This invention relates to nock constructions for use with crossbows and more particularly to a vibration damping insert for reinforced nocks to absorb bow string slap.
As shown in U.S. Patent Application Nos. 61/748,526 filed Jan. 3, 2013; 61/621,221 filed Apr. 6, 2012; and Ser. No. 13/785,862 filed Mar. 5, 2013; nocks usable with crossbows have been reinforced utilizing a metal support structure which surrounds a portion of a nock and a portion of the crossbow bolt to attempt to prevent fracture of the nock when the bolt is fired from the crossbow. It is noted that all of these patent applications are incorporated in their entirety by reference.
Whether the crossbow nock is lighted or unlighted in general crossbows have a significant safety problem in that crossbows are designed such that the string has some slight separation from the projectile prior to firing of the projectile upon release of the bow string. From a physics perspective the string travels forward and actually impacts or slaps the nock rather than pushing on the nock.
Nocks in general are plastic and existing plastic nock systems are problematic if the nock breaks. This can result in what is called a dry fire with the string moving forward without pushing on the projectile because the nock has broken or fractured. The result is that the string slides over the projectile. When this happens there is nothing to absorb all of the stored energy. Thus when the string is released all of the energy reverberates back into the bow which can cause damage to the bow itself.
As will be appreciated, in a dry fire situation in which the nock is fractured the energy is not put into the projectile but rather is put back into the bow where it can actually cause portions of the bow to break and detach, becoming a serious safety problem for the hunter or archer.
Metal nocks are known in the industry, although not used as commonly as plastic nocks. However, the metal nocks are solid and have no ability to be lighted. Lighting of nocks has proven to be a valuable means for the hunter or archer to easily track the trajectory of the projectile to correct shooting errors, and to locate the projectile after shooting. Additionally, the solid metal nocks do not have the ability to reduce the impact from the bow string, and can therefore cause unwanted vibration in the crossbow.
As a result and for crossbows in particular there is a significant need to be able to provide a plastic nock that is reinforced with either metal, a ceramic or an advanced composite that has the structural strength and ability to absorb the impact of the bow string. As mentioned above there are metal support structures that cooperate with the plastic nocks that to a certain extent limit the fracture or damage of the nock during crossbow firing. It will be appreciated that the amount of stress produced in the nock from the energy in the crossbow is over 7,000 psi.
Should the nock break or fracture not only is the bow string released with no retarding force such as would be associated with the bolt or projectile, the arrow itself can fly off at any angle thus potentially causing injury to the hunter or those nearby.
It is therefore important to be able to provide a nock structure capable of withstanding tremendous forces associated with the release of a crossbow string, the need being both for unlighted nocks and lighted nocks alike.
It will be appreciated that lighted nocks are activated when the bow string presses on a plunger which in turn presses on an internal light emitting diode assembly to close a switch between the light emitting diode and a battery pack contained within the bolt or arrow shaft. When the bow string is released the plunger is pushed in and the internal light is activated to provide a lighted nock that is used by the hunter to trace the path of the arrow and also to be able to find the arrow if it has missed its target. This in turn permits retrieval of the arrow for a missed shot.
In the case of lighted nocks a clear plastic is utilized for the nock construction so that light that is generated internal to the bolt or arrow shaft is radiated out from the lighted nock. It is therefore important to provide a lighted nock which is capable of sustaining the tremendous forces associated with the release of a crossbow bow string.
Not only is a fracture resistant nock important for lighted nocks it is likewise important for unlighted nocks. In addition to the reasons stated above, it is beneficial to have a shock absorbing elastomeric material as part of the construction of any nock, lighted or unlighted, to reduce vibration in the crossbow and bolt.
In order to prevent fracture of a nock, lighted or not, in the subject invention the distal portion of the nock is provided with a shock absorber insert that in essence absorbs the impact forces so that the nock will not shatter due to the slap of the bow string against the nock. An additional benefit of the system is the overall reduction in vibration in the system which tends to increase accuracy, reduce noise and improve overall shooting enjoyment from a smoother feel to the shooter.
