1. Field of the Invention
The subject invention generally pertains to vertically movable doors and more specifically to a door that is particularly suitable for use at a truck loading dock or other location where ventilation, safety or security may be important.
2. Description of Related Art
Many buildings may have a doorway with a loading dock to facilitate transferring cargo between a truck and the building. A loading dock is a platform that is generally at the same elevation as the bed of the truck or its trailer. The dock may also include a dock leveler, which is a vertically movable ramp that compensates for a height differential that may exist between the platform and the truck bed. Dock levelers may also provide a bridge across which personnel and material handling equipment can travel between the platform and the truck.
For protection against weather and theft, the doorway of the building may include a manual or power operated door. Doors for loading docks usually open and close by moving vertically so as not to interfere with the rear of the truck or interfere with cargo and activity just inside the doorway.
When there is no truck at the dock and the weather is mild, the door may be left open to help ventilate the building with fresh outside air. Leaving the door open, however, reduces the building's security and increases the risk of personnel or items inside the building from accidentally falling off the edge of the dock's platform and through the open doorway to the driveway. But even with the door closed, heavy material handling equipment, such a forklift truck, may have enough power or momentum to accidentally break through the door and still fall off the edge.
Barriers of various types are used in a loading dock environment to prevent the accidental run-off noted above. In fact, some loading dock levelers feature extended lips that can provide a run-off barrier when the leveler is in an inoperative position, but these barrier-style levelers do not protect the loading dock door from impact when the door is closed because the extended lip is outside of the door. Examples of barrier-style dock levelers can be seen in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,920,598 and 5,040,258. Other barriers, such as a simple safety gate better protect the loading dock door, but they are typically manually activated or require a separate operational step to position the barrier. Examples of a gate-type barrier are the Rite-Hite Dok Guardian product and the inventions disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,459,963 and 5,564,238.
A variety of other patents are directed to loading dock door systems. U.S. Pat. No. 5,408,789, for example, discloses a unique loading dock door system that automatically places a barrier to both prevent run-off and protect the door, itself, from impact. The patented system may not only include what appears to be a conventional vertically moving door, but also an additional screen door for ventilation and security. For run-off protection and to protect the screen door from impact, a safety barrier (which appears to be a rigid bar) is attached to the screen door. A system of this type, in which the barrier is automatically placed when the door is closed, provides the additional convenience of not requiring an operator to perform an additional operation (in the case of a manually positioned barrier) or an additional driving mechanism (in the case of an automatically positioned barrier) to position the barrier. Further, the system ensures that the barrier is always in place when the door is closed, thus ensuring protection of the door from impact damage. However, because the barrier travels with the door, it is also removed when the door is opened, leaving no run-off protection. Further, the system actually includes two doors with two sets of tracks, which is likely more expensive than a single door. The two doors also take up more floor space in a loading dock area where floor space is often limited. The rigid bar disclosed in this system would also be subject to permanent deformation when impacted by a fork truck or similar conveyance.
In another attempt to provide ventilation to a sectional door, the system disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,092,580, includes a screened gate that can be selectively attached or removed from the lowermost panel of a garage door. Because the screened gate is not part of the garage door itself, it does not have its own rollers for traveling along the door's tracks. Instead, the gate is either attached to the frame of the doorway using Velcro strips (
First, an industrial barrier for impeding forklifts at a loading dock generally needs to be relatively strong, particularly at floor level where the forklifts travel. With the '580 system, however, the screen, which appears to be one of the weaker members of the door, is placed at the very bottom of the door to serve as a barrier, while the more solid door panels are higher up.
Second, vertically moving sectional doors (e.g., garage doors) typically have a spring-loaded system for counterbalancing the weight of the door panels, thereby making the door easier to operate. Adding or removing weight from the door by selectively attaching or disconnecting a panel can change the weight equilibrium of the door. Depending on whether weight is added or removed, the door may have a strong bias to open or close. This may not be a problem for the '580 system, because the screened gate appears to be relatively lightweight, but a much heavier panel is needed to stop a forklift. Adding or removing the weight of a heavy, truck-stopping panel from an industrial door may cause the door to fling open or close abruptly.
In some embodiments, a vertically moving door includes a separable horizontal joint that enables the door to selectively move to a closed position, a barrier position and an open position.
In some embodiments, the separable horizontal joint, when intact, provides a pivotal connection between an upper and lower section of the door.
