This application is a national stage application of International Application No. PCT/FR2013/053218 filed Dec. 20, 2013, which claims priority to French Patent Application No. 1262613 filed Dec. 21, 2012, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference and to which priority is claimed.
The invention relates to a torsional vibration damper intended to be fitted to a torque transmission device. The invention relates more particularly to the field of motor vehicle transmissions.
In the field of motor vehicle transmissions, it is known to provide torque transmission devices with torsional vibration dampers allowing absorption and damping of the vibrations and acyclisms generated by an internal combustion engine.
The vibration dampers comprise an input element and an output element which are rotatable around a common axis of rotation, and elastic damping means for transmitting the torque and damping the rotational acyclisms between the input element and the output element.
Such vibration dampers are used in particular on dual mass flywheels (DVA), clutch friction plates in the case of manual or semiautomatic transmission, or lock-up clutches fitted to hydraulic coupling devices in the case of automatic transmission.
Documents FR 2894006, FR 2913256 and FR 2922620 illustrate vibration dampers fitted respectively to a dual mass flywheel, a clutch friction plate and a lock-up clutch. The elastic damping means used on these vibration dampers are helicoidal springs with circumferential effect, the ends of which come to rest firstly against stops integral with the input elements and secondly against stops integral with the output elements. Thus any rotation of said elements relative to each other causes a compression of the damper springs in one direction or the other, and said compression exerts a return force able to return said elements to a relative angular rest position. The helicoidal springs may be straight or curved.
The stiffness of such a damper is determined as a function of the number of helicoidal springs used therein, the intrinsic stiffness of the springs and the installation diameter of the springs. The choice of stiffness of such vibration dampers results from a compromise between the acyclism filtration efficacy, which increases as the stiffness diminishes, and the capacity to transmit the maximum engine torque without the coils of the springs coming to rest against each other, which requires a sufficient stiffness.
In order to improve the filtration performance for low-torque vibrations, it is known to provide vibration dampers for which the characteristic curve of the torque transmitted as a function of the angular travel has several gradients. Thus at low torque, the stiffness of the damper is less, whereas when approaching the maximum engine torque to be transmitted, the stiffness of the vibration damper is greater. Such a vibration damper is described in particular in document EP 2157336. However, the stiffness change zones cause discontinuities and shocks which are harmful to the quality of the acyclism damping.
Also, as the helicoidal springs are arranged circumferentially, they are extremely susceptible to centrifugal force. Also, the input and/or output elements must be equipped with means allowing the springs to be retained radially and hence prevent their ejection. However these radial retention means introduce parasitic friction, which affects the damping function by blocking the springs when the rotation speed is too high. Attempts have been made to reduce the effect of the parasitic friction by providing complex geometries, surface treatment, or by the introduction of grease. However these measures render production of the vibration dampers more complex and are not therefore totally satisfactory.
Finally, since the space available for the helicoidal springs is limited, the angular travel between the input and output of the vibration damper is also limited, and the helicoidal springs must have a sufficient stiffness to allow transmission of the maximum engine torque.
Thus vibration dampers with helicoidal springs are not totally satisfactory.
The invention proposes to remedy these problems by proposing a vibration damper with improved performance.
To this end, according to a first aspect, the invention concerns a vibration damper for a torque transmission device comprising:
The vibration damper is remarkable in that the elastic damping means comprise an elastic blade mounted securely on the first element and provided with a cam surface; and in that it comprises a cam follower carried by a second element and arranged to cooperate with said cam surface. Also, the cam surface is arranged such that, for an angular travel between the first element and the second element relative to an angular rest position, the cam follower exerts a flexion force on the elastic blade producing a reaction force able to return said first and second elements to said angular rest position.
Therefore the damping means are less susceptible to centrifugal force than the helicoidal springs of the prior art, and their damping capacity is not adversely affected by a high rotation speed of the internal combustion engine.
Also, the structure of such a damper allows relatively large travel paths.
Also, such a damper may have a characteristic curve showing variations in the transmitted torque as a function of the angular travel, in which the gradient variations have no inflection points or discontinuities.
Finally, as the cam surface is carried by the elastic blade, production of a damper according to the invention may be partly standardized. In fact, the geometry and characteristics of the blade only require adaptation when the characteristics of a damper must be adapted to the characteristics of the proposed application, in particular to the maximum engine torque to be transmitted.
According to other advantageous embodiments, such a vibration damper may have one or more of the following characteristics:
According to a second aspect, the invention concerns a torque transmission element, in particular for a motor vehicle, comprising a vibration damper according to the first aspect of the invention.
