The present invention relates generally to a system and technique for presenting relational information and, more particularly, to a tool and process for automatically presenting a visual representation of a relationship between entities involved in a commercial deal.
In today's real estate environment, a typical commercial deal such as a loan transaction, servicing agreement, or cash management agreement may involve numerous entities such as loan assets, businesses, and properties that serve as collateral, for example. The relationships among and obligations of such entities may be quite complicated and may become more complex over the lifetime of the commercial deal. Effectively comprehending and communicating the nature of a deal may be a cumbersome task involving a length study of detailed financial documentation and complex ownership structures, servicing relationships, and cash flows.
To alleviate some of this complexity, an underwriter may choose to create a visual representation of the commercial deal. The visual representation may be used, for example, as an exhibit to summarize and/or verify details of the deal. While a visual representation indeed may be useful, creating such a visual representation may be a complex process in itself. Namely, an underwriter typically must sort through the text of loan documents and agreements to extrapolate the relevant information and then use a peripheral tool to generate a diagram of the transaction. In general, the peripheral tool may be a software application that allows a user to define a structure by manually selecting and interconnecting various shapes. An example of a peripheral tool that may be used in this scenario is the Microsoft® Visio® Organization Chart application.
The use of a peripheral tool to create a visual representation duplicates work and allows for a high margin of error and possible misrepresentation of information. Accordingly, there exists the need for a system and method for automatically presenting a visual representation of a relationship between entities involved in a commercial deal such as a loan transaction, servicing agreement, or cash management agreement.
In one general aspect, a commercial deal is graphically represented by defining entities, assigning roles for relating entities, accessing commercial deal information corresponding to the entities, defining objects for related entities, and automatically generating a visual representation depicting a relationship between entities involved in a commercial deal.
Implementations may include one or more of the following features. For example, the commercial deal may include one or more loan transactions, servicing agreements, and/or cash management agreements. The entities may include assets, businesses, individuals, properties, collateral, and/or accounts. The roles may include borrower, shareholder, investment, property manager, underwriter, principal, closer, employer, and employee.
Entities may be defined by receiving entity information describing specific attributes of the entities such as entity type, tax identification number, name, telephone number, facsimile number, address, website address, and/or parent company relationship. Roles may be assigned by receiving role information associated with a selected entity such as the specific roles assumed by the entity, the timing of each specific role, role relationship information for associating the selected entity with one or more other entities, and/or assignment information for assigning a selected entity to the commercial deal.
The role relationship information may include roles assumed by a selected entity, the identity of other entities related to the selected entity, roles assumed by each of the other entities, and/or exposure of each other entity. The assignment information may include roles assumed by a selected entity, associated type, the entity to associate, and/or timing of each role. The commercial deal information may include one or more of loan information, property information, cash management agreement information, and servicing agreement information.
The objects may include one or more of a shape, an image, a picture, a photograph, and a graphic. Objects may be defined by automatically associating an object with an entity based on one or more of entity information, role information, and commercial deal information. Generating the visual representation may involve automatically making connections between objects to convey the relationship between entities.
Implementations also may include incorporating the visual representation into the commercial deal information and/or rendering the visual representation to a user as structure of objects joined by connectors. The structure may be rendered in multiple modes and multiple levels. The modes may correspond to ownership structures, cash flow structures, and servicing relationship structures. Increasing levels may increase the number of objects displayed in the visual representation.
Aspects of the present invention may be implemented by an apparatus and/or by a computer program stored on a computer readable medium. The computer readable medium may comprise a disk, a client device, a network device, a host device, and/or a propagated signal.
Other features and advantages will be apparent from the following description, including the drawings, and from the claims.
As shown, the communications system 10 includes a client system 110 connected through a network 115 to a host system 120. The client system 110 and the host system 120 are configured to communicate and exchange information through the network 115. The host system 120 may include and/or form part of an information delivery network, such as, for example, the Internet, the World Wide Web (Web), an on-line service provider, a private network, and/or any other analog or digital wired and/or wireless network that provides information.
In general, the client system 110 includes a computer system having hardware and/or software components for communicating with the network 115 and the host system 120. The client system 110 and host system 120 each may include one or more general-purpose computers (e.g., personal computers and/or servers), one or more special-purpose computers (e.g., devices specifically programmed to communicate with each other), or a combination of one or more general-purpose computers and one or more special-purpose computers. The client system 110 and host system 120 may be structured and arranged to communicate using various communication protocols (e.g., HTTP, TCP/IP, WAP, UDP) to establish connections between network elements and/or to operate within or in concert with one or more other systems (e.g., the Internet and/or Web).
