Patent Grant
10660950
This application is a national stage filing under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Patent Application Serial No. PCT/EP2016/082663, filed Dec. 23, 2016, the contents of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The disclosure relates to methods for the purification of viruses for use in vaccines.
Regulatory agencies such as the World Health Organization establish standards and guidelines for the production of pharmaceutical compositions administered to humans, such as vaccines, that limit quantity and components of the compositions. Meeting these standards is particularly challenging with regard to production of vaccines containing biological agents, such as viruses, which must be propagated on cell substrates. Such vaccine preparations must be sterile (i.e., free from independently replicating organisms) and may contain no more than 10 ng of host cell DNA per human dose, among other requirements. These standards are in place in order to ensure safety of the composition for human administration, but may introduce challenges in the development of processes used to produce such compositions.
Protamine was originally isolated from the sperm of salmon and other species of fish but is now produced primarily through recombinant biotechnology. It is a highly cationic peptide that binds to negatively charged molecules such as nucleic acids to form a stable ion pair. Its use in removing host cell nucleic acid is well document.
During the course of routine virus purification, it was observed that addition of protamine sulfate to a virus harvest produced on a cell substrate removed not only contaminating DNA derived from host cells, as expected, but surprisingly also virtually eliminated immature and otherwise non-infectious virus particles from the preparation. This finding provides a streamlined, gentle, reproducible and broadly-applicable process for obtaining highly-purified infectious virus particles for applications such as vaccine preparation; furthermore, the process is not dependent on the charge of the virus particle.
Disclosed herein are downstream processes for purifying virus particles from a crude preparation. The downstream process can be applied to either a virus which has not adapted for propagation on a particular cell substrate or for a partial/fully cell substrate adapted virus particle.
Aspects of the invention provide processes for the purification of infectious virus particles comprising the steps of (a) providing a crude harvest (a) comprising virus particles and impurities, wherein the impurities are generated from growing said virus particles on a cell substrate; (b) reducing impurities from the crude harvest (a) by precipitation with an agent comprising a protamine salt, preferably a protamine sulphate, to obtain a virus preparation (b); and further purifying the virus preparation (b) by method or methods selecting for size of the virus particles, such as e.g. a sucrose density gradient centrifugation to obtain a virus preparation (c) comprising the infectious virus particles.
In some embodiments, the concentration of protamine sulphate in step (b) is about 1 to 10 mg/ml, more preferably about 1 to 5 mg/ml, more preferably about 1 to 2 mg/ml. In one embodiment, the concentration of protamine sulphate in step (b) is about 2 mg/mL. In one embodiment, the concentration of protamine sulphate is 1.2 to 1.8 mg/ml, more preferably 1.4 to 1.6 mg/ml. In a preferred embodiment, the concentration of protamine sulphate in step (b) is about 1.6 mg/ml or about 2 mg/ml.
In some embodiments, the residual host cell DNA of the virus preparation (e) is less than 1 μg/mL, especially less than 900, 800, 700, 600, 500, 400, 300 or 200 ng/mL, preferably less than 100 ng/mL. In a preferred embodiment, the residual host cell DNA of the virus preparation (c) is less than 10 ng/mL. In some embodiments, the residual host cell protein of the final virus preparation (c) is less than 10 μg/mL, especially less than 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3 or 2 μg/mL, preferably less than 1 μg/mL. In a preferred embodiment, the residual host cell protein of the virus preparation (c) is less than 100 ng/mL. In some embodiments, the residual non-infectious virus particles of the final virus preparation (c) is less than 10 g/mL, especially less than 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3 or 2 μg/mL, preferably less than 1 μg/mL. In a preferred embodiment, the residual non-infectious virus particles of the virus preparation (c) is less than 100 ng/mL.
In some embodiments, the residual protamine is less than 1 μg/mL, especially less than 900, 800, 700, 600, 500, 400, 300 or 200 ng/mL, preferably less than 100 ng/mL, more preferably is below the detection limit of HPLC, in particular below the detection limit in the final drug substance. In some embodiments, the PS content is tested by HPLC or size exclusion chromatography (SEC). For example, HPLC is validated for PS determination in JEV sucrose gradient pool samples as a routine release assay and is very sensitive (i.e., LOQ 3 μg/mL; LOD 1 μg/mL). In the current invention, PS content in virus DS samples was <LOD. In one embodiment, the HPLC assessment of PS content can be performed on a Superdex Peptide 10/300GL column (GE: 17-5176-01) using 30% Acetonitrile, 0.1% Trifluoroacetic acid as solvent with a flow rate of 0.6 ml/min at 25° C. and detection at 214 nm. A more sensitive method of measurement for residual protamine in a purified virus preparation is mass spectrometry (MS). In some embodiments, the residual PS levels in a virus preparation are tested by MS or other such highly sensitive method, e.g., nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). With this method, residual PS, as well as fragments and/or break-down products of PS, can be detected at trace amounts, such as levels as low as, for example, 106, 107 or 108 molecules per typical sample load. In some embodiments, the PS levels are tested in the sucrose gradient pool. In some embodiments, the PS levels are tested in the drug product. In some embodiments, the PS levels are tested in the drug substance.
In some embodiments, the crude harvest (a) comprising the virus particles and impurities is subjected to one or more pre-purification step(s) prior to step (b). In some embodiments, the one or more pre-purification step(s) comprises digesting host cell genomic DNA in the crude harvest (a) comprising the virus particles and impurities by enzymatic treatment. In some embodiments, the one or more pre-purification step(s) comprises filtration, ultrafiltration, concentration, buffer exchange and/or diafiltration. In some embodiments, the one or more pre-purification steps is filtration using a filter having a pore size equal to or less than 1 μm. In some embodiments, the filter has a pore size equal to or less than 0.2 μm. In a preferred embodiment, the filter has a pore size of 0.2 μm. In some embodiments, the concentration and/or ultra/diafiltration and/or buffer exchange is performed by tangential flow filtration (TFF). In some embodiments, ultra/diafiltration of the crude harvest (a) comprising the virus particles and impurities is performed using a hollow fiber membrane having a cut-off of equal to or less than 300 kDa. In a preferred embodiment, the hollow fiber membrane has a cut-off of 100 kDa.
In some embodiments, the virus particle is a live virus, a chimeric virus, an attenuated live virus, a modified live virus, or a recombinant live virus. In a further step, the virus particles of the invention may by optionally inactivated. In some embodiments, the virus particle is an attenuated form of the virus particle. For example, the virus may have reduced infectivity, virulence, and/or replication in a host, as compared to a wild-type virus. In some embodiments, the virus is a mutated or modified virus, for example the nucleic acid of the virus may contain at least one mutation relative to the wild-type virus. In some embodiments, the virus is a recombinant live virus, meaning a virus that is generated recombinantly and may contain nucleic acid from different sources.
In some embodiments, the virus particle is a live virus, an attenuated live virus, a modified live virus, or a recombinant live virus. In some embodiments, the virus belongs to a virus family selected from the group consisting of Paramyxoviridae, Orthomyxoviridae, Flaviviridae, Filoviridae, Arenaviridae, Rhabdoviridae, and Coronaviridae. In some embodiments, the virus belongs to a virus family selected from the group consisting of Togaviridae (being live or inactivated), such as alphaviruses, or Flaviviridae (being live or inactivated). In some embodiments, the virus is a virus of the family Flaviviridae, i.e. a flavivirus. In other embodiments, the virus is a Zika virus or Yellow Fever virus. In preferred embodiments, the virus is a Zika virus. In a most preferred embodiment, the Zika virus is a Zika virus from the Asian lineage.
In some embodiments, the relative reduction of impurity of the final virus preparation relative to the liquid medium (a) comprising the virus particles and impurities is in a range from 60 to 95%. In some embodiments, the residual impurity of the final virus preparation is less than 1%. We observed a decrease in the HCP peaks and the non-infectious aggregate peaks in the HPLC-SEC or SDS-PAGE. An exact quantification is difficult but one can measure the density of the SDS-PAGE bands and other methods.
In some embodiments, the filtration of step in (b)(ii) of claim 1 is performed using a filter having a pore size equal to or greater than 1 μm. In some embodiments, the filter has a pore size equal to or greater than 0.2 μm. In a preferred embodiment, the filter has a pore size of 0.2 μm.
In some embodiments, the virus is propagated in a cell line selected from the group consisting of an EB66 cell line, a Vero cell line, a Vero-αHis cell line, a HeLa cell line, a HeLa-S3 cell line, a 293 cell line, a PC12 cell line, a CHO cell line, a 3T3 cell line, a PerC6 cell line, a MDSK cell line, a chicken embryonic fibroblast cell line, a duck cell line, and a diploid avian cell line. In some embodiments, said cell line is a duck cell line. In some embodiments, said cell line is a diploid avian cell line. In some embodiments, said cell line is EB66 cell line. In a preferred embodiment, said cell line is a Vero cell line.
Aspects of the invention provide a use of any of the processes described herein for manufacturing a composition for immunization against a viral infection. In a preferred embodiment, the composition is a vaccine. In one embodiment, the composition or vaccine is directed against Chikungunya virus. In one embodiment, the composition or vaccine is directed against a flavivirus. In one embodiment, the composition or vaccine is directed against Yellow Fever virus. In one embodiment, the composition or vaccine is directed against Zika virus such as e.g. a Zika virus of the Asian lineage.
Other aspects provide compositions comprising the virus particles obtainable by any of the processes described herein for treating and/or preventing a viral infection. In one embodiment, the viral infection is caused by Chikungunya virus. In one embodiment, the viral infection is caused by a flavivirus. In one embodiment, the viral infection is caused by Yellow Fever virus. In one embodiment, the viral infection is caused by Zika virus such as e.g. a Zika virus of the Asian lineage.
In some embodiments, the attenuated form of ChikV is derived from the LR2006-OPY1 ChikV infectious clone (La Reunion isolate). In some embodiments, the attenuated form of ChikV is the Δ5nsP3 mutant as described by Hallengird et al. (Novel Attenuated Chikungunya Vaccine Candidates Elicit Protective Immunity in C57BL/6 mice (2014) Journal of Virology 88(5):2858-2866) or an immunogenic variant thereof. The immunogenic variant of the Δ5nsP3 ChikV mutant is herein defined as having at least 80% sequence identity to the nucleotide sequence of the Δ5nsP3 mutant sequence as provided by SEQ ID NO: 77, especially at least 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88% 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98% or at least 99% sequence identity to SEQ ID NO: 77.
In some embodiments, the Zika virus is derived from the Asian lineage. In some embodiments, the Zika virus is a Zika virus as described partially or fully in Sequence section of this application, i.e. any of sequences SEQ ID Nos 2 to 69 or 78, in particular all partly or fully described Zika viruses of the Asian lineages or an immunogenic variant thereof. The immunogenic variants of the Zika virus or Zika virus of the Asian lineages are herein defined as having at least 80% sequence identity to the nucleotide sequence of the sequences described in any of sequences SEQ ID Nos 2 to 69 or 78, especially at least 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88% 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98% or at least 99% sequence identity.
In some embodiments, the process of the invention results in an enrichment of infectious virus particles from the crude harvest comprising infectious virus particles and non-infectious virus particles and other virus products such that the enrichment of the infectious virus particles is at least 50%, at least 60%, at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 90%, at least 95%, preferably at least 80%, especially 85% relative to the total virus particle content of the crude harvest (a) comprising the virus particles and impurities.
In some embodiments, the residual impurity of the final virus preparation with respect to all impurities in the crude harvest is less than 10%, 9%, 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 4%, 3%, 2%, 1%, preferably less than 5% as determined by SEC-HPLC (Size Exclusion Chromatography—HPLC).
