The present invention relates generally to printing. More particularly, example embodiments of the present invention relate to printing symbols on media.
Generally speaking, data patterns and indicia such as bar code patterns, data matrix patterns, OCR (Optical Character Recognition) fonts, text characters, graphic images, logos and other one dimensional (1D) and two dimensional (2D) patterns of geometric and graphic data, which may be referred to herein with the term “symbols,” are useful in a wide variety of applications. Some printers may be specialized for efficient printing of the data patterns.
Bar code printers may thus be widely deployed in various supply chain and identification applications. Printers for bar codes and other such symbols and indicia may use web printing techniques to apply markings related to writing, symbols, graphics, and other indicia onto a theretofore unmarked or pre-printed printable medium. The printable medium may thus comprise a web.
As used herein, the term “web” may refer to a strip of printable material that is significantly longer than it is wide. The web medium may be stored ready to use on a spool, magazine, fan-fold media, or other package or storage means. As printing is performed, the web medium is drawn from the storage means and fed longitudinally into the printer, where it is exposed to a printhead.
The printheads are operable for applying the markings controllably over at least one substantially planar surface of the printable web medium. The printheads may operate according to any mark application technology such as ink drop, matrix dot impact, toner, and any one of the various DPM (Direct Part Mark) printing technologies. The printheads of some bar code printers are operable thermally. The printable web medium used with such thermal printers comprises a heat sensitive material.
As the heat sensitive web medium is drawn into proximity with the thermal printhead, portions of its surface are marked controllably by selective heating therewith. The appearance of the surface portions may thus be darkened from a light shade (e.g., white or near-white) to print the markings. Alternately, the thermal printhead heats a thermally sensitive ribbon, which then transfers the heated image to a plain media substrate comprising the web. The printed web medium then emerges from the printer as a finished printing product.
Bar codes and other symbols may be printed and used as labels. The labels may comprise portions of the web medium, which may be separated therefrom as independent segments. A number of factors can affect the quality of the printing and thus the accuracy with which the markings are applied to the medium. Accurate printing allows labels to convey information correctly.
On the other hand, inaccurate printing may reduce the legibility of a label and cause errors in reading the information the label is intended to convey or provide graphics that are not aesthetically pleasing. The accuracy of the printing and the legibility of the label in relation to the information it is intended to present may be verified. For example, bar codes and OCR printed to particular specifications may be tested for compliance.
Verifying labels upon their emergence from the printers however adds cost, latency and complexity and occurs after the labels have already been printed, which can be wasteful. In-printer compliance testing techniques have thus been developed, with which verification of the labels is performed prior to their emergence from the printer.
In-printer compliance testing techniques may comprise capturing images of the nascent labels within the printer and during the print process. The captured images are evaluated for verification of the labels. In addition to capturing the verification images of each label, the in-printer verification may collect corresponding useful compliance testing statistics for every label printed.
In-printer compliance testing techniques may use the motion of the web medium to trigger the imaging of labels for verification and concomitant print quality correction in real-time. For example, the label may be imaged, digitized and sampled over at least part of the symbol, writing or graphic (hereinafter, “symbol”) presented by the label or other product.
The imaged symbol portion is compared to a print command and related update data thus generated, with which print logic may be updated in real time to control the quality of the printing and thus the accuracy of the label. The verification imaging and the real time quality adjustments are responsive to the motion of the web medium. However, the motion may not be consistently linear.
In fact, the motion of the web medium may tend to be non-linear in some respects. For example, thermal printers may slow down as the end of the label approaches and in some other situations. The verification images made under these circumstances may become distorted, the real time print quality adjustment unreliable and thus, the in-printer label verification may be inaccurate.
Therefore, a need exists for accurate compliance testing of symbols printed on media prior to the production of printed items, which emerge from the printer. A need also exists for the capturing verification images of symbols, which uses the motion of web media upon which the symbols are printed. Further, a need exists for considering non-linearity in the motion of the web media in the capture of the verification images of the printed symbols and compensating for such non-linear movement.
Accordingly, in one aspect, an example embodiment of the present invention embraces a printing method, which provides accurate compliance testing of symbols printed on media prior to the production of printed items. Example embodiments allow the capture of verification images of symbols and parts thereof, which uses the motion of web media upon which the symbols are printed. Further, example embodiments consider non-linearity in the motion of the web media in the capture of the verification images of the printed symbols and compensate for such non-linear movement.
In an example embodiment, the method for printing a symbol on a medium comprises marking a plurality of sequential parts of the symbol onto each of a corresponding plurality of sequential segments of the medium. A characteristic of each of the sequential symbol parts is evaluated. A speed is monitored with which the medium is moved upon the marking of each of the sequential symbol parts onto each of the corresponding sequential segments of the medium. An image captured in relation to the evaluation is adjusted based on the monitored speed.
In an example embodiment, the adjusting of the captured image comprises setting a rate at which the evaluating of the characteristic of each of the sequential symbol parts is performed based on the monitored speed.
In another example embodiment, the adjusting the captured image comprises predicting a distortion in the evaluated characteristic of each of the sequential symbol parts corresponding to the speed monitored upon the marking thereof. A change is applied to the captured image corresponding to the predicted distortion, in which the change applied ameliorates the predicted distortion.
The monitoring of the speed with which the medium is moved may comprise sensing a rate with which a motive force is imparted to the medium. The motive force may be imparted to the medium with a rotational and/or stepwise drive action. The monitoring of the speed with which the medium is moved may thus comprise sensing a rotation rate or a stepping rate of the drive action. Alternately, the speed may be ascertained by measuring the rotational rate of a roller that may be in contact with the media or by sensing marks that may be pre-printed on the media.
The printing method may also comprise generating data relating to the monitored speed. The adjusting of the captured image step may thus be performed in response to the data generated in relation to the monitored speed.
In another aspect, example embodiments of the present invention embrace a system operable for printing a symbol on a medium. In an example embodiment, the printing system comprises a marker operable for marking a plurality of sequential parts of the symbol onto each of a corresponding plurality of sequential segments of the medium. A scanner is operable for evaluating a characteristic of each of the sequential symbol parts.
