The present disclosure relates generally to devices and methods for treating spinal conditions, and in particular, to vertebral plate systems and methods for fixation and stabilization of the spine.
The human spinal column is a highly complex structure. It includes more than twenty discrete bones, known as vertebrae, coupled sequentially to one another to house and protect critical elements of the nervous system. The cervical portion of the spine, which comprises the top of the spine up to the base of the skull, includes the first seven vertebrae.
For many reasons, such as aging and trauma, the intervertebral discs may begin to deteriorate and weaken, potentially resulting in chronic pain, degenerative disc disease, or even tearing of the disc. Ultimately, the disc may deteriorate or weaken to the point of tearing and herniation, in which the inner portions of the disc protrude through the tear. A herniated disc may press against, or pinch, the spinal nerves, thereby causing radiating pain, numbness, tingling, and/or diminished strength or range of motion.
Many treatments are available to remedy these conditions, including surgical procedures in which one or more damaged intervertebral discs are removed and replaced with a prosthetic. However, should the prosthetic protrude from between the adjacent vertebrae and thereby contact the surrounding nerves or tissues, the patient may experience additional discomfort. In procedures for remedying this problem, a vertebral plate system having one or more apertures and one or more bone screws is affixed to the vertebrae and oriented to prevent such protrusion.
A common problem associated with the use of such a vertebral plate system is the tendency of the bone screws to “back out” or pull away or otherwise withdraw from the bone into which they are mounted. This problem occurs, primarily, due to the normal torsional and bending motions of the body and spine. As the screws become loose and pull away or withdraw from the bone, the heads of the screws can rise above the surface of the vertebral plate, which results is pain and discomfort for the patient or possibly the separation of the vertebral plate from one or more vertebrae.
Therefore, a need exists for a vertebral plate that inhibits separation of the vertebral plate from a vertebral body.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure, there is provided a vertebral plate including a top and bottom surface, a plurality of orifices defined through at least one of the top and bottom surfaces, and a plurality of bone screw openings defined through the top and bottom surfaces. The plurality of orifices defined through the top surface including a different cross-section than a plurality of orifices defined through the bottom surface.
In embodiments, the vertebral plate may include a lip defined within each bone screw opening of the plurality of bone screw openings, wherein the lip is configured to engage a corresponding bone screw to retain the corresponding bone screw therein.
In embodiments, the top and bottom surfaces may include concave curvatures. The concave curvatures of the top and bottom surfaces may extend in the cephalad/caudal direction. Alternatively, the concave curvatures of the top and bottom surfaces may extend in a medial/lateral direction. Further still, the concave curvatures of the top and bottom surfaces may extend in both a cephalad/caudal direction and a medial/lateral direction.
In embodiments, the vertebral plate may be formed using an additive manufacturing process. The vertebral plate may be formed using Selective Laser Powder Processing.
In embodiments, the plurality of orifices defined through the top surface may be offset from the plurality of orifices defined through the bottom surface.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure, a vertebral plate system is provided, including a vertebral plate and a plurality of bone screws. The vertebral plate includes a top and bottom surface, a plurality of orifices defined through at least one of the top and bottom surfaces, and a plurality of bone screw openings defined through the top and bottom surfaces. The plurality of orifices defined through the top surface includes a different cross-section than the plurality of orifices defined through the bottom surface. The plurality of bone screws are configured to be advanced within the plurality of bone screw openings and driven into a bone.
In embodiments, the plurality of bone screws may be semi-constrained bone screws. The plurality of semi-constrained bone screws may include a shank having a first helical thread disposed thereon and a second helical thread disposed on a head portion thereof. The pitch of the first helical thread may be different than the pitch of the second helical thread, such that the first helical thread threads into vertebral bone whereas the second helical thread engages a lip disposed within each one of the plurality of bone screw openings, thereby retaining the semi-constrained bone screw within the vertebral plate.
In embodiments, the plurality of orifices defined through the top surface may be offset from a plurality of orifices defined through the bottom surface.
In accordance with another embodiment of the present disclosure, a method of performing spinal surgery is disclosed. The method includes inserting a vertebral plate into an incision of a patient, the vertebral plate including a top and a bottom surface, a plurality of orifices defined through at least one of the top and bottom surfaces, and a plurality of bone screw openings defined through the top and bottom surfaces. The plurality of orifices defined through the top surface includes a different cross-section than a plurality of orifices defined through the bottom surface. The method further includes advancing a plurality of bone screws within each bone screw opening of the plurality of bone screw openings and driving each bone screw of the plurality of bone screws into a bone.
In embodiments, the method may include applying a material to the vertebral plate to promote bone ingrowth within the plurality of orifices.
