The present invention is relates to a vibration stop device necessary for stopping vibration of a work in a process stage.
Accurate processing on a work in a process stage requires the work to be prevented from vibrating.
The work is divided into a processing region and a non-processing region along a circumferential direction, and in many cases, moves together with a main shaft in a state where a holding part for vibration stop is in pressure contact with an already processed region of the work.
As shown in
On the other hands, the pressure contact state causes a problem that the pressure contact region of the holding part intrudes into a region recessed by the processing, in the other words, in a recess, and even if the work is to be rotated along a columnar center axis for the next processing, such rotation is hindered due to the intrusion.
However, in the prior art, no particular countermeasure has been taken for the problem caused by the pressure contact region of the holding part intruding into the recesses that has been formed by the processing.
For reference, Patent Document 1 describes, regarding a camshaft work to be ground, a processing region and vibration stop for the work, nevertheless has no particular description on the relationship between the processing region and the vibration stop.
Patent Document 2 describes both processing on a work and a vibration stop device, but does not describe the problem arising when the pressure contact region comes into contact with the region that has already been processed.
An object of the present invention is to provide a configuration of a vibration stop device that can prevent a problem caused by a pressure contact region of a holding part of the vibration stop device intruding into a recess of a region that has been processed.
To achieve the object, the present invention has the following method:
(1) A method of stopping vibration of a columnar work during processing of the columnar work, the method comprising the steps of:
(2) A method according to structure (1), wherein the processing processed region extends for an angular range of the columnar work, and the step of holding includes the step of holding the outer circumferential surface of the columnar work with the holding parts in such a manner that the holding parts hold the columnar work in the non-processed region along an angular range around the columnar work which is larger than an angular range of the processed region which is formed in the recess of the columnar work.
In the present invention using the method of (1), (2), (3), (4) and (5), the pressure contact region of the holding part of the vibration stop device never introduces into the recess in the processing region, and so, the problem in the rotation of the work due to the intrusion can be prevented.
Moreover, in the examples described later, the position of the holding parts can be independently adjusted, whereby the precision error of the work can be easily corrected.
As described in the basic structure, the present invention has a feature that, regarding the angular range based on a position of an axis of rotation of a columnar work 2, an angular range formed by both ends of each of a holding part for vibration stop 11 is larger than an angular range of a processing region 21.
The basic structure can be embodied in a number of ways.
In the first embodiment, pressure contact can be done mainly at a non-processing region 22.
Of course a holding part for vibration stop 11 never intrudes into a recess of the processing region 21 that has already been processed.
In the second and third embodiments, the surface of the holding part for vibration stop 11 on the pressure contact side might come into contact with or come close to a surface of the processing region 21, as shown in
As shown in
In the first embodiment, even when the entire processing region 21 is formed into the recess as shown in
However, in the second and third embodiments, as shown in
The first embodiment does not require the third holding part for vibration stop 11, and thus can achieve a simpler design and lower cost compared with the second and third embodiment.
However, the first embodiment requires the holding parts for vibration stop 11 having radii of curvature respectively corresponding to the various radii of the works 2, and thus is more cumbersome than the second and third embodiment in this point.
Examples are described as follows:
As shown in
When a precision error occurs in the work 2, the pressure contact state created by a vibration stop device needs to be immediately released, and the processing region 21 where the precision error has occurred needs to be rotated to an operation position on a main shaft side.
In such a case, the conventional technique shown in
In the example 1, the rotation state can be achieved by immediately releasing, from each of the holding parts for vibration stop 11, pressure supplied from the hydraulic cylinder 31, and the precision error can be quickly corrected.
In many cases, a number of the holding parts for vibration stop 11 and a number of the hydraulic cylinders 31 shown in the example 1 are each three.
As shown in
Specifically, a hydraulic cylinder 31, a pressure reducing valve 32 for adjusting the pressure, and the solenoid valve 33 for turning ON and OFF transmission of reduced pressure are used as in the conventional technique, and the relief valve 34 in parallel with an oil pressure circuit is further provided.
In the example 2 described above, even if the vibrating state of the work 2 is changed and consequently the amount of pressure required for the pressure contact of the holding part for vibration stop 11 changes by turning ON the relief valve 34, the change in the pressure can be compensated by the relief valve turning on, so that the pressure transmitted to the hydraulic cylinder 31 can be reduced as much as possible.
Thus, the present invention can achieve the vibration stop without the problem of intrusion into the recess of the processing region, and can quickly correct the precision error, and thus is extremely useful.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2014-103625 | May 2014 | JP | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2104117 | Findlater | Jan 1938 | A |
2426498 | Franklin | Aug 1947 | A |
2547529 | Lichtenberg | Apr 1951 | A |
2558252 | Ifanger | Jun 1951 | A |
2593706 | Von Zelewsky | Apr 1952 | A |
2612809 | Shager | Oct 1952 | A |
2686444 | Reichl | Aug 1954 | A |
2693365 | Von Zelewsky | Nov 1954 | A |
2784977 | Dinsmore | Mar 1957 | A |
3101015 | Schuetz | Aug 1963 | A |
3232601 | Long | Feb 1966 | A |
3315595 | Moehlenpah | Apr 1967 | A |
3727772 | Pauls | Apr 1973 | A |
4403663 | Janssen | Sep 1983 | A |
4470285 | Cattaneo | Sep 1984 | A |
4519279 | Ruggeri | May 1985 | A |
4628779 | Louis | Dec 1986 | A |
4967579 | Haydo | Nov 1990 | A |
5282403 | Rouleau | Feb 1994 | A |
5347897 | Rouleau | Sep 1994 | A |
5668328 | Steber | Sep 1997 | A |
5740702 | Smith | Apr 1998 | A |
6062933 | Kasukawa | May 2000 | A |
6237445 | Wesch, Jr. | May 2001 | B1 |
6439087 | Haas | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6568096 | Svitkin | May 2003 | B1 |
6672185 | Behnke | Jan 2004 | B1 |
20070214921 | Fechter | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20100096793 | Falk | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100327507 | Clark | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20150328748 | Amaya | Nov 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3717091 | Aug 1988 | DE |
4125003 | Jan 1993 | DE |
102012217001 | Mar 2014 | DE |
10-175035 | Jun 1998 | JP |
2003-275903 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2005-169530 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2010-99746 | May 2010 | JP |
2010099746 | May 2010 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160214221 A1 | Jul 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14616236 | Feb 2015 | US |
Child | 15088907 | US |