1. Background of Related Art
The present disclosure relates to a forceps used for open or endoscopic surgical procedures. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to a switch assembly for a surgical forceps that can vary the resistance of an actuation switch of the surgical forceps.
2. Technical Field
A hemostat or forceps is a simple plier-like tool which uses mechanical action between its jaws to constrict vessels and is commonly used in open surgical procedures to grasp, dissect and/or clamp tissue. Electrosurgical forceps utilize both mechanical clamping action and electrical energy to effect hemostasis by heating the tissue and blood vessels to coagulate, cauterize and/or seal tissue.
Certain surgical procedures require sealing and cutting blood vessels or vascular tissue. Several journal articles have disclosed methods for sealing small blood vessels using electrosurgery. An article entitled Studies on Coagulation and the Development of an Automatic Computerized Bipolar Coagulator, J. Neurosurg., Volume 75, July 1991, describes a bipolar coagulator which is used to seal small blood vessels. The article states that it is not possible to safely coagulate arteries with a diameter larger than 2 to 2.5 mm. A second article entitled Automatically Controlled Bipolar Electrocoagulation—“COA-COMP,” Neurosurg. Rev. (1984), pp. 187-190, describes a method for terminating electrosurgical power to the vessel so that charring of the vessel walls can be avoided.
By utilizing an electrosurgical forceps, a surgeon can either cauterize, coagulate/desiccate, reduce or slow bleeding and/or seal vessels by controlling the intensity, frequency and duration of the electrosurgical energy applied to the tissue. Generally, the electrical configuration of electrosurgical forceps can be categorized in two classifications: 1) monopolar electrosurgical forceps; and 2) bipolar electrosurgical forceps.
Monopolar forceps utilize one active electrode associated with the clamping end effector and a remote patient return electrode or pad which is typically attached externally to the patient. When the electrosurgical energy is applied, the energy travels from the active electrode, to the surgical site, through the patient and to the return electrode.
Bipolar electrosurgical forceps utilize two generally opposing electrodes which are disposed on the inner opposing surfaces of the end effectors and which are both electrically coupled to an electrosurgical generator. Each electrode is charged to a different electric potential. Since tissue is a conductor of electrical energy, when the effectors are utilized to grasp tissue therebetween, the electrical energy can be selectively transferred through the tissue.
In order to effect a proper seal with larger vessels, two predominant mechanical parameters must be accurately controlled—the pressure applied to the vessel and the gap between the electrodes both of which affect thickness of the sealed vessel. More particularly, accurate application of the pressure is important to oppose the walls of the vessel, to reduce the tissue impedance to a low enough value that allows enough electrosurgical energy through the tissue, to overcome the forces of expansion during tissue heating and to contribute to the end tissue thickness which is an indication of a good seal. It has been determined that a fused vessel wall is optimum between 0.001 and 0.006 inches. Below this range, the seal may shred or tear and above this range the lumens may not be properly or effectively sealed.
With respect to smaller vessels, the pressure applied to the tissue tends to become less relevant whereas the gap distance between the electrically conductive surfaces becomes more significant for effective sealing. In other words, the chances of the two electrically conductive surfaces touching during activation increases as the vessels become smaller.
Electrosurgical methods may be able to seal larger vessels using an appropriate electrosurgical power curve, coupled with an instrument capable of applying a large closure force to the vessel walls. It is thought that the process of coagulating small vessels is fundamentally different than electrosurgical vessel sealing. For the purposes herein, “coagulation” is defined as a process of desiccating tissue wherein the tissue cells are ruptured and dried and vessel sealing is defined as the process of liquefying the collagen in the tissue so that it reforms into a fused mass. Thus, coagulation of small vessels is sufficient to permanently close them. Larger vessels need to be sealed to assure permanent closure.
Numerous bipolar electrosurgical forceps have been proposed in the past for various open surgical procedures. However, some of these designs may not provide uniformly reproducible pressure to the blood vessel and may result in an ineffective or non-uniform seal. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 2,176,479 to Willis, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,005,714 and 4,031,898 to Hiltebrandt, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,827,274, 5,290,287 and 5,312,433 to Boebel et al., U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,370,980, 4,552,143, 5,026,370 and 5,116,332 to Lottick, U.S. Pat. No. 5,443,463 to Stern et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,484,436 to Eggers et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 5,951,549 to Richardson et al., all relate to electrosurgical instruments for coagulating, cutting and/or sealing vessels or tissue.
