This disclosure applies to systems using direct fired heating systems for the drying of lumber in which the circulation direction of air inside a kiln is periodically reversed, including but not limited to continuous and batch kilns. The continuous drying kiln (CDK) design is one in which two paths of lumber travel in opposite directions through a sequence of chambers in which wood is pre-heated, dried, equalized and then conditioned. In batch kilns the lumber stays in the kiln without movement until fully treated.
Frequently, when describing an industrial process, it is useful to note that a given parameter is substantially met. Examples may be substantially parallel, substantially perpendicular, substantially uniform, and substantially flat. In this context, substantially X means that for purposes of this industrial process it is X. So something that may not be absolutely parallel but is for all practical purposes parallel, is substantially parallel. Likewise, mixed air that has substantially uniform temperature would have temperature deviations that were inconsequential for that industrial process.
As recognized in C. E. Equipment Co. v. United States, 13 U.S.P.Q.2d 1363, 1368 (Cl. Ct. 1989), the word “substantially” in patent claims gives rise to some definitional leeway—thus the word “substantially” may prevent avoidance of infringement by minor changes that do not affect the results sought to be accomplished.
Continuous Drying Kilns.
If the first set of carriages 128 enters the structure 104 through the first end 108 and exits through the second end 112, then the second set of carriages 132 enters the structure 104 through the second end 112 and exits through the first end 108. Thus, when lumber 130 is stacked on the carriages (128 and 132) and exposed to heat in the main drying section 300, the heated lumber 136 passes near lumber that has not yet been in the main drying section 300 (green lumber 140).
Note the simplified drawing in
Turning to
Returning to
Returning to
Having an appropriate pressure gradient from the high pressure side of the center fan wall 228 to the low pressure side will cause a desired distribution of circulating air amongst the lumber 130 across the two sets of carriages (128 and 132).
To reduce the variability between lumber 130 on the first side 144 and the second side 148 of the first set of carriages 132 or the second set of carriages 132, the bidirectional fans 200 are periodically stopped and allowed to coast to a full stop. Then the bidirectional fans 200 are operated in the opposite direction to push air in the forward circulation direction 208 as shown in
Returning now to
Returning to the processing of lumber stack 156 stacked upon the first set of carriages 128, eventually, the lumber stack 156 progresses from the first end energy recovery section 310 through orthogonal baffles 324 to enter the main drying section 300.
The main drying section 300 is much like the energy recovery sections 310 and 340 with a set of bidirectional fans 200 located above a fan deck 224 circulating air alternatively in the forward circulation direction 208 and the reverse circulation direction 204. Longitudinal baffles 220 (
This mix of heated air and flue gas is returned to the main drying section 300 to increase the temperature and decrease the humidity of the main drying section 300. A recirculation blower forces heated air leaving the air blending chamber into a distribution duct 232 (
Eventually, lumber stack 156 stacked upon the first set of carriages 128 emerges from the main drying section 300 through orthogonal baffle 324 to enter the second end energy recovery section 340. Now the lumber 130 is heated lumber 136 giving off heat and drying green lumber 140 on carriages 132 on the second pathway 120. The heated lumber 136 is exposed to air moving in the forward circulation direction 208 and in the reverse circulation direction 204 as the bidirectional fans 200 are periodically turned off, allowed to coast to a stop, and then restarted in the opposite direction.
The lumber stack 156 emerges from the second end 112 and is eventually removed from the carriage 132.
Lumber on carriages 132 on the second pathway 120 receive the same sequence of treatments but travel in the opposite direction from the second end 112 to the first end 108.
Batch Kilns
In batch kilns, the entire process typically takes about twenty four hours for a complete charge, including time to load and unload the kiln and to carry out clean up or routine maintenance. While the total process time for continuous drying kilns is typically on the order of forty hours per lumber stack, the continuous process includes more even preheating and conditioning steps and produces significantly more board feet per year. The extended process of the continuous drying kilns tends to produce lumber with fewer defects than lumber from batch kilns.
Batch kilns are similar to continuous drying kilns in the essential ways in which operations are affected by pressure differentials caused by the interaction of fan reversals and the return air ducts required for direct fired heating systems. Most batch kilns are also similar in length to the middle drying sections of continuous drying kilns, about 100 feet long. Due to these similarities, many older batch kilns are currently being converted to continuous drying kilns through the process of extending the rail length inside a batch kiln and adding two end energy recovery sections on either side of the pre-existing batch structure.
