The invention relates generally to support brackets for supporting roller blinds.
Roller blinds generally include an elongated roller tube upon which a section of fabric blind (or shade) is wound. The fabric blind is raised or lowered by rotating the roller tube about its axis, thereby unwinding or rewinding the fabric blind. A control mechanism (or clutch mechanism) is used to control the rotation of the roller tube. The control mechanism may consist of a hand operated pull chain, but increasingly, motorized control mechanisms are used to drive the control mechanism. The entire apparatus, roller tube, control mechanism, electric motor and fabric blind is mounted adjacent the top of a window by means of two or more support brackets. These support brackets generally consist of a stamped steel bracket which has a plurality of apertures and other structures for mounting the brackets to the window frame (or wall as the case may be). Generally, there will be two support brackets for each roller blind, with one support bracket supporting the end of the blind having the control mechanism and a second bracket supporting the opposite end of the blind (usually referred to as the idle end of the blind). The idle end generally consists of a plug like member which supports the roller tube end opposite the control mechanism. The idle end may be configured such that it rotates as the roller tube rotates. Generally, these support brackets must be mounted directly to the control mechanism and the idle end to ensure proper operation of the blind.
While this combination of support brackets, control mechanisms and idle ends have been used quite successfully for several decades, there is one problem generally associated with this combination. Vibration created in the blind, by either the control mechanism or the idle end, will be transmitted through the support brackets and to the wall, ceiling or window frame mounted to the support brackets. While this is often of little concern in hand operated roller blinds, electric powered roller blinds can generate annoying vibrations which translate into unpleasant noise when the blind is operated. In order to minimize the problem, the electric motors and control mechanisms used should be of high quality and precision manufacture in order to reduce vibration. An improved arrangement which overcomes the problems associated with vibration created by electric blind motors is therefore desirable.
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a support for mounting an end of a roller blind to a structure such as a wall, ceiling and window frame. The support includes a first plate for mounting to the end of the roller blind and a second plate adjacent the first plate. The second plate has a central aperture dimensioned to receive the end of the roller blind. The support further includes a bracket for mounting the second plate to the structure. A plurality of vibration absorbing fasteners are provided for mounting the first plate to the second plate and dampening vibrations travelling from the first plate to the second plate.
With the foregoing in view, and other advantages as will become apparent to those skilled in the art to which this invention relates as this specification proceeds, the invention is herein described by reference to the accompanying drawings forming a part hereof, which includes a description of the preferred typical embodiment of the principles of the present invention.
In the drawings like characters of reference indicate corresponding parts in the different figures.
Referring to
Referring now to
Plate 16 is provided with a plurality of mounting elements 48 for mounting the plate to the control mechanism 14 (see
Referring back to
Referring back to
Referring to
A specific embodiment of the present invention has been disclosed; however, several variations of the disclosed embodiment could be envisioned as within the scope of this invention. It is to be understood that the present invention is not limited to the embodiments described above, but encompasses any and all embodiments within the scope of the following claims
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1476160 | Kirsch | Dec 1923 | A |
| 4323105 | Berman et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
| 5137073 | Huang | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5586631 | Benthin | Dec 1996 | A |
| 6497627 | Collins | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6527037 | Daus et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6729373 | Yukawa et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6817402 | Fraczek et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6896027 | Crouch | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6935401 | Fraczek et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 7128126 | Smith et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7380582 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
| 7740047 | Koop et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 8136569 | Bohlen et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8281845 | Seidel | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8382050 | Koop | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 20070158037 | Bohlen | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20080121353 | Detmer et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080202709 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20090152422 | Ng et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20100219306 | Detmer et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20110139381 | Daniels | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110265958 | Skinner et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20120228464 A1 | Sep 2012 | US |