This invention relates to vibrator motors, and more particularly to vibrator motors for hair clippers and the like that have fewer parts than conventional vibrator motors, and can be installed in a case after the motor is assembled.
Vibrator motors are available in a variety of configurations. Typically, the motor includes a stack of stationary laminations secured inside a case for a hair clipper or other device. A coil wrapped around the stationary laminations produces varying electromagnetic fields that drive a complimentary set of moving laminations.
The moving laminations are typically secured in an appropriate location with respect to the stationary laminations using a spring-like tail bracket. At least one, and usually two or three, pole faces are formed where the stationary and moving laminations are close to each other. One end of the tail bracket is secured to an end of the moving laminations, and the other end of the tail bracket is secured to the housing or the stationary laminations. The tail bracket/moving laminations assembly forms an arm of sorts that is attached at one end and open at the other. The open end of the moving laminations reciprocates to drive a clipper blade or some other device.
In addition to the tail bracket, conventional vibrator motors also have a mechanical spring system that allows the motor to be tuned to a proper resonant frequency so that it operates properly. The spring system also determines the position of the moving laminations and clipper blades when the coil is not energized. A typical spring system has two coil springs. When the coil is energized by alternating current, the tail bracket, the spring system and the electromagnetic fields generated by the coil make the clipper blade or other device reciprocate. Motor tuning is accomplished by adjusting the stiffness of the springs in the spring system to obtain good performance, usually by turning an appropriate screw which adjusts the tension in the springs. If not properly tuned the motor will not have sufficient power, or it will flutter or clatter and essentially operate in an uncontrolled manner or not operate at all.
Many things affect tuning, including the weight of the moving parts, the weight of the stationary parts, the length of the moving part of the arm, the energy release rate of the tuning springs, the alignment of the pole faces, the stiffness of the tail bracket, and other factors. Variations in any of these aspects of the device can cause problems in operation, and problems in manufacturing and assembly.
Variations in the tail bracket present particularly difficult manufacturing challenges. If the tail bracket material thickness or hardness varies even slightly, the resonant frequency (the speed at which the arm vibrates naturally) is affected, since the force required to move the arm is related to the stiffness of the tail bracket. Even variations in bends in the tail bracket can cause assembly problems, because they can make the motor untunable.
The tail bracket acts as a secondary tuning spring in addition to the two coil type tuning springs. If the neutral unsprung position of the tail bracket in the assembly is not the same as the neutral position of the arm when the clipper has been tuned, the tail bracket works against one of the tuning springs, applying a heavier load to one of the tuning springs than to the other. This causes the resonant frequency to change, since the spring load changes in order to compensate for the bias load applied by the tail bracket. Moreover, the force required to move the arm also varies under these conditions. Variations in tail bracket bends also affect the orientation of the blades, and in some cases make it difficult to properly align the blades of hair clippers.
Another problem with known vibrator motors is that they require several pieces that must be assembled together in the case. The case is usually molded from plastic, which can have substantial dimensional variation due to warping and dimensional variation inherent in the molding process. These variations can create manufacturing and assembly problems.
Dimensional variations of the pieces assembled in the case can create additional manufacturing and assembly problems. For example, if the drive finger is the wrong length, it can cause tuning problems due to the change in resonant frequency caused by a change in the length of the arm. In hair clippers, a drive finger that is too long can make it impossible to align the tips of the bottom blade teeth with the tips of the top blade teeth so that they have the correct overlap distance. If the drive finger is crooked, it can cause a crooked appearance of the top blade. If the drive finger is too far to the right or left, the teeth of the bottom blade might not be able to be adjusted to line up with the top blade teeth, causing a loss of cutting performance.
Dimensional variations can also cause misalignment of the pole faces of the stationary and moving laminations. If there is excessive variation in the case, and/or in the arm assembly, the pole faces of the arm laminations will not be aligned with the pole faces of the coil laminations. There can be a vertical misalignment or the laminations can be twisted such that there may be a larger gap between poles near the top than at the bottom, or vice versa. Also, one of the poles may be closer together than the other poles. In any of these cases, the motor will not operate as efficiently as if the poles were well aligned, because the magnetic gap will be larger than it should be at some place, resulting in loss of power and/or efficiency or higher than normal power consumption.