In some embodiments, the filtration step of the virus preparation (b) after contact with the solid-phase matrix is performed using a filter having a pore size equal to or greater than 1 Lm. In some embodiments, the filter has a pore size equal to or greater than 0.2 Lm. In a preferred embodiment, the filter has a pore size of about 0.2 μm, such as 0.22 μm.
In some embodiments, the Zika virus, or Chikungunya virus is propagated in a cell line selected from the group consisting of an EB66 cell line, a Vero cell line, a Vero-αHis cell line, a HeLa cell line, a HeLa-S3 cell line, a 293 cell line, a PC12 cell line, a CHO cell line, a 3T3 cell line, a PerC6 cell line, a MDSK cell line, a chicken embryonic fibroblast cell line, a duck cell line, and a diploid avian cell line. In some embodiments, said cell line is a duck cell line. In some embodiments, said cell line is a diploid avian cell line. In some embodiments, said cell line is EB66 cell line. In a preferred embodiment, said cell line is a Vero cell line.
Aspects of the invention provide a use of any of the processes described herein for manufacturing a composition for immunization against a Zika virus, Yellow Fever, or Chikungunya virus infection. In a preferred embodiment, the composition is a vaccine. In preferred embodiments, the vaccine is administered to the subject once, twice or three or more times. In a preferred embodiment, the vaccine is administered once or twice. In a preferred embodiment, the vaccine is administered only once.
The herein disclosed in vivo data regarding immunogenicity of the inactivated Zika virus vaccine of the current invention indicates that the virus is surprisingly potently immunogenic and also highly cross-protective (very similar immunogenicity in African and Asian strains). Data indicate that immunogenicity was unexpectedly higher than the recently reported inactivated Zika virus vaccine candidate (Larocca, et. al, 2016, Nature doi:10.1038/nature18952.). Inactivated viruses are among the safest vaccines and especially preferred for delivery to populations where safety is especially concerning, such as pregnant women, children and immunocompromised individuals, which makes the herein disclosed inactivated Zika virus particularly suitable. Obtaining a high titer of inactivated virus is a challenge in the field. The herein disclosed process for purifying inactivated Zika virus results in not only a high yield, but also a very pure drug substance.
Other aspects provide compositions comprising the virus particles obtainable by any of the processes described herein for treating and/or preventing a Chikungunya virus infection.
The accompanying drawings are not intended to be drawn to scale. The figures are illustrative only and are not required for enablement of the disclosure. For purposes of clarity, not every component may be labeled in every drawing, alignments were performed with the multi alignment package Jalview (Waterhouse et al., 2009, Bioinformatics 25 (9) 1189-1191). In the drawings:
Disclosed herein are processes for the purification of infectious virus particles, i.e., mature, functional virus particles, e.g. flavivirus particles (Yellow Fever, Zika Virus, Japanese Encephalitis virus, Dengue virus) and/or alphavirus particles (Chikungunya virus). The processes disclosed are characterized by the removal of undesired by-products of virus production on host cells, such as non-infectious virus particles and aggregated and immature virus by-products. The processes provided herein allow the production of highly-purified virus preparations comprising mostly infectious virus particles. During the course of the invention, it was observed that protamine sulphate (PS), added to remove contaminating DNA during virus purification, resulted not only in removal of contaminating DNA, but also in the loss of a high percentage of total virus particles present in the preparation. Surprisingly, however, quantification of total infectious virus particles by TCID50 before and after PS treatment revealed that the absolute number of infectious virus particles did not change following this loss of total virus particles. This observation clearly shows that treatment with PS can facilitate selective removal of non-infectious, aggregated and immature viral by-products, leaving behind the infectious Chikungunya virus particles or other infectious virus particles. Because by-products produced during virus growth on host cells may have different (and undesirable) immunological properties or other unwanted side-effects or safety issues, a simple and robust way to remove these by-products is of high importance for the quality and safety of the final product.
Protamines are small arginine-rich nuclear proteins, present in high amounts in the sperm of fish, which have an important role in DNA packaging during spermatogenesis. Protamine sulfate (or “protamine” or “PS”) can form a stable ion pair with heparin and is thus commonly used during certain surgeries when the anti-coagulation effect of heparin is no longer needed. In large doses, protamine sulfate administered alone can also have a weak anticoagulant effect (“Protamine sulfate”. Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. 30 Sep. 2015 Web. 26 Nov. 2015<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protamine_sulfate>). Protamine Sulphate is additionally routinely used in biotechnology applications such as DNA precipitation (e.g., removal of host cell DNA from cell culture processes), purification of DNA binding proteins and retroviral-mediated gene transfer.
Protamine is obtained from salmon sperm or produced recombinantly and is used as a sulphate salt. The four major peptides, which constitute almost the entire nitrogen-containing material in salmon protamine, have been fully characterized and found to be polypeptides of 30-32 amino acids in length, of which 21-22 residues are arginine. The average molecular mass is in the range of 4250 Da for the following sequence: PRRRRSSSRP VRRRRRPRVS RRRRRRGGRR RR (SEQ ID NO: 1). Herein, protamine is also referred to as protamine salt, or preferably protamine sulphate.
The present invention relates to the use of protamine sulphate (PS) in a process of purification of a live virus, wherein the protamine sulphate facilitates the removal of impurities from a crude virus harvest, including non-infectious virus particles and aggregates. As seen in
The use of protamine sulphate can follow crude cell lysis or any further step after cell lysis (e.g. including after a pre-purification with filtration, chromatography etc) wherein the virus particles are further enriched or concentrated and/or other impurities are removed and/or buffer components are exchanged. The further steps may comprise filtration or concentration of the crude cell lysate.
The protamine sulphate may comprise the sequence PRRRRSSSRP VRRRRRPRVS RRRRRRGGRR RR (SEQ ID NO: 1) or a variant thereof wherein the amino acid sequence comprises from 28-35 amino acids, preferably 29-34, more preferably 30-33 amino acids, most preferably 31 or 32 amino acids. The protamine sulphate preferably comprises at least 19 arginine residues, more preferably at least 20 arginine residues, more preferably at least 21 arginine residues, even more preferably at least 22 residues, most preferably 20 or 21 arginine residues. Further, other protamine sulphate-like compounds or variants thereof may be used. Therefore, the use of the term “protamine salt” herein shall serve to encompass natural variations on SEQ ID NO: 1, preferably, but not limited to, the protamine sulphate forms.
The process according to the current invention may also comprise the use of a sucrose gradient, preferably an optimized sucrose gradient. The sucrose gradient is preferably optimized for the removal of protamine sulfate, also for the removal of immature viral particles or other viral particles which are non-infectious or host cell proteins or nucleic acids (DNA, RNA, mRNA, etc) or other host cell debris. In the current invention the optimized sucrose gradient comprises at least two, at least three, at least four layers of sucrose solutions with different densities. In one embodiment, the virus preparation to be purified is provided in a sucrose solution which has a density of about 8%, about 9%, about 10%, about 11%, about 12% sucrose (w/w), preferably about 10%. In one embodiment, one sucrose solution in the gradient has a density of about 45%, about 46%, about 47%, about 48%, about 49%, about 50%, about 51%, about 52%, about 53%, about 54%, about 55% sucrose (w/w), preferably about 50%. In one embodiment, one sucrose solution in the gradient has a density of about 30%, about 31%, about 32%, about 33%, about 34%, about 35%, about 36%, about 37%, about 38%, about 39%, about 40% sucrose (w/w), preferably about 35%. In one embodiment, one sucrose solution in the gradient has a density of about 10%, about 11%, about 12%, about 13%, about 14%, about 15%, about 16%, about 17%, about 18%, about 19%, about 20% sucrose (w/w), preferably about 15% sucrose. In a preferred embodiment, the sucrose gradient comprises three layers of sucrose solutions of about 50%, about 35% and about 15% (w/w) sucrose and the virus composition to be purified is contained in about 10% (w/w) sucrose. Because the invention provided for means to not only test for host cell DNA but also immature viral particles, the skilled person in the art is able to more precisely optimize the sucrose gradient for most efficient purification and include additional tools such as PRNT assay to monitor purification success.
The process comprising the use of protamine sulphate of the invention can be applied to purification of any virus for use in pharmaceutical compositions, for example, for a pharmaceutical composition such as a vaccine where it is important that the virus is in its infectious form. The virus to be purified may be any live virus, any live attenuated virus or any live chimeric virus, preferably a live wild type virus such as a Zika virus of the Asian lineage. In one embodiment, the virus particle is also be later inactivated. In a preferred embodiment, the virus is inactivated with formaldehyde.
In a preferred embodiment, the produced Zika virus is derived from the Asian lineage (which includes the strains found in South America and all strains derived from any Asian lineage). In some other embodiments, the produced Zika virus is a Zika virus as described in the Sequence section of this application (SEQ ID NO: 2 to 69 or 78).
In another preferred embodiment, the live attenuated Chikungunya virus is the protective ChikV-ICRES1-Δ5nsP3 described by Hallengärd et al. (Novel Attenuated Chikungunya Vaccine Candidates Elicit Protective Immunity in C57BL/6 mice (2014) J. Virology, 88(5):2858-2866). Briefly, the ChikV genome carries a positive-sense single-stranded RNA genome of 11 Kb containing two open reading frames encoding nonstructural proteins (nsP1 to nsP4) and structural proteins (C, E3, E2, 6K, and E1), respectively (see
A preferred embodiment of the process of the current invention is shown in
Brix:
Degrees Brix (° Bx) is the sugar content of an aqueous solution. One degree Brix is 1 gram of sucrose in 100 grams of solution and represents the strength of the solution as percentage by mass. ° Bx corresponds to the sucrose content in % (w/w), eg. 45° Bx equals 45% (w/w) sucrose.
Provided below are examples of nucleic acid sequences of the genomes of Zika viruses that may be used in the methods, compositions, and/or vaccines described herein.
In some embodiments, the Zika virus has a RNA genome corresponding to the DNA sequence provided by the nucleic acid sequence of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 2-13 or 73. In some embodiments, the Zika virus has a variant genome that is at least 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%. 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, 99.5%, 99.6%, 99.7%, 99.8% or 99.9% identical to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 2-13 or 78.
Provided below are amino acid sequences of the E-proteins of Zika strains that may be used in the methods, compositions, and/or vaccines described herein.
Provided below are examples of nucleic acid sequences of the genomes of Chikungunya, Japanese Encephalitis and yellow fever viruses that may be used in the methods, compositions, and/or vaccines described herein.
In some embodiments, the Zika virus has a polyprotein, including an envelope (E) protein, with an amino acid sequence provided by any one of SEQ ID NO: 14-69 or 78. In some embodiments, the polyprotein or E protein sequence is at least 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%. 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, 99.5%, 99.6%, 99.7%, 99.8% or 99.9% identical to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 2-69 or 78.
The terms “identical” or percent “identity” in the context of two or more nucleic acids or amino acid sequences refer to two or more sequences or subsequences that are the same. Two sequences are “substantially identical” if two sequences have a specified percentage of amino acid residues or nucleotides that are the same (e.g., at least 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99% identity) over a specified region or over the entire sequence, when compared and aligned for maximum correspondence over a comparison window, or designated region as measured using one of the following sequence comparison algorithms or by manual alignment and visual inspection. Optionally, the identity exists over a region that is at least about 50 nucleotides (or 10 amino acids) in length, or more preferably over a region that is 100 to 500 or 1000 or more nucleotides (or 20, 50, 200 or more amino acids) in length. In some embodiments, the identity exists over the length of a protein, such as the E protein.
