This invention relates to Internet Protocol Television (IPTV) technology and, specifically, to a system and method for providing an IPTV service to a user such that the user may view programming content on a device such as a computer, the presentation and functionality associated with traditional programming paradigms being maintained.
In the traditional television paradigm, programming content is sent as an analogue or digital signal to a viewer's television set via cable, satellite or through the air. The signals are then received, processed and displayed for the viewer to watch on the screen of the television set.
However, with the exoteric spread of portable electronic devices, such as laptop computers, viewers no longer wish to be restricted to watching television via a conventional television set which is, more or less, confined to use in one physical location. Given the desire or need for portability, and the ubiquitous presence of Internet-based technologies within modern computing equipment, the ability to receive IPTV services via computing equipment is becoming increasingly important from both a consumer's (i.e. viewer's) perspective and from the perspective of the service providers who seek to commercialize the opportunities.
Thus, the monopoly of the traditional television paradigm is being eroded and challenged by the development of Internet Television (Internet TV) and Internet Protocol Television (IPTV) technologies.
Internet TV enables a user to select programs from a list and is typically delivered over an IP network in the form of streaming video via a website. The content is embedded into a web page, and accompanying text is typically wrapped around the streaming video which is presented to the viewer within a separate window. In some ways, this presentation style is similar to a newspaper page wherein surrounding text flows around, not over the image, albeit that the static image is replaced by a video component.
By contrast, a typical IPTV system enables delivery of a digital television service to a viewer over a closed network infrastructure. The delivery is performed using Internet Protocol and typically includes a broadband connection. The IPTV system receives and displays the video stream, which has been encoded as a series of Internet Protocol (data) packets. IPTV can be in the form of live TV, but also as stored video—sometimes known as ‘video on demand’ (VOD).
Traditionally, the viewer must use a device known as a set-top box (STB) in conjunction with his/her television set in order to receive and view IPTV. The set top box acts as an interface between the television and the network, decoding the incoming video streaming media, converting it into standard television signals and providing two-way communications over the IP network. It also performs functional processing, such as setting up the connection and quality of service (QoS) with the service node, channel change functionality and user display control. This functionality is achieved via the use of software known as ‘middleware’.
‘Middleware’ is a key component within the IPTV solutions architecture. It is the application software layer that acts as an interface between the user interface and the hardware/operating system (OS) of the STB. Middleware vendors adopt abstraction based strategies to isolate themselves from the underlying hardware.
However, service providers can find it challenging to make the IPTV business model commercially viable due to the (often relatively high) cost of STBs. This is compounded by the linear nature of the cost/functionality line of STBs—the more features or functions the STB is required to posses, the higher the cost of the device. This has prompted IPTV service providers to investigate the possibilities of delivering their services to mass market end user devices (such as personal computers) where the cost of the hardware has already been borne by the end user/viewer. Thus, if standard computing components can be used to mirror and mimic their televisual counterparts (e.g. monitor, CPU, disk used to replace TV, STB, VCR respectively) then functionality can be maintained whilst eliminating the cost and inconvenience of a required STB.
In order to receive IPTV services and view them on other devices, such as a personal or laptop computer, there is a need, therefore, for the computer itself to perform the functional processing discussed above in relation to the STBs used with televisions.
Thus, there is a need for a system which provides the seamless delivery of IPTV services to an alternative device such as a computer. Ideally, such a system would be arranged and configured such that it can be integrated with existing IPTV technologies. This integration work is required, primarily, in 3 areas:
Both approaches suffer from the problem that the STB vendor provided APIs (both ECMAScript and C/C++) are not standardized and, therefore, each middleware vendor must perform a ‘porting’ exercise each time a new STB is to be added to their portfolio of supported end user devices.
Another problematic area facing would-be computer-based IPTV systems is that most known IPTV systems are designed to deliver IP encapsulated MPEG-2/4 content at 2 to 4 Mbps to users on multicast enabled networks. To date, the general lack of multicast support within large portions of the available networks restricts the number of potential target clients. There are several commercial and technical factors in existence, which remain barriers to the effective delivery of these services.
