Vehicular control system responsive to yaw rate estimation system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10407080
  • Patent Number
    10,407,080
  • Date Filed
    Monday, September 18, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 10, 2019
    5 years ago
Abstract
A yaw rate estimation system for a vehicle includes a camera, a yaw rate sensor, wheel sensors, an accelerometer and a steering sensor. A control includes a processor that estimates the actual yaw rate of the vehicle by processing (i) a first yaw rate derived from yaw rate data provided by the yaw rate sensor, (ii) a second yaw rate derived from wheel sensor data provided by the wheel sensors, (iii) a third yaw rate derived from acceleration data provided by the accelerometer, and (iv) a fourth yaw rate derived from steering data provided by the steering sensor. The vehicular control system utilizes (i) image data captured by the camera as the vehicle is being driven along a road and (ii) the estimated actual yaw rate of the vehicle as the vehicle is being driven along the road.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to a yaw rate determination system for a vehicle.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Sensing yaw rate is important to land-based vehicles, and specifically, to road-going vehicles. Vehicle systems, such as collision avoidance systems, collision mitigation systems and stability control systems, may require accurate values of yaw rate to correctly determine the projected path of vehicle travel. Yaw rate sensors are susceptible to error, and if the measured yaw rate has significant error, then these kinds of vehicle systems may perform poorly or even fail.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides a yaw rate estimation system that is operable to compute or determine an estimated yaw rate using additional vehicle signals and vehicle kinematics to compute the estimated yaw rate (and the system does this without using a forward facing or viewing camera or imager). Because the forward viewing camera is a recipient of the estimated yaw rate, known forward viewing camera yaw rate methods are dependent on this estimation, and thus cannot be used for this estimation. The system of the present invention processes multiple yaw rates derived from different vehicle systems and a yaw rate sensor to determine an estimated yaw rate of the vehicle.


These and other objects, advantages, purposes and features of the present invention will become apparent upon review of the following specification in conjunction with the drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a plan view of a vehicle with a vision system that incorporates cameras in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing processing of the yaw rate inputs to estimate the yaw rate in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing the yaw rate estimation of the present invention, using vehicle kinematic estimations and yaw rate noise filters;



FIG. 4 is a block diagram of estimation of the yaw rate offset in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 5 is a block diagram of estimation of the yaw rate, the yaw rate offset and the yaw rate quality in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 6 shows graphs of the variance for the yaw rate signals derived from three vehicle signals;



FIG. 7 shows graphs showing the offset correction; and



FIG. 8 shows graphs of the yaw rate estimation outputs.





DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Referring now to the drawings and the illustrative embodiments depicted therein, FIG. 1 illustrates a vehicle 10 equipped with the system of the present invention. In this example, the vehicle 10 is a passenger car, but in other examples, the vehicle may be a truck, bus, van, motorcycle, or any other kind of vehicle. In the illustrated embodiment, the equipped vehicle 10 includes a body, a passenger area, wheels 12 (including front wheels 12a and rear wheels 12b), an internal combustion engine and/or an electric motor to drive the vehicle 10, a transmission 14 to convey power from the engine or motor to the wheels 12, a steering wheel 16 to turn the front wheels 12a, as well as other components for powering and controlling the vehicle 10. Clearly, the equipped vehicle may have other systems or components, such as, for example, steering of the rear wheels 12b or the like, without affecting the scope of the present invention.


As shown in FIG. 1, the vehicle 10 further includes a control system 18, a camera 20, a yaw rate sensor 22, a longitudinal accelerometer 24, a transmission sensor 26, a steering angle sensor 28, a speed sensor 30 and a brake sensor 31. The camera 20, yaw rate sensor 22, longitudinal accelerometer 24, transmission sensor 26, steering angle sensor 28, and speed sensor 30 are each connected to the control system 18 to provide sensed information to the control system 18. Such connections may be by way of conductive wires or wireless signals. A bus, such as a Controller-Area Network (CAN) bus or a Local Interconnect Network (LIN) bus or the like, may be used for communication between the sensors and the control system 18. The system may utilize aspects of the systems described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,694,224, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


