Patent Application
20190287721
The present invention relates to a very high capacitance film capacitor, as well as a method for manufacturing such a capacitor.
A film capacitor consists of two structures which are generally metallic, charge-bearing and separated by a dielectric insulator. This insulator is in the form of at least one film, generally a self-supporting polymer film, which is characterized by an average thickness [ef] with 0.05 μm<ef<50 μm typically, and a relative dielectric permittivity [εf] where εf>1.
Since the capacitance of a film capacitor is proportional to εf and inversely proportional to ef, a very high capacitance film capacitor (hereinafter abbreviated “VHCFC”) can be obtained by using a dielectric insulator of small thickness (ef<<10 μm, the sign “<<” meaning “lower or even much lower than”) and high relative dielectric permittivity (εf>>10, the sign “>>” meaning “higher or even much greater than”).
The roughness of this film and/or the configuration of the stack described above mean(s) that, in most cases, areas filled with air may be present. Their thickness however remains small compared to ef (≤1 μm and ≤10% ef typically).
This phenomenon is known and utilized in the case of impregnated capacitors where the air is then replaced by an impregnant, generally a dielectric liquid of relative dielectric permittivity [εi] close to εf (|εf−εi|≤2 typically). In the case of non-impregnated capacitors (called “dry capacitors”), the air of relative dielectric permittivity [εair] substantially equal to 1, is then locally in series with the main dielectric insulator. Because of the effective thickness of the areas containing the air, this presence in the stack has little influence on the operation of the capacitor when εf<<10. But this is no longer the case in a VHCFC where εf>>10.
More generally, when the operating gradient becomes high (≥50 V/μm), the presence of these areas where the dielectric characteristics are different and generally lower compared to those of the main insulator, may cause partial discharges or unwanted breakdowns, damaging to the capacitor or, at a minimum, to its performance (isolation resistance and leakage current typically). And this is all the more true that εf is high.
In addition, the most common electrical energy storage devices are capacitors, supercapacitors and batteries.
The capacitors are of several types (film, ceramic, electrochemical types, etc.) but store all the energy by capacitive effect: the stored charge [Q] is proportional to the capacitance [C] of the storage device and to the voltage [U] at the terminals of this device, so that Q=C×U.
Even if the voltage can be very high (U>>1000 V), the capacitance is very low (C<<1 F) and the amount of charges stored is therefore also low (Q<<10−3 Ah). However, the response time [τ] is very fast (τ<<10−3 s), which allows the capacitor to respond to power peaks.
The capacitor is therefore rarely used as an energy storage device, or only when the amount of energy involved is very low and/or the requested power is high (such as for example the flash of a lamp).
Supercapacitors are electrochemical devices that store energy mainly by capacitive effect.
Due to their electrochemical nature, the voltage is low (U<<10V). However, due to their structure, the capacitance is very high (C>>1 F) and the response time is fast (τ≈1 s).
The supercapacitor is therefore used to store an amount of energy or of average charges (Q≈1 Ah) to be used over a short time (a few tens of seconds) or under high powers (such as the starting of an engine for example).
The batteries are electrochemical devices that store the energy mainly by electrochemical reaction: the stored charge is proportional to the amount of reacting material.
Due to their electrochemical nature, the voltage is low (U<<10 V) and the response time is slow (τ>>1 s), but the amount of charges stored can be very high (Q>>10 Ah).
The battery is therefore used to store a large amount of energy (a few thousand Ah) to be used over a medium to long time (a few hours) and with moderate power calls (such as the operation of an engine for example).
Since capacitors and supercapacitors involve only charge movements, they have short response times, a symmetrical charge and discharge behavior, and a high ability to repeat cycles (more than several million cycles typically).
This is not the case for batteries where the charges move but especially participate in an electrochemical reaction. The latter limits the response time, causes asymmetry in the charging and discharging behavior, and greatly reduces the ability to repeat cycles (less than a few thousand cycles typically).
Very high capacitance film capacitors, based on dielectric films with very high relative dielectric permittivity [εf] (εf≥10), provide a technological breakthrough. They present the advantages of each of the above-mentioned electrical energy storage technologies (high voltage, fast response time, high amount of charges, strong ability to repeat cycles), without their disadvantages.
