This application is a 35 U.S.C. § 371 national phase of PCT International Application No. PCT/EP2018/064762, filed Jun. 5, 2018, which claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 to European Patent Application No. 17175128.2, filed Jun. 9, 2017, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
The present disclosure relates to a vehicle environment detection system adapted to be mounted in an ego vehicle and including at least one vehicle environment sensor arrangement and a main control unit. The vehicle environment detection system is arranged to detect and track at least one oncoming vehicle.
Today, vehicle environment detection systems, such as for example camera systems, Doppler radar systems and Lidar (Light Detection and Ranging) systems, can be mounted on a vehicle in order to detect objects in order to implement automated vehicle systems such as speed control and collision prevention.
Radar systems are arranged to produce output including a series of reflection points as measured by radar sensors. These reflection points can be treated as separate detections or grouped as tracked objects, providing a common motion state for an extended object.
There are previously known vehicle occupant safety systems which detect side-impacts before the actual crash. In the case that it has been determined that a crash is imminent, vehicle occupants can for example be pushed towards the middle of the car.
To avoid false positives, a sensor used for this purpose has to robustly classify tracks as oncoming or crossing traffic, especially in curves.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,847,792 discloses estimating the risk of an impact of an oncoming vehicle based on the movement amount of a radar reflection point on the oncoming vehicle when the reflection point varies in a vehicle width direction from the left front end toward the right front end of an oncoming vehicle. The acquired data is used for determination of the possibility of collision with an oncoming vehicle, on a curved road or the like.
It is, however, desired to provide a vehicle radar system that is adapted to classify tracks as oncoming or crossing traffic, especially in curves in an accurate, efficient and reliable manner, which also is an object of the present disclosure. In the case of oncoming traffic, it is determined whether an oncoming vehicle will collide with an ego vehicle.
The above expressed object is achieved by a vehicle environment detection system adapted to be mounted in an ego vehicle and including at least one vehicle environment sensor arrangement and a main control unit. The vehicle environment detection system is arranged to detect and track at least one oncoming vehicle, and to determine whether the ego vehicle has entered a curve. When the vehicle environment detection system has determined that the ego vehicle has entered a curve, for each tracked oncoming vehicle, the main control unit is arranged to perform the following steps:
Compare the difference angle with a threshold angle.
The object is also achieved by a method for detecting oncoming vehicles relative an ego vehicle. The method includes the further step of:
When it has been determined that the ego vehicle has entered a curve, for each tracked oncoming vehicle, the method further includes the step of determining a common curve with a radius, along which common curve the ego vehicle is assumed to travel, and determining a measured oncome direction of the tracked oncoming vehicle on the common curve, corresponding to an oncome angle with respect to a predetermined axis.
The method then includes the steps of determining a difference angle between the measured oncome direction and an oncome direction corresponding to if the oncoming vehicle would be moving along the common curve, comparing the difference angle with a threshold angle, and finally determining that the oncoming vehicle is crossing if the difference angle has been determined to exceed the threshold angle.
A number of advantages are obtained by the present disclosure. Mainly, a vehicle radar system is provided that determines whether an oncoming vehicle will collide with an ego vehicle in an accurate, efficient and reliable manner.
According to some aspects, for each tracked oncoming vehicle that has been determined to be crossing, one or more safety measures is/are applied.
According to some aspects, the main control unit is arranged to calculate the difference angle according to δ=θtrack−α, where θtrack is the oncome angle and α is a calculated oncome angle corresponding to if the oncoming vehicle would be moving along the common curve. The main control unit is arranged to calculate the calculated oncome angle according to:
where D is a position between a reference point with respect to the ego vehicle and detected oncoming position, which both are adjusted to be positioned on the common curve. γėgo is an angular rotational velocity around the reference point, and v is an ego vehicle velocity.
According to some aspects, when the vehicle environment detection system has determined that the ego vehicle has entered a curve, the main control unit is arranged to increase the threshold angle stepwise from a first threshold angle to a second threshold angle. This is performed in a in a step-wise manner according to:
where tcyc is the time for each measurement cycle (in a preferred embodiment—a radar cycle), i is an increasing step index indicating that the current value always is calculated based on the value of the last cycle, and γėgo is an angular rotational velocity for the ego vehicle. The second threshold angle exceeds the first threshold angle.
