The field of the present invention pertains to digital electronic computer systems. More particularly, the present invention relates to a system for efficiently handling video information on a computer system.
The display of images and full-motion video is an area of the electronics industry improving with great progress in recent years. The display and rendering of high-quality video, particularly high-definition digital video, is a primary goal of modern video technology applications and devices. Video technology is used in a wide variety of products ranging from cellular phones, personal video recorders, digital video projectors, high-definition televisions, and the like. The emergence and growing deployment of devices capable of high-definition video generation and display is an area of the electronics industry experiencing a large degree of innovation and advancement.
The video technology deployed in many consumer electronics-type and professional level devices relies upon one or more video processors to format and/or enhance video signals for display. This is especially true for digital video applications. For example, one or more video processors are incorporated into a typical set top box and are used to convert HDTV broadcast signals into video signals usable by the display. Such conversion involves, for example, scaling, where the video signal is converted from a non-16×9 video image for proper display on a true 16×9 (e.g., widescreen) display. One or more video processors can be used to perform scan conversion, where a video signal is converted from an interlaced format, in which the odd and even scan lines are displayed separately, into a progressive format, where an entire frame is drawn in a single sweep.
Additional examples of video processor applications include, for example, signal decompression, where video signals are received in a compressed format (e.g., MPEG-2) and are decompressed and formatted for a display. Another example is re-interlacing scan conversion, which involves converting an incoming digital video signal from a DVI (Digital Visual Interface) format to a composite video format compatible with the vast number of older television displays installed in the market.
More sophisticated users require more sophisticated video processor functions, such as, for example, In-Loop/Out-of-loop deblocking filters, advanced motion adaptive de-interlacing, input noise filtering for encoding operations, polyphase scaling/re-sampling, sub-picture compositing, and processor-amplifier operations such as, color space conversion, adjustments, pixel point operations (e.g., sharpening, histogram adjustment etc.) and various video surface format conversion support operations.
The problem with providing such sophisticated video processor functionality is the fact that a video processor having a sufficiently powerful architecture to implement such functions can be excessively expensive to incorporate into many types of devices. The more sophisticated the video processing functions, the more expensive, in terms of silicon die area, transistor count, memory speed requirements, etc., the integrated circuit device required to implement such functions will be.
Accordingly, prior art system designers were forced to make trade-offs with respect to video processor performance and cost. Prior art video processors that are widely considered as having an acceptable cost/performance ratio have often been barely sufficient in terms of latency constraints (e.g., to avoid stuttering the video or otherwise stalling video processing applications) and compute density (e.g., the number of processor operations per square millimeter of die). Furthermore, prior art video processors are generally not suited to a linear scaling performance requirement, such as in a case where a video device is expected to handle multiple video streams (e.g., the simultaneous handling of multiple incoming streams and outgoing display streams).
Thus what is needed, is a new video processor system that overcomes the limitations on the prior art. The new video processor system should be scalable and have a high compute density to handle the sophisticated video processor functions expected by increasingly sophisticated users.
Embodiments of the present invention provide a new video processor system that supports sophisticated video processing functions while making efficient use of integrated circuit silicon die area, transistor count, memory speed requirements, and the like. Embodiments of the present invention maintain high compute density and are readily scalable to handle multiple video streams.
In one embodiment, the present invention is implemented as a video processor for executing video processing operations. The video processor includes a host interface for implementing communication between the video processor and a host CPU. The video processor includes a memory interface for implementing communication between the video processor and a frame buffer memory. A scalar execution unit is coupled to the host interface and the memory interface and is configured to execute scalar video processing operations. A vector execution unit is coupled to the host interface and the memory interface and is configured to execute vector video processing operations. The video processor can be a standalone video processor integrated circuit or can be a component integrated into a GPU integrated circuit.
In one embodiment, the scalar execution unit functions as a controller of the video processor and controls the operation of the vector execution unit. The scalar execution unit can be configured to execute flow control algorithms of an application and the vector execution unit can be configured to execute pixel processing operations of the application. A vector interface unit can be included in the video processor for interfacing the scalar execution unit with the vector execution unit. In one embodiment, the scalar execution unit and the vector execution unit are configured to operate asynchronously. The scalar execution unit can execute at a first clock frequency and the vector execution unit can execute at a different clock frequency (e.g., faster, slower, etc.). The vector execution unit can operate on a demand driven basis under the control of the scalar execution unit.
