This disclosure generally relates to structures for passively radiating sound waves, typically sound wave for reproducing low frequency audio (or bass). For background, reference is made to the pending application Ser. No. 12/751,352 filed on Mar. 31, 2010, for MOVING MAGNET LEVERED LOUDSPEAKER, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
In one aspect, an audio system uses at least one lever arm assemblies to mass balance a passive radiator. Multiple lever arm assemblies may also be used to mass balance a passive radiator. In addition, multiple lever arm assemblies may be arranged around the passive radiator such that they also reduce rocking modes of the passive radiator, and may be configured to essentially torque balance the passive radiator. Each lever arm assembly includes a fulcrum fixed to a mechanical ground, a lever arm attached the passive radiator on one side of the fulcrum and a counterbalance mass attached on the other side of the fulcrum.
In another aspect, an audio system includes an enclosure enclosing a volume of air, a passive radiator mounted to the enclosure and in fluid communication with the volume of air, a fulcrum fixed to a mechanical ground, and a lever arm attached to the passive radiator on a first side of the fulcrum and a mass coupled to it on a second side of the fulcrum. With this arrangement, the lever arm and its mass move with the passive radiator such that it reduces a level of vibration transmitted to the mechanical ground caused by movement of the passive radiator, when compared with the level of vibration transmitted to the mechanical ground by movement of the passive radiator without the operation of the lever arm and its mass.
In some implementations, the mechanical ground may be the enclosure of the audio system. Also, multiple lever arms may be used to reduce the level of vibration transmitted to the mechanical ground by the passive radiator. In addition, multiple lever arms may be arranged to provide a greater resistance to rocking by the passive radiator when compared with the passive radiator without operation of the lever arms and their masses. The fulcrum of the lever arms may be attached to the same enclosure wall as the passive radiator, or a different call (such as wall adjacent to or opposite of the wall on which the passive radiator is mounted). The system may include one or more transducers that are in fluid communication with the volume of air, and, if two (or more) transducers are used, they may be mounted such that their acoustic energy adds while their mechanical vibrations into the enclosure subtract. The lever arm may be attached to the passive radiator with a coupling that allows for the simultaneous linear movement of the passive radiator and actuate movement of the passive radiator. This coupling may be a compliant coupling.
In another aspect, an audio system includes an enclosure enclosing a volume of air, a passive radiator, and a plurality of lever arms coupled to the passive radiator at a first end of each lever arm. Each lever arm is further pivotally attached to a fulcrum and each fulcrum is attached to a mechanical ground. Each lever arm also includes a mass on the side of the fulcrum opposed the side on which the lever arm is attached to the passive radiator such that the lever arms move the masses out of phase with movement of the passive radiator.
In some implementations, the plurality of lever arms may be arranged to torque balance the passive radiator. The plurality of lever arms may be attached symmetrically around a surface of the passive radiator. The plurality of lever arms may be arranged to provide a greater resistance to rocking by the passive radiator when compared with the passive radiator without operation of the lever arms and their masses. The fulcrum of the lever arms may be attached to the same enclosure wall as the passive radiator, or a different call (such as wall adjacent to or opposite of the wall on which the passive radiator is mounted). The enclosure of the audio system may be the mechanical ground of the lever arms.
In another aspect, a passive radiator assembly (suitable for mounting in an acoustic enclosure) includes a diaphragm, a flexible surround coupled to the diaphragm that permits movement of the diaphragm in response to pressure fluctuations in the enclosure, and a lever arm assembly. The lever arm assembly includes a fulcrum configured to be fixed to a mechanical ground, a lever arm attached to the diaphragm on a first side of the fulcrum and a mass coupled to the lever arm on the second side of the fulcrum.
In some implementations, the passive radiator assembly may include multiple lever arms, each have a fulcrum configured to attach to a mechanical ground on one side of the lever arm and a mass coupled to the opposite side of the lever arms. The multiple lever arms may be arranged to reduce rocking by the passive radiator (when compared with a passive radiator with no lever arms) and may be arranged to completely torque balance the passive radiator.