In this manner, the reliability of the vehicle environment detection system is increased.
According to some aspects, when the vehicle environment detection system has determined that the ego vehicle has left the curve, the threshold angle is step-wise reduced to the first threshold angle.
Other aspects of the present disclosure are disclosed in this disclosure.
The present disclosure will now be described more in detail with reference to the appended drawings, where:
The reflected signals 7 correspond to radar detections, where the main control unit 8 includes a tracking function that is arranged to group these radar detections as tracked objects, providing a common motion state for an extended detected object.
The ego vehicle 1 has a center of mass 10 and an angular rotational velocity γėgo go around the center of mass 10, and the radar sensor arrangements 4 has a certain relation to the center of mass 10. In order to detect an ego direction angle γėgo, that corresponds to the ego direction F, and the corresponding rotational velocity γėgo, a yaw sensor device 20 is connected to the main control unit 8.
The radar sensor arrangement is positioned in the origin of a corresponding coordinate system 11, and is positioned at a distance ysen along a y-axis of the coordinate system 11 from the center of mass 10, and at a distance xsen along an x-axis of the coordinate system 11 from the center of mass 10.
With reference also to
where vrelx, vrely is the detected relative velocity of the oncoming vehicle 9, vegoX is the movement of the radar sensor arrangement 4 resulting from the center of mass 10 of the ego vehicle 1, ysen·γėgo, xsen·γėgo is the movement of the radar sensor arrangement 4 resulting from a rotational movement around the center of mass 10.
The oncoming vehicle 9 has a detected oncoming position 14 and a measured oncome direction 13 according to an oncome angle θtrack with respect to the x-axis, which oncome angle θtrack is calculated as:
In
According to the present disclosure, the main control unit 8 is arranged to determine whether the ego vehicle 1 travels in a curve 17 by detecting if the angular rotational velocity γėgo exceeds a certain threshold, according to some aspects 2 deg/s. If that is the case, the main control unit 8 is arranged to determine a calculated oncome direction 13′ that the oncoming vehicle 9 would have if it is moving along the common curve 12. The calculated oncome direction 13′ corresponds to a direction the ego vehicle 1 would follow when it had travelled to the position of the oncoming vehicle 9 along the common curve 12. The calculated oncome direction 13′ has a certain calculated oncome angle α relative the ego direction F″ in the position of the oncoming vehicle 9, and the calculated oncome angle α is thus the angle that the ego direction F would be shifted when the ego vehicle 1 has travelled to the position of the oncoming vehicle 9 along the common curve 12.
The main control unit 8 is then arranged to calculate a difference angle δ between the measured oncome direction 13 and the calculated oncome direction 13′ such that it can be established how much the oncome direction 13 differ from the calculated oncome direction 13′ that corresponds to if the oncoming vehicle is moving on the same common curve 12 as the ego vehicle 1. The difference angle δ thus constitutes a difference between the oncome θtrack and the calculated oncome angle α. If the difference angle δ exceeds a certain threshold angle θmax, the oncoming vehicle 9 is determined to be crossing.
With reference to
For the calculated oncome direction 13′ it is assumed that both vehicles 1, 9 move along the common curve 12. In order to obtain the calculated oncome angle α, a triangle between a common curve middle-point 15, the adjusted detected oncoming position 14′, and the adjusted center of mass 10′ is formed. This triangle is divided into two isosceles 90°-triangles. A distance D between the detected oncoming position 14 and the adjusted center of mass 10 is known and assumed to be the same as a distance between the adjusted detected oncoming position 14′ and the adjusted center of mass 10′; a short side of one 90°-triangle is then D/2.
The common curve radius R is calculated by using the ego vehicle velocity v and the angular rotational velocity γėgo according to:
where trigonometry together with equation (3) yields:
As a result,
In
In
It is thus determined how much the actual measured moving direction of the oncoming vehicle 9 differs from the moving direction corresponding to if the oncoming vehicle 9 would be moving along the common curve 12.
In order to determine whether the oncoming vehicle 9 should be determined to be crossing or not, i.e. whether the difference angle δ exceeds a threshold or not. If the oncoming vehicle 9 is determined to be crossing, suitable safety measure are taken; for example emergency braking, emergency steering and pushing vehicle occupants towards the middle of the ego vehicle 1, suitably by provision of one or more airbags.