For sequence comparison, typically one sequence acts as a reference sequence, to which test sequences are compared. Methods of alignment of sequences for comparison are well known in the art. See, e.g., by the local homology algorithm of Smith and Waterman (1970) Adv. Appl. Math. 2:482c, by the homology alignment algorithm of Needleman and Wunsch, J. Mol. Biol. 48:443, 1970, by the search for similarity method of Pearson and Lipman. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:2444, 1988, by computerized implementations of these algorithms (GAP, BESTFIT, FASTA, Jalview and TFASTA in the Wisconsin Genetics Software Package, Genetics Computer Group. 575 Science Dr., Madison. Wis.), by multi sequence alignment implementation using e.g. CLUSTALW (Larkin et al., (2007). Bioinformatics, 23, 2947-2948.) or MAFFT (Katoh & Toh 2008 Briefings in Bioinformatics 9:286-298), or by manual alignment and visual inspection (see. e.g., Brent et al., Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Ringbou ed., 2003)). Two examples of algorithms that are suitable for determining percent sequence identity and sequence similarity are the BLAST and BLAST 2.0 algorithms, which are described in Altschul et al., Nuc. Acids Res. 25:3389-3402, 1977 and Altschul et al., J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-410, 1990, respectively.
A downstream process was developed for the purification of infectious Chikungunya virus particles whereby non-infectious virus particles and aggregates are removed by the addition of protamine sulphate. The unexpected and novel purification properties of protamine sulphate (PS) were evaluated in purification processes for Chikungunya Virus (ChikV) as follows:
A downstream purification process for the attenuated Chikungunya virus mutant “Δ5nsP3” (as described by Hallengird et al., 2014, supra and provided by SEQ ID NO: 77) produced under standard cell culture conditions in Vero cells was developed. The attenuated Δ5nsP3 Chikungunya virus was derived from the strain LR2006-OPY1, the complete genome of which is provided herein as SEQ ID NO: 72. Briefly, the downstream process consists of crude harvest filtration followed by concentration and diafiltration on a tangential flow filtration (TFF) system. Host cell DNA and host cell proteins were reduced by precipitation with protamine sulphate and by batch adsorption, respectively. Sucrose density gradient centrifugation was done as a final polishing step. Out of 16 roller bottles 1×1012 total PFU were purified with an overall DSP process yield of 10-15% (˜1 log 10 TCID50 loss). Sucrose gradient pool samples were characterized with regard to product-related impurities, such as hcDNA, HCP and endotoxins and met safety criteria.
Harvest of Vero Cell Culture Medium Containing ChikV Δ5nsP3
ChikV Δ5nsP3 was grown on Vero cells in roller bottles. A first harvest was performed after 24 hours post infection (hpi; day 1 harvest) and stored at 2-8° C. until further processing. After the first harvest, fresh medium was added and the roller bottles were returned to the incubator. A second harvest was done after 48 hours post infection (day 2 harvest) and stored at 2-8° C.
Filtration of Crude Cell Culture Harvest
At both harvest timepoints, the crude harvest was immediately filtered using a 0.2 μm filter capsule (GE ULTA™ CG, 2 inch). The filtered harvest after 48 hpi was pooled together with the 24 hpi harvest and the pooled filtered harvest material was immediately further processed by ultrafiltration.
Purification of ChikV Δ5nsP3 by Tangential Flow Filtration (TFF)
The pooled filtered harvest material was further processed by tangential flow filtration (TFF) in order to concentrate the harvest, reduce host cell proteins and replace the depleted cell culture medium with a defined buffer system (buffer exchange). A Millipore TFF system (Millipore Pellicon II mini membrane holder) equipped with a 100 kDa cutoff PES membrane module (Pellicon2 Biomax, 1000 cm2) was used for concentration and buffer exchange. A Pellicon2 Biomax membrane module was mounted on the Pellicon II mini filter holder and the device was connected to a peristaltic pump. The system was first rinsed with ultra-pure water and then sanitized by recirculation of 0.1 M NaOH for 60 min. In case the system was not used immediately, it was stored in 0.1 M NaOH until use. Prior to use the system was rinsed with 1 L of RO-water followed by buffer A until the permeate pH value was constant at pH 7.4±0.2.
Adjustment of the ChikV Δ5nsP3 Harvest (pH, Salt)
The pooled filtered harvest material was adjusted to a final concentration of 25 mM Tris and 150 mM NaCl using stock solutions of both components (see Table 1). This adjustment was done to increase buffering capacity and to reduce unspecific adsorption to the membrane. The necessary volumes of stock solutions D (1 M Tris, pH 7.4) and E (4.5 M NaCl) were calculated as follows:
Volume of stock solution D (1 M Tris, pH 7.4) added to pooled harvest=Volume of pooled filtered harvest/40
Volume of stock solution E (4.5 M NaCl) added to pooled harvest=Volume of pooled filtered harvest/30
The calculated volumes of stock solution D and Buffer E were added to the pooled filtered harvest under gentle stirring. The adjusted harvest was then stirred using a magnetic stirrer for 5 minutes at room temperature.
Concentration and Diafiltration of the ChikV Δ5nsP3 Harvest by TFF
In a first step, the adjusted harvest material was concentrated approximately 10 fold. The feed flowrate was approximately 220 mL/min. The transmembrane flux at a transmembrane pressure of approximately 0.6 bar was in the range of 90±5 mL/min per 1000 cm2 membrane. After concentration, the cell culture medium was exchanged against 25 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5, by continuous diafiltration with 6 volume exchanges. The diafiltration buffer was supplied to the feed vessel from a measuring cylinder by a second peristaltic pump set to a flowrate of approximately 90 mL/min. Minor flowrate adjustments of the second peristaltic pump in the range of +10 mL/min were done manually to ensure a constant volume of harvest in the feed vessel. After 6 volume exchanges, diafiltration was stopped. The liquid remaining in the membrane module was recovered by pumping the module empty with air.
Sucrose Addition to Diafiltrated ChikV Δ5nsP3 Material
After diafiltration, sucrose stock solution H (50% (w/w) sucrose solution) was added to the diafiltrated material to achieve a final sucrose concentration of 10% (w/w). The volume of buffer H was calculated as follows:
Volume of stock solution H added (mL)=Volume (mL) of diafiltrated ChikV material×0.25
The calculated volume of solution H was added to the diafiltrated ChikV Δ5nsP3 material under gentle stirring and the solution was then stirred using a magnetic stirrer for a further 5 minutes at room temperature. (At this stage of the process the material can be either immediately further processed or stored frozen (<−65° C., hold step).)
DNA Reduction by Protamine Sulphate Precipitation
A DNA precipitation step using protamine sulphate (PS) was performed to reduce hcDNA. Protamine sulphate stock solution L (50 mg/mL PS in PBS) was added to the diafiltrated ChikV Δ5nsP3 material to a final nominal concentration of ˜1.6 mg/mL. The necessary volume of stock solution L was calculated as follows:
Volume of stock solution L (50 mg/mL PS) added=Volume of diafiltrated ChikV Δ5nsP3 material in 10% sucrose/31
The protamine sulphate stock solution was added while stirring the ChikV Δ5nsP3 material using a magnetic stirrer followed by incubation at 2-8° C. for 30 minutes. After incubation, the precipitate was not removed. The material was immediately further processed by batch adsorption with Capto™ Core 700 chromatography media.
Batch Adsorption with Capto™ Core 700
To reduce HCPs, a batch adsorption step with Capto™ Core 700 (CC700) chromatography medium was performed after DNA precipitation. CC700 slurry (50% slurry in buffer A) was added directly to the protamine sulphate treated material. The required slurry volume was determined based on the volume of Δ5nsP3 ChikV harvest material (d1+d2) and was calculated as follows:
Volume of CC700 slurry added to PS-treated concentrated harvest (mL)=Volume of Δ5nsP3
Sucrose density gradient centrifugation (SGC) was used for final concentration and polishing of the Δ5nsP3 ChikV material. The Δ5nsP3 ChikV material was loaded on top of a solution consisting of three layers of sucrose with different densities. The three sucrose layers were selected based on a preliminary study which showed the formation of a linear sucrose gradient and good separation of the virus particles from residual contaminants. The optimal volumes of the sucrose solutions were determined empirically. The volumes of individual layers for a centrifugation at 500 mL scale are shown in Table 3.
Preparation of the Sucrose Gradient
The sucrose gradient bottles (500 mL) were prepared by underlaying the individual sucrose layers. A 3.5 mm ID plastic tube was attached to 60 cm of peristaltic pump tubing. The plastic tube was mounted on a laboratory stand using a clamp and placed into the centrifuge bottle. The nozzle of the plastic tube was placed at the bottom of the bottle. Using a peristaltic pump set to a flow rate of 25 mL per minute, the Δ5nsP3 ChikV material and the sucrose solutions were pumped into the cylinder. A measuring cylinder was used as a feed vessel. The first solution pumped was the Δ5nsP3 ChikV material as it had the lowest density (10% sucrose (w/w)). Following the addition of the Δ5nsP3 ChikV material, the sucrose solutions were pumped in ascending order starting with the lowest (15%), followed by the 35% sucrose solution and finishing with the highest density sucrose solution (50%). After all sucrose solutions were transferred, the plastic tubing was carefully removed in order not to disturb the layers. An illustration of a completed gradient is shown in
Centrifugation
Prior to centrifugation a Beckman Avanti JXN-26 centrifuge equipped with rotor Beckman 10.500 was pre-cooled to 4° C. The prepared SG bottles were carefully transferred into the pre-cooled (4° C.) rotor so as to not to disturb the sucrose layers. The bottles were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm (˜18,500 rcf) at 4° C. for 17-20 hours. (In case a different centrifuge system with a different rotor would be used, the necessary speed and centrifugation times would need to be calculated based on the k-factor in order to achieve comparable centrifugation efficiency.)
Sucrose Gradient Harvest Harvesting of the sucrose gradient following centrifugation was done manually using a peristaltic pump.
A 3.5 mm ID plastic tube attached to 60 cm of peristaltic pump tubing was used for harvesting the sucrose gradient. The 500 mL bottle containing the centrifuged gradient was mounted onto a laboratory stand in a tilted position (˜12°) using a clamp. The plastic tubing was then placed into the bottle touching the bottom edge of the bottle and was fastened in position using a clamp. This resulted in a small gap of 1-2 mm between the tubing inlet and the bottom of the bottle (see
Analysis of fractions by UV absorbance and SEC-HPLC
UV absorbance measurement was used as primary method for analysis of the sucrose gradient fractions. Absorbance at 214, 280 and 260 nm was tested immediately after fractionation was completed. Briefly, a 100 μL sample of each fraction was transferred into a 96 well plate and absorbance at 214, 260 and 280 nm was measured using a plate reader. The absorbance values were plotted against the fraction number. A representative profile is shown in
After identification of the virus containing fractions, the respective fractions were pooled. Pooling criteria for SGC fractions were based on UV 260 nm data, e.g. start of pooling at ˜10% of peak maximum, end of pooling at ˜30% of peak maximum. (Final pooling criteria at a manufacturing scale may need to be determined empirically.) The sucrose gradient pool was either stored at <−65° C. or immediately further formulated to drug substance (DS).