Return Ducts.
U.S. Pat. No. 9,423,176 for System for Balancing Lumber Kiln Return Air referenced above, modified the prior art by adding a new in-kiln dual return duct design described below to keep the return air inside the warm kiln structure 104 of the kiln 100 to a great extent, reducing the length of the return duct between the structure and the air blending chamber 1538 (See
A direct fired burner 1534 (represented here by a flame) feeds burner exhaust at approximately 2000 degrees Fahrenheit into an air blending chamber 1538 to provide a mix of burner exhaust with kiln return air from the return duct 1530 to provide an output supplied to the main drying section 300 above the main drying section set point which is often between 240 degrees Fahrenheit and 260 degrees Fahrenheit. The heated air is supplied via the supply duct 1546 and distributed to the space between the fan deck 224 and the tops of the lumber stacks 156 via distribution duct 232 as indicated by arrows 246 before entering the main drying section 300 above the fan deck 224 through distribution vents 250. The air moving to and from the air blending chamber 1538 will be moved by a recirculation blower 1542 located after the air blending chamber 1538.
The return air flow is thus from the air blending chamber 1538, to the suction side of recirculation blower 1542, out the discharge side of recirculation blower 1542, through the supply duct 1546 to feed all of the distribution vents 250 via distribution duct 232.
The controls for dampers used in a dual return system may be connected together so that the system is precluded from closing both dampers at any one time. The duct selection dampers may either be linked to each other mechanically or by other means. They may be determined to have opposite actions so that only one of the dual return ducts is ever allowed to be open at one time. Alternatively, the duct selection dampers may also be separate and independent, in order to lower pressure in the air blending chamber under certain startup circumstances by receiving return air from both sides of the kiln at the same time.
As designed to minimize or eliminate the pressure differences experienced by the change from forward direction to reverse direction, the damper system may focus on the mixing of burner output gas from the direct fired burner to deliver a desired temperature from the outlet of the air blending chamber.
Damper Example.
Heat modulating damper 1536 (also called the heat regulating damper) is used to control the amount of kiln return air entering into the air blending chamber (1538 not shown in detail here). Opening the heat modulating damper 1536 will decrease the draw (suction) on the direct fired burner 1534, and conversely closing the heat modulating damper 1536 will increase the suction on the direct fired burner 1534. Thus, the heat modulating damper 1536 alters the ratio of kiln return air in the air blending chamber 1538 from the return duct 1530 versus burner output gas output from the direct fired burner 1534. By providing similar air flow to the heat modulating damper 1536 under both forward and reverse fan operation, the heat modulating damper 1536 may be used to control the air blending chamber 1538 and thus the output temperature of the air blending chamber rather than partially to compensate for differences in air flow from the forward and reverse fan direction.
Focus on the Air Blending Chamber.
As the focus in U.S. Pat. No. 9,423,176 issued Aug. 23, 2016 for System for Balancing Lumber Kiln Return Air was the use and placement of an internal second return duct 2330, very little detail was provided on the air blending chamber 1538. In fact, the heat input was merely represented symbolically by a flame for the direct fired burner 1534.
As the present disclosure addresses improvements to the air blending chamber, it is useful to discuss the prior art air blending chambers in greater detail. An air blending chamber that could be used in
Without adequate mixing, computer models indicated that streams of burner output gas continued to have significantly elevated temperatures relative to streams of recirculated kiln return air and these streams of gases of very different temperatures extended through the recirculation blower 1542 and into the distribution duct 232. The differences were stronger with larger systems with a larger burner and a larger blower. Thus the model indicated that the situation was tolerable for a given air blending chamber 1538 with a 35 million BTU/hr burner and a 217,000 CFM blower but became more problematic when scaled to a 40 million BTU/hr burner and a 280,000 CFM blower. The exact place where inadequate mixing becomes problematic will be a function of many design attributes such as duct sizes and blower choice but there appears to be an increased effect of non-homogenous temperature profiles as the burner/blower pair is scaled up.