End users of television services are typically unconcerned with the underlying delivery mechanism employed to deliver the picture to their device (e.g. DTT, IP etc.). However, they are concerned about the quality of the content which they wish to view and the ease of use with which they access that optimal-quality content.
Therefore, a preferred solution should be capable of presenting a high quality service and consistent navigational paradigm to the viewer, whilst (behind the scenes) detecting, selecting and presenting the best quality programming possible based upon the current position of the viewer's device within the network (regardless of multicast support).
In other words, the solution should incorporate a dynamic video source selection (DVSS) mechanism, such that the user is provided with a single experience, of optimal quality on any network.
Known solutions attempt to address some of these difficulties, although they typically involve considerable expense from the service provider to effectively create a parallel distribution mechanism (encoding, encryption, delivery, middleware integration, device integration etc.), and typically provide a different viewing experience (in terms of presentation style and format, navigational interfaces etc.) from that which the viewer would expect from a traditional television based service.
In addition, many proposed solutions focus on how to deliver IPTV content to an end user, rather than how to process and/or display that content once it has been received at the client end, or how to improve/replace the technology employed at the client end.
For example, EP1895777 A1 discloses a method of providing an IPTV service to a subscriber, and a network element for executing said method. This is achieved by introducing an additional tier (an ‘intertwine’ tier) into the traditional 3 tiered IPTV architecture. This intertwine tier comprises IPTV service routers and a communication network, thus enabling provision of an IPTV service between different networks which may belong to different operators and/or be installed in different countries. Thus, the invention adds roaming functionality to the existing IPTV service.
However, the method and element disclosed in EP1895777 A1 do not enable a subscriber to receive and display ITPV content on an alternative device, such as a computer. Instead, the disclosed invention provides an alternative architecture for delivery of the programming content to the subscriber and does not address the issues discussed above concerning the technology employed at the client end.
Similarly, WO 2008/045384 A2 discloses an IPTV transport architecture with double layer encryption and bulk decryption. The disclosed invention is designed to operate in accordance with a client's traditional television/STB combination, and does not provide a means of presenting the programming content on an alternative device.
A number of systems are known in relation to STB simulation, for the purpose of testing constrained, isolated aspects of IPTV service delivery.
For example, the invention disclosed in EP 1914940 A1 provides a test apparatus for assessing the quality of an IPTV service, and to locate and repair malfunctions. The test apparatus accesses the IPTV network (from a central office) as a simulation of the user's STB, receives and analyses channel information and media contents downloaded from the IPTV network, and then generates test results. This obviates the need for an operator to enter the user's premises and perform the test routine using manual test apparatus. Thus, the STB simulation performed by the disclosed invention is limited such that it only simulates the way in which the STB presents itself to the network and receives information from the network. It does not present a fully operable STB emulation system which could be used to replace a user's STB and television and present the received content to the viewer. Thus, it does not provide a means of performing all the functions required and expected of a physical STB.
Similarly, US 2002/0026637 A1 discloses a computer program which allows a personal computer to emulate the functions of various STBs so that a combined video and an enhanced content stream can be displayed and randomly accessed to ensure that a desired layout is achieved with respect to the displayed content. The program is designed to facilitate quick and easy checking of the quality of the content presentation, with modification to the combined content stream being permitted during the checks if required. Thus, only one aspect of a traditional STB functionality is addressed by the disclosed invention, which does not provide a complete, alternative system for use in presenting IPTV content to an end user. The disclosed invention provides a means of pre-viewing video and interactive content by a producer rather than presenting a complete service to a user.
Neither US 2002/0026637 A1 nor EP 1914940 A1 address the problem of integrating different forms of existing middleware products with a STB emulation system. Neither do they include simulation components to support or emulate other traditionally required functions such as conditional access and other network management functions.
Thus it is an object of the invention to provide a means for receiving IPTV services on a user's device such as (but not exclusively) a personal computer, and presenting the IPTV content on the device, such that the viewer enjoys continuity of programming service regardless of his/her physical location or the underlying hardware/software platform of the device.