As shown in
Note that in this example, transducer 14a and transducer 14b receive the same signal. Thus, the two transducers will move symmetrically (as shown by arrows 16a, 16b). As the two transducers move together, their acoustic energy adds. However, since the transducers are mounted on opposite walls of the enclosure, their mechanical vibrations cancel—for example, as transducer 14a moves to the left as shown in
System 10 also includes a passive radiator 12 that is acoustically coupled with the transducers 14a, 14b through the sealed volume of air within the enclosure. The design of passive radiator based loudspeaker systems is known, and will not be described in detail here. In brief, the passive radiator in conjunction with the volume of air contained in enclosure 11 forms a resonant system. A loudspeaker designer will choose a tuning frequency for this resonant system according to a design goal for the loudspeaker system. Once the designer has chosen a desired tuning frequency (the details of determining such a tuning frequency are known and will not be described), the area of the passive radiator diaphragm, the moving mass of the diaphragm assembly, the volume of the enclosure, and the compliance of the passive radiator suspension are determined. The tuning frequency is determined by the moving mass of the diaphragm (comprising the diaphragm physical mass and any associated acoustic mass of the air load on the passive radiator diaphragm), the effective mechanical compliance of the air in enclosure 11 (determined by the volume of enclosure 11 and the passive radiator diaphragm area), and the passive radiator suspension compliance.
A lever arm 18 (shown in
One end of the lever arm 18 (i.e., the end near the tip 23 of the lever arm 18) is attached to the center of the inner surface of the passive radiator 12 with a coupling 21. At the opposite end of the lever arm a counter-balance mass 22 is mounted, which is selected such that it cancels the inertia of the moving passive radiator. Assuming the mass of the lever arm 18, coupling 21, and suspension element 13 are small in comparison to the mass of the passive radiator 12 and counter-balance mass 22, the total effective moving mass of the system MT (i.e., the passive radiator 12, lever arm 18, and counterbalance mass 22) of a single-lever system can be expressed as follows:
MT=Mradiator+(l2/l1)2*Mcounterbalance (equation 1)
The above analysis provides a useful simplification for understanding the behavior and relationships among system elements. If a designer wished to be more precise, the designer would also consider the effects of the lever arm masses, friction in the fulcrum pivot, stiffness of the coupling, stiffness of the lever arm, etc. in the system design. To consider these elements in the design, a finite element model of the complete mechanical system could be developed using commercially available software tools such as Abaqus Unified FEA, available from Dassault Systèmes of Vélizy-Villacoublay, France.
Additionally, one would also consider the fact that motion of the diaphragm is generally linear along a single axis, while motion of the compensating mass is arcuate. The component of the momentum of the compensating mass aligned with the axis of motion of the passive radiator diaphragm will be proportional to the cosine of the angle of displacement of its lever arm. For small angular displacements, the cosine is approximately equal to 1, and there is little error introduced by assuming the compensating mass moves linearly. As the angle of displacement of the lever arm increases, the cosine of the angle of decreases, the component of momentum of the compensating mass aligned with the axis of motion of the passive radiator diaphragm will decrease, and the relative momentums of the compensating mass and the moving mass of the passive radiator will no longer exactly offset each other. As such, it may be desirable for the system designer to choose compensating mass and lever arm segment lengths to obtain smaller angular displacements for a given passive radiator displacement. It may also be desirable, for system designs with larger angular displacement of the lever arms, for the compensating mass to be chosen such that it is slightly larger than ½ the desired tuning mass, and the moving mass of the passive radiator is chosen to be slightly less than ½ the tuning mass. This would sacrifice momentum cancellation for smaller angular displacements, but would improve it for larger angular displacements.
Using the above simplified equations, a system can be designed by first determining the total desired effective moving mass (MT) of the passive radiator assembly, as discussed previously. Once MT is determined, the mass of the passive radiator diaphragm can be set to be ½*MT (equation 2), and then the counter-balance mass and lever arm lengths l1 and l2 can be selected using equation 2. Note that the magnitude of the counter-balance mass is effected by selection of lever arm lengths. Choosing a high-value lever arm ratio (i.e., l2/l1) will require a smaller counter-balance mass, but the counter-balance mass will travel a greater distance to counter-act vibration of the passive radiator. Conversely, choosing a low lever arm ration will require a larger counter-balance mass, but the counter-balance mass will travel a smaller distance to counter-act vibration of the passive radiator. It should be noted that the counterbalance mass and lever arm ratio need not be selected to exactly counterbalance the mass of the passive radiator 12. For example, the product lever arm ratio and passive radiator mass (i.e., l1/l2* Mradiator,) may be selected to be slightly smaller (or even larger) than the mass of the passive radiator to cancel some (but not all) vibration produced by movement of the passive radiator 12.
