Under 35 U.S.C. 119 and 120, this application claims the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/418,029, filed on Nov. 30, 2010, entitled “Apparatus and Method for the Control of Docking Mode Engine Throttle for Inboard and Outboard Boat Motors,” the entire contents and references of which are incorporated herein by this reference.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates principally to the field of watercraft control systems and, more particularly, to the fields of throttle and transmission controls and joystick maneuvering systems for watercraft.
2. Related Art
The age-old boat throttle lever arm has survived the test of time as an indispensible controller choice for a vast array of boat designs. The throttle arm pivots forward and backward to control the magnitude of forward or rearward velocity of the boat based on how far it pivots from the vertical and, when vertical, the engine is kept in neutral and usually has to be released from neutral by pressing a mechanical or electrical release button, trigger or the like.
Since the advent of directed watercraft thrust systems and all of their versatile joystick control interfaces more than fifty years ago, helmsman have also long been able to easily maneuver their boats in all sorts of directions—forward, backward, sideways, and spin-on-a-dime-ways—all with the touch of a joystick. Many watercraft systems use such approaches, which are often commonly referred to as pod drives, azimuth thrusters, tunnel thrusters, dynamic propulsion, and Can-based propulsion. Some thrust systems include fixed-pitch propeller hydraulic and mechanical thrusters with direct engine drive, electric drive or hydraulic drive, and underwater mountable thrusters for a wide variety of marine applications. Such thrust systems commonly come with integrated or modular electronic control systems, with or without prime mover controls, and have become standardized in many respects.
Directed thrust systems are sometimes used as the primary propulsion system, but many different types of watercraft use a traditional propulsion system for typical and high-speed operation, together with an auxiliary directed thrust system for low-speed or dynamic maneuvering, such as for docking or the like.
A vast number of thrust systems and controller options are available from numerous commercial operations such as Volvo, Zeus, Mercury, ZF Marine, Mastercraft, ThrustMasters and EControls (Applicant), even for straight drives. The problems and obstacles of the prior art systems are evident to those of skill in the art and will be further evident from the following descriptions.
Principal objects of the present invention are to improve watercraft thrust systems and to enable versatile watercraft propulsion systems that overcome the obstacles of the prior art while also advancing the general objects of watercraft controls.
The scope of the invention will be appreciated from the accompanying claims, as they may be added, clarified or otherwise amended during the course of prosecution, and many other objects features and advantages will become evident from the following descriptions as considered in light of the prior art, and it is intended that such objects, features and advantages are within the scope of the present invention.
To the accomplishment of all the above and related objectives, it should be recognized that this invention may be embodied in the form illustrated in the accompanying drawings, attention being called to the fact, however, that the drawings are illustrative only, and that changes may be made in the specifics illustrated or described.
Reference is made first to
The motions that are controlled by the apparatus and methods of the present invention include each of the six motions identified in
In summary, the various slower motion actions associated with the docking or undocking of a watercraft are exhibited in
Reference is now made to
As suggested by the dashed outline boxes in
Motion director/sensors 20, 22 and 24 serve to sense manual movement of the throttle handle 14 relative to the throttle arm 12. In their most basic form, such motion director/sensors 20, 22 and 24 may be split component sensors, which means that (i) they have two components or groups of components and (ii) that they function to detect movement of one of the components or groups relative to the other. As evident to those of skill in the art, one of the two split components or groups of components of each of motion director/sensors 20, 22 and 24 is on (or in fixed relation to) the handle 14, and the other of the two split components or groups of components is on (or in fixed relation to) the throttle arm 12. Such motion director/sensors 20, 22 and 24 may be split component sensors comprising a plurality or an array of permanent magnets whose motion relative to a spaced-apart, but magnetically adjacent, sensor, may be measured and utilized to sense the manual motion of the handle 14 relative to the throttle arm 12, which in turn reflects the intended motion of the watercraft as manually indicated by the operator. The positioning and placement of these split sensors 20, 22, and 24 must, of course, relate to the particular manner in which the throttle handle 14 moves with respect to throttle arm 12, or in the case of one of the alternate embodiments described below, the manner in which an upper section of the throttle arm moves with respect to a lower section of the throttle arm.
