Absorbent articles such as diapers, adult incontinence garments, feminine care products, child training pants, pull-ups, bandages, gloves and similar products that directly contact skin are well known. A disposable absorbent article is typically composed of a top layer that is adjacent to a user's body and a back layer that faces the clothing of the user. An absorbent material is located between the top layer and the bottom layer. The top layer permits a liquid from the user to move through the top layer toward the back layer. The back layer does not allow liquid to be transferred from the inside of the absorbent article onto the user's clothing. The absorbent material absorbs the liquid and keeps the skin dry.
During normal operation after a fluid is discharged from a user, the fluid will flow through the top layer and be absorbed by the absorbent material. The absorbent material is designed to absorb, redistribute, and store the fluid until the absorbent article is discarded. In some instances, however, fluid may return from the absorbent material to once again contact the user's skin. Fluid return can occur, for instance, if the absorbent material cannot sufficiently absorb the fluid due to the composition of the absorbent material. Unabsorbed liquid undesirably results in over-hydration of the contacted skin and in turn, increases a chance of skin irritation to the user. In addition to being an irritant, excessive moisture on the user's skin can cause, among other things, the growth of microorganisms that can lead to the onset of rashes or infection.
Various tests exist for measuring performance and suitability of absorbent materials to prevent the foregoing problems. Known tests include capacitance, capacitive reactance, conductance, electrical impedance, and/or evaporative or Trans-Epidermal Water Loss (TEWL) evaluations. Typically, these tests measure fluid absorbency, fluid leakage, and other criteria of the materials for use in absorbent articles.
By way of example, the Adult Forearm Test or “armband” test is conventionally used to evaluate the effectiveness of disposable diapers to keep the skin dry. In the armband test, changes in skin surface hydration are measured by evaporimetry or TEWL evaluation. To maintain a healthy and moisture-balanced skin, the TEWL readings between un-diapered and diapered skin should not differ significantly. One variation of the armband test uses pre-loaded patches from diapers placed on an adult volar forearm, and differences in skin surface hydration between cloth diapers and disposable paper diapers have been noted.
Another armband test uses an intact diaper wrapped around the forearm. Physiological saline is injected into the diaper at a rate and volume that represent normal urination by a child. Post-occlusion measurements are made after one hour, and measurements of skin hydration are made by computerized evaporimetry or by electrical conductance.
The above and other common tests have been used extensively for evaluating skin hydration of covered or diapered skin. It would be advantageous to have a bench top instrument that produces results similar to the TEWL test to reduce for instance high variability found in conventional tests.
In general, the present invention is directed to a bench top instrument for evaluating materials quickly, efficiently, and cost effectively. In particular, a virtual arm is provided to evaluate the microclimate and hydration of the substrate covered by the test material. The virtual arm produces results similar to the TEWL test and is also used for determining microclimate conditions in the materials. The component parts of the invention are simple, reliable, and economical to manufacture and use.
In one aspect of the invention, a metallic cylinder is provided to simulate an adult forearm for rapidly evaluating a material for further evaluation, possibly on human subjects. The arm incorporates a fluid injection port to simulate a urethra, a sweat gland, a pore, and the like. A simulated skin substrate is placed on a portion of the arm proximate the fluid injection port. The prototype material is wrapped about the simulated skin substrate and the fluid injection port. Saline or other simulated physiological fluid is insulted into the prototype material. After a predetermined time, the prototype material is removed and the skin is evaluated for dryness.
In another aspect of the invention, a mechanical arm incorporates a fluid injection port to simulate a sweat gland, a pore, a urethra and the like. A material is wrapped about the arm and the fluid injection port. Saline or other simulated physiological fluid is insulted into the material. The material is held in place on the arm under a controlled temperature condition to allow determination of a microclimate in the material.
The foregoing aspects of the present invention enable rapid pre-screening of material at relatively low cost without many of the variables found in conventional screening devices and methods. Other aspects and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description and the attached drawings, or can be learned through practice of the invention.
The above and other aspects and advantages of the present invention are apparent from the detailed description below and in combination with the drawings in which:
a is a cross-sectional end-view of a conventional evaluation apparatus;
b is a cross-sectional end-view of the apparatus as in
c is a cross-sectional end-view of another embodiment according to the invention;
Repeat use of reference characters in the drawings and the detailed description is intended to represent same or analogous features or elements of the invention.