In one embodiment, the torque transmission element comprises two vibration dampers arranged in series. Such an arrangement allows a further increase in angular travel.
In another embodiment, the torque transmission element comprises two vibration dampers arranged in parallel. Thus the torque transmission element may have a greater torque capacity.
The invention will be better understood, and other objectives, details, characteristics and advantages thereof will arise more clearly from the description below of several particular embodiments of the invention which are given solely for illustration and without limitation, with reference to the attached drawings.
On the drawings:
A torsional vibration damper 14 shown on
The torsional vibration damper 14 comprises an input element 1 and an output element 2 which are arranged, in the transmission train, on the side of an internal combustion engine 10 and on the side of a gearbox 12, respectively, as illustrated in
The input element 1 and output element 2 are rotatable about a common axis of rotation X. The input element and output element 2 are guided in rotation relative to each other by means of a bearing such as a roller bearing 3.
The input element 1 and output element 2 are connected in rotation by damping means. The damping means are able to transmit a torque exceeding 200 N·m, preferably exceeding 300 N·m, (see
The damping means comprise an elastic blade 4. The elastic blade 4 has a free distal end 43 and a connecting portion 44 spaced from the free distal end 43. The connecting portion 44 of the elastic blade 4 is securely (i.e., non-moveably or fixedly) mounted in rotation on the input element 1. At one free end 43, the elastic blade 4 has a cam surface 6 preceding (or anterior to) the free distal end 43 of the elastic blade 4 and arranged to cooperate with a cam follower: a roller 5 mounted on the output element 2. The elastic blade 4 is designed so that it can tolerate high stresses which may amount to 1500 MPa. The elastic blade 4 is for example made of 51CV4 steel which has undergone dedicated heat treatment such as quenching followed by annealing.
The connecting portion 44 of the elastic blade 4 is fixed (i.e., non-moveably coupled) to the input element 1 close to the axis of rotation X. The elastic blade 4 further comprises an arm portion 41 extending substantially radially outwardly from the connecting portion 44 on the input element 1. The arm portion 41 is extended via an elbow by a curved portion 42 adjacent to the connecting portion 44. The curved portion 42 extends substantially circumferentially. As illustrated in
The roller 5 is mounted rotatably on the output element 2 around the axis of rotation 7. The roller 5 is held resting against the cam surface 6 and is arranged to roll against said cam surface 6 on a relative movement between the input element 1 and the output element 2. The roller 5 is arranged radially outside the cam surface 6 so as to hold the elastic blade 4 radially when it is subjected to centrifugal force. In order to reduce the parasitic friction liable to affect the damping function, the roller 5 is mounted in rotation on the output element 2 by means of a roller bearing. For example, the roller bearing may be a ball bearing or a roller bearing. In one embodiment, the roller 5 has an antifriction coating.
The cam surface 6 is arranged such that, for an angular travel between the input element and the output element to either side of this relative angular rest position, the roller 5 moves on the cam surface 6 and by doing so, exerts a flexion force on the elastic blade 4. In reaction, the cam surface 6 exerts a return force on the roller 5 which tries to bring the input element 1 and output element 2 back to their relative angular rest position.
The function of the vibration damper will now be explained in relation to
When a driving motor torque is transmitted from the input element 1 to the output element 2 (direct direction), the torque to be transmitted causes a relative travel between the input element 1 and the output element 2 in a first direction (see
The flexion force P depends in particular on the geometry of the blade and its material, in particular its modulus of transverse elasticity. The flexion force P breaks down into a radial component Pr and a tangential component Pt. The tangential component Pt allows transmission of the engine torque. In reaction, the elastic blade 4 exerts a reaction force on the roller 5, the tangential component of which constitutes a return force which tries to bring the input element 1 and output element 2 back to their relative angular rest position.
When a resistant torque is transmitted from the output element 2 to the input element 2 (reverse direction), the torque to be transmitted causes a relative travel between the input element 1 and the output element 2 in a second opposite direction (see
The torsional vibrations and the torque irregularities produced by the internal combustion engine are transmitted by the drive shaft to the input element 1, and also generate relative rotations between the input element 1 and output element 2. These vibrations and irregularities are damped by the flexion of the elastic blade 4.
Advantageously, the cam surface 6 and the elastic blade 4 are arranged such that the characteristic function of the torque transmitted as a function of the angular travel is a monotonous function.
Also, the cam surface 6 and the elastic blade 4 are arranged such that the transmissible torque is greater than the maximum engine torque when the roller 5 reaches the two ends of the cam track 4.
For certain applications, the cam surface 6 and the elastic blade 4 may be arranged such that the characteristics of the torque transmitted as a function of the angular travel in the reverse direction and in the direct direction are symmetrical relative to the angular rest position.