In some embodiments, the separable horizontal joint creates a ventilation area between the upper and lower sections of the door, and for security or for providing a barrier to insects, a screen or a lattice of straps extends across the ventilation area.
In some embodiments, a counterbalance, such as a spring or deadweight, helps compensate for the weight change caused by separating or reconnecting the lower section of the door to the upper section.
In some embodiments, a winch, hoist or chainfall helps separate and/or reconnect the upper and lower door sections in a controlled manner.
In some embodiments, a mechanically actuated latch at the horizontal joint helps hold the upper and lower sections of the door together.
In some embodiments, an electrically actuated latch at the horizontal joint helps hold the upper and lower sections of the door together.
In some embodiments, a latch helps hold the lower section of the door down when the upper section is raised for ventilation.
In some embodiments, a resilient, shock-absorbing barrier is attached to a vertically moving door.
In some embodiments, a strap held in tension serves as the resilient, shock-absorbing barrier.
In some embodiments, an existing conventional door is modified as a horizontally split door.
In some embodiments, an existing conventional door is modified to include a resilient, shock-absorbing barrier.
To provide security and safety when lower section 14 is at its fully lowered position and no truck is present while simultaneously allowing the benefit of fresh air ventilation, door 10 can be moved to a barrier position, as shown in
Moreover, with lower section 14 at its fully lowered position, section 14 serves as a barrier that helps prevent material handling equipment, personnel or items on the dock platform from accidentally falling through the doorway and onto the driveway and further provides a level of security that helps prevent intruders from entering the building. Lower section 14 can serve as a barrier in itself without the need for additional impact-absorbing structure because lower section 14 is part of the door that is already engaged within a set of tracks 52. Moreover, lower section 14 is preferably tougher and more resilient than upper section 12 so that lower section 14 can provide an effective impact-resistant barrier (as seen in U.S. Pat. No. 6,655,442).
Accordingly, closing of the door 10 automatically places a barrier (lower panel 14) in a position to prevent runoff of personnel or equipment. The door can then be partially opened while leaving the barrier in place by separating the disconnectable joint 20 and raising the upper section(s) 12. The benefit of automatically placing a run-off barrier, leaving the barrier in place, and at least partially opening the door, is thus obtained.
For greater security or to prevent insects from passing through ventilation area 22, a lattice of pliable straps 24 (
Straps 24 and screen 26 may also serve as a separation-limiting member. Door 10, for example, may have a counterbalance 28 for offsetting the combined weight of the upper and lower sections 12 and 14, whereby counterbalance 28 reduces the lifting force needed to open the door. Counterbalance 28 could be a counterweight or a torsion spring 30 acting upon one or more take-up drums 32, wherein a cable 34 (elongate member) on the drums connects to a lowermost panel 36 of upper section 12 (
Referring back to
Another method of compensating for the weight differential caused by separation of the door, and for preventing counterbalance 28 from overpowering the lifting of upper section 12 when the weight of lower section 14 is removed, is to include a deadweight (not shown) that can be automatically or manually added to upper section 12 when the lower section is not being lifted and automatically or manually removed when the upper and lower sections are lifted together. Alternatively, a cable 70 (second elongate member) connected to lower section 14 and supported by a roller 72 can suspend a deadweight 74 to offset the weight of lower section 14 (i.e., deadweight 74 and lower section 14 weigh approximately the same). In this way, connecting or disconnecting lower section 14 from upper section 12 makes a negligible difference to the overall weight that counterbalance 28 needs to offset. Thus, counterbalance 28 can be adjusted to carry just the weight of upper section 12 alone.
Installing a winch 76 between sections 12 and 14, as shown in
Referring to
In another embodiment demonstrating weight compensation, shown in
In another embodiment with structure performing the weight compensation function, shown in
To separate sections 12 and 14, deadweight 190 can be slid from wall-mounted rack 192 to door-mounted rack 194, as shown in the left side of
At certain times (e.g., during bad weather) it may be desirable for the ventilation area to be closed and for the door to be used as a typical sectional door. To close ventilation area 22, sections 12 and 14 are brought together, and a latch or latch assembly 42 keeps them engaged as the door opens and closes. For the embodiment of
In some embodiments, track followers 15 (e.g., rollers, tabs, etc.) travel within track 52 to help guide the movement of door 10. Upper track followers 15a extending from door section 12 and a lower track followers 15b extending from lower door section 14 help guide the translation of sections 12 and 14 respectively For the right side of the door, the upper and lower track followers share the same track, and the same is true for the left side of the door.