Thus, it is an object of the invention to provide a system and method for the simulation of a physical STB, and to enable standard computing components to mirror and mimic their televisual counterparts (e.g. monitor, CPU, disk->TV, STB, VCR).
It is an object of the invention to provide a solution which can be easily integrated with known IPTV technologies.
It is a further object of the invention to maintain substantially the same viewing experience as that experienced by a user when receiving and viewing televisual services via traditional (i.e. television plus physical STB) or alternative technologies. In other words, the content, navigational paradigm, presentation and quality of service must be substantially the same as those enjoyed by users of traditional IPTV systems.
It is a further object of the invention to provide a means of receiving and presenting said IPTV service such that 3rd party category I or category II middleware, designed for execution by a physical STB, can execute in its usual manner and provide the same functionality on the viewer's computer without modification. The maintained functionality will typically include the ability to perform presentation layer rendering, video blending and multi-media control, and the provision of User Interfaces.
Thus, it is an object of the invention to provide a virtual STB application environment which not only emulates the underlying hardware capabilities of a physical STB (e.g. video scaling, video positioning, chroma keying, alpha blending, UI layout, Remote Control key handling etc.) but also provides the same software environment in terms of available APIs and libraries such that 3rd party middleware is able to execute in this environment without modification.
It is a further object of the invention to provide a Conditional Access (CA) mechanism such that a service provider is able to control and manage the user's ability to access the programming content, said mechanism being easy to deliver and manage from a network/provider's perspective.
It is a further object of the invention to provide an IPTV system wherein the system is resource efficient (especially in respect of CPU usage and memory).
It is a further object of the invention to provide an IPTV system for receiving and presenting IPTV services on a user's device such that dynamic video source selection (DVSS) is achieved, wherein the system is able to determine and acquire the optimal quality programming possible based on the current position of the user's device within the network. It is preferred that this source selection is achieved dynamically, without the need for explicit input from the user.
Thus, the present invention provides a means of eliminating or alleviating at least one of the above identified problems, and achieving at least one of the above identified objectives.
In accordance with a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a set-top box emulation system for presenting IPTV content to a user on an electronic device, said emulation system comprising:
In a preferred embodiment of this first aspect, an IPTV system is arranged and configured such that a viewer can receive and watch IPTV televisual content displayed on an electronic device, said device acting as an alternative to a traditional television and STB combination. In a typical embodiment, said device is a personal or laptop computer, although other electronic devices may be used.
It is preferred that the televisual content is delivered from a service provider's head-end in the same way that it would be delivered to a STB being used in conjunction with a television set. When viewing said televisual content in accordance with the present invention, the navigational and presentation styles are maintained, and the format of the content is the same or substantially the same as that experienced by a viewer using a physical STB and television set.
Essentially, the invention provides a means for emulation of a traditional (physical) STB such that a virtual STB environment is created within the viewer's computer. The emulation is achieved by a software-based system which creates a virtual STB environment for other (known) software to interact with, such that the emulation system running on the computer presents itself to the network (and service provider) as if it were a physical STB connected to a television.
Preferably, the present invention has 3rd party middleware embedded within it, said middleware being appropriate to the viewer's chosen service provider. That is to say, the virtual STB component acts as a wrapper around a vendor's middleware. Thus, a STB emulation component is installed on the end user's (i.e. viewer's) device, said emulation component encapsulating 3rd party middleware which is appropriate for and compatible with the delivery system deployed by the user's chosen IPTV service provider.
Thus, in accordance with a first aspect of the invention, there is provided an API-based STB emulation environment within which known 3rd party middleware (both category I and II) is able to execute. The execution and performance of the middleware is preserved in its traditional form, and the 3rd party middleware interacts with the virtual STB environment (i.e. with the invention) as it would with a traditional STB operating within a traditional IPTV system. No modification of the vendor's middleware is required.
Thus, the viewer is able to view televisual content on an electronic device such as a personal or laptop computer, or other electronic device, by providing a virtual STB environment within the device, said virtual environment being able interface and interact with known 3rd party middleware such that all aspects of functionality, performance and presentation formats are substantially identical to those enjoyed by users of a traditional IPTV (i.e. STB plus TV) configuration.