In one embodiment (not illustrated), a torque transmission element according to the invention is fitted with two dampers as described above, arranged in series.
In another embodiment (not illustrated), a torque transmission element is fitted with two dampers as described above, arranged in parallel.
Although the invention has been described in connection with several particular embodiments, it is evident that it is in no way limited to this and comprises all technical equivalents of the means described and their combinations where these fall within the scope of the invention. In particular, it is evident that although, in the embodiment described above, the elastic blade is mounted securely on the input element and the cam follower is mounted on the output element, the elastic blade may equally well be mounted on the output element while the cam follower is mounted on the input element.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
12 62613 | Dec 2012 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2013/053218 | 12/20/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/096735 | 6/26/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2551718 | Auten | May 1951 | A |
2837902 | Stevens | Jun 1958 | A |
4145936 | Vincent et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4300363 | Mathues | Nov 1981 | A |
4378220 | Seppala | Mar 1983 | A |
4488629 | Loizeau | Dec 1984 | A |
4646899 | Murakami | Mar 1987 | A |
4703840 | Bopp | Nov 1987 | A |
4718530 | Loizeau et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4795012 | Durum | Jan 1989 | A |
4800996 | Loizeau | Jan 1989 | A |
5066147 | Brandenstein et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5205788 | Sacher et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5477950 | Maloof | Dec 1995 | A |
5697261 | Mokdad et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5823311 | Mokdad | Oct 1998 | A |
5893355 | Glover et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5908095 | Jaeckel et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6073503 | Matsuno | Jun 2000 | A |
6176785 | Geislinger | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6224487 | Yuergens | May 2001 | B1 |
6398655 | Orlamunder et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6471024 | Ota | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6585091 | Reinhart et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
8202183 | Riu | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8257211 | Riu | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8689952 | Toshihisa | Apr 2014 | B2 |
20010032767 | Reinhart et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020052242 | Tabuchi et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20030106763 | Kimura et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030226734 | Uehara | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20080171604 | Chaudhari et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20100122605 | Maienschein | May 2010 | A1 |
20170234400 | Fenioux | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170363195 | Durham | Dec 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19538722 | Apr 1997 | DE |
19721236 | Dec 1997 | DE |
19729421 | Jan 1998 | DE |
19808730 | Sep 1999 | DE |
19919449 | Nov 1999 | DE |
10017801 | Oct 2001 | DE |
102004024747 | Dec 2005 | DE |
102008018218 | Nov 2008 | DE |
102009050670 | May 2010 | DE |
102010047803 | Apr 2011 | DE |
102010049929 | May 2011 | DE |
1048420 | Nov 2000 | EP |
1195536 | Apr 2002 | EP |
1691107 | Aug 2006 | EP |
2157336 | Feb 2010 | EP |
2530354 | Dec 2012 | EP |
2339107 | Aug 1977 | FR |
2493446 | May 1982 | FR |
2499182 | Aug 1982 | FR |
2546251 | Nov 1984 | FR |
2602560 | Feb 1988 | FR |
2611013 | Aug 1988 | FR |
2628804 | Sep 1989 | FR |
2714435 | Jun 1995 | FR |
2738606 | Mar 1997 | FR |
2752278 | Feb 1998 | FR |
2764958 | Dec 1998 | FR |
2768208 | Mar 1999 | FR |
2823275 | Oct 2002 | FR |
2828543 | Feb 2003 | FR |
2838490 | Oct 2003 | FR |
2828543 | Feb 2004 | FR |
2843432 | Feb 2004 | FR |
2862730 | May 2005 | FR |
2894006 | Jun 2007 | FR |
2913256 | Sep 2008 | FR |
2922620 | Apr 2009 | FR |
2938030 | May 2010 | FR |
1212042 | Nov 1970 | GB |
2000257 | Jan 1979 | GB |
2169380 | Jul 1986 | GB |
2235749 | Mar 1991 | GB |
2262795 | Jun 1993 | GB |
2289558 | May 1995 | GB |
2284875 | Jun 1995 | GB |
2306620 | May 1997 | GB |
2331132 | May 1999 | GB |
2338773 | Jul 2002 | GB |
2468030 | Aug 2010 | GB |
9280317 | Oct 1997 | JP |
2000192992 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2011047462 | Mar 2011 | JP |
WO199528580 | Oct 1995 | WO |
WO9914114 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO9941525 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO2004016968 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO2006070422 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO2007000140 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO2008004257 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO2008004258 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO2009047816 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO2011006264 | Jan 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Translation of FR 2828543. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150369296 A1 | Dec 2015 | US |