These problems can occur when one part, such as the case, is out of tolerance, or when the parts are individually within acceptable tolerances, but the cumulative variations from desired specifications is unacceptably high. Tolerance accumulation problems are often difficult to identify and resolve, particularly where the number of parts is high.
In some conventional motors, the tuning springs are located at the rear or bottom of the motor, away from the drive end of the arm. This can also cause tuning problems, because the springs have poor leverage.
In all, conventional motors have a relatively high number of parts which make them expensive and difficult to manufacture and assemble. Automation is also difficult because the designs are fairly complicated. Accordingly, there is a need for vibrator motors that are easier to manufacture and assemble, and are more adaptable to automated manufacture and assembly.
Accordingly, one object of this invention is to provide new and improved vibrator motors.
Another object is to provide new and improved vibrator motors for hair clippers and the like.
Another object is to provide new and improved vibrator motors that are less expensive and easier to manufacture and assemble than conventional motors.
Yet another object is to provide new and improved vibrator motors that do not have a tail bracket or the problems associated with tail brackets just discussed. A still further object is to provide new and improved vibrator motors that are less susceptible to parts tolerance build-up.
Still another object is to provide new and improved vibrator motors having fewer parts than conventional motors.
Still another object is to provide new and improved vibrator motors that can be pre-assembled and installed in a case after assembly.
In keeping with one aspect of this invention, a vibrator motor has a stationary piece and a moving piece. One end of the moving piece is hinged to an end of the stationary piece. The pieces are open at the other end, where complementary pole faces on the stationary and moving pieces are separated from each other by at least one predetermined variable gap. Another gap is typically provided near the hinge, and other gaps may be provided, if desired.
A coil is wound around a bobbin on the stationary piece. When the coil is energized with alternating current, it generates magnetic flux that flows through the stationary piece and the moving piece. The flux crosses the gap just above the hinge, as well as the gap at the other end of the motor pieces.
A bias spring system plays the primary role in establishing the size of the gap between the stationary and moving pieces, and the resonant frequency of the motor during operation. The bias on the spring system can be adjusted to obtain an acceptable gap and resonant frequency. An extension on the bobbin and a drive member on the moving piece provide support for the spring system.
The open vibrating end of the moving piece has sufficient power to drive a device such as the moving blade of a hair clipper or the like. The entire motor can be assembled and installed in a case as a single unit. In fact, the motor can even be tested and tuned outside of the case, before installation, if desired.
The moving piece is hinged directly to the stationary piece without a tail bracket, and the moving piece does not generate substantial internal spring forces under the influence of the magnetic field. The tail bracket and other parts of conventional motors are eliminated entirely, and the motor is less expensive to manufacture. It is also easier to manufacture and assemble because it has fewer parts, less cumulative tolerance among parts, and a simpler system for establishing the resonant frequency. In addition, the motor can be assembled and tuned before installation, which increases the ability to automate assembly.
The above mentioned and other features of this invention and the manner of obtaining them will become more apparent, and the invention itself will be best understood by reference to the following description of an embodiment of the invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
As seen in
The stationary piece 12 and the moving piece 14 form a hinge 16 at one end. Hinging can be accomplished in many ways. In
The hinge 16 may be lined with plastic 19 (
When assembled, the motor 10 has two gaps 21, 22 (
The motor 10 also includes a coil bobbin 23 (
The bobbin 23 also has an arm 27 used to support a movement control device such as a spring system 28 (
The spring system 28 (
The end of the stationary piece 12 at the open end 31 has an opening 43 that aligns with the opening 29 in the bobbin 23 for installation purposes. The end of the moving piece 14 at the open end 31 is configured to accept and secure a drive member 44 (
The screw 34 (
The moving piece 14 can be secured with respect to the stationary piece 12 at the hinge 16 in any suitable way, such as a screw and a washer, or a screw and a holder 60, shown in
The device 60 also includes a second surface 72 on another spring finger 73 that places lateral or radial pressure on the moving piece 14, to stabilize the moving piece 14 during operation by eliminating excessive chatter in the hinge. The surface 72 preferably presses against the moving piece 14, as shown.