Size Exclusion Chromatography
The final pooled SGC fractions containing purified infectious Δ5nsP3 ChikV particles were analyzed for purity by SEC-HPLC. In brief, SEC was performed as follows: a Superose 6 10/300 Increase column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with PBS+250 mM NaCl, pH 7.4 at 1 ml/min and 25° C., was used to detect ChikV particles at 214 nm detection wavelength in the pooled samples. SEC-HPLC is a semi-quantitative (relative yield) and qualitative (purity) method that separates intact virus particles from virus aggregates and host cell proteins (HCPs). The method cannot distinguish between infectious and non-infectious virus particles due to their identical retention time.
As shown in
SDS-PAGE and Silver Stain
SDS-PAGE silver stain was performed in order to qualitatively assess sample purity throughout the purification process from the first crude harvest through SGC. Briefly, ChikV process samples analyzed by SDS-PAGE/silver stain were diluted 1:1.33 with LDS buffer and were heated to 70° C. for 5 minutes. The samples were loaded onto 4-12% Bis-Tris Gels (NuPAGE). Silver staining was done using the Silver Express staining kit (Invitrogen).
A silver-stained gel of a representative ChikV Δ5nsP3 purification is shown in
Enrichment of Infectious Δ5nsP3 ChikV particles by PS Treatment
Although generally used as a method of removing contaminating hcDNA, it was observed in the course of the present invention that PS treatment also removes virus aggregates and HCPs. Size exclusion chromatography (SEC-HPLC, as described above) was used throughout the purification process to determine the purity of the ChikV virus relative to impurities which also generate UV absorption.
As can be seen in
TCID50 was performed to quantify infectious virus particles during the course of the purification process and to assign an active virus titer to final drug substance and drug product samples. Briefly, Vero cells were seeded at 2×104 cells per well in 100 μL medium (EMEM with 2 mM L-Glutamine+5% FBS+1% antibiotic/antimycotic) in 96-well TC-treated flat-bottom plates and incubated overnight at 35° C./5% CO2. On day two, Vero cell monolayers were infected by adding 100 μL of 1:10 serial dilutions of test samples to each of quintuplicate wells seeded with Vero cells and incubated at 35° C./5% CO2. On day seven, plaques were counted by visualization under a microscope. The TCID50 was calculated according to the Reed & Münch endpoint calculation method (Reed, L. J.; Muench, H. (1938) A simple method of estimating fifty percent endpoints, The American Journal of Hygiene 27: 493-497).
Furthermore, electron microscopy of Δ5nsP3 ChikV samples before and after PS treatment showed that not only large aggregates but also smaller non-infectious virus-like particles (essentially not fully assembled particles lacking the RNA genome) were effectively removed by PS (
This enrichment of infectious virus particles was also observed when analyzing day one and day two crude harvests separately. As presented in Table 4, the SEC area (total virus particles) of the day 1 harvest remains roughly the same after PS treatment; whereas a large decrease in virus peak area is seen for the day 2 harvest after PS treatment. This observation was confirmed by MALLS analysis of the virus preparation, wherein it was seen that a higher percentage of virus particles were of the correct size following PS treatment. Similarly to the results shown in
The PS-treated samples were further purified by sucrose gradient centrifugation (see
Finally, an overview of the relative amounts of Δ5nsP3 ChikV particles and other components as measured by SEC-HPLC at various steps throughout the entire virus purification process from crude harvest (a) to the final SGC purified pool is presented in
Drug Substance (DS) Formulation
The pooled SGC fractions are diluted with DS formulation buffer M (10 mM Tris, 5% Sucrose (w/w), 1% (10 mg/mL) rHSA, pH 7.4±0.2). The final target volume of DS should be in the range of approximately 2 L. Based on current data the estimated range of the dilution factor might be 1:20 to 1:50.
Final DS Sterile Filtration
The final DS was filtered under aseptic conditions in a laminar flow hood using a sterility grade 0.2 μm syringe filter (e.g. 0.2 μm Mini Kleenpak EKV filter capsule with 220 cm2 filter surface, Pall).
Quantification of Host Cell DNA (hcDNA) Host Cell Protein (HCP) and Endotoxin
The residual host cell DNA content of the sucrose gradient pool samples was determined by using the qPCR based assay. The DNA content in SGC pool was determined to be <0.002 ng/mL. The presence of residual host cell protein (HCP) from Vero cells was determined by ELISA. Residual host cell proteins present in the sucrose gradient pool samples were quantified using the Vero Cell HCP ELISA kit (Cygnus, F500). The residual host cell protein content in SGC pool was determined to be <200 ng/mL.
Endotoxin content of the SGC pool and DS was measured by Endosafe®-PTS™ system (Charles River). The system uses Limulus Amembocyte Lysate (LAL) reagents by a kinetic chromogenic methodology to measure color intensity directly related to the endotoxin content in a sample. Each cartridge contains precise amounts of a licensed LAL reagent, chromogenic substrate and an endotoxin control standard. Samples were diluted 1:100 in WFI. The SGC Pool F7-F11 was determined to be <5.00 EU/mL; likewise, the Drug Substance was also determined to have <5.00 EU/mL.
The following specifications for impurities in final Drug product were proposed: hcDNA <10 ng/dose; Endotoxins <50 EU/dose; HCP <200 ng/dose. These residual specifications would already be met in the highly concentrated SGC pool (˜10 log TCID50/mL), which provides a high margin of safety considering the high dilution factor of SGC pool to final DP of >1:1000.
Materials and Methods:
For the production of ZikaV the JEV process platform (Srivastava et al., Vaccine 19 (2001) 4557-4565; U.S. Pat. No. 6,309,650B1) was used as a basis. Small changes of certain process steps were adapted to ZikaV properties and to improve purity. A short summary of the process steps is outlined below (see also
Upstream:
Zika Virus Strain H/PF/2013 was originally isolated from a 51-year-old woman (accession number KJ776791.1, also SEQ ID NO: 13 herein) from French Polynesia. A sample was obtained from the European Virus Archive (EVAg; Ref-SKU: 001v-EVA1545). Based on this material, a research master seed bank (rMSB) was prepared on Vero cells as the cell substrate and the genomic sequence was checked by sequencing. Because the genomic sequence at the 5′ and 3′ flanking sequences of Zika virus strain H/PF/2013 was unknown, primers for sequencing were designed in those regions based on other Zika virus strains whereas the internal primers were designed from the published sequence (SEQ ID NOs: 80 to 123, see also Table A). The sequence obtained from the rMSB by use of these primers is provided by SEQ ID NO: 78. There was 100% overlap of the sequence with the published sequence of Zika Virus Strain H/PF/2013 (SEQ ID NO: 13). However, we sequenced additional regions 5′ (an additional 40 bp) and 3 (an additional 160 bp) represented in SEQ ID NO: 78. In a preferred embodiment, the Zika virus of the invention comprises SEQ ID NO: 78. The genomic RNA is somewhat longer than the sequence according to SEQ ID NO: 78 (perhaps an additional 200 bp). Additionally, a Zika virus adapted to a host cell such as e.g. Vero cells may be expected to contain one or more mutations. For these reasons, the Zika virus of the current invention comprises the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 78 or, preferably, a sequence with at least 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or at least 99% sequence identity to the sequence provided by SEQ ID NO: 78. Furthermore, because the viral genome is likely to contain even further flanking regions to SEQ ID NO: 78; in one embodiment, the Zika virus of the invention contains the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 78 and optionally further comprises extensions at the 5′ and/or 3′ ends of at least 10, at least 20, at least 30, at least 40, at least 50, at least 60, at least 70, at least 80, at least 90, at least 100, at least 110, at least 120 or at least 130 nucleotides. In a preferred embodiment, the Zika virus comprises at least the coding sequence for the entire polyprotein of Zika Virus Strain H/PF/2013 of the invention i.e. the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 79 or a polyprotein with at least 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or at least 99% sequence identity to the sequence provided by SEQ ID NO: 79. Furthermore, the Zika virus comprises at least the coding sequence for the E-protein of Zika Virus Strain H/PF/2013 of the invention SEQ ID NO: 47 or an E-protein thereof with at least 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or at least 99% sequence identity to the sequence provided by SEQ ID NO: 47.
Virus Growth on Vero Cells
Vero cells were grown in Eagle's minimal essential medium (EMEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Roller bottle cultures of Vero cell monolayers were infected with Zika Virus Strain H/PF/2013 at a multiplicity of infection (moi) of 0.01 plaque forming units (pfu) per cell. After 2 hours of virus adsorption, the cultures were washed 3 times with PBS and fed with EMEM without FBS and incubated at +35° C. with 5% CO2. Infected Vero cell cultures were incubated until the virus titer reaches a desired level.
The culture medium was harvested at days 2, 3, 5 and 7 and were pooled from those harvest days and then centrifuged in a standard centrifuge. The supernatants were then filtered. Virus culture supernatants were concentrated by TFF ultrafiltration to remove cell culture media components and to reduce batch volume.
Evaluation of Harvest Procedure
The current JEV harvest process has scheduled harvests on days 3, 5, 7 and 9 post infection. To mimic the JEV process roller bottles were infected with ZIKV bank P4-FBS at an MOI of 0.01 in infection medium (MEM with 2% FBS+2 mM L-glutamine) for 2 hours. After removing the inoculum the cells were washed twice with PBS and 200 mL production medium (MEM+2 mM L-glutamine) was added.
After taking a sample on day 2 the first virus harvest was conducted on day 3 after infection. At this point significantly higher CPE could be observed compared to cells where virus was removed on day 2. Plaque assay analysis showed that the viral titers on day 2 were in the same range as for the standard harvesting schedule. However, starting with the day 3 harvest, the observed titers were significantly lower correlating with the increased CPE observed compared to the standard harvest schedule. On day 5 post infection no more living cells could be observed at all and the experiment was terminated with a final day 5 harvest.
This finding led to an optimized harvest schedule to better control of CPE and allow additional harvest day 5 and 7, see
Downstream Purification of Zika virus
The purification process was carried out at room temperature (18-22° C.) unless stated otherwise. Virus purification started with concentration of filtered combined harvest using 100 kDa cut-off TFF ultrafiltration modules to remove cell culture media components and reduce batch volume. After concentration, the pooled filtered harvest material was adjusted to a final concentration of 25 mM Tris pH 7.5 and 10% sucrose (w/w) using stock solution of both components (see
Host cell DNA and protein reduction as well reduction of non-infectious virus aggregates in the concentrated material was achieved by precipitation with protamine sulphate (2 mg/mL) followed by sucrose density centrifugation (2-8° C.) as final polishing step (see
Effect of PS Treatment on Virus Recovery
Samples of individual 30× concentrated harvests days 2, 3, 5 and 7 were analysed before (
Sucrose Gradient Centrifugation
The PS treated harvest was split in two parts and loaded on two centrifuge bottles.
Sucrose density gradient centrifugation (SGC) was used for final concentration and polishing of the ZikaV material. The ZikaV PS treated concentrated harvest was loaded on top of a solution consisting of three layers of sucrose with different densities. The three sucrose layers were selected based on a preliminary study which showed the formation of a linear sucrose gradient and complete separation of the virus particles from residual contaminants as demonstrated for ChikV (
The sucrose gradient bottles were prepared by stratifying the individual sucrose layers. A plastic tube was attached to peristaltic pump tubing. The plastic tube was mounted on a laboratory stand using a clamp and placed into the centrifuge bottle. The nozzle of the plastic tube was touching the bottom of the bottle. Using a peristaltic pump the ZikaV material and the sucrose solutions were pumped into the cylinder. A measuring cylinder was used as feed vessel. The first solution pumped was the ZikaV material as it represented the solution of lowest density (10% sucrose (w/w)). After the ZikaV material the sucrose solutions were pumped in ascending order starting with the 15% (w/w) solution J, followed by 35% sucrose solution I and finishing with the highest density sucrose solution H (50% (w/w)). The described setup is shown in
Prior to centrifugation the centrifuge was pre-cooled to 4° C. The prepared SG bottles were carefully transferred into the pre-cooled rotor. (Note: Sudden movement of the bottles during transfer to the rotor must be avoided in order not to disturb the sucrose layers.) The bottles were centrifuged at ˜11.000 RCF max at 4° C. for at least 20 hours, no brake/deceleration activated. In case a different centrifuge system with a different rotor is used the necessary speed and centrifugation times need to be calculated based on the k-factor in order to achieve comparable centrifugation efficiency.