As used herein, the terms “simulated,” “artificial,” “synthetic” and like terms are used interchangeably to indicate manufactured materials or objects, and in the case of substrates, dissected or bio-engineered skin samples, unless otherwise indicated.
As used herein, the term “substrate” generally refers to a work-piece designed to simulate human skin. The substrate can be used directly as obtained from a living or dead source; from a bioengineered, cultured, or manufactured product; and/or following a pretreatment to modify a character of the substrate. For example, the substrate can be derived from any biological source such as a living/preserved skin sample from animal models including but not limited to a pig, a monkey, a rat, a human cadaver and similar sources. Examples of bioengineered or cultured sources include but are not limited to a VITRO-SKIN™ or VITRO-CORNEUM® product available from IMS Inc., Milford, Conn.; a TEST SKIN™ II product available from Organogenesis Inc., Canton, Mass.; a SKINETHIC® product available from Skinethic Tissue Culture Laboratories, Nice, France; EpiDerm™ simulated human skin from Matek Corporation, Ashland, Mass.; a medical grade collagen film; a collagen in a sausage casing; a cellulose film; a chamois; a cultured or bioengineered skin substrate; and similar materials.
By way of example, VITRO-SKIN™ contains protein and lipid components and is designed to have topography, pH, critical surface tension and ionic strength that mimic human skin. Its consistent “N-19” topography and wetting properties across each sheet are optimized to mimic relatively smooth skin found on the human back. Thus, testing done on VITRO-SKIN™ is generally more reproducible than that performed on human skin. In comparison, VITRO-CORNEUM® is a collagen-based substrate with properties similar to human stratum corneum i.e., the outer layer of epidermis of primarily dead skin cells. Specifically, VITRO-CORNEUM® is designed to simulate the thickness, visco-elasticity and surface properties of human stratum corneum. Another suitable simulated skin is collagen in a sausage casing. The collagen/casing arrangement is a cost-effective alternative for pre-screening materials and does not have to be handled and stored as a biological sample. An exemplary collagen film is available from NATURIN GmbH, Weinhein, Germany, under the designation of COFF12224 with a basis weight of about 28 g/m2. Another exemplary collagen film is available from Devro, Inc, Geneva, Ill., under the designation of Cutisin™.
As used herein, the term “fluid” generally refers to a liquid, exudate or any substance having fluid-like properties suitable for simulating a physiological fluid. The fluid can be derived from any biological source, such as a physiological fluid, including blood, saliva, ocular lens fluid, cerebral spinal fluid, perspiration, urine, simulated urine, bowel movements (BM), milk, ascites fluid, synovial fluid, peritoneal fluid, amniotic fluid, menses fluid or the like. The fluid can be pretreated prior to use, such as preparing plasma from blood, diluting viscous fluid and the like. Methods of treatment can involve filtration, distillation, concentration, inactivation of interfering components, and the addition of reagents. Moreover, in addition to real or simulated physiological fluids, other liquid samples can be used, such as water, food products, saline, a solution of 0.9% sodium chloride, a colored solution, and the like to examine environmental or food absorption performance of a material.
As used herein, the term “material” generally refers to a natural or artificial product to be insulted with the fluid for evaluating skin hydration of a material-covered skin. The material can be a prototype material, a finished product, a competitor's product and the like. Examples of a material include but are not limited to an absorbent material, disposable or non-disposable diapers, diaper systems, adult incontinence products, feminine products, nursing healthcare products, child training products, bandages, gloves, face masks, disposable or non-disposable gloves, microporous film, stretchable film, latex rubber, cotton gauze, bandage materials, carded webs, vertical filament stretch-bonded laminates (VFL), spunbonded laminates (SBL), carriers with spunbond filaments or fibers (SMS), cellulose, absorbent composites, or any other material or garment used for contact with skin. Additionally, the material can be a non-woven polymer material, an airlaid material, a wet material, a dry material, a treated material, and any disposable or non-disposable material.
As used herein, the term “microclimate” generally refers to an environment found in any area/volume between the material to be tested and the object upon which the material is attached. The area/volume includes but is not limited to any cavity, depression, void, chamber, or other area/volume between the material and the object that forms an internal climate or microclimate between the material and the object. For example, in one aspect herein, the microclimate is formed in a chamber defined within a cylinder. In another aspect, the microclimate is formed simply between a surface of the material and a surface of the object.
