The present invention relates generally to the fields of electronics, traffic engineering and public safety and more particularly to devices and methods useable for delineating bounds or path(s) of travel, channelizing vehicular traffic and enhancing safety in highway work zones.
Pursuant to 37 CFR 1.71(e), this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection and the owner of this patent document reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
It is common for personnel, such as law enforcement, first responders, departments of transportation maintenance and construction workers, trucking and utility personnel, etc., to work in areas on or near roadways. Personnel working on roadways are subject to injury or death as a result of vehicles entering their workspace. Thus, there exists a need for a system that alerts personnel on the roadway when an approaching vehicle is on a trajectory that may lead to intrusion of their work area.
In some situations, it is possible to place temporary protective barriers, such as concrete or steel barriers, around a work zone or other protected area. However, placing such barriers is cumbersome and expensive and such barriers are not appropriate for short-term deployment. Intrusion alarms have come to market but can be expensive, challenging to deploy, subject to false triggering and, in some cases, difficult for workers to hear, see or feel in noisy or chaotic work zones, heavy construction sites, major accident scenes, etc.
Prior intrusion alarms have used radar or Lidar to scan a path ahead of the work zone and to detect vehicular incursions into the work zone. These technologies can be expensive and may consume considerable power thereby requiring that they be mounted on a trailer or other large, stationary object. If the work zone moves, it is typically necessary to move and/or re-aim the radar or Lidar system. The warning modality is typically a horn or vibration device worn by the worker. A vibration device worn outside clothing, especially in a colder climate, may be dampened and may not be felt. If the worker is using a power tool, the vibration device may become even less effective, as will sound alarms when ear protection is being worn.
Disclosed are systems for alerting personnel of a vehicular incursion (e.g., entry or intrusion into) into a protected area, wherein the system comprises: at least one incursion sensing device positionable at a location on or near a protected area, said at least one incursion sensing device comprising a sensor configured to sense a vehicular incursion into the protected area; and a transmitter which transmits an incursion signal when the sensor senses an event indicative of a vehicle entering the protected area. A vehicle receiver/interface device is located in or connectable to a vehicle that is equipped with at least one alarm device (e.g., horn, siren, light , PA system), said vehicle receiver/interface device comprising; a receiver which receives the incursion signal from said at least one incursion sensing device; and circuitry connected to one or more components of the vehicle and configured to cause the audible or visual alarm(s) of the vehicle to emit an incursion alarm in response to receipt by the receiver of incursion signal.
In some embodiments the incursion sensing device is configured to sense a vehicular incursion into the protected area by sensing at least one incursion event selected from: a vehicle impacting the incursion sensing device; a vehicle overturning the incursion sensing device; a vehicle running over, crushing or compressing the incursion sensing device; a vehicle hitting the incursion sensing device; a vehicle causing movement of the incursion sensing device; a vehicle passing over the incursion sensing device; and/or a vehicle passing by the incursion sensing device.
In some embodiments, said at least one incursion sensing device may be included in (e.g., combined with or integrated in) an electronic flare that is positionable on or near a boundary of the protected area.
In some embodiments, the incursion sensing device(s) may comprise(s) a gyroscopic sensor, impact sensor, compression sensor, light detector, metal detector, pressure sensor or movement sensor positioned on or in the incursion sensing device(s).
In some embodiments, the incursion sensing device(s) comprise emitters(s) and sensor(s) may operate to emit and receive beam(s) or flow(s) of energy or tether(s), wherein interruption, blocking or disrupting of said beam(s), flow(s) of energy or tether(s) causes sensor(s) to detect a possible vehicle incursion and cause the transmitter to transmit the incursion signal to the vehicle receiver/interface device in response to the interruption or blocking of said beam(s) or flow(s) of energy. Such beam(s), flow(s) of energy or tether(s) may, for example, comprise one or more of: light, laser light, infrared light; ultrasound, mechanical tether.