While perfectly homogenous temperature profiles may not be necessary, severe deviations in from homogenous temperature profiles may mean that portions of the recirculation blower 1542 are frequently exposed to thermal excursions beyond the desired upper temperature limit. Some recirculation blowers 1542 may have a rating for extended exposure of 600 degrees Fahrenheit and may not last as long if portions are exposed to prolonged exposure of temperatures well above that rating. Newer recirculation blowers 1542 may tolerate short temperature excursions of up to 800 degrees Fahrenheit. Alternatively, a system that has a tendency for temperature excursions to reach the recirculation blower 1542 may cause the designers to choose a more expensive blower that is rated for an unusually high temperature rating to compensate. This is not an academic thought experiment. Recirculation blowers do suffer damage and need to be replaced if subject to severe temperature excursions.
But in all events, there is a desire to control the mixing to that the temperatures are substantially uniform. A measured temperature excursion above 500 degrees Fahrenheit in the supply duct 1546 may cause the controls to operate the heat modulating damper to decrease the burner output delivered to the mixing chamber assembly. If this measured value is a local hot spot rather than representative of the blended temperature, then the heat to the kiln will be attenuated and the heat treatment process slowed.
A second incentive for promoting mixing in the air blending chamber 1538 is that any thermal differences that cause some distribution vents 250 to deliver air at a much higher temperature than other distribution vents 250 will make the process of curing lumber less consistent than a kiln that has substantially uniform temperatures for the air coming out the entire set of distribution vents 250. The lack of uniform temperature from the distribution vents 250 will be particularly problematic in a batch kiln rather than a continuous drying kiln as the same lumber stack will receive overheated air repeatedly as opposed to lumber stacks on carts that are exposed to air from different distribution vents 250 over time.
Fresh air provided to the air blending chamber 1538 can quickly drop the temperature of the output of the recirculation blower 1542. A fresh air damper 1574 can be used to mix in drier fresh air as the direct fired burner 1534 is often using sawdust for fuel and that has a high water content which is passed with the burner output gas. There will frequently be a small inflow of fresh air through the fresh air damper 1574 even when the fresh air damper 1574 is nominally closed. Some models assume 5% flow of a full open fresh air damper 1574 will be passing through a closed fresh air damper 1574 as in-leakage.
As the total amount of gas that enters the air blending chamber 1538 is largely controlled by the suction of the recirculation blower 1542, the heat modulating damper 1536 can reduce the amount of air that comes from the kiln and thus increases the amount of draw from the direct fired burner 1534. If the heat modulating damper 1536 closes too rapidly so that the change in draw on the burner might be disruptive, the fresh air damper 1574 may open briefly to avoid a disruptive transient condition within the gasifier portion of the burner.
Focus on Heating Equipment.
Turning now to
Visible in this pair of drawings is the direct fired burner 1534 which provides heated burner output from the direct fired burner 1534 that moves laterally and enters the top of the air blending chamber 1538. The burner output from the direct fired burner may be in the range of 2000 degrees Fahrenheit. The air blending chamber 1538 receives return air from either the reverse return duct 2334 or the forward return duct opening 1550, but in both cases the actual entry of return air from the kiln is through heat modulating damper 1536 (see
Also visible in the pair of drawings of
As noted in the discussion of
Attributes of the improved air blending chamber include:
Those of skill in the art will recognize that while the disclosed designs used all of these features, one could benefit from a portion of the benefits of the present disclosure through use of one or more of these features.
A simplified overview of one way to use the teachings of the present disclosure is as follows. The outlet from the burner enters from the side of the vertically integrated dual return assembly in the dispersion chamber above the extended air blending chamber and air blending chamber rather than directly downward into the top of the air blending chamber as before. The hot burner output gas would be driven rapidly downward by the much larger volume of downward flow of the relatively cooler and denser kiln return air. The downward flow of the burner output gas is delayed by the delay table which keeps the burner output gas up in the dispersion chamber in the lower final portion of the vertically integrated dual return assembly. Notice the inward flow of much cooler fresh air (at ambient temperature of approximately 70 degrees Fahrenheit) through the fresh air inlet below the hot duct discharge from the burner. The fresh air inlet does not generally close fully so there is normally an inflow in the range of 5% of full flow. This relative cool air travels for the most part below the delay table.
The disclosure can be better understood with reference to the following figures. The components in the figures are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the disclosure. Moreover, in the figures, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the different views.