In accordance with a second aspect of the invention, the STB emulation component emulates the underlying hardware capabilities of a physical STB, thus enabling the same functionality (such as video scaling, video positioning, chroma keying, alpha blending, User Interface (UI) layout, Remote Control key handling and so on). These functions are emulated by a plurality of sub-components, each sub-component handling the emulation of a particular STB function. Each sub-component may, in turn, comprise one or more further sub components.
In a preferred embodiment of the first aspect of the invention, the sub-components of the STB emulation component may include (but are not restricted to) a player component, an embedded web browser, a management component, a decryption component and a set of one or more API libraries.
The STB emulation component may be configured, or tailored, to the viewer's (or service provider's) requirements via the use of configuration files, which store settings to enable and facilitate the management and control of the behavior of the STB emulation component.
In addition to the STB emulation environment, there is provided a set of core APIs which act as conduits into the 3rd party middleware executing within the virtual (i.e. emulated STB) environment. These APIs are essential to the performance of the claimed invention.
The APIs service requests made by external applications and expose the functionality of the middleware to those applications. Thus, the STB emulation component operates in conjunction with the set of core APIs to enable the maintenance of connectivity between standard category I and II middleware and the IPTV service provider.
In other words, in order to facilitate management from the network operator perspective, there needs to be direct access into the embedded middleware by the service provider. If the middleware belongs to category I, this is achieved by DOM connectivity. If, however, the middleware belongs to category II then connectivity is achieved via the middleware's APIs which connect to the set of core APIs provided in accordance with the invention.
Thus, the emulated environment provided by the present invention is agnostic to 3rd party middleware connectivity.
In a preferred embodiment of a first aspect of the invention, the APIs provide the following essential capabilities, although other interfaces may be included so as to extend the set of capabilities or, alternatively, some may not be required in alternative embodiments: a Graphics Interface, a MUX interface, a conditional Access (CA) Interface, a Media Interface, a Network Interface, an Event interface, a System Settings Interface and a Persistent Storage Interface.
In accordance with a second aspect of the invention, the middleware selected for use with the arrangement described above is category II (i.e. API-based) middleware. In a preferred embodiment, the user interface is handled by the category II middleware. The APIs provided in accordance with the present invention ‘plug into’ (i.e. provide connectivity with) the APIs provided within the 3rd party category II middleware.
Thus, the category II middleware is able to operate within the emulated environment without any alteration or modification, even though it was designed originally for use with a physical STB (and television set) rather than a computer system.
In accordance with a third aspect of the invention, the arrangement described in relation to the first aspect is configured for use with category I (i.e. browser-based) middleware. In accordance with the third aspect of the invention, and in addition to the features listed in relation to the first aspect, there is provided a proprietary web browser. Preferably, the set of core interfaces described above (graphics interface, events interface etc.) integrate, or connect, with the proprietary browser. In a preferred embodiment, the user interface is handled by the proprietary browser, working in conjunction with the category I middleware.
In accordance with the third aspect of the invention, a set of STB emulation APIs (written in ECMAScript) is inserted into the DOM of the browser. Third party category I middleware is also inserted into the DOM of the browser. The STB emulation APIs emulate and/or replace the APIs which would traditionally be provided by the STB vendor. They take DOM requests and translate them into API requests.
Thus, the category I middleware is able to operate within the emulated environment without any alteration or modification, even though it was designed originally for use with a physical STB rather than a computer system.
For the sake of clarity, it should be noted that a typical embodiment of the emulation system described herein provides at least two sets of distinct APIs:
According to a fourth aspect of the invention, there is provided a Dynamic Video Source Selection (DVSS) component arranged and configured for use with the present invention.
As previously stated, viewers of IPTV programming content are not generally concerned with the underlying delivery mechanism(s) used to provide their viewing content. They do, however, care about the quality of that content, and the ease with which they can access their desired programs.
Thus, there is a need to provide, for the viewer, a consistent navigational paradigm whilst, behind the scenes, determining and acquiring the best quality programming available based upon the current position of the client device within the network. In summary, the aim of the DVSS component is to provide a consistent viewing experience, using any network, whilst maintaining optimal quality of service.
