Patent Grant
8668989
The present invention relates to bonded vehicular, assemblies comprising glass and other materials that utilize a two-component urethane adhesive to bond dynamic load-bearing attachment members to a panel surface to form a joint suitable for use in a vehicle. In addition, the present invention provides methods of bonding vehicular glass assemblies utilizing the class of adhesives described herein.
Vehicular glass assemblies, particularly large movable van windows, often have one or more components such as hinges or clevises affixed to the glass panel. When such assemblies are installed in vehicles, the assembly components and affixment means are often subjected to highly localized loads including dynamic loads, resulting from road vibration and opening and closing of the glass assembly. Therefore, original equipment manufacturer (OEM) specifications, utilized by most automotive companies to ensure that components supplied are suitable for use in vehicles, have required that components affixed to vehicular glass be able to withstand relatively high loads and severe vibration. At present, the primary method by which to attach such components that meets OEM specifications is by mechanical affixment of the component, e.g., hinge or clevis, to the glass panel. Typically, such mechanical affixment requires forming one or more holes through the glass panel, inserting component fasteners, and then mechanically attaching the components to the glass via the fasteners. In some applications involving wrap-around hinges, the formation of holes is avoided by positioning the hinge over a portion of the outer edge of the glass panel and clamping the hinge to the panel by use by one or more fasteners.
Neither of these approaches is entirely satisfactory in that each is relatively expensive due to the significant amount of time and labor involved in drilling holes and inserting or clamping fasteners, notwithstanding the cost of the additional fasteners or clamps. Moreover, mechanical affixment of components to glass necessitates the use of a mounting member or fastener on the opposite side of the glass from which the component is residing. This is undesirable in terms of both cosmetic appeal and resulting aerodynamics if the mounting member or fastener projects from the exterior surface of the glass panel, particularly as automotive designers strive to improve vehicle aesthetics and aerodynamics such as is useful, for example, in flush glazing of vehicles.
Single component urethane adhesives have been used as a window fixing adhesive to bond glass panels to an automobile body and for mounting glass mounting members. Such adhesives have also been used to attach studs, mirror mounting buttons, and the like to automotive glazing. As known to those skilled in the art, a single component urethane adhesive utilizes a highly prepolymerized isocyanate-rich urethane (typically formed from reacting an isocyanate with a polyol) typically mixed with an isocyanate (usually a polymeric isocyanate). The adhesive initially “sets” and finally “cures” when exposed to moisture in the air which causes the isocyanate moieties to cross-link with the urethane prepolymer(s) via a urea cross-linking reaction. The process usually requires several hours for the adhesive to sec and several days for a complete cure to be effected. Such long set and cure periods present challenges when used in high production race processes, such as automobile module assembly, because curing of the system typically requires temporary or permanent fixturing of the glass or mounting member(s), thus adding cost and extraneous equipment to the manufacturing process. Curing of single component urethanes may also require the use of humidity chambers, and in certain cases, the addition of heat to accelerate bonding which further adds cost, time, inventory, handling, and complexity to the manufacturing process.
Additionally, single-component urethanes, when employed as a window fixing adhesive, limit the range of applications of the resulting vehicular glass assembly. Such bonded assemblies are typically utilized so that only a relatively low load or stress occurs in the adhesive material or at the bond between the glass and the adhesive. Cured, single component urethanes often cannot withstand highly localized loads or high stresses, particularly at extreme environmental conditions such as high temperatures, exposure to moisture, and vibration.
In another respect, single-component urethanes are not entirely satisfactory for forming bonded glass assemblies, since single-component urethanes may induce stresses on the glass upon curing. Such stress increases the likelihood of glass fracture upon application of additional external forces or other stresses thereby rendering such adhesives unsatisfactory for forming joints in dynamic load-bearing applications in a vehicle.
Two-component urethane adhesive systems have been used for bonding fixed vehicle windows, such as windshields, for certain after-market applications. The term “two-component system” refers to urethane adhesive systems in which the isocyanate and polyol components are kept separate from one another until just prior to bonding at which time those components are mixed together and applied on the appropriate surfaces for bonding. Upon mixing the two components, a full urethane polymerization reaction occurs. The problems encountered with two-component systems currently recommended for after-market applications are that such systems are still relatively slow, typically requiring about 1 hour to set and about 3 days to cure, and result in a relatively weak initial bond that does not reach full cure properties for days.
At present, the automotive industry lacks a method for securely attaching load-bearing components, and particularly dynamic load-bearing components, to glass window panels that meets OEM requirements, is aesthetically appealing, is economical, and which avoids the numerous drawbacks of utilizing mechanical attachment methods. Prior art suggestions and attempts have not resulted in any commercially successful two-component urethane adhesive that is suitable for bonding hardware components to glass panels for use in vehicles, particularly for bonding hinges, clevises, and similar attachments typically utilized in large area movable windows, such as those found in automobiles, minivans, sport utility vehicles, trucks, and buses.
In the present invention, a vehicular window assembly suitable for use in a vehicle is provided comprising a glass panel, an attachment member, and a layer of a rapid set, rapid cure, two-component urethane adhesive. In another embodiment, the present invention provides a vehicular panel assembly also suitable for use in a vehicle, the assembly comprising a glass substrate, an attachment member, and a layer of a two-component urethane adhesive including an isocyanate component and a polyol component that form a joint suitable for use on a vehicle. The present invention also provides a moveable window assembly comprising a glass panel, an attachment member, and a layer of a rapid set, rapid cure, two-component urethane adhesive disposed between the panel and attachment member. In yet another embodiment, the present invention provides a window, assembly comprising a glass panel, an attachment member, and a layer of adhesive disposed between the panel and the attachment member, in which the adhesive is capable, upon curing, to form a bond that can withstand a tensile force of at least 5 lbs/in2. The present invention also provides a hinged vehicular window assembly comprising a glass panel and a hinged mounting member that is bonded to the glass panel by the rapid set, rapid cure I two-component urethane adhesive. The present invention further provides a movable window assembly comprising a glass panel and an attachment member bonded to the glass panel by an adhesive comprising an isocyanate component and a polyol component. Moreover, the present invention provides a positionable sunroof a movable door lift window assembly, a liftgate window assembly, and a sliding window assembly all utilizing the adhesives described herein.
The invention also provides a method of adhering an attachment member to a glass surface comprising, in part, depositing the rapid set, rapid cure, two-component urethane adhesive between the attachment member and glass surface and allowing the adhesive to cure. In another embodiment, a method is provided to adhere an attachment member to a glass substrate having a frit layer formed on the glass substrate, by use of the rapid set, rapid cure, two-component urethane adhesive.
The previously described assemblies meet or exceed OEM requirements and can withstand highly localized loads when installed and subjected to typical use in a vehicle.
A preferred embodiment of one aspect of the present invention for bonded glass assemblies is an automobile glass panel having a layer of a rapid set, rapid cure, two-component urethane disposed on the glass panel. Layers of such adhesives and others, described herein have remarkable characteristics upon curing that enable them to be used as joints on automobiles.
In many of the preferred embodiments described herein, the two-component urethane adhesives utilized are “rapid set,” and “rapid cure.” Rapid set refers to a property exhibited by the two-component system, such that after mixing the components and relatively promptly contacting the adhesive mixture with the objects to be bonded together, the objects are held by the adhesive against movement resulting from their own weight or movement resulting from application of a relatively slight force, within about 3 minutes or less, preferably within about 90 seconds or less, and most preferably within about 45 seconds or less from the time of mixing and application of the adhesive to the objects.
The term “rapid cure” refers to a cure time of less than about 60 minutes preferably less than about 50 minutes, and most preferably less than about 40 minutes. That is, at least about 80%, preferably at least about 90%, and most preferably at least about 95% of the physical characteristics of the cured adhesives are obtained within about 60 minutes from the time of achieving the set phase of the adhesive. These two-component urethanes described herein fully cure, or substantially so, within the time periods referred to for rapid cure. That is, the average molecular weight of the polyurethane chains and degree of cross-linking in the adhesive matrix does not significantly change after the period of rapid cure.
The rapid set, rapid cure, two-component adhesives described in greater detail herein will find numerous applications in high production rate manufacturing processes, thereby often eliminating the requirement of fixturing bonded components and otherwise hindering the manufacturing process. These adhesives will withstand relatively high tensile, torque, or shear loads, extreme vibration even under high temperatures and after extended aging and thermal cycling, and resistance to adverse environmental conditions encountered by vehicular window assemblies. The rapid set, rapid cure, two-component urethanes described herein are able to withstand tensile and shear forces of at least 500 psi, preferably 700 psi, and most preferably 800 psi, without separation from the underlying glass, surface or breakage of the glass substrate. These adhesives described in greater detail herein, have been found to be useful for forming bonded assemblies comprising glass and dynamic load-bearing attachment members having low surface area mounting footprints, that are able to withstand relatively high loads or other stresses, significantly beyond the ability of conventional single-component urethanes. Such low surface area mounting footprints are preferably less than about 6 in2 and in some instances, may be less than about 1 in2. In addition, it has surprisingly been discovered that these adhesives do not impart deleterious amounts of stress to the glass substrate to which they are bonded.
Frequent reference is made herein to bonding “attachment members” to glass. The term “attachment member” as used herein refers to any part, accessory, or constituent thereof, to be bonded to glass. In the context of vehicular window assemblies, reference to attachment members includes, but is not limited to, mounting components, hinges, clevises, latches, lift brackets, division bars, guide tracks, handles, guide pins, strut-mounting hardware, strikers, brake lights, power-mounting hardware, rails, gaskets, antennas, wiper mounts, cosmetic articles, and particularly to dynamic load-bearing components having a relatively low surface area mounting footprint. In addition, reference to attachment members includes, but is not limited to, interior accessories such as rearview mirrors, mounting fixtures, and other components suitable for use in automobile passenger compartments.
The preferred embodiment bonded assemblies of glass and attachment member(s), include an automobile glass panel that is bonded by an effective amount of a preferred embodiment adhesive described herein to a mounting component, for example a metal component, affixed to a surface of an automobile body.
The preferred embodiment adhesives described herein may be utilized to bond gaskets to glass panels for fixed mounting applications.
The bonded assemblies described herein are particularly well suited for use as movable vehicular window assemblies. Such assemblies may find application as hinged window assemblies, sunroofs, door lift window assemblies, liftgates and sliding window assemblies. The assemblies may be utilized as movable windows in which one or more glass panel(s), preferably with one or more mounting or hinge-like components, are positionable with respect to a vehicular mounting surface. In many of these embodiments, a rust portion of a positionable member, e.g., hinge or hinged assembly, is bonded to a glass panel by an effective amount of the adhesives described herein. Another portion of the member is affixed or connected to a vehicular mounting surface or other intermediate surface. These various embodiments are described in greater detail as follows.
As previously described, the present invention also encompasses fixed window assemblies that are affixed to or otherwise secured to one or more vehicle mounting surfaces. The preferred embodiment adhesives are well suited for bonding mounting components to glass for such fixed mounting application.
The rapid set, rapid cure, two-component urethane adhesives described herein exhibit surprising and remarkable ability to rapidly bond glass to other materials in such a manner that the resulting bond can withstand highly localized loads without failing. As previously explained, many new window designs require attachment of mounting members or other attachment members to glass which results in highly concentrated static loads and/or dynamic loads at the adhesive bond, as might be the case in a movable window. Often, there is minimal available surface area on the glass or attachment member for bonding. Such minimal surface area limits the available area for distributing these loads and stresses over the adhesive bond. It is even more remarkable that the bonded assemblies described herein, particularly, those utilizing the preferred adhesives, retain their bonded configuration under high loads, while concurrently subjected to adverse conditions such as water immersion, vibration, and temperature extremes. It has been found that bonded assemblies utilizing the rapid set, rapid cure, two-component adhesive described herein can withstand localized static tensile loads of at least 5 lbs/in and as high as about 40 lbs/in and in some instances significantly higher loads such as 80 lbs/in without failing as applied within OEM ranges of −40° C. to 100° C.
