The present invention relates generally to noise and vibration absorption and more particularly, to vibration damper for mitigating noise and vibration.
Unwanted noise and vibration is common in many environments. Although such noise and vibration can be tolerated in some cases, in many situations it cannot thus requiring structures and/or equipment to be isolated from the sources of noise and vibration. For example, in many circumstances, noise is generated on horizontal surfaces such as floors due to various, impacts. This noise often propagates into surrounding structures creating undesirable noise and vibration pollution. In commercial environments, large commercial and industrial machinery and equipment, which vibrates during use, often results in impact and/or vibrational noise passing through the floor and into adjacent structures. In residential environments, exercise equipment such as treadmills, Jacuzzi tubs, whirlpool baths and hot tubs, which vibrate during use, result in impact and/or vibrational noise passing into adjacent structures. In environments where sensitive measurement or high-tolerance equipment such as MRI devices and CNC machines is operating, it is necessary to isolate such equipment from vibration to ensure accurate and proper operation.
Techniques to dampen noise and vibration have of course been considered, and many different types of vibration mitigating mats and pads to absorb vibration exist. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,796,096 to Heath discloses an impact absorbing surface covering for high traffic areas. The impact absorbing surface covering includes a shock pad of recycled closed cell foam and an impervious wear surface thereon.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,002,315 to Van Goubergen discloses a vibration damper in the form of a stackable mat formed of dampening material. Projections are provided on the upper and lower surfaces of the mat.
Also, floating floors to accommodate vibration and/or structure shifts and settling exist. Unfortunately, to-date these solutions to deal with unwanted noise and vibration have proven either to be inadequate, too expensive and/or too complicated. As will be appreciated, there exists a need for an effective, simple and inexpensive noise and vibration dampening device.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a novel vibration damper.
Accordingly, in one aspect there is provided a vibration damper comprising a vibration dampening structure and a load bearing plate disposed on the vibration dampening structure.
In one embodiment, the load bearing plate is a steel plate adhered to the vibration dampening structure. The vibration dampening structure includes a layer of slip resistant material and at least one layer of foam material disposed between the slip resistant layer and the load bearing plate. The layer of slip resistant material is formed of recycled bound rubber product and has a contoured bottom surface. The contoured bottom surface has variations in thickness and comprises an array of peaks and valleys giving the bottom surface an “egg-crate” appearance.
The at least one layer of foam material may include two or more layers of foam material, with each layer of foam material having a different density. The density characteristics of the foam layers are chosen depending on the nature of the load to be supported by the vibration damper. As loads increase, more dense foam material is used.
According to another aspect there is provided a vibration damper comprising a slip resistant layer having a contoured bottom surface, at least one layer of foam material disposed on a surface of the slip resistant layer opposite the bottom surface, and a load bearing plate disposed on the foam layer.
According to yet another aspect there is provided a floating floor comprising a generally planar sheet of flooring, and a plurality of vibration dampers acting between the sheet of flooring and an underlying floor surface at spaced locations. At least of the vibration dampers comprises a vibration dampening structure and a load bearing plate on the vibration dampening structure. The vibration dampening structure has a bottom surface to contact the floor surface.
In one embodiment, each vibration damper comprises a vibration dampening structure and a load bearing plate. The vibration dampening structure comprises a non-slip layer defining the bottom surface and at least one foam layer acting between the non-slip layer and the load bearing plate.
According to still yet another aspect there is provided a floating floor section comprising a generally planar sheet of flooring, and a plurality of vibration dampers secured to the sheet of flooring at spaced locations. Each vibration damper comprising a vibration dampening structure and a load bearing plate, thereon. The vibration dampening structure defines a bottom surface to contact an underlying floor surface on which the floating floor section is to be mounted. The load bearing plate is positioned adjacent the sheet of flooring.
The vibration damper effectively absorbs noise and vibration, is inexpensive to manufacture and is easy to install and use. When used beneath vibrating equipment, the vibration damper virtually eliminates noise and vibration from propagating to surrounding structures. When used beneath sensitive measurement and high-tolerance equipment, the vibration damper effectively inhibits vibration generated in the surrounding environment from propagating to the equipment supported by the vibration damper.
Embodiments will now be described more fully with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
Turning now to
As can be seen, vibration damper 10 includes a load bearing plate 12 disposed on a vibration dampening structure 14. The vibration dampening structure 14 in this example includes a slip resistant lower layer 16 and a pair of intermediate foam layers 18 and 20 disposed between the lower layer 16 and the load bearing plate 12.
