The present disclosure relates to damping sound and vibration in large hollow golf club heads by providing a damper between the sole and top wall or crown of such golf clubs.
Currently, large, hollow metal driver-type golf club heads typically generate a strong and often objectionable, sharp ringing sound immediately after impact of a face of the club head on a ball. When hollow metal heads first became available, they were often filled with a vibration-damping foam material. This added unwanted weight. What was worse, because of its lack of rigidity, the added weight of the foam did not participate fully in the impact. This caused reduced driving distance. More recently with even larger heads of this type, the ringing sound was allowed by club head designers, even with the objection of some golfers.
Test have shown that the impact of a ball on the club face of a typical modern hollow golf club head produces an amplitude of vibration of the crown (top wall) and sole (bottom wall) of the head such that the crown-sole distance expands about 0.02 inch during and immediately following impact. This causes a predominately crown-sole oscillation that persists for the order of one second and emits a sharp sound in the range of about 1000 to 5000 thousand cycles per second. This is in the general frequency range of maximum audible sensation to the ears of typical humans. The stiffness for a force tending to reduce the crown-sole distance was found to be about 2000 pounds of force per inch of deformation. Because peak forces on the club face at impact are in the range of 2500 pounds, the club head must be designed to have far greater stiffness for face-rear vibrations than the 2000 pounds per inch of crown-sole stiffness. For this reason, oscillations in the face-rear direction are far smaller, higher frequency, and emit much less audible sound.
Thus, reducing vibrations in the crown-sole direction is important for overall sound reduction. Vibrations in the face-rear direction are relatively unimportant. The damping structure should add fewer than about 2 grams of mass, because such mass may not significantly participate in the impact.
Vibration damping methods are widely known in the field of mechanical vibrations. When there is no damping, vibrations are not diminished and continue indefinitely. When viscous damping (damping force proportional to deformation velocity) is present, it may be small, with vibrations dying out slowly, or if larger, dying more rapidly. There is an amount of viscous damping called critical damping, which causes the vibrations to cease. More damping simply causes initial motion to cease more slowly but with no vibration. To reduce sound, damping is preferably in the range of about five times critical damping to one fifth of critical damping. The latter case allows vibrations but they diminish rapidly.
Viscous damping may be provided by liquids or semi-liquids that experience shear deformation. Many somewhat flexible solids may be deformed, but do not return quickly to their original shapes and approximate viscous damping in some respects.
As an alternate to the viscous damping discussed above, dry sliding friction may be used. That is the drag force when 2 flat surfaces of solids that are pressed together are caused to slide relatively to one another. This can effectively suppress continued vibrations when the drag force is suitable.
Finally, it is to be noted that all solids provide a degree of internal damping when stressed, ranging from extremely slight (hard steel for example) to quite large (some types of rubber for example). Thus in principle all structures stressed in tension, compression or shear have at least a slight degree of damping. In the present disclosure, damping materials include viscous liquids, those solids having large damping properties such as for some kinds of rubber, certain elastomeric plastics, and dry sliding friction.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,429,365 (McKeigen) shows a post member that joins a club head crown to its sole. This changes the fundamental (i.e. lowest) mode of vibration frequency to become much higher. That effect could eliminate sound only by raising the lowest vibration mode to a frequency above the audible range, which is unlikely. The purpose of the post is to join parts of the club head together.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,890,973 (Gamble) shows various face-rear members to influence behavior of the face upon impact. In one form shown in
Those skilled in the field of vibrations will recognize that the configurations illustrated in the '973 patent may provide a degree of damping of face-rear vibrations, but are much less effective for reducing vibrations in the crown-sole direction than the configurations defined in this invention. The basic reason is that the present invention provides vibration damping effects directly on the important parts that cause most of the sound generation, namely the crown and sole.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,316,298 (Hutin et al.) and 5,586,947 (Hutin) show means for damping vibrations in golf club heads in which a visco-elastic layer is applied to the vibrating surface with an outer layer of more rigid material. While damping is obtained in this manner, the layered wall structure is very distinct from the present disclosure.
The present disclosure provides damping coupling structure between the crown or top wall of a hollow metal golf club head and the sole or bottom wall.
The vibrations of a club head mostly make sound when the larger surfaces vibrate, principally when there is motion in the crown-sole mode (the crown bulging upward while the sole bulges downward and the reverse). This generates sound due to the broad surface areas of the crown wall and sole, because this is normally the lowest-frequency mode of vibration of a club head, and is excited by the transient forces of impact of the ball on the club head face. Small areas generate less sound than large areas.
In various embodiments shown, physical damping connections are provided between the crown and sole, which have the large surfaces of the hollow golf club head that are the source of most vibration and noise.
Damping structures disclosed include viscous liquids, solids having large damping properties, such as some kinds of rubber; certain elastomeric plastics and dry sliding friction.