According to some aspects, the threshold angle θmax is adaptive, such that in straight driving situations, a first threshold angle θmax1 is used, and in curves a second threshold angle θmax2 is used, where the second threshold angle θmax2 exceeds the first threshold angle θmax1. According to some aspects, the first threshold angle θmax1 is about 35°, and the second threshold angle θmax2 is about 45°.
For this purpose the main control unit 8 is arranged to determine whether the ego vehicle 1 travels in a curve or not by detecting if the angular rotational velocity γėgo exceeds a certain threshold γeg{dot over (o)}max, according to some aspects 2 deg/s, as mentioned previously. According to some aspects, If γėgo≥γeg{dot over (o)}max, the main control unit 8 is arranged to increase the threshold angle θmax stepwise from the first threshold angle θmax1 to the second threshold angle θmax2 in a step-wise manner according to:
where tcyc is the time for each radar cycle, where i is an increasing step index indicating that the current value always is calculated based on the value of the last cycle.
When the main control unit 8 determines that γėgo<γeg{dot over (o)}max, the threshold angle θmax is step-wise reduced to the first threshold angle θmax1.
Each subsequent step-wise change is according to some aspects performed for each subsequent radar cycle.
In this context, a radar cycle is one observation phase during which the vehicle radar system 3 is arranged to acquire data, process the data on several signal processing levels and to send out available results. This can be a fixed time interval, or it can be a dynamic time interval depending on environment conditions and processing load.
With reference to
Step 41: Detecting and tracking at least one oncoming vehicle 9.
Step 42: Determining whether the ego vehicle 1 has entered a curve 17.
When it has been determined that the ego vehicle 1 has entered a curve 17, for each tracked oncoming vehicle 9, the method further includes the steps of:
Step 43: Determining a common curve 12 with a radius R, along which common curve 12 the ego vehicle 1 is assumed to travel.
Step 44: Determining a measured oncome direction 13, 13′ of the tracked oncoming vehicle 9 on the common curve 16, corresponding to an oncome angle θtrack with respect to a predetermined axis x.
Step 45: Determining a difference angle δ between the measured oncome direction 13, 13′ and an oncome direction 13 corresponding to if the oncoming vehicle 9 would be moving along the common curve 12.
Step 46: Comparing the difference angle δ with a threshold angle θmax.
Step 47: Determining that the oncoming vehicle 9 is crossing if the difference angle δ has been determined to exceed the threshold angle θmax.
According to some aspects, for each tracked oncoming vehicle 9 that has been determined to be crossing, the method includes applying one or more safety measures.
The present disclosure is not limited to the examples above, but may vary freely within the scope of the appended claims. For example, the vehicle radar system 3 is provided in a vehicle environment detection system 40. Generally, the present disclosure is related to a vehicle environment detection system 40 arranged for any suitable environment detection technology, for example radar as in the examples above, but also Lidar (Light detection and ranging) and/or image detection are conceivable. According to some aspects, when a yaw sensor device is present, the yaw sensor device 20 is part of the vehicle environment detection system 40.
The vehicle environment detection system 40 generally includes one or more environment detection sensor arrangements 4.
The main control unit 8 includes one or more control unit parts which according to some aspects are combined, adjacent or distributed. One or more of such control unit parts are according to some aspects included as part of the vehicle environment detection system 40.
Instead of center of mass, any suitable reference point on the ego vehicle 1 can be used and adjusted to lie on the common curve 12.
The orientation of the coordinates and the coordinate system may have many suitable configurations, generally there is a predetermined axis with reference to which the ego direction F is determined.
Generally, the present disclosure relates to a vehicle environment detection system 40 adapted to be mounted in an ego vehicle 1 and including at least one vehicle environment sensor arrangement 4 and a main control unit 8, where the vehicle environment detection system 40 is arranged to detect and track at least one oncoming vehicle 9, where the vehicle environment detection system 40 is arranged to determine whether the ego vehicle 1 has entered a curve 17. When the vehicle environment detection system 40 has determined that the ego vehicle 1 has entered a curve 17, for each tracked oncoming vehicle 9, the main control unit 8 is arranged to:
determine a difference angle δ between the measured oncome direction 13, 13′ and an oncome direction 13 corresponding to if the oncoming vehicle 9 would be moving along the common curve 12;
compare the difference angle δ with a threshold angle θmax; and
According to some aspects, for each tracked oncoming vehicle 9 that has been determined to be crossing, the main control unit 8 is arranged to apply one or more safety measures.