A wide array of materials may be bonded to glass by use of the preferred adhesives described herein. Such materials may include for example metals, coated metals, plastics, coated plastics, or composites or combinations thereof.
The thickness of the adhesive layer generally depends upon the end use applications for the bonded assembly, the surface characteristics of the glass substrate and the attachment member to be bonded to the glass, and the required bond strengths. If the adhesive layer is too thick, elongation of the adhesive layer, for instance upon application of a shear stress, allows movement between the bonded components or substrates and may result in creep and/or peel. If the adhesive layer is too thin, the bonded assembly may have poor durability, insufficient squeeze out or component coverage, or other phenomena in which adhesive material migrates away from the bond interface. Moreover, if the thickness of the adhesive layer is not uniform, there may be regions on the surfaces of the bonded components that have insufficient coverage of adhesive, thereby resulting in voids or other undesirable variations in coverage. The preferred thickness for the adhesive layer is from about 0.01 mm to about 4.0 mm, more preferred being from about 0.25 mm to about 2.0 mm and the most preferred thickness being about 0.5 mm to about 1.0 mm.
The preferred embodiment method of adhering attachment members to glass substrates is to prime the glass surface, and deposit an effective amount of a preferred embodiment adhesive described herein on one or both surfaces of the attachment member and primed glass substrate to be bonded, and place the attachment member and substrate in the desired position for bonding. The term “effective amount” refers to an amount of adhesive such that the attachment member that is adhered to the substrate is securely bonded thereto after curing of the adhesive. Typically, an effective amount is an amount that results in an adhesive layer thickness of between about 0.01 mm and about 4.0 rum, more preferably about 0.25 mm to about 2.0 mm, and most preferably from about 0.5 rum to about 1.0 mm.
Preferably, the adhesive is applied to a glass frit layer which is applied to the glass panel. Thus, in forming the glass assemblies described herein, it is preferred that the various assemblies comprise such a glass frit layer on the surface of the glass substrate. The frit layer helps to shield the adhesive applied thereto from the ultraviolet radiation of sunlight. Exemplary descriptions of forming frit layers on glass surfaces are provided in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/898,094 filed Jun. 12, 1992, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 5,443,673, which is herein incorporated by reference.
Optionally, the surface of the glass to be bonded may be cleaned prior to bonding such as by washing with isopropyl alcohol or a suitable detergent followed by drying. Similarly, the surface of the component or other substrate to be bonded to the glass may also be washed and dried prior to bonding.
Referring again to
The preferred adhesive dispensing method is performed by using a metering unit and a mixing unit to both mix and dispense the adhesive. The metering unit should preferably dispense a very accurately controlled volume of each component to the mixing unit. This volume must be constant for a specific flow race such that the ratio of the isocyanate component to the polyol component does not change as the total dispensed volume and flow rate change. Preferred metering units are gear pump-based dispensing units such as those supplied by EMC2 of Sterling, Heights, Mich. The most preferred metering units are adjustable gear pump-based units. The preferred mixing unit may be either a static mix tube or a dynamic urethane RIM mix head like those supplied by Admiral of Canton, Ohio; Cannon of Mars, Pa.; Kraus Maffai of Germany, and others. For applications involving most automotive bonded assemblies, the most preferred mixing unit is a static mix tube 0.25 inches in diameter and 6 inches long, in association with a 24 element KINEX, a sequential reverse static mixer.
In order to promote uniformity and accuracy of dispense volume, mixing and ratio control, it is most preferred that the isocyanate and polyol components of the adhesives described herein be delivered to the dispense metering unit and mixing unit through thermally controlled lines, such as those provided by Hart Ind. Supply of Middletown, Ohio.
It is also preferred that the adhesive material be deposited upon the glass or attachment members to be adhered to the glass, with the aid of a robot. Robotic deposition or other automatic procedures promote repeatability in both application and open time control that manual operation may not be able to deliver. An example of forming a bonded vehicular glass assembly by robotic assembly is described in greater detail below.
It may also be desirable to accelerate the set and cure times of the adhesive. Acceleration of adhesive set and cure times can be accomplished by heating and/or by utilizing chemical agents. The use of chemical agents is discussed in greater detail below. Acceleration by heating may be performed by induction curing, infra red heating, or other methods of heating the adhesive.
In the preferred embodiment of the two-component urethane adhesives described herein, the polyol component utilized includes one or more polyols and one or more high amine density plural amine compounds, hereinafter referred to as HADPACs. The preferred amount of HADPAC typically ranges from about 2% to about 20%, and most preferably from about 5% to about 10% by weight of the polyol component. In addition, the adhesives 25 utilize a filler agent in either the polyol component, the isocyanate component, or both. The filler agent is preferably utilized in an amount from about 15% to about 50% of the total weight of the polyol and isocyanate components. Moreover, the adhesives preferably utilize a particular ratio of isocyanate functionality to hydroxy and/or amino functionality of from about 0.9 to about 2.0, more preferably from about 1.03 to about 1.4, and most preferably from about 1.1 to about 1.3.
A HADPAC is a high amine density plural amine compound that may be either aromatic or nonaromatic, having an amine to carbon ratio of from about 1.0 to about 0.25:1 with the provisos that the compound (a) contain at least 3 amine groups, except if the compound is aromatic, then the compound may contain as few as 2 amine groups due to plate-like stacking phenomenon and (b) the compound contain from 2 to 24 carbon atoms. The molecular weight range for these amines typically ranges from about 115 to about 5000, and more preferably from about 210 to about 290. A particularly preferred HADPAC is a penta-amine or hexamine containing 11 or 12 carbon atoms, such as the aminated reaction product of pentaerythritrol, glucose; or sucrose. The most preferred HADPAC is aminated sucrose or aminated pentaerythritrol. The amination reaction may be performed by reacting pentaerythritrol, glucose, or sucrose, with an excess of, for example, but not limited to, ammonia, methyl amine, ethyl amine, and other amino alkanes of the formula CxHnNH2 where x ranges from about 1 to about 20, and n is such that the alkane is fully saturated. In a preferred embodiment, x is from about 1 to about 6, and most preferably, from about 1 to about 3.
As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, during formation and isolation of a HADPAC, there will typically be a distribution of compounds accompanying the HADPAC. Thus, it is recognized that the function of the HADPAC in the adhesives described herein stems from not only from the HADPAC, but also from the distribution of related compounds accompanying the HADPAC.
Although not wishing to be bound to any particular theory, it is believed that upon curing of the adhesives described herein, cross-linking occurs between the HADPACs, and isocyanate groups to a degree such that a higher cross-link density is achieved in the preferred embodiment adhesives as compared to most other urethane adhesives. The polyols in the polyol component may include polyols such as dials, trials, tetrols, pentols, hexyls, heptols, and octols. Examples of polyol compounds that may be employed in the polyol component include, but are not limited to, propylene glycol, ethylene glycol, glycerine, trimethylolpropane, 1,2,6-hexanetriol, pentaerythritrol, methyl glucoside, sorbitol, and sucrose. It is envisioned that a wide array of polyalkylene glycols (ethylene, diethylene, dipropylene), various glycerine triols and trimethylol propanes, and derivatives thereof could be utilized. Other preferred polyols include polyether or polyester polyols with hydroxyl equivalent weights (hydroxyl equivalent weight is the molecular weight per hydroxyl group in the compound) of between about 50 and about 2000, such as a blend of dials, trials, and pentols and sucrose initiated polyols. For end use applications expected to be exposed to water or moisture, polyether polyols are especially preferred in view of their relatively high degree of hydrolytic stability.
In addition to the previously noted preferred HADPAC, other amines may be utilized in the polyol component. Such amines may be formed by reaction between propylene oxide and/or ethylene oxide, and amine compounds or other nitrogen-containing compounds such as 2.0 ammonia. Examples of suitable amine compounds for such reactions include, but are not limited to triethanol amine, ethylene diamine, toluene diamine, diphenylmethane diamine, diethylenetriamine, aniline, methyldiethanolamine, triethanolamine, trispropanolamine, diethyl toluelene diamine, and other alkyl amines.
Examples of the isocyanate compounds that may be utilized in the isocyanate component include, but are not limited to, diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI), typically polymeric MDI, and its isomers such as 4.4′-MDI 2.2′-MDI and 2,2′-MDI; and tolylene diisocyanate (TDI) and its isomers. It is, also possible to use other isocyanates, either alone or in combination with one or both and TDI. The preferred combination of isocyanates for the isocyanate component is a majority fraction of MDI prepolymers, such as Dow Chemical's PAPI® 27, and minority fraction of monomeric isocyanates, having an iso-equivalent weight between 143 and 181 (iso-equivalent weight is the molecular weight per isocyanate group in the compound), and minority fraction of a mixture of polymeric isocyanates such as a polymeric polyisocyanate available from Dow Chemical, dimers and trimers of MDI, and alternate prepolymers of MDI.
One or more filler agents are incorporated in either the polyol component, the isocyanate component, or both. Although not wishing to be bound to any particular theory, it is believed that the filler agent creates a porous structure within the adhesive, which enables moisture to permeate into and throughout the adhesive to effect isocyanate cross-linking via urea formation with any unreacted isocyanates. The preferred amount of filler agent is from about 15% to about 50% of the total weight of the polyol and isocyanate components. More preferably, the amount of filler agent is from about 20% to about 30% of the total weight of the polyol and isocyanate components. Most preferably, the amount of filler agent is about 25% of the total weight of the polyol and isocyanate components. Examples of suitable filler agents include, but are not limited to, silicates such as magnesium silicate, silicas such as crystalline silica and quartz silica calcium carbonate, talc and combinations thereof. The preferred filler agent is a combination of talc and silica.
A typical urethane adhesive system employs a ratio of isocyanate functionality to hydroxy and/or amino functionality of from about 1.03 to about 1.07. A ratio higher than about 1.07 leads to an adhesive which is excessively brittle and relatively slow curing. A ratio less than about 1.03 leads to a cured adhesive which is too safe for use in most industrial applications. The preferred embodiment adhesives, it has been surprisingly discovered, utilize a ratio of isocyanate to hydroxy and/or amino functionality of from about 0.9 to about 2.0, more preferably from about 1.03 to about 1.4, and most preferably from about 1.1 to about 1.3. These ratios are desirable since by utilizing greater amounts of isocyanate, the resulting cured adhesive has greater heat resistance without sacrificing elongation or tensile strength.
A wide array of optional components may be incorporated in the preferred adhesives depending upon the application and desired end use requirements for the bonded assembly. For example, various UV blockers, stabilizers and absorbers may be incorporated in the adhesives to minimize adhesive degradation from sunlight. Chain extenders may be utilized such as ethylene glycol, butane dial, ethylene diamine, and diethyl toluene diamine. Various cross-linking agents may be utilized such as, but not limited to, oxypropionated sucrose, aliphatic amines, pentarythrathols, aminated polyols or high hydroxyl number materials such as 1,2,6-hexanetriol, I,I,3-trimethylolpropane, and glycerine for example. In addition, pigments or colorants may be added to the adhesives. One or more diluents or thixotropic may be added to the adhesive composition to modify the viscosity and related processing characteristics of the resulting compositions. It may also be desirable that one or more additives such as thermal stabilizers, antioxidants, and surfactants may be utilized in the adhesive. All the foregoing optional components may be added to the polyol component, and where applicable, to the isocyanate component, or to both prior to mixing, or to a third or other component which can be added to the mixture prior to setting to form the desired adhesive.