In some embodiments, the incursion signal receiving/processing device may be configured for connection to a Controller Area Network (CAN) and/or Local Interconnect Network (LIN) of a vehicle, such as a service vehicle (e.g., emergency services vehicle, highway maintenance vehicle, etc.). A vehicle receiver/interface device may be connected to a CAN or LIN bus of the vehicle in a manner that will cause said incursion alarm to be emitted by said at least one alarm device (e.g., horn, siren, light, public address (PA) system, etc.) of the vehicle. In some such embodiments, the system may further comprise one or more remote alarm device(s), which may be located apart from the service vehicle, such remote alarm device(s) being operative to issue an additional incursion alert(s) which may be perceptible by person(s) within the protected area or other personnel. Also, the vehicle receiver/interface device may further comprise a transmitter which transmits a wireless alarm signal to one or more remote alerting device(s) to cause said one or more remote alarm device(s) to issue said additional incursion alert(s). In some embodiments, said one or more remote alarm device(s) may be mounted on or integrated into an article of clothing, device or piece of equipment; for example, a remote alarm device may comprise an LED light incorporated into or attached to a personal protective equipment such as eye protectors or headgear (e.g., a workers hard hat) wearable by personnel in the protected area.
In some embodiments, an incursion sensing device useable for sensing incursion of a vehicle into a protected area comprises: a housing, platform or body positionable on or near a boundary of a protected area; at least one sensing apparatus configured to sense at least one incursion event selected from: a vehicle impacting the incursion sensing device; a vehicle overturning the incursion sensing device; a vehicle running over, crushing or compressing the incursion sensing device; a vehicle hitting the incursion sensing device; a vehicle causing movement of the incursion sensing device; a vehicle passing over the incursion sensing device; and/or a vehicle passing by the incursion sensing device; and a transmitter in communication with said at least one sensing apparatus, said transmitter being configured to transmit a wireless incursion signal when said at least one sensing apparatus senses said at least one incursion event. In some embodiments, such said at least one sensing apparatus may comprise one or more of: gyroscopic sensor, impact sensor, compression sensor, light detector, metal detector, pressure sensor or movement sensor.
In some embodiments, an incursion sensing system comprises: at least a first incursion sensing device and a second incursion sensing device, wherein: the first incursion sensing device comprises at least an emitter which emits a beam, flow of energy or tether; and the second incursion device comprises a) at least one sensor which receives the beam, flow of energy or tether from the first incursion sensing device, b) a transmitter, and c) circuitry configured to cause the transmitter to transmit a wireless incursion signal when the sensor senses that the beam, flow of energy or tether has been interrupted, blocked or disrupted in a manner indicative of a possible vehicular incursion.
In some embodiments, a vehicle receiver/interface device is connected, or connectable to a vehicle that is equipped with at least one alarm device (e.g., horn, siren, light, PA system), said vehicle receiver/interface device comprising; a receiver configured to receive an incursion signal; and circuitry configured to cause the audible or visual alarm(s) of a vehicle to emit an incursion alarm in response to receipt by the receiver of an incursion signal.
In some embodiments, such vehicle receiver/interface device may be configured for connection to a CAN or LIN bus of a vehicle.
In some embodiments, a remote alarm or personal warning device comprises: an alarm mounted on or integrated into an article of clothing, a tool, a power tool, an article of personal safety or protective equipment or a piece of equipment useable for performing a task; a receiver configured to receive a wireless alarm triggering signal; and circuitry which causes activation of the alarm when the receiver receives an alarm triggering signal.
In some embodiments, a system comprises: at least one incursion sensing device or incursion sensing system in combination with a vehicle receiver/interface device and a personal warning or remote alarm device, wherein: the vehicle receiver/interface device is configured to receive an incursion signal from said at least one incursion sensing device or said incursion sensing system; and the personal warning or remote alarm device is configured to receive an alarm triggering signal from the vehicle receiver/interface device.
In some embodiments, a method for alerting personnel of a vehicular incursion into a protected area comprises the steps of: deploying an incursion sensing system of a type summarized above and operating said system to alert personnel of a vehicular incursion into a protected area.
Still further aspects and details of the present disclosure may be understood from, but shall not be limited by, the accompanying figures and the detailed description below.
The accompanying
The following description describes certain aspects of the present disclosure and, where relevant, refers to the non-limiting examples shown in the accompanying drawings.