In a preferred embodiment the nock is encased in the aforementioned metal support structure. However the distal end of the nock is provided with the shock absorbing material, in one case TPU or thermopolymer urethane or thermoplastic urethane as it is sometimes called. In one embodiment, the TPU shock absorber is injection molded into an aluminum housing and absorbs the impact to prevent the nock from breaking or shattering during firing, especially when there is a space between the bow string and the distal end of the nock causing a high impact slap against the nock that otherwise might cause the nock to fracture.
The preferred material for the shock absorber at the distal end of the nock is clear TPU. From a structural perspective the TPU allows some resilience and therefore vibration damping. As a result the slap from the string will be damped. It is noted that urethane has extremely good impact absorption characteristics, and is a material commonly used for skate wheels. It also has good absorption resistance as well as good impact absorption characteristics. Since the TPU is preferably clear, it allows a lighted nock to not only have the structural benefits from this insert but will also allow a light from a light assembly to exit to the rear of the bolt or arrow shaft when a battery and LED assembly is located at the proximal portion of the TPU insert.
Moreover, when the TPU insert is impacted by the bow string it moves slightly forward in the structural housing such that rather than having to utilize a plunger or pin to push the LED light emitting unit forward to make switch contact, the TPU insert itself forms a plunger like function that moves upon impact to push the end of a dome-shaped LED forward in the bolt or arrow shaft, whereupon traditional switch contact is made to illuminate the LED.
It is preferable to use injection moldable urethane as opposed to a castable urethane or a two part urethane. This is important because injection moldable TPU urethanes are stronger and more impact resistant than castable urethanes. Note first and foremost TPU must have the requisite strength. Secondly, it must have resilience or ability to absorb energy without permanent deformation. Thirdly, it must have good spring back characteristics after it has been pushed out of its shape so that it will spring back to its original shape without permanent deformation. Fourthly, it must have good vibration damping and have the requisite toughness as well as abrasion resistance. The above characteristics are best embodied in the TPU material which allows one to build the insert as a mechanical button comprising a molded piece of clear urethane. As the string moves forward it pushes the clear TPU forward to close a switch in the lighted nock assembly.
Note that there are a few alternate materials to TPU, but if so, they must be optically as clear as possible and must transmit a large portion of the light out the distal end of the nock. Other exemplary materials that could be used would be commonly referred to as thermoplastic elastomers (TPEs) or simply rubber materials. While rubber could not be used in a lighted nock, it would be sufficient in an unlighted application.
The TPU insert in the distal end of the nock may either have a notch or half-moon configuration to control the string motion appropriately to keep it from slipping off the back of the projectile. In another embodiment the TPU insert may be a flat disk button which is contacted by the bow string.
In summary, a shock absorbing insert is placed at the distal end of a nock, lighted or not, in which the insert serves as a shock absorber to prevent fracture or damage to the nock during crossbow firing, thus to eliminate safety problems associated with crossbow string slap. An additional benefit is the overall reduction in vibration throughout the crossbow and projectile system.
These and other features of the subject invention will be better understood in connection with the Detailed Description, in conjunction with the Drawings, of which:
Referring now to
The problem with such a nock construction is that the nock may fracture as illustrated at 30 with the slap of bow string 16 against the distal end of the nock 30. Not only does the fracturing of the nock 30 eliminate all loading on the bow string 16 as it is released which can cause fracture it also can cause the bolt shown at 20′ to move off axis as illustrated by arrow 32 which can impact hunters or other people nearby, a clear safety problem.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring now to
It has been found that injection molded TPU is not permanently deformable but rather has a memory such that after impact of the bow string it moves back to its original position, in one embodiment having actuated an internally carried light source. Further it is noted that support structure 40 which in one case is metal and preferably aluminum is inserted into a channel 54 in the distal end of a bolt here shown at 56 such that a unitary structure is provided with the metal support structure 40 being inserted into channel 54 and extending aft to receive the injection molded TPU shock absorbing insert 42.