The present invention is illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings and in which like reference numerals refer to similar elements and in which:
Reference will now be made in detail to the preferred embodiments of the present invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While the invention will be described in conjunction with the preferred embodiments, it will be understood that they are not intended to limit the invention to these embodiments. On the contrary, the invention is intended to cover alternatives, modifications and equivalents, which may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Furthermore, in the following detailed description of embodiments of the present invention, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will be recognized by one of ordinary skill in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, components, and circuits have not been described in detail as not to unnecessarily obscure aspects of the embodiments of the present invention.
Notation and Nomenclature:
Some portions of the detailed descriptions, which follow, are presented in terms of procedures, steps, logic blocks, processing, and other symbolic representations of operations on data bits within a computer memory. These descriptions and representations are the means used by those skilled in the data processing arts to most effectively convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. A procedure, computer executed step, logic block, process, etc., is here, and generally, conceived to be a self-consistent sequence of steps or instructions leading to a desired result. The steps are those requiring physical manipulations of physical quantities. Usually, though not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical or magnetic signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared, and otherwise manipulated in a computer system. It has proven convenient at times, principally for reasons of common usage, to refer to these signals as bits, values, elements, symbols, characters, terms, numbers, or the like.
It should be borne in mind, however, that all of these and similar terms are to be associated with the appropriate physical quantities and are merely convenient labels applied to these quantities. Unless specifically stated otherwise as apparent from the following discussions, it is appreciated that throughout the present invention, discussions utilizing terms such as “processing” or “accessing” or “executing” or “storing” or “rendering” or the like, refer to the action and processes of a computer system (e.g., computer system 100 of
Computer System Platform:
It should be appreciated that the GPU 110 can be implemented as a discrete component, a discrete graphics card designed to couple to the computer system 100 via a connector (e.g., AGP slot, PCI-Express slot, etc.), a discrete integrated circuit die (e.g., mounted directly on the motherboard), or as an integrated GPU included within the integrated circuit die of a computer system chipset component (e.g., integrated within the bridge chip 105). Additionally, a local graphics memory can be included for the GPU 110 for high bandwidth graphics data storage. Additionally, it should be appreciated that the GPU 110 and the video processor unit 111 can be integrated onto the same integrated circuit die (e.g., as component 120) or can be separate discrete integrated circuit components otherwise connected to, or mounted on, the motherboard of computer system 100.
In the
The
In one embodiment, the vector execution unit 202 is configured to function as a slave co-processor to the scalar execution unit 201. In such an embodiment, the scalar execution unit manages the workload of the vector execution unit 202 by feeding control streams to vector execution unit 202 and managing the data input/output for vector execution unit 202. The control streams typically comprise functional parameters, subroutine arguments, and the like. In a typical video processing application, the control flow of the application's processing algorithm will be executed on the scalar execution unit 201, whereas actual pixel/data processing operations will be implemented on the vector execution unit 202.
Referring still to
In the
In the
The scalar execution unit 201 provides the data and command inputs for the vector execution unit 202. In one embodiment, the scalar execution unit 201 sends function calls to the vector execution unit 202 using a memory mapped command FIFO 225. Vector execution unit 202 commands are queued in this command FIFO 225.
The use of the command FIFO 225 effectively decouples the scalar execution unit 201 from the vector execution unit 202. The scalar execution unit 201 can function on its own respective clock, operating at its own respective clock frequency that can be distinct from, and separately controlled from, the clock frequency of the vector execution unit 202.
The command FIFO 225 enables the vector execution unit 202 to operate as a demand driven unit. For example, work can be handed off from the scalar execution unit 201 to command FIFO 225, and then accessed by the vector execution unit 202 for processing in a decoupled asynchronous manner. The vector execution unit 202 would thus process its workload as needed, or as demanded, by the scalar execution unit 201. Such functionality would allow the vector execution unit 202 to conserve power (e.g., by reducing/stopping one or more internal clocks) when maximum performance is not required.