Harvesting of the sucrose gradient was done manually using a peristaltic pump. A plastic tube attached to peristaltic pump tubing was used for harvesting the sucrose gradient. The bottle containing the gradient was mounted onto a laboratory stand in a tilted position (˜12°) using a clamp. The plastic tubing was then placed into the bottle touching the bottom edge of the bottle and was fastened in position using a clamp.
This resulted in a small gap of 1-2 mm between the tubing inlet and the bottom of the bottle (see
Using a peristaltic pump set to a flow rate of 30 mL per minute the gradient was harvested and manually split into 2 mL fractions. A total number of 32 fractions per bottle were harvested (˜64 mL) and the remaining volume was discarded. The fractions were immediately tested by SDS-PAGE/silver stain to identify the virus containing fractions with sufficient high purity. Representative SDS-PAGE is shown in
The purified viral solution was inactivated by incubation with 0.02% formaldehyde over a period of ten days in a 22° C. controlled-temperature incubator. The formaldehyde is neutralized by addition of sodium metabisulphite on the tenth day.
The sucrose gradient pool (˜17 mL after sampling) was further diluted 3-fold with PBS to a final volume of 51 mL in a PETG container. A volume of 1% formaldehyde (10,000 ppm) solution equivalent to 1/50 of the final volume of the pre-formaldehyde pool was added to this pool resulting in an effective concentration of 200 ppm. The formaldehyde-treated solution was mixed on a magnetic stirrer for 10 minutes. After sampling, the formaldehyde-treated viral solution was placed within a cooled incubator at 22° C.±2° C. On Day 5 post addition of formaldehyde, the formaldehyde-treated viral solution was filtered through a 0.2 m filter and then placed in the incubator at 22° C.±2° C. again. On Day 10, after removing the 10-Day inactivation final sample, a volume of 1% (of the weight of the final formaldehyde-treated viral solution) of 200 mM-sodium metabisulphite solution (2 mM final concentration) was aseptically transferred into the PETG container containing the formaldehyde-treated viral solution. After mixing for 5 minutes on a magnetic stirrer, the neutralized inactivated viral solution is held at room temperature (20 to 25° C.) for a minimum of 30 minutes. After sampling, the neutralized inactivated viral solution is stored at 5° C.±3° C. until further processing.
Inactivation by Formaldehyde
Critical parameters for this step are final formalin concentration, temperature, mixing and transfer into a new container. A preliminary acceptance criterion for maximum pfu/mL (determined by plaque assay) has been set on the diluted pool pre formaldehyde treatment.
The quality of the neutralized inactivated viral solution was monitored by the following parameters: Plaque assay on Day 10, SEC-HPLC, SDS-PAGE/Western Blot.
Interestingly, SEC-HPLC analysis of samples taken during the inactivation period followed by neutralization with bisulfite showed more or less constant peak area throughout the inactivation period. This is in contrast to JEV where losses of viral particles up to 60% are observed using the process disclosed by Srivastava et al. Vaccine 19 (2001) 4557-4565. In a scale-down model the viral losses were even much higher due to surface/area ratio at smaller scale and high losses due to unspecific adsorption. Differences of the ZikaV inactivation experiment and JEV inactivation were noticed as follows:
For preparation of ZikaV drug substance used in mouse potency assay an antigen content (expressed as total viral particles or SEC peak area) of 5 times higher compared to Ixiaro was targeted. The basis for determination of antigen content was SEC-HPLC. Briefly, a Superose 6 10/300 Increase column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with PBS+250 mM NaCl, pH 7.4 at 1 ml/min and 25° C., was used to detect ZikaV at 214 nm detection wavelength in harvest samples and throughout the downstream process. In the current JEV process the antigen content in NIV is determined by a specific ELISA. A good correlation was observed between antigen content determined by ELISA and SEC-HPLC. On average, the antigen content in commercial NIV samples is in the range of 33 AU/mL corresponding to ˜5.2 mAU JEV peak area, see
ZikaV NIV day 10 (Zika peak ˜36 mAU, analysed on Waters HPLC/Superose6 Increase column) was diluted with PBS to a target of 6.3 (˜5.7× dilution). Aluminium hydroxide was added to a final concentration of 0.5 mg/mL Aluminium (1/20 v/v Alum 2% stock solution added) to prepare ZikaV Drug Product (DP). The DP was gently mixed for 5 min. An aliquot of the DP was removed, Alum sedimented by centrifugation and the clear supernatant analysed by SEC-HPLC. No ZikaV peak was detected in the supernatant indicating complete adsorption (estimated as >95%) of viral particles on the mineral adjuvant. Formulated ZikaV DP was stored at 2-8° C.
The impurity profile of the inactivated Zika virus DS is comparable to the profile of JEV DS with the exception of a lower PS content (Table 8).
SEC-MALLS Results
A representative SEC-HPLC elution profile of ZikaV NIV at 214 nm detection wave length is shown in
SEC-MALLS analysis (
Results confirm purity and homogeneity of ZikaV NIV.
Viral Titer by Plaque Assay
Comparison of PS and Benzonase on Process Performance
A direct comparison of DNA removal method of concentrated ZikaV harvest pool was done. One aliquot was treated with PS (2 mg/mL, 15 min at room temperature), the other aliquot was treated with Benzonase (50 U/mL, 2 mM MgCl2, 4 h RT, 48 h 2-8° C.). Both samples were further purified by sucrose gradient as described in this report. Interestingly, the Benzonase treated samples did not yield any pure fractions after sucrose gradient centrifugation of the treated ZikaV harvest. In those fractions where the specific virus bands were detected, a high amount of host cell protein was detected throughout the collected fractions. The PS treated material resulted in pure ZikaV containing fractions as expected. This finding may suggest that PS is not only effective for DNA removal by precipitation; in addition it improves the recovery of virus particles in the gradient by disrupting interaction of DNA (fragments) and virus particles. Benzonase treatment does not remove DNA, it only results in its fragmentation. Residual DNA fragments might still interact with virus particles and residual HCPs resulting in cross-contamination and co-purification in the sucrose gradient. Pooled SGP fractions were also analysed by SEC-HPLC. Although a large peak was detected, SDS-PAGE confirmed that this sample was highly contaminated with HCPs. A large peak might be detected at UV214 and 280 nm after SEC-HPLC analysis due to possible interaction of HCPs with large virus particles, changing the UV absorbance.
Immunogenicity of Vero Grown Zika Virus
Immunization of Mice
Prior to immunization, groups of ten 6-week-old female CD1 mice were bled via vena facialis and pre-immune sera were prepared. One intraperitoneal immunizations of 200 μL were administered. A dose titration (12 μg, 3 μg, 1 μg, 0.33 μg, 0.11 μg, 0.037 μg and 0.012 μg, equivalent to the protein amount in IXIARO) of inactivated Zika virus formulated with aluminium hydroxide (Al(OH)3) at a final concentration of 0.7%. Three weeks after immunization, blood was collected and immune sera were prepared. All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with Austrian law (BGB1 Nr. 501/1989) and approved by “Magistratsabteilung 58”.
Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test (PRNT)
Twelve well plates were used for PRNT. Each well was seeded with 1 mL medium containing 4×105 Vero cells and incubated 35° C. with 5% CO2 overnight. Pools of heat inactivated sera from each dose group were tested in triplicate. The target viruses (H/PF/2013 (SEQ ID NO: 13) or MR766 (SEQ ID NO: 11)) were diluted to 100 pfu/165 μL. Equal volumes of target virus and serum dilution were incubated at 35° C. with 5% CO2 for 1 hour. The cell culture medium was aspirated from the Vero cells and 330 μL of the mixture target virus/serum dilution were added to each well and the plates were rocked back and forth 5 times before incubating for 2 hours at 35° C. with 5% CO2. To each well 1 mL of a 2% methylcellulose solution containing EMEM and nutrients was added, the plates were then incubated for 5 days at 35° C. with 5% CO2 before staining the cells for 1 hour with crystal violet/5% formaldehyde and subsequently washed 3 times with deionized water. The plates were air dried and the numbers of plaques in each well were manually counted.
Results
Neutralization was observed with serum pools from mice immunized with inactivated Zika virus vaccine (H/PF/2013) down to 37 ng (dosing equivalent to the amount protein in IXIARO®) against Zika viruses of both the Asian (H/PF/2013) and African (MR766) lineages (
Another neutralization assay was performed using the microneutralization assay as described by Larocca, et al. (2016, Nature doi:10.1038/nature18952). It was found that the inactivated Zika virus of the current invention had an MN50 (microneutralization) titer of 90 at 1 μg of inactivated purified virus.
Further methods: The immunogenicity of inactivated Zika virus preparations is assessed using a mouse model of Zika infection. Groups of adult mice are immunized subcutaneously (s.c.) with 500, 50, or 5 ng of inactivated Zika virus with adjuvant (e.g. aluminium hydroxide with or without IC31®), or without adjuvant. An additional group of mice receive PBS as a negative control. Each group is administered the indicated inoculum at t=0 and in some cases also at three to four weeks later (t=3/4). Beginning approximately three weeks after administration of the last immunization, serum samples are obtained from each of the mice at regular intervals. The serum samples are tested for the presence of neutralizing antibodies using PRNT.
The in vivo protective efficacy of the inactivated Zika virus preparations is also assessed using a mouse model of Zika infection, i.e. IFN-alpha/beta receptor knock-out mice (A129) (see e.g. Dowall et al., 4. Mar. 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/042358) or blocking of the IFN-alpha/beta receptor by administration of anti-IFN-alpha/beta receptor monoclonal antibodies to C57BL/6 or BALB/c mice (see e.g. Pinto et al., 7. Dec. 2011, DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002407). For protection assays, groups of 10 three- to eight-weeks-old A129, C57BL/6 of BALB/c mice are inoculated subcutaneously in the hindquarters with inactivated Zika virus with adjuvant (aluminium hydroxide) or without adjuvant at t=0. Age-matched controls are inoculated with PBS or non-specific antigens in alum. Mice are optionally boosted with a second administration of the indicated inoculation three to four weeks later. The mice are then challenged subcutaneously at three to eight weeks post immunization by inoculation with a deadly dose of live Zika virus. One day prior to challenge of C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice, they are passively administered (intraperitoneally) anti-IFN-alpha/beta receptor monoclonal antibodies. Challenged mice are monitored daily for morbidity and mortality for up to twenty-one days. Another alternative is to challenge intracranially adult vaccinated/non-vaccinated adult mice and observe protection.
It is expected that the Zika virus produced by the process of the invention will provide very similar functional read-outs in in vitro, in vivo and finally human trials as the currently licensed JEV vaccine in the EU and US and elsewhere, IXIARO®. The dosage may alter but due to the very similar impurity profile and almost identical manufacture, a very similar efficacy and safety result will be expected as was determined for the currently licensed JEV vaccine (licensed in the EU and US and elsewhere).