Detailed reference will now be made to the drawings in which examples embodying the present invention are shown. The drawings and detailed description provide a full and detailed written description of the invention and the manner and process of making and using it, so as to enable one skilled in the pertinent art to make and use it. The drawings and detailed description also provide the best mode of carrying out the invention. However, the examples set forth herein are provided by way of explanation of the invention and are not meant as limitations of the invention. The present invention thus includes modifications and variations of the following examples as come within the scope of the appended Claims and their equivalents.
In general, the present invention is directed to an evaluation apparatus for determining microclimate conditions in a material. The evaluation apparatus is also used for evaluating the substrate hydration covered by the test material. In particular, the present invention employs a virtual arm as a bench top instrument that produces results similar to the conventional TEWL test by simulating characteristics of a human arm. These characteristics include but are not limited to relative and absolute humidity, temperature, and physical dimensions. In addition to TEWL, humidity and temperature, the virtual arm allows determination of the microclimate conditions in the material based on spectroscopy, video, polymeric thin film sensors such as Electronic Nose, or other invasive or noninvasive monitoring.
Referring to
In this example, the arm 12 is formed of a metal such as aluminum. Metal permits uniform heating of the arm 12 as described below. Although the exemplary arm 12 is made of aluminum, which can be anodized, other metals and materials such as steel, tin, brass, iron, glass, acetyl-plastic, acrylic-plastic, an elastomeric material, a high density polyethylene, or any other resin, epoxy or polymer, composite materials and similar moldable materials may be suitably used.
While the illustrated arm 12 is representative of a female forearm, it is not intended as a limitation of the invention. For example, the arm is about 2 inches to about 80 inches in circumference, often about 10 inches. The circumference of the arm 12 can be adjusted from about 2 inches to about 80 inches electronically, hydraulically, pneumatically, manually, or otherwise in proportion to the material M to be tested. For instance, the arm 12 may be adjusted to about 3 to about 5 inches in circumference to test a premature baby material M, or to about 80 inches in circumference to test a large size adult undergarment. Additionally, the exemplary arm 12 is about 10 inches to about 20 inches in length, more particularly about 12 inches, to accommodate a wide variety of materials M. It is contemplated that the arm 12 can be adjusted in length electronically, hydraulically, pneumatically, manually, or otherwise, for instance by telescoping, to accommodate the variety of materials M.
More particularly, as shown in
Also shown in
It is to be noted that the digital or computer controlled fluid delivery device 34 is provided by way of example only in
In this aspect of the invention, the slots 16 are elongated from about 2 inches to about 5 inches in length, more particularly about 4 inches long, and from about 0.0625 inches to about 3.0 inches wide, more particularly about 0.1875 inches wide. Moreover, the slots 16 are disposed about the surface 12c of the arm 12 substantially parallel to each other, and spaced apart from about 0.05 inches to about 0.5 inches, more particularly about 0.2 inches to create the chamber 18. In this exemplary embodiment, the chamber 18 is from about 0.25 inches to about 4 inches in diameter and from about 2 inches to about 5 inches in length.
The illustrated slots 16 are not limited to elongated, parallel geometries as described in the foregoing aspect of the invention. It is intended that the slots 16 have various sizes and shapes and be disposed on the arm surface 12c in regular or irregular relationship to each other, such as in uniform or non-uniform patterns, periodic or aperiodic patterns. Additionally, the slots 16 may not extend into a center of the arm 12 to form the chamber 18. The slots 16 may be depressions with multiple or uniform depths and have semi-hemispherical, rectangular, curvilinear or other geometric shapes. In one aspect, the slots 16 are about 0.0625 inches to about 3.0 inches wide and from about 2 inches to about 5 inches in length. Therefore, it is to be understood that additional or fewer slots 16, or various shapes and sizes of slots 16, will affect an overall size or existence of the chamber 18.
One purpose of slots 16 is to allow temperature and humidity to be measured within the microclimate created in the chamber 18. The microclimate is formed when the fluid F and/or a gas created from an evaporation of the fluid F enters the chamber 18. The dimensions of the slots 16 are designed to minimize the volume of the chamber 18 in order to minimize the time for the microclimate to stabilize. However, as will be described in an alternative embodiment below, the slots 16 and chamber 18 are provided by way of example only and not as a limitation of the invention. For instance, simply attaching the material M to the arm 12 and forming a space or void area between a surface of the material M and surface 12c of arm 12 is sufficient to create the microclimate.
a shows a standard human armband test with a diaper M wrapped about the arm and external measurements being taken by a TEWL probe T. In this example, the TEWL probe T measures real-time temperature and/or humidity and water loss across two probes within the TEWL probe T.