The partitioning of video processing functions into a scalar portion (e.g., for execution by the scalar execution unit 201) and a vector portion (e.g., for execution by the vector execution unit 202) allow video processing programs built for the video processor 111 to be compiled into separate scalar software code and vector software code. The scalar software code and the vector software code can be compiled separately and subsequently linked together to form a coherent application.
The partitioning allows vector software code functions to be written separately and distinct from the scalar software code functions. For example, the vector functions can be written separately (e.g., at a different time, by different team of engineers, etc.) and can be provided as one or more subroutines or library functions for use by/with the scalar functions (e.g., scalar threads, processes, etc.). This allows a separate independent update of the scalar software code and/or the vector software code. For example, a vector subroutine can be independently updated (e.g., through an update of the previously distributed program, a new feature added to increase the functionality of the distributed program, etc.) from a scalar subroutine, or vice versa. The partitioning is facilitated by the separate respective caches of the scalar processor 210 (e.g., caches 211-212) and the vector control unit 220 and vector datapath 221 (e.g., caches 222-223). As described above, the scalar execution unit 201 and the vector execution unit 202 communicate via the command FIFO 225.
The software program 300 example of the
As shown in
The scalar thread is responsible for following:
The typical execution model of the scalar thread is “fire-and-forget”. The term fire-and-forget refers to the attribute whereby, for a typical model for a video baseband processing application, commands and data are sent to the vector execution unit 202 from the scalar execution unit 201 (e.g., via the command FIFO 225) and there is no return data from the vector execution unit 202 until the algorithm completes.
In the program 300 example of
It should be noted that the software program 300 example would be more complex in those cases where there are two or more vector execution pipelines (e.g., vector datapath 221 and second vector datapath 231 of
Thus, as described above in the discussion of
In one embodiment, upon receiving these commands the vector execution unit 202 immediately schedules the memRd commands to memory interface 203 (e.g., to read the requested data from the frame buffer 205). The vector execution unit 202 also examines the execute commands and prefetches the vector subroutine to be executed (if not present in the cache 222).
The objective of the vector execution unit 202 in this situation is to schedule ahead the instruction and data steams of the next few executes while the vector execution unit 202 is working on current execute. The schedule ahead features effectively hide the latency involved in fetching instructions/data from their memory locations. In order to make these read requests ahead of time, the vector execution unit 202, the datastore (e.g., datastore 223), and the instruction cache (e.g., cache 222) are implemented by using high speed optimized hardware.
As described above, the datastore (e.g., datastore 223) functions as the working RAM of the vector execution unit 202. The scalar execution unit 201 perceives and interacts with the datastore as if it were a collection of FIFOs. The FIFOs comprise the “streams” with which the video processor 111 operates. In one embodiment, streams are generally input/output FIFOs that the scalar execution unit 201 initiates the transfers (e.g., to the vector execution unit 202) into. As described above, the operation of the scalar execution unit 201 and the vector execution unit 202 are decoupled.
Once the input/output streams are full, a DMA engine within the vector control unit 220 stops processing the command FIFO 225. This soon leads to the command FIFO 225 being full. The scalar execution unit 201 stops issuing additional work to the vector execution unit 202 when the command FIFO 225 is full.
In one embodiment, the vector execution unit 202 may need intermediate streams in addition to the input and output streams. Thus the entire datastore 223 can be seen as a collection of streams with respect to the interaction with the scalar execution unit 201.
In one embodiment, each stream comprises a FIFO of working 2D chunks of data called “tiles”. In such an embodiment, the vector execution unit 202 maintains a read tile pointer and a write tile pointer for each stream. For example, for input streams, when a vector subroutine is executed, the vector subroutine can consume, or read, from a current (read) tile. In the background, data is transferred to the current (write) tile by memRd commands. The vector execution unit can also produce output tiles for output streams. These tiles are then moved to memory by memWr( ) commands that follow the execute commands. This effectively pre-fetches tiles and has them ready to be operated on, effectively hiding the latency.
In the
Referring still to
As described above, the datastore 223 utilizes a look ahead prefetch method to hide latency. Because of this, a stream can have data in two or more tiles as the data is prefetched for the appropriate vector datapath execution hardware (e.g., depicted as FIFO n, n+1, n+2, etc.).
