The present invention generally relates to a system and method for imaging and detecting objects in a scene forward of a vehicle.
According to one aspect of the present invention, an imaging system is provided for a vehicle. The imaging system comprises: an imager configured to image a scene external and forward of the vehicle and to generate image data corresponding to the acquired images; and a processor configured to receive and analyze the image data to identify red light sources and further to analyze each red light source to determine if the red light source is detected for a predetermined time period, wherein if the red light source is not detected within a predetermined time period after it is detected, the processor determines that the red light source is a flashing red stop light, otherwise if the red light source is detected for a predetermined time period, the processor determines that the red light source may be a tail light of another vehicle.
According to another aspect of the present invention, a method is provided for distinguishing between tail lights of another vehicle and a flashing red stop light. The method comprises the steps of: providing an imager for use in a vehicle; imaging a scene external and forward of the vehicle and generating image data corresponding to the acquired images; receiving and analyzing the image data in a processor to identify red light sources and further analyze each red light source to determine if the red light source is detected for a predetermined time period; if the red light source is not detected within a predetermined time period after it is detected, determining that the red light source is a flashing red stop light; and otherwise if the red light source is detected for a predetermined time period, determining that the red light source may be a tail light of another vehicle.
According to another aspect of the present invention, a non-transitory tangible computer readable medium is provided having stored thereon software instructions that, when executed by a processor within a vehicle, cause the processor to distinguish between a tail light of another vehicle and a flashing red stop light by executing the steps comprising: controlling an imager to image a scene external and forward of the vehicle and generating image data corresponding to the acquired images; receiving and analyzing the image data in the processor to identify red light sources and further analyze each red light source to determine if the red light source is detected for a predetermined time period; if the red light source is not detected within a predetermined time period after it is detected, determining that the red light source is a flashing red stop light; and otherwise if the red light source is detected for a predetermined time period, determining that the red light source may be a tail light of another vehicle.
These and other features, advantages, and objects of the present invention will be further understood and appreciated by those skilled in the art by reference to the following specification, claims, and appended drawings.
The present invention will be more fully understood from the detailed description and the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Reference will now be made in detail to the present preferred embodiments, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numerals will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts. In the drawings, the depicted structural elements are not to scale and certain components are enlarged relative to the other components for purposes of emphasis and understanding.
The embodiments described herein relate to an imaging system for a vehicle and a method of detecting and/or categorizing objects in a scene forward of the vehicle. To assist in the understanding of an application of these embodiments, examples are provided that pertain to the use of the imaging system in an exterior light control system for controlling exterior lights of a controlled vehicle in response to image data acquired from an image sensor, which captures images forward of the vehicle. Prior systems are known for controlling exterior vehicle lights in response to images captured forward of the vehicle. In these prior systems, a controller would analyze the captured images and determine if any preceding or oncoming vehicles were present in a glare area in front of the vehicle employing the system. This “glare area” was the area in which the exterior lights would cause excessive glare to a driver if the exterior lights were in a high-beam state (or some state other than a low-beam state). If a vehicle was present in the glare area, the controller would respond by changing the state of the exterior lights so as to not cause glare for the other driver(s). Examples of such systems are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,837,994, 5,990,469, 6,008,486, 6,049,171, 6,130,421, 6,130,448, 6,166,698, 6,379,013, 6,403,942, 6,587,573, 6,611,610, 6,631,316, 6,774,988, 6,861,809, 7,321,112, 7,417,221, 7,565,006, 7,567,291, 7,653,215, 7,683,326, 7,881,839, 8,045,760, 8,120,652, and 8,543,254, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
One of the challenges for such systems is to distinguish lights from other vehicles and nonvehicle light sources. If the system were unable to accurately make such distinctions, it would respond to detection of a nonvehicle light source in the same way it would respond to an oncoming or leading vehicle and would reduce its lighting level when it does not need to be reduced. Such unnecessary reduction in lighting levels can be a distraction and a nuisance to the driver. Current systems analyze a number of different characteristics of each light source including brightness, size, shape, location, motion, AC modulation, etc. to compute a probability that a light source is a headlight or tail light of another vehicle.