In addition, the provision of a DVSS component removes the need for a closed network, and allows the client device to receive ‘regular’ DVB based broadcast feeds (typically via a USB-based DVB-T dongle) and thus it is not mandatory that the video packets received via the network are encapsulated in IP. This approach is usually referred to as a ‘hybrid’ approach.
The functionality of the DVSS component can be decomposed into a number of key technical areas:
These and other aspects of the present invention will be apparent from and elucidated with reference to, the embodiment described herein.
An embodiment of the present invention will now be described, by way of example only, and with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
With reference to the above listed Figures,
The present invention removes the need for a traditional (i.e. physical) STB or television set, and provides a software-based emulation environment such that the signals can be received, processed and viewed on an alternative device, such as a computer, without loss or adaptation of service, presentation style or functionality.
This maintenance of viewing experience is illustrated in
Thus, the functional components of the invention (best illustrated in
As shown in
When considering WebTV services, operators are usually forced to transrate or transcode their existing content into a more PC ‘friendly’ format such as Windows Media and Flash. This then requires the employment of alternative Conditional Access and Digital rights Management (DRM) strategies, and must finally re-design their whole UI/presentation layer to overcome the non-TV nature of their target device.
This leads, generally, to implementations where text flows around (not over) the video.
According to a first aspect of the invention, a computing device is configured and arranged such that an operating system (OS) is able to execute on said computer, and is connected to a network such that data may be received from external source(s) over the network and/or sent to external source(s) over the network.
In addition, it is preferred that the computing device is arranged and configured to include a plurality of hardware components such as those included in a typical personal/laptop computing system. Such hardware components may include, but not be limited to:
In a preferred embodiment, said interfaces may provide the following essential capabilities, although other interfaces may be included so as to extend the set of capabilities or, alternatively, some may not be required in alternative embodiments:
Turning to
Turning to a preferred embodiment of the fourth aspect of the invention, a DVSS component is provided and is integrated with the emulation sub-components described above. The DVSS component implements the concept of dynamic video source selection, which is most clearly illustrated in
Preferably, the DVSS component further comprises sub-components such as (but not restricted to) a PVR controller, an IGMP client, a RTSP client and a DVB-T client. The DVSS component integrates with a controller which in turn is supported by an AV API contained within the afore-said Javascript API libraries. In a preferred embodiment, the DVSS component may also integrate with the decryption component.
In a typical embodiment, a management component is provided which enables a network operator to manage the system as if it were a router or a physical STB. This further comprises a TR-135 client which allows the management according to standards based TR-069 based management servers.
In a typical embodiment, a decryption component is provided, and forms an interface between said DVSS component and said player component. The role of this component is to receive signals from a dynamically selected source, decrypt said signals and pass them on to the player component for further processing and display.
In a typical embodiment, API libraries, implemented in a language such as Javascript, are provided and may include a display API (to provide connectivity with said player component), an AV API (to provide connectivity with a DVSS controller, which in turn integrates with said DVSS component) and an Event API (which provides support for requests made by the management component).
It should be noted that the above-mentioned embodiments illustrate rather than limit the invention, and that those skilled in the art will be capable of designing many alternative embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. In the claims, any reference signs placed in parentheses shall not be construed as limiting the claims. The word “comprising” and “comprises”, and the like, does not exclude the presence of elements or steps other than those listed in any claim or the specification as a whole. In the present specification, “comprises” means “includes or consists of” and “comprising” means “including or consisting of”. The singular reference of an element does not exclude the plural reference of such elements and vice-versa. The invention may be implemented by means of hardware comprising several distinct elements, and by means of a suitably programmed computer. In a device claim enumerating several means, several of these means may be embodied by one and the same item of hardware. The mere fact that certain measures are recited in mutually different dependent claims does not indicate that a combination of these measures cannot be used to advantage.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/22.412 filed on Mar. 21, 2014 (now U.S. Pat. No. 10,616,646), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/610,608 filed Sep. 11, 2009 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,683,543), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/556,443 filed on Sep. 9, 2009 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,332,905), which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/095,738, filed Sep. 10, 2008, which is hereby incorporated by reference. This application is related to U.S. application Ser. No. 12/556,347, entitled “Dynamic Video Source Selection,”, (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,418,207).