A first controller is operable for monitoring a speed with which the medium is moved upon the marking of each of the sequential symbol parts onto each of the corresponding sequential segments of the medium. Based on the monitored speed, the controller is also operable for adjusting an image captured in relation to the evaluation of the characteristic of each of the sequential symbol parts based on the monitored speed.
The adjusting of the captured image may comprise setting a rate at which the evaluating of the characteristic of each of the sequential symbol parts is performed based on the monitored speed. The adjusting of the captured image may also (e.g., alternatively) comprise predicting a distortion in the evaluated characteristic of each of the sequential symbol parts corresponding to the speed monitored upon the marking thereof, and applying a change to the captured image corresponding to the predicted distortion. The change applied is operable for ameliorating the predicted distortion.
In an example embodiment, the monitoring of the speed with which the medium is moved may comprise sensing a rate with which a motive force is imparted to the medium. The motive force is imparted to the medium with a rotational and/or a stepwise drive action. The monitoring of the speed with which the medium is moved may thus comprise sensing a rate corresponding to the rotational and/or stepwise drive action.
The printing system may comprise at least a second controller, which is operable for controlling the rate with which a motive force is imparted to the medium. The system may also comprise a data link operable for communicatively coupling data from the at least second controller to the first controller. The data relates to the rate sensed at which the motive force is imparted to the medium.
The at least second controller sends the data relating to the rate sensed at which the motive force is imparted directly, via the data link, to the first controller. The first controller is operable in response to receiving the data for setting a rate at which the evaluating of the characteristic of each of the sequential symbol parts is performed.
The printing system may also comprise a recorder associated with the second controller. The recorder is operable with the second controller for recording the rate sensed at which the motive force is imparted to the medium.
The recorded rate may correspond to the data relating to the rate sensed at which the motive force is imparted to the medium. The recorder is further operable for sending the data corresponding to the recorded rate to the first controller.
The printing system may also comprise an image processor associated with the first controller and operable therewith in response to receiving the data. In response to receiving the data, the image processor predicts a distortion in the evaluated characteristic of each of the sequential symbol parts corresponding to the speed monitored upon the marking thereof. The image processor applies a change to the captured image corresponding to the distortion anticipated by the prediction. The change applied to the captured image ameliorates the predicted distortion therein.
In yet another aspect, example embodiments of the present invention embrace media products. An example embodiment relates to a media product comprising a symbol, such as a 1D bar code pattern or 2D data matrix pattern, which is printed on a medium by a printing process, as summarized in relation to the example method summarized above. Another example embodiment of the present invention relates to a non-transitory computer readable medium comprising instructions, which upon execution by a processor device are operable for controlling a printing system, or a computerized printer apparatus, to perform a process for printing a symbol on a medium, as summarized in relation to the example method summarized above.
In yet another aspect again, example embodiments of the present invention embrace non-transitory computer readable storage media. An example embodiment relates to a non-transitory computer readable storage media, which comprises instructions tangibly (physically, electronically, optically, magnetically, etc.) stored in one or more components thereof such as memory cells, optical, “flash” based, or magnetic storage media. The instructions are operable for causing, or controlling a computer processor to perform a printing process, such as the example printing process summarized above.
The foregoing illustrative summary, as well as other example features, functions and/or aspects of embodiments of the invention, and the manner in which the same are accomplished, are further explained within the following detailed description of example embodiments and each figure (FIG.) of the accompanying drawings.
Example embodiments of the present invention are described in relation to printing symbols on media. Sequential parts of a symbol are marked onto each of multiple corresponding sequential segments of the medium. A characteristic of each of the sequential symbol parts is evaluated. A speed is monitored with which the medium is moved upon the marking of each of the sequential symbol parts onto each of the corresponding sequential segments of the medium. An image captured in relation to the evaluation is adjusted based on the monitored speed.
The adjusting of the captured image may comprise setting a rate at which the evaluation of the characteristic of each of the sequential symbol parts is performed based on the monitored speed. Alternatively, the adjusting of the captured image may comprise predicting a distortion in the evaluated characteristic of each of the sequential symbol parts corresponding to the monitored speed. A change corresponding to the predicted distortion is then applied to the captured image. The change applied to the captured image is ameliorative of the distortion predicted therein.
Overview
Example embodiments of the present invention relate to printing symbols on media. In an example embodiment, a method for printing a symbol on a medium comprises marking a plurality of sequential parts of the symbol onto each of a corresponding plurality of sequential segments of the medium. Characteristics of each of the sequential symbol parts are evaluated. A speed is monitored with which the medium is moved upon the marking of each of the sequential symbol parts onto each of the corresponding sequential segments of the medium. An image captured in relation to the evaluating is adjusted based on the monitored speed.
The adjustment of the captured image comprises setting a rate at which the evaluating of the characteristic of each of the sequential symbol parts is performed based on the monitored speed.
Alternatively, the adjusting the captured image comprises predicting a distortion in the evaluated characteristic of each of the sequential symbol parts corresponding to the speed monitored upon the marking thereof. A change is applied to the captured image corresponding to the predicted distortion, in which the change applied ameliorates the predicted distortion.
Example embodiments also relate to a printing system, printed media products, and to non-transitory computer readable media.
Example embodiments of the present invention thus relate to a printing process, which provides accurate compliance testing of symbols printed on media prior to the production of printed items, which emerge from the printer. Example embodiments allow the capture of verification images of symbols, which uses the motion of web media upon which the symbols are printed. Further, example embodiments consider non-linearity in the motion of the web media in the capture of the verification images of the printed symbols and compensate for such non-linear movement.
Example Printers
In-printer compliance testing techniques may comprise capturing images of the nascent labels. The captured images are evaluated for verification of the labels. In addition to capturing the verification images of each label, the in-printer verification may collect corresponding useful compliance testing statistics for every label printed. The in-printer compliance testing techniques may use the motion of the web medium to trigger the imaging of labels for verification and concomitant print quality correction in real-time. For example, the label may be imaged, digitized and sampled over at least part of the symbol, writing or graphic (symbol) presented by the label.