Depending upon the characteristics desired for the setting and curing phases of the adhesive, it may be desirable to add one or more catalysts to accelerate the setting and curing phases. Examples of catalysts for the adhesives of the preferred embodiment include, but are not limited to, tertiary amines such as 1,4-dinzabicycla[2,2,2]octane (triethylene diamine), N-methylmorphaline, N-ethylmorphaline, triethylamine, N-methyldiethanolamine, N,N-dimethylaminoethanol, N,N-diethylaminoethanol, triethanolamine, tetramethylguanidine, N,N,N′,N′-tetramethylethylenediamine, N,N-dimethyl C10-C16 amine, N,N dimethylcyclohexylamine, N,N-dimethylpiperazine, 1,2,4-trimethylpiperazine, bis-(2-hydroxypropyl)-2-methylpiperazine, bis-(beta-dimethylaminoethyl)ether, and organotin compounds such as stannous octoate, stannous oleate, dibutyltin dilaurate, and dibutyltin diacetate.
There are commercially available urethane adhesives which exhibit the preferred rapid set, rapid cure, and high-strength characteristics, which the present inventors have discovered provide surprisingly superior bonds between glass and other components or materials. One such commercially available two-component urethane adhesive having all the above described properties, and which is the most preferred adhesive, is Essex 73100 isocyanate component, and either 73002 or 73003 polyol component available from Essex Specialty Products, Inc., a subsidiary of The Dow Chemical Company. The Essex 73100 isocyanate component comprises a proprietary polyurethane prepolymer(s) which is believed to primarily comprise prereacted relatively long, branched chain molecules of diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI) reacted with a combination of relatively short and moderate chain length diols, triols, and moderate chain length diamines. It is further believed that the ends of these chain molecules are blocked with isocyanate groups, and there exists a proportion of free MDI molecules that are present and available for reaction. The 73100 component further comprises various fillers, such as magnesium silicate, crystalline silica, and calcium carbonate. The solids content and approximate amount of filler agents in the Essex. 73100 component is about 24%. The Essex 73002 polyol component comprises proprietary polyurethane prepolymer(s) of polyols, dials, N-phenyl diethanolamine, and a penta-amine that is initiated from pentaerythritrol and sucrose molecule, i.e., a HADPAC. The 73002 polyol component further comprises fillers, catalysts, and likely includes surfactants. The fillers are calcium carbonate and quartz silica. The catalyst is an amine-based catalyst. The solids content and approximate amount of filler agents in the 73002 component is 27%.
This most preferred, commercially available adhesive system has a combination of properties and characteristics that render it particularly well suited for use in forming automotive window or panel assemblies and for installing such assemblies in vehicles. The combination of properties include relatively high stability and resistance to water, minimal creep even at relatively high temperatures thereby resulting in a structurally rigid bond, ability to impart remarkably low stress upon the underlying substrate upon curing, and as previously described, relatively fast set and cure times. The present inventor has further found that this adhesive provides surprisingly strong and durable bonds between glass and other materials. The inventor has further found that this adhesive is particularly well suited for fanning bonds between vehicle mounting surfaces and attachment members that are subjected to and which bear dynamic loads.
As previously noted, it may be desirable to utilize an adhesion promotor and/or a primer. Adhesion promoting compounds generally include silanes and amino silanes such as available from Dow Corning, Lord Chemlock, General Electric and Essex. Specific examples include diamino-tri-methoxy silanes available under the designations Lord Chemlock 134/144 and similar materials from Essex such as Essex 435.18 and 435.20. Other silanes not limited to diamino or tri-methoxy forms may also be suitable. A second group of adhesion promoters are titanium or zirconium coupling agents such as available from Kenrich PetroChemical Inc. of Bayon, N.J., which enhance the bonding ability of the adhesive to the substrate. Alternatively, or in addition to an adhesion promoter, one or more primers or single component urethane adhesives may be used such as urethane based, isocyanate-rich, moisture-curable, urethane prepolymers such as Morton Yokohama MS-90 available from Morton International of Ridgewood, Ill. or Essex 435.20a. Additional examples of substrate primers include but are not limited to Essex: 435.32, for applications in which the substrate to be bonded to glass is metal or plastic. Although these adhesion promoters or primers are preferred, they are not the only adhesion promoters or primers available which may be equally if not more suitable for the application.
The adhesion promoter and/or primer applied to the glass surface should form a layer having a thickness such that the entire surface of the area of the glass to be bonded, or substantially so, is wetted by the adhesion promoter or primer. The preferred thickness range for the adhesion promoter or primer materials is from about 0.01 mils to about 3.5 mils, more preferably from about 0.05 mils to about 2 mils, and most preferably from about 0.1 mils to about 1.0 mils. It is undesirable to apply an excessive amount of adhesion promoter or primer on the glass as such leads to interlayer polymeric silane cross-linking. Such silane polymerization results in a much weaker bond than the silane-urethane primer link. Many commercial suppliers for adhesion promoters or primers recommend that after application, of adhesion promoter or primer to the substrate to be bonded, that excess promoter or primer material be wiped off with a clean cloth. This wipe off step results in additional time and labor, which is clearly undesirable at the commercial level. The present inventor has found that a more desirable way of removing excess adhesion promoter or primer material after application is to allow solvents in those materials to flash off. Sufficient flash off was found to occur at ambient temperatures in a period of only from about 5 seconds to about 15 minutes.
One or more layers of adhesion promoters and/or primers are preferably applied to the glass substrate and/or other substrates or attachment members to be bonded thereto prior 25 to bonding. A preferred combination is to utilize an amino silane adhesion promoter, such as Essex 435.18 silane coupling agent, adjacent the glass surface, followed by a layer of a single-component urethane primer, such as Essex 435.20A primer, deposited on the layer of adhesion promoter. The adhesive is then deposited on the primer layer. It is most preferred to apply the two-component urethane adhesive to the adhesion promoter and/or primer within 96 hours of application of the adhesion promoter and/or primer to the glass surface.
A preferred embodiment bonded vehicular glass assembly suitable for use in a Chrysler minivan having a layer of frit and two hinges and a clevis bonded to a glass panel was formed by utilizing robotic assembly and deposition of adhesion promotor, primer, and adhesive as follows. A tempered glass panel is obtained, such as from MaGraw Glass of Detroit, Mich. The glass may be of any suitable grade, such as clear glass, privacy glass, solar tint, or other grades known to those skilled in the art. The glass is coated with a frit layer, such as that available from Cerdac of Wash., Pa. under the designation Cerdac 2247. The glass panel is dimensionally inspected and optically inspected for the existence of scratches, excess frit material, or other contaminating agents.
The glass panel is then placed in a retaining fixture, centered, and positioned for subsequent application of adhesion promoter. It is preferred to utilize an ABE Robot, available from ABB Robotics of Rochester Hills, Mich., a fully programmable multi-axis servo controlled robot, for applying the adhesion promoter, primer, and adhesive. To apply adhesion promoter to the surface of the glass panel, the ABE Robot is fixtured with a Nordson Drip and Drag, a mechanical liquid application device available from Nordson Corporation of Amherst, Ohio. The ABB Robot is programmed to obtain a piece of wool felt from a spool dispenser located near, and preferably above, the fixtured glass panel and wipe the felt material impregnated or loaded with adhesion promoter across desired regions of the glass panel.
Silane adhesion promoter available from Essex under the designation Essex 435.18, IS pumped in small volumes to the surface of the felt. These small volumes are referred to as stitches. The stitches are adjusted such that a sufficient volume of the adhesion promoter is present on the felt to provide a continuous wet streak of adhesion promoter on the glass surface as the felt is wiped over the panel. The amount of the adhesion promoter deposited on the panel surface should be just enough to wet the glass. The adhesion promoter is allowed to flash off, typically for not less than 10 seconds, and not more than 5 minutes. In most instances when utilizing the Essex 435.13 adhesion promoter at room temperatures, flash off occurs in less than about 15 seconds.
After the Essex 435.18 adhesion promoter has been allowed to flash off so that the panel surface is relatively dry, a urethane primer is applied by the ABB Robot. Preferably, the primer is applied to exactly the same area to which the adhesion promoter was deposited upon. The primer is applied in the same fashion as the adhesion promoter. The primer is preferably Essex 435.20A primer.
The primer is allowed to flash off for a time period of typically between about 90 seconds up to about 96 hours. The primer thickness should be controlled to a nominal value of between about 0.1 mils and about 1.5 mils dry thickness. When utilizing Essex 435.20A primer, the typical thickness for this primer layer is between about 0.2 mils and about 0.6 mils dry thickness, and typical flash off time is about 3 minutes.
Upon drying of the primer layer, the glass panel is moved to the urethane bonding area and repositioned if necessary, in the appropriate retaining fixture. The same type of ABS Robot is also preferably programmed to acquire and position the attachment members for bonding to the concave surface of the glass panel, i.e. the two hinges and one clevis. The hinges are preferably of the type illustrated in
The preferred adhesive, Essex 73100/73002 comprising 73100 polymeric isocyanate component and 73002 polymeric polyol component, is metered and mixed in a ratio of 1.3:1, respectively, by the previously described EMC2 dispensing unit and KINEX 24 element static mixer. This ratio allows for an isocyanate excess, or rich mixture which sets in about 90 seconds. The gears of the ENC2 unit are set utilizing 60 and 48 teeth to yield the 1.3:1 dispense ratio. The robot acquires adhesive from the KINEX 24 mixer. The hoses transferring adhesive or adhesive components are preferably thermally jacketed and the dispensing head is set to maintain the adhesive temperature at 95° F.
The robot dispenses about 5.8 cubic centimeters of the mixed two-component urethane adhesive on each hinge, and about 1.2 cubic centimeters on the mounting surface of the clevis. The robot positions the components on the glass surface in less than about 30 seconds from the time of dispense, and typically less than about 17 seconds. The robot then clamps the clevis in place for about 30 seconds, and similarly locates and holds the hinges on the desired location on the glass surface for about 30 seconds. Once the components have been set by the adhesive, the glass is then moved to the end of the production line. The assembly is then placed in a work in progress rack and packed in its shipping container shortly after bonding, e.g. about 7 minutes after bonding.
Bonds formed from the preferred embodiment adhesives described herein exceed bond strength OEM requirements set by most automotive companies and have been successfully tested in actual usage on vehicles. Bonds formed from the preferred embodiment adhesives exhibit exceedingly high-strength against tensile, torque, and shear forces, such that bonded assemblies which have been immersed in a heated water bath for 500 hours can withstand a tensile force of over 795 psi without failure. This is explained in greater detail below in the discussion of experimental comparative testing that was conducted between the most preferred, commercially available two-component urethane adhesive and various single-component urethane adhesives that represent the state of the art for forming bonded automotive glass assemblies.
Testing was performed to compare the bond strength of glass panel to metal attachment members made utilizing the preferred embodiment process with similar glass panel to metal attachments bonded utilizing several single-component urethane adhesives. Bond strength was measured after bonded assemblies, utilizing the various adhesives, were fully immersed in a water bath at 80° C. for 100 or 500 hours. Samples comprised a glass window substrate having clevises adhesively bonded to the glass surface by the various adhesives. Each sample bonded with Essex adhesives utilized a layer of Essex 435.18 silane coupling agent deposited on the glass panel, and a layer of Essex 435.20a primer disposed on the layer of silane coupling agent. Each sample bonded with Morton Yokohama adhesives utilized Morton Yokohama MS-90 primer. In all samples, adhesive was deposited on the primer layer. The water bath consisted of a stainless steel tank fitted with an aeration system and filled with deionized water. The temperature of the bath was maintained at 80° C.±2° C. As evaporation of the water occurred, the tank water level was restored by adding deionized water. Samples were completely immersed in an upright position in the water bath for the specified time period. The samples were adequately spaced from one another to allow water circulation between the assemblies. After immersion in the water bath for the specified time period, the assemblies were removed and subjected to a tensile pull test. The assembly to be tested was placed in a stationary fixture such that the clevis to be pulled from the assembly was aligned with the pulling fixture. The pulling fixture was then attached to the clevis component, and additional adjustments were made with respect to the position of the pulling fixture to ensure that the pulling fixture exerted a tensile force on the bonded component perpendicular to the underlying glass substrate. Pulling was performed at a rate of 25.4 mm per minute until a peak tensile force was reached or failure occurred. The peak tensile force was recorded and, if failure occurred, the mode of failure was noted.