Many of these instruments include blade members or shearing members which simply cut tissue in a mechanical and/or electromechanical manner and are relatively ineffective for vessel sealing purposes. Other instruments rely on clamping pressure alone to procure proper sealing thickness and are not designed to take into account gap tolerances and/or parallelism and flatness requirements which are parameters which, if properly controlled, can assure a consistent and effective tissue seal. For example, it is known that it is difficult to adequately control thickness of the resulting sealed tissue by controlling clamping pressure alone for either of two reasons: 1) if too much force is applied, there is a possibility that the two poles will touch and energy will not be transferred through the tissue resulting in an ineffective seal; or 2) if too low a force is applied, a thicker less reliable seal is created. Similarly, an amount of force required to actuate a switch of the forceps may be too high or too low depending on the preferences of the user of the forceps.
According to one aspect of the present disclosure, a switch assembly for an electrosurgical instrument is provided. The switch assembly includes a switch housing, a switch, a first biasing member, and one or more additional biasing members. The switch is disposed within the switch housing and is movably disposed between an activated position to initiate delivery of electrosurgical energy and a deactivated position to terminate delivery of electrosurgical energy. The first biasing member is selectively positionable adjacent the switch and in communication therewith. The first biasing member includes a first thickness that provides a first resistance to resist movement of the switch between the activated and the deactivated positions when positioned in the switch housing. The additional biasing member is selectively interchangeable with the first biasing member. The additional biasing member(s) includes a different thickness than the first thickness to provide a different resistance than the first resistance and likewise resist movement of the switch between the activated and the deactivated positions when positioned in the switch housing.
In some embodiments, each biasing member includes a protrusion extending therefrom and the switch may include a protrusion extending therefrom. The protrusion of the biasing members and the protrusion of the switch engage one another during movement of the switch between the activated and deactivated positions.
In some embodiments, the biasing members have a U-shaped configuration. Each biasing member may include a first leg, a bent portion and a second leg. The first leg may be secured with the switch housing. The second leg may be coupled to the first leg via the bent portion. The second leg flexes inwardly towards the first leg upon movement of the switch from the deactivated position to the activated position.
In some embodiments, the switch assembly further includes a post extending from the switch and a snap dome in coaxial alignment with the post. Upon movement of the switch from the deactivated position to the activated position, the post engages the snap dome. The switch assembly may further include a spring disposed between the switch and the snap dome and configured to resiliently bias the switch toward the deactivated position.
In another aspect of the present disclosure, an electrosurgical instrument is provided. The electrosurgical instrument includes a first arm and a second arm movable relative to one another between an expanded position and an approximated position, a switch assembly, and a pair of jaw members. The switch assembly is disposed within the first arm and includes a switch housing, a switch, a first biasing member, and one or more additional biasing members. The switch is disposed within the switch housing and movably disposed between an activated position to initiate delivery of electrosurgical energy and a deactivated position to terminate delivery of electrosurgical energy. The first biasing member is selectively positionable adjacent the switch and in communication therewith. The first biasing member includes a first thickness that provides a first resistance to resist movement of the switch between the activated and the deactivated positions when positioned in the switch housing. The additional biasing member(s) is selectively interchangeable with the first biasing member. The additional biasing member(s) includes a different thickness than the first thickness to provide a different resistance than the first resistance and likewise resists movement of the switch between the activated and the deactivated positions when positioned in the switch housing. The first jaw member is coupled to the second arm and the second jaw member is coupled to the first arm. The jaw members are movable relative to one another between an expanded position and an approximated position.
In yet another aspect of the present disclosure, a method of performing an electrosurgical procedure is provided. The method includes providing a switch assembly of an electrosurgical instrument; selectively positioning one of a first and second biasing members adjacent a switch of the switch assembly and in communication therewith. In some embodiments, the method includes approximating first and second arms of the electrosurgical instrument to grasp tissue between first and second jaw members associated with the first and second arms; depressing the switch upon approximation of the first and second arms from a deactivated position to an intermediate position to relay information to the user corresponding to a grasping pressure applied to tissue grasped between the first and second jaw members; and
depressing the switch to overcome one of a first resistance or a second, different resistance of the one of the first or additional biasing members such that the switch is disposed in an activated position to activate a source of electrosurgical energy to supply electrosurgical energy to the first and second jaw members.
In some embodiments, depressing the switch to overcome the first resistance or the different resistance of the respective biasing members includes passing a protrusion of the switch over a protrusion of the one of the first and additional biasing members.