For example, the U.S. Pat. No. 6,042,279 to H. Sprague Ackley (“Ackley,” one of the present Applicants) describes printing with real-time print quality correction, such as in 1D or 2D bar code printing, which is assigned to the common Assignee of the present application. A feedback mechanism has an imaging head for imaging, digitizing, or sampling at least a portion of a symbol, a comparator for comparing the imaged portion to a print command provided by a print logic print driver so as to generate print logic update information, wherein the print logic is updated in real time in response to the print logic update information.
The printing method and apparatus thus described may relate to a printing method, a printer system and/or other aspects or embodiments of an embodiment of the present invention. The U.S. Pat. No. 6,042,279 to Ackley is incorporated by reference for all purposes, as if fully set forth herein. Example printers may include PM43, PM23, PD43, PD42, PX4i, PM4i, PC43, PC23 model printers and/or models from the PX-series, PF-series, PM-series, PD-series and/or PC-series of printer of printers (which are available commercially from Honeywell™ International, Inc., a corporation in New Jersey).
As described in the referenced U.S. Pat. No. 6,042,279 to Ackley, the imaged symbol portion is compared to a print command and related update data thus generated, with which print logic may be updated in real time to control the quality of the printing and thus the accuracy of the label. The verification imaging and the real time quality adjustments are responsive to the motion of the web medium. However, the motion may not be consistently linear.
The motion of the web media on which symbols are being printed may be non-linear in some respects. For example, thermal printers may tend to slow down as the end of the label approaches the end of a print process (and in some other situations). The images made under these circumstances may become distorted and the real time print quality adjustment unreliable and thus, and inadequate for use.
The motor ramps up to an operational speed during an early portion 14 of the print event duration 11 until a speed plateau 15 is reached. The actual marking corresponding to the printing of a symbol (or portions thereof) upon the medium may commence upon reaching the plateau speed 15.
Later, e.g., towards an end portion 16 of the print event duration 11, the motor speed ramps down to a halt as the printing event is completed. Scanning relating to evaluating images captured to verify label compliance however may continue, at least in part, during the ramp down period 16. As the speed of the medium changes however, distortions such as printed element elongation, related to the speed change, may occur in the verification images captured during the ramp down period 16. Accordingly, in one aspect, an example embodiment of the present invention embraces a method for printing a symbol on a medium, which minimizes or eliminates such distortion. More complicated ramping profiles may occur e.g., when printing a batch of labels. Thus, the graph 10 represents label printing scenarios generally.
Example Process
In step 21, a plurality of sequential parts of the symbol onto each of a corresponding plurality of sequential segments of the medium.
In step 22, a characteristic of each of the sequential symbol parts is evaluated. For example, the scanner may capture and evaluate gray-level information (e.g. contrast) from the printed symbol.
In step 23, a speed is monitored with which the medium is moved upon the marking of each of the sequential symbol parts onto each of the corresponding sequential segments of the medium.
In step 24, an image captured in relation to the evaluating step is adjusted based on the monitored speed. In an example embodiment, the evaluating step may be adjusted based on a feedback data signal relating to the monitored speed.
In a step 240, the adjusting of the captured image step comprises setting a rate at which the evaluating of the characteristic of each of the sequential symbol parts is performed based on the monitored speed.
In another example embodiment, the adjusting the captured image step comprises predicting a distortion in the evaluated characteristic of each of the sequential symbol parts corresponding to the speed monitored upon the marking thereof.
In a step 241, a distortion is predicted in the evaluated characteristic of each of the sequential symbol parts. The prediction of the distortion corresponds to the speed monitored upon the marking thereof.
In step 242, a change is applied to the captured image corresponding to the predicted distortion, in which the change applied ameliorates the predicted distortion.
The monitoring of the speed with which the medium is moved may comprise sensing a rate with which a motive force is imparted to the medium. The motive force may be imparted to the medium with a rotational and/or stepwise drive action. The monitoring of the speed with which the medium is moved may thus comprise sensing a rotation rate or a stepping rate of the drive action.
The printing method may also comprise generating data relating to the monitored speed. Referring again to
Example Printer System
In another aspect, an example embodiment of the present invention embraces a system operable for printing a symbol on a medium.
In an example embodiment, the system 500 comprises a marker 509, such as a thermal printhead. Driven and/or controlled with a print driver 510, the marker 509 is operable for marking a plurality of (e.g., multiple) sequential parts of the symbol onto each of a corresponding plurality of sequential segments of a printable medium (“printed media”) 501. The printed media 501 may comprise a web of thermally sensitive material such as heat-sensitive paper or plastic. A scanner 505 is operable for evaluating a characteristic of each of the sequential symbol parts.
A first controller 506 is operable for monitoring a speed with which the medium 501 is moved upon the marking of each of the sequential symbol parts onto each of the corresponding sequential segments of the medium 501.
Based on the monitored speed, the first controller 506 is also operable for adjusting an image captured in relation to the evaluating the characteristic of each of the sequential symbol parts based on the monitored speed.
In an example embodiment, the adjusting of the captured image comprises setting a rate at which the evaluating of the characteristic of each of the sequential symbol parts is performed based directly on the monitored speed.
The adjusting of the captured image may also comprise predicting a distortion in the evaluated characteristic of each of the sequential symbol parts corresponding to the speed monitored upon the marking thereof. Applying a change to the captured image may thus correspond to the predicted distortion. The change applied is operable for ameliorating the predicted distortion.
In an example embodiment, the monitoring of the speed with which the medium 501 is moved may comprise sensing a rate with which a motive force is imparted to the medium 501. The motive force is imparted to the medium 501 with a rotational and/or a stepwise drive action, such as from a platen roller driven by a stepper motor 502. The monitoring of the speed with which the medium is moved may thus comprise sensing a rate corresponding to the rotational and/or stepwise drive action.