Once the datastore is loaded, the FIFOs are accessed by the vector datapath hardware 221 and operated upon by the vector subroutine (e.g., subroutine 430). The results of the vector datapath operation comprises an output stream 403. This output stream is copied by the scalar execution unit 201 via the DMA engine 401 back into the frame buffer memory 205 (e.g., ARGB_OUT 415). This shown by the line 425.
Thus, embodiments of the present invention utilize an important aspect of stream processing, which is the fact that data storage and memory is abstracted as a plurality of memory titles. Hence, a stream can be viewed as a sequentially accessed collection of tiles. Streams are used to prefetch data. This data is in the form of tiles. The tiles are prefetched to hide latency from the particular memory source the data originates from (e.g., system memory, frame buffer memory, or the like). Similarly, the streams can be destined for different locations (e.g., caches for vector execution unit, caches for scalar execution unit, frame buffer memory, system memory, etc.). Another characteristic of streams is that they generally access tiles in a lookahead prefetching mode. As described above, the higher the latency, the deeper the prefetching and the more buffering that is used per stream (e.g., as depicted in
In the
In the
Generally, a programmer's view of the vector execution unit 202 is as a SIMD datapath with 2 DAGs 503. Instructions are issued in VLIW manner (e.g., instructions are issued for the vector datapath 504 and address generators 503 simultaneously) and are decoded and dispatched to the appropriate execution unit by the instruction decoder 501. The instructions are of variable length, with the most commonly used instructions encoded in short form. The full instruction set is available in the long form, as VLIW type instructions.
The legend 502 shows three clock cycles having three such VLIW instructions. In accordance with the legend 510, the uppermost of the VLIW instructions 502 comprises two address instructions (e.g., for the 2 DSGs 503) and one instruction for the vector datapath 504. The middle VLIW instruction comprises one integer instruction (e.g., for the integer unit 505), one address instruction, and one vector instruction. The lower most VLIW instruction comprises a branch instruction (e.g., for the branch unit 506), one address instruction, and one vector instruction.
The vector execution unit can be configured to have a single data pipe or multiple data pipes. Each data pipe consists of local RAM (e.g., a datastore 511), a crossbar 516, 2 DAGs 503, and a SIMD execution unit (e.g., the vector datapath 504).
Six different ports (e.g., 4 read and 2 write) can be accessed via an address register file unit 515. These registers receive parameters from the scalar execution unit or from the results of the integer unit 505 or the address unit 503. The DAGs 503 also function as a collection controller and manages the distribution of the registers to address the contents of the datastore 511 (e.g., RA0, RA1, RA2, RA3, WA0, and WA1). A crossbar 516 is coupled to allocate the output data ports R0, R1, R2, R3 in any order/combination into the vector datapath 504 to implement a given instruction. The output of the vector datapath 504 for can be fed back into the datastore 511 as indicated (e.g., W0). A constant RAM 517 is used to provide frequently used operands from the integer unit 505 to the vector datapath 504, and the datastore 511.
Additionally, the data store 610 visually depicts a logical tile in a stream. In the
The banks 601-604 are configured to support accesses to different tiles of each bank. For example, in one case, the crossbar 516 can access a 2×4 set of tiles from bank 601 (e.g., the first two rows of bank 601). In another case, the crossbar 516 can access a 1×8 set of tiles from two adjacent banks. Similarly, in another case, the crossbar 516 can access an 8×1 set of tiles from two adjacent banks. In each case, the DAGs/collector 503 can receive the tiles as the banks are accessed by the crossbar 516, and provide those tiles to the front end of the vector datapath 504 on a per clock basis.
In this manner, embodiments of the present invention provide a new video processor architecture that supports sophisticated video processing functions while making efficient use of integrated circuit silicon die area, transistor count, memory speed requirements, and the like. Embodiments of the present invention maintain high compute density and are readily scalable to handle multiple video streams. Embodiments of the present invention can provide a number of sophisticated video processing operations such as, for example, MPEG-2/WMV9/H.264 encode assist (e.g., In-loop decoder), MPEG-2/WMV9/H.264 decode (e.g., post entropy decoding), and In Loop/Out of loop deblocking filters.