With reference to
c shows an alternative embodiment of the bench test device, generally indicated by the numeral 110. A virtual arm 112 is provided in this aspect similar to the arm 12 described above. However, the embodiment of
By way of example operation,
The present invention may be better understood with reference to the following Experiments and protocols.
Results derived from an experiment conducted in accordance with one exemplary embodiment of the present invention are as follows.
In the following experiment, a diaper M was tested on the arm 12 as illustrated in
Tables 1-3 , respectively at
In accordance with another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, results derived from a clinical TEWL study conducted on 20 subjects testing for commercially available diaper products are as follows.
The following test involved the recording of baseline readings on the skins of the human subjects for TEWL and on the outside of dry diapers for WVTR. After a saline F was added to the diaper M, Rh and temperature readings were taken inside the diaper M using an HM138 probe at 20, 40, and 60 minutes into the test. A final TEWL measurement was also taken.
In a second test, the arm 12 was used instead of human subjects. With a sample size of 10, a baseline WVTR reading was taken on the outside of a dry diaper M applied to the arm 12. Rh/temperature and WVTR readings were taken at 20, 40, and 60 minutes into the test after saline F was added to the diaper M.
Data from the clinical study was compared to the data in the subsequent arm 12 study to see if TEWL correlated to Rh inside the virtual arm 12. A correlation was found between WVTR on the human subjects and WVTR on the virtual arm 12. Additionally, reduced variability was noted in the data (lower standard deviation) for numerous variables measured.
Based on the strong correlation between the foregoing comparisons between human tests and the virtual arm 12 experiments and the repeatability of the latter, the arm 12 is suitable for a variety of uses and is not limited to the foregoing examples. For instance, the arm 12 can be employed as a bench test for evaluating materials for dryness and other related properties; for establishing procedures for measuring dryness in materials; for evaluating equipment used to measure dryness; for screening competitive products; for performing other research and development and the like.
While preferred embodiments of the invention have been shown and described, those skilled in the art will recognize that other changes and modifications may be made to the foregoing embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, specific shapes of various elements of the illustrated embodiment may be altered to suit particular applications such as shaping the arm 12 as a lower torso mannequin, an upper torso mannequin, a full body mannequin, a mannequin forearm, a mannequin hand, a mannequin foot, a mannequin head and various other portions of a human body. It is intended to claim all such changes and modifications as fall within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1561285 | Sesler | Nov 1925 | A |
2545281 | Hunt | Mar 1951 | A |
2752697 | Lawall | Jul 1956 | A |
3341394 | Kinney | Sep 1967 | A |
3502538 | Peterson | Mar 1970 | A |
3502763 | Hartmann | Mar 1970 | A |
3542615 | Dobo et al. | Nov 1970 | A |
3952584 | Lichstein | Apr 1976 | A |
4041203 | Brock et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4209939 | Pittala | Jul 1980 | A |
4257188 | Barker | Mar 1981 | A |
4340563 | Appel et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4357827 | McConnell | Nov 1982 | A |
4360345 | Hon | Nov 1982 | A |
4720415 | Vander Wielen et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4773865 | Baldwin | Sep 1988 | A |
4932919 | Shapero | Jun 1990 | A |
5066259 | Acker | Nov 1991 | A |
5067924 | Munter | Nov 1991 | A |
5320733 | Bohm | Jun 1994 | A |
5361627 | Levesque | Nov 1994 | A |
5409382 | Donnelly et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5419729 | Gross | May 1995 | A |
5425265 | Jaisinghani | Jun 1995 | A |
5518436 | Lund et al. | May 1996 | A |
5913708 | Gross | Jun 1999 | A |
5941710 | Lampotang et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6015935 | LaVon et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6107537 | Elder et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6152906 | Faulks et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6298714 | Courtray | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6413142 | Weastler | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6446495 | Herrlein et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6464557 | Ohba et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6483324 | Mitter et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6534074 | Krzysik et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6543657 | Fan et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6557398 | Lindmark et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
20020191669 | Fan et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
803714 | Jan 1969 | CA |
2272182 | May 1994 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040121294 A1 | Jun 2004 | US |