As may be appreciated from the showing of
The vehicle receiver/interface device 14 is connected to or located in a vehicle V, such as a service vehicle, police vehicle, fire apparatus, etc., located in or near the protected area PA. The vehicle V is equipped with at least one audible or visual alarm device (e.g., a horn, light(s), siren, public address system, etc.). The vehicle receiver/interface device 14 is configured to receive the incursion signal 18 from the incursion sensing device(s) 12 and, in response thereto, to cause the vehicle's audible or visual alarm(s) to emit an audible or visual alarm indicating that a vehicular incursion has been detected.
In systems 10 which also include optional remote alarm device(s) 16, the incursion signal receiving/processing device 14 may additionally be equipped and configured to transmit a wireless (e.g., radio frequency) activation signal 20 to the optional remote alarm device(s) 16. Receipt of such activation signal 20 by the remote alarm device(s) 16 will cause the remote alarm device(s) 16 to issue additional incursion alarms signal(s) (e.g., visual, auditory and/or tactile signals) to further warn person(s) within the protected area PA of a sensed vehicular incursion. In this manner incursion alert signals may be emitted from both a service vehicle V positioned in or near the protected area PA and from one or more optional remote alarm device(s) 16 positioned on or near personnel who are working within the protected area. In addition, the interface/receiver device may include a cellular modem to provide alert and data communication to a Cloud server via cellular connectivity. Such cellular connectivity provides a conduit to deliver alert information to law enforcement, transportation departments, and to Cloud servers that provide mapping information for autonomous vehicles and traffic management systems operated by state and local governments.
Although the example of
Incursion Sensing Device(s)
The incursion sensing device(s) 12 may comprise sensors or detectors of any type operable to sense or detect when a vehicle has transitioned into a protected area PA. In some embodiments, the incursion sensing device(s) may comprise impact sensors, compression sensors, accelerometers, light detectors, magnetic or metal detectors, sound detectors, air pressure sensors, infrared heat sensors, radar or ultrasound proximity detectors, devices that emit and receive beams or flows of energy (e.g., infrared or laser light), or other devices operative to sense when impacted, overturned, run over or passed by a vehicle entering a protected area. In some embodiments, in addition to sensing when a vehicular incursion has occurred, the incursion sensing device(s) 12 may also perform a marking function by emitting light or other signals to illuminate or mark the boundary of the protected area PA.
For example,
In some embodiments, the incursion sensing device 12 or 12a may be equipped with multiple LEDs or a photodetector for detecting changes in ambient light as a vehicle passes over the device 12a even if the vehicle does not actually impact or move the device 12a. LEDs, when reversed biased, can be used as photodetectors, thereby allowing use of a flare designed for light emission to perform as a light detector. Using Hall Effect electronic components or other ferrite metal detectors would also allow for sensing of a vehicle trajectory that brings it close to the sensor and therefore presenting danger to the worker. Similarly, changes in air pressure, or vibratory motion of the sensor created by a pressure wave produced by the vehicle could be sensed by a pressure sensor or by the accelerometer.
In addition, or as an alternative to sensing when a vehicle has impacted, moved or passed directly over an incursion sensing device 12, some embodiments of incursion sensing devices 12 may emit and detect beam(s) or flow(s) of energy (e.g., light, laser light, infrared light, ultrasound, etc.) or tether(s) (e.g., mechanical members, wires, strings, etc.) which, when interrupted, blocked or disrupted by a vehicle incursion, will cause the incursion sensing device 12 to transmit an incursion signal 18.
Radar, LIDAR, Microwave: An alternative embodiment would use visual technology to detect and track a vehicle on a path that might imperil workers on the roadway. A video camera or LIDAR would identify the vehicle and with adequate processing power could resolve that a vehicle is approaching with minimal latency. Radar or microwave detection would provide significant range extension such that the operator need not place the sensors many hundreds of meters in the direction of oncoming traffic.
In some embodiments, incursion sensing devices 12 may be mounted on or integrated as part of other traffic channelizing or marking devices, such as traffic cones, tubular delineators, barrels, fences, rails, etc.
In some embodiments, where feasible, components or attributes of one of the above-described incursion sensing devices 12a, 12b may be combined in a single device. For example, a single incursion device 12 may have both an impact or motion sensor (e.g., an accelerometer, motion detector, MEMS, etc.) and emitters/sensors for emitting and receiving a beam, flow of energy or tether. Such incursion sensing devices 12 equipped with both impact/motion sensors and beam/flow of energy/tether emitters/sensors would detect vehicular incursions irrespective of whether the vehicle actually hits, impacts, runs over top of, or passes between, the incursion sensing device(s) 12.