The printing system 500 may comprise multiple control functionalities, which may be implemented in hardware, software, and/or firmware. For example, the printing system 500 comprises at least a second controller 504 operable for controlling the rate with which a motive force is imparted to the medium.
The printing system 500 may also comprise a data link 503 operable for communicatively coupling data from the at least second controller 504 to the first controller 505. The data relates to the rate sensed at which the motive force is imparted to the medium 501.
The at least second controller 504 may send the data relating to the rate sensed at which the motive force is imparted directly, via the data link 503, to the first controller 506. The first controller 506 is operable in response to receiving the data for setting a rate at which the scanner 505 evaluates the characteristic of each of the sequential symbol parts.
The printing system 500 may also comprise a recorder 507 associated with the at least second controller 504. The recorder 507 is operable with the at least second controller 504 for recording the rate sensed at which the motive force is imparted to the medium 501.
The recorded rate may correspond to the data relating to the rate sensed at which the motive force is imparted to the medium. The recorder 507 is further operable for sending the data corresponding to the recorded rate to the first controller 506.
The printing system 500 may also comprise an image processor 508 associated with the first controller 506 and operable therewith in response to receiving the data. In response to receiving the data, the image processor 508 predicts a distortion in the evaluated characteristic of each of the sequential symbol parts corresponding to the speed monitored upon the marking thereof. For example, the distortion may relate to a relative number if image pixels used for each row of data acquired.
The image processor 508 applies a change to the captured image corresponding to the predicted distortion. The change applied to the captured image ameliorates the predicted distortion therein.
The image processor 508 may comprise microprocessor. One or more of the image processor 508, recorder 507, controllers 506 and/or 504, and/or print driver 510 may comprise an integrated circuit (IC) device such as a programmed microprocessor, or another programmed or configured IC device such as a programmable logic device (PLD), a microcontroller, field programmable gate array (FPGA), or application-specific IC (ASIC). One or more components of the printing system 500 may comprise processing and memory functionalities, which may be implemented with electronic hardware, software, and/or firmware.
The printer system 50 may be operable for performing the example printing processes 20, 30, and 40, as described above with reference to
An example embodiment of the present invention relates to media product. The media product comprises a symbol, such as a 1D bar code pattern or 2D data matrix pattern. The media product is printed on a medium by a printing process, such as the example printing processes 20, 30, and 40, as described above with reference to
The bar code symbols 610 and 620 each comprise a plurality of bar elements 66a and a plurality of space elements 68b. The space elements 68b are disposed in parallel with the bar elements 66a. In the drag mode, the bar code symbol 610 is printed parallel to the direction of printing 699. In the picket fence mode, the bar code symbol 620 is printed in a perpendicular orientation to the direction of printing 699.
The bar code symbols 610 and 620 may each comprise data patterns related to, for example, an International (or “European”) Article Number and/or Universal Product Code (EAN/UPC symbology) pattern, PDF417 (ISO/EC-15438 related) pattern, which comprise four of the vertical bar like symbols 66a disposed over 17 of the horizontally disposed spacer symbols 68b), 1D dot code pattern, or other 1D symbols.
The print media 611, 622, 644 and 655 each move longitudinally in a direction 699 of respective printing operations. The print media 611, 622, 644, and 655 may each comprise a thermally sensitive paper or plastic material disposed in a web configuration, which is significantly longer than it is wide. The direction of printing 699 is parallel to a longitudinal axis of the print media 611, 622, 644, and 655, along which the media move.
The symbols 610, 620, 640 and 650 may be printed on the respective web media 611, 622, 644 and 655 according to the example process 20 (
Responsive to the print command, the activated and energized printhead prints a part of the bar code 610, 620, and/or 650 and the media 611, 622, and/or 655, respectively, advance in the direction 699. Each time that the media is advanced, the print driver activates print elements of the printhead for printing of subsequent bar elements 66a, and spacing of parallel space elements 66b, onto a segment (e.g., portion) of the medium 699.
As the printed elements advance past the printhead, the scanner (e.g., scanner 55;
The image processor (e.g., image processor 58;
The digitized image may, additionally or alternatively, be compared to one or more other defined standards. Based on the results of the comparison, the print logic updates print information and determines whether the printed symbol parts differ from the desired image.
For example, the image parts may display distortion such as elongation or smearing. The elongation and/or smearing may be detected, and an extent of the distortion determined. The print logic update information may comprise, e.g., an updated pointer to a table of fonts or other programmed print features, with which a new print command may be generated.
A print quality report may be generated based on the comparison. The print quality report may indicate whether or not the printed image complies with a defined specification, stored in relation to evaluating the symbol and portions thereof. The print quality report, may indicate the manner in which the printed image differs from the desired image, and the steps taken by the printer to correct the deviation.
The bar elements of the machine readable data code symbol parts may comprise an array of closely proximate dots or other pixels (picture elements). As the medium 610 advances past the printhead, the scanner may digitize the pixels or other elements or features of the bar code symbols 610, 620, and/or 650. Successive portions of the elements may be imaged and stored in a memory area for comparison with the print command.
With the drag mode or the picket fence mode of printing, the digitized portion of the printed image comprises a portion of a plurality of the symbolic characters 66a and 68b. Scanning and/or concomitant sampling may be performed over a portion of the bar code characters 66a and 68b and compared with the print command. The print logic, as well as the print command and the print driver, may update before printing is complete over the entire bar code symbol 610.
Example embodiments of the present invention relate to printing the symbols on the media. In an example embodiment, a method for printing symbols on media comprises marking a plurality of sequential parts of a symbol onto each of a corresponding plurality of sequential segments of a medium. Characteristics of each of the sequential symbol parts are evaluated. A speed is monitored with which the medium is moved upon the marking of each of the sequential symbol parts onto each of the corresponding sequential segments of the medium. An image captured in relation to the evaluating step is adjusted based on the monitored speed.