One particular nonvehicle light source that current systems sometimes do not readily distinguish from vehicle tail lights is a flashing red stop light. As a result, the system will often turn off high beams or otherwise reduce illumination levels upon detecting a flashing red stop light at a considerably greater distance than is necessary. Accordingly, the embodiments described herein are provided to better distinguish a flashing red stoplight from vehicle tail lights such that the system will not reduce the illumination level of the exterior vehicle lights until the vehicle is within 100 meters of the stop light or even within 50 meters of the stop light.
To detect that a light is a red flashing light, the system analyzes the image data and identifies a red light source, which at this point may be a tail light or a red flashing light. Because the frequency at which red flashing stop lights flash is governed by law and therefore known, the system may then determines whether the identified red light source is flashing at the known frequency. The specific manner by which the system may perform this function is described further below following a description of an example of the basic structure of the system.
A first embodiment of an imaging system 10 is shown in
If imaging system 10 is used in a vehicle equipment control system, processor 30 may be configured to directly connect to the equipment (50) being controlled such that the generated control signals directly control the equipment. Alternatively, processor 30 may be configured to connect to an equipment control (60 and 70), which, in turn, is connected to the equipment being controlled (62 and 80) such that the control signals generated by processor 30 only indirectly control the equipment. For example, in the case of the equipment being exterior lights 80, processor 30 may analyze the image data from imager 20 so as to generate control signals that are more of a recommendation for an exterior light control 70 to use when controlling exterior lights 80. Thus, it can be said that the control signals are used to control the equipment. The control signals may further include not just a recommendation, but also a code representing a reason for the recommendation so that equipment controls 60 and 70 may determine whether or not to override a recommendation.
As shown in
According to one embodiment, the equipment that imaging system 10 can control may include one or more exterior lights 80 and the control signal generated by processor 30 may be an exterior light control signal. In this embodiment, exterior lights 80 may be controlled directly by processor 30 or by an exterior light control 70, which receives a control signal from processor 30. As used herein, the “exterior lights” broadly include any exterior lighting on the vehicle. Such exterior lights may include headlamps (both low and high beam if separate from one another), tail lights, foul weather lights (such as fog lights), brake lights, center-mounted stop lights (CHMSLs), turn signals, and back-up lights, etc. The exterior lights may be operated in several different modes including conventional low-beam and high-beam states. They may also be operated as daytime running lights, and additionally as super-bright high beams in those countries where they are permitted.
The brightness of the exterior lights may also be continuously varied between the low, high, and super-high states. Separate lights may be provided for obtaining each of these exterior lighting states or the actual brightness of the exterior lights may be varied to provide these different exterior lighting states. In either case, the “perceived brightness” or illumination pattern of the exterior lights is varied. As used herein, the term “perceived brightness” means the brightness of the exterior lights as perceived by an observer outside the vehicle. Most typically, such observers will be drivers or passengers in a preceding vehicle or in a vehicle traveling along the same street in the opposite direction. Ideally, the exterior lights are controlled such that if an observer is located in a vehicle within a “glare area” relative to the vehicle (i.e., the area in which the observer would perceive the brightness of the exterior lights as causing excessive glare), the beam illumination pattern is varied such that the observer is no longer in the glare area. The perceived brightness and/or glare area of the exterior lights may be varied by changing the illumination output of one or more exterior lights, by steering one or more lights to change the aim of one or more of the exterior lights, selectively blocking or otherwise activating or deactivating some or all of the exterior lights, altering the illumination pattern forward of the vehicle, or a combination of the above.
