The invention relates generally to vibration damping and, more particularly, to vibration damping of static engine parts using a retaining ring.
Mechanical frictional damping is often used to dissipate vibrations in machines with rotating parts. The type of friction damper to be used is a function of the type of motion (mode shapes and frequencies) to be damped. Not all friction dampers can be fitted mechanically nor may perform as well in all applications. The mounting and localisation of the damper on the part also affect the amount of damping obtained. The surrounding environment in which the damper is to be used must also be taken into account. Accordingly, several damping schemes typically may have to be tested in order to determine the amount of damping that can be obtained for each particular application. In addition to being efficient, the solution must be inexpensive, easy to assemble while still being reliable.
There is thus an ongoing need to provide new vibration damping schemes for different parts to be damped.
In one aspect, there is provided a gas turbine engine compressor comprising a rotor mounted for rotation about a central axis of the engine, the rotor having a series of circumferentially distributed blades, each of said blades having a tip, a shroud surrounding said rotor and having a radially inwardly facing surface defining a flowpath and with the tip of said blades a tip clearance, and a retaining ring mounted to a radially outwardly facing surface of the shroud, said retaining ring being in frictional engagement with said radially outwardly facing surface of said shroud, the friction and relative motion between the retaining ring and the shroud provides damping of the vibration deflection induced in the shroud.
In a second aspect, there is provided a vibration damping arrangement comprising a static gas turbine engine part subject to vibrations, a multi-turn retaining ring mounted in frictional engagement with the static gas turbine engine part, each turn of the multi-turn retaining ring being in frictional contact with an adjacent turn, the multi-turn retaining ring having a radial stiffness sufficient to cause the retaining ring to slip on the static gas turbine engine part in response to vibratory motion of the static engine part, the slip between the adjacent turns of the retaining ring as well as between the retaining ring and the static gas turbine engine part both causing frictional damping of the vibration induced in the static gas turbine engine part.
In a third aspect, there is provided a method of damping vibration induced in a static annular shroud, wherein the annular shroud is subject to deflections induced by vibration, the method comprising: opposing the deflections by externally mounting a retaining ring in frictional engagement with an outer surface of the annular shroud, the retaining ring having a radial stiffness sufficient to substantially not conform to the shroud deflections, thereby resulting in relative sliding motion between the shroud and the retaining ring, the relative sliding motion providing frictional damping of the vibration.
In a fourth aspect, there is provided a method of damping vibration induced in a static gas turbine engine part, comprising: providing a multi-turn retaining ring of the type used to fasten a first part to a second part, the multi-turn retaining ring having at least two turns; and causing said retaining ring to slip on an external surface of the static shroud and said at least two turns to slip relative to each other as a reaction to vibration induced in the static gas turbine engine part, the friction between the multi-turn retaining ring and the static gas turbine engine part as well as the friction between the at least two turns of the multi-turn retaining ring providing vibration damping.
The term “retaining ring” is herein intended to refer to rings usually used as fasteners to retain a component in a shaft or a bore. The ring may for instance be provided in the form of a single turn ring or a multi-turn spiral wound ring with wavy, bowed and/or dished shapes. Several single turn rings can be mounted side by side on the part to be dampened in order to provide the additional frictional benefit offered by multi-turn rings. The term “multi-turn ring” is, thus, herein intended to refer to rings having multiple spiral coils as well as to arrangements of multiple adjacent single-turn rings.
Further details of these and other aspects of the present invention will be apparent from the detailed description and figures included below.
Reference is now made to the accompanying figures depicting aspects of the present invention, in which:
As shown in
The compressor shroud 30 has a radially inner surface 44 defining an outer flow path boundary for the air flowing across the impeller 20. The radially inner surface 44 of the shroud 30 is disposed in close proximity to the tip ends 28 of the blades 26 and defines therewith a tip clearance. In use, the rotation of the compressor rotor 20, the pressure variation in the air flowing across the compressor 14 and mechanical sources can induce vibrations in the compressor shroud 30. Excessive vibration can cause fatigue or cracking of the structural member thereby adversely affecting the overall efficiency of the engine and its durability.
It is herein proposed to provide a mechanical damper at the forward end portion 32 of the shroud 30 in order to minimize the effect of vibratory stress and improve durability. As shown in
As shown in
It is understood that multiple adjacent single-turn rings could be used as an equivalent to the illustrated multi-turn ring.
The WS, WSM, DNS, ES, WST and WSW retaining ring series manufactured by Smalley Steel Ring Company could for instance be used as damping rings. Other suitable retaining ring could be used as well.
Retaining rings having relatively high stiffness in the radial direction due to their narrow and tall cross-section (see
The slip may be both radial and tangential at the inside diameter and adjacent axial faces of the channel 47 with any displacement causing slip between the ring 46 and shroud 30 as well as each of the coils of the retaining ring 46 due to its multi-turn design. It has been demonstrated that more turns of the ring significantly increases the damping by providing additional frictional surfaces as each coil slips relative to each other in addition to the slip occurring on the shroud contacting surfaces.
In view of the foregoing, it is apparent that the mechanical damper contributes to improve the durability of the shroud 30 with minimum effect on the engine configuration. Furthermore, the use of a retaining ring as a mechanical damper provides a simple, reliable and relatively inexpensive way of damping the vibration induced in the shroud 30. It is also easy to implement, maintain and manufacture.
The above description is meant to be exemplary only, and one skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made to the embodiments described without departing from the scope of the invention disclosed. For example, while the present invention has been described in the context of an impeller shroud, it is understood that a similar concept could be used on other engine static parts prone to vibrations, such as rotor shrouds in general, stators and baffles. The damping ring in some instances could also be mounted to an internal surface of the part to be dampened as opposed to the illustrated external mounting. Still other modifications which fall within the scope of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art, in light of a review of this disclosure, and such modifications are intended to fall within the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2945290 | Walsh | Jul 1960 | A |
3326523 | Bob | Jun 1967 | A |
4113052 | McElroy, Jr. | Sep 1978 | A |
4116171 | Schulmeister et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4325650 | Masai | Apr 1982 | A |
4361213 | Landis, Jr. et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4411592 | Traver et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4491184 | Kawaharazuka | Jan 1985 | A |
4621976 | Marshall et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
5346362 | Bonner et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5432307 | Maurer | Jul 1995 | A |
5681142 | Lewis | Oct 1997 | A |
5733103 | Wallace et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
6149382 | Englander et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6485241 | Oxford | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6494679 | Gadre et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
7223020 | Bauer et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7997857 | Battig et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090136348 A1 | May 2009 | US |