In embodiments, driving each bone screw of the plurality of bone screws into a bone may include driving a plurality of semi-constrained bone screws into a bone.
In embodiments, driving each bone screw of the plurality of bone screws into a vertebra may include threading a first helical thread disposed on a shank of the semi-constrained bone screw into a vertebra and engaging a second helical thread disposed on a head of the semi-constrained bone screw with a lip disposed within each bone screw opening of the plurality of bone screw openings, thereby retaining the plurality of semi-constrained bone screws within the vertebral plate.
In embodiments, the method may include advancing an interbody spacer within a prepared intervertebral space.
In embodiments, applying a material to the vertebral plate may include applying a bone growth putty to the vertebral plate to promote bone ingrowth within the plurality of orifices.
The above and other aspects, features, and advantages of the present disclosure will become more apparent in light of the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
Embodiments of the present disclosure are now described in detail with reference to the drawings in which like reference numerals designate identical or corresponding elements in each of the several views. As used herein, the term “clinician” refers to a doctor, a nurse or any other care provider and may include support personnel. Throughout this description, the term “proximal” will refer to the portion of the device or component thereof that is closer to the clinician and the term “distal” will refer to the portion of the device or component thereof that is farther from the clinician. In addition, the term “cephalad” is used in this application to indicate a direction toward a patient's head, whereas the term “caudal” indicates a direction toward the patient's feet. Further still, for the purposes of this application, the term “lateral” indicates a direction toward a side of the body of the patient, i.e., away from the middle of the body of the patient, and the term “medial” indicates a direction toward the inside of the body of the patient, i.e., toward the middle of the body of the patient. Additionally, in the drawings and in the description that follows, terms such as front, rear, upper, lower, top, bottom, and similar directional terms are used simply for convenience of description and are not intended to limit the disclosure. In the following description, well-known functions or constructions are not described in detail to avoid obscuring the present disclosure in unnecessary detail.
Referring now to the drawings,
Although generally illustrated as including a rectangular profile, it is contemplated that vertebral plate 100 may include any suitable profile capable of securing adjacent vertebra thereto, such as square, oval, circular or the like.
As best illustrated in
Vertebral plate 100 is constructed of a biocompatible material, such as commercially pure titanium or titanium alloy and includes a porosity capable of promoting bone ingrowth with vertebral plate 100. In this manner, top and bottom surfaces 102, 104 have a surface roughness that can promote bone ingrowth. The surface roughness may be in a range of about 0.10-50 μm, and preferably in a range of about 3-4 μm. As can be appreciated, top and bottom surfaces 102, 104 may include the same or different surface roughness's (i.e., the surface roughness of top surface 102 may be different than the surface roughness of bottom surface 104), or top and bottom surfaces 102, 104 may not include a surface roughness; rather, top and bottom surfaces 102, 104 may be smooth. In embodiments, top and bottom surfaces 102, 104 may include any combination of surface roughness or smooth surface. Additionally, vertebral plate 100 includes a plurality of orifices 110 defined therethrough configured to promote bone ingrowth. Although generally illustrated as including a circular cross-section, orifices 110 may include any suitable cross-section capable of promoting bone ingrowth, such as oval, square, hexagonal, diamond, rectangular, or the like (
As can be appreciated, manufacturing vertebral plate 100 using standard machining methods (e.g., lathe, mill, EDM, etc.) would be difficult. In view of this, it is contemplated that vertebral plate 100 may be manufactured by means of additive manufacturing methods (e.g., SDM, SLPP, DMLS (i.e., EOS), SLS, SLM, SHS, EBM, VAT photopolymerisation, material jetting, binder jetting, or the like). In one non-limiting embodiment, vertebral plate 100 may be manufactured using Selective Laser Powder Processing (SLPP). SLPP utilizes powdered metal and a laser which sinters or cures the metal in a selective fashion according to the design intent in thin layers. In embodiments, the layers may have a thickness of about 250 μm. Vertebral plate 100 is built layer by layer to allow for more design options and features which would be difficult to be machined using conventional methods. Specifically, a first layer of powder is applied to a specialized build plate, at which point the laser cures portions of the powder according to the design intent. At this point, a second layer is applied to the build plate and the laser is again used to cure selective portions of this second layer. This process is repeated until vertebral plate 100 is fully formed. Once vertebral plate 100 is fully formed, uncured powder is removed using compressed air or other similar means. Next, post machining is performed on vertebral plate 100 to remove any burrs or similar imperfections embedded within vertebral plate 100 during the additive manufacturing process. In embodiments, the burrs are removed by means of buffer wheels, clipper, files, or the like. One de-burred, vertebral plate 100 is heat treated, and thereafter, media blasted using aluminum oxide. Thereafter, vertebral plate 100 is immersed in a hydrofluoric bath to strip the aluminum oxide therefrom. Finally vertebral plate 100 is inspected by quality control personnel (or using automated means), cleaned via ultrasonic cleaning, dried, and packaged. Additionally, using SLPP, it is contemplated that vertebral plate 100 may be customized for a designated patient. For a detailed description of exemplary manufacturing methods, reference can be made to U.S. Pat. No. 8,590,157, issued on Nov. 26, 2013 to Kruth et al., the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Vertebral plate 100 may be constructed from titanium, titanium alloy, cobalt-chrome, ceramic, polyetheretherketone (PEEK), or any other suitable biocompatible material. In embodiments, vertebral plate 100 may be manufactured using a three-dimensional printer utilizing a biocompatible polymer.
