The majority of cleaning fluids for household use is sold in plastic spray bottles, consisting of a bottle body with a threaded opening at the top, connected to a spray device which includes a siphon straw, trigger and pump assembly, and spray nozzle. The majority of these cleaning fluids are intended to clean horizontal surfaces (countertops, carpets, floors). To apply the spray to a horizontal surface, the user will tilt the spray bottle at an angle so the nozzle directs the spray downward. When the fluid in the bottle reaches a low level and a user attempts to apply the fluid to a horizontal surface, the bottom of the siphon straw will not remain in contact with the remaining fluid and will draw air into the straw. The user will then hold the bottle vertically to put the siphon straw in contact with the remaining fluid, prime the straw and pump with several trigger squeezes, then aim the spray nozzle downward to apply the fluid. With one or two trigger squeezes, the pump and straw are now empty, and the user will re-prime. This process is inefficient. Additionally, there will always be a small volume of liquid remaining in the bottle that the user is unable to spray, due to the siphon straw not extending to the absolute bottom of the bottle, and also due to the bottle bottom's flat shape, which spreads the remaining fluid out over the entire bottle bottom surface.
Due to their common usage in household cleaning, spray bottles represent a large economic market. In response to this opportunity, numerous inventors have designed patents attempting to increase the spray bottle's functionality. Smith, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,526,963, “HAND-HELD GRAVITY FEED SPRAY BOTTLE”, 18 Jun. 1996, discloses one such device. This innovation, which places the bottle above the spray device, has several inherent problems. The trigger actuated spray device is angled for a primary use of directing the spray horizontally. I have found that if a user desires to spray the liquid down, the spray device will be held at an extreme angle with the bottle's center of gravity extending laterally well beyond the hand grip and trigger, thus producing an undesirable moment arm on the user's wrist and forearm. Additionally, I found that the grip design is too small. A user holding Smith's bottle will find the grip extending approximately half way down their palm. I have found, through the testing of common household cleaner spray bottles, that the user's entire palm will be in contact with the bottle while actuating the trigger with their index and middle fingers and holding the bottle with their ring and pinkie finger, in order to effectively control the bottle while actuating the trigger. Manufacturing the grip on Smith's bottle to larger specifications to meet these criteria would vastly increase the size of the spray device and increase production costs. Additionally, the small grip does not lend itself well to comfortably holding the bottle, especially when it is full, at any angle other than straight up.
Wright, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,160,071, “VERTICAL SPRAY BOTTLE NOZZLE”, 3 Nov. 1992, discloses another such device. I have found that Wright's spray bottle nozzle, while angling the spray nozzle down, does not allow the user to completely consume the liquid contents of the bottle. Additionally, I found the nozzle is of large size, which would increase production price. I also found, in the case where a user wishes to apply a concentrated liquid spray to a small area on a horizontal surface, the user would find difficulty getting the spray nozzle close to the affected surface to which he desired to apply the liquid.
Ouellette, in U.S. Pat. No. 7,055,722, “SPRAY BOTTLE”, 6 Jun. 2006, discloses another such device. I have found that Ouellette's bottle, for the same reason as the aforementioned prior art spray bottle, cannot expend the entirety of the liquid from the bottle, due to the straw losing contact with the liquid at the bottom of the bottle. Additionally, I found that the straw diverter will only bend the flexible straw to an angle parallel the diverter, thus not directing the straw to the bottom of the second chamber when held horizontally with the intent of directing the spray downwards.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a spray device which can be fitted atop common cleaning fluid bottles, that allows easy application of fluid to horizontal surfaces, by way of inverting the bottle above the spray device.
It is a further object of the present invention to allow complete consumption of the fluid in the bottle.
It is a still further object of the present invention to allow unlimited spraying while inverted.
It is a still further object of the present invention to provide a device that can be effectively and comfortably operated with one hand.
In summary, the invention is a gravity fed spray bottle. The invention generally consists of a liquid spray device, including integrated liquid and air pump assembly, trigger, and nozzle, which can be attached to the opening of common threaded plastic bottles, for the purpose of inverting the bottle so the spray device is on the bottom, where the spray device, whose siphon straw (or liquid entry tube) extends only to the opening of the bottle, can feed the entirety of the liquid in the bottle to the pump assembly, and direct the spray vertically onto a horizontal surface. The nozzle of the spray device is angled similar to the vertical axis of the bottle so when the bottle is inverted, the user sprays the fluid down.