Since the tip 23 of the lever arm 18 will move in an arc (illustrated by arrow 25 in
In operation, as the passive radiator moves in one direction (e.g., outward from the center of the enclosure as shown in
As shown in
Attached to each lever arm is identical compensating mass 22a, 22b. The mass elements 22a, 22b are selected to balance the mass of the passive radiator 12. Assuming the mass of the lever arms (18a, 18b), coupling (21a, 21b), and suspension element 13 are small in comparison to the mass of the passive radiator 12, the total effective moving mass of the system MT (i.e., the passive radiator 12, lever arms 18a and 18b, and counterbalance masses 22a and 22b) of a double-lever system can be expressed as follows:
MT=Mradiator+(l2/l1)2*Mcounterbalance
Where Mceff is the effective compensation mass of the lever arm assemblies 18a, 18b.
Substituting equation 5 into equation 4, the following result is obtained:
MT=Mradiator+Mradiator=2*Mradiator,or
Mradiator=½*MT (equation 7)
Note that equation 7 yields the same result as equation 3 in the single lever arm system. Thus, the moving mass of the passive radiator 12 can be set to ½ of the total effective moving mass (MT) of the passive radiator assembly.
In equation 6, the effective compensation mass (Mceff) of the lever arms 18a, 18b is introduced. Substituting this term into equation 5 yields:
Mradiator=Mceff+Mceff=2*Mceff (equation 8)
Substituting equations 6 and 8 into equation 4 yields the following:
MT=2*Mceff+Mceff+Mceff=4*Mceff,or (equation 9)
Mceff=¼*MT (equation 10)
To solve for the compensation masses 22a, 22b and lever arm ratios for the lever arms 18a, 18b, substitute equation 10 into equation 6, which yields:
¼*MT=(l2/l1)2*Mcounterbalance
Note that selection of the counterbalance masses 22a, 22b is not unique since their magnitude is effected by selection of the lever arm ratios. Note, also, that the counter-balance masses and lever arm ratios can be different for each lever arm assembly, even if their resulting products are the same, although use of different lever arm segment lengths will result in different angular displacements which can cause the component of momentum in the direction of motion of the passive radiator diaphragm of each counterbalance mass to vary with respect to each other as a function of angular displacement. Note also that while equations 4-11 are for a two lever-arm system, these equations are readily extendible to any multi-arm system by simply adding terms like (l2/l1)2*Mcounterbalance
Using the above equations, a multi-lever arm system can be designed by first determining the total desired effective moving mass (MT) of the passive radiator assembly, areas discussed previously. Once MT is determined, the mass of the passive radiator diaphragm can be set to be ½*MT (equation 7), and then the counter-balance masses 22a, 22b, etc. and lever arm lengths l1, l2, l3, l4, etc. can be selected using equations 5 and 6 or equation 11.