In one implementation, the client system 110 and the host system 120 each include a device (e.g., client device 112, host device 122) operating under the command of a controller (e.g., client controller 114, host controller 124). The broken lines are intended to indicate that in some implementations, the controller, or portions thereof considered collectively, may instruct one or more elements of the device to operate as described. Accordingly, the function of automatically presenting a visual representation of a relationship between entities involved in a commercial deal may be implemented as software controlling one or more elements of the client system 110 and/or the host system 120.
An example of a device is a general-purpose computer capable of responding to and executing instructions in a defined manner. Other examples include a special-purpose computer, a personal computer (PC), a workstation, a server, a laptop computer, a web-enabled telephone, a web-enabled personal digital assistant (PDA), a microprocessor, and integrated circuit, or any other component, machine, tool, equipment, or some combination thereof capable of responding to and executing instructions.
An example of a controller is a software application (e.g., operating system, browser application, client application, server application, proxy application, on-line service provider application, and/or private network application) installed on a device for directing communications. Other examples include, a computer program, code, set of instructions, or some combination thereof, for independently or collectively instructing the device to interact and operate as programmed. The controller may be implemented utilizing any suitable computer language (e.g., Java, Perl, C or C++) and/or object-oriented techniques. The controller also may be a device, such as a workstation or PC, a microprocessor, a network server, a Java virtual machine, or an application-specific integrated circuit.
The controller may be embodied permanently or temporarily in any type of machine, component, physical or virtual equipment, storage medium, or propagated signal capable of delivering instructions to a device. In particular, the controller (e.g., software application, computer program) may be stored on a storage medium (e.g., disk, device, or propagated signal), readable by a computer system, such that if the storage medium is read by the computer system, the functions described herein are performed.
The network 115 may include one or more delivery systems for directly or indirectly connecting the client system 110 and the host system 120. Examples of delivery systems include, but are not limited to, a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), the Internet, the Web, a telephony network (e.g., analog, digital, wired, wireless, PSTN, ISDN, or xDSL), a radio network, a television network, a cable network, a satellite network, and/or any other wired or wireless communications network configured to carry data. Each network may include one or more elements, such as, for example, intermediate nodes, proxy servers, firewalls, routers, switches, adapters, sockets, and wired or wireless data pathways, configured to direct and/or deliver data.
The client system 110 and the host system 120 communicate in order to present a visual representation depicting a relationship between entities involved in a commercial deal. In one implementation, the client system 110 may include a personal computer running a browser application and the host system 120 may include one or more servers running various software applications (e.g., Web applications). The client system 110 may display various graphical user interfaces (UIs), such as Web pages, that request input from and deliver content to the user. For example, the user may input requested information into a series of UIs and then be presented with a visual representation depicting a relationship between entities involved in a commercial deal.
As shown in
In general, the LPS 126 and the LMS 128 may perform data entry, data retrieval, and/or data processing for integrating and automating a commercial deal. For example, the LPS 126 and the LMS 128 may perform various functions related to origination and underwriting, servicing and asset management, accounting, investor reporting and special servicing. In one embodiment, the LPS 126 and/or the LMS 128 may include or form part of one or more of the systems described in co-pending U.S. patent application. Ser. No. 10/336,501, entitled “Methods and Systems for Asset/Loan Management and Processing,” which was filed on Jan. 3, 2003 and is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Referring to
The procedure 200 will be described below with reference to
At step 210, an entity is defined. An entity may be, for instance, an asset, a business or business unit, an individual, a loan, collateral such as property, an account, and/or any other component of a commercial deal. The commercial deal may include one or more transactions such as, for example, loan transactions, servicing agreements, and/or cash management agreements.
In one implementation, a particular entity involved in a commercial deal may be defined by receiving entity information that describes specific attributes of the entity. The entity information may include, for example, data such as entity type (e.g., individual, corporation, limited partnership, limited liability company), tax identification number, company name, telephone number, facsimile number, address (e.g., street, city, state, postal code, country), website address, and parent company relationship.
The entity information may be received from one or more of the client system 110, the network 115, and/or the host system 120. In some cases, the entity information may be input by a user of a client system 110 and delivered across a network 115 to the host system 120. For example, a user may enter data into one or more graphical UIs structured and arranged to solicit and/or display the entity information. In other cases, the entity information may be extracted from one or more electronic files residing in the host system 120. For example, electronic files containing data pertaining to a commercial deal may be stored in the host system 120 and continuously updated over the lifetime of the deal. The data from these electronic files may be extracted and utilized by the host system 120 in response to a command to graphically depict the relationship among entities involved in the commercial deal.
