The present invention relates to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and, in particular, to radio frequency (RF) coils.
MRI has been widely used by radiologists as a powerful diagnostic tool. MRI techniques have several advantages including excellent soft tissue viewing and angiography. Neurovascular MRI has become a standard diagnostic procedure in the hospitals. Frequently, a neurovascular MRI protocol requires imaging coverage from the Circle of Willis to the aortic arch with a field-of-view (FOV) of about 36 cm. Another imaging protocol with a smaller FOV for high resolution carotid imaging is of great interest also. Finally, it would be a plus if the same neurovascular coil could be used for head/neck imaging. An ideal neurovascular RF coil would provide multiple imaging modes with different FOV, good S/N, good uniformity, and a patient friendly structure.
The concept of a co-planar array (Roemer et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,825,162) has been widely used in neurovascular coils for horizontal field systems. Typically, partially overlapped surface coils are placed in a co-planar fashion to extend the coverage as required by neurovascular imaging protocols. Multi-mode imaging is achieved by activating different combinations of coil elements. Coil isolation between neighboring elements is achieved through the well known overlapping technique to cancel the mutual inductance. Coil isolation between elements other than immediate neighbors is achieved through the application of low noise amplifiers (LNA) in the resonance circuits.
The principle of MRI involves exciting protons and detecting their free induction decay signals. Each proton possesses a tiny magnetic moment precessing about the static magnetic field. The macroscopic behavior of millions of protons can be represented by a resultant magnetization vector aligning with the static magnetic field B0. A strong RF excitation pulse effectively tips the magnetization away from B0. The free induction decay of this magnetization is detected in a plane perpendicular to B0. Thus the normal direction of an receive RF coil must be perpendicular to the direction of the static magnetic field B0 for maximal signal induction.
As a result, co-planar array coils are effective for horizontal MRI systems. However, such co-planar surface array coils are, in general, inefficient for a vertical field system because the condition required for maximal signal detection can hardly be fulfilled. Various modifications to the co-planar designs have been proposed with limited success.
A more effective array configuration is needed for a vertical field neurovascular coil to provide good S/N with multi-imaging modes.
A vertical field MRI RF coil array for neurovascular imaging includes a head section having a solenoid coil element and a quadrature coil element; a neck section having a solenoid coil element and a quadrature coil element; and a chest section having a solenoid coil element and a quadrature coil element.
An array formed of coaxial solenoid coil elements can be effective in a vertical field system. Solenoidal coils have the advantage of good sensitivity, uniformity and naturally fit to various body parts for a vertical field system.
The challenge for solenoid based coil arrays lies in the decoupling between solenoidal coil elements. Effectively suppressing the “cross-talk” between active coil elements is a requirement in order to take advantage of high efficiency arrays through simultaneous acquisition of multiple coil elements.
Advanced coils using uneven counter-rotational (UCR) coil based solenoidal arrays (Su et al., U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/085,347 issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,221,974 and double counter-rotational (DCR) coils (Su et al., 10/098,268 issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,768,303 have proven successful. These applications are incorporated herein by reference. These coils exhibit inherent decoupling between neighboring solenoid coil elements. A UCR may be, for example, a solenoid coil formed of current loops with current flowing in the same direction and a counter rotational current loop, with uneven number of turns for the two sections. A UCR coil produces a quasi-one-peak sensitivity profile and a null-B1 point at one side, through the uneven winding of its two sections. A second solenoid coil element can be placed near the null-B1 point of a UCR coil to form an inherently decoupled solenoidal array.
A DCR coil may be, for example, a solenoid coil formed of a series of current loops with a counter rotational current loop on each of the two ends of the solenoid. A DCR coil produces a quasi-one-peak sensitivity profile and two null-B1 points, one on each side of the coil. An additional solenoid coil can be placed near each one of the two null-B1 points to form an inherently decoupled solenoidal array. A DCR coil can be used as the building block to form solenoidal arrays of multiple solenoid coil elements.
Referring
The three solenoid elements are shown in
The three saddle coil elements 18, 20, 22 are shown in
The neurovascular coil array 10 takes into consideration the MRI system limitations and clinic neurovascular diagnostics needs. Presently, most of the commercial vertical MRI systems provide a useable imaging area of about 40 cm×40 cm due to magnet uniformity and gradient linearity limitations. Clinical studies show that a FOV of about 36 cm is appropriate for neurovascular imaging from the Circle of Willis to the aortic arch.