Imager 20 may be any conventional imager. Examples of suitable imagers are disclosed in published United States Patent Application Publication Nos. US 20080192132 A1 and US 20120072080 A1, and in U.S. Provisional Application Nos. 61/500,418 entitled “MEDIAN FILTER” filed on Jun. 23, 2011, by Jon H. Bechtel et al.; 61/544,315 entitled “MEDIAN FILTER” and filed on Oct. 7, 2011, by Jon H. Bechtel et al.; and 61/556,864 entitled “HIGH DYNAMIC RANGE CAMERA LOW LIGHT LEVEL FILTERING” filed on Nov. 8, 2011, by Jon H. Bechtel et al., the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The imager includes an image sensor (or camera) to capture images that may then be displayed and/or analyzed in order to detect and optionally categorize objects or to optionally control vehicle equipment such as exterior lights. For example, such imagers have been used for lane departure warning systems, forward collision warning systems, adaptive cruise control systems, pedestrian detection systems, night vision systems, terrain detection systems, parking assist systems, traffic sign recognition systems, and reverse camera display systems. Examples of systems using imagers for such purposes are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,837,994, 5,990,469, 6,008,486, 6,049,171, 6,130,421, 6,130,448, 6,166,698, 6,379,013, 6,403,942, 6,587,573, 6,611,610, 6,631,316, 6,774,988, 6,861,809, 7,321,112, 7,417,221, 7,565,006, 7,567,291, 7,653,215, 7,683,326, 7,881,839, 8,045,760, and 8,120,652, and in U.S. Provisional Application Nos. 61/512,213 entitled “RAISED LANE MARKER DETECTION SYSTEM AND METHOD THEREOF” and filed on Jul. 27, 2011, by Brock R. Rycenga et al., and 61/512,158 entitled “COLLISION WARNING SYSTEM AND METHOD THEREOF” and filed on Jul. 27, 2011, by Brock R. Rycenga et al., which together correspond to published United States Patent Application Publication No. US 2013/0028473 A1, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
In the example shown in
Processor 30 can also take advantage of the availability of signals (such as vehicle speed and yaw) communicated via discrete connections or over the vehicle bus 25 in making decisions regarding the operation of the exterior lights 80. In particular, speed input 21 provides vehicle speed information to the processor 30 from which speed can be a factor in determining the control state for the exterior lights 80 or other equipment. The reverse signal 22 informs processor 30 that the vehicle is in reverse, responsive to which the processor 30 may clear an electrochromic mirror element regardless of signals output from light sensors. Auto ON/OFF switch input 23 is connected to a switch having two states to dictate to processor 30 whether the vehicle exterior lights 80 should be automatically or manually controlled. The auto ON/OFF switch (not shown) connected to the ON/OFF switch input 23 may be incorporated with the headlamp switches that are traditionally mounted on the vehicle dashboard or incorporated into steering wheel column levels. Manual dimmer switch input 24 is connected to a manually actuated switch (not shown) to provide a manual override signal for an exterior light control state. Some or all of the inputs 21, 22, 23, 24 and outputs 42a, 42b, and 42c, as well as any other possible inputs or outputs, such as a steering wheel input, can optionally be provided through vehicle bus 25 shown in
Processor 30 can control or interact with, at least in part, other equipment 50 within the vehicle which is connected to processor 30 via vehicle bus 42. Specifically, the following are some examples of one or more equipment 50 that may be controlled by processor 30: exterior lights 80, a rain sensor, a compass, information displays, windshield wipers, a heater, a defroster, a defogger, an air conditioning system, a telephone system, a navigation system, a security system, a tire pressure monitoring system, a garage door opening transmitter, a remote keyless entry system, a telematics system, a voice recognition system such as a digital signal processor-based voice actuation system, a vehicle speed control, interior lights, rearview mirrors, an audio system, an engine control system, and various other switches and other display devices that may be located throughout the vehicle.
In addition, processor 30 may be, at least in part, located within a rearview assembly of a vehicle or located elsewhere within the vehicle. The processor 30 may also use a second processor (or processors) such as equipment control 60, which may be located in a rearview assembly or elsewhere in the vehicle in order to control certain kinds of equipment 62. Equipment control 60 can be connected to receive via vehicle bus 42 control signals generated by processor 30. Equipment control 60 subsequently communicates and controls equipment 62 via bus 61. For example, equipment control 60 may be a windshield wiper control unit which controls windshield wiper equipment, turning this equipment ON or OFF. Equipment control may also be an electrochromic mirror control unit where processor 30 is programmed to communicate with the electrochromic control unit in order for the electrochromic control unit to change the reflectivity of the electrochromic mirror(s) in response to information obtained from an ambient light sensor, a glare sensor, as well as any other components coupled to the processor. Specifically, equipment control unit 60 in communication with processor 30 may control the following equipment: exterior lights, a rain sensor, a compass, information displays, windshield wipers, a heater, a defroster, a defogger, air conditioning, a telephone system, a navigation system, a security system, a tire pressure monitoring system, a garage door opening transmitter, a remote keyless entry, a telemetry system, a voice recognition system such as a digital signal processor-based voice actuation system, a vehicle speed warning, interior lights, rearview mirrors, an audio system, a climate control, an engine control, and various other switches and other display devices that may be located throughout the vehicle.