Structural elements having such damping properties provide damping directly between the walls that cause the most sound generation, namely the crown and the sole.
The dotted lines 5 illustrate the basic mode of crown-sole vibration of the hollow driver head 1, immediately after impact by a ball on the face 7. These vibrations and deflections of the crown and sole cause a sound that can be heard by a golfer. Relatively slight face-rear movement (not shown) accompanies this vibration.
Either the tube 24 or rod 26 may extend from crown to sole and may be attached to the sole or crown 15 by anchoring by bonding or otherwise on the inner surface of the crown wall or sole wall or in a hole in the wall as in
A small amount of bonding material shown at 53 may be used at the periphery or edge of material layer 51, to secure the material 51 to the inner surfaces of the crown (or sole). The other portions of the damping material 51 may separate momentarily from the inner surface of crown 15 during a vibration, as indicated at dotted line 56, but the bonding attachment at 53 keeps the tubular member 50 and material 51 in place. The layer or patch 51 is selected in size to provide some movement in the center during vibration, but yet hold the tube 50 in place. As shown, the patch 51 may be round or square and with a diameter or side length in face to rear wall direction about 2 times the diameter of tube 50.
The bond for the patch of material 51 is applied only in selected locations, as shown only at 53, so that if the crown moves away from the vibration damper tube, the patch of material 51 can flex as indicated by dotted lines 56, without breaking the bond. While only one bond location 53 is shown, there may be more than one and if the patch of damping material 51 has adequate diameter or size, and low enough stiffness, the bonding to the crown (or sole) could be in the form of a peripheral bond along the outer edge of the patch of material 51.
The lowest resonant frequency of the internal crown-sole column or member disclosed for vibrations in the face-rear direction, which is the direction transverse to the long axis of the column or member, and which is called the transverse mode of vibration, should be above 2000 Hz. Preferably the lowest resonant frequency in the transverse mode is well above 2000 Hz, for example 4000 Hz or more, so that ball-face impact does not cause excessive vibration of the internal crown-sole column or member in the face-rear direction relative to the club head.
The cross sectional shape of tubes or columns shown does not have to be circular, but may be of other shapes. A rectangular shape or I-beam shape could be used so that the stiffness in the face-rear direction is high enough to minimize face-rear deformation of member 50 during the short time of ball-face impact.
In the embodiment shown in
A calculated example, for a tube 60 of durometer about 55 A polyurethane with Young's modulus of 100,000 pounds per square inch, density of 1.2 grams/cubic centimeter, outside diameter of ⅜ inch, inside diameter of 5/16 inch and length of 1.5 inches, indicates the tube has a lowest resonant frequency of 2500 to 5000 Hz. The resonant frequency depends in part on how firmly the ends of the tube 60 are attached to the sole and crown. This range of lowest resonant frequencies would be satisfactory, but a lowest resonant frequency higher than this range is desirable. If the lowest resonant frequency in bending is much below this range, tube 60 is subject to excessive transverse vibrations at ball impact in the face-rear direction that would cause its mass to not fully participate in the impact, resulting in slightly less distance of a golf shot, and the damping capability of the tube 60 may be diminished. The above example of ⅜ inch outside diameter tubing weighs about 1.0. gram. The tubular configuration is thus preferable to a solid cylinder. The tube need not have a round cross section.
It is noted that use of 2 or more of the various damping structures described above may be positioned approximately as desired for best damping.
The embodiment of
In any case, suitable damping can be satisfactorily estimated by analytical methods, but experiments are generally necessary to make sure that suitable damping and durability are achieved. Fortunately, the level of damping may vary substantially with acceptable results.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1658581 | Tobia | Feb 1928 | A |
4067572 | Coleman | Jan 1978 | A |
4313607 | Thompson | Feb 1982 | A |
4432549 | Zebelean | Feb 1984 | A |
4438931 | Motomiya | Mar 1984 | A |
4535990 | Yamada | Aug 1985 | A |
4602787 | Sugioka et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4681321 | Chen et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4775156 | Thompson | Oct 1988 | A |
4811949 | Kobayashi | Mar 1989 | A |
4944515 | Shearer | Jul 1990 | A |
5000454 | Soda | Mar 1991 | A |
5064197 | Eddy | Nov 1991 | A |
5316298 | Hutin et al. | May 1994 | A |
5429365 | McKeighen | Jul 1995 | A |
5431396 | Shieh | Jul 1995 | A |
5464211 | Atkins | Nov 1995 | A |
5467983 | Chen | Nov 1995 | A |
5586947 | Hutin | Dec 1996 | A |
5873791 | Allen | Feb 1999 | A |
5890973 | Gamble | Apr 1999 | A |
5941782 | Cook | Aug 1999 | A |
6332849 | Beasley | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6524197 | Boone | Feb 2003 | B2 |
20060135283 | Billings | Jun 2006 | A1 |