Vehicle Receiver/Interface Device
In the example of
When the vehicle receiver/interface device 14a receives an incursion signal 18 from an incursion sensing device 12, it in turn sends signal(s) via the vehicle's circuitry to activate one or more vehicle alarm(s) (e.g., light(s), horn, siren, public address (PA) speakers system, etc.) in a manner intended to alert personnel located within the protected area PA. In some embodiments, the vehicle alarm(s) may be caused to issue a unique incursion alarm signal (e.g., a specific pattern of sounds, light flashes, etc.) that will be understood by personnel to indicate a detected vehicular incursion into the protected area PA.
The MCU radiofrequency receiver (or transceiver) 40 may be set to listen (constantly or very frequently) for any incursion signal 18 from an incursion sensing device 12 or 12a on a desired frequency (e.g., 2.4 GHz, 900 MHz band or 1 GHz band).
When the MCU radiofrequency receiver (or transceiver) 40 receives an incursion signal 18 from an incursion sensing device 12 , 12a, the CAN/LIN bus transceiver 42 promptly sends a signal to the vehicle's CAN/LIN bus 44 which causes an incursion alarm to be emitted from one or more of the vehicle's apparatus (e.g., horn, lights, siren, PA system, etc.) The CAN/LIN transceiver 42 may be connected to the vehicle's CAN/LIN bus 44 by any suitable means such as, for example via standard protocols such as UART, USB, SPI I-squared-C, or direct input-output. The vehicle receiver/interface device 14a may be powered by any suitable means such as, for example, by a combination of the 12-, 24-, or 48-volt vehicle power bus, or via a DC to AC inverter, and an internal battery backup to prevent malfunction should the vehicle power supply be disrupted. One example of such a situation may be, if the vehicle receiver/interface device 14a is plugged into a vehicle's power receptacle (e.g., cigarette lighter) and vibration or inadvertent movement causes such connection to be disrupted, the internal battery (if present) would assure continuous operation.
As an alternative to a CAN/LIN bus connection as shown in
In systems that include one or more optional remote alarm device(s) 16, the MCU radiofrequency receiver or transceiver 40 of the vehicle receiver/interface device 14a will comprise a transceiver (or will include a separate transmitter) which promptly transmits the alarm signal 20 to the optional remote alarm device(s) 16 causing them to also emit warning alarms. In this embodiment the device 14a need not be connected to the vehicle or to the vehicles electrical system, and the CAN/LIN component 42 is not required. Radio receiver 40 of device 14a will then perform as another node in the mesh network of sensors 12 and relay warning signals sent to it by sensors 12 to the remote warning device 16.
Remote Alarm/Personal Warning Devices
In embodiments of the system 10 that include one or more remote alarm device(s) 16, such remote alarm device(s) 16 may be located near or actually on persons who are working within the protected area PA. Thus, in some instances remote alarm device(s) 16 may be positioned on posts, walls, pieces of equipment, tools or articles of clothing on or near the personnel. One example, is a headgear-mounted remote alarm 16a as shown in
As shown in
Further Information/Additional Components/Alternatives
In some embodiments of the system 10, the incursion sensing device(s) 12, 12a, 12b may also function as sequential light emitting electronic flares. Such sequential flares typically undergo flare-to-flare radiofrequency communication to maintain their desired flashing sequence or pattern, the radiofrequency MCU transceivers may be in a quiescent low-power mode for much (e.g., 99%) of the time and become activated to receive incoming signals from other flares only at certain times. This enables the flares to conserve power while operating in the intended manner. In contrast, it is important for the present system to promptly receive and act upon any incursion signal 18 emitted from even a single incursion sensing device 12, 12a, 12b. Thus, in embodiments where a number for the incursion sensing devices 12, 12a, 12b are functioning as nodes of a mesh network, it may be desirable or necessary for an incursion signal 28 initiated from one of the incursion sensing devices 12, 12a, 12b to be passed along or transmitted to/from other incursion sensing device(S) 12, 12a, 12b before reaching the MCU radiofrequency receiver (or transceiver) 40 of this vehicle receiver/interface device 14, 14a. Thus, in at least some such embodiments, it will be important for all of the incursion sensing device(s) 12, 12a, 12b to remain in active receive mode and able to receive/retransmit an incursion signal 18 with minimal latency or delay. Thus, when operating as part of the present system 10, existing electronic flares of the type described above may be set or reprogrammed to remain active continuously or nearly continuously. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the system may utilize both mesh and non-meshed radio architecture. Mesh architecture allows is for low-power radio use because in mesh architecture the radio does not have to be powered on all of the time. Rather, the mesh system is configured to determine when to transmit and when to listen to minimize power consumption while not broadcasting concurrently with one another (e.g., “stepping on” each other's transmission). In some embodiments of the herein-disclosed incursion sensing device(s) 12, 12a, 12b, the speed of notification may be critical, so all of the radios of the incursion sensing devices 12, 12a, 12b may utilize non-mesh architecture and may be required to be listening all of the time. In a non-meshed radio architecture, all of the nodes (e.g., the sensing devices 12, 12a, 12b) that encompass the network will be in receive mode (listening). One or more of those sensors that are impacted, or experience a change in ambient light, or magnetic field, or sound or pressure change, as a result of a passing vehicle violating the boundary of a work zone or area where personnel are working, may be out of range of the warning siren, flashing light, headgear radio receiver, etc. The warning signal transmitted will, however, be received by another, closer, node or nodes. Each node that receives the alert signal will relay the alert to other nodes by transmitting, then listening, to determine whether other nodes are transmitting. If a transmission is received, each node will wait a pre-programmed time delay and then send the alert again. In this way, an uncorrupted signal will propagate to the helmet receivers, vehicle receiver, siren, or other emitters, to alert personnel. The consequence of using such non-mesh architecture is that battery power consumption may be greater. However, in applications where the system is used for limited or relatively short periods of time, recharging and redeployment of the system or replacement of batteries may be feasible to maintain adequate power. Hence, the added energy burden (e.g., more frequent recharging or replacement of batteries) of a non-meshed network may, in some applications, be an acceptable requirement given the benefits of a) a less complicated radio system and b) faster propagation of the warning signal to the personnel at risk.
As explained above, some electronic sequential flares useable as part of this system 10 may require periodic battery replacement or recharging (e.g., every 18 hours in some cases). However, many of the intended uses for this system 10 are at emergency/accident scenes or roadway worksites, which may typically remain in operation for limited periods of time, such as ten hours or less.
Also, in some embodiments or applications, it may not be feasible for the receiver/interface device 14 to be connected to a vehicle V. Therefore, in some embodiments, rather than interacting with a vehicle V, the receiver/interface device 14 may be placed on a stand, post, wall or other object located in or near the protected area PA and connected directly to an alarm device such as a horn, light siren etc.
In some embodiments, the system 10 may also be equipped to provide upstream mapping and/or location information to oncoming vehicles (including manually driver and/or autonomous vehicles) or other remote locations using, cellular, fiber optic, hard-wired, internet and/or Cloud services, or through direct infrastructure-to-vehicle communication. Such services include examples such as Waze and Google Maps, Here Technologies, or Haas Alert. The location of the multiple elements (nodes, flares, lamps, geo-tags) of the intrusion alarm, location enabled with GNSS (GPS) can be delivered by Cloud connectivity to onboard mapping systems in production automobiles that will both display the position and nature of the approaching incident or work zone and be analyzed and incorporated into onboard and cloud computers to guide autonomous vehicles and human drivers. These data, including location, temperature, vibration, impact, vehicle count, speed of vehicle, presence of a queue of vehicles, can provide ground truth information for departments of transportation, the autonomous vehicle and Cloud servers that support them, and for mapping services. In addition, indication of a vehicular incursion into a work area could be forwarded, once received by the Cloud server, to law enforcement or medical personnel. Law enforcement, often positioned near the work zone or road incident, could then be notified quickly enough that the offending driver could be located or apprehended. The transportation department upon notification might alert drivers via fixed and mobile message boards that an incident has occurred ahead of their position.