Portions of imaging system 10 can be advantageously integrated into a rearview assembly 200 as illustrated in
Referring to
Processor 30 of
Rearview assembly 200 may include a mirror element or a display that displays a rearward view. The mirror element may be a prismatic element or an electro-optic element, such as an electrochromic element.
Additional details of the manner by which imaging system 10 may be integrated into a rearview mirror assembly 200 are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,611,610, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Alternative rearview mirror assembly constructions used to implement exterior light control systems are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,587,573, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The method for distinguishing between vehicle tail lights and flashing red stop lights will now be described with reference to
As shown through the graph in
Frames of image data are captured at a predetermined image capture rate of, for example, five frames per second (one frame captured every 200 milliseconds). Thus, if a red light is initially detected and then not detected within a predetermined number of frames (e.g., about four frames) thereafter, processor 30 can determine that the pulsing red light is a flashing red stop light. Given the known image capture rate, the predetermined number of frames is selected to correspond to a predetermined time period in which one would expect a stop light to turn on and then off based on the known frequency at which such stop lights flash.
Accordingly, referring back to
Next, around frame 31, the tail light is no longer present and the value of red light detected again periodically drops to zero. Therefore, processor 30 determines that no vehicles are currently present and that the red light is from a stop light, and thus generates a control signal to turn the high beams back on. As shown in
It should be noted that processor 30 is capable of determining that a flashing red light is a stop light as opposed to just some nonvehicle light. If processor 30 determined that such a flashing red light was just a nonvehicle light source, processor 30 would not necessarily know to turn off the high beams as the brightness increased. Nevertheless, when supplied with vehicle speed data, processor 30 may turn off the high beams when the vehicle speed falls below a threshold.
The above description is considered that of the preferred embodiments only. Modifications of the invention will occur to those skilled in the art and to those who make or use the invention. Therefore, it is understood that the embodiments shown in the drawings and described above are merely for illustrative purposes and not intended to limit the scope of the invention, which is defined by the claims as interpreted according to the principles of patent law, including the doctrine of equivalents.
This application claims priority to and the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/867,216, filed on Aug. 19, 2013, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING EXTERIOR VEHICLE LIGHTS IN RESPONSE TO FLASHING RED STOP LIGHTS,” the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2131888 | Harris | Oct 1938 | A |
| 2632040 | Rabinow | Mar 1953 | A |
| 2827594 | Rabinow | Mar 1958 | A |
| 3179845 | Kulwiec | Apr 1965 | A |
| 3581276 | Newman | May 1971 | A |
| 3663819 | Hicks et al. | May 1972 | A |
| 4139801 | Linares | Feb 1979 | A |
| 4151526 | Hinachi et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
| 4236099 | Rosenblum | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4258979 | Mahin | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4286308 | Wolff | Aug 1981 | A |
| 4357558 | Massoni et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4376909 | Tagami et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
| 4479173 | Rumpakis | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4599544 | Martin | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4645975 | Meitzler et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4665321 | Chang et al. | May 1987 | A |
| 4692798 | Seko et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4716298 | Etoh | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4727290 | Smith et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4768135 | Kretschmer et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4862037 | Farber et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4891559 | Matsumoto et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4930742 | Schofield et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4934273 | Endriz | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4967319 | Seko | Oct 1990 | A |
| 5008946 | Ando | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5036437 | Macks | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5072154 | Chen | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5086253 | Lawler | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5096287 | Kakinami et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5124549 | Michaels et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5166681 | Bottesch et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5182502 | Slotkowski et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5187383 | Taccetta et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5235178 | Hegyi | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5329206 | Slotkowski et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5347261 | Adell | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5347459 | Greenspan et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5355146 | Chiu et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5379104 | Takao | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5396054 | Krichever et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5402170 | Parulski et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5416318 | Hegyi | May 1995 | A |