The yaw rate sensor 22 is operable to sense the left and right yaw rate of the vehicle 10 (in other words, to sense the positive and negative angular rotational velocity of the vehicle about a local vertical axis A of the vehicle). Output of the yaw rate sensor 22 to the control system 18 may comprise a voltage within a range of voltages, or a data message sent over a communications bus or network bus of the vehicle, such as a CAN bus or the like. The yaw rate sensor 22 may include any type of device, such as piezoelectric device, a micromechanical device, a microelectromechanical device, or similar. The longitudinal accelerometer 24 is operable to sense the longitudinal (forward or reverse) acceleration of the vehicle 10 and provide a signal indicative of a magnitude of such acceleration to the control system 18. The longitudinal accelerometer 24 may include any type of device, such as piezoelectric device, a micromechanical device, a microelectromechanical device, or similar. The longitudinal accelerometer 24 may be part of a multi-axis accelerometer.


The system of the present invention provides yaw rate estimation using vehicle signals and statistical analysis techniques. The system provides yaw rate offset correction and noise filtering, and provides robust yaw rate estimation using vehicle signals. The system of the present invention thus improves the resolution of the yaw rate signal and provides fault tolerant yaw rate signals with better quality. Because the signals from individual yaw rate sensors may have poor resolution and offsets, the resolutions and offsets may be out of tolerance for lane keeping features and forward viewing camera applications. The present invention uses multiple yaw rate signals to provide an enhanced estimate of the yaw rate.


The vehicle signals used may include:

    • Wheel speeds for all four wheels (Vfl, Vrl, Vfr, Vrr).
    • Wheel radius and wheel speeds for all four wheels.
    • Yaw Rate Raw from the Yaw Rate Sensor.
    • Yaw Rate Offset from the Yaw Rate Sensor.
    • Lateral Acceleration.
    • Yaw Rate Temperature from the Yaw Rate Sensor.
    • Steering wheel angle, steering wheel rate of change, steering ratio for the entire speed range.
    • Wheel angle.
    • Vehicle stationary, engine running flags.
    • Vehicle driving straight flags.
    • Vehicle velocity.


The yaw rates may be estimated from the following equations, where YawRate_1 is the yaw rate from the yaw rate sensor and YawRate_2 is the yaw rate derived from the wheel sensors (such as anti-lock braking system (ABS) wheel sensors) and YawRate_3 is the yaw rate derived from the lateral acceleration of the vehicle and YawRate_4 is derived from the steering wheel angle, wheel angle and the rate of change of steering wheel angle.






YawRate





2


:




y

r





2


=

Vx
R








YawRate





3


:




y

r





3


=


Vx
2

R






Computation of radius of curvature R:














1
R

=


2
L



(




V
rl


V
rr


-
1




V
rl


V
rr


+
1


)



,












V
x

=




ω
rl

+

ω
rr


2


r






where






V
fl


,

V
fr

,





,


V
rr






wheel





velocity












m
/
s















for





four





wheels

,
and
,





w
fl

,

w
fr

,





,

w
rr

















wheel






rotation
.


















V
x

=

longitudinal





velocity


,





r
=

radius





nominal





rear





wheel








rear





wheel













The yaw rate data analysis provides a “vehicle state” that is a function of the yaw rate, the SWA, SWA_Rate, the lateral acceleration and wheel velocity.


The system uses signal conditioning, with a sampling frequency of about 100 Hz and a desired cut off frequency of about 0.5 Hz to about 2 Hz or thereabouts. The system uses two filters:


The Long Time Period Filter (60-180) sec.=[0.0167−0.005] Hz

    • i) Compute Offset At Standstill (Velocity=0);
    • ii) Compute Offset when driving straight
      • (Steering Angle˜=0) (Steering Rate of Change˜=0);
    • iii) Compute Variance of noise;
    • iv) Estimate the offset using a PID controller; and
    • v) Define weights on the estimate from (i) and (ii).