The figures provided in
To promote the mixing of kiln return air and much hotter burner output gas than would occur in an air blending chamber and duct work shown in
As described above, the prior art solution shown in
After the change in direction and a brief downward flow, the kiln return air goes through the heat modulating damper 1536. The heat modulating damper 1536 performs the traditional task of controlling the temperature of heated air in the supply duct 1546 to the kiln by changing the ratio of relatively cool kiln return air (approximately 220 degrees Fahrenheit) and the much hotter burner output gas (approximately 2000 degrees Fahrenheit). The kiln return air is the overwhelming majority of the air flow into the air blending chamber accounting normally for 80 to 90 percent of the air flow with the remainder split between the burner output gas from hot duct 1560 and the cooler fresh air through fresh air damper 1570.
While the prior art introduced the burner output gas into the air blending chamber, the present disclosure moves the entry point of the burner output gas from the hot duct 1560 up into a dispersion chamber 2440 in the downward vertical portion of the vertically integrated dual return assembly 2400 so there is initial mixing of the kiln return air and the burner output gas within the dispersion chamber 2440 before entry into an extended air blending chamber 2438 below the dispersion chamber 2440.
An external indication of the presence of the turning vane 2410 is shown in
Note that in order to present the best possible view of the vertically integrated dual return assembly 2400, the vertically integrated dual return assembly 2400 is not shown after insulation. One of skill in the art will appreciate that duct work containing air and gases heated to well above ambient air temperature would benefit from substantial insulation, perhaps three or more inches thick.
Other components visible is
The burner discharge comes via hot duct 1560 and enters the vertically integrated dual return assembly 2400 horizontally below the heat modulating damper 2436 and above the fresh air damper 1570. The output from the hot duct 1560 may be in the range of 2000 degrees Fahrenheit.
As noted above,
The present disclosure introduces a dispersion chamber 2440 between the heat modulating damper 2436 and the extended air blending chamber 2460. The dispersion chamber 2440 allows for the output from the direct fired burner 1534 (
Another Design.
One difference is that a preferred arrangement for the heat modulating damper 2484 is to have the vanes 2488 running from kiln side (with reverse return duct 2334 and forward return duct 1554) to front side as shown in
Placing the heat modulating damper 2484 of vertically integrated dual return assembly 2480 with a vane orientation of kiln side to front side avoids having the vanes direct the kiln return air to either the kiln side or the burner side of the integrated dual return assembly 2480.
Notice that
Also visible in
Also visible in
The cross section of the isolation damper 2430 does not show the connection of the isolation damper 2430 with pin 2432 which is the axis of rotation for the isolation damper 2430. The isolation damper 2430 can move from the open position shown here to a closed position that caps the hot duct extension 1564 to isolate the burner from the vertically integrated dual return assembly 2480.
An optional horizontal plate (not shown here) may be permanently located above the location of the isolation damper 2430 for the burner outlet when the isolation damper 2430 is in the horizontal open position. This horizontal plate may be useful in prolonging the useful life of the isolation damper 2430 as it will reduce the vibration imposed upon the isolation damper by the downward flow of the kiln return air from the heat modulating damper 2436.
Additional Improvements.
The legs 2674 may be round in cross section or square as shown here. The table legs 2674 may be oriented with a corner facing the oncoming air flow from the fresh air damper 1570.
A cone 2620 is maintained by cross bars to be above the isolation damper 2430 when the isolation damper 2430 is in the horizontal open position. To allow for clear views of other components not previously introduced, the isolation damper 2430 is shown in the closed vertical position covering the hot duct extension 1564. The use of an isolation damper 2430 is known in the art and not central to the understanding of the present disclosure beyond the placement of the cone 2620 to divert the return air coming from the heat modulating damper 2484. More specifically, the return air comes from the kiln 100, then up the upward portion 2496 (
One of skill in the art will recognize that the cone 2620 is perhaps better characterized as a cone shaped protector. The cone shaped protector does not have to have a pointy apex as one would find in a cone defined in a geometry textbook. The top can be flat to make the shape technically frusto-conical as the top flat face would be considered a frustum. The cone shaped protector could be at least partially rounded to resemble a hemisphere. The base of the cone shaped protector would not have to be a pure circle but could be an ellipse, or an octagon or some other multisided geometric shape having at least five sides that approximates a circle.
The mixing of the return air flow from the kiln 100 and the burner output would start in the dispersion chamber 2440 above the top of the delay table 2470. Note that the top of the delay table 2470 is above the lower projection 2692 of the dispersion chamber 2440. Lower projection 2692 is actually part of a heat shield that allows cooler air from the top of the dispersion chamber 2440 to get behind the heat shield and travel downwards towards the top of the blending chamber 2438.
