The present invention relates to software applications. More particularly, the present invention relates to managing software applications over a network.
In the past, the process of installing and updating applications as well as sharing information on a plurality of computers was arduous and time-consuming. Professionals would install software on each computer using compact discs (CDs), network shares or other similar methods. As mentioned, this is time-consuming as well as difficult to synchronize throughout an entire company. With the advent of computer networking, where a plurality of computers communicate together, the process became much more streamlined. Specifically, two techniques for delivering applications have been developed over the years, remote execution and local delivery.
In a remote execution embodiment, a user accesses software which is loaded and executed on a remote server under the control of the user. One example is the use of Internet-accessible CGI programs which are executed by Internet servers based on data entered by a client. A more complex system is the Win-to-Net system provided by Menta Software. This system delivers client software to the user which is used to create a Microsoft® Windows® style application window on the client machine. The client software interacts with an application program executing on the server and displays a window, which corresponds to one which would be shown if the application were installed locally. The client software is further configured to direct certain I/O operations, such as printing a file, to the client's system, to replicate the “feel” of a locally running application. Other remote-access systems, such as provided by Citrix Systems, are accessed through a conventional Internet Browser or a proprietary client and present the user with a “remote desktop” generated by a host computer which is used to execute the software.
Since the applications are already installed on the server system, remote execution permits the user to access the programs without transferring a large amount of data. However, this type of implementation requires the supported software to be installed on the server. Thus, the server must utilize an operating system which is suitable for the hosted software. In addition, the server must support separately executing program threads for each user of the hosted software. For complex software packages, the necessary resources can be significant, limiting both the number of concurrent users of the software and the number of separate applications which can be provided.
In a local delivery embodiment, the desired application is packaged and downloaded to the user's computer. Preferably, the applications are delivered and installed as appropriate using automated processes. After installation, the application is executed. Various techniques have been employed to improve the delivery of software, particularly in the automated selection of the proper software components to install and initiation of automatic software downloads. In one technique, an application program is broken into parts at natural division points, such as individual data and library files, class definitions, etc., and each component is specially tagged by the program developer to identify the various program components, specify which components are dependent upon each other, and define the various component sets which are needed for different versions of the application.
Once such tagging format is defined in the Open Software Description (“OSD”) specification, jointly submitted to the World Wide Web Consortium by Marimba Incorporated and Microsoft Corporation on Aug. 13, 1999. Defined OSD information can be used by various “push” applications or other software distribution environments, such as Marimba's Castanet product, to automatically trigger downloads of software and ensure that only the needed software components are downloaded in accordance with data describing which software elements a particular version of an application depends on.
Although on-demand local delivery and execution of software using OSD/push techniques is feasible for small programs, such as simple Java applets, for large applications, the download time can be prohibitively long. Thus, while suitable for software maintenance, this system is impractical for providing local application services on-demand because of the potentially long time between when the download begins and the software begins local execution.
In the more recent past, attempts have been made to use streaming technology to deliver software to permit an application to begin executing before it has been completely downloaded. Streaming technology was initially developed to deliver audio and video information in a manner which allowed the information to be output without waiting for the complete data file to download. For example, a full-motion video can be sent from a server to a client as a linear stream of frames instead of a complete video file. As each frame arrives at the client, it can be displayed to create a real-time full-motion video display. However, unlike the linear sequences of data presented in audio and video, the components of a software application can be executed in sequences which vary according to user input and other factors.
To address the deficiencies in prior data streaming and local software delivery systems, an improved technique of delivering applications to a client for local execution has been developed. This technique called “Streaming Modules” is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,311,221 to Raz et al. In a particular embodiment of the “Streaming Modules” system, a computer application is divided into a set of modules, such as the various Java classes and data sets which comprise a Java applet. Once an initial module or modules are delivered to the user, the application begins to execute while additional modules are streamed in the background. The modules are streamed to the user in an order which is selected to deliver the modules before they are required by the locally executing software. The sequence of streaming can be varied in response to the manner in which the user operates the application to ensure that needed modules are delivered prior to use as often as possible. To reduce streaming time, the size of code files, such as library modules, can be reduced by substituting various coded procedures with shortened streaming “stub” procedures which act as link-time substitutes for the removed code. Suitable modules to replace are those which are not required for the initial execution of the application. As the application is running locally on the client, additional modules are streamed to the client and the stub code can be dynamically replaced as the substituted procedures are received. The stub procedure can point to a streaming engine which will request a missing procedure if the program calls it before it has been received at the client. Although effective, the stub-code substitution technique used in the “Streaming Modules” system may require a reasonable degree of processing to prepare a given application for streaming. In addition, the client software required to manage the streamed modules does not necessarily integrate cleanly with the normal routines used by the operating system executing on the client machine.