They constitute in themselves a new class of devices that can replace each of the conventional electrical energy storage devices. Especially, it is possible to adapt the values of εf and εf to the field of application. For example, in the case of a typical battery application, a very high surface capacitance will be sought, using a small thickness (εf≤2 μm) and a very high relative dielectric permittivity (εf≥2000). In this case, the device will have a reasonable surface, in agreement with the powers requested by the application (there is, for a given technology, a power/surface limit beyond which the technology is no longer viable, largely for thermal reasons).
In the case of a typical supercapacitor application, where the requested powers are significantly higher while the energy requested is lower, it will be necessary to work with larger surfaces. This requires therefore the use of a dielectric film of greater thickness (1 μm≤ef≤5 μm) or of lower relative dielectric permittivity (100≤εf≤2000).
In the case of a typical capacitor application, where energy is not a criterion but where the operating voltage is often high, it will be possible to work with a dielectric film of high thickness (ef≥5 μm) and low relative dielectric permittivity (10≤εf≤100) while gaining more surface compared to conventionally used dielectric materials.
The design of the film capacitors as described above is not suitable for very high capacitance film capacitors [VHCFC] using dielectric films which have very high relative dielectric permittivity [εf] (εf≥10), whether in a dry or impregnated configuration.
In both cases, the unavoidable existence of areas having dielectric characteristics much lower than those of the main dielectric film prevents the correct operation of the capacitor, especially:
The present invention aims to provide a solution to these problems.
A first object of the present invention therefore relates to a very high capacitance film capacitor using at least one dielectric insulator of relative permittivity εf≥10 and in which the possible presence of areas where the relative dielectric permittivity is locally much lower than εf does not lead to degradation of the performance of the capacitor.
Thus, a first aspect of the invention relates to a very high capacitance film capacitor which includes a dielectric layer consisting of at least one dielectric film, each dielectric film of this dielectric layer having the following parameters:
parameters in which “f” means “film” and i≥1, “i” designating the “ith” dielectric film of said dielectric layer,
this dielectric layer separating a first electronic charge-bearing structure from a second electronic charge-bearing structure, these two structures having an opposite surface S separated by the dielectric layer,
characterized by the fact that:
A/ the interface between the dielectric layer and the first structure meets the following requirements:
εpjEpj≥Min(εfiEfi)
where “p” means “thickness of parasitic dielectrics” and “j” refers to the “jth” thickness, with 1≤j≤N,
B/ the interface between the dielectric layer and the second structure meets the following requirements:
εpkEpk≥Min(εfkEfk)
where “p” means “thickness of parasitic dielectrics” and “k” refers to the “kth” thickness, with 1≤k≤M,
with the following additional condition:
C/ when said dielectric layer consists of more than one dielectric film, then any interface Σ between two dielectric films satisfies the following conditions:
εplEpl≥Min(εfiEfi)
where “p” means “thickness of parasitic dielectrics” and “l” refers to the “lth” thickness, with 1≤l≤PΣ, said dielectric layer being made of polymer material or based on polymer material, excluding an exclusively mineral material.
According to a preferred embodiment of this capacitor, said dielectric layer is not self-supporting.
Another aspect of the invention relates to a method for manufacturing a film capacitor according to the above characteristic, characterized by the fact that it has the following successive steps:
a) using a second dielectric layer called “support layer”, of relative dielectric permittivity [εf′] and of thickness [ef′], which is metallized on at least one of its both opposite sides, and of dielectric strength [Ef′],
b) depositing said dielectric layer on said support layer so that it is in contact with a metallized side of this support layer,
c) proceeding to the metallization of the side of said dielectric layer which remains free at the end of step b),
d) proceeding to the coiling on itself of the set resulting from step c) or to the stacking of several sets resulting from step c),
said dielectric layer and support layer satisfying the following relation:
ef′ Ef′≥ef Ef, wherein the expressions ef and Ef are defined in claim 1.
According to other advantageous and non-limiting characteristics of this method:
a) depositing said dielectric layer on a support film consisting of a metal strip;
b) depositing the set resulting from step a) on a dielectric support layer;
c) depositing the set resulting from step b) on a second support film consisting of a metal strip;
d) proceeding to the coiling on itself of the set resulting from step c) or to the stacking of several sets resulting from step c);
a) removal of material from said strip, such that the remaining material constitutes said fuses, which removal is carried out by a technique such as spraying of the metal, punching or mechanical drilling of the metal, dissolution or chemical etching of the metal;
b) addition of material to said strip, so that the added material constitutes said fuses, which addition is carried out by a technique such as welding, brazing, clinching or stamping.