Note that as the top surface of the delay table 2470 is above the lower projection 2692 of the dispersion chamber 2440, the top surface of the delay table 2470 is too high up for burner output to move purely laterally from the top surface of the delay table 2470 directly into the air blending chamber 2438 and then downward into the mixing chamber outlet 2610. It is extremely important that there is not an easy path between the top of the delay table 2470 and the mixing chamber outlet 2610 as the lack of an easy path produces the conditions necessary for the breakup of the intense heat within the burner output. Allowing the burner output from the hot duct 1560 to reach the mixing chamber outlet 2610 without mixing with the significantly cooler air returning from the kiln would be a problem as the output from the burner output from the hot duct 1560 may be in the range of 2000 degrees Fahrenheit which is much too hot for contact with the recirculation blower 1542.
Instead the burner output from the hot duct extension 1564 is pushed downward and outward from the center of the delay table 2470 by the more massive, cooler, denser, kiln return air coming though the heat modulating damper 2484. It is useful to note that the mass of return air coming from the heat modulating damper 2484 is many times the mass of the relatively smaller amount of burner output at about 2000 degrees Fahrenheit coming from the hot duct 1560 to warm the return kiln air from a temperature of about 220 degrees Fahrenheit to a mixing chamber outlet temperature of around 500 degrees Fahrenheit.
As the heated air pours off the perimeter of the delay table 2470, the heated air strikes cool air from the in-leakage of the fresh air damper 1570. Mixing of the three air flows continue as the upper two flows move downward and towards the mixing chamber outlet 2610 while traversing the extended air blending chamber 2460 and the air blending chamber 2438.
Establishing the Improved Design is an Improvement.
A first way to look for evidence of improvement is to model the air flow velocities in the air balancing chamber. Ideally, the flow profiles are similar when the kiln is run in the forward air flow and reverse air flow directions.
The prior art design shown for a dual return as discussed above (See
In order to illustrate this concept, U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/449,527 filed on Jan. 23, 2017 with title Vertically Integrated Dual Return Assembly made extended use of color coded model outputs to indicate visually the areas for the highest flow or the highest temperatures. In order to keep to the preferred format for a non-provisional application, this type of data is now being conveyed by black and white graphs with isolines showing the contours of areas with similar flow rates or temperatures.
Unless otherwise indicated, the legends for interpreting these graphs are as follows:
— —. (Dash, Dash, dot)
— —.. (Dash, Dash, dot, dot)
— —. (Dash, Dash, dot)
— —.. (Dash, Dash, dot, dot)
— —... (Dash, Dash, dot, dot, dot)
Temperature Results for Model of Prior Art Solution.
Moving to the first triplet of figures,
As discussed in connection with
As evident in a comparison of
Likewise, the triplet of figures
The triplet of figures:
The triplet of figures:
Flow Velocity Results for Model of Prior Art Solution.
Temperature Results for Model of Improved Solution.
Before turning to the results, it is useful to note what features were in the model. The changes to the table legs as shown in
As with the prior art model, this model assumes in-leakage across the “closed” fresh air damper 1570 equal to about 5% of the full open flow. The model excluded the impact from the vanes in the dampers at the edge of the reverse return duct 2334 and at the edge of the forward return duct 1554 and simply used boundary conditions to change the source of the return air.
The vanes in the heat modulating damper 2436 were modeled at various levels of open and closed. A closed heat modulating damper 2436 will still allow about 30% of full flow. An open heat modulating damper 2436 will have some small reduction of flow from the drag from the open vanes. The model results show the output when the heat modulating damper 2436 was full open. Although the results were similarly good at various modeled levels of partial closure of the heat modulating damper 2436.