To remedy some of the remaining issues, U.S. Pat. No. 6,574,618 to Eylon et al. disclosed a method and system for executing network streamed applications. Within the system, a client computer executes an application while parts of the application code are still being retrieved from the server over a network. The additional components of the application not required for startup are continuously loaded in the background until the entire application resides on the client computer. There are a number of drawbacks with this system though. The client cannot function without the server being available. Although, the application is physically available on the client once downloaded, due to encryption or other proprietary methods of preventing unauthorized access, the application is unavailable. Further, the prior art does not permit a user to access the server and applications from multiple client locations.
What is needed is an improved system having features for addressing the problems mentioned above and new features not yet discussed. Broadly speaking, the present invention fills these needs by providing a virtual application manager. It should be appreciated that the present invention can be implemented in numerous ways, including as a method, a process, an apparatus, a system or a device. Inventive embodiments of the present invention are summarized below.
In one embodiment, a method for managing one or more applications over a network is provided. The network is connected to a server system and to a client computer. The method comprises receiving user login information; accessing a user profile associated with the login information, wherein the user profile includes a user environment configuration; selecting transport protocols based on the user profile, wherein the transport protocols are protocols for transporting information between the server system and the client computer; and synchronizing the user environment configuration with a client environment configuration on the client computer.
In another embodiment, a system for managing one or more applications over a network is provided. The system comprises a client computer including a client environment; and a server system including a database, wherein the server system is configured to be connected to the client computer via the network, to store the one or more applications, to store a user profile including a user environment configuration, and to synchronize the client environment with the user environment configuration.
In yet another embodiment, a server system for managing one or more applications over a network is provided. The server system comprises a database, wherein the server system is connected to a client computer having a client environment, to store the one or more applications, to store a user profile including a user environment configuration, and to synchronize the client environment with the user environment configuration.
In still another embodiment, a method for managing one or more applications over a network is provided. The network is connected to a server system, a first client computer and a second client computer. The method comprises receiving user login information from the second client computer; accessing a user profile associated with user login information, wherein the user profile includes a user environment configuration received from the first client computer; selecting transport protocols based on the user profile, wherein the transport protocols are protocols for transporting information between the server system and the second client computer; and synchronizing the user environment configuration with a client environment configuration on the second client computer.
The invention encompasses other embodiments are configured as set forth above and with other features and alternatives.
The present invention will be readily understood by the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. To facilitate this description, like reference numerals designate like structural elements.
An invention for a virtual application manager is disclosed. Numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be understood, however, to one skilled in the art, that the present invention may be practiced with other specific details.
Overview of a Virtual Application Manager
User profiles follow a user at network login and allow the user to run the same software defined in his user profile on different hardware devices. The server system 104 maintains login security, application catalogs, billing information for each user, and application profiles. This information, maintained at a central location, increases user flexibility and mobility by eliminating reliance on a single personal hardware device. Software is installed and maintained at a central server system 104 and can be utilized at an almost unlimited number of network locations having client computers 101.
Components of a Virtual Application Manager
The VAM 100 supports multiple server and network technologies that allow an application to appear to be installed locally. However, the application is not necessarily installed locally. The application may be installed locally at the client computer 101, installed locally with the code hosted and stored remotely on the server system 104, or stored and executed on the remote server system 104.
The VAM 100 includes but is not limited to a server transaction processor 204, an application catalog, an application installation scripter, a server relational database 206, a client program launcher 212, a client application database 210, a client processor 202, and a client environment 102.