Although the invention has been described hereabove with reference to certain examples or embodiments of the invention, various additions, deletions, alterations and modifications may be made to those described examples and embodiments without departing from the intended spirit and scope of the invention. For example, any elements, steps, members, components, compositions, reactants, parts or portions of one embodiment or example may be incorporated into or used with another embodiment or example, unless otherwise specified or unless doing so would render that embodiment or example unsuitable for its intended use. Also, where the steps of a method or process have been described or listed in a particular order, the order of such steps may be changed unless otherwise specified or unless doing so would render the method or process unsuitable for its intended purpose. Additionally, the elements, steps, members, components, compositions, reactants, parts or portions of any claim or example described herein may optionally exist or be utilized with elimination of, or in the absence or substantial absence of, any one or more of the specified elements, steps, members, components, compositions, reactants, parts or portions, unless otherwise noted. All reasonable additions, deletions, modifications and alterations are to be considered equivalents of the described examples and embodiments and are to be included within the scope of the following claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 63/294,608 entitled Vehicular Incursion Alert Systems and Methods filed Dec. 29, 2021, the entire disclosure of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3500378 | Pickering et al. | Mar 1970 | A |
3787867 | Dodge et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3846672 | Doughty | Nov 1974 | A |
4132983 | Shapiro | Jan 1979 | A |
4249159 | Stasko | Feb 1981 | A |
4345305 | Kolm et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4827245 | Lipman | May 1989 | A |
4841278 | Tezuka et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
5294924 | Dydzyk | Mar 1994 | A |
5345232 | Robertson | Sep 1994 | A |
5428546 | Shah et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5438495 | Ahlen et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5551370 | Hwang | Sep 1996 | A |
5673039 | Pietzsch et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5754124 | Daggett et al. | May 1998 | A |
6299379 | Lewis | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6332077 | Wu et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6486797 | Laidman | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6549121 | Povey et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6614358 | Hutchison et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
D498164 | Delich | Nov 2004 | S |
6929378 | Wang | Aug 2005 | B2 |
D510289 | Dueker et al. | Oct 2005 | S |
6963275 | Smalls | Nov 2005 | B2 |
D515957 | Dueker et al. | Feb 2006 | S |
D515958 | Dueker et al. | Feb 2006 | S |
7088222 | Dueker et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7106179 | Dueker et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7182479 | Flood et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7230546 | Nelson et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7277809 | DeWitt, Jr. et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7298244 | Cress et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7301469 | Hoffman et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
D560533 | Dueker et al. | Jan 2008 | S |
D564387 | Rubin et al. | Mar 2008 | S |
7455419 | Helget et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7563158 | Haschke et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
D631582 | Hwang | Jan 2011 | S |
8072345 | Gallo | Dec 2011 | B2 |
D654387 | Wilson et al. | Feb 2012 | S |
8154424 | Selevan | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8220950 | Sunshine | Jul 2012 | B1 |
D669805 | Edwards et al. | Oct 2012 | S |
D678100 | Hwang | Mar 2013 | S |
8550653 | Wilson et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8564456 | Selevan | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8579460 | Wilson et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8602584 | Ghafoori et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8643511 | Batterson | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8672517 | Chung et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8770774 | Ye et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8786461 | Daudelin | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8949022 | Fahrner et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
9066383 | Gerszberg | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9288088 | McIlroy | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9437109 | Stafford et al. | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9489809 | Dever et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
D778752 | Selevan | Feb 2017 | S |
D778753 | Selevan | Feb 2017 | S |
9835319 | Selevan et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9987981 | Deyaf | Jun 2018 | B1 |
10066808 | Fernando | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10443828 | Selevan et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
20020006313 | Pas | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020008637 | Lemelson et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020036908 | Pederson | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020067290 | Peet, II et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020115423 | Hatae et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020154787 | Rice et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020159251 | Hart | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020175831 | Bergan et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030164666 | Crunk | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040056779 | Rast | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040100396 | Antico et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040113817 | Novak et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040124993 | George | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040183694 | Bauer | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040263330 | Alarcon | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040264440 | Wan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050040970 | Hutchins et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050134478 | Mese et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050210722 | Graef et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050248299 | Chemel et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050254246 | Huang | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060072306 | Woodyard | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060097882 | Brinkerhoff et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060104054 | Coman | May 2006 | A1 |