The Short Time IIR filter is around 2.0 Hz.


The system calculates offset estimates using weights and statistics.


As shown in FIG. 2, the system processes the four yaw rates via statistical estimation and analysis to determine the estimated yaw rate. The system may use adaptive offset estimation using Recursive Least Squares (RLS), confidence weighted average combined with Recursive Least Squares. FIGS. 3-5 show the yaw rate estimation process, the yaw rate offset estimation process and the estimation block in accordance with the present invention. FIGS. 6-8 are graphs showing the variance of the yaw rate signals (FIG. 6), the offset correction (FIG. 7) and the yaw rate estimation output (FIG. 8).


The system may provide additional outputs, such as, for example, a driving state: stable flag or output, a vehicle stationary engine running output, a vehicle driving straight and level output, a detection of sensor faults, such as a residual error (MSE) based confidence measure.


The system of the present invention may utilize aspects of the systems described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,694,224 and/or U.S. Publication Nos. US-2015-0291215 and/or US-2014-0350834, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.


Changes and modifications in the specifically described embodiments can be carried out without departing from the principles of the invention, which is intended to be limited only by the scope of the appended claims, as interpreted according to the principles of patent law including the doctrine of equivalents.

Claims
  • 1. A vehicular control system, said vehicular control system comprising: a camera disposed at a vehicle equipped with said vehicular control system, wherein said camera is disposed at a windshield of the equipped vehicle and views through the windshield and forward of the equipped vehicle;wherein said vehicular control system of the equipped vehicle comprises one selected from the group consisting of (i) a collision avoidance system, (ii) a collision mitigation system and (iii) a lane keeping system;wherein said vehicular control system is responsive at least in part to a yaw rate estimation system of the equipped vehicle;wherein said yaw rate estimation system comprises a yaw rate sensor disposed at the equipped vehicle;wherein said yaw rate estimation system comprises wheel sensors disposed at wheels of the equipped vehicle;wherein said yaw rate estimation system comprises an accelerometer disposed at the equipped vehicle and operable to determine acceleration of the equipped vehicle;wherein said yaw rate estimation system comprises a steering sensor disposed at the equipped vehicle and operable to determine steering of the equipped vehicle;wherein said yaw rate estimation system comprises a control disposed at the equipped vehicle, said control comprising a processor that estimates the actual yaw rate of the equipped vehicle by processing (i) a first yaw rate derived from yaw rate data provided to said control by said yaw rate sensor of the equipped vehicle, (ii) a second yaw rate derived from wheel sensor data provided to said control by said wheel sensors of the equipped vehicle, (iii) a third yaw rate derived from acceleration data provided to said control by said accelerometer, and (iv) a fourth yaw rate derived from steering data provided to said control by said steering sensor; andwherein said vehicular control system utilizes (i) image data captured by said camera as the equipped vehicle is being driven along a road and (ii) the estimated actual yaw rate of the equipped vehicle as the equipped vehicle is being driven along the road.
  • 2. The vehicular control system of claim 1, wherein said accelerometer is operable to determine longitudinal acceleration of the equipped vehicle.
  • 3. The vehicular control system of claim 1, wherein said accelerometer is operable to determine lateral acceleration of the equipped vehicle.
  • 4. The vehicular control system of claim 1, wherein said control is operable to estimate the actual yaw rate of the equipped vehicle using statistical analysis of said first, second, third and fourth yaw rates.