The adjusting of the captured image step may comprise setting a rate at which the evaluating of the characteristic of each of the sequential symbol parts is performed based on the monitored speed. Alternatively, the adjusting the captured image step may comprise predicting a distortion in the evaluated characteristic of each of the sequential symbol parts corresponding to the speed monitored upon the marking thereof. A change is applied to the captured image corresponding to the predicted distortion, in which the change applied ameliorates the predicted distortion. Example embodiments also relate to printing systems, printed media products, and non-transitory computer readable media.
To supplement the present disclosure, this application incorporates entirely by reference the following commonly assigned patents, patent application publications, and patent applications:
Example embodiments of the present invention are thus described in relation to the printing of symbols on media. Sequential parts of a symbol are marked onto each of multiple corresponding sequential segments of the medium. Characteristics of each of the sequential symbol parts are evaluated. A speed is monitored with which the medium is moved upon the marking of each of the sequential symbol parts onto each of the corresponding sequential segments of the medium. An image captured in relation to the evaluation is adjusted based on the monitored speed. Adjusting of the captured image may comprise setting a rate at which the evaluation of the characteristic of each of the sequential symbol parts is performed based on the monitored speed. Alternatively, the adjusting of the captured image may comprise predicting a distortion in the evaluated characteristic of each of the sequential symbol parts corresponding to the monitored speed, and a change applied to the captured image corresponding to the predicted distortion. The change applied to the captured image is ameliorative of the distortion predicted therein.
For clarity and brevity, as well as to avoid unnecessary or unhelpful obfuscating, obscuring, obstructing, or occluding features of an example embodiment, certain intricacies and details, which are known generally to artisans of ordinary skill in related technologies, may have been omitted or discussed in less than exhaustive detail. Any such omissions or discussions are unnecessary for describing example embodiments of the invention, and not particularly relevant to understanding of significant features, functions and aspects of the example embodiments described herein.
In the specification and/or figures, typical embodiments of the invention have been disclosed. The present invention is not limited to such example embodiments. The use of the term “and/or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed items. The figures are schematic representations and so are not necessarily drawn to scale. Unless otherwise noted, specific terms have been used in a generic and descriptive sense and not for purposes of limitation.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4587411 | Obstfelder | May 1986 | A |
5272322 | Nishida | Dec 1993 | A |
5450116 | Weiselfish | Sep 1995 | A |
5820280 | Fox | Oct 1998 | A |
6002844 | Kishida | Dec 1999 | A |
6042279 | Ackley | Mar 2000 | A |
6135354 | Kubon | Oct 2000 | A |
6535299 | Scherz | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6832725 | Gardiner et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
7128266 | Marlton et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7159783 | Walczyk et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7413127 | Ehrhart et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7726575 | Wang et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8294969 | Plesko | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8317105 | Kotlarsky et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8322622 | Suzhou et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8366005 | Kotlarsky et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8371507 | Haggerty et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8376233 | Van Horn et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8381979 | Franz | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8390909 | Plesko | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8408464 | Zhu et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8408468 | Horn et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8408469 | Good | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8424768 | Rueblinger et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8448863 | Xian et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8457013 | Essinger et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8459557 | Havens et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8469272 | Kearney | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8474712 | Kearney et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8479992 | Kotlarsky et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8490877 | Kearney | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8517271 | Kotlarsky et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8523076 | Good | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8528818 | Ehrhart et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8544737 | Gomez et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8548420 | Grunow et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8550335 | Samek et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8550354 | Gannon et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8550357 | Kearney | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8556174 | Kosecki et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8556176 | Van Horn et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8556177 | Hussey et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8559767 | Barber et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8561895 | Gomez et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8561903 | Sauerwein | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8561905 | Edmonds et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8565107 | Pease et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8571307 | Li et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8579200 | Samek et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8583924 | Caballero et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8584945 | Wang et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8587595 | Wang | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8587697 | Hussey et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8588869 | Sauerwein et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8590789 | Nahill et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8596539 | Havens et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8596542 | Havens et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8596543 | Havens et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8599271 | Havens et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8599957 | Peake et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8600158 | Li et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8600167 | Showering | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8602309 | Longacre et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8608053 | Meier et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8608071 | Liu et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8611309 | Wang et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8615487 | Gomez et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8621123 | Caballero | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8622303 | Meier et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8628013 | Ding | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8628015 | Wang et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8628016 | Winegar | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8629926 | Wang | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8630491 | Longacre et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8635309 | Berthiaume et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8636200 | Kearney | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8636212 | Nahill et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8636215 | Ding et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8636224 | Wang | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8638806 | Wang et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8640958 | Lu et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8640960 | Wang et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8643717 | Li et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8646692 | Meier et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8646694 | Wang et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8657200 | Ren et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8659397 | Vargo et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8668149 | Good | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8678285 | Kearney | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8678286 | Smith et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8682077 | Longacre | Mar 2014 | B1 |
D702237 | Oberpriller et al. | Apr 2014 | S |
8687282 | Feng et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8692927 | Pease et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8695880 | Bremer et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8698949 | Grunow et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8702000 | Barber et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8717494 | Gannon | May 2014 | B2 |
8720783 | Biss et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8723804 | Fletcher et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8723904 | Marty et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8727223 | Wang | May 2014 | B2 |