In some embodiments, depressing the switch to overcome the first resistance or the different resistance of the respective biasing members includes flexing a second leg of the respective biasing member inwardly towards a first leg of the respective biasing members. It is contemplated that depressing the switch to overcome the first resistance or the different resistance of the respective biasing members may further include engaging a snap dome with a post extending from the switch.
In some embodiments, the method further includes removing the one of the first and additional biasing members from the switch housing; and positioning the other of the one of the first and additional biasing members adjacent the switch and in communication therewith.
In the drawings and in the description that follows, the term “proximal”, as is traditional, will refer to the end of electrosurgical instrument that is closer to the user, while the term “distal” will refer to the end that is further from the user.
Embodiments of the present disclosure are described herein with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Referring initially to
As shown in
Handle assembly 100 includes a first arm or elongated shaft portion 112a and a second arm or elongated shaft portion 112b each having a proximal end 114a, 114b and a distal end 116a and 116b, respectively. End effector 200 attaches to distal ends 116a and 116b of shaft portions 112a and 112b, respectively. Opposing jaw members 210 and 220 are pivotably connected and movable relative to one another about a pivot 222 to grasp tissue therebetween.
Shaft portions 112a, 112b include respective handles 115, 117 disposed at proximal ends 114a and 114b thereof. Handles 115, 117 define respective finger holes 115a, 117a therethrough for receiving a finger of the user. Handles 115 and 117 facilitate movement of shaft portions 112a and 112b relative to one another, which, in turn, pivot jaw members 210 and 220 from an open or expanded position, in which jaw members 210 and 220 are disposed in spaced relation to one another, to a clamping or approximated position, in which jaw members 210 and 220 cooperate to grasp tissue therebetween.
With reference to
Switch housing 310 extends from an inner facing surface 132 of shaft portion 112b and is configured to house switch 320 (and the electrical components associated therewith), which may be in the form of a depressible button. In some embodiments, switch housing 310 may be integrally connected to or monolithically formed with proximal end 114b of shaft portion 112b or proximal end 114a of shaft portion 112a.
Switch 320 is movably disposed within switch housing 310 between an activated position to initiate delivery of electrosurgical energy to jaw members 210, 220 and a deactivated position to terminate delivery of electrosurgical energy to jaw members 210, 220. Switch 320 aligns with an opposing inner facing surface 134 of proximal end 114a of shaft portion 112a such that upon approximation of shaft portions 112a and 112b, switch 320 is depressed into biasing engagement with opposing inner facing surface 134 of proximal end 114a of shaft portion 112a.
With reference to
As mentioned above, switch assembly 300 includes snap dome or dome switch 326 and a printed circuit board 336 that supports dome switch 326. Dome switch 326 is in coaxial alignment with post 324 of switch 320 such that post 324 engages dome switch 326 upon movement of switch 320 from the deactivated position to the activated position. Printed circuit board 336 is attached to switch housing 310 and electrically couples the electrosurgical source or generator (not shown) and jaw members 210, 220 such that upon inversion of dome switch 326, via engagement with post 324, an electrical pathway is created through which electrosurgical energy can travel from the electrosurgical source to jaw members 210, 220.
With continued reference to
First and second biasing members 340, 350 each have a U-shaped configuration and are fabricated from plastic. In some embodiments, first and second biasing members 340, 350 may be variously configured, such as, for example, tapered, uniform, non-uniform, circular, triangular, squared, arcuate, undulating and/or polygonal and may be fabricated from any suitable, flexible material. First and second biasing members 340, 350 each include a first leg 342a, 352a, an intermediate bent portion 344, 354, and a second leg 342b, 352b. In some embodiments, first leg 342a of first biasing member 340 may have the same thickness as first leg 352a of second biasing member 350 while bent portions 344, 354 of biasing members 340, 350 have different thicknesses from one another.
First legs 342a, 352a are configured to be selectively secured within switch housing 310 via a plurality of capture members 362 extending from switch housing 310. Capture members 362 are arranged to define a channel configured to accommodate first legs 342a, 352a therein. It is envisioned that first legs 342a, 352a may be configured for snap fit engagement with capture members 362 such that first legs 342a, 352a are prevented from moving relative to switch housing 310.