Table 1, as set forth below, summarizes the results of the tensile pull tests performed after immersion in the heated water bath. Metallic clevis components having a circular base with a surface area for bonding of 0.49 in2 and bonded to the glass window substrate were subjected to the tensile pull test previously described. The Essex two-component adhesive, comprising Essex 73100 isocyanate component and Essex 73002 polyol component, is a most preferred adhesive in accordance with the present invention. The other compositions noted in Table 1 are representative of other types of adhesives to which the present invention provides a superior alternative over. Morton Yokohama WS-70FK is a urethane-based, isocyanate-rich, moisture-curable, single-component urethane prepolymer adhesive. Essex 57302 is a moisture-curable, single-component adhesive. Morton Yokohama WS-30 is a moisture-curable, single-component adhesive.
It is clear from a review of Table 1 that the adhesive according to the most preferred embodiment, i.e., Essex 73100 and 73002, provides significantly stronger bonds after immersion in the heated water bath than the conventional single-component adhesives tested. In trial 2, bonded assemblies formed using the adhesive of the most preferred embodiment, i.e., Essex 73100 and 73002 components, after 500 hours of water immersion, withstood a peak tensile force of 286 lbs/in2 without any failures. In contrast, all bonded assemblies formed from the single-component urethane adhesives failed at significantly lower loads. Assemblies formed from the Morton Yokohama WS-70FK adhesive all failed, failure occurring at a peak value of only 130 lbs/in2 Assemblies formed from the Essex 57302 adhesive all failed, failure occurring at a peak value of only 207 lbs/in2 Assemblies formed from the Morton Yokohama WS-30 adhesive all failed, failure occurring at 85 lbs/in2 Similarly, in trial 3, the results were even more striking. Bonded assemblies formed utilizing the most preferred embodiment adhesive withstood a peak tensile force of 795 lbs/in2 without any failures. In contrast, bonded assemblies utilizing the other adhesives all failed, and failed at significantly lower values, i.e., 338, 572, and 236 lbs/in2.
It has surprisingly been found that bonds on glass surfaces formed from the preferred adhesives described herein are exceptionally strong and often exceed the material strength of the component or glass substrate. Components bonded to glass by the methods and adhesives described herein are able to withstand tensile forces of at least 500 psi, preferably 700 psi, and most preferably 795 psi without separation from the underlying glass surface. Such bond strength exceeds OEM tensile bond strength requirements set by most automobile manufacturers, which is typically 300 psi.
Further testing was performed in which maximum torque values before failure were measured for bonded assemblies utilizing the same four adhesives employed in the previously described tensile testing. Each assembly utilized a clevis having a threaded fastener and a ½ inch diameter circular mounting base that was bonded by each of the previously described adhesives, to an appropriately primed glass surface (“appropriately primed” referring to use of the previously described primers I each with its particular adhesive). Two threaded nuts were placed on the threaded fastener portion of each bonded clevis. A torque wrench having a torque indication scale was then used to apply a torque to each bonded clevis until failure occurred.
Additional testing was performed by subjecting a bonded vehicular window assembly to vibration of varying frequency and amplitude while concurrently subjecting the assembly to high and low temperatures. In this test, the bonded vehicular window assembly utilized was a window assembly produced for use as a side window in a Chrysler minivan. The assembly comprised two hinges and a clevis mount bonded to window glass by the adhesive of the most preferred embodiment Essex 73100 and 73002. The glass of the window assembly weighed about 14.5 pounds, was tempered, had a compound curvature, and measured about 22.25 inches in height, 44 inches in length, and about 5 mm in thickness. The window assembly was formed in the same fashion as the previously described preferred embodiment bonded vehicular glass assembly designed for use in a Chrysler Minivan, i.e. by robotic assembly. The two hinges and one clevis were attached to the concave surface of the glass panel. The window assembly was installed in a window fixture, or window buck. The bonded assembly was subjected to input vibration levels of +10 dB, +11 dB, and +12 dB, at varying frequencies, while concurrently being subjected to temperature cycling over a 12 hour period. Each vibration input profile consisted of sequentially administering nine different frequencies, namely 5, 10, 13, 17, 21, 23, 39, 72, and 1000 hertz, to the assembly being tested. The administration of each vibration input profile was repeated over the duration of the test.
In a first trial, the bonded assembly was subjected to the previously described vibration input profile at an amplitude of +10 dB for a period of 24 hours. During the first half of this trial, i.e., the first 12 hours, the temperature was varied in 2 hour increments at −30° C. and 2 hours at 80° C. until the 12 hours was completed. Thus, for instance the bonded assembly subjected to the vibration input profile of the nine different frequencies repeated over the duration of the test at an amplitude of +10 dB experienced a temperature of −30° C. for 2 hours, then a temperature of 80° C. for 2 hours, then a temperature of −30° C. for another 2 hours, then a temperature of 80° C. for 2 hours, then a temperature of −30° C. for another 2 hours, and lastly, a temperature of 80° C. for 2 hours. The bonded assembly passed this first trial of the test without failure.
After being subjected to the previously described conditions, the bonded assembly was then further subjected to a second 12 hour trial utilizing the same vibration frequency and amplitude input profile as noted above, but even more severe temperature extremes. The second 12 hour temperature cycle for the +10 dB level consisted of repeated exposure in 2 hour increments to temperatures of −40° C. and 100° C. until the 12 hours was completed. This assembly passed this portion of the test without failure.
The assembly was then subject to a second trial, utilizing the same vibration frequency and temperature conditions as the first trial for the same time period of 24 hours. Instead of a vibration amplitude of +10 dB, an amplitude of +11 dB was utilized. The assembly passed this portion of, the test without failure.
In a third trial, the bonded assembly comprising the most preferred embodiment adhesive was subjected to the previously described vibration input profile at an amplitude of +12 dB. Temperature cycling was performed by repeated exposure to temperatures of −40° C. and 100° C. for 2 hour periods as described before for a total time of 24 hours. The assembly passed this test without failure. In another vibration test, a window assembly produced for use as a side window in a Chrysler minivan utilizing Essex 73100 and 73002 adhesive components, was subjected to a vibration frequency of 10-50 hertz at +8 dB for 20 hours while the temperature was varied from −30° C. to 80° C. The bonded assembly did not fail. In another vibration test, a similar bonded assembly utilizing Essex 73100 and 73002 components, was subjected to a vibration frequency of 10-50 hertz at +9 dB for 20 hours. The bonded assembly was exposed to temperatures of −40° C. and 100° C. The bonded assembly did not fall.
In yet another vibration test, a similar bonded assembly utilizing Essex 73100 and 73002 components was subjected to a vibration frequency of 10-50 hertz at +10 dB for 20 hours. During vibration testing, the bonded assembly was subjected to temperatures of −40° C. and 100° C. The bonded assembly did not fail.
In yet another vibration test, bonded assemblies were vibrated at room temperature, that is about 20° C., for an extended period of time. Each assembly consisted of a clevis having a the a ¼ inch diameter circular mounting base bonded to an appropriately primed 2 inches×5 inches glass substrate, with either Essex 57100 and 57002 adhesive or Essex 57302 adhesive. After formation of the bonded assemblies, they were aged for a period of 5 weeks while subjected to thermal cycling in accordance with Ford Motor Co. testing specification ESB-M11P33-A Section 3.2.8.
Vibration testing was performed by inducing a vibratory motion to the glass substrate, at frequency of 13 hertz and an amplitude of 0.20 inch, while an 18 pound load was applied to the clevis. The bonded assembly was oriented in a vertical position, i.e., glass substrate in a vertical position, and the 18 pound weight suspended from the clevis bonded to the glass. While in this configuration, the bonded assembly was subjected to the previously noted vibration conditions. Testing was conducted until failure occurred or until at least 100,000 cycles were completed. Table 2 set forth below, illustrates the superior performance of the Essex 57100 and 57002 system over the Essex 57302 system. All but one bonded sample utilizing the most preferred embodiment adhesive successfully withstood over 100,000 vibration cycles before the test was stopped. The bonded assemblies employing the Essex 57302 single component, moisture-curable adhesive all failed before reaching 30,000 cycles. The failure observed was cohesive failure of the adhesive material itself, that is no failure at the bond interface, but instead occurring within the adhesive material.
In another vibration test, similar in all respects to the previously described testing summarized in Table 2, bonded assemblies were subjected to testing at 80° C. Testing was conducted until failure occurred or until at least 100,000 cycles were completed. Table 3 set forth below illustrates the remarkable performance of the most preferred embodiment adhesive under high temperature conditions. Only one sample failed, the remaining five successfully withstanding over 100,000 cycles. In contrast, the bonded assemblies utilizing the Essex 57302 adhesive all failed (cohesive failure of the adhesive material) before reaching 21,000 cycles.
Further testing was performed to compare the bond strength of glass to metal bonds formed by the preferred embodiment process, with similar glass and metal assemblies bonded utilizing the single-component urethane adhesives described in the first series of tests, after exposure to various environmental conditions. In all the tests described below, bonded samples were prepared and tests performed as in the previously described tensile pull tests.
Heat age tests were performed by placing samples to be tested in a forced air heating chamber having means for controlling the temperature within +/−20 C. The bonded assemblies, formed from the same adhesives listed in Table 1 were aged for periods of 168 or 336 hours at 800 C. After aging, the bonded assemblies were subjected to tensile testing. In all instances the adhesive according to the most preferred embodiment. i.e., Essex 73100 and 73002, performed at least as well as or better than the other single-component urethanes.
Humidity adhesion testing was performed in which bonded assemblies, formed from the same adhesives listed in Table 1, were placed in a chamber at 33° C. with an atmosphere having a relative humidity of 95% to 100% for various periods of time. Testing was performed in accordance with Chrysler test specification LP 463PB-9-01. In all instances the 5 adhesive according to the most preferred embodiment, i.e., Essex 73100 and 73002, performed at least as well as or better than the single-component urethanes. The most preferred embodiment adhesive generally performed better than both Morton Yokohama adhesives, WS-70FK and WS-30, in that it exhibited a lower failure rate.
Environmental cycling tests were performed by exposing the bonded samples to five repeated cycles of 16 hours at 80° C., 24 hours at 38° C. and relative humidity of 98% to 100%, and 8 hours at −29° C. The tests were performed in accordance with Chrysler testing specification LP 435CB-10-01. In all instances the adhesive according to the most preferred embodiment, i.e., Essex: 73100 and 73002, performed as well as or better than the conventional single-component urethanes.
Additional testing was performed in which bonded assemblies utilizing Essex 73100 and 73002, Morton Yokohama WS-70FK, Essex 57302, and Morton Yokohama WS-30 were exposed to a temperature of −30° C. for 192 hours. Resistance to acetic acid, salt spray, and windshield washer solvent were also tested. In all instances, assemblies formed according to the preferred process described herein and utilizing the Essex 73100 and 73002 components, performed at least as well as or better than assemblies utilizing the conventional adhesives, 57302, WS-70FK, and WS-30.