Other characteristics and advantages of the invention will appear upon reading the following description of a preferred embodiment of the invention. This description is made with reference to the appended drawings in which:
Finally,
In the present application and unless otherwise mentioned, the following definitions will be valid.
It is meant by “all-film capacitor” a film capacitor in which the electronic charge-bearing structures (hereinafter abbreviated “ECBS”) are independent metal sheets of the dielectric layer. The metal sheets are typically made of aluminum or copper, or any other metal or metal alloy that can be formed into a sheet of a thickness less than or equal to 100 μm typically.
It is meant by “metallized film capacitor” a film capacitor in which the ECBS are metal layers deposited on at least one side of the dielectric layer. The metal deposition consists especially of aluminum, zinc, copper, silver, gold, platinum, chromium, alloy of two or more of these metals, successively deposited layers of these metals or metal alloys typically, or any other metal, metal alloy or succession of metal layers can be deposited according to a conventional metallization technique, such as vacuum evaporation, physicochemical vacuum deposition or the same.
One of the major advantages of the “metallized film” technology is the possibility of self-regeneration of the capacitor in the presence of a defect. Thus, when a defect becomes critical, the capacitor goes into “breakdown”, that is to say an internal short-circuit is created via the defect between the two ECBSs. The capacitor is then no longer functional. The very localized power released by the short-circuit (which generally takes the form of a micro electric arc) induces a demetallization by thermal spraying of the two ECBSs around the defect. The distance of establishment of the short-circuit therefore increases as demetallization progresses. At a certain moment (which depends on a large number of parameters including the nature and the thickness of the metallized layer, the nature and the thickness of the dielectric layer, the “AC” (alternating current) or “DC” (direct current) nature and the value of the operating voltage, the coiling pressure, etc.), the distance of establishment becomes too great for the short-circuit to be maintained.
The breakdown stops and the capacitor becomes functional again: it is “regenerated”. This phenomenon is practically impossible in an all-film capacitor because the thickness of the ECBSs is too great compared to the available local power for there to be a sufficient demetallization around the defect. Moreover, this phenomenon has nothing systematic in a metallized film capacitor: the power released by the short-circuit does not only demetallize the ECBSs around the defect, it also heats the capacitor volume around the defect. This rise in temperature can trigger a thermal avalanche phenomenon by collapsing of the dielectric (including mainly dielectric strength) and thermomechanical (it is possible to go up to the fusion) properties of the materials comprised in the impacted volume. The defect is then “diffused” gradually through the capacitor whose total energy becomes insufficient to regenerate the defect.
The term “extrusion” refers to any thermomechanical method that makes it possible to transform a plastic material in the mechanical sense into a self-supporting film or not, via a technique of compression, passage through a die, and optionally stretching and/or crosslinking and/or deposition on a substrate.
The term “coating” refers to any method for depositing a fluid film on a substrate, generally followed by drying and optionally crosslinking, in order to obtain a self-supporting film or not.
It is meant by “coiled capacitor” any film capacitor obtained by coiling of an “ECBS 1/Dielectric layer 1/ECBS 2/Dielectric layer 2” structure on itself. It should be noted that the dielectric layers 1 and 2 may actually consist of several separate dielectric films coiled in parallel. “ECBS 1” and “ECBS 2” then constitute the two electrically insulated poles of the capacitor.
It is meant by “stacked capacitor” any film capacitor obtained by a stack of an “ECBS 1/Dielectric layer 1/ECBS 2/Dielectric layer 2” structure on itself. It should be noted that the dielectric layers 1 and 2 may actually consist of several separate dielectric films stacked on top of each other. “ECBS 1” and “ECBS 2” then constitute the two electrically insulated poles of the capacitor.
These two last designations are extended to the concept of “multitrack capacitor” (coiled or stacked) for which one or more intermediate ECBSs, insulated from each other as well as from ECBS 1 and ECBS 2, and coplanar with ECBS 1 or ECBS 2, are introduced into the structure so that each intermediate ECBS belongs to two capacitors and provides gradually the series connection of all the capacitors formed accordingly between the main poles ECBS 1 and ECBS 2.