Second legs 342b, 352b are coupled to first legs 342a, 352a, respectively, via bent portions 344, 354 such that first legs 342a, 352a and second legs 342b, 352b are in substantial side-by-side, parallel alignment with one another. In some embodiments, first and second legs 342a, 352a, 342b, 352b may be variously oriented relative to one another, such as, for example, positioned at an acute angle, an obtuse angle, or a substantially perpendicular angle relative to one another. Second legs 342b, 352b each have a protrusion or an arcuate bump 346, 356 extending from an intermediate portion thereof. When one of first or second biasing members 340, 350 is selectively positioned in switch housing 310, bump 346 or bump 356 of second legs 342b, 352b, respectively, is in coaxial alignment with protrusion 332 of switch 320. During movement of switch 320 between the activated and deactivated positions, protrusion 332 and bump 346 of first biasing member 340 or bump 356 of second biasing member 350 engage and pass over one another. Upon bump 346 and protrusion 332 or bump 356 and protrusion 332 passing over one another, second legs 342b, 352b of first or second biasing members 340, 350, respectively, flex inwardly towards respective first legs 342a, 352a under a resistance.
In some embodiments, the resistance of biasing members 340, 350 may be adjusted by varying the size and/or shape of bumps 346, 356. For example, a larger bump 346, 356 will correspond to a greater resistance of biasing members 340, 350, respectively.
In operation, one of the first or second biasing members 340, 350 is selectively positioned adjacent switch 320 and in communication therewith. For example, first biasing member 340 may be selected because its ability to resist movement of switch 320 between the activated and deactivated positions provides for a preferred tactility to a user of forceps 10. Alternately, a user that prefers switch 320 to be more responsive to a force exerted thereon may prefer to use a forceps 10 having second biasing member 350 selectively positioned within switch housing 310. In some embodiments, a plurality of biasing members may be provided to accommodate various user preferences.
With one of first or second biasing members 340, 350 disposed within switch housing 310, first and second shaft portions 112a, 112b may be approximated and, in turn, jaw members 210, 220 are pivoted to an approximated position to grasp tissue therebetween. Upon approximating first and second shaft portions 112a, 112b, inner facing surface 134 of shaft portion 112a engages switch 320 to depress switch 320 from the deactivated position, as shown in
Continued approximation of first and second jaw members 210, 220 overcomes the first resistance provided by first biasing member 340 (or the second resistance provided by second biasing member 350) to further depress switch 320 to the activated position (not shown). To overcome the resilient bias of first or second biasing members 340, 350, a sufficient amount of force is required to pass protrusion 332 of switch 320 over bump 346 of first biasing member 340 or bump 356 of second biasing member 350. Upon overcoming the resistance provided by first or second biasing members 340, 350, post 328 of switch 320 engages snap dome 326 to dispose switch 320 in the activated position. In the activated position, a source of electrosurgical energy is activated to supply electrosurgical energy to first and second jaw members 210, 220 to seal the tissue disposed therebetween. Upon switch 320 moving to the activated position, the user receives a second tactile response indicating the electrosurgical activation of end effector 200.
In some embodiments, switch 320 may include a plurality of other tactile responses between the above discussed first and second tactile responses and/or subsequent to the second tactile response that correspond to particular functions of forceps 10 such as, for example, operation of a knife (not shown) and/or an actuation assembly (not shown), and/or operation of a safety lockout mechanism (not shown) associated with the actuation assembly (not shown), as discussed in detail in U.S. application Ser. No. 14/105,374, which is incorporated by reference herein.
The various embodiments disclosed herein may also be configured to work with robotic surgical systems and what is commonly referred to as “Telesurgery.” Such systems employ various robotic elements to assist the surgeon in the operating theatre and allow remote operation (or partial remote operation) of surgical instrumentation. Various robotic arms, gears, cams, pulleys, electric and mechanical motors, etc. may be employed for this purpose and may be designed with a robotic surgical system to assist the surgeon during the course of an operation or treatment. Such robotic systems may include remotely steerable systems, automatically flexible surgical systems, remotely flexible surgical systems, remotely articulating surgical systems, wireless surgical systems, modular or selectively configurable remotely operated surgical systems, etc.
While several embodiments of the disclosure have been shown in the drawings, it is not intended that the disclosure be limited thereto, as it is intended that the disclosure be as broad in scope as the art will allow and that the specification be read likewise. Therefore, the above description should not be construed as limiting, but merely as exemplifications of particular embodiments. Those skilled in the art will envision other modifications within the scope and spirit of the claims appended hereto.
