Patent Application
20100124506
The disclosure relates to a blade for a wind turbine and in particular a blade for a vertical axis wind turbine.
A Darrieus-type vertical axis wind turbine (“VAWT”) typically has two curved blades joined at the ends to the top and bottom of a rotatable, vertical tower. The two or more blades bulge outward to a maximum diameter about midway between the blade root attachments points at the top and bottom of the tower. See U.S. Pat. No. 1,835,018 to D. J. M. Darrieus for a basic explanation of a VAWT. The rotatable, vertical tower with the blades attached will be referred to herein as a tower or tower assembly. A typical VAWT supports the bottom of the tower on a lower bearing assembly, which in turn is elevated off the ground by a base. The rotation of the tower is coupled to and drives an electrical generator, typically located in the base, which produces electrical power as the tower rotates. The top of the tower is supported by an upper bearing assembly that is held in place by guy wires or other structures. See U.S. Pat. No. 5,531,567 which shows examples of two typical VAWTs.
A key component of the VAWT is the blades, which interact with the wind to create lift forces that rotate the tower and drive the generator. The blades typically have a symmetrical or semi-symmetrical airfoil shape in cross-section with a straight chord that is oriented tangential to the local radius of the turbine. The tower rotates to give the blades greater velocity than the wind, and the angle of attack that the wind generates causes lift forces on the blades that maintain rotation of the tower. The lift forces are periodic because each blade goes through two phases of no lift per revolution when the blade is moving either straight up-wind or straight down-wind. In addition to the wind-generated lift forces, centrifugal forces also act on the blades.
A slender structure like a VAWT blade attached by its ends to a rotating axis tends to take the shape of a troposkein when the tower rotates. A troposkein is the shape that a linearly-distributed mass like a skipping rope would take under centrifugal force when the rope is spun around an axis. Considering just centrifugal forces, the spinning rope takes the troposkein shape and is loaded in pure tension because it has negligible stiffness or resistance to bending. It is desirable for a VAWT blade to have a troposkein shape in order to minimize bending stresses and fatigue loads, but a practical problem is how to design a VAWT blade so that it is flexible enough to assume a troposkein shape yet rigid enough to withstand operating loads, including the significant loads that result from gravity. Thus, it is desirable to provide a vertical axis wind turbine blade that overcomes the above problems and it is to this end that the disclosure is directed.
The disclosure is particularly applicable to a blade for a vertical axis wind turbine with the particular construction set forth below and it is in this context that the blade will be described. It will be appreciated, however, that the blade has greater utility since it may be constructed out of different materials and be used for different types of wind turbines. The disclosure is also particularly applicable to larger VAWTs rated greater than 500 kW, but the same features can be beneficial for smaller machines as well.
In one embodiment, a plurality of support frames 24 are designed to support the mast 22 of the VAWT structure 10 while it is in the assembly position which may be horizontal. The height of each support frame 24 may be different depending on the site elevation or the terrain of the ground. The mast 22 has a base part 28 wherein the mast 22 will fit accurately into a base support 36 that supports the weight of the VAWT structure 10 once it is installed. The base support may also house a generator that is coupled to the structure 10 and generates power as the blades catch the wind/air flow and turn the wind turbine. A support structure 56 may rotatably connect to the bottom portion of the VAWT structure 10 so that the VAWT structure 10 can be rotated (using a gin pole assembly 32) relative to the support structure 56 so that the bottom of the VAWT structure 10 when erected will interface with the base 36.
The VAWT structure 10 (and the mast 22 and blades 20) is erected using the gin pole assembly 32. In one implementation, the gin pole assembly 32 may include a first gin pole 32a and a second gin pole 32b that are joined together at an upper end of each gin pole by a connector. Each gin pole also has a bottom end that is pivotally anchored to the ground by a gin pole base that allows the gin pole to be pivoted about the base. In operation, the VAWT structure 10 spins about the base 36 and turns the generator that is located in the base. Each blade interacts with the wind to create lift forces that rotate the tower and drive the generator. Now, the blades are described in more detail.
One good choice of material for these blades is fiberglass/polymer fibrous composite, such as E-glass fiber/polyester resin. The thickness to chord ratio for the blades is commonly 20% or less, to avoid excessive drag for the given lift. The softer direction of bending for the blades, referred to as the “flatwise” direction, gives the blades their flexibility to follow the troposkein shape within a vertical plane. In addition, the relatively soft flatwise bending behavior allows the blades to flex inward towards the mast when high winds occur, when the machine is not operating, thus avoiding damage that would otherwise occur (the costly alternative is to make the blades much heavier and make the machine much shorter for the given diameter). The flexible nature of the lightweight blade is coordinated with the larger height to diameter ratio of the machine (2.5 to 3.5) to allow the flex or “rollthrough” of the blade without damage.
The ability to tolerate high winds by blade roll-through despite the light weight of the blade, reduces the machine cost substantially. The weight of the blade is reduced itself, and the weight of the other components that carry the blades can also be reduced (mast, struts, guy cables), because they have less blade weight to carry. A lighter machine has less rotordynamic problems so guy cables can be made smaller and less stiff. The direct cost of making the blade is reduced because it can be made straight, not curved, most efficiently by “pultrusion”, which is a low cost process of extrusion molding of composites. And finally, most importantly, the larger height to diameter ratio of the machine, allowed by and coordinated with such blade design, provides much more swept area per unit area of land, and that translates into more energy capture for a given land area. The result is a much more cost-efficient large VAWT machine.
During a high wind speed condition, the upwind blade starts at the gravity sag state as shown in
The blade stiffness and installed curvature is specifically designed to allow this roll-through behavior with acceptable bending stresses well below failure levels of the material used to manufacture each blade, such as a composite material in one embodiment. Each blade may also be made of metal material, provided the flatwise bending stiffness is kept relatively low in relation to the blade length. Any metal is usable, but lower modulus/weight metal such as aluminum is most appropriate, or metal composite designs. In addition, extrudable metals may be better for cost. For the composite blade embodiment, the composite material allows somewhat soft bending stiffness but still high torsional stiffness to resist aerodynamic flutter in operation. In one embodiment, this is achieved by using 1) a substantial percentage of bias (+/−45 degree) fibers in the blade construction, and 2) closed cross section geometry to maximize torsional rigidity, with structural continuity of +/−45 degree fibers all around the closed sections such as shown by the arrows in
As a means of illustration, one embodiment uses a blade segment length of 67.17 m across a blade span of 64.67 m. When the blade is bent into place, the bend displacement is 8.2 m, for an installed bend to span ratio of 0.127. The bending rigidity, or area moment of inertia in flatwise bending times the modulus, is 1.8E6 N-m2, giving a rigidity to span ratio of 24000 N-m, which provides the flexibility to keep bending stresses below about 140 MPa during rollthrough. Such stress is acceptable for a typical 40% bias/60% spanwise E-glass/polyester blade laminate. This not a unique set of properties that will achieve the purposes of the disclosure, but is rather just an example.
While the foregoing has been with reference to a particular embodiment of the invention, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes in this embodiment may be made without departing from the principles and spirit of the invention, the scope of which is defined by the appended claims.