The advantage of a multitrack structure is to optimize the series connection of capacitors within the same coiled or stacked structure and therefore, without having to add additional conditioning or connectivity means.
It will be noted that in the case where there is an odd number of intermediate ECBS, ECBS 1 and ECBS 2 become coplanar insofar as they refer to the two poles of the multitrack capacitor.
Finally, in a coiled capacitor, there are several means for controlling the coiling pressure in order to ensure good plating of the films coiled on each other.
The first one is to use a pressure roller that presses with a constant pressure on the coil at the location of the coiling. This pressure is equal to the coiling pressure and is constant over the entire winding.
The second one is to control the coiling pressure of each coiled film by the coiling tension (via the tensile force exerted on the film) and the coiling angle (also called “tension angle”). The coiling pressure is then related to the mechanical characteristics of each coiled film, as well as to the coiling radius, and therefore varies not only from one coiled film to the other, but also through the winding.
Throughout the present application, including claims, the dielectric layer is made of a polymer material or based on polymer material (i.e., consisting of a polymer matrix containing inclusions of an organic and/or mineral nature). In any case, the use of exclusively mineral materials is excluded.
Examples of materials constituting this dielectric layer are given in documents US-A-2016/0254092 and WO A 2016/073522.
Advantageously, the “parasitic” dielectrics are of gaseous (such as air, a neutral gas, etc.), liquid (such as mineral or organic oil, water, etc.) or solid (such as a polymer, mineral dusts, organic material such as grease, etc.) nature.
A first object of the present invention is a very high capacitance film capacitor [VHCFC].
An example of such a VHCFC 1 is represented in the appended
This capacitor 1 is formed of at least one dielectric film 100, also called “layer” (in this case, a single film 100a is represented here), which separates a first charge-bearing structure 200 (abbreviated ECBS), from a second charge-bearing structure 300.
In the figures, the ECBSs 200 and 300 have been represented in such a way that they are not completely facing each other. This constitutes an exaggerated representation of what is happening in reality. Indeed, even if there is generally an offset to avoid metallization edge electric arcs, this offset is much smaller than the one represented.
Ideally, the interface areas between the dielectric film 100a and the two ECBSs are devoid of any imperfection, so that their adhesion is perfect.
But this is only a theoretical case.
In practice and as illustrated in
Referring now to
Thus, the area Z1 is located at the interface between the film 100a and the upper ECBS 200.
It shows a first thickness of parasitic dielectrics 400a interposed between a protrusion on the surface of the ECBS 200 and a recess on the surface of the film 100a.
It also distinguishes, but at another location, two successive thicknesses 400b and 400c at the interface.
As for the area Z2, it is located at the interface between the film 100a and the lower ECBS 300.
It shows a first thickness of parasitic dielectrics 500a interposed between a protrusion on the surface of the film 100a and a recess on the surface of the ECBS 300.
It also distinguishes, but at another location, two successive thicknesses 500b and 500c at the interface.
These are of course very simplified artist views given by way of illustration. Neither the geometry (width, thickness, shape, etc.), nor the position at the interface, nor the constitution (one or two thickness/thicknesses of parasitic dielectrics) are representative of reality.
These thicknesses may consist of air and/or foreign bodies that may have adverse impact on the parameters of the VHCFC constituted accordingly.
However, the present applicant has pointed out that it is possible to obtain a quality VHCFC as far as the dielectric film 100a has the following parameters:
A/ the interface between the dielectric film 100a and the first structure 200 meets the following requirements:
εpjEpj≥εE
where “p” means “thickness of parasitic dielectrics” and “j” refers to the “jth” thickness, with 1≤j≤N,
B/ the interface between the dielectric film 100 and the second structure 300 meets the following requirements:
εpkEpk≥εE
where “p” means “thickness of parasitic dielectrics” and “k” refers to the “kth” thickness, with 1≤k≤M.
But in many cases, the dielectric film 100a is not unique and a dielectric layer consisting of a superposition of several films 100a, 100b, . . . , 100i is then involved.
In the case above, only two films 100a and 100b are present. But what has just been specified is also valid when more than two films, including for all the interface areas between two films, are involved.