The UI 30 includes browser window 301 configured to display content of a Web site and receive user input. The browser window 301 includes a tool bar 302 for navigating to various areas of the Web site such as a Dashboard area, a Tools area, a Risk Management area, a Data Management area, a Policy area, a System area, a Help area, and a Logout area. The browser window 301 also includes an Entity tab 303, a Related Roles tab 304, an Assignments tab 305, a Roles tab 306, a Financials tab 307, a Credit tab 308, and a Ratings tab 309 for displaying pages corresponding to the tabs.
As shown, the browser window 301 displays an Entity page 310 including text entry boxes 311 for viewing and/or entering entity information. The Entity page 310 may be displayed, for example, when the Entity tab 303 is selected. When presented with the Entity page 310, a user may input text and/or use pull-down menus to enter the entity information into the appropriate text entry boxes 311. The Entity page 310 also includes a Save button 312 for saving entity information, a View List button 313 for viewing a list of entities, a Map button 314 for mapping the location of an entity, a Notes button 315 for entering or displaying comments, a Help button 316 for displaying help information, a Prev button 317 for displaying the previous page, and a Next button 318 for displaying the next page.
At step 220, roles for relating entities are assigned. In general, an entity may assume various roles in a commercial deal and each role may define the relationship of the entity to another entity, an asset, and/or the commercial deal as a whole. Some examples of roles that may be assigned to an entity include, but are not limited to: borrower, shareholder, investment, property manager, underwriter, principal, closer, employer, employee, and/or other part assumed in a commercial deal.
In one implementation, roles may be assigned by receiving role information associated with a selected entity. The role information may include, for instance, the specific roles assumed by the selected entity, the timing (e.g., beginning date, ending date) of each specific role. The role information further may include role relationship information for associating the selected entity with one or more other entities and assignment information for assigning a selected (primary) entity to the commercial or asset. The role relationship information may include, but is not limited to: the roles assumed by a selected entity, the identity (e.g., name, contact information) of other entities related to the selected entity, the role assumed by each of the other entities, and the exposure of each other entity. The assignment information may include, but is not limited to: the roles assumed by a selected (primary) entity, the associated type (e.g., asset, deal), the entity to associate, and the timing (e.g., beginning date, ending date) of each role.
For example, in a particular loan transaction, Company A may have a role as a borrower as well as additional roles as a shareholder of Company B and an investment of Company C. Company A may be considered the primary entity due to its role as the borrower and thus may be assigned to the asset or deal in this case. With respect to Company A, Company B may be designated the role of investment and Company C may be designated the role of shareholder. Assuming complete ownership by each shareholder, the exposure of each shareholder is 100%.
The role information may be received from one or more of the client system 110, the network 115, and/or the host system 120. In some cases, the role information may be input by a user of a client system 110 and delivered across a network 115 to the host system 120. For example, a user may enter data into one or more graphical UIs structured and arranged to solicit and/or display the role relationship information. In other cases, the role relationship information may be extracted from one or more electronic files residing in the host system 120. For example, electronic files containing data pertaining to a commercial deal may be stored in the host system 120 and continuously updated over the lifetime of the deal. The data from these electronic files may be extracted and utilized by the host system 120 in response to a command to graphically depict the relationship among entities involved in the commercial deal.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
At step 230, commercial deal information corresponding to associated entities is accessed. In general, the commercial deal information includes specific details of a relationship between associated entities. For example, the commercial deal information may include details regarding the relationships and obligations of entities involved in loan transactions, servicing agreements, and/or cash management agreements.
In an implementation, where entities are involved in a loan transaction, the commercial deal information may include specific details of the loan such as loan name, loan status, loan number, loan date, loan term, rate type (e.g., fixed or variable), interest rate, loan amount, and/or other attributes of the loan. The commercial deal information also may include specific details of the property associated with the loan such as property name, loan name, lien type, allocated percentage of loan, property type, square footage or units, allocated loan balance, engineering and environmental reports, tenants, valuator, valuation, and/or other attributes of the property.
In an implementation, where entities are involved in a servicing agreement, the commercial deal information may include specific details of the conditions and services provided among entities (e.g., trust, third-party servicer) and/or any other attributes of the servicing agreement. In an implementation where entities are involved in a cash management agreement, the commercial deal information may include specific details of property and deal level cash flow streams and waterfall requirements among entities (e.g., bank accounts) and/or any other attributes of the cash management agreement.
The commercial deal information may be accessed from one or more of the client system 110, the network 115, and/or the host system 120. In some cases, the commercial deal information may be input by a user of a client system 110 and delivered across a network 115 to the host system 120. For example, a user may enter data into one or more graphical UIs structured and arranged to solicit and/or display the role relationship information. In other cases, the role relationship information may be extracted from one or more electronic files residing in the host system 120. For example, electronic files containing data pertaining to a commercial deal may be stored in the host system 120 and continuously updated over the lifetime of the deal. The data from these electronic files may be extracted and utilized by the host system 120 in response to a command to graphically depict the relationship among entities involved in the commercial deal.