  • 5. The vehicular control system of claim 4, wherein the statistical analysis uses Recursive Least Squares.
  • 6. The vehicular control system of claim 5, wherein the statistical analysis uses Confidence Weighted Average combined with Recursive Least Squares.
  • 7. The vehicular control system of claim 1, wherein said wheel sensors comprise wheel sensors of an anti-lock brake system of the equipped vehicle, and wherein said second yaw rate is derived from said anti-lock brake system wheel sensors of the equipped vehicle.
  • 8. The vehicular control system of claim 1, wherein said yaw rate sensor is operable to sense a left yaw rate of the equipped vehicle and a right yaw rate of the equipped vehicle.
  • 9. The vehicular control system of claim 1, wherein said yaw rate sensor is operable to sense positive and negative angular rotational velocity of the equipped vehicle about a local vertical axis of the equipped vehicle.
  • 10. The vehicular control system of claim 1, wherein output of said yaw rate sensor is communicated to said control via a communication bus of the equipped vehicle.
  • 11. The vehicular control system of claim 1, wherein said control, responsive to estimation of the actual yaw rate, provides yaw rate offset correction to correct said first yaw rate.
  • 12. The vehicular control system of claim 1, wherein said control, responsive to estimation of the actual yaw rate, provides noise filtering for the data received from said yaw rate sensor.
  • 13. The vehicular control system of claim 1, wherein said yaw rate sensor comprises one of (i) a piezoelectric device, (ii) a micromechanical device, and (iii) a microelectromechanical device.
  • 14. A vehicular control system, said vehicular control system comprising: a camera disposed at a vehicle equipped with said vehicular control system, wherein said camera is disposed at a windshield of the equipped vehicle and views through the windshield and forward of the equipped vehicle;wherein said vehicular control system of the equipped vehicle comprises a collision avoidance system;wherein said vehicular control system is responsive at least in part to a yaw rate estimation system of the equipped vehicle;wherein said yaw rate estimation system comprises a yaw rate sensor disposed at the equipped vehicle;wherein said yaw rate estimation system comprises wheel sensors disposed at wheels of the equipped vehicle;wherein said yaw rate estimation system comprises an accelerometer disposed at the equipped vehicle and operable to determine acceleration of the equipped vehicle;wherein said yaw rate estimation system comprises a steering sensor disposed at the equipped vehicle and operable to determine steering of the equipped vehicle;wherein said yaw rate estimation system comprises a control disposed at the equipped vehicle, said control comprising a processor that estimates the actual yaw rate of the equipped vehicle by processing (i) a first yaw rate derived from yaw rate data provided to said control by said yaw rate sensor of the equipped vehicle, (ii) a second yaw rate derived from wheel sensor data provided to said control by said wheel sensors of the equipped vehicle, (iii) a third yaw rate derived from acceleration data provided to said control by said accelerometer, and (iv) a fourth yaw rate derived from steering data provided to said control by said steering sensor;wherein output of said yaw rate sensor is communicated to said control via a communication bus of the equipped vehicle;wherein said control is operable to estimate the actual yaw rate of the equipped vehicle using statistical analysis of said first, second, third and fourth yaw rates; andwherein said vehicular control system utilizes (i) image data captured by said camera as the equipped vehicle is being driven along a road and (ii) the estimated actual yaw rate of the equipped vehicle as the equipped vehicle is being driven along the road.
  • 15. The vehicular control system of claim 14, wherein the statistical analysis uses Recursive Least Squares.