The bottom surface 22 of the lower layer 16 is contoured to define peaks 24 and valleys 26 that are sequentially alternated in a three-dimensional array giving the bottom surface 22 an “egg-crate” appearance. The depth and pitch of the peaks 24 and valleys 26 i.e. its geometry, is selected to give the vibration damper 10 a desired dynamic compression characteristic resulting in the vibration damper 10 undergoing a desired amount of compressive deflection under a given dynamic load. This dynamic compressive deflection characteristic serves to mitigate transfer of structure borne or impact noise. Sharp and long peaks 24 and valleys 26 offer greater dynamic compression or deflection under relatively small loads while wide and short peaks 24 and valleys 26 result in less dynamic compression or deflection under relatively larger loads. The contour of the bottom surface 22 also provides enhanced slip-resistance thereby to inhibit sliding of the vibration damper 10 relative to the support surface on which the vibration damper 10 rests.
The lower layer 16 is formed of recycled bound rubber product. During the manufacturing process, Styrenebutadiene Rubber (SBR) and natural rubber are mixed with polyurethane and cured under moderate temperature. Although the lower layer 16 typically has a large percentage of SBR rubber therein, the lower layer 16 can be made entirely of SBR rubber, other rubbers or a combination thereof.
Each intermediate foam layer 18, 20 is formed of polyetherurethane foam and has a different density. Typically the lower foam layer 18 is more dense than the upper foam layer 20. The densities of the foam layers are dependent on the environment in which the vibration damper 10 is being used. In cases where the vibration damper 10 is to be subjected to high loads, higher density foam layers are used. Generally, the density of the foam layers 18, 20 and the contour of the bottom surface 22 are selected so that for the intended environment, the vibration damper 10 provides the desired load deflection and vibration insulation while exhibiting the desired dynamic and static stiffness. Foam densities in the range from about 120 kg/m3 to 1000 kg/m3 have been found to be suitable for most applications.
The load bearing plate 12 is formed of steel and can be powder coated if desired. A small resilient mount pad 30 formed of polyetherurethane foam material is centrally disposed on the load bearing plate 12 to provide a non-slip mount surface for the equipment supported by the vibration damper 10.
The lower and intermediate layers 16 to 20 are assembled either through a lamination machine or through a machine that mechanically or chemically bonds the layers, together to form the vibration dampening structure 14. Once the vibration dampening structure 14 is complete, the load bearing plate 12 and mount pad 30 are adhered to or otherwise bonded to the vibration dampening structure 14 to complete the vibration damper 10.
In use, one or more vibration dampers 10 are placed between the equipment and support surface on which the equipment rests at appropriate locations i.e. under the feet and/or support surfaces of the equipment. The vibration dampers are typically not fixed or adhered to the support surface. The peaks 24, which contact the support surface, provide an effective non-slip surface even in wet conditions. The mount pads 30 on the load bearing plates 12 provide suitable mounts for the equipment. With the density of the foam layers 18, 20 properly selected in view of the particular environment, equipment vibration is effectively absorbed by the vibration dampers 10 inhibiting the vibration from propagating to surrounding structures. Also, vibration in the surrounding environment is absorbed by the vibration dampers 10 thereby to isolate equipment supported on the vibration dampers therefrom.
Although the vibration damper 10 is described as including a vibration dampening structure 14 with three layers 16, 18 and 20, other layer configurations can of course be used. For example, the vibration damper 10 can be constructed to include one or three or more intermediate foam layers. Of course other types of foam layers or layers of other suitable material can be used.
The vibration damper may be used in commercial and industrial applications as well as in residential applications. In commercial and industrial environments, the vibration damper 10 may be placed beneath machines and equipment such as HVAC compressors, fans, pumps and blowers that vibrate during use thereby to inhibit the transfer of machine and equipment vibration to surrounding structures. In residential environments, the vibration damper may be used between exercise equipment such as treadmills, Jacuzzi tubs, whirlpool baths, hot tubs etc. to inhibit the transfer of impact noise and/or vibration to surrounding structure. In noise sensitive environments, the vibration damper may be used between sensitive measurement and high-tolerance equipment such as for example MRI devices and CNC machines to isolate the sensitive measurement and high-tolerance equipment from vibration generated in the surrounding environment.