The motor 10 is shown installed in a hair clipper 80 in
The case 82 (
The motor 10 can be easily pre-assembled and installed in the case 82 as a single unit by placing the assembled motor in the case such that the drive member 44 is operatively connected to the moving blade 86, and securing the motor with screws 89, 91. The screws 89, 91 are secured in threaded openings in the case 82. While the motor 10 may be tuned before installation in the case 82, if desired, it can also be tuned after installation.
The hair clipper 80 can be easily manufactured by securing the stationery blade 84 to the case, usually by screws, and placing the moving blade 86 adjacent the blade 84, usually using a spring that allows the blade 86 to reciprocate to cut hair. The motor 10 is then installed in the case 80 using screws 89, 91, with the drive member 44 engaging the moving blade 86. A cover is then placed over the case 80 and secured.
While the motor of this invention has been described with respect to a hair clipper, many other applications are contemplated, such as shavers, engravers, electric scissors, air pumps, sprayers, massagers and any other device that can operate with a vibrator motor. In products such as massagers, the moving piece can vibrate openly, without a driver.
While the principles of the invention have been described above in connection with specific apparatus and applications, it is to be understood that this description is made only by way of example and not as a limitation on the scope of the invention.
This is a divisional of application Ser. No. 09/855,989, filed May 15, 2001.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1547193 | Anderson | Jul 1925 | A |
1833191 | Van Osdel | Nov 1931 | A |
1891486 | Wahl | Dec 1932 | A |
2249057 | Stahl | Jul 1941 | A |
2283551 | Hanley | May 1942 | A |
2521653 | Ruud | Sep 1950 | A |
2699509 | Lee et al. | Jan 1955 | A |
2877364 | Wahl et al. | Mar 1959 | A |
2967253 | Wahl | Jan 1961 | A |
2986662 | Wahl | May 1961 | A |
3010036 | Wahl | Nov 1961 | A |
3354417 | Davis | Nov 1967 | A |
3357101 | Davis | Dec 1967 | A |
3405379 | Wilson | Oct 1968 | A |
3436574 | Larsson | Apr 1969 | A |
3493793 | Niemela | Feb 1970 | A |
3570122 | Williams | Mar 1971 | A |
3643117 | Alger et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3735297 | Pfenning | May 1973 | A |
3749951 | Artin et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
3800172 | Artin et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
3812389 | Bowerman | May 1974 | A |
3840760 | de Boer | Oct 1974 | A |
3846603 | Houser | Nov 1974 | A |
3906263 | Chen | Sep 1975 | A |
3931554 | Spentzas | Jan 1976 | A |
3946486 | Locke et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
3962783 | Rentema | Jun 1976 | A |
3970978 | Langree | Jul 1976 | A |
4157519 | Foster | Jun 1979 | A |
4160177 | Ascoli | Jul 1979 | A |
4221049 | Hamashima | Sep 1980 | A |
4392092 | Gassner | Jul 1983 | A |
4414963 | Kunz | Nov 1983 | A |
4617543 | Akachi et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
5565833 | Leet et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5771538 | Huppert, Sr. | Jun 1998 | A |
5787587 | Wahl et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5922379 | Wang | Jul 1999 | A |
6121697 | Soultanian | Sep 2000 | A |
6163092 | Soultanian | Dec 2000 | A |
6314648 | Hillebrandt | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6421922 | Beutel et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6493905 | Stettler | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6559563 | Shimizu et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6590990 | Abe et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6596215 | Mayumi et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6598824 | Schmidt | Jul 2003 | B2 |
20030094861 | Shimizu et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
28 26 419 | Dec 1979 | DE |
198 50 966 | Jul 2000 | DE |
116 869 | Aug 1984 | EP |
0 802 614 | Oct 1997 | EP |
802 614 | Oct 1997 | EP |
1496637 | Oct 1966 | FR |
501957 | Mar 1939 | GB |
594770 | Nov 1947 | GB |
724978 | Feb 1955 | GB |
868934 | Jul 1957 | GB |
797649 | Jul 1958 | GB |
62-16502 | Jan 1987 | JP |
2000-124028 | Apr 2000 | JP |
8801697 | Feb 1990 | NL |
0027599 | May 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030192186 A1 | Oct 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09855989 | May 2001 | US |
Child | 10434308 | US |