In practice and as illustrated in
Referring now to
Areas Z1 and Z2 are similar to areas Z1 and Z2 described above with reference to
As for the area Z3, it is located at the interface between the films 100a and 100b of the layer 100.
It shows a first thickness of parasitic dielectrics 600a interposed between a protrusion on the surface of the film 100a and a recess on the surface of the film 100b.
It also distinguishes, but in another location, two successive thicknesses 600b and 600c at the interface.
These are again very simplified artist views given by way of illustration. Neither the geometry (width, thickness, shape, etc.), nor the position at the interface, nor the constitution (one or two thicknesses of parasitic dielectrics) are representative of reality.
Also in this case, the present applicant has highlighted the fact that it is possible to obtain a quality VHCFC, this very high capacitance film capacitor 1 including a dielectric layer 100 consisting of at least one dielectric film 100a, each dielectric film 100i of this dielectric layer 100 having the following parameters:
parameters in which “f” means “film” and i≥1, “i” designating the “ith” dielectric film 100i of said dielectric layer 100,
this dielectric layer 100 separating a first ECBS 200 from a second ECBS 300, these two structures having an opposite surface S separated by the dielectric layer 100,
since:
A/ the interface between the dielectric layer 100 and the first structure 200 meets the following requirements:
εpjEpj≥Min(εfiEfi)
where “p” means “thickness of parasitic dielectrics” and “j” refers to the “jth” thickness, with 1≤j≤N,
B/ the interface between the dielectric layer 100 and the second structure 300 meets the following requirements:
εpkEpk≥Min(εfkEfk)
where “p” means “thickness of parasitic dielectrics” and “k” refers to the “kth” thickness, with 1≤k≤M,
with the following additional condition:
C/ when said dielectric layer 100 consists of more than one dielectric film 100i, then any interface Σ between two dielectric films 100a satisfies the following conditions:
εplEpl≥Min(εfiEfi)
where “p” means “thickness of parasitic dielectrics” and “l” refers to the “lth” thickness, with 1≤l≤PΣ.
In other words, the design of the stack which constitutes the capacitor is made so that, in the area corresponding to the opposite surface of the two charge-bearing structures, at best 100% of the surface of a dielectric film is in contact either with a charge-bearing structure or with another dielectric film, to avoid the presence of parasitic dielectric areas at the different interfaces.
The advantage of having a dielectric layer consisting of several dielectric films is to minimize the influence of a defect in a dielectric film. Indeed, it is statistically unlikely that N defects are superimposed in a stack of N dielectric films (N≥2). The presence of a defect in a dielectric film is therefore not unacceptable relative to the stack. In the presence of a single film, the defect is inherently unacceptable.
Hereinafter there will be described a method which makes it possible to obtain a capacitor as presented above.
In the context of this example, the following assumptions are taken into account:
Throughout this example and in
This method is implemented by a first metallization step of the free side of the main dielectric film 100 to obtain the basic configuration as defined above in the description. Thus, the dielectric film 100 is directly in contact with two opposite electronic charge-bearing structures.
A second step consists of manufacturing the capacitor itself. For this, it is necessary to coil on itself the metallized dielectric film 100 provided with its support layer 101 or stack several identical structures of this type.
The dielectric character of the support layer 101 then acts as complementary insulator between the two ECBSs (in this case the coiled or stacked metallized sides). It is therefore necessary to satisfy the following relation:
e
f
′E
f
′≥e
f
E
f
so that the capacitor can operate independently of any breakdown through the support layer 101.
To do this, a first variant consists of using a support layer 101 which is metallized on its two opposite sides, taking care to match the metallization of the free side with that of the main dielectric film 100 (this means that the metallizations are mirrored from one another). Thus, the two metallized sides match at the time of coiling or stacking, so that they then behave as one and the same ECBS.
Reference can be made to
A second variant consists in using a support layer 101 which is metallized only on one side.
Under these conditions, the non-metallized side of the support layer 101 is a priori not in direct contact with the metallized side of the dielectric film 100, in the sense defined above in the description. “Parasitic” dielectric areas may therefore exist at the interface.
In this case, it is advantageous to use a support layer 101 of relative dielectric permittivity εf′≤10, while satisfying the conventional principles of manufacturing a metallized film capacitor (heat treatment for example).
