This patent application is a national stage filing under 35 U.S.C. 371 of International Application No. PCT/EP2008/005065, filed 24 Jun. 2008, and claims priority to German Patent Application No. 10 2007 033 177.2, filed 17 Jul. 2007, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The invention relates to a coolant cooler for motor vehicles having a soldered cooling network composed of flat pipes and of ribs, manufactured from very thin sheets of aluminum and having collector or deflector boxes, arranged at the ends of the flat pipes, for the coolant which flows in the flat pipes and which is cooled by means of cooling air, which flows through the ribs.
The coolant cooler described at the beginning is the standard which has applied for years for such heat exchangers. The intention is that the invention described below will not basically change this standard rather optimize it in many respects.
Compact heat exchangers composed of flat pipes and louver-type lamellas are known from the prior art for cooling drive trains of vehicles having internal combustion engines. These are capable of achieving extremely high cooling capacity in an extremely small installation space. The objective of the optimization is not only to achieve a high volume-related power density but also minimum pressure loss on the coolant side and a low weight. At the same time, for reasons of strength, in particular owing to thermomechanical stresses and due to the stresses of the cooling network from pressure from the cooling system of the vehicle, the minimum wall thicknesses, in particular of the flat pipes, have to be selected such that they do not significantly counteract the other objectives, for example of reducing weight and achieving the smallest possible cross-sectional constrictions on the coolant side and on the cooling air side (compactness) accompanied by a low pressure loss. In the prior art, the flat pipes often have no internal supports, or only 1 to 2 internal supports. The pipe heights are in the range from 1.3 mm to 2.0 mm. For reasons of strength and corrosion, wall thicknesses of more than 0.20 mm are used at present. Inter alia the hydraulic diameter (4×area over which the flow passes/wetted area) is a characteristic variable for the hydraulic behavior. With the aforesaid parameters for the pipes without an internal insert, hydraulic diameters of 1.3 mm to 3.0 mm typically occur on the coolant side. Together with the lamellas with typical heights of 5.1 mm to 9.5 mm and wall thicknesses in the range of 60 μm to 120 μm a constriction factor (ratio of area flowed through to end area) results in the range from 0.05 to 0.28.
It is also known that internal inserts can be used to significantly improve the ability of the flat pipes to withstand internal pressure and thermomechanical loading. The problem is however that in flat pipes with internal inserts the hydraulic diameter is usually significantly smaller than in flat pipes without internal inserts, as a result of which the pressure loss rises.
A coolant cooler which, apart from one feature, has all the other features of the preamble of claim 1, is known from U.S. Pat. No. 4,332,293. The flat pipes there are composed of brass and the ribs of copper. This coolant cooler is therefore too heavy and too difficult. The same applies to the coolant cooler which is known from U.S. Pat. No. 5,329,988. A further coolant cooler is known from U.S. Pat. No. 4,693,307. In said document a solution is presented which limits the cooling air-side pressure loss through a special embodiment of the ribs.
The embodiment of the flat pipes used in coolant coolers does not seem to have been of particular interest until now because in the sources quoted flat pipes have been shown and described without any particular features.
The object of the invention is to make available a cost-effective coolant cooler for motor vehicles whose properties, such as in particular high thermal transmission power accompanied by a comparatively low weight, will be compatible with the future requirements of users in many respects.
The inventive solution of the problem is obtained in a coolant cooler embodied according to the preamble of claim by virtue of its configuration with the characterizing features of said claim.
Each flat pipe is composed of at least two shaped sheet metal strips, wherein at least one of the sheet metal strips forms the wall of the flat pipe and another sheet metal strip constitutes a corrugated internal insert, forming ducts, therein. The ratio of the constriction factor on the coolant side to the constriction factor on the cooling air side is approximately in the range between 0.20 and 0.44. The hydraulic diameter on the coolant side is approximately in the range between 0.8 and 1.5 mm. The inventors have found that a coolant cooler which is equipped with these features has an acceptable pressure loss accompanied by an excellent heat transmission capacity. The power per unit of weight which is achieved is particularly advantageous, that is to say the coolant cooler has a significantly lower weight. The internal insert ensures a correspondingly high level of resistance, in particular to internal pressure.
According to one advantageous development there is provision for each flat pipe to be composed of three shaped sheet metal strips, wherein two sheet metal strips form the wall of the flat pipe, and the third sheet metal strip constitutes the corrugated internal insert, forming ducts, in the same. There is specifically provision for the wall thickness of the flat pipe to be in the range of 0.10-0.20 mm. The thickness of the internal insert is in the range of 0.03-0.10 mm. Because the internal insert can be manufactured from relatively thin sheet steel, the possibility of reducing weight without adversely affecting the strength is enhanced.
On the coolant side, the constriction factor is in a range between 0.15 and 0.28. On the other hand, on the cooling air side the constriction factor is in a range between 0.63 and 0.76.
The constriction factor is calculated as a ratio of the area flowed through to the entire end area F of the respective media side.
The hydraulic diameter dh is calculated from dh=4×A/U. A is the area flowed through. U is the wetted area of the area flowed through. Further features can be found in the dependent claims.
An exemplary embodiment of the invention will be described below with reference to the appended drawings. This description contains further features and their advantages which may possibly prove to be significant later.
In
In
In
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2007 033 177 | Jul 2007 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2008/005065 | 6/24/2008 | WO | 00 | 4/26/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/010155 | 1/22/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3232343 | Lindstrand et al. | Feb 1966 | A |
4693307 | Scarselletta | Sep 1987 | A |
20050045314 | Elbourini | Mar 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3020424 | Nov 1981 | DE |
10060104 | Jun 2001 | DE |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report, PCT/EP2008/005065, Sep. 15, 2008. |
PCT/EP2008/005065 Written Opinion dated Feb. 18, 2010. |
Chinese Office Action (Translation) for Application No. 200880025070.5, Nov. 29, 2010 (2 pages). |
Search Report from the European Patent Office for Application No. 08759324.0 dated Mar. 24, 2010 (Original, 3 pages). |
Second Office Action from the State Intellectual Property Office of China for Application No. 200880025070.5 dated Jul. 19, 2011 (English Translation—7 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100218926 A1 | Sep 2010 | US |