Not applicable.
Not applicable.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a workstation and more particularly to a very versatile workstation having two movably connectable tables which come together depending on need.
2. Description of the Related Art
The workplace environment has been changing from one of enclosed offices to fixed cubicles, and more recently, to open spaces with movable furniture that allow workstations to be created as a need arises.
The art is replete with examples of tables or desks having computers including the following U.S. Pat. Nos.: 6,220,180; 6,202,567; 6,170,410; 6,003,452; 5,862,761; 5,765,315; 5,666,887; 4,408,543; 4,365,561; 4,112,859; and 4,066,023.
Unfortunately, none of these references provide the versatility needed in today's office environment.
The versatility absent from the earlier art has been provided by the present invention. What is described here is a versatile workstation system comprising a first table having an upper work surface disposed at a first height from a floor upon which the table is supported and a second table having an upper work surface disposed at a second height from the floor, the second table having a computer support structure extending from a bottom surface and the second table being mounted to wheels, where the first and second tables are removably connected to each other and the second table is movable from a connected position to a distant disconnected position.
There are a number of advantages, features and objects achieved with the present invention which are believed not to be available in earlier related devices. For example, major advantages are that the present invention provides a versatile workspace and allows a user to use one table as a desk or conference table or, with the second table, as a computer station. The computer station is created by simply rolling up the second table which is carrying one or two CPUs, one or two monitors and one or two keyboards. The computer workstation in conjunction with the first mentioned table may support either one or two people. Another feature of the present invention is that the two table workstation is simple, inexpensive and easily arranged.
A more complete understanding of the present invention and other objects, advantages and features thereof will be gained from a consideration of the following description of a preferred embodiment read in conjunction with the accompanying drawing provided herein. The preferred embodiment represents an example of the invention which is described here in compliance with Title 35 U.S.C. section 112 (first paragraph), but the invention itself is defined by the attached claims.
While the present invention is open to various modifications and alternative constructions, the preferred embodiment shown in the various figures of the drawing will be described herein in detail. It is understood, however, that there is no intention to limit the invention to the particular embodiment, form or example disclosed. On the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalent structures and methods, and alternative constructions falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as expressed in the appended claims, pursuant to Title 35 U.S.C. section 112 (second paragraph).
The simplicity and versatility of the workstation system disclosed here may be understood by referring now to
Supported by the second table 14 are two computer monitors 16, 18 and two CPUs 20, 22. Computer keyboards 24, 26 are positioned on the front table 12 which may also support a mouse (not shown) for each of the computers. In the arrangement shown in
The front table 12 is shown without any computer equipment in FIG. 7. The front table includes an upper work surface or panel 24, two depending legs 26, 28 and a set of four casters 30, 32, 36, 38.
The front table 12 is constructed to stand at a first height which typically is about 27 inches above a floor 40 on which the table stands. At that height, the table may be used as a desk or as a conference table or both depending upon need. A more detailed description of the table is provided in a co-pending application owned by the assignee of the present application, Ser. No. 10/284,678 entitled “A Folding And Tilting Table”. This co-pending application is incorporated herein by reference. The above identified application describes a table which may be tilted and/or folded so that it may be set aside for short or long term storage. These features add to the versatility of the workstation system disclosed here. It should be understood that a non-folding, non-tilting table may also be used if desired.
The rear table 14 is illustrated in more detail in the
The rear table 14 includes a bottom surface 60 from which extends a computer support structure 62. The computer support structure includes an inverted T-shaped bracket 64. The T-shaped bracket includes a vertical stem 66 and two horizontal arms 68, 70. Laterally spaced from the stem 66 are two vertically extending arms 72, 74 that parallel the stem 66. As shown in
The rear table also includes a downwardly extending modesty panel 76 which is spaced rearwardly of the computer support structure 62 to hide the CPUs from an observer standing to the rear of the workstation system. Further rearwardly of the modesty panel is a wire management structure 80 for organizing and concealing the various electrical and data transmission wires, cords, cables and the like which invariably attend a computer.
Attached at the forward edge 82 of the rear table 14 are a pair of connector brackets 84, 86 which are used to engage the rear table to the front table when the two are in their connected position such as shown in FIG. 1. The connector brackets may each include a horizontal arm 88, 90 which is fastened to the bottom surface 60 of the rear table, vertical arm 92, 94 to position the bracket above the upper work surface 42 of the rear table and a horizontally extending arm 96, 98 with a screw or pin receiving slot 100, 102. The pins 101, 103, connected to the front table, are illustrated in FIG. 5.
The operation of the workstation system is simple, easy and quickly accomplished. For example, the workstation system is shown in its operational mode in
The tables are easily and quickly disengaged simply by moving the tables laterally to each other so as to disengage the pins and connector brackets after the keyboards and mice are placed on the rear table. Thereafter, the rear table may be rolled to a storage position or a position at an unobtrusive location. Since all of the equipment and electrical cords are carried by the rear table, there need be no disconnection or disassembly of equipment other than perhaps an unplugging of the main electrical cord from a socket near the front table. Of course, if the rear table is not moved far, a long cord may remain plugged into the socket whether the tables are in connected mode or disconnected mode. This allows for a easy and quick disengagement of the two tables to allow the front table to be used as a desk or conference table without interference from computer equipment. In a conference table mode other chairs may be brought up to all sides of the table without any hindrance from equipment or wires, cords or the like.
When there is a need for the users to operate the computers, the two tables may be easily brought together and engaged. As can be appreciates, this may also be done easily, simply and quickly.
The above specification describes in detail the preferred embodiment of the present invention. Other examples, embodiments, modifications and variations will, under both the literal claim language and the doctrine of equivalents, come within the scope of the invention defined by the appended claims. For example, changing the absolute or relative heights of the two table are considered equivalent structures and will also come within the literal language of the claims. Also having a front table without wheels will come within the literal language of the claims as will tables with different shapes or design features. Still other alternatives will also be equivalent as will many new technologies. There is no desire or intention here to limit in any way the application of the doctrine of equivalents nor to limit or restrict the scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4066023 | Hughes | Jan 1978 | A |
4112859 | Willenbacher | Sep 1978 | A |
4365561 | Tellier et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4408543 | Griffin | Oct 1983 | A |
4640199 | Zigman | Feb 1987 | A |
4665836 | Burr | May 1987 | A |
4669789 | Pemberton | Jun 1987 | A |
4852500 | Ryburg et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
5118172 | Ugalde | Jun 1992 | A |
5120117 | Williams | Jun 1992 | A |
5199773 | Price, Jr. et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5437235 | Randolph | Aug 1995 | A |
5480224 | Ugalde | Jan 1996 | A |
5666887 | Grabowski et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5694861 | Laukamm-Josten | Dec 1997 | A |
5746489 | Moon | May 1998 | A |
5752449 | Simon et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758934 | Flutka et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5765315 | Nagamitsu et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5794545 | McDaniel et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5862761 | Moore | Jan 1999 | A |
5971508 | Deimen et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5988076 | Vander Park | Nov 1999 | A |
5988077 | Balderi | Nov 1999 | A |
6003452 | Moore | Dec 1999 | A |
6016755 | Trapani | Jan 2000 | A |
6029580 | Alfonso et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6135032 | Ko | Oct 2000 | A |
6161487 | Chang | Dec 2000 | A |
6170406 | Klein et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6170410 | Gioacchini et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6202567 | Funk et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6220180 | Janowitz | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6374752 | Walser | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6609465 | Kolavo | Aug 2003 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2127682 | Apr 1984 | GB |
06182236 | Jul 1994 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040149178 A1 | Aug 2004 | US |