The other motion director/sensor—namely forward/reverse director/sensor 28—serves to sense motion for the customary function of throttle arms—to sense manual pivotal movement of the throttle arm 12 relative to its base. Forward/reverse director/sensor 28 also may be a split component sensor, such that one of its split components or groups of components is on (or in fixed relation to) the throttle arm 12, and the other of the two split components or groups of components is on (or in fixed relation to) the base about which throttle arm 12 pivots. Likewise, motion director/sensor 28 may be a split component sensor comprising a plurality or an array of permanent magnets whose motion relative to a spaced-apart, but magnetically adjacent, sensor, may be detected and utilized to sense the manual motion of the throttle arm 12 relative to its base, which in turn reflects the intended gross forward/reverse motion of the watercraft as manually indicated by the operator. The positioning and placement of split sensor 28 must, of course, also relate to the particular manner in which the throttle arm 12 moves with respect to its base. The forward/reverse motion director/sensor component 28 associated with the gross forward and reverse motion of watercraft 10 may reside in its ordinary place at or near the rotating/pivoting base 18 of the throttle arm 12.
Each of the throttle handle and arm motion sensors are electrically or electronically connected to watercraft motor controller 32. Motor controller 32 includes engine speed controls, rudder controls, and trim plate controls. Motor control is therefore electrically or mechanically connected to the watercraft motor 34, the watercraft rudders 36, and the watercraft trim plates 38.
Reference is next made to
The throttle assembly shown in
In addition to the standard forward/reverse gross motor control typical with most throttle mechanisms, the first embodiment of the present invention adds additional controls associated with the motion of throttle handle 14 with respect to throttle arm 12. In this first embodiment, throttle handle 14 is configured to either remain fixed with respect to throttle arm 12 or to be released from its fixed configuration to effect the additional and finer controls over the motion of the watercraft. In the first preferred embodiment, this released motion of throttle handle 14 with respect to throttle arm 12 would typically only occur when the watercraft is in an otherwise locked neutral condition. The same mechanism that locks and releases the throttle arm from its standard neutral condition could effect the lock release function for throttle handle 14 with respect to throttle arm 12. Alternately, a second electromechanical control could serve to release and lock the new motion of throttle handle 14 with respect to throttle arm 12.
The basic control motions of throttle handle 14 with respect to throttle arm 12 are shown in
Those skilled in the art will recognize that the fine forward/reverse motion control 42 may be omitted and the continued use of the gross forward/reverse control 46 may achieve the required forward and reverse motions. In the preferred embodiment, however, a smoother and less abrupt forward and reverse control over the motor may be effected by this finer motion of throttle handle 14 with respect to throttle arm 12. In summary, a finer and more accurate control of the watercraft adjacent a dock may be effected by the three basic control motions functionally associated with throttle handle 14 in its released movement with respect to throttle arm 12.
Reference is next made to
In this second preferred embodiment, the same basic motions that are effected on the throttle handle in the first preferred embodiment may be effected on the upper portion of the throttle handle/throttle arm configuration as shown. These include the rotational control (turning) 40, the fine forward/reverse control 42, and the port/starboard lateral control 44. In this second preferred embodiment, imparting each of these three motions to the “split” throttle arm section may preferably be accomplished by tilting motions rather than sliding motions. In other words, while the rotational motion 40 may still be effected by simply turning throttle handle 54 and thereby turning upper throttle arm section 60 with respect to lower throttle arm section 62, the remaining two motions of the system of the present invention, fine forward/reverse control 42, and port/starboard lateral control 44, may best be effected by a tilting motion of the handle as opposed to a sliding motion. Again, various mechanical structures associated with the junction 64 between upper throttle arm section 60 and lower throttle arm section 62 are anticipated. The basic requirement in either of the two sub-embodiments described within
Reference is finally made to
The electromechanical connections between the various moving components of the throttle handle assembly are as described above, or, with regard to gross forward/reverse control, are as is typical in the industry. The objective of the present invention is to provide finer, more sensitive motion control to the throttle handle, as in the nature of a joystick controller, to effect the finer motions required by the operator of the watercraft when approaching or departing from a dock. These finer motions are imparted to either the connection between the throttle handle and the throttle arm, as in the first and third embodiments, or between an upper and lower section of the throttle arm, as in the second embodiment. Once again, the second embodiment may operate in one of two manners, either through the sliding motion of the joint between the upper and lower sections of the throttle arm, or preferably through a tilting motion of the joint, again through mechanical structures capable of functioning much in the nature of a joystick or sliding controller.
Although the present invention has been described in conjunction with the above described preferred embodiments, alternate structures and functions will be anticipated by those skilled in the art that do not depart from the basic structures and method steps of the present invention. As there are many different types of small watercraft throttle assemblies, the basic principles of the present invention are generally capable of being implemented on most, if not all, of these various throttle assemblies. The electrical/electronic control signals that are required by the watercraft controller system may also vary depending upon the watercraft. The principles of the present invention are anticipated to operate well in conjunction with a wide variety of electrical/electronic control signal requirements.