The vibration damper 10 can take basically any desired size. It has been found that 4″ by 6″ vibration dampers are suitable to support loads in the range of from about 50 lbs to 400 lbs, 5″ by 7″ vibration dampers are suitable to support loads in the range of from about 100 lbs to 1,000 lbs and 6″ by 14″ vibration dampers are suitable to support loads in the range of from about 100 lbs to 2500 lbs.
As will be appreciated by those of skill in the art, the vibration dampers need not directly support equipment. Rather, the vibration dampers can be used to support floor panels on which equipment is to rest. In this manner, the vibration dampers space the floor panels on which the equipment rests from the underlying structure floor creating a floating floor for the equipment. Pre-fabricated ready-to-install floating floor sections, each comprising a plurality of vibration dampers adhered or otherwise secured to a floor panel such as a plywood sheet at spaced locations can be constructed allowing larger floating floors incorporating the vibration dampers to be quickly and easily installed.
Although embodiments of the vibration damper have been described above with reference to the drawings, those of skill in the art will appreciate that variations and modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope thereof as defined by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/120,062, filed May 2, 2005 now abandoned. The subject matter of the aforementioned application is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
205271 | Hyatt | Jun 1878 | A |
1554179 | Trader | Sep 1925 | A |
1940105 | Schmid | Dec 1933 | A |
2001916 | Mazer | May 1935 | A |
2077617 | Cramer | Apr 1937 | A |
2270902 | Rubissow | Jan 1942 | A |
2288054 | Walton | Jun 1942 | A |
2290622 | Carter | Jul 1942 | A |
2337525 | Peik | Dec 1943 | A |
2665848 | Smith et al. | Jan 1954 | A |
2768091 | Cubberley | Oct 1956 | A |
2821254 | Kernen | Jan 1958 | A |
2862255 | Nelson | Dec 1958 | A |
2940887 | Daly et al. | Jun 1960 | A |
2961029 | Rainar | Nov 1960 | A |
3026224 | Rogers, Jr. | Mar 1962 | A |
3160549 | Caldwell et al. | Dec 1964 | A |
3311331 | Steimen | Mar 1967 | A |
3345245 | Hanusa | Oct 1967 | A |
3399103 | Salyer et al. | Aug 1968 | A |
3418812 | Khan et al. | Dec 1968 | A |
3567563 | Haudenchild et al. | Mar 1971 | A |
3579941 | Tibbals | May 1971 | A |
3641855 | Balle | Feb 1972 | A |
3770560 | Elder et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
3893619 | Bruner | Jul 1975 | A |
3917501 | Ferrucci et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
3924907 | Czernik et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
3948009 | Bernhard | Apr 1976 | A |
3985198 | Kurtze et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4002315 | Van Goubergen | Jan 1977 | A |
4060502 | Benton | Nov 1977 | A |
4112176 | Bailey | Sep 1978 | A |
4143495 | Hintz | Mar 1979 | A |
4179067 | Baier | Dec 1979 | A |
4190131 | Robinson | Feb 1980 | A |
4242391 | Reinhardt et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4244841 | Frankland | Jan 1981 | A |
4265398 | Luebke | May 1981 | A |
4428454 | Capaul et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4457120 | Takata | Jul 1984 | A |
4500037 | Braitsch et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4551362 | Harms et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4566231 | Konsevich | Jan 1986 | A |
4637942 | Tomarin | Jan 1987 | A |
4672100 | Schonbachler et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4681786 | Brown | Jul 1987 | A |
4685259 | Eberhart et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4694627 | Omholt | Sep 1987 | A |
4696429 | Ortwein | Sep 1987 | A |
4720043 | Ortwein | Jan 1988 | A |
4753841 | Noel et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4755408 | Noel | Jul 1988 | A |
4771944 | Brister et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4803112 | Kakimoto et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4851500 | Lalwani et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4860506 | Yoshimi et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4888927 | Yoshimi et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4910935 | Leukel et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4917932 | McClung | Apr 1990 | A |
4945697 | Ott et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4957798 | Bogdany | Sep 1990 | A |
4967529 | L'Heureux | Nov 1990 | A |
5016413 | Counihan | May 1991 | A |
5060856 | Ortwein | Oct 1991 | A |
5096772 | Snyder | Mar 1992 | A |
5110660 | Wolf et al. | May 1992 | A |
5183438 | Blom | Feb 1993 | A |
5187905 | Pourtau et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5258222 | Crivelli | Nov 1993 | A |
5383314 | Rothberg | Jan 1995 | A |
5424099 | Stewart et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5438171 | Schmanski | Aug 1995 | A |
5439735 | Jamison | Aug 1995 | A |
5472750 | Miller | Dec 1995 | A |
5482754 | Crook | Jan 1996 | A |
5487501 | Engst et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5527409 | Lanphier | Jun 1996 | A |
5572842 | Stief et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5584950 | Gaffigan | Dec 1996 | A |
5619832 | Myrvold | Apr 1997 | A |
5653099 | MacKenzie | Aug 1997 | A |
5714219 | Mashunkashey et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5721035 | Dunn | Feb 1998 | A |
5738279 | Ihle et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5744763 | Iwasa et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5766721 | Bussey, Jr. et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5851338 | Pushaw | Dec 1998 | A |
5867957 | Holtrop | Feb 1999 | A |
5873936 | Ogden | Feb 1999 | A |
5879781 | Mehta et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5956921 | Fleck et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6077613 | Gaffigan | Jun 2000 | A |
6182413 | Magnusson | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6212838 | Eda | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6213252 | Ducharme | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224707 | Lion | May 2001 | B1 |