The present application claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/042,543, filed on Aug. 27, 2014, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2176479 | Willis | Oct 1939 | A |
3100489 | Bagley | Aug 1963 | A |
3824363 | Fuller | Jul 1974 | A |
4005714 | Hiltebrandt | Feb 1977 | A |
4031898 | Hiltebrandt et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
D249549 | Pike | Sep 1978 | S |
D263020 | Rau, III | Feb 1982 | S |
4370980 | Lottick | Feb 1983 | A |
4461297 | Sutter | Jul 1984 | A |
4461305 | Cibley | Jul 1984 | A |
4552143 | Lottick | Nov 1985 | A |
D295893 | Sharkany et al. | May 1988 | S |
D295894 | Sharkany et al. | May 1988 | S |
D298353 | Manno | Nov 1988 | S |
D299413 | DeCarolis | Jan 1989 | S |
5026370 | Lottick | Jun 1991 | A |
5116332 | Lottick | May 1992 | A |
5122139 | Sutter | Jun 1992 | A |
5211655 | Hasson | May 1993 | A |
D343453 | Noda | Jan 1994 | S |
5290287 | Boebel et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5312433 | Boebel et al. | May 1994 | A |
D348930 | Olson | Jul 1994 | S |
D349341 | Lichtman et al. | Aug 1994 | S |
5346459 | Allen | Sep 1994 | A |
5354291 | Bales | Oct 1994 | A |
D354564 | Medema | Jan 1995 | S |
5383875 | Bays et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
D358887 | Feinberg | May 1995 | S |
5443463 | Stern et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5454827 | Aust et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5484436 | Eggers et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5498256 | Furnish | Mar 1996 | A |
5512721 | Young et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5601601 | Tal et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
D384413 | Zlock et al. | Sep 1997 | S |
5746739 | Sutter | May 1998 | A |
H1745 | Paraschac | Aug 1998 | H |
5827274 | Bonnet et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
D402028 | Grimm et al. | Dec 1998 | S |
D408018 | McNaughton | Apr 1999 | S |
5891140 | Ginn et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5891142 | Eggers et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5951549 | Richardson et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
D416089 | Barton et al. | Nov 1999 | S |
6010516 | Hulka | Jan 2000 | A |
D424694 | Tetzlaff et al. | May 2000 | S |
D425201 | Tetzlaff et al. | May 2000 | S |
6106542 | Toybin et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117158 | Measamer et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
H1904 | Yates et al. | Oct 2000 | H |
D449886 | Tetzlaff et al. | Oct 2001 | S |
D453923 | Olson | Feb 2002 | S |
D454951 | Bon | Mar 2002 | S |
D457958 | Dycus et al. | May 2002 | S |
D457959 | Tetzlaff et al. | May 2002 | S |
H2037 | Yates et al. | Jul 2002 | H |
D465281 | Lang | Nov 2002 | S |
D466209 | Bon | Nov 2002 | S |
D493888 | Reschke | Aug 2004 | S |
D496997 | Dycus et al. | Oct 2004 | S |
D499181 | Dycus et al. | Nov 2004 | S |
D502994 | Blake, III | Mar 2005 | S |
D509297 | Wells | Sep 2005 | S |
D525361 | Hushka | Jul 2006 | S |
7083613 | Treat | Aug 2006 | B2 |
D531311 | Guerra et al. | Oct 2006 | S |
D533274 | Visconti et al. | Dec 2006 | S |
D533942 | Kerr et al. | Dec 2006 | S |
D535027 | James et al. | Jan 2007 | S |
7166106 | Bartel et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
D538932 | Malik | Mar 2007 | S |
D541418 | Schechter et al. | Apr 2007 | S |
D541611 | Aglassinger | May 2007 | S |
D541938 | Kerr et al. | May 2007 | S |
7211079 | Treat | May 2007 | B2 |
D545432 | Watanabe | Jun 2007 | S |
D547154 | Lee | Jul 2007 | S |
D564662 | Moses et al. | Mar 2008 | S |
D567943 | Moses et al. | Apr 2008 | S |
D575395 | Hushka | Aug 2008 | S |
D575401 | Hixson et al. | Aug 2008 | S |
D582038 | Swoyer et al. | Dec 2008 | S |
7628791 | Garrison et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
D617900 | Kingsley et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
D617901 | Unger et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
D617902 | Twomey et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
D617903 | Unger et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
D618798 | Olson et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
D621503 | Otten et al. | Aug 2010 | S |
D627462 | Kingsley | Nov 2010 | S |
D628289 | Romero | Nov 2010 | S |
D628290 | Romero | Nov 2010 | S |
D630324 | Reschke | Jan 2011 | S |
7922718 | Moses et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
D649249 | Guerra | Nov 2011 | S |
D649643 | Allen, IV et al. | Nov 2011 | S |
8152806 | Black et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
D661394 | Romero et al. | Jun 2012 | S |
8679140 | Butcher | Mar 2014 | B2 |
RE44834 | Dumbauld et al. | Apr 2014 | E |
8939973 | Garrison et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8945127 | Garrison et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9113907 | Allen, IV et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9113937 | Collings et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9119630 | Townsend et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9124013 | Frushhour et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