This is again a very simplified artist view given by way of illustration. Especially, the spacing represented is exaggerated and is not representative of reality.
Another variant would be to take the following precautions:
A first precaution is to carry out the operations of coiling or stacking under vacuum (pressure ≤10 mbar typically).
A second precaution, independent of the previous one, is to use, as a metallized layer or as a complement thereto, porous metal strips which, by letting the air escape at the time of coiling or stacking, will ensuring direct contact between ECBS and dielectric films.
A third precaution, complementary to the previous ones, is to ensure a good plating of each new layer on the previous ones during coiling or stacking, by the application of a pressure via a pressure roller for example, or by a relevant control of the tension angle in the implementation of the coiling.
In the context of this example, the following assumptions are taken into account:
It appears quite clearly that this last configuration is very close to the previous configuration, except that the films 100 and 300 are to be considered as a single entity, and must follow the same recommendations as those expressed above. It will be advantageous to use as films 101 and 301 (
Again, an important variant lies in the fact that the main dielectric film 100, with its support film 300, is capable of undergoing a conventional metallization method, such as vacuum evaporation, for example. This variant follows the same recommendations as those above (recommendations described at the end of Example 1—another variant), whether in the case of a metallization of a side (as shown by the stack of
In the examples which have been described above, the case is selected wherein the main dielectric film was not self-supporting.
However, it is also possible to manufacture a film capacitor in accordance with the invention, with a main dielectric film which is self-supporting.
This aspect will be described in detail below, with reference to
In the context of this example, the following assumptions are taken into account:
The method is implemented by a first step of metallizing the two sides of a self-supporting film 100 to obtain the basic configuration as defined above in the description. Thus, the dielectric film is directly in contact with two opposite electronic charge-bearing structures.
In this figure and following figures, the metallization layers are referenced as M.
A second step consists of manufacturing the capacitor itself. To do so, it is required to coil the metallized dielectric film on its both sides 100 or stack several identical structures of this type. It is however required to insulate the two metallized sides from each other during coiling or stacking, by the introduction of a second dielectric film 200.
To do this, a first variant consists of using a dielectric film 200 which is metallized on its both sides, taking care to match the metallized sides (so that the films are mirrored from each other). Thus, the two sides matching at the time of coiling or stacking then act as one and the same ECBS.
In this case, we will take advantage of the fact that using films 100 and 200 of the same nature makes it possible to double the volume capacitance of the capacitor.
On the other hand, if a dielectric film 200 of different nature (of thickness [ef′] and of dielectric strength [Ef′]) is used, it will be then necessary to satisfy the following rule:
e
f
′E
f
′≥e
f
E
f
so that the capacitor can operate independently of any breakdown through the second dielectric film 200.
Reference can be made to
A second variant consists of using a dielectric film 100 which is metallized on only one side, taking care to match the metallized side with one of those of the dielectric film 100. Thus, the metallization of the dielectric film 200 is mirrored with one of the metallizations of the dielectric film 100, and the two sides matching at the time of coiling or stacking then act as one and the same ECBS.
However, the non-metallized side of the dielectric film 200 is a priori not in direct contact with the second metallized side of the dielectric film 100, in the sense defined above in the description. “Parasitic” dielectric areas may therefore exist at the interface.
In this case, it is advantageous to use a dielectric film 200 of relative dielectric permittivity εf′≤10 while satisfying the conventional principles of manufacturing a metallized film capacitor (heat treatment for example).
Reference can be made to
This is again a very simplified artist view given by way of illustration. Especially, the spacing represented is exaggerated and is not representative of reality.
Another variant would be to use the principles presented above, at the end of Example 1.
A third variant consists of using a non-metallized dielectric film 200.
In this case, none of the sides of the dielectric film 200 is a priori in direct contact with the metallized sides of the dielectric film 100, in the sense defined above in the description. “Parasitic” dielectric areas may therefore exist at each interface.
In this case, it is advantageous to use a dielectric film 200 of relative dielectric permittivity εf′≤10 while satisfying the conventional principles of manufacturing a metallized film capacitor (heat treatment for example). The result of the implementation of this variant is illustrated in
Another variant would be to use the principles presented above, at the end of Example 1.