8740082 | Wilz | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8740085 | Furlong et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8746563 | Hennick et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8750445 | Peake et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8752766 | Xian et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8756059 | Braho et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8757495 | Qu et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8760563 | Koziol et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8736909 | Reed et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8777108 | Coyle | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8777109 | Oberpriller et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8779898 | Havens et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8781520 | Payne et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8783573 | Havens et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8789757 | Baden | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8789758 | Hawley et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8789759 | Xian et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8794520 | Wang et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8794522 | Ehrhart | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8794525 | Amundsen et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8794526 | Wang et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8798367 | Ellis | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8807431 | Wang et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8807432 | Van Horn et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8820630 | Qu et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8822848 | Meagher | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8824692 | Sheerin et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8824696 | Braho | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8842849 | Wahl et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8844822 | Kotlarsky et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8844823 | Fritz et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8849019 | Li et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
D716285 | Chaney et al. | Oct 2014 | S |
8851383 | Yeakley et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8854633 | Laffargue | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8866963 | Grunow et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8868421 | Braho et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8868519 | Maloy et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8868802 | Barten | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8868803 | Bremer et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8870074 | Gannon | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8879639 | Sauerwein | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8880426 | Smith | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8881983 | Havens et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8881987 | Wang | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8903172 | Smith | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8908995 | Benos et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8910870 | Li et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8910875 | Ren et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8914290 | Hendrickson et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8914788 | Pettinelli et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8915439 | Feng et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8915444 | Havens et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8916789 | Woodburn | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8918250 | Hollifield | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8918564 | Caballero | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8925818 | Kosecki et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8939374 | Jovanovski et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8942480 | Ellis | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8944313 | Williams et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8944327 | Meier et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8944332 | Harding et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8950678 | Germaine et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
D723560 | Zhou et al. | Mar 2015 | S |
8967468 | Gomez et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8971346 | Sevier | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8976030 | Cunningham et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8976368 | Akel et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8978981 | Guan | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8978983 | Bremer et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8978984 | Hennick et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8985456 | Zhu et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8985457 | Soule et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8985459 | Kearney et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8985461 | Gelay et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8988578 | Showering | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8988590 | Gillet et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8991704 | Hopper et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8996194 | Davis et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8996384 | Funyak et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8998091 | Edmonds et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9002641 | Showering | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9007368 | Laffargue et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9010641 | Qu et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9015513 | Murawski et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9016576 | Brady et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
D730357 | Fitch et al. | May 2015 | S |
9022288 | Nahill et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9030964 | Essinger et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9033240 | Smith et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9033242 | Gillet et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9036054 | Koziol et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9037344 | Chamberlin | May 2015 | B2 |
9038911 | Xian et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9038915 | Smith | May 2015 | B2 |
D730901 | Oberpriller et al. | Jun 2015 | S |
D730902 | Fitch et al. | Jun 2015 | S |
D733112 | Chaney et al. | Jun 2015 | S |
9047098 | Barten | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9047359 | Caballero et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9047420 | Caballero | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9047525 | Barber | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9047531 | Showering et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9049640 | Wang et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9053055 | Caballero | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9053378 | Hou et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9053380 | Xian et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9057641 | Amundsen et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9058526 | Powilleit | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9064165 | Havens et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9064167 | Xian et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9064168 | Todeschini et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9064254 | Todeschini et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9066032 | Wang | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9070032 | Corcoran | Jun 2015 | B2 |
D734339 | Zhou et al. | Jul 2015 | S |
D734751 | Oberpriller et al. | Jul 2015 | S |
9082023 | Feng et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
20020180475 | Watanabe | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030067616 | Toyoda | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040033098 | Chiu | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20070063048 | Havens et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20090058348 | Ryu | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090134221 | Zhu et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090189935 | Kunimatsu | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100177076 | Essinger et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100177080 | Essinger et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100177707 | Essinger et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100177749 | Essinger et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110038652 | Kobayashi | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110044724 | Funamoto | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110102850 | Watanabe | May 2011 | A1 |
20110149005 | Wolanski | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110169999 | Grunow et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110202554 | Powilleit et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120111946 | Golant | May 2012 | A1 |
20120168512 | Kotlarsky et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120193423 | Samek | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120203647 | Smith | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120223141 | Good et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130043312 | Van Horn | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130057878 | Hopper | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130075168 | Amundsen et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130175341 | Kearney et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130175343 | Good | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130257744 | Daghigh et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130257759 | Daghigh | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130270346 | Xian et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130287258 | Kearney | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130292475 | Kotlarsky et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130292477 | Hennick et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130293539 | Hunt et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130293540 | Laffargue et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130306728 | Thuries et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130306731 | Pedraro | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130307964 | Bremer et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130308625 | Corcoran | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130313324 | Koziol et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130313325 | Wilz et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130342717 | Havens et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140001267 | Giordano et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140002828 | Laffargue et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140008439 | Wang | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140025584 | Liu et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140034734 | Sauerwein | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140036848 | Pease et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140039693 | Havens et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140042814 | Kather et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140049120 | Kohtz et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140049635 | Laffargue et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140061306 | Wu et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140063289 | Hussey