This invention is directed to the field of watercraft, and in particular to surface piercing propellers in a ventilated tunnel with a protective shroud and keel and steering fins forward of the center-of-gravity of the vessel.
It is well known in the industry that protecting the propeller of a vessel by a keel reduces the chances of damage to the propeller. It is also well known in the industry that raising the propeller up and in a tunnel reduces the chance for unplanned underwater impact. It is further known in the industry that a protective shroud provides an added level of protection for the propeller. Unfortunately it is also well known within the industry that keels and shrouds tend to have other negative side effects not the least of which are reduced acceleration and reduced steering performance. In addition, shrouds can become a source of weed entanglement.
Examples of protective shrouds can be found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,544,082; 6,475,045; 5,890,937; 4,957,459; 4,826,461; 4,789,302; 4,694,645; 4,680,017; 4,637,801; 3,859,953; 3,035,538; 2,244,217.
What is needed in the art is a shroud/keel combination that provides a level of protection for the propeller without hurting steering performance or acceleration and without entangling weeds.
The instant invention is a keel/shroud assembly around the propeller with greatly increased tip clearance to provide improved acceleration.
Another objective of the invention is to provide enhanced steering performance by adding fins in front of the center-of-gravity of the boat.
Another objective of the invention is to provide a means for weeds to shed from the protective shroud.
Still another objective of the instant invention is to teach the use of two steering rudders located inside the propeller slip stream.
Still another objective of the invention is to provide simplistic installation by inclusion of a conventional rudder system to the mid-section mounting base.
Other objectives and advantages of this invention will become apparent from the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein are set forth, by way of illustration and example, certain embodiments of this invention. The drawings constitute a part of this specification and include exemplary embodiments of the present invention and illustrate various objects and features thereof.
Now referring to the Figures in general, depicted is a shroud and keel arrangements along with steering fins forward of the center of gravity. The use of a shroud and keel is beneficial to most any type of propulsion systems and has particular benefit for use with a drop-in vessel propulsion module which employs a tunnel created for a surface piercing propeller. The module, or drive gears, are a rigid assembly wherein the shroud protects the module from impact.
A shrouded propeller of the instant invention may include a keel and can be used with conventional propellers as well as surface piercing propellers. The shroud avoids the necessity for a breakaway gear case such as the Volvo IPS or Mercury Zeus, where breakaway design is critical to vessel safety. The IPS and Zeus extend beneath a vessel making them susceptible to impact with submerged objects. The shroud of the instant embodiment eliminates the need for a breakaway housing thereby providing a low cost, mechanically simple, propulsion system that allows a vessel to impact a submerged object without loss of the drive system.
It should be noted that the use of surface piercing propellers requires proper distancing of a shroud to the propeller tips to avoid turbulence that can prevent planning of the vessel. A surface piercing propeller is a propeller that is positioned so that when the vessel is underway the water line passes right through the propeller's hub. This definition is set forth in the article Surface-Piercing Propellers by Paul Kamen which was published in Professional Boatbuilder magazine. Conventional propellers show little acceleration differences upon placement of the shroud near the propeller tip.
Now referring to
Shroud clearance is determined by a propeller tip clearance that can be determined by a measurement of the propeller diameter. Preferably tip clearance is greater than 5% of the propeller diameter to allow the vessel to achieve planning speeds. A distance between the propeller tip and the shroud greater than approximately 30% propeller diameter does not further increase performance characteristics. The protective shroud (10) extends from the bottom surface of the hull (80) to over the propeller tips to protect the propeller and the gear case from impact with submerged matter and attaches to the protective shroud (10).
Both shrouds and keels of ANY configuration contribute to decreased steering performance because vessels are normally steered by sliding the transom sideways (slipping). The addition of a keel resists sliding the hull sideways in a turn. In order to compensate for this reduced turning action, it has been determined that two design features can contribute to restoring steering performance. The first is the use of dual rudders in the prop wash which provide a stronger sliding force at the transom and the second being the addition of one or more steering fins, as often found on Inboard ski boats, forward of the L.C.G. (longitudinal center of gravity). It is the combination of these two features (dual rudders and steering fins) that produce sufficient steering force to compensate for the shroud and keel.
It is to be understood that while I have illustrated and described certain forms of my invention, it is not to be limited to the specific forms or arrangement of parts herein described and shown. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes may be made without departing from the scope of the invention and the invention is not to be considered limited to what is shown in the drawings and described in the specification.
This Application is based upon Provisional Patent Application No. 60/889,596, filed Feb. 13, 2007, and related to application Ser. No. 12/030,084 filed simultaneously with the instant application on Feb. 12, 2008, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2244217 | Pries | Jun 1941 | A |
2272661 | Finley | Feb 1942 | A |
2976836 | Fageol | Mar 1961 | A |
3035538 | Willard | May 1962 | A |
3164122 | Fageol | Jan 1965 | A |
3859953 | Todt | Jan 1975 | A |
4637801 | Schultz | Jan 1987 | A |
4680017 | Eller | Jul 1987 | A |
4689206 | Owen et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4694645 | Flyborg | Sep 1987 | A |
4789302 | Gruzling | Dec 1988 | A |
4826461 | Newman | May 1989 | A |
4907994 | Jones | Mar 1990 | A |
4957459 | Snyder | Sep 1990 | A |
5082465 | Wine | Jan 1992 | A |
5108325 | Livingston et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5326294 | Schoell | Jul 1994 | A |
5890937 | Granger | Apr 1999 | A |
6045420 | Small et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6193573 | Small | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6213824 | Small | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6260503 | Allison | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6293218 | White | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6406341 | Morejohn | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6475045 | Schultz et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6544082 | Finerty | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6732700 | Suganuma | May 2004 | B2 |
6863013 | Noyes | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7252566 | Kamio et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7311059 | Loui et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080200081 A1 | Aug 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60889596 | Feb 2007 | US |