6235367 | Holmes et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6251493 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256955 | Lolley et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6291048 | Jerdee et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6372069 | Walls | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6386461 | Wildgoose | May 2002 | B1 |
6427925 | Gaudet | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6468631 | Pahl et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6481637 | McQueen | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6541105 | Park | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6595321 | Tompson | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6602586 | Kakimoto et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6708896 | Robinson | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6723413 | Walters | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6769834 | Stange | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6796096 | Heath | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6920723 | Downey | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6945007 | Kobayashi et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6990703 | Brown et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7055649 | Tompson et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7080712 | Tsuiki et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7096630 | Keene et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7166678 | Dunlap et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7182994 | Scott | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7263028 | Thomas et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7265178 | Maier et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7278588 | English et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7331534 | McQueen | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7464791 | Cooksey et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7566374 | Brazier et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7730684 | Keene | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7730685 | Keene | Jun 2010 | B1 |
RE41945 | Downey | Nov 2010 | E |
20010052550 | Janssens | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020005250 | Jerdee et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020040079 | Lee et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020088193 | Reimers et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020119716 | Santhosh | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030040405 | Watterson et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030102184 | Brisson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040050482 | Abrams | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040096645 | Hancy et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040123555 | Cole | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040127614 | Jiang et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040202854 | Esparza | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050031829 | Crenshaw et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050032447 | Tachibana et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050037174 | Streeton et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050126848 | Siavoshai et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050282465 | McNab | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060008612 | Brazier et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060016635 | Downey | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060024453 | Setser et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060037815 | Schabel, Jr. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060105136 | Brazier et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060156663 | Mao | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060165950 | Dodge, III | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167206 | Maier et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060189750 | Maier et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060191743 | Pike, Sr. et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060205869 | Steidl et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060230699 | Keene | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070004306 | Leeser et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070172629 | Dodge | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070261365 | Keene | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080010930 | Mao | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090283658 | Keene | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100229486 | Keene | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110107700 | Keene | May 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
41 41 023 | Jun 1993 | DE |
199 32 991 | Jun 2000 | DE |
0 916 629 | May 1999 | EP |
0 982 444 | Mar 2000 | EP |
1 447 495 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1 739 253 | Jan 2007 | EP |
1 757 75081 | Apr 2010 | EP |
2 824 094 | Oct 2002 | FR |
841 867 | Jul 1960 | GB |
1 120 827 | Jul 1968 | GB |
2 379 934 | Mar 2003 | GB |
2 437 180 | Oct 2007 | GB |
48014737 | Jan 1974 | JP |
8-297492 | Nov 1996 | JP |
WO-8302127 | Jun 1983 | WO |
WO-8700828 | Feb 1987 | WO |
WO-9312283 | Jun 1993 | WO |
WO-9966144 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO-0155530 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO-0235025 | May 2002 | WO |
WO-02094550 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO-2004031501 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO-2004058416 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO-2006131138 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO-2007015081 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO-2007082339 | Jul 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090072457 A1 | Mar 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11120062 | May 2005 | US |
Child | 12325960 | US |