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
666929 | Brooks | Jan 1901 | A |
2843766 | Rosier et al. | Jul 1958 | A |
3398339 | Pierpont et al. | Aug 1968 | A |
4535355 | Arn et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
5953506 | Kalra et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5999979 | Vellanki et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6003045 | Freitas et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6108703 | Thomson et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6195680 | Goldszmidt et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6366614 | Pian et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6421726 | Kenner | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6477117 | Narayanaswami | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6542964 | Scharber | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6574591 | Kleiman et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6604118 | Kleiman et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6922304 | Nakagawa | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6922394 | Kajiwara | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6976090 | Ben-Shaul et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7133368 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7240100 | Wein et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7299291 | Shaw | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7461147 | Mowat | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7523181 | Swildens et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7590703 | Cashman et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7779135 | Hudson et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7861273 | Fries et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8438285 | Brown et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8463677 | Vonog et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8478905 | Brown et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8504449 | Brown et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8516039 | Brown et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8543612 | Matsubara | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8555332 | Brown et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8724639 | Mahmoud | May 2014 | B2 |
8732749 | Hulse et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8745122 | Sayko et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8752206 | Joseph et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8789096 | Bly, Jr. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8817684 | Hao et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8850490 | Thomas et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8964743 | Wang | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8989055 | Delorme et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9003455 | Hulse et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9032452 | Baskaran et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9066123 | Christopher et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9131013 | Jemiolo et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9137302 | Makhijani et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9229734 | Hulse et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9294728 | Mills | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9294803 | Bond et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9392316 | Morris | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9407956 | Lirette et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9456253 | Murphy | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9462332 | Malik et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9479489 | Lee | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9497036 | Kim et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9509798 | Thomas et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9571328 | Salama et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9602775 | Barnett, Jr. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9774657 | Brutch et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9860483 | Williams et al. | Jan 2018 | B1 |
9888270 | Dang et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9929870 | Calzone | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9948984 | Trimper et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10051338 | Medina et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10079872 | Thomas et al. | Sep 2018 | B1 |
10219022 | Gopalakrishnan et al. | Feb 2019 | B1 |
10405054 | Okamura et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10521250 | Joseph et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10740618 | Karlsson | Aug 2020 | B1 |
10893266 | Reisner et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10963539 | Unter Ecker et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
20020026637 | Markel et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020152318 | Menon et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020162112 | Javed | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030014684 | Kashyap | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030151753 | Li et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030154239 | Davis et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040083283 | Sundaram et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040103444 | Weinberg et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20050021862 | Schroeder et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050081218 | Acott et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050108414 | Taylor et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050120107 | Kagan et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050188051 | Sneh | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060036436 | Halcrow et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060080718 | Gray et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060101495 | Yoshida et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060184972 | Rafey et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206246 | Walker | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060206581 | Howarth et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060277316 | Wang et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070121728 | Wang