Stress testing of bonded assemblies was performed upon bonded assemblies, each utilizing one of the four previously described adhesives, i.e. Essex. 73100 and 73002, Morton Yokohama WS-70FK, Essex 57302, and Morton Yokohama WS-30, to bond clevis attachments to appropriately primed, untempered glass surfaces. After sufficient curing of each assembly, the bonded assembly was visually examined for stress as follows. Each bonded assembly was positioned adjacent a source of polarized light, and light directed toward the area of glass having the cured adhesive deposited thereon. The region of untempered glass surrounding the cured adhesive was visually examined by use of a polarization filter. Stress imparted to the glass would be indicated by stress lines appearing in the glass, which are observable by use of the polarization filter. Bonded assemblies utilizing Morton Yokohama adhesives and the Essex 57302 adhesive exhibited relatively large amounts of stress imparted to the glass. Surprisingly, the bonded assembly utilizing two-component Essex adhesive 73100 and 73002 displayed virtually no stress imparted to the glass.
In another series of tests, lateral shear values were measured for two-bonded assemblies over the curing period of each adhesive utilized in each assembly.
The previously described window assemblies produced for Chrysler and utilizing the Essex 73100 and 73002 two-component system for bonding various attachment members to the glass panels of the assemblies, were installed as side windows in Chrysler minivans. The vehicles were then subjected to a battery of road tests and accelerated environmental performance tests by Chrysler. Installed window assemblies successfully passed Chrysler testing.
The preferred embodiment bonded assemblies and panel assemblies described herein may be incorporated in vehicles such as automobiles, trucks, vans, minivans, and utility vehicles; recreational vehicles such as motor homes, campers, and trailers; other vehicles such as buses, trolleys, trains, commuter vehicles, and airplanes; marine vehicles such as boats and other watercraft; and nearly any structure utilizing a glass panel or substrate for which there exists a need to securely adhere other components to, or to securely affix one or more glass panels thereto. Such window panel assemblies are especially useful in a variety of vehicles and especially for large area windows, and particularly for large area flush-mounted glazings, such as are used as front, rear, and side windows, and as sunroofs, in automobiles, minivans, vans, trucks, and buses and which utilize a window panel that weighs at least about 3 kilograms (with a window panel weight of at least 5 kilograms common for front and rear windows, and for side windows on minivans and larger vehicles) and with a window panel area of at least about 250 square inches.
It is contemplated that the adhesives described herein could be used to form an architectural window assembly comprising a frame containing one or more glass panels bonded to the frame by an effective amount of the adhesive, as described herein. In the preferred embodiment, the frame is formed from steel or other comparable metal. The frame may contain a plurality of glass panels to form a multi-pane architectural window. Each glass panel is bonded to the frame by an effective amount of adhesive, which preferably is the rapid set, rapid cure, two-component urethane adhesives described herein. Alternatively, or in addition, each glass panel may be bonded to a mounting rail disposed on the frame or other substrate by a layer of adhesive. It is further contemplated that the adhesives described herein could be utilized to form an architectural window assembly that does not require a frame. In this embodiment, two or more glass panels are separated by a spacer member disposed between the panels and generally along the perimeter of the panels. An effective amount of the previously described adhesive is used to bond each panel to the spacer to form the window assembly. In these architectural window assemblies, it is preferred that all condensable gases, e.g., water vapor, in the region between the panels are evacuated, or one or more inert gases injected therein to displace such gases, so that condensation does not occur in that region.
It is contemplated that the bonded assemblies described herein will find widespread application in vehicle window assemblies; architectural and residential window assemblies; home and industrial appliances including, but not limited to, washing machines, dryers, ovens, stoves, and refrigerators; and in furniture utilizing bonded glass construction.
Of course, it is understood that the foregoing are merely preferred embodiments of the invention and that various changes and alterations can be made without departing from the spirit and broader aspects thereof as set forth in the appended claims, which are to be interpreted in accordance with the principals of patent law including the Doctrine of Equivalents.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/178,163, filed Jul. 7, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,322,073, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/946,314, filed Nov. 15, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,048,529, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/969,561, filed Jan. 4, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,838,115, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/847,088, filed May 17, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,332,225, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/054,016, filed Nov. 13, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,846,039, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/520,582, filed Mar. 8, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,319,344, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/213,706, filed Dec. 17, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,068,719, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/924,405, filed Aug. 22, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,853,895, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/420,233, filed Apr. 11, 1995, abandoned, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 226770 | Morse | Apr 1880 | A |
| 675762 | Walradt | Jun 1901 | A |
| 1199868 | Browne | Oct 1916 | A |
| 1763603 | Donahue | Jun 1930 | A |
| 1809132 | Martin | Jun 1931 | A |
| 1963941 | Duffy | Jun 1934 | A |
| 2253818 | Simpson | Aug 1941 | A |
| 2282980 | Guy | May 1942 | A |
| 2390260 | King | Dec 1945 | A |
| 2502970 | Manning | Apr 1950 | A |
| 2507965 | Eichner | May 1950 | A |
| 2555204 | Sorrell | May 1951 | A |
| 2566745 | Parsons | Sep 1951 | A |
| 2592411 | Frohnapel | Apr 1952 | A |
| 2597539 | Smart | May 1952 | A |
| 2608926 | Helsley | Sep 1952 | A |
| 2617481 | Frohnapel | Nov 1952 | A |
| 2679201 | Scharmen | May 1954 | A |
| 2701162 | Kliger | Feb 1955 | A |
| 2701631 | Stouder et al. | Feb 1955 | A |
| 2721361 | Ryan et al. | Oct 1955 | A |
| 2721636 | Ordorica et al. | Oct 1955 | A |
| 2738838 | Sutter | Mar 1956 | A |
| 2770312 | Silverman | Nov 1956 | A |
| 2781835 | Westman | Feb 1957 | A |
| 2829081 | Sweem | Apr 1958 | A |
| 2836457 | Beerman et al. | May 1958 | A |
| 2894784 | Howard | Jul 1959 | A |
| 2946098 | Migheault et al. | Jul 1960 | A |
| 2948015 | Hansen | Aug 1960 | A |
| 2996221 | Grise | Aug 1961 | A |
| 3032808 | Fleming | May 1962 | A |
| 3052496 | Frey | Sep 1962 | A |
| 3134112 | Hage | May 1964 | A |
| 3155204 | Campbell et al. | Nov 1964 | A |
| 3237250 | Scoville | Mar 1966 | A |
| 3274740 | Hall | Sep 1966 | A |
| 3282014 | Bamford et al. | Nov 1966 | A |
| 3321234 | Harrell et al. | May 1967 | A |
| 3332169 | Lohr et al. | Jul 1967 | A |
| 3333362 | Kostin et al. | Aug 1967 | A |
| 3342246 | Reiss | Sep 1967 | A |
| 3343867 | Couch et al. | Sep 1967 | A |
| 3376670 | Jones | Apr 1968 | A |
| 3384997 | Heeter | May 1968 | A |
| 3427770 | Kunert et al. | Feb 1969 | A |
| 3440765 | Eskra et al. | Apr 1969 | A |
| 3440892 | Eskra | Apr 1969 | A |
| 3448486 | Wright | Jun 1969 | A |
| 3468738 | Deisenroth | Sep 1969 | A |
| 3478475 | Strack | Nov 1969 | A |
| 3559604 | Ruehleman et al. | Feb 1971 | A |
| 3590332 | Anderson et al. | Jun 1971 | A |
| 3617814 | Stanback | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3628828 | Page et al. | Dec 1971 | A |
| 3631630 | Buffington et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
| 3635100 | Littman | Jan 1972 | A |
| 3636671 | Hollister | Jan 1972 | A |
| 3662429 | Johnson et al. | May 1972 | A |
| 3675085 | Stanback | Jul 1972 | A |
| 3678625 | Vance | Jul 1972 | A |
| 3678626 | Heikel | Jul 1972 | A |
| 3686794 | Sakamoto et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
| 3707521 | De Santis | Dec 1972 | A |
| 3713578 | Johnson | Jan 1973 | A |
| 3714127 | Fabris et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
| 3724132 | Romberg | Apr 1973 | A |
| 3737355 | Epstein et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
| 3740897 | Johns | Jun 1973 | A |
| 3759004 | Kent | Sep 1973 | A |
| 3768207 | Mongelli et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
| 3770312 | Shadburn | Nov 1973 | A |
| 3774363 | Kent | Nov 1973 | A |
| 3779794 | De Santis | Dec 1973 | A |
| 3784243 | Pastva, Jr. | Jan 1974 | A |
| 3791072 | Miller | Feb 1974 | A |
| 3791074 | Waffenschmidt | Feb 1974 | A |
| 3806188 | Tantlinger | Apr 1974 | A |
| 3808742 | Ehret et al. | May 1974 | A |
| 3819560 | Kehr | Jun 1974 | A |
| 3825053 | Romberg | Jul 1974 | A |
| 3827184 | Pennec et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
| 3835585 | Anderson et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
| 3837984 | Wagner et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
| 3867790 | Frank | Feb 1975 | A |
| 3874118 | Robinson | Apr 1975 | A |
| 3875700 | Street | Apr 1975 | A |
| 3881303 | Krafka et al. | May 1975 | A |
| 3885072 | Zibritosky | May 1975 | A |
| 3892713 | Burkus et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
| 3893260 | Cadiou | Jul 1975 | A |
| 3893261 | Cribben | Jul 1975 | A |
| 3900965 | Mummert | Aug 1975 | A |
| 3903567 | Suska | Sep 1975 | A |
| 3906670 | Burton | Sep 1975 | A |
| 3908311 | Romberg | Sep 1975 | A |
| 3916055 | Wagner | Oct 1975 | A |
| 3927727 | Hanagan | Dec 1975 | A |
| 3947999 | Disperens | Apr 1976 | A |
| 3962827 | Chaffee | Jun 1976 | A |
| 3967424 | Gates | Jul 1976 | A |
| 3974753 | Blomgren et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
| 3979364 | Rowton | Sep 1976 | A |
| 3990196 | Eddins | Nov 1976 | A |
| 4004050 | Rabito et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
| 4014072 | Schumacher | Mar 1977 | A |
| 4031049 | Hirosawa et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
| 4047467 | Lundin | Sep 1977 | A |
| 4067605 | Green et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4072340 | Morgan | Feb 1978 | A |
| 4073093 | Ookawa et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
| 4081926 | Jardin | Apr 1978 | A |
| 4084347 | Brown | Apr 1978 | A |
| 4087940 | Voegele, Jr. | May 1978 | A |
| 4093304 | Ziegler | Jun 1978 | A |
| 4095640 | Beckerer, Jr. | Jun 1978 | A |
| 4097442 | Kieft et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
| 4098024 | Naka | Jul 1978 | A |
| 4098025 | Stock et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
| 4099511 | McIntire et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
| 4104825 | Hosmer | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4106239 | Bancroft et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4110268 | Longley et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4115901 | Schmidt | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4115955 | Aldrich | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4116483 | Kramer et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4118827 | Yamamoto | Oct 1978 | A |
| 4118894 | Kennedy et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
| 4119341 | Cook | Oct 1978 | A |
| 4120598 | Zernig et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
| 4124054 | Spretnjak | Nov 1978 | A |
| 4124954 | Redick | Nov 1978 | A |
| 4126965 | Hoffman | Nov 1978 | A |
| 4127968 | Trulaske | Dec 1978 | A |
| 4130966 | Kujawa, Jr. et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
| 4132033 | Esposito | Jan 1979 | A |
| 4132035 | Frambach | Jan 1979 | A |
| 4137669 | Nunlist | Feb 1979 | A |
| 4139234 | Morgan | Feb 1979 | A |
| 4157634 | Coulston | Jun 1979 | A |
| 4158270 | Cherbourg et al. | Jun 1979 | A |
| 4167088 | Governale | Sep 1979 | A |
| 4167259 | Bury | Sep 1979 | A |
| 4169731 | Noshiro et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
| 4170847 | Pickles | Oct 1979 | A |
| 4171594 | Colanzi | Oct 1979 | A |
| 4175357 | Goldhaber | Nov 1979 | A |
| 4177540 | Gorton | Dec 1979 | A |
| 4180644 | Marquis et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
| 4186460 | Artman | Feb 1980 | A |
| 4186524 | Pelchat | Feb 1980 | A |
| 4200328 | Morgan | Apr 1980 | A |
| 4201411 | Morgan | May 1980 | A |
| 4208755 | Shepherd | Jun 1980 | A |
| 4216051 | Brown et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
| 4219230 | Lapine | Aug 1980 | A |
| 4223482 | Barroero et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
| 4226052 | DeStepheno | Oct 1980 | A |
| 4235117 | Pickles | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4243262 | Tokunaga et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
| 4248489 | Barroero et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4255901 | Stenberg | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4263749 | McDougle | Apr 1981 | A |
| 4272934 | Cowden et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4274901 | Elber | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4284751 | Hutt et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
| 4294498 | Van Luit | Oct 1981 | A |
| 4296961 | Hunt et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
| 4300752 | Schultz | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4314721 | Clark | Feb 1982 | A |
| 4317312 | Heideman | Mar 1982 | A |
| 4320221 | Hoffman | Mar 1982 | A |
| 4322914 | McGaughey | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4325203 | Wicks | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4328643 | Bell | May 1982 | A |
| 4345607 | Contreras et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4350803 | Penn | Sep 1982 | A |
| 4358011 | Buschbom et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4358151 | Wood | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4363191 | Morgan | Dec 1982 | A |
| 4364214 | Morgan et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
| 4364595 | Morgan et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
| 4371204 | George et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4373294 | Kennedy et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4387923 | Choby et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
| 4389818 | Sakamoto | Jun 1983 | A |
| 4391065 | Rice | Jul 1983 | A |
| 4391653 | Takechi et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
| 4392330 | Buhr | Jul 1983 | A |