The existing manufacturing platform for production of inactivated JEV vaccine IXIARO® was used as a basis for a manufacturing feasibility study of inactivated ZikaV vaccine candidate (Asian strain H/PF/2013). The virus was produced on Vero cells cultivated in roller bottles. The virus was purified by PS treatment followed by an optimized sucrose gradient. Inactivation was done by formalin treat (0.02%, 10 days at 22° C.). For exploratory immunization studies in mice, a DP formulated with Alum was prepared with an estimated 5-fold higher virus particle content compared to IXIARO®, the commercial JEV Vaccine. The impurity profile of the DS met all criteria as defined in the specification for IXIARO®, the commercial JEV vaccine. The neutralization of both the Asian (H/PF/2013) and African (MR766) lineages of the Zika virus was equivalent, which indicates high cross-neutralization between different Zika virus strains of the inactivated Zika virus vaccine (H/PF/2013).
The in vivo data regarding immunogenicity of the inactivated Zika virus vaccine of the current invention indicates that the virus is surprisingly potently immunogenic and also highly cross-protective (very similar immunogenicity in African and Asian strains). Data indicate that immunogenicity was higher than the recently reported inactivated Zika virus vaccine candidate (Larocca, et. al, 2016, supra.). Inactivated viruses are among the safest vaccines and especially preferred for deliver to populations where safety is especially concerning, such as pregnant women, children and immunocompromised individuals, which makes the herein disclosed inactivated Zika virus particularly suitable. Obtaining a high titer of inactivated virus is a challenge in the field. The herein disclosed process for purifying inactivated Zika virus results in not only a high yield, but also a very pure drug substance.
A downstream process was developed for the purification of infectious yellow fever virus particles whereby host cell nucleic acids, non-infectious virus particles and aggregates are removed by the addition of protamine sulphate as described in Examples 1 and 2. The unexpected and novel purification properties of protamine sulphate (PS) were evaluated in purification processes for yellow fever (YF) as follows:
As before the treatment of YF-harvest with PS significantly reduces the amount of aggregates as seen with SEC for two vaccine strains currently in development (
Further more detailed aspects of the invention:
A1. A process of purification of infectious alphavirus particles, preferably Chikungunya virus particles, comprising the steps of:
A2. The process of A1, wherein the residual host cell DNA of the virus preparation (d) is less than 10 ng/mL and the residual host cell protein of the final virus preparation (d) is less than 100 ng/mL.
A3. The process of A1 or A2, wherein the crude harvest (a) comprising virus particles and impurities is subjected to one or more pre-purification step(s) prior to step (b).
A4. The process of any one of A1 to A3, wherein the one or more pre-purification step(s) comprises
A5. The process of any one of A1 to A4, wherein the concentration of protamine sulphate is 1 to 2 mg/ml, more preferably 1.2 to 1.8 mg/ml, more preferably 1.4 to 1.6 mg/ml, most preferably 1.6 mg/ml.
A6. The process of any one of A1 to A5, wherein the molecule entering the core of the solid-phase matrix has a molecular weight less than 700 kDa.
A7. The process of any one of A1 to A6, wherein the ligand of the ligand-activated core of the solid-phase matrix is capable of binding the molecule that enters the ligand-activated core via cationic-, anionic-, hydrophobic- or mixed interactions.
A8. The process of any one of A1 to A7, wherein the ligand of the ligand-activated core of the solid-phase matrix is octylamine.
A9. The process of any one of A1 to A8, wherein the solid-phase matrix is used as a slurry and at a final concentration between 0.5% (v/v) and 10% (v/v), preferably 0.6%, 0.7%, 0.9%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, 10%, most preferably 1%.
A10. The process of any one of A1 to A9, wherein the solid-phase matrix is incubated with the protamine-treated virus preparation (b) at refrigerated temperatures (2° C. to 8° C.) with a stirring for at least 10 minutes, preferably 15 minutes, 30 minutes or 1 hour, most preferably 15 minutes.
A11. The process of any one of A1 to A10, wherein the enrichment of infectious virus particles in the final virus preparation relative to total virus products in the crude harvest (a) is in the range from at least 50% to 95%, preferably at least 80%.
A12. The process of any one A1 to A11, wherein the filtration of step (c) of preferred aspect 1 is performed using a filter having a pore size equal to or less than 1 μm, preferably 0.2 μm.
A13. The process of any one of A1 to A12, wherein the residual impurity of the final virus preparation is less than 10%.
A14. The process of any one of A1 to A13, wherein the virus is propagated in a cell line selected from the group consisting of an EB66 cell line, a Vero cell line, a Vero-αHis cell line, a HeLa cell line, a HeLa-S3 cell line, a 293 cell line, a PC12 cell line, a CHO cell line, a 3T3 cell line, a PerC6 cell line, a MDSK cell line, a chicken embryonic fibroblast cell line, a duck cell line, and a diploid avian cell line.
A15. The process of A14, wherein said cell line is a Vero cell line.
A16. The process of any one of A1 to A15, wherein the Chikungunya virus is a live virus, an attenuated live virus, a chimeric virus, a modified live virus, or a recombinant live virus.
A17. The process of any one of A1 to A16, wherein the Chikungunya virus is the Δ5nsP3 attenuated mutant or an immunogenic variant thereof.
A18. The process of any one of A1 to A17, wherein said process resulting in final virus preparation (d) is followed by an inactivation step, wherein the virus is inactivated preferably by formaldehyde.
A19. Use of the process according to any one of A1 to A18 for manufacturing a composition for immunization against a Chikungunya virus infection.
A20. The use according to A19, wherein the composition for immunization against a Chikungunya virus infection is a vaccine.
A21. A composition comprising the virus particles obtainable by the process of any one of A1 to A18 for treating and/or preventing a Chikungunya virus infection.
N1. A process of purification of infectious alphavirus particles, preferably Chikungunya virus particles, comprising the steps of:
N2. The process of N1, wherein the residual host cell DNA of the virus preparation (d) is less than 10 ng/mL and the residual host cell protein of the final virus preparation (d) is less than 100 ng/mL.
N3. The process of N1 or 2, wherein the crude harvest (a) comprising virus particles and impurities is subjected to one or more pre-purification step(s) prior to step (b).
N4. The process of any one of N1 to 3, wherein the one or more pre-purification step(s) comprises
(a) filtration using a filter having a pore size equal to or less than 0.2 μm; and/or
(b) digestion of host cell genomic DNA by enzymatic treatment; and/or
(c) ultra/diafiltration using a hollow fiber membrane having a pore size equal to or greater than 300 kDa, preferably equal to or greater than 100 kDa.
N5. The process of any one of N1 to 4, wherein the concentration of protamine sulphate is 1 to 2 mg/ml, more preferably 1.2 to 1.8 mg/ml, more preferably 1.4 to 1.6 mg/ml, most preferably 1.6 mg/ml.
N6. The process of any one of N1 to 5, wherein the molecule entering the core of the solid-phase matrix has a molecular weight less than 700 kDa.
N7. The process of any one of N1 to 6, wherein the ligand of the ligand-activated core of the solid-phase matrix is capable of binding the molecule that enters the ligand-activated core via cationic-, anionic-, hydrophobic- or mixed interactions.
N8. The process of any one of N1 to 7, wherein the ligand of the ligand-activated core of the solid-phase matrix is octylamine.
N9. The process of any one of N1 to 8, wherein the solid-phase matrix is used as a slurry and at a final concentration between 0.5% (v/v) and 10% (v/v), preferably 0.6%, 0.7%, 0.9%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, 10%, most preferably 1%.
N10. The process of any one of N1 to 9, wherein the solid-phase matrix is incubated with the protamine-treated virus preparation (b) at refrigerated temperatures (2° C. to 8° C.) with a stirring for at least 10 minutes, preferably 15 minutes, 30 minutes or 1 hour, most preferably 15 minutes.
N11. The process of any one of N1 to 10, wherein the enrichment of infectious virus particles in the final virus preparation relative to total virus products in the crude harvest (a) is in the range from at least 50% to 95%, preferably at least 80%.
N12. The process of any one of N1 to 11, wherein the filtration of step (c) of N1 is performed using a filter having a pore size equal to or less than 1 μm, preferably 0.2 μm.
N13. The process of any one of N1 to 12, wherein the residual impurity of the final virus preparation is less than 10%.
N14. The process of any one of N1 to 13, wherein the virus is propagated in a cell line selected from the group consisting of an EB66 cell line, a Vero cell line, a Vero-αHis cell line, a HeLa cell line, a HeLa-S3 cell line, a 293 cell line, a PC12 cell line, a CHO cell line, a 3T3 cell line, a PerC6 cell line, a MDSK cell line, a chicken embryonic fibroblast cell line, a duck cell line, and a diploid avian cell line.
N15. The process of N14, wherein said cell line is a Vero cell line.
N16. The process of any one of N1 to 15, wherein the Chikungunya virus is a live virus, an attenuated live virus, a chimeric virus, a modified live virus, or a recombinant live virus.
N17. The process of any one of N1 to 16, wherein the Chikungunya virus is the Δ5nsP3 attenuated mutant or an immunogenic variant thereof.
N18. The process of any one of N1 to 17, wherein said process resulting in final virus preparation (d) is followed by an inactivation step, wherein the virus is inactivated preferably by formaldehyde.
N19. Use of the process according to any one of N1 to 18 for manufacturing a composition for immunization against a Chikungunya virus infection.
N20. The use according to N19, wherein the composition for immunization against a Chikungunya virus infection is a vaccine.
N21. A composition comprising the virus particles obtainable by the process of any one of N1 to 18 for treating and/or preventing a Chikungunya virus infection.
P1. A Zika virus vaccine comprising an optimally inactivated Zika virus particle, wherein the Zika virus particle is able to seroconvert a subject that is administered the Zika virus vaccine with at least a 70% probability.
P2. The Zika virus vaccine of P1, wherein the Zika virus particle is able to seroconvert the subject that is administered the Zika virus vaccine with at least a 80%, 85%, 90%, or 95% probability, preferably a 80% probability.
P3. The vaccine of P1 or 2, wherein the Zika virus particle has a RNA genome corresponding to the DNA sequence provided by any one of the nucleic acid sequences of SEQ ID NOs: 2-13, or a variant nucleic acid sequence that is at least 88% identical to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 2-13 and able to pack a virulent Zika virus.
P4. The vaccine of any one of P1-3, wherein the Zika virus particle has an E protein selected from the amino acid sequences provided by any one of SEQ ID NOs: 14-69, or a variant amino acid sequence that is at least 95% identical to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 14-69 and able to pack a virulent Zika virus.
P5. The vaccine of any one of P1-4, wherein the Zika virus is inactivated by chemical inactivation, thermal inactivation, pH inactivation, or UV inactivation.
P6. The vaccine of P5, wherein the chemical inactivation comprises contacting the Zika virus with a chemical inactivation agent for longer than is required to completely inactivate the Zika virus as measured by plaque assay.
P7. The vaccine of P6, wherein the chemical inactivation comprises contacting the Zika virus with formaldehyde.
P8. The vaccine of P7, wherein the formaldehyde inactivation comprises contacting the Zika virus with formaldehyde for between 2-10 days.
P9. The vaccine of any one of P5-8, wherein the chemical activation is performed at about +4° C. or about +22° C.
P10. The vaccine of any one of P1-9, further comprising an adjuvant.
P11. The vaccine of P10, wherein the adjuvant is an aluminum salt adjuvant.
P12. The vaccine of P11, wherein the aluminum salt adjuvant is aluminium hydroxide or aluminium phosphate salt.