et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140066136 | Sauerwein et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140067692 | Ye et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140070005 | Nahill et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140071840 | Venancio | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140074746 | Wang | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140076974 | Havens et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140078341 | Havens et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140078342 | Li et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140078345 | Showering | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140098792 | Wang et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140100774 | Showering | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140100813 | Showering | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140103115 | Meier et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140104413 | McCloskey et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140104414 | McCloskey et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140104416 | Li et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140104451 | Todeschini et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140106594 | Skvoretz | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140106725 | Sauerwein | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140108010 | Maltseff et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140108402 | Gomez et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140108682 | Caballero | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140110485 | Toa et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140114530 | Fitch et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140121438 | Kearney | May 2014 | A1 |
20140121445 | Ding et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140124577 | Wang et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140124579 | Ding | May 2014 | A1 |
20140125842 | Winegar | May 2014 | A1 |
20140125853 | Wang | May 2014 | A1 |
20140125999 | Longacre et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140129378 | Richardson | May 2014 | A1 |
20140131441 | Nahill et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140131443 | Smith | May 2014 | A1 |
20140131444 | Wang | May 2014 | A1 |
20140131448 | Xian et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140133379 | Wang et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140136208 | Maltseff et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140140585 | Wang | May 2014 | A1 |
20140151453 | Meier et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140152882 | Samek et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140158770 | Sevier et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140159869 | Zumsteg et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140166755 | Liu et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140166757 | Smith | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140166759 | Liu et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140168787 | Wang et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140175165 | Havens et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140175172 | Jovanovski et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140191644 | Chaney | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140191913 | Ge et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140197238 | Lui et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140197239 | Havens et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140197304 | Feng et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140203087 | Smith et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140204268 | Grunow et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140214631 | Hansen | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140217166 | Berthiaume et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140217180 | Liu | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140231500 | Ehrhart et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140232930 | Anderson | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140247315 | Marty et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140263493 | Amurgis et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140263645 | Smith et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140270196 | Braho et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140270229 | Braho | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140278387 | DiGregorio | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140282210 | Bianconi | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140284384 | Lu et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140288933 | Braho et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140297058 | Barker et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140299665 | Barber et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140312121 | Lu et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140319220 | Coyle | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140319221 | Oberpriller et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140326787 | Barten | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140332590 | Wang et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140344943 | Todeschini et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140346233 | Liu et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140351317 | Smith et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140353373 | Van Horn et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140361073 | Qu et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140361082 | Xian et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140362184 | Jovanovski et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140363015 | Braho | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140369511 | Sheerin et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140374483 | Lu | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140374485 | Xian et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150001301 | Ouyang | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150001304 | Todeschini | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150003673 | Fletcher | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150009338 | Laffargue et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150009610 | London et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150014416 | Kotlarsky et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150021397 | Rueblinger et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150028102 | Ren et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150028103 | Jiang | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150028104 | Ma et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150029002 | Yeakley et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150032709 | Maloy et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150039309 | Braho et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150040378 | Saber et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150048168 | Fritz et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150049347 | Laffargue et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150051992 | Smith | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150053766 | Havens et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150053768 | Wang et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150053769 | Thuries et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150062366 | Liu et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150063215 | Wang | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150063676 | Lloyd et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150069130 | Gannon | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150070418 | MacClary | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150071818 | Todeschini | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150083800 | Li et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150086114 | Todeschini | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150088522 | Hendrickson et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150096872 | Woodburn | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150099557 | Pettinelli et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150100196 | Hollifield | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150102109 | Huck | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150115035 | Meier et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150127791 | Kosecki et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150128116 | Chen et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150129659 | Feng et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150133047 | Smith et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150134470 | Hejl et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150136851 | Harding et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150136854 | Lu et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150142492 | Kumar | May 2015 | A1 |
20150144692 | Hejl | May 2015 | A1 |
20150144698 | Teng et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150144701 | Xian et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150149946 | Benos et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150161429 | Xian | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150169925 | Chang et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150169929 | Williams et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150186703 | Chen et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150193644 | Kearney et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150193645 | Colavito et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150199957 | Funyak et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150204671 | Showering | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20160080603 | Miyake | Mar 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2011-201152 | Oct 2011 | JP |
2013163789 | Nov 2013 | WO |
2013173985 | Nov 2013 | WO |
2014019130 | Feb 2014 | WO |