| 4396221 | Morgan et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4403452 | Urbanick | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4405173 | Piano | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4406087 | Asaka et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4407093 | Spretnjak et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4414052 | Habata | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4419844 | Kreisfeld | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4422688 | Kameoka | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4424605 | Squires | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4431790 | Umeda et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
| 4433866 | Hagiwara | Feb 1984 | A |
| 4433930 | Cosenza | Feb 1984 | A |
| 4438609 | Neilson et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4438993 | Rabas | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4443973 | Naka | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4444976 | Rabito | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4447985 | Weber et al. | May 1984 | A |
| 4457046 | Vater | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4457111 | Koike | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4469370 | Petersen | Sep 1984 | A |
| 4478005 | Mundschenk | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4483102 | Edwards | Nov 1984 | A |
| 4484773 | Lehne | Nov 1984 | A |
| 4489127 | Gutek et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4495731 | Sears | Jan 1985 | A |
| 4500606 | Rabito et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4502248 | Thomas, Jr. et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4502249 | Banford | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4505054 | Clark et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4511129 | Kishino | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4511626 | Schumacher | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4512124 | Banford | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4532973 | DeFalco | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4534587 | Fleming | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4538379 | Vargo | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4539345 | Hansen | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4543747 | Kaltz et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4543755 | Crandell | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4544171 | Kellogg | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4545522 | Kerzner | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4553360 | Colombo | Nov 1985 | A |
| 4555867 | Stibolt | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4561223 | Gold et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4562668 | Karhu et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4566222 | Hatvany | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4569553 | Speth | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4571278 | Kunert | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4572872 | Yamazaki et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4573287 | Hagemeyer et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4576670 | Schade et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4582738 | Kunert | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4591204 | Gallitzendoerfer et al. | May 1986 | A |
| 4600254 | Whalen | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4606159 | Kunert | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4608778 | Shiraishi et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4608780 | Van Noy | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4610109 | Ruigrok | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4618067 | Cohn et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4618176 | Farmont | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4621469 | Kruschwitz | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4623738 | Sugerman et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4625459 | Warner | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4626475 | Goel et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4629265 | Chester | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4634196 | Nestell | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4635398 | Nakamura | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4635415 | Schumacher et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4638596 | Gallardo | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4643794 | Saracsan et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4648636 | Reynard | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4651382 | Krolick | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4660325 | Bauer et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4668008 | Stinson | May 1987 | A |
| 4671013 | Friese et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4672100 | Schönbächler et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4674231 | Radek et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4684167 | Newmayer | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4692838 | Merchant | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4697841 | Klein et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4700525 | Nieboer et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4703099 | Regelman | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4704970 | Sanderson et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4712341 | Harris, Jr. et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4723809 | Kida et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4727702 | Baker et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4738052 | Yoshida | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4743672 | Goel | May 1988 | A |
| 4749120 | Hatada | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4755251 | Cline et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4756767 | Soni et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4761916 | Sanok et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4762904 | Nakama | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4775570 | Ohlenforst et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4776132 | Gold | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4777699 | Hill et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4778702 | Hutter, III | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4778845 | Tschan et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4781609 | Wilson et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4785499 | Giuffrida et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4785583 | Kawagoe et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4793098 | Wilkerson | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4793099 | Friese et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4793886 | Okamura et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4799344 | Francis | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4799730 | Harasaki | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4809425 | Monforte | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4810025 | Riley | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4811532 | Fratti et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4813182 | Daniels et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4817585 | Craver | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4819377 | Bauer et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4820810 | Klein et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4822656 | Hutter, III | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4823512 | Maekawa et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4826239 | Nishikawa et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4828315 | Muirhead | May 1989 | A |
| 4835907 | Heuchert | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4839122 | Weaver | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4841698 | Gold | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4848570 | Gosciniak | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4850142 | Sasamura et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4858988 | Morgan et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4861540 | Nieboer et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4864689 | Brockhaus | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4876132 | Kunert | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4876952 | Kuno et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4878314 | Blockinger | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4879853 | Braendle et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4881773 | Ichinose | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4889175 | Frey et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4894972 | Endoh et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4903455 | Veazey | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4905345 | Lunenschloss | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4907667 | Yamamoto et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4909869 | Sakamoto et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4910071 | Kunert | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4912807 | Futch et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4918865 | Hirai | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4918866 | Pastva | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4920698 | Friese et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4922660 | Omelchuk | May 1990 | A |
| 4923232 | Kawagoe et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4923756 | Chung et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4925237 | Bohm et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4927207 | Kishino | May 1990 | A |
| 4933032 | Kunert | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4934098 | Prouteau et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4941286 | Marscholl et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4948206 | Fitzpatrick | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4949507 | Vaughan | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4950715 | Duck et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4951907 | Gold | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4954199 | Rains et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4955659 | Kosugi | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4956954 | Horgan, Jr. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4962615 | Birdling | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4963220 | Bachmann et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4963636 | Mulhaupt et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4970911 | Ujihara et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4979264 | Ramsauer | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4985535 | Takada et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4986595 | Gold | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4987699 | Gold | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4994315 | Schreiber et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 4994540 | Boerner et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 4995195 | Olberding et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 4995666 | Schürmann | Feb 1991 | A |
| 4998612 | Halsey et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5002806 | Chung | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5005317 | Saint-Louis Augustin et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5007201 | D'Hoore et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5008311 | Janoski | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5016721 | Yamamoto et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5023668 | Kluy et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5028082 | Kronbetter | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5035025 | Morris | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5035082 | Butler | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5035084 | Towns | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5042855 | Bennett et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5042871 | Gotanda et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5046283 | Compeau et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5046284 | Harper | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5050928 | Bohm et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5054241 | Mishima et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5054242 | Keys et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| RE33741 | Boissevain | Nov 1991 | E |
| 5062248 | Kunert | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5063638 | Howard et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5064494 | Duck et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5069512 | Sykes | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5072984 | Jackson | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5076637 | Larkin et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5082736 | Bravet et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5085021 | Kunert | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5092492 | Centea | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5096255 | Leischner | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5099611 | Kracht et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5112877 | Barker et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5121824 | Halsey et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5125207 | Strobl, Jr. et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5125716 | Smith et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5131349 | Keller et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5136812 | Voegele | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5137770 | Rothe et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5140771 | Moy et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5143996 | Chung et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5146712 | Hlavaty | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5147927 | Baghdachi et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5150943 | Gold | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5154028 | Hill et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5161419 | Moy et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5170586 | Ose et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5171051 | Yada | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5171818 | Wilson | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5185402 | Fleming et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5187837 | Gunderson et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5187897 | Maidment | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5193308 | Davidian | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5199218 | McQuade | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5201822 | Chen | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5205072 | Eutebach | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5206331 | Tsuno et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5207036 | Sampson et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5212907 | Van Sandt | May 1993 | A |