P13. The vaccine of any one of P10-12, wherein the vaccine comprises or further comprises an adjuvant comprising a peptide and a deoxyinosine-containing immunostimulatory oligodeoxynucleic acid molecule (I-ODN).
P14. The vaccine of P13, wherein the peptide comprises the sequence KLKL5KLK (SEQ ID NO: 71) and the I-ODN comprises oligo-d(IC)13 (SEQ ID NO: 70).
P15. The vaccine of any one of P1-14, further comprising one or more pharmaceutically acceptable excipient.
Q1. A process of purification of infectious virus particles, comprising the steps of:
(a) providing a crude harvest (a) comprising virus particles and impurities, wherein the impurities are generated from growing said virus particles on a cell substrate;
(b) reducing impurities from the crude harvest (a) by precipitation with an agent comprising protamine, preferably a protamine salt, more preferably a protamine sulphate, even more preferably a recombinant protamine sulphate, to obtain a virus preparation (b);
(c) further purifying the virus preparation (b) by an optimized sucrose density gradient centrifugation, wherein the optimized sucrose gradient is provided such that the protamine can be completely or almost completely separated from the virus fraction; and wherein the protamine concentration is reduced by this step to the extent that the protamine concentration in the final drug substance is below 1 μg/ml, preferably below 0.5 μg/mL, more preferably below 0.1 μg/mL, most preferably below 0.05 μg/mL.
Q2. The process of Q2, wherein the virus particles are selected from the group consisting of flaviviruses, e.g. yellow fever virus or Zika virus and alphaviruses, e.g. Chikungunya.
Q3. The process of Q1 or Q2, additionally comprising the step of:
(d) a solid-phase matrix packed in a column comprising a ligand-activated core and an inactive shell comprising pores, wherein the molecular weight cut off of the pores excludes the virus particles from entering the ligand-activated core, and wherein a molecule smaller than the molecular weight cutoff of the pores can enter the ligand-activated core and collecting the virus particles.
Q4. The process of any of Q1 to 3, wherein the residual host cell DNA of the virus preparation (c) is less than 10 ng/mL and the residual host cell protein of the final virus preparation (c) is less than 100 ng/mL.
Q5. The process of any of Q1 to 4, wherein the crude harvest (a) comprising virus particles and impurities is subjected to one or more pre-purification step(s) prior to step (b).
Q6. The process of Q5, wherein the one or more pre-purification step(s) comprises
(a) filtration using a filter having a pore size equal to or less than 0.2 μm; and/or
(b) digestion of host cell genomic DNA by enzymatic treatment; and/or
(c) ultra/diafiltration using a hollow fiber membrane having a pore size equal to or greater than 300 kDa, preferably equal to or greater than 100 kDa.
Q7. The process of any one of Q1 to 6, wherein the concentration of protamine sulphate is 0.5 to 3 mg/ml, more preferably 1 to 2 mg/ml, more preferably 1.2 to 1.8 mg/ml, more preferably 1.4 to 1.6 mg/ml, most preferably 1.6 mg/ml or 2 mg/ml.
Q8. The process of any one of Q1 to 7, wherein the enrichment of infectious virus particles in the virus preparation (c) or any final virus preparation relative to total virus products in the crude harvest (a) is in the range from at least 50% to 95%, preferably at least 80%.
Q9. The process of any one of Q5 to 8, wherein the one or more pre-purification step(s) prior to step (b) of any of Q5 to 8 is performed using a filter having a pore size equal to or less than 1 μm, preferably 0.2 μm.
Q10. The process of any one of Q1 to 9, wherein the residual impurity of the virus preparation
(c) is less than 10%.
Q11. The process of any one of Q1 to 10, wherein the virus is propagated in a cell line selected from the group consisting of an EB66 cell line, a Vero cell line, a Vero-αHis cell line, a HeLa cell line, a HeLa-S3 cell line, a 293 cell line, a PC12 cell line, a CHO cell line, a 3T3 cell line, a PerC6 cell line, a MDSK cell line, a chicken embryonic fibroblast cell line, a duck cell line, and a diploid avian cell line.
Q12. The process of Q11, wherein said cell line is a Vero cell line.
Q13. The process of any one of Q1 to 12, wherein the infectious virus particles is an infectious Zika virus particle that is a live virus, an attenuated live virus, a chimeric virus, a modified live virus, or a recombinant live virus.
Q14. The process of any one of Q1 to 13, wherein the Zika virus is a Zika virus strain of the Asian lineage or an immunogenic variant thereof.
Q15. The process of any one of Q1 to 14, wherein said process resulting in final virus preparation (c) or (d) is followed by an inactivation step, wherein the virus is inactivated preferably by formaldehyde.
Q16. Use of the process according to any one of Q1 to 15 for manufacturing a composition for immunization against a virus infection.
Q17. The use according to Q16, wherein the composition for immunization against a virus infection is an infection caused by a group of viruses consisting of yellow fever virus, Chikungunya virus and Zika virus.
Q18. A composition comprising the virus particles obtainable or obtained by the process of any one of Q1 to 17 for treating and/or preventing an infection, such as e.g. a Zika virus infection.
Q19. A Zika virus vaccine comprising an inactivated Zika virus particle grown on vero cells, wherein the Zika virus particle is able to seroconvert a subject that is administered the Zika virus vaccine with at least a 70% probability and comprises minor amounts of protamine sulphate, preferably below the detection limit.
Q20. The Zika virus vaccine of Q19, wherein the Zika virus particle is able to seroconvert the subject that is administered the Zika virus vaccine with at least a 80%, 85%, 90%, or 95% probability, preferably a 80% probability.
Q21. The vaccine of Q19 or 20, wherein the Zika virus particle has a RNA genome corresponding to the DNA sequence provided by any one of the nucleic acid sequences of SEQ ID NOs: 2-13, or a variant nucleic acid sequence that is at least 88% identical to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 2-13 and able to pack a virulent Zika virus.
Q22. The vaccine of any one of Q19, 20 and 21, wherein the Zika virus particle has an E protein selected from the amino acid sequences provided by any one of SEQ ID NOs: 14-69, or a variant amino acid sequence that is at least 95% identical to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 14-69 and able to pack a virulent Zika virus.
Q23. The vaccine of any one of Q19, 20 to 22, wherein the Zika virus obtained by culturing on Vero cells is purified by protamine sulfate precipitation and sucrose gradient centrifugation.
Q24. The vaccine of Q23, wherein the sucrose gradient centrifugation is an optimized sucrose gradient centrifugation.
Q25. The vaccine of Q24, wherein the optimized sucrose gradient centrifugation comprises a virus comprising fraction in a 10% (w/w) sucrose solution and three layers of sucrose with different densities, i.e. a first sucrose solution with 15% (w/w) sucrose solution, a second sucrose solution with 35% (w/w) sucrose solution, and a third sucrose solution with a 50% (w/w) sucrose solution.
Q26. The vaccine of any one of Q19, 20 to 25, wherein the Zika virus is inactivated by chemical inactivation, thermal inactivation, pH inactivation, or UV inactivation.
Q27. The vaccine of Q26, wherein the chemical inactivation comprises contacting the Zika virus with a chemical inactivation agent for longer than is required to completely inactivate the Zika virus as measured by plaque assay.
Q28. The vaccine of Q27, wherein the chemical inactivation comprises contacting the Zika virus with formaldehyde.
Q29. The vaccine of Q28, wherein the formaldehyde inactivation comprises contacting the Zika virus with formaldehyde for between 2-10 days.
Q30. The vaccine of any one of Q27-29, wherein the chemical activation is performed at about +4° C. or about +22° C.
Q31. The vaccine of any one of Q19 to 30, further comprising an adjuvant.
Q32. The vaccine of Q31, wherein the adjuvant is an aluminum salt adjuvant.
Q33. The vaccine of Q32, wherein the aluminum salt adjuvant is aluminium hydroxide or aluminium phosphate salt.
Q34. The vaccine of Q32, wherein the aluminum salt adjuvant is aluminium hydroxide with less than 1.25 ppb Cu based on the final pharmaceutical composition comprising the Zika virus, preferably the inactivated Zika virus.
Q35. The vaccine of any one of Q19 to 34, further comprising one or more pharmaceutically acceptable excipient.
R1. Use of protamine, preferably a protamine salt, to separate infectious and non-infectious virus particles, host cell proteins and/or undefined low molecular weight materials.
R2. A process of purification of infectious virus particles, comprising the steps of:
(a) providing a crude harvest (a) comprising virus particles and impurities, wherein the impurities are generated from growing said virus particles on a cell substrate;
(b) reducing impurities from the crude harvest (a) by precipitation with an agent comprising protamine, preferably a protamine salt, more preferably a protamine sulphate, even more preferably a recombinant protamine sulphate, to obtain a virus preparation (b), wherein the enrichment of infectious virus particles in the virus preparation (b) relative to total virus products in the crude harvest (a) is in the range from at least 50% to 95%, preferably at least 80%.
R3. The use of R1 or the process of R2, wherein the virus particles are selected from the group consisting of flaviviruses, e.g. yellow fever virus or Zika virus and alphaviruses, e.g.
Chikungunya.
R4. A process of purification of infectious virus particles, comprising the steps of:
(a) providing a crude harvest (a) comprising virus particles and impurities, wherein the impurities are generated from growing said virus particles on a cell substrate;
(b) reducing impurities from the crude harvest (a) by precipitation with an agent comprising protamine, preferably a protamine salt, more preferably a protamine sulphate, even more preferably a recombinant protamine sulphate, to obtain a virus preparation (b);
(c) further purifying the virus preparation (b) by one or more size exclusion methods such as (i) a sucrose density gradient centrifugation, (ii) a solid-phase matrix packed in a column comprising a ligand-activated core and an inactive shell comprising pores, wherein the molecular weight cut off of the pores excludes the virus particles from entering the ligand-activated core, and wherein a molecule smaller than the molecular weight cutoff of the pores can enter the ligand-activated core and collecting the virus particles, and/or (iii) size exclusion chromatography to obtain a virus preparation (c) comprising the infectious virus particles, wherein the residual host cell DNA of the virus preparation (c) is less than 100 ng/mL and the residual host cell protein and the residual aggregates of infectious virus particles of the final virus preparation (c) is less than 1 μg/mL.
R5. The process of R4, wherein the residual host cell DNA of the virus preparation (c) is less than 10 ng/mL and the residual host cell protein of the final virus preparation (c) is less than 100 ng/mL.
R6. The process of any of R2 to 5, wherein the crude harvest (a) comprising virus particles and impurities is subjected to one or more pre-purification step(s) prior to step (b).
R7. The process of R6, wherein the one or more pre-purification step(s) comprises
(a) filtration using a filter having a pore size equal to or less than 0.2 μm; and/or
(b) digestion of host cell genomic DNA by enzymatic treatment; and/or
(c) ultra/diafiltration using a hollow fiber membrane having a pore size equal to or greater than 300 kDa, preferably equal to or greater than 100 kDa.
R8. The process of any one of R2 to 7, wherein the concentration of protamine sulphate is 0.5 to 3 mg/ml, more preferably 1 to 2 mg/ml, more preferably 1.2 to 1.8 mg/ml, more preferably 1.4 to 1.6 mg/ml, most preferably 1.6 mg/ml.
R9. The process of any one of R2 to 8, wherein the enrichment of infectious virus particles in the virus preparation (c) or any final virus preparation relative to total virus products in the crude harvest (a) is in the range from at least 50% to 95%, preferably at least 80%.