With reference to
Alternatively, bone screw 200 may be of a semi-constrained variety wherein the head portion is pivotable with respect to a longitudinal axis of the shank, thereby allowing the head portion to pivot while the shank remains stationary. For a detailed description of exemplary semi-constrained bone screws, reference may be made to U.S. Pat. No. 8,574,272, issued Nov. 5, 2013 to Wallenstein et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 9,095,390, issued Aug. 4, 2015 to Wallenstein et al., the entire contents of each of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein.
In embodiments, it is contemplated that vertebral plate 100 and bone screws 200 may be provided in the form of a system or kit. As can be appreciated, the system or kit may include any suitable interbody spacer 300 (
With reference to
As threads 220 of the screw head 212 engage the corresponding lip 106b, screw shank 202 varies in angular orientations with respect to the axis of the bone screw opening 106. As screw shank 202 is driven into bone and the screw head 212 locked to vertebral plate 100, the screw shank 202 remains free to articulate relative to the screw head 212 and, hence, vertebral plate 100. At this point, bone growth putty or other suitable compositions (e.g., BMP, etc.) may be applied to vertebral plate 100 to promote bone ingrowth. In embodiments, an interbody spacer 300 is first advanced within a prepared intervertebral space. In this manner, the vertebral plate 100 helps prevent the interbody spacer 300 from being forced out of the intervertebral space (
For a detailed description of exemplary methods of using a vertebral plate with semi-constrained bone screws, reference may be made to U.S. Pat. No. 8,574,272, incorporated by reference hereinabove.
This process may be repeated as many times as the procedure requires, whether it be for the same vertebral plate 100 or for a plurality of vertebral plates 100 as required by the procedure being performed.
It is envisioned that the manufacturing processes and orifice designs detailed above may be utilized to form various other medical devices known in the art. In this manner, the additive manufacturing process detailed above may be employed to form corpectomy devices, fixed spinal implants, expandable spinal implants, bone screws, cervical implants, and the like. Similarly, the orifice designs detailed above may be formed in any of the before mentioned medical devices that would benefit from an increased ability to fuse with bone. Examples of such devices may be found in the following commonly owned references: U.S. Pat. No. 8,585,761 to Theofilos, U.S. Pat. No. 8,673,011 to Theofilos et al., U.S. application Ser. No. 14/936,911 to Sutterlin et al., U.S. Pat. No. 8,801,791 to Soo et al., U.S. Pat. No. 8,439,977 to Kostuik et al., U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0100131 to Wallenstein, U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2012/0179261 to Soo, U.S. Pat. No. 8,449,585 to Wallenstein et al., U.S. Pat. No. 8,814,919 to Barrus et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,733,286 to Errico et al., U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2013/0046345 to Jones et al., U.S. Pat. No. 8,961,517 to McClintock et al., U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0025573 to Abitbol et al., and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0142062 to Donald et al.