20020099258 | Staskin | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030018331 | Dycus et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030109875 | Tetzlaff et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030171747 | Kanehira et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030229344 | Dycus et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040176762 | Lawes et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040243125 | Dycus et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050154387 | Moses et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20070219409 | Shimizu | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070260241 | Dalla Betta et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080114349 | Treat | May 2008 | A1 |
20080215048 | Hafner et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20100030205 | Herzon | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20110184459 | Malkowski et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110190765 | Chojin | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110251613 | Guerra et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110301592 | Kerr et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120083827 | Artale | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120136347 | Brustad et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20130018411 | Collings et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130296843 | Boudreaux | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140031821 | Garrison | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140031860 | Stoddard et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140046323 | Payne et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140066910 | Nau, Jr. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140066911 | Nau, Jr. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140074085 | Kerr | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140074091 | Arya et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140074092 | Horner et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140094798 | Garrison et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140094845 | Garrison et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140100564 | Garrison | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140100568 | Garrison | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140100569 | Lawes et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140100600 | Kendrick | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140104070 | Plaven | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140107443 | Hoarau et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140107646 | Garrison et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140107648 | Harper et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140107684 | Craig | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140107685 | O'Neill et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140114309 | Payne et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140121507 | Nau, Jr. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140121508 | Latimer et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140121661 | Schmaltz et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140135758 | Mueller | May 2014 | A1 |
20140135763 | Kappus et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140148807 | Kendrick | May 2014 | A1 |
20140180281 | Rusin | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140194875 | Reschke et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140221994 | Reschke | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140221999 | Cunningham et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140230243 | Roy et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140243811 | Reschke et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140257284 | Artale | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140257285 | Moua | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276803 | Hart | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
201299462 | Sep 2009 | CN |
2415263 | Oct 1975 | DE |
02514501 | Oct 1976 | DE |
2627679 | Jan 1977 | DE |
03423356 | Jun 1986 | DE |
03612646 | Apr 1987 | DE |
8712328 | Feb 1988 | DE |
04303882 | Feb 1995 | DE |
04403252 | Aug 1995 | DE |
19515914 | Jul 1996 | DE |
19506363 | Aug 1996 | DE |
29616210 | Nov 1996 | DE |
19608716 | Apr 1997 | DE |
19751106 | May 1998 | DE |
19751108 | May 1999 | DE |
19946527 | Jul 2001 | DE |
20121161 | Apr 2002 | DE |
10045375 | Oct 2002 | DE |
202007009165 | Aug 2007 | DE |
202007009317 | Aug 2007 | DE |
202007009318 | Aug 2007 | DE |
10031773 | Nov 2007 | DE |
202007016233 | Jan 2008 | DE |
19738457 | Jan 2009 | DE |
102004026179 | Jan 2009 | DE |
102008018406 | Jul 2009 | DE |
1281878 | Feb 2003 | EP |
1159926 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1645238 | Apr 2006 | EP |
1810625 | Jul 2007 | EP |
2347725 | Jul 2011 | EP |
2436330 | Apr 2012 | EP |
2659848 | Nov 2013 | EP |
2659849 | Nov 2013 | EP |