Additional video processing operations provided by embodiments of the present invention include, for example, advanced motion adaptive deinterlacing, input noise filtering for encoding, polyphase scaling/resampling, and sub-picture compositing. The video processor architecture of the present invention can also be used for certain video processor-amplifier (procamp) applications such as, for example, color space conversion, color space adjustments, pixel point operations such as sharpening, histogram adjustment, and various video surface format conversions.
The foregoing descriptions of specific embodiments of the present invention have been presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed, and many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the claims appended hereto and their equivalents.
This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/628,414, filed on Nov. 15, 2004, to Gadre et al., entitled “A METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR VIDEO PROCESSING” which is incorporated herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3091657 | John K. Stuessel | May 1963 | A |
3614740 | Delagi et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
3987291 | Gooding et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4101960 | Stokes et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4541046 | Nagashima et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4566005 | Apperley et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4748585 | Chiarulli et al. | May 1988 | A |
4897717 | Hamilton et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4958303 | Assarpour et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4965716 | Sweeney | Oct 1990 | A |
4965751 | Thayer et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4985848 | Pfeiffer et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5040109 | Bowhill et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5047975 | Patti et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5175828 | Hall et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5179530 | Genusov et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5197130 | Chen et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5210834 | Zurawski et al. | May 1993 | A |
5263136 | DeAguiar et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5327369 | Ashkenazi | Jul 1994 | A |
5357623 | Megory-Cohen | Oct 1994 | A |
5375223 | Meyers et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5388206 | Poulton et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5388245 | Wong | Feb 1995 | A |
5418973 | Ellis et al. | May 1995 | A |
5430841 | Tannenbaum et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5430884 | Beard et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5432905 | Hsieh et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5517666 | Ohtani et al. | May 1996 | A |
5522080 | Harvey | May 1996 | A |
5560030 | Guttag et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5561808 | Kuma et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5574944 | Stager | Nov 1996 | A |
5627988 | Oldfield | May 1997 | A |
5644753 | Ebrahim et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5649173 | Lentz | Jul 1997 | A |
5666169 | Ohki et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5682552 | Kuboki et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5682554 | Harrell | Oct 1997 | A |
5706478 | Dye | Jan 1998 | A |
5754191 | Mills et al. | May 1998 | A |
5761476 | Martell | Jun 1998 | A |
5764243 | Baldwin | Jun 1998 | A |
5784590 | Cohen et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784640 | Asghar et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5796974 | Goddard et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5802574 | Atallah et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809524 | Singh et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812147 | Van Hook et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5835788 | Blumer et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5848254 | Hagersten | Dec 1998 | A |
5920352 | Inoue | Jul 1999 | A |
5925124 | Hilgendorf et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5940090 | Wilde | Aug 1999 | A |
5940858 | Green | Aug 1999 | A |
5949410 | Fung | Sep 1999 | A |
5950012 | Shiell et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5978838 | Mohamed et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999199 | Larson | Dec 1999 | A |
6009454 | Dummermuth | Dec 1999 | A |
6016474 | Kim et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6041399 | Terada et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6049672 | Shiell et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6073158 | Nally et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6092094 | Ireton | Jul 2000 | A |
6108766 | Hahn et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112019 | Chamdani et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6131152 | Ang et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141740 | Mahalingaiah et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144392 | Rogers | Nov 2000 | A |
6150610 | Sutton | Nov 2000 | A |
6189068 | Witt et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192073 | Reader et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192458 | Arimilli et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208361 | Gossett | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209078 | Chiang et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6222552 | Haas et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230254 | Senter et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6239810 | Van Hook et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6247094 | Kumar et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252610 | Hussain | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6292886 | Makineni et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301600 | Petro et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314493 | Luick | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6317819 | Morton | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6351808 | Joy et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6370617 | Lu et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6437789 | Tidwell et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438664 | McGrath et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6480927 | Bauman | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6490654 | Wickeraad et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6496902 | Faanes et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6499090 | Hill et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6525737 | Duluk, Jr. et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6529201 | Ault et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6556197 | Van Hook et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6597357 | Thomas | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6603481 | Kawai et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6624818 | Mantor et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629188 | Minkin et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631423 | Brown et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6631463 | Floyd et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6657635 | Hutchins et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6658447 | Cota-Robles | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6674841 | Johns et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6700588 | MacInnis et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6715035 | Colglazier et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6732242 | Hill et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6809732 | Zatz et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6812929 | Lavelle et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825843 | Allen et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825848 | Fu et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6839062 | Aronson et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6862027 | Andrews et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6891543 | Wyatt | May 2005 | B2 |
6915385 | Leasure et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6944744 | Ahmed et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6952214 | Naegle et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6965982 | Nemawarkar | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6975324 | Valmiki et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6976126 | Clegg et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6978149 | Morelli et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6978457 | Johl et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6981106 | Bauman et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6985151 | Bastos et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7015909 | Morgan, III et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7031330 | Bianchini, Jr. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7032097 | Alexander et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7035979 | Azevedo et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7148888 | Huang | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7151544 | Emberling | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7154500 | Heng et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7159212 | Schenk et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7185178 | Barreh et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7202872 | Paltashev et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7249350 | Wang et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7260677 | Vartti et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7305540 | Trivedi et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7321787 | Kim | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7334110 | Faanes et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7369815 | Kang et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7373478 | Yamazaki | May 2008 | B2 |
7406698 | Richardson | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7412570 | Moll et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7486290 | Kilgariff et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7487305 | Hill et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7493452 | Eichenberger et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7545381 | Huang et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7564460 | Boland et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7750913 | Parenteau et al. | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7777748 | Bakalash et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7852341 | Rouet et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7869835 | Zu | Jan 2011 | B1 |
8020169 | Yamasaki | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8427490 | Luu et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
20010026647 | Morita | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020116595 | Morton | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020130874 | Baldwin | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020144061 | Faanes et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020194430 | Cho | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030001847 | Doyle et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030003943 | Bajikar | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014457 | Desai et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030016217 | Vlachos et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030016844 | Numaoka | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030031258 | Wang et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030067473 | Taylor et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030172326 | Coffin, III et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030188118 | Jackson | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204673 | Venkumahanti et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204680 | Hardage, Jr. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030227461 | Hux et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040012597 | Zatz et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040073771 | Chen et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073773 | Demjanenko | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040103253 | Kamei et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040193837 | Devaney et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040205326 | Sindagi et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040212730 | MacInnis et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215887 | Starke | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040221117 | Shelor | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040263519 | Andrews et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050012759 | Valmiki et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050024369 | Xie | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050071722 | Biles | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050088448 | Hussain et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050239518 | D'Agostino et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050262332 | Rappoport et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050280652 | Hutchins et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060020843 | Frodsham et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060064517 | Oliver | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064547 | Kottapalli et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060103659 | Karandikar et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060152519 | Hutchins et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060152520 | Gadre et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060176308 | Karandikar et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060176309 | Gadre et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070076010 | Swamy et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070130444 | Mitu et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070285427 | Morein et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080016327 | Menon et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080278509 | Washizu et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090235051 | Codrescu et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20120023149 | Kinsman et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
29606102 | Jun 1996 | DE |
07-101885 | Apr 1995 | JP |
H08-077347 | Mar 1996 | JP |
H08-153032 | Jun 1996 | JP |
08-297605 | Nov 1996 | JP |
09-287217 | Oct 1997 | JP |
09-287217 | Nov 1997 | JP |
H09-325759 | Dec 1997 | JP |
10-222476 | Aug 1998 | JP |
11-190447 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2000-148695 | May 2000 | JP |
11-190447 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2003-178294 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2004-252990 | Sep 2004 | JP |
413766 | Dec 2000 | TW |
436710 | May 2001 | TW |
442734 | Jun 2001 | TW |
Entry |
---|
FOLDOC, definition of “vector processor”, http://foldoc.org/, Sep. 11, 2003. |
Wikipedia, definition of “vector processor”, http://en.wikipedia.org/, May 14, 2007. |
Fisher, Joseph A., Very Long Instruction Word Architectures and the ELI-512, ACM, 1993, pp. 140-150. |
Free On-Line Dictionary of Computing (FOLDOC), definition of “video”, from foldoc.org/index.cgi?query=video&action=Search, May 23, 2008. |
FOLDOC, definition of “frame buffer”, from foldoc.org/index.cgi?query=frame+buffer&action=Search, Oct. 3, 1997. |
PCreview, article entitled “What is a Motherboard”, from www.pcreview.co.uk/articles/Hardware/What—is—a—Motherboard/, Nov. 22, 2005. |
FOLDOC, definition of “motherboard”, from foldoc.org/index.cgi?query=motherboard&action=Search, Ausuts 10, 2000. |
FOLDOC, definition of “separate compilation”, from foldoc.org/index.cgi?query=separate+compilation&action=Search, Feb. 19, 2005. |
Definition of “queue” from Free on-Line Dictionary of Computing (FOLDOC), http://foldoc.org/index.cgi?query=queue&action=Search, May 15, 2007. |
Definition of “first-in first-out” from FOLDOC, http://foldoc.org/index.cgi?query=fifo&action=Search, Dec. 6, 1999. |
Definition of “block” from FOLDOC, http://foldoc.org/index.cgi?block, Sep. 23, 2004. |
Graf, Rudolf F., Modern Dictionary of Electronics, Sixth Edition, Howard W. Sams & Company, 1984, pp. 566. |
Wikipedia, definition of “Subroutine”, published Nov. 29, 2003, four pages. |
Rosenberg, Jerry M., Dictionary of Computers, Information Processing & Telecommunications, Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons, 1987, pp. 102 and 338. |
Rosenberg, Jerry M., Dictionary of Computers, Information Processing & Telecommunications,, 2nd edition, 1987. |
FOLDOC, definition of Pentium, Sep. 30, 2003. |
FOLDOC, definition of X86, Feb. 27, 2004. |
Graham, Susan L., “Getting Up to Speed: The Future of Supercomputing”, The National Academies Press, 2005, glossary. |
Intel, Intel Architecture Software Developer's Manual, vol. 1: Basic Architecture, 1997, p. 8-1. |
Intel, Intel Architecture Software Developer's Manual, vol. 1: Basic Architecture, 1999, p. 8-1, 9-1. |
Intel, Intel MMX Technology at a Glance, Jun. 1997. |
Intel, Intel Pentium III Xeon Processor at 500 and 550Mhz, Feb. 1999. |
Intel, Pentium Processor Family Developer's Manual, 1997, pp. 2-13. |
Intel, Pentium Processor with MMX Technology at 233Mhz Performance Brief, Jan. 1998. |
Wikipedia, definition of scalar processor, Oct. 22, 2007. |
Wikipedia, SIMD entry, Feb. 22, 2008. |
Gadre, S., Patent Application Entitled “Separately Schedulable Condition Codes for a Video Processor”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,793, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
Lew et al, Patent Application Entitled “A Programmable DMA Engine for Implementing Memory Transfers For a Video Processor”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,777, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