In operation, the masses 22a, 22b move in an opposite direction as the passive radiator diaphragm 12 and, since they are selected to balance the mass of the passive radiator, they cancel much of the mechanical vibration experienced by the system 10 caused by movement of the passive radiator 12. In addition, use of multiple lever arms arranged symmetrically along the rear surface of the passive radiator helps to keep the passive radiator torque balanced. In other words, the two lever arms shown in
In some implementations, three or more lever arms may be used to mass balance and/or torque balance the passive radiator. Additionally, the lever arms may be attached within the enclosure at various attachment points to accommodate different packaging arrangements. For example, as shown in
The lever arms may also be mounted such that they are mounted in-board of the perimeter of passive radiator. For example, as shown in
There has been described novel apparatus and techniques for reducing vibration of a driver enclosure through counteracting force and rocking of a passive radiator. It is evident that those skilled in the art may now make numerous uses and modifications of and departures these specific apparatus and techniques herein disclosed without departing from the inventive concepts. Consequently, the invention is to be construed as embracing each and every novel feature and each and every novel combination of features present at in or possessed by the apparatus and techniques herein disclosed and limited solely by the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1536116 | Martin | May 1925 | A |
1579864 | Hobart | Apr 1926 | A |
1583490 | Peterson | May 1926 | A |
1614327 | Thomas | Jan 1927 | A |
1633170 | Fischer | Jun 1927 | A |
1633366 | Fischer | Jun 1927 | A |
1683946 | Baldwin | Sep 1928 | A |
1690147 | Waddell | Nov 1928 | A |
1693223 | Danziger | Nov 1928 | A |
1713210 | Barton | May 1929 | A |
1718357 | Miller | Jun 1929 | A |
1726533 | Baldwin | Sep 1929 | A |
1732644 | Farrand | Oct 1929 | A |
1784517 | Farrand | Dec 1930 | A |
1823512 | Ringel | Sep 1931 | A |
1844605 | Seabert | Feb 1932 | A |
2078469 | Thomas | Apr 1937 | A |
3062926 | Ronci | Nov 1962 | A |
3454912 | Morrison | Jul 1969 | A |
3460080 | Carbonaro | Aug 1969 | A |
3701865 | Carlson et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3777078 | Boutros-Attia et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3836733 | Cragg | Sep 1974 | A |
3878725 | Gaertner | Apr 1975 | A |
3937904 | Parker | Feb 1976 | A |
4000381 | Plice et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4126769 | Broersma | Nov 1978 | A |
4379952 | Kaizer et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4387275 | Shimada et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4547631 | Nieuwendijk et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4564727 | Danley et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4825713 | Wilkey | May 1989 | A |
5216723 | Froeschle et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5588065 | Tanaka et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5664020 | Goldfarb et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5701359 | Guenther et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5802189 | Blodget | Sep 1998 | A |
5809157 | Grumazescu | Sep 1998 | A |
5859731 | Vezain et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5883339 | Greenberger | Mar 1999 | A |
6169811 | Croft, III | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6176345 | Perkins et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6396936 | Nevill | May 2002 | B1 |
6778677 | Coffin | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6851513 | Stead et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6889796 | Pocock et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7174990 | Stead et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7190803 | van Halteren | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7366317 | Miller et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7386137 | Combest | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7412763 | Jiles et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7480390 | Tabata et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7508953 | Hlibowicki | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7860264 | Jiles et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8085955 | Henry | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8139813 | Kobayashi et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8290198 | Ogasawara et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
20020146145 | James et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20050141744 | Hlibowicki | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050157900 | Litovsky et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050168111 | Bank et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20070081687 | Hayashi | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070092091 | Noro et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070201712 | Saiki | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070272475 | Stead et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070291965 | Noro et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080247595 | Henry | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090097667 | Botti et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090245561 | Litovsky et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20110069859 | Kobayashi et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110176703 | Horigome et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110243365 | Carlmark et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110243366 | Carlmark et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120106772 | Horigome et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20130322656 | Adams | Dec 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
345834 | Nov 1927 | BE |
646416 | Jun 1937 | DE |
0508570 | Oct 1992 | EP |
2146521 | Jan 2010 | EP |
572766 | Jun 1924 | FR |
212857 | Mar 1924 | GB |
220990 | Aug 1924 | GB |
0248176 | Mar 1926 | GB |
0310759 | Apr 1929 | GB |
0361464 | Nov 1931 | GB |
396990 | Aug 1933 | GB |
1294960 | Nov 1972 | GB |
1426391 | Feb 1976 | GB |
2071961 | Sep 1981 | GB |
58107799 | Jun 1983 | JP |
08079885 | Mar 1996 | JP |
0054550 | Sep 2000 | WO |
2010106690 | Sep 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
C-Flex The Bearing Solution Product Information; Frictionless, Low Hysteresis Bearing for Angular Applications; Bearing Co., Inc. |
C-Flex The Bearing Solution Technical Data; Frictionless, Low Hysteresis Bearing for Angular Applications; Bearing Co., Inc. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion Dated Jun. 15, 2011 PCT/US2011/028965. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion Dated Jun. 15, 2011for PCT/US2011/028960. |
McLachlan, N. W.; Loud Speakers, Theory Performance, Testing and Design, Dover Publications, Inc., NY, NY 1960 pp. 225-226. |
Olsen, Harry F.; Microphones, Acoustical Engineering, Professional Audio Journals, Inc., Philadelphia, PA 1991 pp. 270-271. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140064539 A1 | Mar 2014 | US |