Typically a crossbow 10 shown in
Referring now to
As illustrated in
As illustrated, the force imparted by the slap of the bow string is illustrated at 84 in terms of the arrows which impact first a transverse rib 86 which forms part of the shock absorber insert 70, with the force then tending towards the center of the insert 70 as illustrated by arrows 88.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
While the present invention has been described in connection with the preferred embodiments of the various figures, it is to be understood that other similar embodiments may be used or modifications or additions may be made to the described embodiment for performing the same function of the present invention without deviating therefrom. Therefore, the present invention should not be limited to any single embodiment, but rather construed in breadth and scope in accordance with the recitation of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/832,764 filed on Aug. 21, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/998,213, filed on Oct. 11, 2013, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2484589 | Richards | Oct 1949 | A |
2887319 | Lay | May 1959 | A |
4003576 | Carella | Jan 1977 | A |
4065018 | Megowen | Dec 1977 | A |
4293078 | Percarpio | Oct 1981 | A |
4305588 | Dodge | Dec 1981 | A |
4340930 | Carissimi | Jul 1982 | A |
4547837 | Bennett | Oct 1985 | A |
4645211 | Beiter | Feb 1987 | A |
D301272 | Barrow et al. | May 1989 | S |
4856792 | Hardison | Aug 1989 | A |
4900037 | Miller | Feb 1990 | A |
5134552 | Call et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5154432 | Saunders | Oct 1992 | A |
5306020 | Bolf | Apr 1994 | A |
5516857 | Mann | May 1996 | A |
5688890 | Ishiguro et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5959059 | Vedula et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6123631 | Ginder | Sep 2000 | A |
6364499 | Jones | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6390642 | Simonton | May 2002 | B1 |
6695727 | Kuhn | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6736742 | Price et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
7021784 | DiCarlo | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7189170 | Korsa et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7211011 | Sutherland | May 2007 | B1 |
7374504 | Palomaki et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7726498 | Anraku | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7837580 | Huang et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7862457 | Urcheck | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7922609 | Hajari | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7927240 | Lynch | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7931550 | Lynch | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7993224 | Brywig | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8123636 | Temprine | Feb 2012 | B1 |
D664625 | Minica | Jul 2012 | S |
8257208 | Harding | Sep 2012 | B2 |
D669955 | Minica | Oct 2012 | S |
D669956 | Minica | Oct 2012 | S |
8342990 | Price | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8540594 | Chu | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8622855 | Bednar et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8758177 | Minica | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8795109 | Roman | Aug 2014 | B2 |
9140527 | Pedersen et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
20020039939 | Hartman | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20030166425 | Sutherland et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20090097239 | Lynch | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20120100942 | Minica | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20130267359 | Pedersen | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140187362 | Pedersen et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2777647 | Oct 1999 | FR |
2320207 | Jun 1998 | GB |
Entry |
---|
Archery Talk—Archers Helping Archers Forum: “Homemade Stuff?”, http://www.archerytalk.com/vb/showthread.php?t=201870&page=48&p=5786267 (2007). |
Archery Talk—Archers Helping Archers Forum: “Homemade Stuff?”, http://www.archerytalk.com/vb/showthread.php?t=201870&page=48&p=5791405 (2007). |
Archery Talk—Archers Helping Archers Forum: “Homemade Stuff?”, http://www.archerytalk.com/vb/showthread.php?t=201870&page=62&p=1056170361 (2009). |
PCT International Search Report (PCT Article 18 and Rules 43 and 44) for PCT/US2013/076108, Mar. 13, 2014. |
PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority (PCT Rule 43bis.1) for PCT/US2013/076108, Mar. 13, 2014. |
International Search Report from PCT/US2014/059742, Dec. 22, 2014. |
Written Opinion of the International Search Authority from PCT/US2014/059742, Dec. 22, 2014. |
International Search Report from PCT/US2014/059723, Dec. 22, 2014. |
Written Opinion of the International Search Authority from PCT/US2014/059723, Dec. 22, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160202029 A1 | Jul 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14832764 | Aug 2015 | US |
Child | 15077471 | US | |
Parent | 13998213 | Oct 2013 | US |
Child | 14832764 | US |