| 5214877 | Kaspar et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5214878 | Watt | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5215349 | Horton | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5217786 | Keys | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5227409 | Mobley et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5228740 | Saltzman | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5231948 | Malmanger et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5232532 | Hori | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5236650 | Choby et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5238264 | Barnes | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5239406 | Lynam | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5242518 | Riederer | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5245788 | Riegelman | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5261721 | Conger et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5263280 | Dilcher | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5274881 | DeRosa | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5279882 | Daude et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5291710 | Golen | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5294168 | Kronbetter | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5299616 | Sholtz | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5302333 | Capriotti et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5304623 | Ito et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5310796 | Warren et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5327682 | Holtz | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5333411 | Tschirschwitz et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5338767 | Sartelet et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5342867 | Ryan et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5342873 | Merz et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5345717 | Mori et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5349040 | Trinks et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5355625 | Matsuoka | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5355627 | Katz | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5363596 | Kronbetter | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5367036 | Saito et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5368378 | Curtis | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5385061 | Moy et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5385383 | Kreis et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5388372 | Zanoni | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5388424 | Chopko et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5392565 | Rentschler | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5394649 | Lindgren et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5398449 | Kobrehel et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5401453 | Moretz et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5413317 | Spoerre | May 1995 | A |
| 5413397 | Gold | May 1995 | A |
| 5419085 | Imbur | May 1995 | A |
| 5421124 | Zuccaro | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5426897 | Gazaway | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5428925 | Snyder | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5428968 | Tetsukawa et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5430982 | Bane | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5442880 | Gipson | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5443673 | Fisher et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5451090 | Brodie et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5457913 | Gold | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5459185 | Nakata et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5467560 | Camp et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5473840 | Gillen et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5473842 | Hillery | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5475956 | Agrawal et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5476626 | Miyama et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5483771 | Herbst | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5492951 | Beyrle et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5505023 | Gillen et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5508111 | Schmucker | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5522191 | Wenner et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5523877 | Lynam | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5529655 | Bravet et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5531046 | Kollar et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5537782 | Klippert et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5542214 | Buening | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5544458 | Fisher et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5548056 | Chung | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5551193 | Barnett | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5551197 | Repp et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5567530 | Drujon et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5591528 | Fisher et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5595025 | MacPhail-Fausey | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5611180 | Agrawal et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5613322 | Kobrehel | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5613323 | Buening | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5613325 | Mariel | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5617675 | Kobrehel | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5618080 | Sullivan | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5623785 | Mariel | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5631318 | Ito et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5647094 | Mariel | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5657580 | Kobrehel | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5669181 | Kollar et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5671501 | Laramie | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5680245 | Lynam | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5680728 | Moy | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5704173 | Repp et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5707473 | Agrawal et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5711112 | Barten et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5723205 | Millette et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5724769 | Cripe et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5724771 | Gipson | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5735089 | Smith et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5743959 | Ash et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5744557 | McCormick et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5747581 | Proebester et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5749174 | Mariel | May 1998 | A |
| 5763011 | Miyama et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5775029 | Buening | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5784832 | LeeVan | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5784833 | Sponable et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5787643 | Schmuck | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5799444 | Freimark et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5799449 | Lyons et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5804018 | Fisher et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5809706 | Neaux | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5822921 | Griepenstroh et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5822922 | Grumm et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5832667 | Buening et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5836110 | Buening | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5839231 | Gebhart et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5853895 | Lewno | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5864419 | Lynam | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5864987 | Mariel et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5864996 | Veldman et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5887393 | Vanark et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5896704 | Neag | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5915780 | Kobrehel et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5916600 | Dubay et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5934022 | Faubert | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5941022 | Schmuck | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5966874 | Repp et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5986797 | Lynam | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5996284 | Freimark et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6000814 | Nestell et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6014840 | Ray et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6018913 | Lin | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6021605 | Laux et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6026611 | Ralston et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6032990 | Stone et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6038819 | Klein | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6039390 | Agrawal et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6054001 | Swanson et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6068719 | Lewno | May 2000 | A |
| 6086138 | Xu et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6089646 | Xu et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6112462 | Kolar | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6119401 | Lin et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6119402 | Wisner | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6120274 | Gerig et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6122093 | Lynam | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6123383 | Doerflinger et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6125585 | Koneval et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6128860 | Repp et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6141910 | Kobrehel et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6158173 | Goodrich | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6178697 | Goodrich | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6203639 | Swanson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6223470 | Millard et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6286261 | Hackstock | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6286890 | Faubert | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6286891 | Gage et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6293609 | Xu et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6298606 | Repp et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6319344 | Lewno | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6324727 | Ortoleva | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6324788 | Koneval et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6398396 | Nestell et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6434789 | Kruse | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6454449 | Nestell et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
| 6521083 | Swanson et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6547880 | Krueger et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6591552 | Rasmussen | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6599386 | Swanson et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6669267 | Lynam et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6688659 | Kobrehel | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6691464 | Nestell et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6748638 | Dedrich et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6819467 | Lynam | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6846039 | Lewno | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6871450 | Repp et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6926949 | Halg et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6969101 | Lynam et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 7003916 | Nestell et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7073293 | Galer | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7234756 | Lynam et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7332225 | Lewno | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7360338 | Repp et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7588652 | Repp et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7712809 | Lynam et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7838115 | Lewno | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 8048529 | Lewno | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8322073 | Lewno | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 20030070371 | Kobrehel | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030110703 | Kobrehel | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030213179 | Galer | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040020131 | Galer et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20050121942 | Repp et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050188622 | Nestell | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20060107600 | Nestell et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20080156415 | Repp et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080196816 | Lewno | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20090293368 | Repp et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20110056140 | Lewno | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 358158 | Feb 1928 | BE |
| 1902498 | Aug 1970 | DE |
| 2039313 | May 1971 | DE |
| 7520034 | Nov 1975 | DE |
| 2840811 | Apr 1980 | DE |
| 3044614 | Jul 1982 | DE |
| 3118559 | Nov 1982 | DE |
| 3246396 | Dec 1982 | DE |
| 3409903 | Oct 1984 | DE |
| 3404693 | Sep 1985 | DE |
| 3419893 | Nov 1985 | DE |
| 3501490 | Jul 1986 | DE |
| 3509531 | Dec 1986 | DE |
| 3624621 | Apr 1987 | DE |
| 3643472 | Dec 1987 | DE |
| 3727413 | Feb 1988 | DE |
| 3641363 | Jun 1988 | DE |
| 3832178 | Apr 1990 | DE |
| 3925804 | Aug 1990 | DE |
| 4002514 | Aug 1990 | DE |
| 4113816 | Nov 1991 | DE |
| 4129492 | Jan 1993 | DE |
| 0037097 | Mar 1981 | EP |
| 0037097 | Oct 1981 | EP |
| 0096128 | Dec 1983 | EP |
| 0096129 | Dec 1983 | EP |
| 0109659 | May 1984 | EP |
| 0128086 | Dec 1984 | EP |
| 0219903 | Apr 1987 | EP |
| 289156 | Nov 1988 | EP |
| 0298788 | Jan 1989 | EP |
| 0307316 | Mar 1989 | EP |
| 0345134 | Dec 1989 | EP |
| 0352151 | Jan 1990 | EP |
| 0368728 | May 1990 | EP |
| 0385924 | Sep 1990 | EP |
| 0400291 | Dec 1990 | EP |
| 0418123 | Mar 1991 | EP |
| 0449372 | Mar 1991 | EP |
| 0449372 | Oct 1991 | EP |
| 0488878 | Jun 1992 | EP |
