The present invention relates to a steering system realized according to the preamble of the attached independent claim.
The present invention concerns a new type of steering and a new steering system that can assist the driver in driving a vehicle.
Although the degree of automation and hence of self-driving of the state-of-the-art vehicles is growing, for safety reasons, the presence of human action is required to ensure driving safety. And also, but not only, under certain conditions of poor visibility of the constraints (lane lines, obstacles, other cars or guard rails) for example in the event of fog, both automatic action and human action are required to be present. In addition, the presence of a force feedback that acts directly on the steering, can be useful to compensate for visual feedback when it is limited or absent. The sensors see where the driver sometimes fails (for example in case of fog or rain or other or because the attention of the driver is lowering or in case of distraction) and vice versa (for example obstacles in the blind corner of the cameras installed on the vehicle or in the case where for example the lane lines are not clearly visible to the sensors or the rail guard is absent or in the presence of road construction sites).
Furthermore, if automation is overused, the driver may be less aware of what is happening to the vehicle, he is obliged to monitor it more and for this reason he may get tired, or if he relies too much on automation, he may not be ready to regain control in case of need, or, on the contrary, he may be wary of it.
For all these reasons, the present invention aims at achieving a “collaboration” between automatic action and human action, whilst the state of the art provides that the one excludes the other, in the sense that the intervention of the driver (who accelerates or brakes or if he intervenes on the steering with a sufficient torque for a lane change) while the automatic system is in operation, usually temporarily deactivates the automatic system itself. In the present invention, when choosing to select one of the modes of driving aid, the two playing protagonists (driver and aid) collaborate (either always or only when necessary, that is, when the sole action of the driver is not sufficient to perform the task) and the input used to command the actual steering on the axle of the wheels is composed of the inputs of both players.
In addition, on the autonomous driving systems currently on the market, the state of the art provides that the force feedback felt on the steering has the same direction as what would be needed to perform the task (for example, obstacle on the left, the automation rotates the steering wheel to the right) and therefore the driver must follow and trust it, but this could not only make him feel “excluded” by feeling less authority in the control over the vehicle, but it also could pose a problem: there is a risk that the result of the action commanding the actual steering on the axle of the wheel is to move towards the obstacle if, for example, having limited visibility and/or under particular stress conditions, the driver should not trust the aid or in any case if he should follow his instinct to oppose to the input of the aid. In fact, as described within the document Schmidt, A., Lee, D., Motor Control and Learning, A behavioral Emphasis, 4th Ed., Human Kynetics, 2005, the human being tends to oppose with a very small latency of 30-50 ms to sudden changes in the position of a limb with an action (called stretch reflex) that unconsciously tends to bring the limb into the initial position before the disturbance, without involving the stages of information processing; in fact, 150-200 ms are necessary for the information to be consciously processed by the stages of information processing.
For these further reasons it is thought that, while the state of the art provides for a rotation of the steering in the same direction as the desired steering, in the present invention it is provided for a rotation of the steering in the opposite direction, having in mind that the driver by unconsciously opposing to the action of the aid, in the end steers the car in an unconscious manner in the right direction in order, for example, to avoid an obstacle. Even though, for safety, this rotation is not considered on the axle of the wheels where an electric motor is actuated which steers safely in the direction, for example, for moving the vehicle away from the obstacle to be avoided.
To achieve these objectives, the present invention provides a steering system in accordance with the characterizing part of the independent claim appended to the present patent application.
In particular, the system object of the present invention uses a new type of steering and, in the steering box and depending on the type of vehicle (with mechanical or electronic/electric connection) between steering and steering box, an epicyclic toothed wheel or an actuator commanded by a computer that serves both to take account of the inputs (aid and driver) and to ensure that the final steering is harmonious.
As far as the steering is concerned: this has a different conformation from the one currently on the market. In particular, both the steering wheel and the aid acting on the rack of the axle of the wheels, consist of two parts: one commanded by the driver, the other by the obstacle sensors (infrared, ultrasonic, or radar or equivalents) or any other task that it is wished to perform.
As anticipated and as will be described later, the star wheel tends to rotate in the “opposite” direction with respect to the ideal rotation of the steering member to perform a certain task by the driver.
During the operation of the vehicle, the star wheel is then oriented and rotated in the direction of the reference points identified by the sensors.
For example, in case the driver has to dodge an obstacle (reference point) on the right with respect to the vehicle, the star wheel will be oriented and rotated to the right, i.e., in a clockwise direction, so that the driver instinctively rotates the command member in the opposite direction with respect to the rotation of the star wheel.
Steering side, the sensors are connected to a servo and/or to a gear and/or to an electric motor that rotates the star wheel “towards” the object (for example, an obstacle or the side line for holding the lane, or the virtual centre line of the lane for it to be followed by the vehicle) when this is detected at a distance (in absolute value) less than a certain value (which will be called activation value for example at 1.5 m or even less or more depending on the task) or in any case when it can be seen from a prediction calculation through a mathematical model of the vehicle that the action of the driver alone is not sufficient to perform the task. In detail, sensors could be positioned at the corners of the car (or in any other position depending on the task). When they detect the object (in real time or in a “future” time in the sense of predicting a “future” distance between vehicle and object) at a distance in absolute value lower/higher (depending on the task) than the activation value, an electric circuit is powered that actuates the star wheel. This rotation will be “opposite” to the one needed because it has been shown that instinctively the human being tends to oppose to sudden movements, as previously described.