61-501068 | Sep 1984 | JP |
10-24051 | Jan 1989 | JP |
11-47150 | Jun 1989 | JP |
6-502328 | Mar 1992 | JP |
5-5106 | Jan 1993 | JP |
05-40112 | Feb 1993 | JP |
0006030945 | Feb 1994 | JP |
6-121797 | May 1994 | JP |
6-285078 | Oct 1994 | JP |
6-511401 | Dec 1994 | JP |
06343644 | Dec 1994 | JP |
07265328 | Oct 1995 | JP |
8-56955 | May 1996 | JP |
08252263 | Oct 1996 | JP |
8-289895 | Nov 1996 | JP |
8-317934 | Dec 1996 | JP |
8-317936 | Dec 1996 | JP |
9-10223 | Jan 1997 | JP |
09000538 | Jan 1997 | JP |
9-122138 | May 1997 | JP |
0010000195 | Jan 1998 | JP |
10-155798 | Jun 1998 | JP |
11-47149 | Feb 1999 | JP |
11-070124 | Mar 1999 | JP |
11-169381 | Jun 1999 | JP |
11-192238 | Jul 1999 | JP |
11244298 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2000-102545 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000-135222 | May 2000 | JP |
2000342599 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2000350732 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2001008944 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001-29355 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001029356 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001-03400 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001128990 | May 2001 | JP |
2001-190564 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2002-136525 | May 2002 | JP |
2002-528166 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2003-116871 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003-175052 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2003245285 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2004-517668 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004-528869 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2005-152663 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005-253789 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2006-015078 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2006-501939 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2006-095316 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2011125195 | Jun 2011 | JP |
401367 | Nov 1974 | SU |
0036986 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0059392 | Oct 2000 | WO |
0115614 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0154604 | Aug 2001 | WO |
02045589 | Jun 2002 | WO |
2006021269 | Mar 2006 | WO |
05110264 | Apr 2006 | WO |
08040483 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2011018154 | Feb 2011 | WO |
2011044343 | Apr 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 09/591,328, dated Jun. 9, 2000 (Thomas Patrick Ryan). |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/336,970, dated Dec. 17, 2008 (Sremcich et al.). |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/731,674, dated Dec. 31, 2012 (Siebrecht et al.). |
Michael Choti, “Abdominoperineal Resection with the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System and LigaSure Atlas 20 cm Open Instrument”; Innovations That Work, Jun. 2003. |
Chung et al., “Clinical Experience of Sutureless Closed Hemorrhoidectomy with LigaSure” Diseases of the Colon & Rectum vol. 46, No. 1 Jan. 2003. |
Tinkcler L.F., “Combined Diathermy and Suction Forceps”, Feb. 6, 1967 (Feb. 6, 1965), British Medical Journal Feb. 6, 1976, vol. 1, nr. 5431 p. 361, ISSN: 0007-1447. |
Carbonell et al., “Comparison of theGyrus PlasmaKinetic Sealer and the Valleylab LigaSure Device in the Hemostasis of Small, Medium, and Large-Sized Arteries” Carolinas Laparoscopic and Advanced Surgery Program, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC; Date: Aug. 2003. |
Peterson et al. “Comparison of Healing Process Following Ligation with Sutures and Bipolar Vessel Sealing” Surgical Technology International (2001). |
“Electrosurgery: A Historical Overview” Innovations in Electrosurgery; Sales/Product Literature; Dec. 31, 2000. |
Johnson et al. “Evaluation of a Bipolar Electrothermal Vessel Sealing Device in Hemorrhoidectomy” Sales/Product Literature; Jan. 2004. |
E. David Crawford “Evaluation of a New Vessel Sealing Device in Urologic Cancer Surgery”, 2000. |
Johnson et al. “Evaluation of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Hemorrhoidectormy” American College of Surgeons (ACS) Clinicla Congress Poster (2000). |
Muller et al., “Extended Left Hemicolectomy Using the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System” Innovations That Work, Sep. 1999. |
Kennedy et al. “High-burst-strength, feedback-controlled bipolar vessel sealing” Surgical Endoscopy (1998) 12: 876-878. |
Burdette et al. “In Vivo Probe Measurement Technique for Determining Dielectric Properties At VHF Through Microwave Frequencies”, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. MTT-28, No. 4, Apr. 1980 pp. 414-427. |
Carus et al., “Initial Experience With the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Abdominal Surgery” Innovations That Work, Jun. 2002. |
Heniford et al. “Initial Results with an Electrothermal Bipolar Vessel Sealer” Surgical Endoscopy (2000) 15:799-801. |
Herman et al., “Laparoscopic Intestinal Resection With the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System: A Case Report”; Innovations That Work, Feb. 2002. |