It will be understood that various modifications may be made to the embodiments of the presently disclosed vertebral plate. Therefore, the above description should not be construed as limiting, but merely as exemplifications of embodiments. Those skilled in the art will envision other modifications within the scope and spirit of the present disclosure.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/007,348, filed Jan. 27, 2016, which claims priority to, and the benefit of, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/108,197, filed on Jan. 27, 2015 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/196,371, filed on Jul. 24, 2015, the entireties of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5192327 | Brantigan | Mar 1993 | A |
5201737 | Leibinger | Apr 1993 | A |
5534031 | Matsuzaki et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5595703 | Swaelens et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5609635 | Michelson | Mar 1997 | A |
5634926 | Jobe | Jun 1997 | A |
5702449 | McKay | Dec 1997 | A |
5733286 | Errico et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5768134 | Swaelens et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5786134 | Nair et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5943235 | Earl et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5968098 | Winslow | Oct 1999 | A |
6010502 | Bagby | Jan 2000 | A |
6039762 | McKay | Mar 2000 | A |
6129730 | Bono et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6342055 | Eisermann et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6391058 | Kuslich et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6432107 | Ferree | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6454811 | Sherwood et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6520996 | Manasas et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6530955 | Boyle et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6530956 | Mansmann | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6716247 | Michelson | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6730127 | Michelson | May 2004 | B2 |
6758849 | Michelson | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6855167 | Shimp et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7238206 | Lange et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7509183 | Lin et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7645301 | Hudgins et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7665979 | Heugel | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7806911 | Peckham | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7909872 | Zipnick et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
D664252 | Weiland et al. | Jul 2012 | S |
8275594 | Lin et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8403986 | Michelson | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8439977 | Kostuik et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8449585 | Wallenstein et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8585761 | Theofilos | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8590157 | Kruth et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8673011 | Theofilos et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8697231 | Longepied et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8784721 | Philippi et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8801791 | Soo et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8814919 | Barrus et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8843229 | Vanasse et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8870957 | Vraney et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8903533 | Eggers et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8932356 | Kraus | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8961517 | McClintock et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8967990 | Weidinger et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8999711 | Harlow et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9011982 | Muller et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9283078 | Roels et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
D786434 | Trautwein | May 2017 | S |
9700431 | Nebosky et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9931148 | Grady, Jr. et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10028841 | Moore et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
20010047207 | Michelson | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047208 | Michelson | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020128714 | Manasas et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030040798 | Michelson | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030135276 | Eckman | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040024400 | Michelson | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034352 | Needham et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040243237 | Unwin et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249471 | Bindseil et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010226 | Grady et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021151 | Landis | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050055099 | Ku | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050112397 | Rolfe et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050137597 | Butler et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149192 | Zucherman et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165400 | Fernandez | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050177238 | Khandkar et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050246021 | Ringeisen et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060235403 | Blain | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060264946 | Young | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070055249 | Jensen | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070233272 | Boyce et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070260324 | Joshi et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270812 | Peckham | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270965 | Ferguson | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080009872 | Vaughen | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080097444 | Erickson et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080312743 | Vila et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090018584 | Henderson, Sr. et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030467 | Sonohata | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090048675 | Bhatnagar | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090054930 | Aflatoon | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090093881 | Bandyopadhyay et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090270986 | Christensen | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090291308 | Pfister et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090295042 | Pfister et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100004747 | Lin | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100100131 | Wallenstein | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100137990 | Apatsidis et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100228369 | Eggers et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100234966 | Lo | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100268339 | Malinin et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110054542 | Kevin | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110144752 | Defelice et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110165340 | Baumann | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110168091 | Baumann et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110190888 | Bertele et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110190904 | Lechmann et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110301709 | Kraus et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120046750 | Obrigkeit et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120143334 | Boyce et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120158062 | Nunley et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120179261 | Soo | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120191188 | Huang | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120191189 | Huang | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120203229 | Appenzeller et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120303128 | Ullrich, Jr. et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120310364 | Li et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120316650 | Ullrich, Jr. et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130046345 | Jones et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130110243 | Patterson et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130116793 | Kloss | May 2013 | A1 |