On the side of the axle of the wheels, something similar happens with the sensors that actuate an “aid” that acts on the axle of the wheels. In this case, for safety reasons, the rotation imposed on the car through the axle of the wheels, will be in the direction that leads the car to move away from the object (in case this is an obstacle to be avoided) or to approach the object (in case this is an objective to be reached).
Steering side, due to the non-synchronous rotation of the two parts of the steering (the star wheel will move with respect to the steering grabbed by the driver), a cover of the “area” of the steering in plexiglass or similar material will be used for safety and also to allow the driver to see the dashboard display. Seeing and/or sensory sensing (depending on the driving mode set) the movement of the star wheel will indirectly help the driver to perform the task (for example to avoid obstacles or follow a determined road or lane).
In particular, the presence of a cover element of the steering member made of transparent material, such as plexiglass or the like, is envisaged.
Said cover element in transparent material is mounted integral with the steering member, so that an action by the user on the cover element allows the steering member to be moved, for steering the wheels.
The presence of the cover element in transparent material is a particularly important aspect, since the star wheel is located inside the steering member and the cover element allows the user (the driver) to view the star wheel and, consequently, its movement.
It follows that the user will not have any part of the body, and in particular of the hands, in contact with the star wheel, but he will have visual feedback thereof and will tend, as also described later, to oppose to the rotation movement of the steering member with respect to the rotation movement of the star wheel.
As will be described later through the illustration of some embodiment examples, the driver will also have haptic feedback in the event that the star wheel is mechanically connected to the steering member: in this case, the movement of the star wheel will be transmitted to the steering member (and to the possible cover element in transparent material) and, consequently, the user will also have haptic feedback.
These and further objects of the present invention are achieved by a bottling system according to the appended independent claim and the sub-claims.
Optional features of the system of the invention are contained in the appended dependent claims, which form an integral part of the present disclosure.
What is described is detailed through figures to better understand the disclosed advantages and features of the invention. Such figures are for illustrative purposes only without limiting the present invention in any way.
The driving modes that can be set are 5:
A) INDIRECT (BASIC) AID: the driving aid is only visual, due to the fact that the driver sees the steering star wheel move, through the plexiglass or similar material, as a function of the proximity of the object on one of the two sides of the vehicle, but actually, the axle of the wheels is commanded only by the driver.
Even if one has only one visual feedback in this case, that feedback can help the driver to perform the task.
B) DEVIOUS or HIDDEN AID: when rotating, the star wheel, it is like if it moved the “neutral point” of the steering and therefore the overall steering is given by the combination of the two steerings: the one set by the driver and the one set by the sensors.
C) IMPULSIVE APPARENT AID: the sensors give an impulse to the star wheel that, in this case, is made integral with the steering for a few instants or seconds and then the driver will perceive the steering move from the torque CR. But this movement is as if it were not transmitted to the axle of the wheels because also the opposite movement is transmitted to the axle (or in any case with a little higher absolute value) and therefore, de facto, the axle of the wheels is commanded initially substantially only by the driver, and then by the driver and by the Aid (the star wheel continues to turn, but the wheels are only affected by CD and CA).
D) CLEAR and IMPULSIVE AID: the sensors give a pulse and simultaneously move the neutral point of the steering. In practice, the star wheel and the steering are always integral but the torque CA is always added up and therefore CR and CA, if they are equal, cancel each other out and therefore, de facto, the axle of the wheels is substantially commanded only by the torque CD.
E) NO AID: even in the presence of objects, no aid is applied to driving, not even the visual one. The star wheel is in its neutral position and, through the plexiglass or similar material, the driver cannot see it move, if not together with the steering; even the axle of the wheels is commanded only by the driver.
Note that the amount of torque applied to the star wheel/axle of the wheels starting from the input received from the sensors, can be varied proportionally with respect to the distance of the object, for example, through a potentiometer that produces a greater torque when the distance from the object is smaller.
In addition, the amount of torque applied to the star wheel/axle of the wheels starting from the input received from the sensors is scaled or amplified based on the philosophy it is intended to be adopted with respect to the percentage of aid to be provided to the driver. The suggestion is to make sure that the driver gives most of the input needed to perform his task or in any case that the driver is not completely excluded.
In the Drive By Wire version (
Obviously in this type of connection the use of the classic power steering is not necessary and, on the contrary, an artificial force feedback must be considered to guarantee the driver a certain awareness while driving.
A control unit or a computer (11) will be instead used to appropriately combine, depending on the various driving modes, the torsional torque CD imposed by the driver on the column (1) with the torque CA produced by the aid (3) starting from the sensors (9). In particular, the control unit or the computer (11) will have the task of:
A mechanical block (23) must be positioned in such a way that, even when the star wheel (10) and the steering column (1) are decoupled, the coupling between the Clutch (17) and the gear (24) of the steering column (1) remains.