It should be noted, however, that the present invention is not limited to vertically moving doors with pivotally interconnected panels that stow horizontally overhead. In the open position, the upper and lower door sections may lie in a generally vertical plane or at some angle between horizontal and vertical, as indicated by angle 54 of
In some embodiments, a latch 42′ may engage automatically upon the upper and lower sections 12 and 14 coming together. Latch 42′, for example, may comprise a spring-loaded pivotal arm 56 that selectively engages a catch member 58. Arm 56 can be attached to lower section 14, and catch member 58 can be attached to upper section 12, or the mounting positions of arm 56 and member 58 can be reversed. Arm 56 and/or catch member 58 has a tapered cam surface that when the arm 56 and catch member 58 come together, the cam surface pushes arm 56 away so that the arm can reach out and over catch member 58 to automatically latch onto member 58. Latch 42′ can be disengaged by manually pushing a lower end 60 of arm 56 against the urging of a compression spring 62, or a similar latch 42″ can be electrically engaged and/or disengaged by way of an electromechanical actuator, such as a solenoid 64, as shown in
To connect the door's upper section 12 to its lower section 14, as shown in
Additional embodiments will now be described with reference to
Connecting bar 148 may advantageously reach beyond the width of the door so that actuator 146 can be installed at a generally fixed location, such as against the wall or track 52. This allows selective energizing of actuator 146 without having to run extra electrical wiring to the moving part of the door. Bar 148 can be connected to two or more latch assemblies, as shown, so that multiple latch assemblies can be actuated simultaneously. Bar 148 or a similar connecting member (e.g., linkage, cable, chain, etc.) can also be applied to various other latch systems including, but not limited to those shown in
Door 10 may also include a holding device 65 that helps hold lower section 14 down when door 10 is at its closed or barrier position. Holding device 65 is similar to latch 42′ in that device 65 also comprises a spring-loaded arm 66 that selectively engages a catch member 68, wherein a tapered cam surface is disposed on arm 66 and/or member 68 to enable their automatic engagement with each other.
The doors of
Referring to
To this end, some embodiments of barrier 112 comprise a resilient member 114, such as a nylon strap, bar, cable, chain, etc., that may optionally be held in tension between two opposite ends 116, which in turn are attached to lower section 108. Because barrier 112 is intended to stop a fork truck, an interaction that causes significant (but non-permanent) deformation of resilient member 114, resilient member 114 must be spaced apart from lower section 108 to allow resilient member 114 to yield from the impact, but ultimately stop the fork truck before its wheels reach the end of the leveler or other drop-off point. To reduce forces of impact against lower section 108, each end 116 may comprise a metal bracket 118 that can engage a stationary abutment 120 when door 110 is closed (
In a similar embodiment, shown in
The embodiment of
Another embodiment similar to that of
Door 110 can be made as a new door, or it can be the result of retrofitting an existing door, as illustrated in
Although the invention is described with reference to preferred embodiments, it should be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that various modifications are well within the scope of the invention.