The server transaction processor 204 is a network server processor, executing requests from a client computer 101. Such requests include but are not limited to login, send list of user applications, send list of all applications, send icon graphic file, and send application detailed information.
The application catalog is a database of applications installed on the central servers of the server system 104. The application list is transmitted via the server transaction processor 204.
The application installation scripter is distributed to clients via the server transaction processor 204. The application installation scripter contains instructions for the client processor 202 on environment updates to the client environment 102. Such updates include but are not limited to registry updates, application group, and start up menu instructions.
The server relational database 206 is a commercial relational database used to support high volume, high uptime requirements of daemon processes of the server transaction processor 204.
The client program launcher 212 is a proxy program launcher that manages which application is processed, which transport is activated, etc. Accordingly, an application is not launched directly by the user. The user launches the client program launcher, which in turn handles the launching of the application.
The client application database 210 is a transient database on the client computer 101. An entire user environment is transferred over the network 105 from the server transaction processor 204 onto this transient database created on the client computer 101. This database includes such things as the list of user applications and application descriptions.
A user login client uses the server transaction processor 204 to manage the login state of the user session, receive the user password from the client computer 101, and authenticate the username and password. When the user is authenticated, the client environment maintenance modules are activated.
The client environment maintenance modules include a client software catalog module. When the user requests to add or remove an application, the client software catalog module is activated. This module updates the user profile, adding or removing the application, and updating the personal computer environment to accommodate the new application. The application installation scripter completes the application install process, allowing immediate access to the application.
In a related technology, two transport technologies for distributed virtual applications are supported, including remote network file system technology and server based computing technology. An example of remote network file system technology is a remote network operating system remote drives. Such a system allows applications to be implemented and stored on a remote storage system, but executed locally on a personal computing device. Another example of a remote network file system technology is a virtual distributed file system. In this technology, the application code is completely hosted remotely; the applications are partially and temporarily stored and executed locally; local files may or may not be available on the local file system but will have a “backing stored” copy on a remote server. Such technology is described in further detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/912,652, entitled “Virtual Distributed File System”, filed Aug. 4, 2004, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
An example of a server based computing technology is Unix® X11 xterminal protocol. In such technology, applications are stored and run on a remote Unix® system; the screen, keystroke and mouse movements are transferred over the network 105. Another example of a server based computing technology is Citrix® Technologies and Tarantella® Technologies. In such technologies, Microsoft® Windows® or Unix® applications are stored and run on a remote Unix® or Windows® server; the screen, keystroke, audio and mouse movement data is transmitted over the network 105.
A single user on a single personal computer device supports all the transport technologies described above. Such a setup provides maximum flexibility for the system administrator and shelters the user from this higher level of complexity.
In another related technology, a communications manager handles network monitoring, troubleshooting on end-user operating environments. Network deficiencies are immediately apparent and viewable by the dashboard gauges displaying network status and performance. In cases where other network paths are available, the communications manager can select alternate paths. The communications manager manages network monitoring and troubleshooting tools, network automatic disconnect and reconnect solutions, network interface, and technology arbitration technologies.
In yet another related technology, a virtual distributed data manager manages user files and databases often associated with user applications. The virtual distributed data manager includes remote network storage management of user data, synchronization of local data to a remote location and vice versa, and secure encrypted storage and management of remote data. The virtual distributed data manager is described in further detail in concurrently filed U.S. patent application. Ser. No. 11/144,179, entitled “Transaction Based Virtual File System Optimized For High-Latency Network Connections”, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Processes of a Virtual Application Manager
The VAM 100 checks the user profile in step 408 for new applications to be installed on the client computer 101. If the VAM 100 determines in decision operation 410 that no new applications are to be installed, the synchronization process proceeds to step 414. On the other hand, if the VAM 100 determines in decision operation 410 that new applications are to be installed, the VAM 100 installs the new applications in step 412. Many applications have server based installation mechanisms provided by software vendors. In the cases where network installation is not provided, tools and technologies are built into the VAM 100. Examples of such tools include tracking of new install net change to the system and distributing custom install scripting language throughout the system. Smaller software packages run from the network substantially the same as when installed to a local drive. Larger applications are more sophisticated and often require administrator customization. The software tools help administrators tune network installations to reduce or eliminate end-user interaction with installations on end-user systems. The synchronization process 306 then proceeds to step 414.