| 5426294 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5428464 | Silverbrook | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5430450 | Holmes | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5434407 | Bauer et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5451822 | Bechtel et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5452004 | Roberts | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5471515 | Fossum et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5475441 | Parulski et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5481268 | Higgins | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5483346 | Butzer | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5485155 | Hibino | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5508592 | Lapatovich et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5537003 | Bechtel et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5541724 | Hoashi | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5550677 | Schofield et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5554912 | Thayer et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5574463 | Shirai et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5587929 | League et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5592146 | Kover, Jr. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5614788 | Mullins et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5621460 | Hatlestad et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5660454 | Mori et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5666028 | Bechtel et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5684473 | Hibino et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5707129 | Kobayashi | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5710565 | Shirai et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5714751 | Chen | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5715093 | Schierbeek et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5736816 | Strenke et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5751832 | Panter et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5781105 | Bitar et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5786787 | Eriksson et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5796094 | Schofield et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5798727 | Shirai et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5811888 | Hsieh | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5812321 | Schierbeek et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5835613 | Breed et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5837994 | Stam et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5841126 | Fossum et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5845000 | Breed et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5867214 | Anderson et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5877897 | Schofield et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5905457 | Rashid | May 1999 | A |
| 5912534 | Benedict | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5923027 | Stam et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5942853 | Piscart | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5990469 | Bechtel et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6008486 | Stam et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6018308 | Shirai | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6049171 | Stam et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6097023 | Schofield et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6102546 | Carter | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6130421 | Bechtel et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6130448 | Bauer et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6140933 | Bugno et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6144158 | Beam | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6166698 | Turnbull et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6184781 | Ramakesavan | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6255639 | Stam et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6281632 | Stam et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6329925 | Skiver et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6349782 | Sekiya et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6356376 | Tonar et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6379013 | Bechtel et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6396040 | Hill | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6396397 | Bos et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6403942 | Stam | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6429594 | Stam et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6442465 | Breed et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
| 6443602 | Tanabe et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6465962 | Fu et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6469739 | Bechtel et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6483438 | DeLine et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6491416 | Strazzanti | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6507779 | Breed et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6550943 | Strazzanti | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6553130 | Lemelson et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6558026 | Strazzanti | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6559435 | Schofield et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6587573 | Stam et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6593698 | Stam et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6611610 | Stam et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6617564 | Ockerse et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6631316 | Stam et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6677986 | Pöchmüller | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6728393 | Stam et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6772057 | Breed et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6774988 | Stam et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6824281 | Schofield et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6861809 | Stam | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6902307 | Strazzanti | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6913375 | Strazzanti | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6928180 | Stam et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6946978 | Schofield | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6999004 | Comaniciu et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7012543 | Deline et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7038577 | Pawlicki et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7049945 | Breed et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7255465 | Deline et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7262406 | Heslin et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7265342 | Heslin et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7311428 | Deline et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7321112 | Stam et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7365769 | Mager | Apr 2008 | B1 |
