The present disclosure relates to vehicle structural frames and impact mitigation.
Conventional vehicles include crash mitigation structure to reduce/manage deformation in the event of impact. Frontal impacts are, however, not always completely flush to the front end of the vehicle. At times an object or barrier can collide with the vehicle off-center. For example, one type of an off-centered vehicle impact is the overlap barrier impact defined as an impact spanning (or “overlapping”) approximately less than 25% of the vehicle front end on one side. An overlap barrier impact may occur, e.g., during an oblique vehicle-to-vehicle or head-on tree/post/pole impact.
With respect to the overlap barrier impact, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) is defining a new frontal impact crash mode protocol. It is expected that the protocol will require a vehicle to be impacted at 40 mph against a 25% overlap barrier. In order to meet this standard various structural designs have been considered. For example, one existing reference teaches a retractable strut pivotally connected to the inside of a side rail in the front-end assembly. See U.S. Pat. No. 3,853,344 titled “Impact Absorbing Bumper System.” While this reference teaches a design that translates impact energy from one position on the front end of a vehicle to another, it does not appear to mitigate overlap barrier impact as the retractable strut is mounted inside of the side rail.
Therefore, it is desirable to have a vehicle structural frame with an overlap-barrier-impact deformation scheme that mitigates partial overlap barrier impact. It is further desirable to have a method of manufacturing the same.
The present disclosure addresses one or more of the above-mentioned issues. Other features and/or advantages will become apparent from the description which follows.
One exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure relates to a vehicle structural frame with a partial-overlap-barrier-impact deformation scheme, the frame has: a rail defining a first longitudinal axis; a first energy absorption device defining a second longitudinal axis outside of the first longitudinal axis with respect to a vehicle; and a connector extending between the rail and the first energy absorption device.
Another exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure relates to a vehicle structural frame with a partial-overlap-barrier-impact deformation scheme, the frame includes: an engine cradle having a first rail extending in a longitudinal direction and a second rail extending in a vertical direction; and a blocker assembly connecting the first rail and second rail, the blocker assembly configured to resist rotation of the second rail in the vertical direction given application of a force in the longitudinal direction.
Additionally, another exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure relates to a method of manufacturing a vehicle structural frame with a partial-overlap-barrier-impact deformation scheme, the method including: attaching a first energy absorption device to a side rail at a position outside of the side rail with respect to a vehicle.
One advantage of the present disclosure is that a predetermined engagement between an object or barrier and the vehicle frame is enabled. The exemplary illustrated vehicle structural frames foster energy absorption in the underbody and assist in maintaining the structural integrity of the front vehicle frame. A 50% reduction in deformation on the front vehicle frame was measured using one configuration. Steering displacement was also significantly reduced. Impacts that overlap approximately 25% or less of the width of the vehicle are managed.
Another advantage of the exemplary vehicle structural frames is that they can be implemented on existing vehicles with minimal design changes. Pre-existing rails are part of the deformation scheme or lower load path, and with the disclosed structural frames, the rails are able to more fully engage a partial overlap barrier and absorb impact energy.
The present invention will be explained in greater detail below by way of example with reference to the figures, in which the same reference numbers are used in the figures for identical or essentially identical elements. The above features and the other features and advantages of the present teachings are readily apparent from the following detailed description of the best modes for carrying out the invention when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.
Referring to the drawings, wherein like characters represent examples of the same or corresponding parts throughout the several views, there is shown exemplary vehicle support frames having a partial-overlap-barrier-impact deformation scheme that mitigates overlap-barrier impact. The structural frames are configured to tie in impact energy from a far side of a front of the vehicle into a vehicle main (or core) structural frame rails. The structural frames are also configured to reduce rotation of the engine cradle in the event of an impact on a far side of the front of the vehicle.
The structural frame assemblies are configured for implementation on a front-end of a vehicle frame assembly but can also be configured for rear impact. Though the illustrated embodiments are shown incorporated into a sedan, other embodiments of the vehicle structural frame can be included on pickup trucks, vans, minivans, sports utility vehicles, coupes, convertibles, commercial vehicles and all utility vehicles.