According to some aspects, the vehicle environment detection system 40 includes a yaw sensor device 20 that is connected to the main control unit 8 and is arranged to enable the main control unit 8 to determine an ego direction F along which the ego vehicle 1 travels and to determine whether the ego vehicle 1 has entered a curve 17.
According to some aspects, the main control unit 8 is arranged to calculate the difference angle δ according to δ=θtrack−α, where θtrack is the oncome angle and α is a calculated oncome angle corresponding to if the oncoming vehicle 9 would be moving along the common curve 12, where the main control unit 8 is arranged to calculate the calculated oncome angle α according to:
where D is a position between a reference point 10′ with respect to the ego vehicle and detected oncoming position 14′ which both are adjusted to be positioned on the common curve 12, γėgo is an angular rotational velocity γėgo around the reference point 10′, and v is an ego vehicle velocity.
According to some aspects, the reference point 10′ is an adjusted center of mass 10 of the ego vehicle 1, and that the angular rotational velocity γėgo is defined around the center of mass 10.
According to some aspects, when the vehicle environment detection system 40 has determined that the ego vehicle 1 has entered a curve 17, the main control unit 8 is arranged to increase the threshold angle θmax stepwise from a first threshold angle θmax1 to a second threshold angle θmax2 in a step-wise manner according to:
where tcyc is the time for each radar cycle, i is an increasing step index indicating that the current value always is calculated based on the value of the last cycle, γėgo is an angular rotational velocity for the ego vehicle 1, and where the second threshold angle θmax2 exceeds the first threshold angle θmax1.
According to some aspects, when the vehicle environment detection system 40 has determined that the ego vehicle 1 has left the curve 17, the threshold angle θmax is step-wise reduced to the first threshold angle θmax1.
According to some aspects, the vehicle environment detection system 40 includes at least one of a radar system 3, a Lidar (Light Detection and Ranging) system and/or an image detection system.
Generally, the present disclosure also relates to a method for detecting oncoming vehicles relative an ego vehicle 1, where the method includes the steps of:
According to some aspects, for each tracked oncoming vehicle 9 that has been determined to be crossing, the method includes applying one or more safety measures.
According to some aspects, the method includes:
calculating the calculated oncome angle α according to:
According to some aspects, the reference point 10′ is an adjusted center of mass 10 of the ego vehicle 1, and that the angular rotational velocity γėgo is defined around the center of mass 10.
According to some aspects, when it has been determined that the ego vehicle 1 has entered a curve 17, the method includes increasing the threshold angle θmax stepwise from a first threshold angle θmax1 to a second threshold angle θmax2 in a step-wise manner according to:
where tcyc is the time for each radar cycle, i is an increasing step index indicating that the current value always is calculated based on the value of the last cycle, γėgo is an angular rotational velocity for the ego vehicle 1, and where the second threshold angle θmax2 exceeds the first threshold angle θmax1.
According to some aspects, when it has been determined that the ego vehicle 1 has left the curve 17, the method includes step-wise reducing the threshold angle θmax to the first threshold angle θmax1.
While the above description constitutes the preferred embodiment of the present invention, it will be appreciated that the invention is susceptible to modification, variation and change without departing from the proper scope and fair meaning of the accompanying claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
17175128 | Jun 2017 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2018/064762 | 6/5/2018 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/224495 | 12/13/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7885766 | Sugimoto et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8847792 | Tsunekawa | Sep 2014 | B2 |
9436880 | Bos | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9896094 | Nishimura et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
20060111842 | Sugimoto et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20110175767 | Tsunekawa | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20130169449 | Tsunekawa | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20150166062 | Johnson | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20160207534 | Nishimura et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160325753 | Stein | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170039865 | Takabayashi | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20200086919 | Riikonen | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200132833 | Maas | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20210171061 | Etesami | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210271249 | Kobashi | Sep 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102019215147 | Apr 2021 | DE |
0899543 | Mar 1999 | EP |
WO-2018224495 | Dec 2018 | WO |
WO-2018224500 | Dec 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/EP2018/064762 dated Jul. 2, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200198640 A1 | Jun 2020 | US |