  • 16. The vehicular control system of claim 15, wherein the statistical analysis uses Confidence Weighted Average combined with Recursive Least Squares.
  • 17. The vehicular control system of claim 15, wherein said yaw rate sensor is operable to sense positive and negative angular rotational velocity of the equipped vehicle about a local vertical axis of the equipped vehicle.
  • 18. A vehicular control system, said vehicular control system comprising: a camera disposed at a vehicle equipped with said vehicular control system, wherein said camera is disposed at a windshield of the equipped vehicle and views through the windshield and forward of the equipped vehicle;wherein said vehicular control system of the equipped vehicle comprises a lane keeping system;wherein said vehicular control system is responsive at least in part to a yaw rate estimation system of the equipped vehicle;wherein said yaw rate estimation system comprises a yaw rate sensor disposed at the equipped vehicle and operable to sense a left yaw rate of the equipped vehicle and a right yaw rate of the equipped vehicle;wherein said yaw rate estimation system comprises wheel sensors disposed at wheels of the equipped vehicle;wherein said yaw rate estimation system comprises an accelerometer disposed at the equipped vehicle and operable to determine one of (i) lateral acceleration of the equipped vehicle and (ii) longitudinal acceleration of the equipped vehicle;wherein said yaw rate estimation system comprises a steering sensor disposed at the equipped vehicle and operable to determine steering of the equipped vehicle;wherein said yaw rate estimation system comprises a control disposed at the equipped vehicle, said control comprising a processor that estimates the actual yaw rate of the equipped vehicle by processing (i) a first yaw rate derived from yaw rate data provided to said control by said yaw rate sensor of the equipped vehicle, (ii) a second yaw rate derived from wheel sensor data provided to said control by said wheel sensors of the equipped vehicle, (iii) a third yaw rate derived from acceleration data provided to said control by said accelerometer, and (iv) a fourth yaw rate derived from steering data provided to said control by said steering sensor;wherein said wheel sensors comprise wheel sensors of an anti-lock brake system of the equipped vehicle, and wherein said second yaw rate is derived from said anti-lock brake system wheel sensors of the equipped vehicle; andwherein said vehicular control system of the equipped vehicle utilizes (i) image data captured by said camera as the equipped vehicle is being driven along a road and (ii) the estimated actual yaw rate of the equipped vehicle as the equipped vehicle is being driven along the road.
  • 19. The vehicular control system of claim 18, wherein said yaw rate sensor is operable to sense positive and negative angular rotational velocity of the equipped vehicle about a local vertical axis of the equipped vehicle.
  • 20. The vehicular control system of claim 18, wherein said control, responsive to estimation of the actual yaw rate, provides yaw rate offset correction to correct said first yaw rate.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/051,825, filed Feb. 24, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,764,744, which claims the filing benefits of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 62/120,574, filed Feb. 25, 2015, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (126)
Number Name Date Kind
5550677 Schofield et al. Aug 1996 A
5670935 Schofield et al. Sep 1997 A
5677851 Kingdon et al. Oct 1997 A
5699044 Van Lente et al. Dec 1997 A
5724316 Brunts Mar 1998 A
5732379 Eckert et al. Mar 1998 A
5737226 Olson et al. Apr 1998 A
5760828 Cortes Jun 1998 A
5760931 Saburi et al. Jun 1998 A
5760962 Schofield et al. Jun 1998 A
5761094 Olson et al. Jun 1998 A
5765116 Wilson-Jones et al. Jun 1998 A
5765118 Fukatani Jun 1998 A
5781437 Wiemer et al. Jul 1998 A
5796094 Schofield et al. Aug 1998 A
5877897 Schofield et al. Mar 1999 A
5878357 Sivashankar et al. Mar 1999 A