Based on the above considerations, the neurovascular coil 10 is provided with the capability of multiple imaging modes by selectively activating the coil elements. In a neurovascular imaging mode, the chest element pair 12, 18 and the neck element pair 14, 20 are activated while the head element pair 16, 22 is deactivated, providing about 36 cm FOV coverage from the Circle of Willis to the aortic arch. In a head/neck imaging mode, the head element pair 16, 22 and the neck element pair 14, 20 are activated while the chest element pair 12, 18 is deactivated, providing a 32 cm FOV. Other imaging modes are possible by activating only one of the three element pairs at a time in the head, neck or chest region. The smaller FOV allows higher resolution imaging of a particular anatomic region.
Referring to
In a neurovascular imaging mode, the counter rotational loop 145 near the head is switched off. At the same time, the counter rotational loop 144 in the chest side provides a null-B1 point as needed for decoupling with the chest solenoid element 12. This effectively operates the DCR coil in a UCR mode. In a head/neck imaging mode, the counter rotational loop 144 near the chest is switched off whereas the counter rotational loop 145 in the head side provides a null-B1 point as needed for decoupling with the head solenoid element 16. This effectively operates the DCR coil in another distinct UCR mode.
The capability of tuning the DCR coil in two distinct UCR modes is depicted in
It is also possible to switch off both counter rotational loops such that the element becomes a 3-turn “normal” solenoid in a neck-only imaging mode. The tuning can be achieved by selecting a proper value for Cn.
The multiple-mode imaging with different FOVs is advantageous and is achieved in this neurovascular coil design by implementing three coil element pairs or sections to cover three anatomic regions, the head, the neck and the chest. Due to its superior sensitivity and uniformity, a solenoid type coil element has been the preferred design for vertical field system. The ability to include three solenoid coil elements in this neurovascular coil is advantageous. This can be made possible by using a DCR coil for achieving inherent coil decoupling between neighboring solenoid coils.
Referring to
It can be seen from
It can be seen from
Various modifications can be made to the basic form of invention as discussed above. The number of solenoid coil elements is not limited to three, as many solenoid elements can be included in the array as needed by, for example, using DCR type solenoid coil elements as a building block.
The saddle coil elements can be replaced with other types of coil elements as needed provided that the produced B1 field is orthogonal to the axial B1 field generated by the solenoid element. These can be referred to generally as a quadrature coil element.
Variations to the mechanical design are also possible. For example, instead of a split head-top, a sliding head-top can be implemented to meet the preference of some patients. More and larger windows can be implemented to optimize the openness and further reduce patient claustrophobia. Instead of having a single base piece, it is also possible to separate the head base portion and make it a sliding head design. In this case, a head holder can be used as a head support. The shape of the chest-top can be optimized to better fit the body and achieve optimal signal reception. Different sizes array coils can be made to accommodate patients of different sizes.
It should be evident that this disclosure is by way of example and that various changes may be made by adding, modifying or eliminating details without departing from the fair scope of the teaching contained in this disclosure. The invention is therefore not limited to particular details of this disclosure except to the extent that the following claims are necessarily so limited.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent applications Ser. No. 60/302,185 filed Jun. 29, 2001, Ser. No. 60/276,297 filed Mar. 16, 2001, and Ser. No. 60/273,092 filed Mar. 2, 2001. This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/085,347 filed Feb. 27, 2002 issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,221,974 and Ser. No. 10/098,268 filed Mar. 15, 2002, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,768,303.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4825162 | Roemer et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
5517120 | Misic et al. | May 1996 | A |
5578925 | Molyneaux et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5592088 | Matsunaga et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5621323 | Larsen | Apr 1997 | A |
6377836 | Arakawa et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6577888 | Chan et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60302185 | Jun 2001 | US | |
60276297 | Mar 2001 | US | |
60273092 | Mar 2001 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10098268 | Mar 2002 | US |
Child | 10186032 | US | |
Parent | 10085347 | Feb 2002 | US |
Child | 10098268 | US |