This patent arises from a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/012,424, filed Dec. 14, 2004, which is hereby incorporated herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1357106 | McLellan | Oct 1920 | A |
1652186 | Strauss | Dec 1927 | A |
1666508 | Sawyer | Apr 1928 | A |
2072092 | Blodgett | Mar 1937 | A |
2088046 | White | Jul 1937 | A |
2113587 | Gorar | Apr 1938 | A |
2118942 | Prescott | May 1938 | A |
2154421 | Cunningham | Apr 1939 | A |
2237106 | Minert | Apr 1941 | A |
2295205 | Fraser | Sep 1942 | A |
2378004 | Duell | Jun 1945 | A |
2689004 | Van Der Horst | Sep 1954 | A |
3021896 | Buono et al. | Feb 1962 | A |
3103967 | Gaschen | Sep 1963 | A |
3292685 | Clark | Dec 1966 | A |
3841661 | Ehrlich | Oct 1974 | A |
4356668 | Wagner | Nov 1982 | A |
4378043 | Sorenson | Mar 1983 | A |
4429729 | Winslow | Feb 1984 | A |
4524814 | Deziel | Jun 1985 | A |
4532973 | DeFalco | Aug 1985 | A |
4653566 | Miale | Mar 1987 | A |
4738296 | Hatch | Apr 1988 | A |
4920598 | Hahn | May 1990 | A |
4924932 | Esnault | May 1990 | A |
5005827 | Steinbrecher | Apr 1991 | A |
5029819 | Kane | Jul 1991 | A |
5040258 | Hahn et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5046544 | Coluccio | Sep 1991 | A |
5050846 | Goodman et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5118056 | Jeanise | Jun 1992 | A |
5170829 | Duncan et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5408789 | Plfeger | Apr 1995 | A |
5459963 | Alexander | Oct 1995 | A |
5503211 | Engi | Apr 1996 | A |
5505244 | Thumann | Apr 1996 | A |
5564238 | Ellis | Oct 1996 | A |
5584333 | Torchetti et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5611382 | Sferra | Mar 1997 | A |
5624203 | Jackson et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5636679 | Miller et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5649396 | Carr | Jul 1997 | A |
5660144 | Venti | Aug 1997 | A |
5727614 | Lichy | Mar 1998 | A |
5823705 | Jackson et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5846127 | Kile | Dec 1998 | A |
5848630 | Manzo | Dec 1998 | A |
5860465 | Eastridge et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5904199 | Messner | May 1999 | A |
5927368 | Rohrer et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6041846 | Langlois | Mar 2000 | A |
6092580 | Lucas | Jul 2000 | A |
6186274 | Reynolds et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6260601 | Thomas | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6279276 | Knoll | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283427 | Moller et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6315027 | Lichy | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6371189 | Azoulai | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375164 | Siegler et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375165 | Sherratt et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6485225 | Baker | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6536502 | Britto et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6557614 | Lampers | May 2003 | B1 |
6575435 | Kotzen | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6595496 | Langlie | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6615898 | Schulte | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6655442 | Snyder | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6688480 | Denny | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6733204 | Paniccia | May 2004 | B1 |
6776398 | Tsai | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6807999 | Bowen et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
7509990 | Milligan | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7726378 | Savon | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7775252 | Snyder et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
20030016996 | Gelfand et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030079845 | Stern, Jr. | May 2003 | A1 |
20050072074 | Moore | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060124252 | Miller et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
State Intellectual Property Office, P.R. China, “Second Office Action,” English Translation, issued in connection with Chinese application serial No. 200580042845.6, issued Mar. 9, 2011, 6 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/012,424, mailed Jul. 13, 2010, 11 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/012,424, mailed Jun. 10, 2010, 9 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/012,424, mailed Nov. 25, 2009, 5 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/012,424, mailed Jul. 22, 2009, 13 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/012,424, mailed Jun. 2, 2008, 18 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Restriction Requirement,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/012,424, mailed Feb. 25, 2008, 5 pages. |
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report,” issued in connection with international application serial No. PCT/US05/45279, mailed Jun. 17, 2008, 2 pages. |
International Searching Authority, “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority,” issued in connection with international application serial No. PCT/US05/45279, mailed Jun. 17, 2008, 4 pages. |
International Bureau, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” issued in connection with international application serial No. PCT/US05/45279, mailed Mar. 12, 2009, 5 pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office, P.R. China, “First Office Action,” with English translation, issued in connection with Chinese application serial No. 200580042845.6, issued Mar. 18, 2010, 13 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Supplemental Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/339,152, mailed May 18, 2010, 4 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/339,152, mailed Oct. 6, 2009, 21 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/339,152, mailed Jan. 5, 2009, 21 pages. |
Gaylord Material Handling, Inc., “Dock Strap,” web page advertising DockStrap™ product, dated May 14, 2002, 1 page. |
Engination LLC, “Rite-Hite Aftermarket Meeting,” Engination Product Brochure, dated Jul. 9, 2003, 8 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/339,152, mailed Apr. 7, 2010, 12 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Supplemental Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/339,152, mailed Dec. 24, 2009, 7 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/339,152, mailed Oct. 1, 2008, 7 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Interview Summary,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/339,152, mailed Jan. 20, 2010, 3 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Restriction Requirement,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/339,152, mailed Oct. 1, 2008, 7 pages. |
Chinese Patent Office, “Decision on Rejection,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 200580042845.6, mailed on Feb. 28, 2012, 6 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110000626 A1 | Jan 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11012424 | Dec 2004 | US |
Child | 12883881 | US |