The VAM 100 checks the user profile in step 414 for any new environment configurations. If the VAM 100 determines in decision operation 416 that no new environment configurations are available, the synchronization process proceeds to step 420. However, if the VAM 100 determines in decision operation 416 that new environment configurations are available, the VAM 100 reconfigures the environment in step 418. Environment configurations include but are not limited to registry entries, temporary file directories created and file permissions, application icons, and application links. Application icons are downloaded from the server system 104 and stored locally for use on the client computer 101. As an example, when a particular icon is not on the local client computer 101 but is part of the environment configuration, that particular icon is transferred from the server system 104 to the local client computer 101. Likewise, application links are added to the desktop, user groups, the start menu and other locations as defined by the environment configuration. The synchronization process 306 then proceeds to step 420.
The VAM 100 checks the client computer 101 in step 420 for expired applications. If the VAM 100 determines in decision operation 422 that the client computer 101 has no expired applications, the synchronization process 306 is completed. On the other hand, if the VAM 100 determines in decision operation 422 that the client computer 101 does have expired applications, the VAM 100 performs expiration procedures in step 424. Upon user login, user profiles stored on the server system 104 contain an application expiration time and date value. Each application has its own expiration stamp. The central server system 104 maintains this expiration information. Application modules are stored on the client computer 101 encrypted. Accordingly, these application modules are unavailable for use outside of the virtual application manager program launcher 212. Such encryption prevents the user from executing the software in violation of the expiration time and date stamps. For an expired application, desktop icons and start menu links disappear from the client environment 102, or are grayed out to indicate the application is inactive or unavailable. The synchronization process 306 is then completed.
Note that the steps of the synchronization process 306 may be executed in an order other than the specific order illustrated by
The VAM 100 provides, in step 608, a list of installed applications that may be associated with the selected document. As an alternative to step 608, the VAM 100 may provide another mechanism for selecting a document type. For example, the VAM 100 may respond to a user right clicking the mouse on a document by providing a list of installed applications having the ability to utilize the selected document and to read the document formats. The user may then select from the provided list of installed applications. In step 610, the VAM 100 receives the selected application association. The compatibility process 600 then proceeds to step 612.
The manager opens the file in the associated application in step 612. The compatibility process is then completed.
Performing the compatibility process 700 allows the VAM 100 to do at least the following: prevent an incompatible application from being installed on a particular environment; select the compatible version of the application to be installed; and support a user moving from one client computer to another client computer, even when the hardware and operating system are not compatible and require different applications or application versions.
If the manager determines in decision operation 706 that the application to be installed is not compatible with the particular hardware and operating system, the compatibility process 700 proceeds to step 710. In such a case, the VAM 100 does not install the application. On the other hand, if the VAM 100 determines that the application is compatible with the particular hardware and operating system, the compatibility process 700 proceeds to step 708. In such a case, the VAM 100 downloads the application from the server system 104 and installs the application on the client computer 101. The compatibility process 700 is then completed.
When a user moves to a different client computer, the user may log into the VAM 100. In such a case, the VAM 100 receives the user login information from the different computer in step 802. Such login information may contain, for example, a username and a password. Each user account has an associated user profile. The user profile includes, among other things, a list of installed applications. The user profile is editable by the user. In step 804, the VAM 100 selects the appropriate transport protocols or network access methods based on the user profile and parameters initially defined by the central administrator's installation selection. Each of the network access methods support server based remote hosted application storage or server based application execution. Accordingly, the VAM 100 can make this movement to the different client computer a process that is relatively seamless. The VAM 100, in step 806, transfers the user environment configuration stored on the server system 104 to the client environment on the different client computer.
The VAM 100 may be used in conjunction with the virtual distributed file system (VDFS), which is discussed in further detail in U.S. Provisional Pat. App. No. 60/577,148, filed Jun. 3, 2004, entitled “Virtual Management System”. Accordingly, the VAM 100 may have the ability to provide application module installation pipelining, which is a process that is initiated when a user moves to a different client computer. When a user initially logs into a new client computer, the VDFS modules transfer the statistically often-used program modules to this different client computer. Such a transfer process prevents delays when running applications on the different client computer for the first time. The VAM 100 knows the entire application set to which the user is subscribed and has statistics on how often each module is accessed. With this knowledge, the VAM 100 can initiate the preloading of often-used user applications on the client computer. The VDFS transfers only the statistically often-used modules. This process is done in the background, using network resources not used by the user. This process, thereby, does not impede network performance.
