacent the rear vehicular component of the vehicle in the gap, re-directs air from the rear vehicular component and also impedes or otherwise lessens vertical and transverse air flow in the gap, forming an effective closure of the gap.
In the most preferred embodiment, the vehicle fairing structure is positioned in the gap between a tractor cab and a trailer box in a tractor-trailer combination, such that the proximal edges of the top and side surfaces attach to the leading top and side edges, respectively, of the front surface of the trailer box, and the top and first and second side surfaces (collectively the “fairing surfaces”) are curved so that the distal edges bound a vertical planar area inboard of the sides of the trailer box. For this purpose, although not a requirement, the fairing surfaces may be attached directly to the roof or top and front side edges of the trailer box forming an uninterrupted surface from the fairing structure to the trailer.
While the preferred embodiment of the invention is described in connection with a tractor-trailer combination, a fairing structure according to the invention may be used with any tandem vehicle arrangement. The invention is particularly suited for use on a tandem vehicle combination having a front vehicular component and a rear vehicular component connected to the front vehicular component. In such tandem vehicle arrangements, the rear vehicular component often projects above the front vehicular component and thus causes additional aerodynamic drag of a type referred to as form drag. Also, in such tandem vehicle arrangements, the rear vehicular component is separated from the front vehicular component by a gap, which also creates aerodynamic drag. The fairing structure is preferably positioned on the front of the rear vehicular component, and addresses both of these drag-producing factors.
To describe the drag created by the gap, the near wake of a bluff backed object like a tractor cab may be described as a region of slower (or even reversed) flow, bounded by a shear layer. The shear layer is the boundary between the faster moving external flow and the slow moving air dragged along behind the cab. In the absence of cross wind, there is a general flow upwards in the gap, driven by the low pressure at the top of the gap. This tends to increase the size of a separation bubble formed on the forward end of the trailer roof, which increases drag.
There is also created in connection with the movement of the tractor-trailer combination a horseshoe vortex having a center extending below the trailer, as shown in
Cross wind creates a general flow from the windward to the leeward side, which is faster at the back of the gap than at the front. The flow may be sufficiently strong to sweep away the horseshoe vortex and replace it with a single vertical vortex (not shown in the Figures). Additionally, a stagnation line may form near the windward edge of the trailer's forward face, which creates a region of high pressure, and therefore drag, and also creates a vortex in the opposite sense, between the stagnation line and the bubble at the front of the trailer side, which increases drag.
In view of the foregoing general observations on the gap aerodynamics, the requirements of the fairing structure may be discussed in terms of the effect of the external face and the internal face. For the external face, a first requirement is that the distal edges should be positioned inside the volume bounded by the shear layer. In the absence of cross-wind, this simply means making the area bounded by the distal edges small enough to be generally no larger than the cab area projected rearward. However, when there is crosswind, the cab wake is displaced downwind, so that on the windward side the distal edge must be farther in, close enough to the center line that the above requirement is still met. In either case, fast moving air is prevented from impinging on the forward face of the trailer.
For the internal face, in the absence of cross-wind, the fairing tends to reduce or reverse the upwards flow, which consequently reduces the separation bubble on the trailer roof, which reduces drag and reduces the strength of the horseshoe vortex. In the presence of cross-wind, the fairing structure reduces or reverses the upward flow (as in the case of no-crosswind), but also reduces or reverses the general leeward flow, again reducing drag. The fairing structures also block air from entering the gap.
In
In
Each of the horizontal and first and second vertical surfaces has a proximal edge adapted to be positioned adjacent a rear vehicular component 20, which is typically a trailer box in a tractor-trailer combination. Attachment may be permanent, such as by riveting, or temporary, using appropriate hardware allowing for ease of replacement or removal. If desired, the fairing structure may be riveted or otherwise directly attached to the trailer box, without hardware being needed to be attached to the forward face of the trailer box. Preferably, the boundary between the front edges 150 of the trailer box or rear vehicular component 20 and the fairing structure is continuous so that no substantial barrier to air flow is created at that point.
Optionally, support walls 160 may attach to the distal edges of the horizontal and vertical edges of the fairing surfaces and are, for example (but not necessarily), perpendicular to the leading surface of the trailer box. These support walls join with the front surface of the trailer box using the same or similar attachment hardware as may be used to attach the fairing surfaces to the edges of the trailer box.
As shown in
All of the foregoing features of the fairing structure surfaces are to ensure that the fairing (1) more smoothly re-directs the air stream around the portion of the rear component which projects above the front component, thereby reducing drag and (2) traps air, thereby effectively filling the gap and impeding or otherwise lessening transverse and vertical flow in the gap, and thus reducing drag.
It is believed that when the fairing structure disclosed herein is positioned between a tractor cab and trailer box, and the tractor-trailer rig is in transit, the area about the central portion of the vertical windward wall of the trailer box tends to be an area of localized high pressure which is relatively stagnant as compared to air moving around the edges of the vehicle. The radius of curvature of the fairing surfaces structure is designed to re-direct air to the sides or top of a trailer box that would otherwise become trapped in the gap between a tractor cab and the trailer box or strike the flat surface of the front of the trailer box.
This application claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/844,511 and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/844,442, each filed Sep. 13, 2006, and which are each incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2101793 | Field, Jr. | Dec 1937 | A |
3415566 | Kerrigan | Dec 1968 | A |
3711146 | Madzsar et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
3834752 | Cook et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3934922 | MacCready et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
4022508 | Kirsch et al. | May 1977 | A |
4036519 | Servais et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4057280 | MacCready et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4113299 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4142755 | Keedy | Mar 1979 | A |
4156543 | Taylor et al. | May 1979 | A |
4311334 | Jenkins | Jan 1982 | A |
4316630 | Evans | Feb 1982 | A |
4360232 | Elder | Nov 1982 | A |
4401338 | Caldwell | Aug 1983 | A |
4457550 | Gielow et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4518188 | Witten | May 1985 | A |
4553782 | Markland | Nov 1985 | A |
4601508 | Kerian | Jul 1986 | A |
4611847 | Sullivan | Sep 1986 | A |
4682808 | Bilanin | Jul 1987 | A |
4688841 | Moore | Aug 1987 | A |
4693506 | Massengill | Sep 1987 | A |
4702509 | Elliott, Sr. | Oct 1987 | A |
4746160 | Wiesemeyer | May 1988 | A |
4779915 | Straight | Oct 1988 | A |
4824165 | Fry | Apr 1989 | A |
4904015 | Haines | Feb 1990 | A |
5078448 | Selzer et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5190342 | Marlowe et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5280990 | Rinard | Jan 1994 | A |
5332280 | DuPont et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5375903 | Lechner | Dec 1994 | A |
5487586 | Kinkaide | Jan 1996 | A |
5595419 | Spears | Jan 1997 | A |
5658038 | Griffin | Aug 1997 | A |
5791724 | Wasley | Aug 1998 | A |
6428084 | Liss | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6793273 | Tuerk | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6799791 | Reiman et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6986544 | Wood | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7008005 | Graham | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7055890 | Crean | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7073845 | Ortega et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7234761 | Crean | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7318620 | Wood | Jan 2008 | B2 |
20030057736 | Long et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040239146 | Ortega et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080061597 A1 | Mar 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60844511 | Sep 2006 | US | |
60844442 | Sep 2006 | US |