Claims
- 1. A velocity adaptive method for testing the control of dynamic devices of a system having a position schedule influenced by a dynamic factor, comprising the steps of:
- introducing a step into the position schedule and causing a disturbance in the system;
- maintaining said step for an interval of time;
- removing said step;
- calculating step response by the system while accounting for the dynamic factor; and
- comparing said step response to a threshold value for determining one of the failure and successful operation of the control.
- 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the dynamic factor is velocity of the devices, said step of calculating including determining a system response value indicative of a response of the system to said step as commanded by the control, determining a dynamic value for said velocity, and subtracting said dynamic value from said system response value.
- 3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the system is an aircraft engine having inlet guide vanes and an associated actuator, said step of introducing including causing a change in position of the inlet guide vanes for moving the engine off the position schedule.
- 4. The method according to claim 3, wherein the dynamic factor is velocity of the inlet guide vanes, said step of calculating including determining a response value indicative of a response of the control to said step, determining a dynamic value for said velocity, and subtracting said dynamic value from said response value.
- 5. The method according to claim 1, further comprising the steps of:
- repeating said steps of introducing, maintaining, removing, calculating, and comparing if the control is determined to have failed; and
- declaring a control failure if the control fails a given number of times.
- 6. The method according to claim 5, wherein in said step of declaring said given number of times is three.
- 7. The method according to claim 1, wherein in said step of comparing if said step response is less than said threshold value said control is in failure and wherein if said step response is greater than said threshold value said control is successfully operating.
- 8. The method according to claim 1, where in the system is an aircraft engine having inlet guide vanes and an associated actuator, said step of introducing including causing a change in position of the inlet guide vanes for moving the engine off the position schedule, wherein said step has a magnitude for moving said inlet guide vanes at least 1.degree. and said threshold value is equal to 1.degree..
- 9. The method according to claim 8, wherein if said step response is less than 1.degree. as determined in said step of calculating, said control is in failure.
Parent Case Info
This application is a Continuation-in-Part of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/955,006 filed Oct. 20, 1997.
US Referenced Citations (2)
Number |
Name |
Date |
Kind |
4158884 |
McKinley et al. |
Jun 1979 |
|
5423203 |
Namiki et al. |
Jun 1995 |
|
Continuation in Parts (1)
|
Number |
Date |
Country |
Parent |
955006 |
Oct 1997 |
|