5878370 Olson Mar 1999 A
5883739 Ashihara et al. Mar 1999 A
5884212 Lion Mar 1999 A
5890021 Onoda Mar 1999 A
5896085 Mori et al. Apr 1999 A
5899956 Chan May 1999 A
5915800 Hiwatashi et al. Jun 1999 A
5923027 Stam et al. Jul 1999 A
5924212 Domanski Jul 1999 A
6097024 Stam et al. Aug 2000 A
6144022 Tenenbaum et al. Nov 2000 A
6175300 Kendrick Jan 2001 B1
6178034 Allemand et al. Jan 2001 B1
6198409 Schofield et al. Mar 2001 B1
6223114 Boros et al. Apr 2001 B1
6266082 Yonezawa et al. Jul 2001 B1
6266442 Laumeyer et al. Jul 2001 B1
6285393 Shimoura et al. Sep 2001 B1
6310611 Caldwell Oct 2001 B1
6317057 Lee Nov 2001 B1
6320282 Caldwell Nov 2001 B1
6333759 Mazzilli Dec 2001 B1
6370329 Teuchert Apr 2002 B1
6392315 Jones et al. May 2002 B1
6424273 Gutta et al. Jul 2002 B1
6430303 Naoi et al. Aug 2002 B1
6442465 Breed et al. Aug 2002 B2
6477464 McCarthy et al. Nov 2002 B2
6497503 Dassanayake et al. Dec 2002 B1
6553130 Lemelson et al. Apr 2003 B1
6574033 Chui et al. Jun 2003 B1
6589625 Kothari et al. Jul 2003 B1
6594583 Ogura et al. Jul 2003 B2
6611610 Stam et al. Aug 2003 B1
6636258 Strumolo Oct 2003 B2
6672731 Schnell et al. Jan 2004 B2
6678614 McCarthy et al. Jan 2004 B2
6690268 Schofield et al. Feb 2004 B2
6700605 Toyoda et al. Mar 2004 B1
6704621 Stein et al. Mar 2004 B1
6711474 Treyz et al. Mar 2004 B1
6714331 Lewis et al. Mar 2004 B2
6735506 Breed et al. May 2004 B2
6744353 Sjönell Jun 2004 B2
6762867 Lippert et al. Jul 2004 B2
6795221 Urey Sep 2004 B1
6806452 Bos et al. Oct 2004 B2
6819231 Berberich et al. Nov 2004 B2
6823241 Shirato et al. Nov 2004 B2
6824281 Schofield et al. Nov 2004 B2
6889161 Winner et al. May 2005 B2
6909753 Meehan et al. Jun 2005 B2
6975775 Rykowski et al. Dec 2005 B2
6989736 Berberich et al. Jan 2006 B2
7005974 McMahon et al. Feb 2006 B2
7038577 Pawlicki et al. May 2006 B2
7062300 Kim Jun 2006 B1
7065432 Moisel et al. Jun 2006 B2
7079017 Lang et al. Jul 2006 B2
7085637 Breed et al. Aug 2006 B2
7092548 Laumeyer et al. Aug 2006 B2
7111968 Bauer et al. Sep 2006 B2
7116246 Winter et al. Oct 2006 B2
7145519 Takahashi et al. Dec 2006 B2
7149613 Stam et al. Dec 2006 B2
7161616 Okamoto et al. Jan 2007 B1
7167796 Taylor et al. Jan 2007 B2
7195381 Lynam et al. Mar 2007 B2
7202776 Breed Apr 2007 B2
7227611 Hull et al. Jun 2007 B2
7460951 Altan Dec 2008 B2
7480149 DeWard et al. Jan 2009 B2
7490007 Taylor et al. Feb 2009 B2
7581859 Lynam Sep 2009 B2
7592928 Chinomi et al. Sep 2009 B2
7616781 Schofield et al. Nov 2009 B2
7619508 Lynam et al. Nov 2009 B2
7639149 Katoh Dec 2009 B2
7681960 Wanke et al. Mar 2010 B2
7720580 Higgins-Luthman May 2010 B2
7881496 Camilleri et al. Feb 2011 B2
8027029 Lu et al. Sep 2011 B2
8058977 Lynam Nov 2011 B2
8340866 Hanzawa et al. Dec 2012 B2
8694224 Chundrlik, Jr. et al. Apr 2014 B2
9764744 Bajpai Sep 2017 B2
20020015153 Downs Feb 2002 A1
20020113873 Williams Aug 2002 A1
20030137586 Lewellen Jul 2003 A1
20030156015 Winner Aug 2003 A1
20030222982 Hamdan et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040114381 Salmeen et al. Jun 2004 A1
20060018511 Stam et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060018512 Stam et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060091813 Stam et al. May 2006 A1
20060103727 Tseng May 2006 A1
20060250501 Wildmann et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060290479 Akatsuka et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070104476 Yasutomi et al. May 2007 A1
20080189013 Iwazaki Aug 2008 A1
20090113509 Tseng et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090177347 Breuer et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090244361 Gebauer et al. Oct 2009 A1
20100228437 Hanzawa et al. Sep 2010 A1
20120245817 Cooprider et al. Sep 2012 A1
20130124052 Hahne May 2013 A1
20130231825 Chundrlik, Jr. Sep 2013 A1
20140350834 Turk Nov 2014 A1
20150291215 Bajpai et al. Oct 2015 A1
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180001900 A1 Jan 2018 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62120574 Feb 2015 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 15051825 Feb 2016 US
Child 15707026 US