Ait bubbles can interfere with the proper delivery of ink and other printing liquids to the dispensing nozzles in an inkjet printer. Air bubbles may enter the printing liquid delivery system from the outside, for example through dispensing nozzles and system connections, and by outgassing during large temperature and pressure changes. Inkjet printers, therefore, usually include some type of mechanism for removing air bubbles from the printing liquid delivery system.
The same part numbers designate the same or similar parts throughout the figures.
In some inkjet printers, a vent membrane that passes air but not liquid is used to help remove air bubbles from ink or other printing liquids. Lower pressure on the dry side of the membrane draws air bubbles in the printing liquid from the wet side of the membrane to the dry side where the air can be warehoused or released to the atmosphere. The membrane materials used in long lasting print bars that are replaced infrequently (or not at all) must maintain good air permeability for long periods exposed to printing liquids. Suitable membrane materials typically have lower air permeability and thus lower venting rates compared to more permeable materials that can lose much of their permeability too soon after exposure to printing liquids. While lower permeability materials can provide adequate venting during normal printing operations, they slow the process of filling a print bar at start-up when air or shipping fluid is replaced with printing liquid.
A multi-part vent has been developed to enable faster venting during start-up while still maintaining good air permeability for long periods exposed to the printing fluid. In one example, the vent includes two membranes arranged parallel to one another for simultaneous venting through both membranes. One membrane has a higher air permeability (lower resistivity) and the other membrane has a lower air permeability (higher resistivity). A dual membrane vent provides a cost-effective solution to achieve greater venting capacity for faster filling at start-up without compromising long term performance in the event the lower resistivity membrane material fails (to vent) soon after exposure to the printing liquid.
The examples shown in the figures and described herein illustrate but do not limit the scope of the claimed subject matter, which is defined in the Claims following this Description. Examples are not limited to printing with ink but also include inkjet type dispensing of other liquids and/or for uses other than printing.
Currently, the useful life of membrane materials suitable for use in venting air from ink in an inkjet printer varies depending on the resistivity of the material, which can change after exposure to ink. Testing indicates the performance of some membrane materials with initially lower air resistivity (higher air permeability) may degrade quickly after exposure to inks commonly used for inkjet printing while the performance of materials with initially higher air resistivity (lower air permeability) remains steady for long periods of ink exposure. Lower resistivity membrane materials often have a shorter useful life while higher resistivity materials have a longer useful life.
The graph of
Liquid delivery system 32 includes a supply 44 of printing liquid 34 and a flow regulator 46 to regulate the flow of liquid 34 from supply 44 to printhead 36. In the example shown, the flow of liquid 34 into regulator chamber 48 is controlled by a valve 50. An air bag 52 expands and contracts to close and open valve 50 through a linkage 54. Bag 52 is open to the atmosphere or connected to another suitable source of air pressure. A biasing spring 56 exerts a predetermined force on bag 52 to maintain the desired pressure in chamber 48, which is usually a slightly negative pressure (gage) to help prevent liquid drooling from printhead 36 when the printer is idle. A filter 58 is commonly used to remove impurities.
Air management system 38 includes vents 10 from liquid chamber 48 and an air pump 60 operatively connected to each vent 10. Pump 60 evacuates air from the dry side of each vent 10 to lower the pressure to allow air bubbles 40 in printing liquid 34 to pass through a vent membrane 62. Membrane 62 allows air bubbles 40 to pass to the dry side but blocks liquid 34, at least within the normal operating conditions for delivery system 32.
In the example shown, each vent 10 is connected to pump 60 through a vacuum reservoir 64 maintained at a desired range of lower pressures. As air bubbles 40 move through vents 10, the pressure in reservoir 64 will rise (i.e., the degree of vacuum declines) so that the vacuum must be periodically refreshed by opening a control valve 66 and running pump 60. Also in the example shown, two air vents 10 are used to remove air from liquid chamber 48. One vent 10 is upstream from filter 58 (in the direction of liquid flow through chamber 48) and another vent 10 is downstream from filter 58.
Suitable lower resistivity, higher air permeability vent materials include GORE® D10 SFO ePTFE with a characteristic pore dimension of approximately 2 microns and NITTO DENKO Temish® S-NTF2122A-S06, an ePTFE material with an oleophobic treatment on a non-woven PET carrier. Suitable higher resistivity, lower permeability venting materials include PALL® Infuzor brand membrane materials with a thinner (e.g., 1-2 micron) layer of non-porous PTFE over a thicker (e.g., 25 micron) layer of ePTFE. Other suitable vent materials are possible. For example, it is expected that some of the PTFE and other “breathable” fabrics currently available may be modified to provide the desired functional characteristics for each vent part 12, 14.
In one example for an inkjet printer such as printer 10 shown in
Other configurations/arrangements vent parts 12, 14 are possible. For one example, more than two vent parts may be used and/or with varying characteristics both for flow rate and longevity. For another example, other shapes for vent parts 12, 14 are possible including disks and rings.
“A” and “an” used in the claims means one or more.
The examples shown in the figures and described above illustrate but do not limit the scope of the patent, which is defined in the following Claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2015/012462 | 1/22/2015 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/118143 | 7/28/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5546109 | Nakano | Aug 1996 | A |
6338554 | Kitahara | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6457820 | Cai | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6520633 | Nakamura | Feb 2003 | B2 |
7238224 | Kent | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7584903 | Koerner et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7887160 | Silverbrook | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8277034 | Murray et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
20090122121 | Kawasaki et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20120274711 | Murray | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130233418 | Aldrich et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130300801 | Stephens et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140205815 | Hodgins et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101052458 | Oct 2007 | CN |
101654016 | Feb 2010 | CN |
101654016 | Feb 2010 | CN |
2003-049629 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003237102 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2010-058323 | Mar 2010 | JP |
WO-2006055490 | May 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bubble Removal From Ink Jet Inks and Coatings Using SuperPhobic Membrane Contractors. Feb. 16, 2005. www.liqui-cel.com. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170368835 A1 | Dec 2017 | US |