et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070199039 | Diroo et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080022084 | Raftelis et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080046909 | Smetana et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080060035 | Tsang et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080069350 | Reinoso et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080120671 | Sim et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080141317 | Radloff et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080189360 | Kiley | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080195698 | Stefanovic et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080219151 | Ma et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080225698 | Smith et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080244660 | Wodka et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080301744 | Hutchings | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080307484 | Dandekar et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090019480 | White | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090019505 | Gopalakrishnan et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090052540 | Gutman et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090063983 | Amidon et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090077614 | White et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090183213 | Mukerji et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090241143 | White et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090252329 | Casey et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090284652 | Bennett et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090300673 | Bachet et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100017832 | Wang | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100064335 | Jenkin et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100146527 | Craib | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100162410 | Chudy et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100186053 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20120168283 | Pawelski | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120183040 | Fang et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20140114919 | Woods | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140122544 | Tran et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20150146012 | Shipley et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150163540 | Masterson | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150264423 | Torgemane et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20170272783 | Bachmutsky et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170272792 | Bachmutsky et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101098458 | Jan 2008 | CN |
102714616 | Oct 2012 | CN |
104010211 | Aug 2014 | CN |
102724562 | Feb 2015 | CN |
105049921 | Nov 2015 | CN |
105187820 | Aug 2017 | CN |
104346117 | Jan 2019 | CN |
109874025 | Jun 2019 | CN |
108449633 | Oct 2020 | CN |
108769743 | Nov 2020 | CN |
1914940 | Apr 2008 | EP |
2437194 | Apr 2012 | EP |
2624249 | Mar 2017 | EP |
2216959 | Apr 2019 | EP |
2483499 | Mar 2012 | GB |
101557143 | Sep 2015 | KR |
101718889 | Mar 2017 | KR |
I666929 | Jul 2019 | TW |
2006122024 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2007113410 | Oct 2007 | WO |
2007143933 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2008012488 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2008045384 | Apr 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office “Patents Act 1977: Search Report Under Section 17(5),” dated Dec. 24, 2009; Application No. GB822236.6, filed Dec. 5, 2008. |
Edwards, W. Keith et al. “An Extensible Set-Top Box Platform for Home Media Applications” IEEE 2005. |
Harris, Jan, “Inuk Networks announces launch of igloo set-top box” , httQ :/ /www. iQtv-watch .co. u k/20092007 -in u k -networks-an nou nces-lau nch-of -igloo-settoo-box.html (Sep. 20, 2007), 1-5. |
Informitv.com, “Inuk igloo provides cool set-top box for personal computers” , http:/linformitv.com/news/2007/09/12/inukialooprovides/ (Sep. 12, 2007), 1-2. |
ITVT, “INUK Launches PC-Based Virtual Set-Top Box, “Igloo”” , httQ://blog.itvt.com/storw1444/inuk-launches-Qc-based-virtual-set-toQ-box-igloo, (Oct. 15, 2007), 1-4. |
Wesleyclover.com, “INUK Networks Launches World's first PC-based Virtual Set-top Box; Delivering a True Television Experience to the PC” , httQ://wesle˜clover.com/index.QhQ?OQtion=com-content&task=view&id=448&1temid=1 ˜ (Sep. 7, 2007), 1-2. |
Clover, Julian , “Magnet pulls in Igloo PCTV Solution” , http://www.broadbandtvnews.com/?o=8027 (Sep. 10, 2008), 1-3. |
ITVTWP, “Inuk Integrates SecureMedia's CNDRM Technology with igloo” , httQ :/ /blog. itvt. com/2008/1 0/06/m ag net-networks-selects-in u ks-ig loo-vi rtu al-set-toQbox-software/, (Oct. 6, 2008), 1-3. |
USPTO “International Search Report” dated Dec. 12, 2008; International Appln. No. PCT/US2008/061035, filed Apr. 21, 2008. |
Patent Office, International Searching Authority, “International Search Report,” dated Dec. 29, 2009; International Application No. PCT/GB2009/002167, filed Sep. 10, 2009. |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, “Examination Report Under Section 18(3),” dated Mar. 5, 2012; Application No. GB0822236.6. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Office Action, dated Oct. 3, 2013 for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,736,330. |
European Patent Office, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, dated Jan. 14, 2014 for European Patent Application No. 09 785 086.1. |
Peltotalo, Jani et al. “A Massively Scalable Persistent Content Distribution System,” Proceedings of the Sixth IASTED International Conference on Communications, Internet, and Information Technology; Jul. 2-4, 2007, Banff, Alberta, Canada; Acta Press, vol. 575, Jul. 2, 2007, p. 7PP, XP009126743; ISBN: 978-0-88986-673-7, p. 1, left-hand col., line 1-p. 3, right-hand col., line 14. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200236432 A1 | Jul 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61095738 | Sep 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14222412 | Mar 2014 | US |
Child | 16837016 | US | |
Parent | 13610608 | Sep 2012 | US |
Child | 14222412 | US | |
Parent | 12556443 | Sep 2009 | US |
Child | 13610608 | US |