Karandikar et al., Patent Application Entitled “A Pipelined L2 Cache For Memory Transfers For a Video Processor”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,606, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
Karandikar et al., Patent Application Entitled “Command Acceleration in a Video Processor”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/267,640, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
Karandikar et al., Patent Application Entitled “A Configurable SIMD Engine in a Video Processor”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,393, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
Karandikar et al., Patent Application Entitled “Context Switching on a Video Processor Having a Scalar Execution Unit and a Vector Execution Unit”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,778, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
Lew et al., Patent Application Entitled “Multi Context Execution on a Video Processor”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,780, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
Su et al., Patent Application No. “State Machine Control for a Pipelined L2 Cache to Implement Memory Transfers For a Video Processor”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,119, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
Fisher, Joseph A., “Very Long Instruction Word Architecture and the ELI-512”, ACM, 1993, pp. 140-150. |
Quinnell, Richard A. “New DSP Architectures Go “Post-Harvard” for Higher Performance and Flexibility” Techonline; posted May 1, 2002. |
Wikipedia, definition of Multiplication, accessed from en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Multiplication&oldid=1890974, published Oct. 13, 2003. |
Graf, Rudolf F., Modern Dictionary of Electronics, Howard W. Sams & Company, 1988, pp. 273. |
IBM TDB, Device Queue Management, vol. 31 Iss. 10, pp. 45-50, Mar. 1, 1989. |
Hamacher, V. Carl et al., Computer Organization, Second Edition, McGraw Hill, 1984, pp. 1-9. |
Graham, Susan L. et al., Getting Up to Speed: The future of Supercomputing, the National Academies Press, 2005, glossary. |
Rosenberg, Jerry M., Dictionary of Computers, Information Processing & Telecommunications, 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, 1987, pp. 305. |
Graston et al. (Software Pipelining Irregular Loops on the TMS320C6000 VLIW DSP Architecture); Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN workshop on Languages, compilers and tools for embedded systems; pp. 138-144; Year of Publication: 2001. |
Foldoc, definition of “superscalar,” http://foldoc.org/, Jun. 22, 2009. |
SearchStorage.com Definitions, “Pipeline Burst Cache,” Jul. 31, 2001, url: http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid5—gci214414,00.html. |
Karandikar et al., Patent Application Entitled: “Multidemnsional Datapath Processing in a Video Processor”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,638, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
Gadre, S., Patent Application Entitled “Stream Processing in a Video Processor”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,599, filed Date Nov. 4, 2005. |
Merriam-Webster Dictionary Online; Definition for “program”; retrieved Dec. 14, 2010. |
Nvidia Corporation, Technical Brief: Transform and Lighting; dated 1999; month unknown. |
Foldoc, Free Online Dictionary of Computing, defintion of SIMD, foldoc.org/index.cgi?query=simd&action=Search, Nov. 4, 1994. |
Woods J., Nvidia GeForce FX Preview, at http://www.tweak3d.net/reviews/nvidia/nv30preview/1.shtml; dated Nov. 18, 2002; retrieved Jun. 16, 2011. |
Wilson D., NVIDIA's Tiny 90nm G71 and G73: GeForce 7900 and 7600 Debut; at http://www.anandtech.com/show/1967/2; dated Sep. 3, 2006, retrieved Jun. 16, 2011. |
Hutchins E., SC10: A Video Processor and Pixel-Shading GPU for Handheld Devices; presented at the Hot Chips conferences on Aug. 23, 2004. |
HPL-PD A Parameterized Research Approach—May 31, 2004 http://web/archive.org/web/*/www.trimaran.org/docs/5—hpl-pd.pdf. |
Kozyrakis, “A Media enhanced vector architecture for embedded memory systems,” Jul. 1999, http://digitalassets.lib.berkeley.edu/techreports/ucb/text/CSD-99/1059.pdf. |
Karandikar et al., Patent Application Entitled: “A Latency Tolerant System for Executing Video Processing Operations”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,875, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
Parhami, Behrooz, Computer Arithmetic: Algorithms and Hardware Designs, Oxford University Press, Jun. 2000, pp. 413-418. |
gDEBugger, graphicRemedy, http://www.gremedy.com, Aug. 8, 2006. |
Duca et al., A Relational Debugging Engine for Graphics Pipeline, International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, ACM Siggraph 2005, pp. 453-463, ISSN:0730-0301. |
“Vertex Fog”; http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/directx9—c/Vertex—fog.asp?frame=true. |
“Anti-aliasing”; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-aliasing. |
“Alpha Testing State”; http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/directx9—c/directx/graphics/programmingguide/GettingStarted/Direct3Kdevices/States/renderstates/alphatestingstate.asp. |
Brown, Brian; “Data Structure and Number Systems”; 2000; http://www.ibilce.unesp.br/courseware/datas/data3.htm. |
Heirich; Optimal Automatic Mulit-pass Shader Partitioning by Dynamic Programming; Eurographics—Graphics Hardware (2005); Jul. 2005. |
Foley et al. Computer Graphics: Principles and Practice; Second Edition in C; pp. 866-867; Addison-Wesley 1997. |
Defintion of “Slot,” http://www.thefreedictionary.com/slot, Oct. 2, 2012. |
Korean Intellectual Property Office; English Abstract for Publication No. 100262453, corresponding to application 1019970034995, 2001. |
Espasa R et al: “Decoupled vector architectures”, High-Performance Computer Architecture, 1996. Proceedings., Second International Symposium on San Jose, CA, USA FEB. 3-7, 1996, Los Alamitos, CA, USA IEEE Comput. Soc, US, Feb. 3, 1996, pp. 281-290, XPO1 0162067, DOI:10.11 09/HPCA:1996.501193 ISBN: 978-0-8186-7237-8. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060176309 A1 | Aug 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60628414 | Nov 2004 | US |