20130150893 | Kirschman | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130171019 | Gessler et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130184765 | Beyar et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130273131 | Frangov et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140088716 | Zubok et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140107785 | Geisler et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140107786 | Geisler et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140172111 | Lang et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140243901 | Mebarak | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140277491 | Fang et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140309699 | Houff | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150018956 | Steinmann et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150025573 | Abitbol et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150045924 | Cluckers et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150134063 | Steinmann et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150142062 | Donald et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150142158 | Szwedka | May 2015 | A1 |
20150367575 | Roels et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160022431 | Wickham | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160038301 | Wickham | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160058575 | Sutterlin, III et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160183990 | Koizumi | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160199193 | Willis et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160213485 | Schaufler et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160213486 | Nunley et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160213487 | Wilson et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160213488 | Moore et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20190298542 | Kloss | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190328546 | Palagi et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
103445883 | Dec 2013 | CN |
102008024281 | Dec 2009 | DE |
102008024288 | Dec 2009 | DE |
0425542 | Mar 1995 | EP |
1464307 | Oct 2004 | EP |
1905391 | Jan 2010 | EP |
2145913 | Jan 2010 | EP |
2457538 | May 2012 | EP |
1772108 | Nov 2015 | EP |
9000037 | Jan 1990 | WO |
9405235 | Mar 1994 | WO |
9419174 | Sep 1994 | WO |
9510248 | Apr 1995 | WO |
9532673 | Dec 1995 | WO |
9608360 | Mar 1996 | WO |
9628117 | Sep 1996 | WO |
9640015 | Dec 1996 | WO |
9640019 | Dec 1996 | WO |
9734546 | Sep 1997 | WO |
0025707 | May 2000 | WO |
0040177 | Jul 2000 | WO |
0066045 | Nov 2000 | WO |
0202151 | Jan 2002 | WO |
0230337 | Apr 2002 | WO |
02080820 | Oct 2002 | WO |
2006101837 | Sep 2006 | WO |
2009068021 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2011030017 | Mar 2011 | WO |
201317647 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2013155500 | Oct 2013 | WO |
2013156545 | Oct 2013 | WO |
201496294 | Jun 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US16/56834 dated Jan. 12, 2017. |
Akamaru et al., Healing of Autologous Bone in a Titanium Mesh Cage Used in Anterior Column Reconstruction After Total Spondylectomy; SPINE vol. 27, No. 13, pp. E329-E333, Jan. 2002. |
Bridwell et al.., Specialty Update, What's New in Spine Surgery, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated, pp. 1022-1030, Core 1st page of article, 2015. |
Cheung et al., Spinal Instrumentation Overview in Lumbar Degenerative Disorders: Cages, Lumbar Spine: Official Publication of the International Society for the Study of Lumbar Spine (3), pp. 286-291, 2004. |
Chong et al., The design evolution of interbody cages in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review; BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2015 16:99, pp. 1-20. |
Costa et al., Stand-alone cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of high-degree degenerative disc disease: design of a new device for an “old” technique. A prospective study on a series of 116 patients, Eur Spine J, May 2011: 20 (Suppl 1), pp. 46-56. |
Cunnigham et al, Design of Interbody Fusion Cages: Historical Considerations and Current Perspectives in Cage Technology; Surgical Techniques, Spinal Implants, pp. 421-465, 2006. |
EBI Spine Flyer, North American Spine Society 20th Annual Meeting, Sep. 27-Oct. 1, 2005. |
Extended European Search Report for EP 16 15 2952 dated Jul. 1, 2016. |
Extended European Search Report including the Written Opinion for Application No. EP 16856190.0 dated May 28, 2019. |
Fukuda A, Takemoto M, Tanaka K, Fujibayashi S, Pattanayak DK, Matsushita T, Sasaki K, Nishida N, Kokubo T, Nakamura T. Bone ingrowth into pores of lotus stem-type bioactive titanium implants fabricated using rapid prototyping technique. Bioceramics Development and Applications. Jan. 1, 2011;1, 3 pages. |
Kim et al. Spinal Instrumentation Surgical Techniques, Thieme Medical publishers, 2004, pp. 232-245, 518-524, p. 32-537, 736-743, 795-800. |
Kuslich, Lumbar Interbody Cage Fusion for Back Pain: An Update on the Bak (Bagby and Kuslich) System, SPINE: State of the Art Reviews; vol. 13, No. 2, May 1999, pp. 295-311. |
Lin et al., Interbody Fusion Gage Design Using Integrated Global Layout and Local Microstructure Topology Optimization; SPINE, vol. 29, No. 16, pp. 1747-1754,2004. |
Lin, et al. Structural and mechanical evaluations of a topology optimized titanium interbody fusion cage fabricated by selective laser melting process, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A DOI 10.1 002/jbm.a, pp. 272-279, Apr. 2007. |
McAfee, Interbody Fusion Cages in Reconstructive Operations on the Spine, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Incorporated, vol. 81A, No. 6, Jun. 1999, pp. 859-880. |
Sasso, Screws, Cages or Both?, <http://www.spineuniverse.com/professional/technology/surgical/thoracic/>, pp. 1-11, Sep. 2012. |
Sofamor Danek Interfix Thread Fusion Device, pp. 32-45, 1999. |
Stryker, Ttritanium basic science summary, technical monograph, pp. 1-2, 2016. |
Synthes Contact Fusion Cage, Technique Guide, 2007, pp. 1-16. |
Williams et al., CT Evaluation of Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Current Concepts, AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:2057-2066, Sep. 2005. |
Zdeblick, et al., L T-CAGE Lumbar Tapered Fusion Device Surgical Technique, Medtronic, pp. 1-25, 2000. |
Australian Examination Report for Application No. 2016200443 dated Sep. 11, 2019, 4 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200121470 A1 | Apr 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62196371 | Jul 2015 | US | |
62108197 | Jan 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15007348 | Jan 2016 | US |
Child | 16599736 | US |