According to systems and methods described above, the VAM 100 allows a user to use and run applications on a client computer 101, while the applications are stored and managed by a centralized server system 104. The VAM 100 includes but is not limited to hardware, software, firmware or any combination thereof.
Advantageously, the user may move freely from one client computer 101 to another client computer. When a user logs into the VAM 100 using the other client computer, the user's entire user environment, or a compatible portion thereof, is transferred from the server system 104 to the other client computer. Accordingly, the user is not limited to using only one particular client computer 101. Nor is the user limited to one particular type of operating system. The user also does not have to worry about carrying around applications to be installed on other client computers. The management of the applications, the user environment configuration, the client environment configuration, the transport protocols and the access methods, among other things, are handled by the server system 104. Such central management allows software vendors to rent software packages and to control time limits on applications via the VAM 100. Software vendors can thereby manage application subscriptions, even if the software packages are stored locally on a client computer 101.
Capabilities of a Virtual Application Manager
The VAM 100 provides desirable capabilities discussed above and further highlighted in the following discussion.
Centralization—This technology provides the ability for a user to use and run applications that are stored on and managed by a centralized location.
ASP—The technology has the facilities to support an application service provider (ASP).
Enterprise—The technology can benefit business enterprise application architectures.
Robust—The VAM 100 is capable of executing and managing resource intensive applications requiring support for high CPU utilization, high-end graphics and audio support.
Movable applications—The applications defined within a user's profile will run on any hardware system the user logs into. The user can thereby move from one client computer to another and have his application follow.
Offline operation—The software applications have the ability to run disconnected from the central server and network. The applications do not have to be stored and run solely at the server system 104. The applications may be stored and run from client computer, thereby allowing offline operation.
Quick installation—the software is capable of running on a user's computer with a minimal setup delay. Minimal setup time is required to allow applications to move from one client computer to another.
Installation management—The system provides an infrastructure for systems to provide installation and configuration management.
Full software install—The software should optionally be fully installable to support full offline usage when disconnected from the network.
Patch management—User applications should be automatically updated and maintained from the central location. This allows the application of patches and updates to be managed centrally and automatically.
Scalability—The system should be scaleable to support extremely large ASP user bases over disparate network topologies.
License/subscription management—The system supports subscription licenses. So, when the subscription is void or expired, the desktop software will become disabled and inactive.
Versatile—The system provides support for disparate end user hardware, including IBM® compatible PC's, Apple® PC's, thin clients and personal digital assistants.
Multiple transports—The system will run over multiple network and application protocols, including server based computing transports created by Citrix® and Tarantella® corporations, Unix X11 xTerm® protocols, and network file access protocols including Microsoft® SMB/Netbios, Netware®, Unix NFS®, and the virtual distributed file system (VDFS).
Billing—Usage data should be available to track application usage, including access times and durations.
Subscriptions—Control over application usage has to be available to allow centrally an application's usage, such as allowing a time limit on an application, after which the application even if stored locally will expire and be inoperable.
System and Method Implementation of a Virtual Application Manager
Portions of the present invention may be conveniently implemented using a conventional general purpose or a specialized digital computer or microprocessor programmed according to the teachings of the present disclosure, as will be apparent to those skilled in the computer art.
Appropriate software coding can readily be prepared by skilled programmers based on the teachings of the present disclosure, as will be apparent to those skilled in the software art. The invention may also be implemented by the preparation of application specific integrated circuits or by interconnecting an appropriate network of conventional component circuits, as will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art.