| 7417221 | Creswick et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7446650 | Schofield et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7467883 | Deline et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7468651 | Deline et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7526103 | Schofield et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7533998 | Schofield et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7565006 | Stam et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7567291 | Bechtel et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7575348 | Hasegawa | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7653215 | Stam | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7658521 | Deline et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7683326 | Stam et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7708434 | Moizard et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7719408 | Deward et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7720580 | Higgins-Luthman | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7815326 | Blank et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7877175 | Higgins-Luthman | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7881839 | Stam et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7888629 | Heslin et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7914188 | Deline et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7972045 | Schofield | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7994471 | Heslin et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8045760 | Stam et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8063753 | Deline et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8090153 | Schofield et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8100568 | Deline et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8116929 | Higgins-Luthman | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8120652 | Bechtel et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8142059 | Higgins-Luthman et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8162518 | Schofield | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8203443 | Bos et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8217830 | Lynam | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8222588 | Schofield et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8258433 | Byers et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8289142 | Pawlicki et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8289430 | Bechtel et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8325028 | Schofield et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8492698 | Schofield et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8543254 | Schut et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
| 8718899 | Schwindt et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 20020040962 | Schofield | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20030202357 | Strazzanti | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040143380 | Stam | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040145905 | Strazzanti | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20080044062 | Stam | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080165028 | Fechner et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080192132 | Bechtel et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080252488 | Bos | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080294315 | Breed | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090010494 | Bechtel | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20110135155 | Kudo | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20120072080 | Jeromin et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120176499 | Winter et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120249795 | Ito | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20130028473 | Hilldore et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130101161 | Faber | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130229520 | Aimura | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130253754 | Ferguson | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20140036080 | Schut | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140132769 | Kido | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140192190 | Takahashi | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140247351 | Murillo Amaya et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2946561 | May 1981 | DE |
| 1504957 | Sep 2005 | EP |
| 2437233 | Apr 2012 | EP |
| 2641237 | Jul 1990 | FR |
| 2726144 | Apr 1996 | FR |
| 2313973 | Dec 1997 | GB |
| 5744541 | Mar 1982 | JP |
| 6015237 | Jan 1985 | JP |
| 62131837 | Jun 1987 | JP |
| 01233129 | Sep 1989 | JP |
| 5139203 | Jun 1993 | JP |
| 5342901 | Dec 1993 | JP |
| 06151067 | May 1994 | JP |
| 06267304 | Sep 1994 | JP |
| 6276524 | Sep 1994 | JP |
| 6295601 | Oct 1994 | JP |
| 6321007 | Nov 1994 | JP |
| 732936 | Feb 1995 | JP |
| 747878 | Feb 1995 | JP |
| 7052706 | Feb 1995 | JP |
| 769125 | Mar 1995 | JP |
| 8166221 | Jun 1996 | JP |
| 08221700 | Aug 1996 | JP |
| 2010020483 | Jan 2010 | JP |
| 8605147 | Sep 1986 | WO |
| 9735743 | Oct 1997 | WO |
| 9843850 | Oct 1998 | WO |
| 9947396 | Oct 1999 | WO |
| 0022881 | Apr 2000 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Christopher M. Kormanyos, “SAE Paper No. 980003 entitled “HID System with Adaptive Vertical AIM Control”,” p. 13-18. |
| J.P. Lowenau et al, “SAE Paper No. 980007 entitled “Adaptive Light Control—A New Light Concept Controlled by Vehicle Dynamics and Navigation”,” p. 33-38. |
| Franz-Josef Kalze, “SAE Paper No. 980005 entitled “Xenon Light for Main and Dipped Beam”,” p. 23-26. |
| Tohru Shimizu et al, (SAE Paper No. 980322 entitled “Development of PWM DRL with Low RF Emissions and Low Heat”, p. 113-117. |
| International Searching Authority, Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Search Report and Written Opinion, Sep. 12, 2013, 6 pages. |
| International Searching Authority, Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Search Report and Written Opinion, Dec. 25, 2014, 6 pages. |
| JP Abstract of Patent No. 60-015237, “Headlight Device,” (Jan. 25, 1985). |
| JP Abstract of Patent No. 01233129 A, “Optical Axis Changing Device for Illuminating Lamp,” (Sep. 18, 1989). |
| JP Abstract of Patent No. 5342901, “Projection headlamp for vehicles,” p. 1. |
| JP Abstract for Patent No. 6321007, “Vehicular Dazzle Sensor,” p. 1. |
| JP Abstract of Patent No. 08221700 A, “Stop Lamp Recognition Device,” p. 1. |
| JP Abstract of Publication No. 2010-020483, “Vehicle Detection Device, Vehicle Detection Program and Light Controller,” p. 1. |
| International Searching Authority, Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Search Report and Written Opinion, Nov. 20, 2014, 6 pages. |
| Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Searching Authority, International Search Report, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority and Notification of Transmittal, Nov. 20, 2014, 6 Pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20150049197 A1 | Feb 2015 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61867216 | Aug 2013 | US |