An advantage of the present invention is that it can be operated with one hand.
Another advantage of the present invention is that the liquid is gravity fed to the pump assembly, allowing complete liquid consumption while operated inverted.
A further advantage of the present invention is that the most common direction to which household cleaning solutions are applied, down, is the primary designed spray direction.
A still further advantage of the present invention is that the spray device is of relative size to existing spray bottle spray devices, and uses like parts, and thus minimizes its production costs.
A still further advantage of the present invention is that a user can easily hold and operate the spray bottle, placing their entire palm in contact with the back of the existing bottle neck without any undesirable forces or moments acting upon the user's wrist or forearm. Because the user grips the existing bottle neck, the moment arm of a full bottle is less than gripping the bottle near the opening.
A still further advantage of the present invention is that a user can adjust the direction of spray exiting the bottle with the adjustable nozzle. The user is able to spray a liquid in all directions from vertical to horizontal if so desired, without having to adjust the angle in which the spray bottle is held.
A still further advantage of the present invention is that an air pump assembly, operated when the trigger is actuated or released and returns to its resting position, pumps air into the liquid storage bottle, which replaces the expended liquid and equalizes the pressure in the bottle.
A still further advantage of the present invention is that a user can spray the entire contents of the bottle in the inverted position without having to reposition the bottle upright to relieve pressure.
Both
To operate the present invention, the user positions the bottle 47 inverted and grips the neck 45 of the bottle 47 with their index finger wrapped around the top of the finger grips 48, and their palm in contact with the opposite side of the bottle neck 45. The user grips the trigger 39 with their middle, ring, and pinkie fingers and squeezes. The force arm 37 pushes the piston in the pump assembly 33. Liquid residing in the pump assembly 33 is expelled as a spray 30 through the liquid exit tube 32 and nozzle 31 down towards the target horizontal surface. Upon trigger release, the liquid 44 residing in the bottle 47 is siphoned into the pump assembly 33 as the piston retracts. A one way check valve 70 in the liquid entry tube ensures that pressure is maintained in the pump assembly during trigger actuation. Another one way check valve 72 in the liquid exit tube 32 ensures that no air enters the pump assembly via the nozzle as the trigger retracts.
This embodiment of the present invention also includes several elements to increase the user's comfort and control. A user grips the bottle 47 by supporting the weight of the bottle 47 with their thumb and index finger. A user grips their thumb and index finger at the vertical point on the bottle 47 where the finger grips 48 meet the widening bottle body. The moment arm induced by holding the bottle 47 at any angle other than pure vertical is minimized due to the user supporting the bottle's weight near the middle of the bottle. This offers the user comfortable control of the bottle 47. Additionally, the pivot point 38 to which the trigger 39 connects extends laterally beyond the vertical line drawn down the front of the finger grips 48. When the trigger 39 is pulled, the trigger moves in a circular motion, initially in the direction of the hand grips 48 and then with a slight downward motion towards the nozzle (counter-clockwise in
The reader will see that an embodiment of the vertical spray bottle provides a user with the ability to:
The scope of the vertical spray bottle is not to be limited by the specifications illustrated. Many other variations are possible. For example, the preferred embodiment of the spray device and trigger will be made of molded plastic, but can be made of any lightweight material. Additionally, the spray device can be formed into any shape, and the orientation of internal parts altered, such that the specified advantages of the spray device are maintained.
This invention relates in general to spray bottles and in particular, to those spray bottles used to dispense common cleaning fluids, and claims the benefit of provisional patent 61/664,164.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5119974 | Mann | Jun 1992 | A |
5341967 | Silvenis | Aug 1994 | A |
5542581 | Habora et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5624060 | Ellion et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5875933 | Ellion et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6027041 | Evans | Feb 2000 | A |
6179170 | Bachand | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6394319 | Pucillo | May 2002 | B1 |
6443332 | Costea | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6732958 | Norville et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6834815 | Appleby | Dec 2004 | B2 |
7775401 | Banco et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
20050133626 | Hornsby et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20090140011 | Olson et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20110180100 | Hafer et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130341361 A1 | Dec 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61664164 | Jun 2012 | US |