The present invention includes a computer program product which is a storage medium (media) having instructions stored thereon/in which can be used to control, or cause, a computer to perform any of the processes of the present invention. The storage medium can include, but is not limited to, any type of disk including floppy disks, mini disks (MD's), optical disks, DVD, CD-ROMS, micro-drive, and magneto-optical disks, ROMs, RAMs, EPROMs, EEPROMs, DRAMs, VRAMs, flash memory devices (including flash cards), magnetic or optical cards, nanosystems (including molecular memory ICs), RAID devices, remote data storage/archive/warehousing, or any type of media or device suitable for storing instructions and/or data.
Stored on any one of the computer readable medium (media), the present invention includes software for controlling both the hardware of the general purpose/specialized computer or microprocessor, and for enabling the computer or microprocessor to interact with a human user or other mechanism utilizing the results of the present invention. Such software may include, but is not limited to, device drivers, operating systems, and user applications. Ultimately, such computer readable media further includes software for performing the present invention, as described above.
Included in the programming (software) of the general/specialized computer or microprocessor are software modules for implementing the teachings of the present invention, including but not limited to receiving user login information, accessing a user profile associated with the login information wherein the user profile includes a user environment configuration, selecting transport protocols based on the user profile wherein the transport protocols are protocols for transporting information between the server system and the client computer, and synchronizing the user environment configuration with a client environment configuration on the client computer, according to processes of the present invention.
In the foregoing specification, the invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments thereof. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
This Patent Application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) of the U.S. Provisional Pat. App. No. 60/577,148, filed Jun. 3, 2004, entitled “Virtual Management System”, which is hereby incorporated by reference. The Patent Application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/912,652, entitled “Virtual Distributed File System”, filed Aug. 4, 2004, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety; and concurrently filed U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/144,179, entitled “Transaction Based Virtual File System Optimized For High-Latency Network Connections”, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4866635 | Kahn et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
5602990 | Leete | Feb 1997 | A |
5649196 | Woodhill et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5659743 | Adams et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5787409 | Seiffert et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5802364 | Senator et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812751 | Ekrot et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5835911 | Nakagawa et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5897635 | Torres et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5933647 | Aronberg et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5950010 | Hesse et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5974547 | Klimenko | Oct 1999 | A |
6012152 | Douik et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6029196 | Lenz | Feb 2000 | A |
6067582 | Smith et al. | May 2000 | A |
6144959 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6170065 | Kobata et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6189101 | Dusenbury, Jr. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6209089 | Selitrennikoff et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212660 | Joeressen et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6282711 | Halpern et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6292827 | Raz | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301612 | Selitrennikoff et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311221 | Raz et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314428 | Brew et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6317761 | Landsman et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6339826 | Hayes et al. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6349137 | Hunt et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6356915 | Chtchetkine et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363400 | Chtchetkine et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366296 | Boreczky et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6378035 | Parry et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6421777 | Pierre-Louis et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6449658 | Lafe et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459499 | Tomat | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463530 | Sposato | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473794 | Guheen et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477531 | Sullivan et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6490677 | Aquilar et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6536037 | Guheen et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6553375 | Huang et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556950 | Schwenke et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6574618 | Eylon et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6578142 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6606744 | Mikurak | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6625651 | Swartz et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6625754 | Aguilar et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6633782 | Schleiss et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6636857 | Thomas et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6654797 | Kamper | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654801 | Mann et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6694375 | Beddus et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697852 | Ryu | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6704886 | Gill et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6718464 | Cromer et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6728530 | Heinonen et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6735625 | Ponna | May 2004 | B1 |
6751658 | Haun et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6757729 | Devarakonda et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6757894 | Eylon et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6816462 | Booth, III et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6816882 | Conner et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6820180 | McBrearty et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6854009 | Hughes | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6871210 | Subramanian | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6880108 | Gusler et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6885481 | Dawe | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6886020 | Zahavi et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6915343 | Brewer et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6954853 | Wang et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6954930 | Drake et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6959235 | Abdel-Malek et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6985967 | Hipp | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7003560 | Mullen et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7003663 | Lagosanto et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7024471 | George et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7058698 | Chatterjee et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7080118 | Hildebrand | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7143307 | Witte et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7149698 | Guheen et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7175078 | Ban et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7178166 | Taylor et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7194445 | Chan et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7200779 | Coss, Jr. et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7210143 | Or et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7237122 | Kadam et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7260597 | Hofrichter et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7287053 | Bodin | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7328367 | Ukai et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7337311 | Chen et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7392046 | Leib et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7401125 | Uchida et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7480822 | Arbon et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7487383 | Bensinger | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7512584 | Keith, Jr. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7571467 | Priestley et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7624086 | Keith, Jr. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7627694 | Sreenivasan et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7664834 | Keith, Jr. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7698487 | Rothman et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7752486 | Satran et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7788524 | Wing et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7840514 | Keith, Jr. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7844686 | Keith, Jr. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7908339 | Keith, Jr. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7912902 | Cheng et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8099378 | Keith, Jr. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8126722 | Robb et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8175418 | Keith, Jr. | May 2012 | B1 |
8234238 | Keith, Jr. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8307239 | Keith, Jr. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8423821 | Keith, Jr. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
20010034736 | Eylon et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010037323 | Moulton et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010037399 | Eylon et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010037400 | Raz et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010044850 | Raz et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010049793 | Sugimoto | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020007418 | Hegde et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013827 | Edstrom et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020035674 | Vetrivelkumaran et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020042833 | Hendler et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049764 | Boothby et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020083183 | Pujare et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087625 | Toll et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020087717 | Artzi et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020087883 | Wohlgemuth et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020087963 | Eylon et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091763 | Shah et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020094868 | Tuck et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099934 | Cromer et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020104080 | Woodard et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107920 | Hotti | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107945 | George et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116585 | Scherr | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020124092 | Urien | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020129089 | Hegde et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020131404 | Mehta et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138640 | Raz et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020157089 | Patel et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161868 | Paul et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161908 | Benitez et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020169797 | Hegde et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020188941 | Cicciarelli et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004882 | Holler et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030005096 | Paul et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009538 | Shah et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030031164 | Nabkel et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030033379 | Civanlar et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030036882 | Harper et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037328 | Cicciarelli et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030041136 | Cheline et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046371 | Falkner | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030051128 | Rodriguez et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055878 | Fletcher et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061067 | Atwal et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030078960 | Murren et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030110188 | Howard et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120502 | Robb et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030126242 | Chang | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140160 | Raz et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030177381 | Ofek et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030191730 | Adkins et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204562 | Hwang | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030233383 | Koskimies | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233493 | Boldon et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040010716 | Childress et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040068554 | Bales et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073787 | Ban et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040093492 | Daude et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040104927 | Husain et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040107273 | Biran et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040123153 | Wright et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128346 | Melamed et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148306 | Moulton et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040180721 | Rowe | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193876 | Donley et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040201604 | Kraenzel et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040236843 | Wing et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243650 | McCrory et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040243928 | Hesmer et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050027846 | Wolfe et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033808 | Cheng et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050044197 | Lai | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050044544 | Slivka et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050060281 | Bucher et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071267 | Takahashi et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050096920 | Matz et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108297 | Rollin et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108546 | Lehew et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108593 | Purushothaman et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050144218 | Heintz | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149729 | Zimmer et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050160289 | Shay | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050188315 | Campbell et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050193245 | Hayden et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198196 | Bohn et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198239 | Hughes | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216524 | Gomes et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216902 | Schaefer | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050226059 | Kavuri et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050256952 | Mouhanna et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050262503 | Kane | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050268145 | Hufferd et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273486 | Keith, Jr. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283606 | Williams | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050286435 | Ogawa et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060021040 | Boulanger et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060031377 | Ng et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060031407 | Dispensa et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060031529 | Keith, Jr. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041641 | Breiter et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041759 | Kaliski, Jr. et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047716 | Keith, Jr. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060047946 | Keith, Jr. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074943 | Nakano et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095705 | Wichelman et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060129459 | Mendelsohn | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143709 | Brooks et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149955 | Velhal et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060179061 | D'Souza et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060224544 | Keith, Jr. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060224545 | Keith, Jr. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060233310 | Adams, Jr. et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070011292 | Fritsch et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070078982 | Aidun et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070094269 | Mikesell et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070143374 | D'Souza et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070174658 | Takamoto et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174690 | Kambara et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070185936 | Derk et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070233633 | Keith, Jr. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255604 | Seelig | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271290 | Keith, Jr. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271428 | Alturi | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070274315 | Keith, Jr. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276836 | Chatterjee et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080016387 | Bensinger | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080034019 | Cisler et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080034071 | Wilkinson et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080072002 | Kuwahara et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077622 | Keith, Jr. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077630 | Keith, Jr. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080127294 | Keith, Jr. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080209142 | Obernuefemann | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080216168 | Larson et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080294860 | Stakutis et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080313632 | Kumar et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090094362 | Huff | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100050011 | Takamoto et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100125770 | Keith, Jr. | May 2010 | A1 |
20110047118 | Keith, Jr. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120198154 | Keith, Jr. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120272099 | Keith, Jr. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130031405 | Keith, Jr. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO2005119493 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO2005119494 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO2005119495 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO2006010131 | Jan 2006 | WO |
WO2006094282 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO2006094301 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO2007139962 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO2007139963 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO2008039386 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO2008039394 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO2008039395 | Apr 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Microsoft Press, Microsoft® Computer Dictionary, Fifth Edition; May 1, 2002; Fifth Ed. |
IEEE100, “The Authoritative Dictionary Of IEEE Standards Terms”, Seventh Edition, Jan. 2003, 3 pages. |
VMWARE, VMware Infrastructure Architecture Overview, Jun. 14, 2006, http:/www.vmware.com/resourse/techresources/, pp. 1-14. |
VMWARE, Using VMware Infrastructure for Backup and Restore, Oct. 26, 2006, http:/www.vmware.com/resourse/techresources/, pp. 1-20. |
IBM Corporation, AFS: “User Guide”, First Edition, Version 3.6. Apr. 2000, pp. 112. |
Shepler et al. “RFC 3530—Network File System (NFS) version 4 Protocol”, Standards Track, Apr. 2003, pp. 278, http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3530#page-119. |
Tridgell, A., “Efficient Algorithms for Sorting and Synchronization,” Thesis, The Australian National University, Feb. 1999, 106 pages. |
MacDonald, J.P., “File System Support for Delta Compression,” University of California at Berkeley, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, May 19, 2000, 32 pages. |
Microsoft@ Computer Dictionary, Fifth Edition, 2002, 3 pages. |
Muthitacharoen et al., “A Low-bandwidth Network File System,” MIT Laboratory for Computer Science and NYU Department of Computer Science, 2001. 14 pages. |
Yu et al., “Scalable network resource management for large scale Virtual Private Networks,” Simulation Modeling Practice and Theory, 12 (2004) pp. 263-285. |
Cisco PIX “Configuring an IPSec Tunnel Between a Cisco Secure PIX Firewall and a Checkpoint NG Firewall,” May 12, 2006, document ID 23785. |
Random House Unabridged Dictionary, “device: meaning and definitions,” 1997, Random House Inc., retrieved via “http://dictionary.infoplease.com/device”. |
Definition of Plug-in (computing) from http:/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plug-in—(computing), printed Jun. 18, 2011, 1 page. |
Plug-in definition from Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plug-in—(computing) printed Nov. 6, 2011, 5 pages. |
Bandwidth Capping at Source http://www.24onlinebilling.com/download/whitepapers/Bandwidth%20Capping%20At%20Source.pdf pp. 1-9, Feb. 7, 2006. |
http://www.macrovision.com/products/flexnet—installshield/installshield/overview/index.shtml, pp. 1-3, Sep. 15, 2006. |
http://macrovision.com/products/flexnet—installshield/installshield/index.shtml, pp. 1-2, Sep. 15, 2006. |
http:/ www.stealthbits.com/, pp. 1-2, Sep. 15, 2006. |
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windows2000serv/maintain/featusability/inmnwp.mspx, pp. 1-36, Sep. 16, 2006. |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wik/Expert—system, pp. 1-9, Sep. 15, 2006. |
http://www.pctools.com/registry-mechanic/, pp. 1-2, Sep. 15, 2006. |
http://www.backup.com, Dec. 15, 2006. |
http://www.swapdrive.com/sdbackup.asp, Dec. 15, 2006. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060031529 A1 | Feb 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60577148 | Jun 2004 | US |