R10. The process of any one of R6 to 9, wherein the one or more pre-purification step(s) prior to step (b) of any of R6 to 9 is performed using a filter having a pore size equal to or less than 1 μm, preferably 0.2 μm.
R11. The process of any one of R2 to 10, wherein the residual impurity of the virus preparation (c) is less than 10%.
R12. The process of any one of R2 to 11, wherein the virus is propagated in a cell line selected from the group consisting of an EB66 cell line, a Vero cell line, a Vero-αHis cell line, a HeLa cell line, a HeLa-S3 cell line, a 293 cell line, a PC12 cell line, a CHO cell line, a 3T3 cell line, a PerC6 cell line, a MDSK cell line, a chicken embryonic fibroblast cell line, a duck cell line, and a diploid avian cell line.
R13. The process of R12, wherein said cell line is a Vero cell line.
R14. The process of any one of R2 to 13, wherein the Zika virus is a live virus, an attenuated live virus, a chimeric virus, a modified live virus, or a recombinant live virus.
R15. The process of any one of R2 to 14, wherein the Zika virus is a Zika virus strain of the Asian lineage or an immunogenic variant thereof.
R16. The process of any one of R2 to 15, wherein said process resulting in final virus preparation (c) is followed by an inactivation step, wherein the virus is inactivated preferably by formaldehyde.
R17. Use of the process according to any one of R1 to 16 for manufacturing a composition for immunization against a virus infection.
R18. The use according to R17, wherein the composition for immunization against a virus infection is an infection caused by a group of viruses consisting of yellow fever virus, Chikungunya virus and Zika virus.
R19. A composition comprising the virus particles obtainable or obtained by the process of any one of R2 to 16 for treating and/or preventing an infection.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15202585 | Dec 2015 | EP | regional |
| 16161068 | Mar 2016 | EP | regional |
| 16176025 | Jun 2016 | EP | regional |
| 16176049 | Jun 2016 | EP | regional |
| 16182845 | Aug 2016 | EP | regional |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2016/082663 | 12/23/2016 | WO | 00 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2017/109224 | 6/29/2017 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6309650 | Kim et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 7871814 | Andino-Pavlovsky | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 8765148 | Wizel et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 9499588 | Mason | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 10086061 | Thomas | Oct 2018 | B2 |
| 10537630 | Barbero Calzado et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
| 20180362936 | Barbero Calzado et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20180369359 | Barbero Calzado et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20180371027 | Barbero Calzado et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20190008945 | Barbero Calzado et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 105749268 | Jul 2016 | CN |
| WO 1999011762 | Mar 1999 | WO |
| WO 2001092552 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| WO 2013083726 | Jun 2013 | WO |
| WO 2016145149 | Sep 2016 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/062,245, filed Jun. 14, 2018, Barbero Calzado et al. |
| PCT/EP2016/082663, Jul. 5, 2018, International Preliminary Report and Patentability. |
| PCT/EP2016/082663, Apr. 19, 2017, International Search Report and Written Opinion. |
| PCT/EP2016/082662, Jul. 5, 2018, International Preliminary Report and Patentability. |
| PCT/EP2016/082662, Apr. 18, 2017, International Search Report and Written Opinion. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/702,764, filed Dec. 4, 2019, Barbero Calzado et al. |
| [No Author Listed] Valneva Reports Excellent Final Phase 1 Results for its Chikungunya Vaccine Candidate, Confirms Plans. Press release. Nov. 18, 2019. |
| [No Author Listed] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Ingredients of vaccines fact sheet; continuously updated; https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/additives.htm. |
| [No Author Listed] Japanese Encephalitis Vaccine. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2016. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/japaneseencephalitis/vaccine/ on Jun. 16, 2016. |
| [No Author Listed] Pan-American Health Organization, 2015. Number of Reported Cases of Chikungunya Fever in the Americas, by Country or Territory 2013-2014. Cumulative Cases (Updated Oct. 23, 2015). |
| [No Author Listed] Protamine sulfate. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., 2015. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protamine_sulfate; updated Sep. 30, 2015 on Nov. 26, 2015. |
| [No Author Listed] Valneva Announces Successful Generation of a Highly-purified Zika Vaccine Candidate Using its FDA-EMA Approved Japanese Encephalitis Platform. Press release. Jul. 7, 2016. |
| [No Author Listed] World Health Organization, 2016Zika Situation Report Feb. 5, 2016. |
| [No Author Listed] World Health Organization, 2016Zika Virus Fact Sheet 2016. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/zika/en/ on Mar. 11, 2016. |
| [No Author Listed] Zika virus, strain H/PF/2013. European virus archive, 2016. |
| Abbink et al., Durability and correlates of vaccine protection against Zika virus in rhesus monkeys. Sci. Transl. Med. 9, eaao4163 (2017). |
| Altschul et al., Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990;215:403-410. |
| Altschul et al., Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nuc. Acids Res. 1997;25(17):3389-3402. |
| Baronti et al., Complete Coding Sequence of Zika Virus from a French Polynesia Outbreak in 2013. Genome Announc. May-Jun. 2014; 2(3):e00500-14. Abstract. |
| Bender et al., Zika Virus Vaccine Candidate VLA1601: Cooperation Valneva & Emergent. Presentation at World Vaccine Congress Apr. 4, 2018. |
| Cohen, Infectious Disease. The race for a Zika vaccine is on. Science. Feb. 5, 2016;351(6273):543-4. doi: 10.1126/science.351.6273.543. |
| Cox et al., Predicting Zika virus structural biology:Challenges and opportunities for intervention. Antivir Chem Chemother. Aug. 2015;24(3-4):118-26. doi: 10.1177/2040206616653873. Epub Jun. 13, 2016. |
| Dowall et al., A susceptible mouse model for Zika virus infection. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.10(5):e0004658. May 5, 2016. DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0004658. |
| Fritsche et al., Vaccine hypersensitivity—update and overview. Swiss Med Wkly. 2010;140(17-18):238-246. |
| Gardner et al., Deliberate Attenuation of Chikungunya Virus by Adaptation to Heparan Sulfate-Dependent Infectivity: A Model of Rational Arboviral Vaccine Design. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2014;8(2):e2719. |
| Geradin et al., Chikungunya virus-associated encephalitis: A cohort study on La Réunion Island. 2005-2009. Neurology. 86(1):94-102. |
| Gubler et al., Fields Virology. Knipe DM, Howley PM, editors. Lippincott-Raven Publishers; Philadelphia: 2007. pp. 1153-1252. |
| Haddow et al., Genetic Characterization of Zika Virus Strains: Geographic Expansion of the Asian Lineage. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 6(2): e1477. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001477. |
| Hallengard et al., Novel Attenuated Chikungunya Vaccine Candidates Elicit Protective Immunity in C57BL/6 mice. J. Virology 88(5):2858-2866. |
| Hallengard et al., Prime-Boost Immunization Strategies against Chikungunya Virus. J. Virology. 88(22):13333-13343. |
| Hombach et al., Report on a WHO consultation on immunological endpoints for evaluation of new Japanese encephalitis vaccines, WHO, Geneva, Sep. 2-3, 2004. Vaccine. 2005; 23(45):5205-5211. |
| Hutornojs et al., Comparison of ultracentrifugation methods for concentration of recombinant alphaviruses: sucrose and iodixanol cushions. Environmental Experimental Biology. 2012;10:117-123. |
| Katoh et al., Recent developments in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Briefings in Bioinformatics. 2008;9(4):286-298. |
| Kim et al., Design of Chimeric Alphaviruses with a Programmed, Attenuated, Cell Type-Restricted Phenotype. J Virol. 2011;85(9):4363-4376. |
| Konishi et al., Studies on structural proteins of Chikungunya Virus. I. Separation of three species of proteins and their preliminary characterization. Microbiol Immunol. 1980;24(5):419-28. |
| Larkin et al., Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(21):2947-2948. |
| Larocca et al., Vaccine protection against Zika virus from Brazil. Nature. 2016;536:474-478. doi:10.1038/nature18952. Methods. |
| Lindenbach et al., Fields Virology. Knipe DM, Howley PM, editors. Lippincott-Raven Publishers; Philadelphia: 2007. pp. 1101-1152. |
| Malone et al., Zika Virus: Medical Countermeasure Development Challenges. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(3):e0004530. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0004530. |
| Modjarrad et al., Preliminary aggregate safety and immunogenicity results from three trials of a purified inactivated Zika virus vaccine candidate: phase 1, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Dec. 4, 2017. |
| Monath, Yellow fever: an update. Lancet Infect Dis. 2001;1(1):11-20. |
| Needleman et al., A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1970;48(3):443-453. |
| Patkar et al., Yellow Fever virus NS3 plays an essential role in virus assembly independent of its known enzymatic functions. J Virol. Apr. 2008;82(7):3342-52. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02447-07. Epub Jan. 16, 2008. |
| Pearson et al., Improved tools for biological sequence comparison. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1988;85(8):2444-8. |
| Pellerin, Walter Reed Scientists Test Zika Vaccine Candidate. U.S. Department of Defense. Jun. 9, 2016. |
| Pinto et al., A Temporal Role of Type I Interferon Signaling in CD8+ T Cell Maturation during Acute West Nile Virus Infection. PLoS Pathog. Dec. 2011;7(12): e1002407. |
| Plevka et al., Maturation of flaviviruses starts from one or more icosahedrally independent nucleation centres. EMBO reports. 2011;12(6):602-606. |
| Reed et al., A simple method of estimating fifty percent endpoints. American J Hygiene. May 1938;27:493-497. |
| Rocha et al., Microcephaly: normality parameters and its determinants in northeastern Brazil: a multicentre prospective cohort study. Bull World Health Organ, E-pub: Feb. 8, 2016. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2471/BLT.16.171215. |
| Rozen-Gagnon et al., Alphavirus Mutator Variants Present Host-Specific Defects and Attenuation in Mammalian and Insect Models, PLOS Pathogens, 10(1):e1003877. |
| Schlegl et al., Influence of elemental impurities in aluminum hydroxide adjuvant on the stability of inactivated Japanese Encephalitis vaccine, IXIARO®. Vaccine. 2015;33(44):5989-5996. |
| Shustov et al., Efficient, trans-complementing packaging systems for chimeric, pseudoinfectious dengue 2/yellow fever viruses. Virology. Apr. 25, 2010;400(1):8-17. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2009.12.015. |
| Simizu et al., Structural Proteins of Chikungunya Virus, J Virol. 1984;51(1): 254-258. |
| Smith et al., Comparison of Biosequences. Adv. Appl. Math. 1981;2:482-489. |
| Srivastava et al., A purified inactivated Japanese encephalitis virus vaccine made in vero cells. Vaccine. 2001;19:4557-4565. |
| Tiwari et al., Assessment of immunogenic potential of Vero adapted formalin inactivated vaccine derived from novel ECSA genotype of Chikungunya virus. Vaccine. Apr. 21, 2009;27(18):2513-22. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.02.062. Epub Feb. 27, 2009. |
| Vega-Rua et al., Chikungunya Virus Transmission Potential by Local Aedes Mosquitoes in the Americas and Europe. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2015;9(5):e000378 |
| Waterhouse et al., Jalview Version 2—a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(9):1189-1191. |
| Way et al., Comparative Studies of some African Arboviruses in Cell Culture and in Mice, J Gen. Virol. 1976;30:123-130. |
| Weaver et al., Arrival of Chiungunya Virus in the New Word: Prospects for Spread and Impact on Public Health. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(6): e2921. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0002921. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20180362937 A1 | Dec 2018 | US |