2014110495 | Jul 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,179 for Dimensioning System With Multipath Interference Mitigation, filed Oct. 21, 2014 (Thuries et al.); 30 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/264,173 for Autofocus Lens System for Indicia Readers, filed Apr. 29, 2014, (Ackley et al.); 39 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/453,019 for Dimensioning System With Guided Alignment, filed Aug. 6, 2014 (Li et al.); 31 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/452,697 for Interactive Indicia Reader , filed Aug. 6, 2014, (Todeschini); 32 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/231,898 for Hand-Mounted Indicia-Reading Device with Finger Motion Triggering, filed Apr. 1, 2014 (Van Horn et al.); 36 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/715,916 for Evaluating Image Values, filed May 19, 2015 (Ackley); 60 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/513,808 for Identifying Inventory Items in a Storage Facility, filed Oct. 14, 2014 (Singel et al.); 51 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/458,405 for an Electronic Device, filed Jun. 19, 2013 (Fitch et al.); 22 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/459,620 for an Electronic Device Enclosure, filed Jul. 2, 2013 (London et al.); 21 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/483,056 for Variable Depth of Field Barcode Scanner, filed Sep. 10, 2014 (McCloskey et al.); 29 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/531,154 for Directing an Inspector Through an Inspection, filed Nov. 3, 2014 (Miller et al.); 53 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/525,068 for Tablet Computer With Removable Scanning Device, filed Apr. 27, 2015 (Schulte et al.); 19 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/468,118 for an Electronic Device Case, filed Sep. 26, 2013 (Oberpriller et al.); 44 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/340,627 for an Axially Reinforced Flexible Scan Element, filed Jul. 25, 2014 (Reublinger et al.); 41 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/676,327 for Device Management Proxy for Secure Devices, filed Apr. 1, 2015 (Yeakley et al.); 50 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/257,364 for Docking System and Method Using Near Field Communication, filed Apr. 21, 2014 (Showering); 31 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/327,827 for a Mobile-Phone Adapter for Electronic Transactions, filed Jul. 10, 2014 (Hejl); 25 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/334,934 for a System and Method for Indicia Verification, filed Jul. 18, 2014 (Hejl); 38 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/530,600 for Cyclone, filed Jun. 18, 2015 (Vargo et al); 16 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/707,123 for Application Independent DEX/UCS Interface, filed May 8, 2015 (Pape); 47 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/283,282 for Terminal Having Illumination and Focus Control, filed May 21, 2014 (Liu et al.); 31 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/619,093 for Methods for Training a Speech Recognition System, filed Feb. 11, 2015 (Pecorari); 35 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/524,186 for Scanner, filed Apr. 17, 2015 (Zhou et al.); 17 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,407 for Method and System to Protect Software-Based Network-Connected Devices From Advanced Persistent Threat, filed May 6, 2015 (Hussey et al.); 42 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/614,706 for Device for Supporting an Electronic Tool on a User'S Hand, filed Feb. 5, 2015 (Oberpriller et al.); 33 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/628,708 for Device, System, and Method for Determining the Status of Checkout Lanes, filed Feb. 23, 2015 (Todeschini); 37 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/704,050 for Intermediate Linear Positioning, filed May 5, 2015 (Charpentier et al.); 60 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/529,563 for Adaptable Interface for a Mobile Computing Device, filed Oct. 31, 2014 (Schoon et al.); 36 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,012 for Hands-Free Human Machine Interface Responsive to a Driver of a Vehicle, filed May 6, 2015 (Fitch et al.); 44 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/715,672 for Augumented Reality Enabled Hazard Display, filed May 19, 2015 (Venkatesha et al.); 35 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/695,364 for Medication Management System, filed Apr. 24, 2015 (Sewell et al.); 44 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/664,063 for Method and Application for Scanning a Barcode With a Smart Device While Continuously Running and Displaying an Application on the Smart Device Display, filed Mar. 20, 2015 (Todeschini); 37 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/735,717 for Indicia-Reading Systems Having an Interface With a User'S Nervous System, filed Jun. 10, 2015 (Todeschini); 39 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/527,191 for Method and System for Recognizing Speech Using Wildcards in an Expected Response, filed Oct. 29, 2014 (Braho et al.); 45 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/702,110 for System and Method for Regulating Barcode Data Injection Into a Running Application on a Smart Device, filed May 1, 2015 (Todeschini et al.); 38 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/535,764 for Concatenated Expected Responses for Speech Recognition, filed Nov. 7, 2014 (Braho et al.); 51 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/687,289 for System for Communication Via a Peripheral Hub, filed Apr. 15, 2015 (Kohtz et al.); 37 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/747,197 for Optical Pattern Projector, filed Jun. 23, 2015 (Thuries et al.); 33 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/674,329 for Aimer for Barcode Scanning, filed Mar. 31, 2015 (Bidwell); 36 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/702,979 for Tracking Battery Conditions, filed May 4, 2015 (Young et al.); 70 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/529,441 for Indicia Reading Device, filed Jun. 8, 2015 (Zhou et al.); 14 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/747,490 for Dual-Projector Three-Dimensional Scanner, filed Jun. 23, 2015 (Jovanovski et al.); 40 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/740,320 for Tactile Switch for a Mobile Electronic Device, filed Jun. 16, 2015 (Barndringa); 38 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/695,923 for Secure Unattended Network Authentication, filed Apr. 24, 2015 (Kubler et al.); 52 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/740,373 for Calibrating a Volume Dimensioner, filed Jun. 16, 2015 (Ackley et al.); 63 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/367,978, filed Feb. 7, 2012, (Feng et al.); now abandoned. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/462,801 for Mobile Computing Device With Data Cognition Software, filed Aug. 19, 2014 (Todeschini et al.); 38 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/596,757 for System and Method for Detecting Barcode Printing Errors, filed Jan. 14, 2015 (Ackley); 41 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/277,337 for Multipurpose Optical Reader, filed May 14, 2014 (Jovanovski et al.); 59 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,405 for Indicia Reader for Size-Limited Applications, filed Mar. 7, 2014 (Feng et al.); 42 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/662,922 for Multifunction Point of Sale System, filed Mar. 19, 2015 (Van Horn et al.); 41 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/446,391 for Multifunction Point of Sale Apparatus With Optical Signature Capture, filed Jul. 30, 2014 (Good et al.); 37 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/528,165 for In-Counter Barcode Scanner, filed May 27, 2015 (Oberpriller et al.); 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/528,890 for Mobile Computer Housing, filed Jun. 2, 2015 (Fitch et al.); 61 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/614,796 for Cargo Apportionment Techniques, filed Feb. 5, 2015 (Morton et al.); 56 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/516,892 for Table Computer, filed Feb. 6, 2015 (Bidwell et al.); 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/523,098 for Handle for a Tablet Computer, filed Apr. 7, 2015 (Bidwell et al.); 17 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/578,627 for Safety System and Method, filed Dec. 22, 2014 (Ackley et al.); 32 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/573,022 for Dynamic Diagnostic Indicator Generation, filed Dec. 17, 2014 (Goldsmith); 43 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/529,857 for Barcode Reader With Security Features, filed Oct. 31, 2014 (Todeschini et al.); 32 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,195 for Handheld Dimensioning System With Feedback, filed Oct. 21, 2014 (Laffargue et al.); 39 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,211 for System and Method for Dimensioning, filed Oct. 21, 2014 (Ackley et al.); 33 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,233 for Handheld Dimensioner With Data-Quality Indication, filed Oct. 21, 2014 (Laffargue et al.); 36 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/533,319 for Barcode Scanning System Using Wearable Device With Embedded Camera, filed Nov. 5, 2014 (Todeschini); 29 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/748,446 for Cordless Indicia Reader With a Multifunction Coil for Wireless Charging and Eas Deactivation, filed Jun. 24, 2015 (Xie et al.); 34 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/528,590 for Electronic Device, filed May 29, 2015 (Fitch et al.); 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,249 for Handheld Dimensioning System With Measurement-Conformance Feedback, filed Oct. 21, 2014 (Ackley et al.); 36 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/519,017 for Scanner, filed Mar. 2, 2015 (Zhou et al.); 11 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/398,542 for Portable Electronic Devices Having a Separate Location Trigger Unit for Use in Controlling an Application Unit, filed Nov. 3, 2014 (Bian et al.); 22 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/405,278 for Design Pattern for Secure Store, filed Mar. 9, 2015 (Zhu et al.); 23 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/590,024 for Shelving and Package Locating Systems for Delivery Vehicles, filed Jan. 6, 2015 (Payne); 31 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/568,305 for Auto-Contrast Viewfinder for an Indicia Reader, filed Dec. 12, 2014 (Todeschini); 29 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/526,918 for Charging Base, filed May 14, 2015 (Fitch et al.); 10 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/580,262 for Media Gate for Thermal Transfer Printers, filed Dec. 23, 2014 (Bowles); 36 pages. |
Combined Search and Examination Report in counterpart GB Application No. 1613496.7 dated Feb. 7, 2017, pp. 1-8. |
Rejection in related Chinese Application No. 201620871838.2 dated Jul. 21, 2017, pp. 1-2. |
English translation of Rejection in related Chinese Application No. 201620871838.2 dated Jul. 21, 2017, pp. 1-3. |
Rejection in related Chinese Application No. 201620871838.2 dated Aug. 20, 2018, pp. 1-3. |
English translation of Rejection in related Chinese Application No. 201620871838.2 dated Aug. 20, 2018, pp. 1-4. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170046603 A1 | Feb 2017 | US |