| 0494824 | Jul 1992 | EP |
| 526327 | Feb 1993 | EP |
| 0542673 | May 1993 | EP |
| 0576179 | Dec 1993 | EP |
| 0576180 | Dec 1993 | EP |
| 650768 | May 1995 | EP |
| 0709660 | May 1931 | FR |
| 2552483 | Mar 1985 | FR |
| 1215267 | Dec 1970 | GB |
| 1235056 | Jun 1971 | GB |
| 1452812 | Oct 1976 | GB |
| 2001700 | Feb 1979 | GB |
| 1573354 | Aug 1980 | GB |
| 2048356 | Dec 1980 | GB |
| 2174746 | Nov 1986 | GB |
| 2215717 | Sep 1989 | GB |
| 47-11057 | Apr 1972 | JP |
| 46-95369 | Jun 1972 | JP |
| 47-36332 | Nov 1972 | JP |
| 49-47624 | May 1974 | JP |
| 58-47533 | Mar 1983 | JP |
| 61-266337 | Nov 1986 | JP |
| 62-278035 | Feb 1987 | JP |
| 63060131 | Mar 1988 | JP |
| 01219280 | Jan 1989 | JP |
| S64-45520 | Mar 1989 | JP |
| 1122722 | May 1989 | JP |
| 1219280 | Sep 1989 | JP |
| H2258844 | Oct 1990 | JP |
| 30-70626 | Mar 1991 | JP |
| H370626 | Mar 1991 | JP |
| 3236922 | Oct 1991 | JP |
| WO 9502621 | Jan 1995 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| A. Goel, New Hybrid Structural Adhesive for Reinforced Plastics, Composites Institute, SPI, Feb. 1987. |
| A. J. Kinloch, Adhesion and Adhesives, Science and Technology, Chapman and Hall,1987. |
| A. Pizzi and K. L. Mittal, Handbook of Adhesive Technology, Marcel Dekker Inc., 1994. |
| A. Pocius, Third Generation Two-Part Epoxy Adhesives, 19th Int'l SAMPLE Technical Conference, Oct. 1987. |
| Adhesives, D.A.T.A. Digest, 1991, 237 pages. |
| Anil B. Goel, New Hybrid Structural Adhesive for Reinforced Plastics, Feb. 2-6, 1987, 7 pages. |
| ASC, “The Evolution of Adhesives Used in Structural & Assembly Applications”, 1 page, dated Sep. 2008. |
| Ashland Chemicals Pliogrip 6036 Wash Primer, Technical Data, Nov. 1986. |
| Ashland Chemical's Pliogrip 6600 Urethane Adhesive, Technical Data, Jul. 1986. |
| Ashland Chemicals Pliogrip 6620, Technical Data, Oct. 1986. |
| Ashland Chemicals, Pliogrip Adhesive Systems for Structural Bonding, 1986, 16 pages. |
| Ashland Pliogrip Adhesive Systems, 8200 Primer, Infotech Product Literature, 2000. |
| Betaseal 43518 Clear Glass Primer Process Standard, Dow Automotive, Oct. 15, 1999. |
| BetaSeal 43520A Blackout Glass Primer Process Standard, Dow Automotive, Oct. 17, 2001. |
| Bonding and Coating Plastics in the Automotive Industry, EuroTrends, Nov. 1990. |
| Bonding with Epoxy Elastomeric Adhesives System, Glass to Metal Military Specification B-48612, Sep. 1, 1997. |
| Charles E. Rogers, “Durability of Structural Adhesives,” Adhesive Bonding Advance Technology/Update—1993, Oct. 19-21, 1993, Univ. of Wis. Ctr for Cont. Ed., (51 pages). |
| Chrysler Adhesive-Sealer Polyurethane Base-Room Temperature Moisture Curing Glass To Body Opening Applications, MS-CD910, Change A, Jul. 1972, 4 pages. |
| Chrysler Adhesive-Sealer-Polyurethane Base-Room Temperature Curing Windshield and Backlight Applications, MS-CD917, Change A, Jun. 1990, 10 pages. |
| Chrysler Bonding Of Windshield And Backlites To Body Opening With Adhesive/Sealer Polyurethane Base-Room Temperature Curing, PS-7103, Change E, Apr. 1993, 7 pages. |
| Chrysler Corporation Material Standard, Structural Adhesive—Steel to Tempered Glass, MSCD618<S> Change: D, May 8, 1997. |
| Chrysler Corporation Process Standard, Bonding of Steel Channel to Tempered Glass With a Structural Adhesive, No. PS-6764<S> Change: C, Jun. 3, 1997. |
| Chrysler Electrically Heated Backlight, PF-6071, Change C, Sep. 1981, 7 pages. |
| Chrysler Environmental, Health, and Occupational Safety Requirements For Regulated Substances Or Processes And Vehicle Recycling Reporting Requirements, CS-9003, Change B, Apr. 1993, 17 pages. |
| Chrysler Glass Assembly Using Urethane Adhesive, No. PF-, Apr. 1993, 7 pages. |
| Chrysler Glass-Safety-Heat Treated, MS-3694, Change T, Jun. 1990, 13 pages. |
| Chrysler Modular Window Air And Water Leak Test, PS-8461, Feb. 1987, 3 pages. |
| Chrysler Performance of Injection Molded TPU to Single Side of Fritted Tempered Glass, Apr. 1993, 3 pages. |
| Chrysler Primer-Adhesion Promoter-Polyurethane Adhesive To Glass, MS-CF121, Change A, Jul. 1972, 4 pages. |
| Chrysler Tolerance Control Of Window Glass Parts And Glass-And-Frame Assemblies, PS-4468, Change B, Sep. 1981, 13 pages. |
| D. Weyher, Adhesives Used in Automotive Production, 710106, SAE, Jan. 11, 1971. |
| “Designer's Reference Guide to High-Performance Bonding Tapes for Product Design and Assembly,” 3M—Industrial Specialties Division, St. Paul, Minnesota, 1991 (24 pages). |
| Double Coated Industrial Tapes Reference Guide, 3M Industrial Tape and Specialties Division, 70-0702-0266-1(104.5)R1, 1994. |
| Dupont Rynite Thermoplastic Polyester Resin Product Information, Apr. 1, 1989. |
| E. Plueddemann, Bonding to Metals, AD90-125, SAE, Nov. 1989. |
| E. Sydor, Bonding of Structural Adhesives, National Automotive Week Paper, SAE, Mar. 1961. |
| Exhibit A—Complaint and Jury Demand (Nov. 22, 2005). |
| Exhibit B—Guardian's Answer, Defenses, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims to Donnelly's Complaint and Jury Demand (May 18, 2006). |
| Exhibit C—Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant's Counterclaim (Jun. 9, 2006). |
| Exhibit D—First Amended Complaint (Feb. 23, 2007). |
| Exhibit E—Gaurdian's Answer, Defenses, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims to Donnelly's First Amended Complaint and Jury Demand (Apr. 2, 2007). |
| Exhibit F—Counter-Defendant's Reply to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Counterclaims (Apr. 19, 2007). |
| Exhibit G—Complaint and Jury Demand (Oct. 17, 2006). |
| Exhibit H—Defendant Pilkington North America, Inc.'s Answer, Affirmative Defenses, Counterclaims and Jury Demand (Dec. 28, 2006). |
| Exhibit I—Plaintiff's Reply to Counterclaim of Defendant Pilkington North America, Inc. (Jan. 17, 2007). |
| Exhibit J—Complaint and Jury Demand (Feb. 19, 2008). |
| Exhibit K—First Amended Complaint and Jury Demand (Apr. 22, 2008). |
| Exhibit L—Pilkington North America, Inc.'s Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaim to First Amended Complaint and Jury Demand (Jul. 29, 2008). |
| Exhibit M—Plaintiff's Answer to Counterclaim and Affirmative Defenses (Aug. 18, 2008). |
| Exhibit N—Complaint and Jury Demand (Feb. 19, 2008). |
| Exhibit O—Guardian's Answer, Defenses, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims to Donnelly's Complaint and Jury Demand (Jul. 30, 2008). |
| Exhibit P—Magna Donnelly's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Guardian's Counterclaims (Aug. 19, 2008). |
| Exhibit Q—Extract of document No. 78-28 filed by the defendant in the Guardian Litigation with the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Apr. 25, 2007. |
| Exhibit R—Pilkington's Prior Art Disclosure (Jan. 30, 2009). |
| G. MacIver, The State of Polyurethane Structural Adhesive Technology in the Transporation Industry, 910386, SAE, Feb. 25, 1991. |
| G. Sauer, Innovationen auf dem Glassektor, 1988, 7 pages. |
| G. Schneberger, Automotive Adhesives—Past,Present and Future, 800210,SAE, Feb. 25, 1980. |
| G. Schneberger, Automotive Adhesives—Why, How, What, Where, 780191, SAE, Feb. 27, 1978. |
| GM Adhesion and Durability Of Bonded Weaterstrip—Pressure Sensitive Adhesive, GM9795P, Mar. 1990, 3 pages. |
| GM Adhesion and Durability Of Exterior Trims, GM9758P, Nov. 1988, 3 pages. |
| GM Adhesive, Two-Part, Epoxy, FRP, 9985600, May 1994, 3 pages. |
| GM Adhesive, Two-Part, Epoxy, Hardener, 9985601, May 1994, 2 pages. |
| GM Adhesive, Two-Part, Epoxy, Resin, 9985602, May 1994, 1 page. |
| GM Adhesive, Two-Part, Polyurethane, Structural 9985786, Apr. 1992, 2 pages. |
| GM Adhesive, Two-Part, Polyurethane, Structural 9985787, Apr. 1992, 1 page. |
| GM Adhesive, Two-Part, Polyurethane, Structural 9985788, Apr. 1992, 2 pages. |
| GM Adhesive, Twopart, Urethane, FRP, 9985454, Jun. 1992, 3 pages. |
| GM Cleavage Peel Test, GM9797P, Nov. 1988, 3 pages. |
| GM Electrodeposition Primer—Cathodic ELPO For Small Parts, 9984120, 1993, 1 page. |
| GM Knife Quick Adhesion Test For Stationary Glass Bonding Materials To Paint, GM9522P, Jan. 1992, 1 page. |
| GM Molding and Emblem Adhesion Test Pluck Resistance, GM9774P, Jan. 1994, 4 pages. |
| GM Mounting Tape—Exterior Trim, GM3802M, Nov. 1993, 3 pages. |
| GM Performance of Substrates And/Or Coatings Through Environmental Cycling, GM9505P, Jul. 1988, 4 pages. |
| GM Stationary Glass Bonding Adhesive System Performance Requirements, GM3652M, Jun. 1992, 2 pages. |
| GM Zinc Coated Steel Sheet and Strip, Hot Dip Galvanized, GM6185M, Aug. 1993, 2 pages. |
| Gurit Essex AG Beta Seal Betamate document, Jun. 1988, 136 pages. |
| H. Kunert and G. Cornils, Advanced Concepts for Modular Glazings, 920201, SAE, Feb. 24, 1992. |
| Hackh, Ingo W.D., 1890-1938, Grant & Hackh's Chemical Dictionary, Rev. ed. Of Chemical Dictionary 4th edition, (1969). |
| Henderson, Steve, ASI, “Innovations in Glass Bonding: urethane glass bonding adhesives from Dow Automotive can be dispensed robotically using industry standard equipment. (Dow Automotive Material Div.)”, 2 pages, dated Mar. 1, 2005. |
| “How to Bond Plastics—The Better Way to Hold Parts Together,” Loctite Corporation, Newington, Connecticut, Nov. 1988 (8 pages). |
| “How to Bond Plastics,” Loctite Corporation, North America Group, Newington, Connecticut, Oct. 1992 (36 pages). |
| I. Houston, K. Dowing and K. Mack, General Motors—The Glue Line—Why How and When, SAE, Mar. 13, 1961. |
| I. Johns, Adhesion Fundamentals, Industrial Adhesives and Sealants Seminar, Australasia Technical Papers, Lecture No. 1, SAE, Dec. 1979. |
| J. Cocoo, L. Moffa, D. Callanan, The Role of Design for Manufacturing and Adhesives in Solving Design Challenges, 910504, SAE. Feb. 25, 1991. |
| J. Dunne, Inside Detroit—GM's 1990 FWD Minivan, Popular Mechanics, May 1987. |
| J. Shields, Adhesives Handbook, Third Edition, Butterworth & Co., 1985. |
| Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 4 pages, dated 1988. |
| K. Habeeb, The Present and Future Uses of Reactive Type Adhesive, 700071, SAE, Jan. 12, 1970. |
| K. Schroeder and K. Drain, New Developments in Structural Adhesives, AD90-127,SAE, Nov. 1989. |
| K.H. Bruck, Fahrzeug-Verglasung, 1990, 8 pages. |
| Kurt Devries, Analysis of Adhesive Tensile Test Methods, Polymer Engineering & Science, Jul. 1986, vol. 26, No. 13, pp. 962-968. |
| L. Kertesz, Hopeful: GM Tarrytown Workers Approve Part in Bid To Win Production of Minivan, Automotive News, Crain Communications, Inc. Jan. 19, 1987. |
| “Loctite Technology—A Catalog of Adhesive and Sealant Solutions,” Loctite Corporation Industrial Group, Newington, Connecticut, Sep. 1990 (62 pages). |
| M. Kimball, Reactive Hot Melt Adhesives for Automotive Bonding, AD90-126, SAE, Nov. 1989. |
| Mark Blitshteyn, “Surface Treatment of Plastics: Review of Surface Treatment Technologies,” University of Wisconsin, date unknown (38 pages). |
| Material Safety Data Sheet Betamate (R) 43518 Glass Primer, Essex Specialty Products, Inc., Aug. 2, 1993. |
| Material Safety Data Sheet for 435.18 adhesion promoter, dated Mar. 15, 2007, 11 pages. |
| Material Safety Data Sheet for 435.20 primer, dated Aug. 14, 1985, 2 pages. |
| Material Safety Data Sheet for 435.20A primer, dated Jan. 30, 2006, 12 pages. |
| Material Safety Data Sheet for 73002 polyol component, dated Jun. 24, 1994, 4 pages. |
| Material Safety Data Sheet for 73002 polyol component, dated Sep. 13, 2005, 8 pages. |
| Material Safety Data Sheet for 73003 polyol component, dated Mar. 24, 2004, 8 pages. |
| Material Safety Data Sheet for 73005 polyol component, dated Feb. 25, 2003, 7 pages. |
| Material Safety Data Sheet for 73005 polyol component, dated Jun. 7, 1996, 6 pages. |
| Material Safety Data Sheet for 73005 polyol component, dated Mar. 24, 2004, 8 pages. |
| Material Safety Data Sheet for 73010 polyol component, dated Mar. 23, 2004, 8 pages. |
| Material Safety Data Sheet for 73015 polyol component, dated Mar. 24, 2004, 8 pages. |
| Material Safety Data Sheet for 73100 isocyanate component, dated Sep. 13, 2005, 9 pages. |
| Photographs A-G of General Motors G300 Station wagon quarter window with hinged vent on sale or used by others more than one (1) year prior to Sep. 30, 1993. |
| Photographs of Chrysler AS minivan side window hinge on sale or used by others more than one (1) year prior to Sep. 30, 1993. |
| Photographs of side vent window allegedly from 1987 or 88 General Motors “CK” truck on sale or used by others more than one (1) year prior to Sep. 30, 1993. |
| Photographs of side vent window, origin unknown, allegedly on sale or used by others more than one (1) year prior to Sep. 30, 1993. |
| Photos provided by Pilkington allegedly showing a 1978 Corvette T-top; a 1990 GM 325 truck r/q swing-out; a 1990 F car T-top; and a 1991 GM 330 truck liftgate. |
| R. Agrawal, A. Agrawal and J. Thomas, Developments in Modular Windows For Automotive Applications, 910759,SAE, Feb. 25, 1991. |
| R. H. Beck and D.A. Yurek, Automotive Structural Bonding, 750077, SAE, Feb. 24, 1975. |
| R. Murray and L. Marlin, The Present and Future Status of Hot Melt Adhesives in the Automotive Industry, 700070, SAE, Jan. 12, 1970. |
| “Replacing Mechanical Fasteners for Advanced Product Assembly . . . Very-High-Bond Scott™ VHB™ Tapes,” 3M—Industrial Tape and Specialties Division, St. Paul, MN, 1993 (8 pages). |
| Robert D. Anderson, “PSA Technology and Applications Adhesive Bonding Advanced Technology—Update 1993” 3M—Industrial Tape and Specialties Division, 1993 (17 pages). |
| S.J. Monte et al., Application of Titanate Coupling Agents in Mineral and Glass Fiber Filled Rim Urethane Systems, Journal of Elastomers and Plastics (Feb. 1982). |
| S.J. Monte et al., The Use of Titanate Coupling Agents in Urethanes, Journal of Cellular Plastics, (Mar./Apr. 1983). |
| SAE Technical Paper 900519, Feb. 26, 1990. |
| SAE Technical Paper 910758, Feb. 25, 1991. |
| Scotch-Weld Adhesive 642/6 mil, AutomotiveTechnical Data Sheet, 3M Automotive Systems Division, Jun. 20, 1987. |
| Skeist Ph.D., Irving, Handbook of Adhesives, Consultant to the Polymer Industries, Skeist Inc., (1990). |
| Toyota One-Component Urethane Adhesives For Glass Sub-Assembly Parts, TSK5515G, Jun. 1991, 21 pages. |
| Toyota Polyvinyl Chloride Materials For Stainless Steel Molding, TSM7607G, Oct. 1990, 18 pages. |
| Toyota Technical Instruction Sheet No. 01 204-01033, Apr. 21, 1992, 11 pages. |
| Tyrite 7500 Urethane Adhesive System, DS10-3603B, Lord Industrial Adhesives Product Information, 1984. |
| Vista Suggested Processing Conditions for Vista Flexible PVC Compounds, 1992, 4 pages. |
| W.A. Pletcher, Bonding of Automotive Plastics—Technology and Applications, 810767, SAE, Jun. 8, 1981. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20130086844 A1 | Apr 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13178163 | Jul 2011 | US |
| Child | 13689799 | US | |
| Parent | 12946314 | Nov 2010 | US |
| Child | 13178163 | US | |
| Parent | 11969561 | Jan 2008 | US |
| Child | 12946314 | US | |
| Parent | 10847088 | May 2004 | US |
| Child | 11969561 | US | |
| Parent | 10054016 | Nov 2001 | US |
| Child | 10847088 | US | |
| Parent | 09520582 | Mar 2000 | US |
| Child | 10054016 | US | |
| Parent | 09213706 | Dec 1998 | US |
| Child | 09520582 | US | |
| Parent | 08924405 | Aug 1997 | US |
| Child | 09213706 | US | |
| Parent | 08420233 | Apr 1995 | US |
| Child | 08924405 | US |