Referring now to
Now with reference to
Energy absorption device 110, as shown in
Energy absorption device 120 is aligned with or at least partially nested in rail 50. Energy absorption device 120 is attached to connector 90. Energy absorption device 120 is also attached to cover 140. Connector 90 is attached to rail 50 at 170.
Connectors 80, 90 are shown as plates in the illustrated embodiments. Connectors 80, 90 can be any mechanical link between the energy absorption devices and the structural rails including but not limited to linkages, tubes, or hinges. Additionally, a crush can is but one energy absorption device that can be used with the vehicle structural frames. Energy absorption devices absorb kinetic mechanical energy by compressing or deflecting relatively constant stress over an extended distance with or without rebounding. Other examples include foam structure, honeycomb inserts, springs or struts.
Now with reference to
Blocker assembly 220, as shown in
The illustrated vehicle frames can be manufactured in accordance with an exemplary method of manufacturing. An exemplary method of manufacturing a vehicle structural frame with a partial-overlap-barrier-impact deformation scheme includes: attaching a first energy absorption device (e.g., 110 or 120 as shown in
The method of manufacture can include manufacturing a vehicle structural frame with engine cradle, e.g., 240 as shown in
Components in the illustrated vehicle structural frames can be composed of any material including, for example, aluminum, steel or magnesium. Each component can be manufactured using different manufacturing techniques, e.g., stamping, extrusion or welding.
Those familiar with the art to which this invention relates will recognize various alternative designs and embodiments for practicing the invention within the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3853344 | Shimoe | Dec 1974 | A |
6299210 | Ruehl | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6705653 | Gotanda et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
7267736 | Hou | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7469956 | Yasuhara et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7533913 | Bae | May 2009 | B2 |
8002338 | Yasuhara et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8020907 | Wibbeke et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8215705 | Gonin | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8235433 | Gonin | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8256831 | Abe et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8276955 | Baccouche et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8308207 | Fang et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8348333 | Iammarino et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
20020170766 | Gantz et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20060032895 | Durand et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070215402 | Sasaki et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080054655 | Kizaki | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090188206 | Stol et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100026047 | Baccouche et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100194145 | Akaki et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100259033 | Okabe et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110018248 | Cordea | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110095568 | Terada et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110121587 | Handing | May 2011 | A1 |
20110133512 | Mildner et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120007373 | Boettcher et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120025546 | Haneda | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120086225 | Matsuura et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120187720 | Tomozawa et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120248820 | Yasui et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130207417 | Kihara et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2005022564 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2008162344 | Jul 2008 | JP |
WO2009094090 | Dec 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Hak-Sung Kim, Torque Transmission Characteristics of the Press Fit Joint Between the Aluminum Shaft and Steel Right with Small Teeth, Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines, Jan. 28, 2011, vol. 39, Issue 1, http://www.tandfoline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15397734.538655. |
Kenneth Kremer, Metal Foams for Improved Crash Energy Absorption in Passenger Equipment, Sep. 1, 2004, http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/archive/studies/idea/finalreports/highspeedrail/hsr-34final—report.pdf. |
Priya Prasad, Design of Vehicle Structures for Crash Energy Management, http://www.google.co.in/url? sa=t&rct=j&q=design%20of%20vehicle%20structures%20for%20crash%20energy% 20management&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CDsQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fweb.iitd.ac.in%2F—achawla% 2Fpublic—html%2F736%2F7-Design—of—Vehicle—Structures—for—crash—energy—management—v5.pdf&ei=VjRjT6btlMn3rQfW0vC8Bw&usg=AFQjCNHw—X6XhQmISNh-XobkZ9A2R17g9g&cad=rja, 2004. |
Chris Sherwood, An Update on the IIHS Small Overlap Research Program, www.iihs.org, 2012 Government/Industry Meeting Washington, DC, Jan. 25, 2012. |