20060165025 | Singh et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070038743 | Hellhake et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070099625 | Rosenfeld | May 2007 | A1 |
20070115139 | Witte et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070153520 | Curran et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070155139 | Hecht et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070194906 | Sink | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070222638 | Chen et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070222640 | Guelzow et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070250212 | Halloran et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070273509 | Gananathan | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070273552 | Tischer | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080037431 | Werb et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080042866 | Morse et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080091304 | Ozick et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080122607 | Bradley | May 2008 | A1 |
20080122656 | Carani et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080150758 | Vallejo, Sr. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080198038 | Yingst et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080242220 | Wilson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080267259 | Budampati et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090009406 | Chu et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090034258 | Tsai et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090034419 | Flammer, III et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090063030 | Howarter et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090115336 | Wang | May 2009 | A1 |
20090174572 | Smith | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090187300 | Everitt | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100109898 | Kensy et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100259199 | McDermott | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110010094 | Simon | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110175719 | Ford | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110249430 | Stamatatos et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110249688 | Liu | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120051056 | Derks et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120139425 | Kim | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120249341 | Brown et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120256765 | Selevan | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120277934 | Ohtomo et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120287611 | Wilson et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130113634 | Hutchinson et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130114268 | Shigematsu et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130166193 | Goldman et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130214924 | Ko | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130221852 | Bowers et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130260695 | Wang | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130271294 | Selevan | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130293396 | Selevan | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140071681 | Ghafoori et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140126187 | Bennett et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140210373 | Baret | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150009682 | Clough | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150077234 | Fullam | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150117010 | Auen | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150330616 | Preuschl et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150338079 | Preuschl et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150366275 | Cserfoi | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150369456 | Creusen et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160144778 | Tucker | May 2016 | A1 |
20160174099 | Goldfain | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160186971 | Selevan et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160248506 | Ryan et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20170097128 | Stafford | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170124836 | Chung | May 2017 | A1 |
20170151994 | Braunberger | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170160392 | Brisimitzakis et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170287217 | Kim et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170354019 | Julian et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170355300 | Kurata | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180079463 | Pearce | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20190018132 | Decker et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190132709 | Graefe et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20210065530 | Fairweather | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210237777 | Selevan | Aug 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102147954 | Aug 2011 | CN |
105812673 | Jul 2016 | CN |
102008011228 | Aug 2009 | DE |
1531444 | May 2005 | EP |
03-162279 | Jul 1991 | JP |
06-024012 | Mar 1994 | JP |
11260102 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2000-078666 | Mar 2000 | JP |
2005-019013 | Jan 2005 | JP |
3108195 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005113636 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2007501971 | Feb 2007 | JP |
2010157213 | Jul 2010 | JP |
2010221874 | Oct 2010 | JP |
2011-254651 | Dec 2011 | JP |
2012-060464 | Mar 2012 | JP |
2013-131809 | Jul 2013 | JP |
2014-056670 | Mar 2014 | JP |
2014-107230 | Jun 2014 | JP |
2014130409 | Jul 2014 | JP |
2015-041438 | Mar 2015 | JP |
2015-115317 | Jun 2015 | JP |
2015-216050 | Dec 2015 | JP |
3208109 | Dec 2016 | JP |
2017092652 | May 2017 | JP |
201528878 | Jul 2015 | TW |