Koyle et al., “Laparoscopic Palomo Varicocele Ligation in Children and Adolescents” Pediatric Endosurgery & Innovative Techniques, vol. 6, No. 1, 2002. |
W. Scott Helton, “LigaSure Vessel Sealing System: Revolutionary Hemostasis Product for General Surgery”; Sales/Product Literature 1999. |
LigaSure Vessel Sealing System, the Seal of Confidence in General, Gynecologic, Urologic, and Laparaoscopic Surgery; Sales/Product Literature; Apr. 2002. |
Joseph Ortenberg “LigaSure System Used in Laparoscopic 1st and 2nd Stage Orchiopexy” Innovations That Work, Nov. 2002. |
Sigel et al. “The Mechanism of Blood Vessel Closure by High Frequency Electrocoagulation” Surgery Gynecology & Obstetrics, Oct. 1965 pp. 823-831. |
Sampayan et al, “Multilayer Ultra-High Gradient Insulator Technology” Discharges and Electrical Insulation in Vacuum, 1998. Netherlands Aug. 17-21, 1998; vol. 2, pp. 740-743. |
Paul G. Horgan, “A Novel Technique for Parenchymal Division During Hepatectomy” The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 181, No. 3, Apr. 2001 pp. 236-237. |
Benaron et al., “Optical Time-Of-Flight and Absorbance Imaging of Biologic Media”, Science, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC, vol. 259, Mar. 5, 1993, pp. 1463-1466. |
Olsson et al. “Radical Cystectomy in Females” Current Surgical Techniques in Urology, vol. 14, Issue 3, 2001. |
Palazzo et al. “Randomized clinical trial of Ligasure versus open haemorrhoidectomy” British Journal of Surgery 2002, 89, 154-157. |
Levy et al. “Randomized Trial of Suture Versus Electrosurgical Bipolar Vessel Sealing in Vaginal Hysterectomy” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 102, No. 1, Jul. 2003. |
“Reducing Needlestick Injuries in the Operating Room”, 2001. |
Bergdahl et al. “Studies on Coagulation and the Development of an Automatic Computerized Bipolar Coagulator” J. Neurosurg, vol. 75, Jul. 1991, pp. 148-151. |
Strasberg et al. “A Phase I Study of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Hepatic Surgery” Section of HPB Surger, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis MO, Presented at AHPBA, Feb. 2001. |
Sayfan et al. “Sutureless Closed Hemorrhoidectomy: A New Technique” Annals of Surgery vol. 234 No. 1 Jul. 2001; pp. 21-24. |
Levy et al., “Update on Hysterectomy—New Technologies and Techniques” OBG Management, Feb. 2003. |
Dulemba et al. “Use of a Bipolar Electrothermal Vessel Sealer in Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy” Sales/Product Literature; Jan. 2004. |
Strasberg et al., “Use of a Bipolar Vessel-Sealing Device for Parenchymal Transection During Liver Surgery” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 6, No. 4, Jul./Aug. 2002 pp. 569-574. |
Sengupta et al., “Use of a Computer-Controlled Bipolar Diathermy System in Radical Prostatectomies and Other Open Urological Surgery” ANZ Journal of Surgery (2001) 71.9 pp. 538-540. |
Rothenberg et al. “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Minimally Invasive Surgery in Children” Int'l Pediatric Endosurgery Group (IPEG) 2000. |
Crawford et al. “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Urologic Cancer Surgery” Grand Rounds in Urology 1999 vol. 1 Issue 4 pp. 10-17. |
Craig Johnson, “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Bloodless Hemorrhoidectomy” Innovations That Work, Mar. 2000. |
Levy et al. “Use of a New Energy-based Vessel Ligation Device During Vaginal Hysterectomy” Int'l Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) World Congress 1999. |
Barbara Levy, “Use of a New Vessel Ligation Device During Vaginal Hysterectomy” FIGO 2000, Washington, D.C. |
E. David Crawford “Use of a Novel Vessel Sealing Technology in Management of the Dorsal Veinous Complex”, 2000. |
Jarrett et al., “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System for Peri-Hilar Vessels in Laparoscopic Nephrectomy” Sales/Product Literature 2000. |
Crouch et al. “A Velocity-Dependent Model for Needle Insertion in Soft Tissue” MICCAI 2005; LNCS 3750 pp. 624-632, Dated: 2005. |
McLellan et al. “Vessel Sealing for Hemostasis During Pelvic Surgery” Int'l Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics FIGO World Congress 2000, Washington, D.C. |
McLellan et al. “Vessel Sealing for Hemostasis During Gynecologic Surgery” Sales/Product Literature 1999. |
European Search Report from Application No. EP14158818.6 dated May 28, 2014. |
The extended European Search Report from Application No. 14158819.4 dated Jun. 10, 2014. |
Vallfors et al., “Automatically Controlled Bipolar Electrosoagulation-‘COA-COMP’”, Neurosurgical Review 7:2-3 (1984) pp. 187-190. |
U.S. Appl. No. 08/926,869, dated Sep. 10, 1997 (Chandler et al.). |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/177,950, dated Oct. 23, 1998 (Frazier et al.). |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/387,883, dated Sep. 1, 1999 (Schmaltz et al.). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160058498 A1 | Mar 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62042543 | Aug 2014 | US |