Various existing throttle control assemblies may utilize separate or alternate control mechanisms for some of the finer motions associated with a watercraft in a docking or undocking mode. These alternate control mechanisms, however, are not integrated into the handle component of the throttle and therefore do not provide the same ease of use as the systems and methods of the present invention. As indicated above, one objective of the present invention is to provide all of the fine motor control necessary to effect a smooth and accurate docking action for the watercraft without the necessity of moving the operator's hand from the throttle control mechanism to some other steering control mechanism. Further modifications of the systems and methods of the present invention are anticipated that still fall within the spirit and scope of the claimed invention.
It is also recognized that the systems and methods of the present invention might be implemented in OEM products or as a retrofit device adaptable to any of a number of existing throttle/shift control systems. Still other alternatives are also within the scope of the invention for purposes of integrating a versatile throttle handle of the present teachings in boats with electronic engine interface, ZF transmissions and “Smart Command” control. As will be evident, in some retrofit environments, intermediate electronics may be necessary to translate the various rotational and translational displacements of the throttle handle to a signal recognizable by an existing electronic control unit. Various signal translators may be provided in order to match the sensor associated with such movements to the particular signal input requirements of a specific electronic engine control unit. Such modifications to achieve a retrofit application versus an original equipment system installation will be apparent to those skilled in the art.
Numerous other features, objects, advantages, alternatives, variations, equivalents, substitutions, combinations, simplifications, elaborations, distributions, enhancements, improvements or eliminations (collectively, “variations”) will be evident from these descriptions to those skilled in the art, especially when considered in light of a more exhaustive understanding of the numerous difficulties and challenges faced by the art, all of which should be considered within the scope of the invention, at least to the extent substantially embraced by the invention as defined in the claims (including any added claims and any amendments made to those claims in the course of prosecuting this and related applications).
In all respects, it should also be understood that the drawings and detailed description herein are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive manner, and are not intended to limit the invention to the particular forms and examples disclosed. Rather, the invention includes all variations generally within the scope and spirit of the invention as claimed. Any current, amended, or added claims should be interpreted to embrace all further modifications, changes, rearrangements, substitutions, alternatives, design choices, and embodiments that may be evident to those of skill in the art, whether now known or later discovered. In any case, all substantially equivalent systems, articles, and methods should be considered within the scope of the invention and, absent express indication otherwise, all structural or functional equivalents are anticipated to remain within the spirit and scope of the present inventive system and method.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2402724 | Bidwell | Jun 1946 | A |
3085447 | Shay | Apr 1963 | A |
3940674 | Gill | Feb 1976 | A |
4691659 | Ito et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4942838 | Boyer et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4962717 | Tsumiyama | Oct 1990 | A |
5090929 | Rieben | Feb 1992 | A |
5362269 | Leach | Nov 1994 | A |
5392871 | McFarland | Feb 1995 | A |
5854622 | Brannon | Dec 1998 | A |
6230642 | McKenney | May 2001 | B1 |
6375522 | Bellens et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6511354 | Gonring et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6518524 | Brandt et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6538217 | Eriksen et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6684803 | Dickson | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6693625 | Armstrong | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6865996 | Borrett | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6896563 | Dickson | May 2005 | B1 |
6942531 | Fell et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
RE39032 | Gonring et al. | Mar 2006 | E |
7127333 | Avidsson | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7216599 | Morvillo | May 2007 | B2 |
7305928 | Bradley et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7467595 | Lanyi et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7524219 | Torrangs et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7575491 | Martin | Aug 2009 | B1 |
20070277721 | Crotts | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20090038523 | Blagirev | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090093174 | Rul | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090124144 | Rul | May 2009 | A1 |
20090173268 | Morvillo | Jul 2009 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
“Launching the Best Performance on the Water”; Zeus, Boat Control; www.cmdmarine.com/prop/zeusover.html; as early as Jul. 13, 2009. |
“Joystick Docking System”; Axius System; www.mercruiseraxius.com; as early as Feb. 27, 2009. |
“Joystick for Volvo Penta IPS”; Volvo Penta Global; www.volvopenta.com/volvopenta/global/en-gb/marine—leisure—engines/accessories/ips—accessories/joystick.com; as early as Feb. 27, 2010. |
“CMD Beats Volvo Penta to Sterndrive Joystick System”; www.boattest.com/resources/view—news.aspx; Sep. 17, 2007. |
“Axius”, Mercury Marine; www.mercurymarine.com/engines/mercruiser/features/axius.com; as early as Jun. 1, 2011. |