Components of vertically integrated dual return assembly 2600 have been labelled in
A remarkable item to focus upon is the modeled differences between forward flow operation and reverse flow operation temperature gradients have been substantially eliminated. The differences between the temperature model for forward flow in
The next triplet of figures includes
The lack of hot spots in the heated air moving toward the recirculation blower 1542 protects the recirculation blower 1542 and helps keep the treatment of the lumber within the kiln consistent across areas as inconsistent heat entering the recirculation blower 1542 results in inconsistent heat delivered to various distribution vents 250 (
The next triplet of figures begins with
The next triplet of figures begins with
The triplet of figures beginning at
ADVANTAGE 1—the temperature profiles visible in
ADVANTAGE 2—The blending of the hot burner output from the direct fired burner 1534 (not shown here) delivered via hot duct 1560 with the return air from the kiln delivered through heat modulating damper 2484 collide over the surface of the delay table 2470. One can imagine the hot burner output from the hot duct 1560 is present on an anvil surface (delay table 2470) and is stuck by the momentum of the return air from the kiln traveling perpendicular to the surface of the delay table 2470. The hot burner output from hot duct 1560 is dispersed and prevented from forming laminar sheets of hot burner output to travel unmixed to the mixing chamber outlet 2610.
Proof of the superior mixing shows up in the lowest band 1784 of shown temperatures being in the range of 200 to 500 degrees Fahrenheit (isoline — —. . . (Dash, Dash, dot, dot, dot)). Presumably, additional mixing will occur between lowest band 1784 and the mixing chamber outlet 2610 to further homogenize the temperature of the mixed air.
The results of the final temperature results triplet in
Flow Velocity Results for Model of Improved Solution.
The flow model used to provide flow velocities is the same model that provided the temperature profiles discussed in
Triplet figure set with
The return air duct 2494 takes the return from either the reverse return duct 2334 or forward return duct 1554 and routes the return air upward through upward portion 2496 of the return air duct 2494, across the extended horizontal run 2490, and back downward with an assist from turning vane 2410 to exit through the heat modulating damper 2484 into the dispersion chamber 2440 where the return air impacts with and disperses the burner output from the hot duct 1560.
The flow velocities from the model appear essentially the same for either the forward flow model shown in
Triplet figure set with
Triplet figure set with
Triplet figure set with
The final triplet figure set with
Summary of Model Results.
In summary, the operation of the return air duct 2494 virtually eliminates any difference in the model results for temperature profiles or flow velocities profiles between the forward flow operation and reverse flow operation. This lack of differences will reduce the need for control systems to attempt to compensate for differences and will help promote more uniform treatment of the lumber as the temperature of the air entering the kiln through the various distribution vents 250 (
The use of the delay table 2470 to help prevent laminar flow from the burner output coming from the outlet of the hot duct 1560 all the way to the mixing chamber outlet 2610 promotes substantially uniform temperatures of the mixed air as the mixed air reaches the mixing chamber outlet 2610. Avoiding hot spots protects the recirculation blower 1542 and prevents portions of the distribution duct 232 ((
With more substantially uniform blending, the total amount of heat provided to the kiln by the direct fired burner 1534 can be increased without incurring damage to the recirculation blower 1542 or to lumber within the kiln. Providing more heat under controlled circumstances results in faster processing rates for the lumber and thus more throughput for a kiln of a given size.
Details on the Delay Table.
The delay table 2470 needs to be created from a material that will tolerate extended exposure to temperatures of 2000 degrees Fahrenheit or more. The top surface of the delay table 2470 needs to be able to tolerate prolonged exposure to flame of the burner gas without erosion. A suitable material would be refractory material that can withstand thermal shock and has a high concentration of stainless steel needles. The refractory material is high density and low cement. One suitable material is sold by Allied Mineral Products, Inc. under the ARMORMAX® brand as ARMORMAX® 70 SR although those of skill in the art would be able to select other refractory materials that would have suitable durability for exposure to the flame from the burner which may extend into the dispersion chamber and make contact with the top surface of the delay table.
An additional benefit of the substantial refractory mass of the delay table is that the thermal mass of the refractory material in the delay table will tend to stabilize temperature.
For initial testing, the size and shape of the delay table 2470 was based upon the size and shape of the isolation damper 2430. The isolation damper 2430 is a circle with a diameter that is twelve inches wider than the inside diameter of the hot duct extension 1564 conveying the heated output from the burner to the dispersion chamber. While the model is sensitive to the size and shape of the table top, it is possible that some other sizes and shapes will provide satisfactory results. Varying the size, shape, and precise positioning of the delay table 2470 for systems with different ratings of recirculation blower and burner output are within the normal tuning activities of those of skill in the art.
Computational Fluid Dynamics.
Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) modelling is a difficult task. Frequently the models are adjusted after taking physical measurements and comparing those to the model output. This validation work often leads to modifications of the model. The present disclosure uses model results before validation so the specific temperature and flow profiles may be somewhat different from the model results.