In the context of this example, the following assumptions are taken into account:
The main dielectric film 100, of εf≥10, is self-supporting. Films of this material, of thickness [ef] from 0.05 μm to 50 μm, can be manufactured by extrusion or coating, for example.
The main dielectric film 100 is a priori not capable of undergoing a conventional metallization method.
The method is then carried out by coiling (for the coiled capacitor version) or by stacking (for the stacked capacitor version):
In the case of a stack, a structure such as the one represented in
It is advantageous to use films 100 and 200 of the same nature, which makes it possible to double the volume capacitance of the capacitor. If a dielectric film 200 of different nature (of thickness [ef′], and of dielectric strength [Ef′]) is used, it will be necessary to satisfy the following rule:
e
f
′E
f
′≥e
f
E
f
such that the capacitor can operate independently of any breakdown through the dielectric film 200.
Another possibility is to use the principles presented above, at the end of Example 1.
A variant can be considered when the main dielectric film 100 is capable of undergoing a conventional metallization method, such as vacuum evaporation for example.
Indeed, during the use of a capacitor configuration, any film can be made necessary if the power requested by the application is too important to be transported by a simple metallization.
In this case, the method according to the invention is made by metallization of the two sides of the main dielectric film 100 to obtain the basic configuration as defined above in the description. Thus, a dielectric film is directly in contact with two opposite ECBSs.
The method resulting from this step is represented in
A second step consists of manufacturing the capacitor itself. To that end, it suffices to apply the method described above.
In the case of a stack, a structure such as the one represented in
As a remark, the metallization of both sides of the dielectric film 200 is recommended but not necessary, depending on its nature. Likewise, it is possible to consider a mixed method where only one side of the main dielectric film 100 would be metallized. In this case, it is necessary to follow the precautions required by the most constraining of the methods considered.
General Remarks:
The known techniques inherent in securing the metallized film capacitors (high-resistivity metallization, variable resistivity metallization, metallization with incorporated fuses, etc.) are advantageously applicable to all the metallized film configurations described above, however without the need to be detailed specifically.
However, these techniques can make it possible to reduce the threshold by 90% of direct contact or to authorize the presence, in areas without direct contact, of dielectrics not satisfying the conditions defined above. In doing so, there will be breakdowns localized on all the areas in question. But, subject to proper sizing of the safety devices, these breakdowns should themselves be secure. The consequence is an electrical isolation de facto of the areas in question and the achievement of an ideal configuration with 100% of direct contact between dielectric film and ECBS. This is done to the detriment of the opposite connected surface, which will have decreased the total surface of the secured areas.
The known technique inherent in securing the metallized film capacitors which uses fuses incorporated in the metallization works on the principle of an adequacy between the energy locally stored in the capacitor (that is to say in a reasonably close environment in terms of electricity of the fuse) and the energy required to operate (i.e., demetallize) said fuse and, optionally, the surrounding area. Such a technique is not applicable in a conventional all-film capacitor, that is to say using a dielectric insulator of low relative permittivity εf (εf<10).
Indeed, the locally available energy remains too low compared to the energy that would be needed to melt a fuse designed in the metal sheet that serves as ECBS. This is no longer the case in a VHCFC where the high relative permittivity of the electrical insulator (εf≥10) makes it possible to significantly increase the energy density stored.
All-film capacitors can be conceived, made according to the configurations described above and using one or more ECBSs 300 and/or 400 including directly incorporated fuses, as they would be for a metallization. The techniques of manufacturing fuses will obviously be different. The following techniques can be considered:
1/ removal of material from a solid metal sheet, the remaining material constituting the fuses:
2/ addition of material to a solid metal sheet, part of the added material constituting the fuses:
this list is not exhaustive.
The known techniques inherent manufacturing a capacitor (respect of a margin, of a possible film offset, use of a corrugated edge, metallization by projection, heat treatment, connectivity, packaging, under-voltage burn-in, disconnection system in case of overpressure, etc.) are advantageously applicable to all the configurations described here.
It is clear that most of what is presented in the present application can be applied to a dielectric layer consisting of several dielectric films and not of a single dielectric film, on condition that a direct contact, in the sense defined above, is respected at each interface in the dielectric layer.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1659489 | Oct 2016 | FR | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2017/074619 | 9/28/2017 | WO | 00 |