WO 9821519 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 2003026358 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO2005015520 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2007030852 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO 2009111184 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO2012002163 | Jan 2012 | WO |
WO2012064951 | May 2012 | WO |
WO 2014099953 | Jun 2014 | WO |
WO 2014115541 | Jul 2014 | WO |
WO 2014130842 | Aug 2014 | WO |
WO 2016070193 | May 2016 | WO |
WO2016077812 | May 2016 | WO |
WO2017054162 | Apr 2017 | WO |
WO2019175422 | Sep 2019 | WO |
WO2021104031 | Jun 2021 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Non-Final Office Action Dated Aug. 11, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/775,177. |
Final Office Action Dated May 8, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/774,029. |
Final Office Action Dated Mar. 30, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/775,177. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Sep. 18, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/775,177. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Mar. 25, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/186,582. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Jan. 7, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/522,282. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Jan. 17, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/573,762. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Jan. 22, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/029,379. |
Final Office Action Dated Sep. 5, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/029,379. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Nov. 30, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/177,192. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Apr. 19, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/941,646. |
Office Action Dated Sep. 5, 2023 in corresponding European Patent Application No. 18751574.7. |
Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 19, 2023 in related European Application No. 21738082.3. |
Finley, M.D. et al., “Sequential Warning Light System for Work Zone Lane Closures,” Texas Transportation System, (2011) pp. 1-23. |
Sun, C. et al., “Cost-Benefit Analysis of Sequential Warning Lights in Nighttime Work Zone Tapers”, University of Missouri, Report to the Smart Work Zone Deployment Initiative, Jun. 6, 2011. |
Internet Website Screen Capture, www.empco-lite.com; Sep. 6, 2010. |
PCT International Search Report dated Apr. 27, 2018 in PCT Application No. PCT/US2018/017683. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 28, 2014 in PCT Application US2014/017756. International Filing Date Feb. 21, 2014. |
PCT International Search Report dated Mar. 18, 2016 in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/060770. |
PCT International Search Report dated Oct. 26, 2018 in related PCT Application No. PCT/US2018/041126. |
Extended European Search Report dated Jun. 20, 2018 in related European Application No. 15858697.4. |
Office Action Dated Oct. 23, 2019 in related Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-544855. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Mar. 17, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/381,565. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Nov. 8, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/440,930. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated Oct. 8, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/774,029. |
Non-Final Office Action Dated May 11, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/831,065. |
Final Office Action Dated Dec. 27, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/831,065. |
Final Office Action Dated Apr. 30, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/522,282. |
Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 2, 2020 in related European Application No. 18751574.7. |
Car 2 Car Communications Consortium: “Car 2 Car Communication Consortium Manifesto; Overview of the C2C-CC System, Version 1.1”, Internet Citation, Aug. 2007, pp. 1-94, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://www.car-to-car.org/fileadmin/downloads/C2C-CC_manifesto.v1.1.pdf. |
Jiang, Daniel et al., “Design of 5.9 ghz dsrc-based vehicular safety communication”, IEEE Wireless Commmunications, Coordinated Science Laboratory; Dept. Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, US, vol. 13, No. 5, Oct. 2006, pp. 36-43. |
Caveney, Derek,“Cooperative Vehicular Safety Applications”, IEEE Control Systems Magazine, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ, US, vol. 30, No. 4, Aug. 2010, pp. 38-53. |
Bourkerche, A. et al, “Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks: A New Challange for Localization-Based Systems”, Computer Communications, Elsevier Science Publishers, vol. 31, No. 12, Jul. 2008, pp. 2838-2849. |
Rola Naja, “Wireless Vehicular Networks for Car Collision Avoidance”, in “Wireless Vehicular Networks for Car Collision Avoidance”, May 2013, Springer Verlag, retrieved from the Internet: URL:https://www.springer.com/de/book/9871441995629. |
Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 2, 2021 in related European Application No. 18828265.1. |
Office Action Dated Mar. 3, 2021 in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201880057575.3. |
PCT International Search Report dated Jul. 22, 2021 in PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/012872. |
Office Action Dated Oct. 21, 2021 in corresponding European Patent Application No. 18751574.7. |
Office Action Dated Oct. 11, 2021 in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201880057575.3. |
Office Action Dated Jan. 11, 2022 in related Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-543284. |
Liu, Zhitian et al., “Efficient Single-Layer White Light-Emitting Devices Based on Silole-Containing Polymers,” Journal of Display Technology, Mar. 2013. |
Office Action Dated Feb. 7, 2023 in related Japanese Patent Application No. 2022-068386. |
Office Action Dated May 9, 2023 in related Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-521857. |
PCT International Search Report dated Apr. 26, 2023 in related PCT Application No. PCT/US2022/054158. |
PCT International Search Report dated Jul. 14, 2023 in related PCT Application No. PCT/US2023/012840. |
Office Action Dated Oct. 17, 2023 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2023-005832. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230215258 A1 | Jul 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63294608 | Dec 2021 | US |