The model work was done using Autodesk CFD, Computational Fluid Dynamics Software described at http://www.autodesk.com/products/cfd/overview.
Orientation.
The present disclosure had the flow of the kiln return air going up in the upward portion 2496 of the return air duct 2494, turning and traveling horizontally in the extended horizontal run 2490 and coming downward through the heat modulating damper 2484 into the dispersion chamber 2440 to collide with the output from the hot duct 1560 on the delay table 2470.
As the impact of gravity on air flow is not the driving factor in this suction driven system, one of skill in the art could rotate the design elements suggested by the present disclosure so that the delay table was vertical instead of horizontal and the kiln return air came perpendicular to the vertical surface of the delay table to strike the output from the hot duct.
Likewise, the design could be rotated 180 degrees so that the hot duct output travels on the bottom side of a delay table mounted to the ceiling of the assembly and the return kiln air would come upward perpendicular to the delay table surface to strike the output from the hot duct.
If the design could be rotated 90 degrees and 180 degrees and still function, then one of skill in the art would appreciate that any other rotation from this disclosure would be viable as long as the output from the hot duct is placed upon a delay table surface and struck by the return kiln air traveling substantially perpendicular to the relevant surface of the delay table.
In all cases, the teachings of the present disclosure could be used to eliminate differences between forward flow and reverse flow operation no matter what the final trajectory of the kiln return air is set to be, vertically down, vertically up, horizontal, or some other angle.
One can imagine that the operation or the mounting position of the isolation damper may need to be adjusted for these alternative orientations.
Burner Choices.
The present disclosure discusses the use of the vertically integrated dual return assembly which receives heat from a green fuel gasifier that uses a fuel such as sawdust. Such burners are challenging as they do not have fans to drive burner output gas out of the burner and thus are reactive to the recirculation blower and the heat regulating damper.
Nothing should be interpreted as limiting the use of the vertically integrated dual return assemblies to green fuel gasifier burner assemblies. Other burners with forced drafts could use natural gas, a suspension shaving burner, or some other burner known to those of skill in the art.
Batch Kilns.
The operation of a batch kiln is very much like the operation of a main dryer section except that the thermal treatment starts after carriages loaded with lumber, spacers, and weights are placed in the batch kiln and the carriages are not moved until after the completion of the thermal processing of the lumber, when the carriages are cool enough to be moved and the treated lumber unloaded from the carriages. As batch kilns do not have moving carriages during the heating process, there is not a need for energy recover sections to move heat from heated lumber to green lumber. Thus a batch kiln does not need to have a pair of pathways for carriages. There may be only one carriage pathway, two carriage pathways, or more than two carriage pathways.
As batch kilns operate with a sequence of fan cycles with heated air circulated by bidirectional fans in a forward direction and fan cycles with heated air circulated by bidirectional fans in a reverse direction, the teaching of the present disclosure apply equally to batch kilns as the do to continuous drying kiln (CDK) designs.
Differences in Supply.
One of skill in the art will appreciate that the recirculation blower 1542 could be placed after duct work rather than directly on the outlet of the air blending chamber 1538 and that the distribution of heated air to the structure may deviate from that described in
Differences in Fan Layout.
One of skill in the art will appreciate that one could create forward and reverse air flows using bidirectional fans, two sets of unidirectional fans, unidirectional fans that are rotated from a first orientation to a second orientation, or any other plan to get circulation in the forward and reverse directions while still enjoying the benefits of in-kiln second return air ducts as taught with this disclosure.
One of skill in the art will recognize that some of the alternative implementations set forth above are not universally mutually exclusive and that in some cases additional implementations can be created that employ aspects of two or more of the variations described above. Likewise, the present disclosure is not limited to the specific examples or particular embodiments provided to promote understanding of the various teachings of the present disclosure. Other systems, methods, features and advantages of the disclosed teachings will be or will become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following figures and detailed description. Moreover, the scope of the claims which follow covers the range of variations, modifications, and substitutes for the components described herein as would be known to those of skill in the art.
This application builds upon and incorporates in its entirety and U.S. Pat. No. 9,423,176 issued Aug. 23, 2016 for System for Balancing Lumber Kiln Return Air. This application claims the benefit of co-pending U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/449,527 filed on Jan. 23, 2017 with title Vertically Integrated Dual Return Assembly. The '527 application including the appendices are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62449527 | Jan 2017 | US |