The electric circuit of the Clutch (4) that actuates the clutch device (17) (
In mode C (the first instants or seconds) and D, the electric motor (2) that actuates the pinion of the star wheel (22) and hence the star wheel (10) is also powered and the result is that the movement of the star wheel is perceived haptically as well as seen by the driver.
This type of version (DBW) can also be applied to video games using the same steering/star wheel configuration and considering all the rest “virtual” (the vehicle with a mathematical model, real time and/or future objects and distances, axle of the wheels and input of the axle of the wheels, etc.). Also in this case, when the criteria on the distances detected by the virtual sensors are met and depending on the driving mode, the input is considered to be the torque provided by the driver (13) which is added or in any case combined with the torque produced by the aid (3) and which provides as output a virtual torque that acts on the virtual rack of the axle of the wheels.
The system object of the present invention can be easily applied both to the world of video games and to the world of augmented reality.
As anticipated, in case of application to video games, a real steering wheel and a real internal star wheel are used. In this case the sensors measure virtual distances: the vehicle, the environment, the axle of the wheels and the input of the axle of the wheels, etc. are also simulated.
In case of augmented reality, the whole system works using real or at most calculated distances/sensors through mathematical models and a prediction.
In the Mechanical version (
In this case, the classic electric power steering system (6) will be used: a control unit (5) that feeds itself with the inputs of the various sensors (9) (for example the vehicle speed, the steering torque (13), the steering angle and speed sensor, the number of engine revolutions, etc.) and, starting from the various characteristic bends stored in its inside, detects the torque required for power-assistance and activates the electric power steering motor (6).
Obviously, in
It should also be noted that in
The same applies to the existing coupling between electric motor (2) and pinion of the star wheel (22) and therefore star wheel (10), which can be made either directly or indirectly (toothed wheel integral with the star wheel (10)), depending on the space available for housing the electric motor (2), without however compromising the applicability of this patent.
The operation of mode B will be described below:
The sensors (9) described above are connected, in addition to the pinion of the star wheel (22) and hence to the star wheel (10) (as was said in common in the two DBW/Mechanics versions), also to a second pinion that indirectly acts on the rack of the axle of the wheels (21). Basically, when for example the obstacle to be avoided is close enough on the left of the car, the electric motor (3) will rotate the Ring (18) clockwise. The driver, by acting through the steering (14)/column (1), will rotate the Sun (15) directly. The result will be a “sum” rotation (or in any case a combination between the two) imposed on the train carrier (20) integral with the second pinion (7) that will turn the trajectory of the car to the right.
Steering side, the sensors (9) will actuate through an electric motor (2) the pinion of the star wheel (22) and hence the star wheel (10) in the opposite direction and therefore with a rotation that would make the car move towards the obstacle. In our example (obstacle on the left), it will rotate the star wheel counter-clockwise (the star wheel will rotate clockwise if the obstacle is detected by the right ultrasonic sensor).
It should therefore be noted that the rotation of the star wheel (10) and of the Ring (18), for the same position of the obstacle/road line, have an opposite direction.
In this mode, the driver will perceive on the steering the feedback substantially due to the power steering (6) that relieves his effort, possibly algebraically added or in any case combined with the torque generated indirectly on the second pinion (7) by the aid (3).
A) It is like B but without aid (3) (not powered in this mode). In practice there will only be a visual aid and no aid (3) intervention on the rack of the axle of the wheels (21). In this case, the driver will perceive on the steering the feedback substantially due to the power steering (6) which relieves his effort and no additional feedback due to the sensors (9), but such feedback, even if only visual, can help the driver to perform the task.
E) It is like A but without even the visual aid: the circuit of the Clutch (4) that actuates the clutch device (17) (see
C) Additionally, compared to mode B there is the fact that the star wheel (10), for example through an electromagnet or the Clutch (17) of
D) As long as this mode is selected, the coupling between star wheel (10) and steering (14) is maintained and therefore all the considerations that were made in the previous case are valid, that is, like in the first instants or seconds of the mode C above, in which star wheel (10) and steering (14) are integral. In this case, the driver will perceive for as long as this mode is selected, the feedback of the star wheel on the steering, (the input of the control unit (5) will only be that of the driver (13), if CR and CA cancel each other out), in addition to the feedback due to the power steering (6) that relieves his effort.
While in the DBW version (and even more so in the video game version) one conveniently adds the two torques (CD and CA) through the control unit/computer (11) if and when one wishes so (depending on the driving mode selected), in the mechanical version it is to be considered, in the case of an epicyclic gear train (8), that a different output of the train carrier (20) is produced depending on whether the Ring (18) is stationary or in motion.
In fact:
The activation/deactivation of the 5 driving modes can be done through the keys that will act as a switch closing/opening the different circuits that are powered or not, depending on the mode chosen:
Note that in both versions (including the video game version), (100) (
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102021000021383 | Aug 2021 | IT | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2022/057307 | 8/5/2022 | WO |