In one embodiment, the commercial deal information may be input into and/or accessed from one or more of the systems described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/336,501, entitled “Methods and Systems for Asset/Loan Management and Processing,” which was filed on Jan. 3, 2003 and is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
At step 240, an object is defined for each associated entity. In general, each entity involved in a commercial deal may be represented as an object. An object may be, for example, a shape, an image, a picture, a photograph, a graphic, and/or any other type of element capable of depicting the entity in a graphical representation of the deal.
In one implementation, an object may be defined by associating a shape or image with a particular entity. In some cases, the associated shape or image may correspond to the type of entity. For example, a loan may be associated with a shaded rectangle, an individual may be associated with an image of a person, and a property may be associated with an image of a building. In other cases, the associated shape or image may be unique for each entity or the same for all entities.
In one embodiment, an object may be associated with an entity automatically according to information entered into and/or stored in the system (e.g., client system 110, host system 120). For instance, entities may be associated with objects automatically based on one or more of the entity information, the role information, and the commercial deal information. In some cases, objects may auto-fill based on the entity information, role information, and/or commercial information. For example, an object representing an entity may be labeled to include information such as the name of the entity (e.g., business name), the role of the entity (e.g., borrower), and/or transactional information (e.g., loan amount).
A system (e.g., client system 110, host system 120) may automatically associate entities with objects. In addition, a user may have the ability to directly associate entities with objects and/or supplement information included with objects. For instance, a user may select an object that will be used to depict an entity and then add text or further details to the object. The user also may edit the shape, image, and/or text of a user-selected object and/or an object automatically associated by the system. In some situations, the user may associate multiple entities with a single object in order to simply the structure of the commercial deal.
At step 250, a visual representation depicting a relationship between entities involved in the commercial deal is generated automatically. In general, connections are made automatically between various objects to convey the relationship between entities. In one implementation, the connections between objects are made based on information entered into a system (e.g., client system 110 and/or host system 120). Such information may include, but is not limited to entity information, role information, and/or commercial deal information.
Because the connections between objects are made automatically, the user does not need to extrapolate data, determine which objects and connections are necessary, or rely on an external program. In addition, flexibility is provided for continuously and automatically updating the visual representations as the structure of the deal, assets, and/or entities changes over time. For example, the system (e.g., client system 110 and/or host system 120) may auto-generate a beginning connecting structure and then adapt the structure as the commercial deal evolves by adding, moving, connecting, and/or reconnecting multiple connectors and objects.
At step 260, the visual representation is incorporated into the commercial deal information. In general, each visual representation may be saved and attached to an appropriate commercial deal. In one implementation, the visual representation may be saved as part of the commercial deal information (e.g., loan record or collateral record) to provide a user with a comprehensive record of the deal. As such, a user may have access to the specific details of the commercial deal as well as a visual representation of the commercial deal without having to locate a file in a peripheral directory.
Once generated, the visual representation may be rendered to a user. In one implementation, the visual representation may be rendered to a user through a client system 110, such as a personal computer running a browser application. The visual representation may be presented as a graphical UI, such as a Web page. The UI may be configured to display the visual representation to the user in response to a command to graphically depict the relationship among entities involved in a commercial deal.
In one embodiment, the visual representation may include a structure of interconnected objects. The structure may be, for example, an organizational chart, a flow chart, a process chart, a block diagram, a tree diagram, a network diagram, a conceptual diagram, a relational diagram, a map, and/or any other interrelationship structure. In general, the visual representation may depict the relationship among entities as connectors joining the objects associated with the entities. Each connector may be displayed as a line segment having end points at related objects. The connectors also may be labeled with text to identify the particular type of relationship. In some cases, the connector may have characteristics (e.g., color, thickness, dashed, etc.) depending on the type of relationship between entities.
In one implementation, the visual representation may be displayed in one or more modes to convey relational information for various scenarios. For example, a user may be able to specify through a dropdown field the mode and/or level at which to view the presented information. In general, the visual representation may have modes corresponding to ownership structures, cash flow diagrams, and/or servicing relationship diagrams. By selecting the desired mode, a user may view multiple charts (e.g., ownership structures, cash flow diagrams, and/or servicing relationship diagrams) based on the same underlying information.
In addition, each visual representation may have multiple levels of detail. For example, at level one, only certain entities may be represented, while changing the field to level two or level three may allow the user to view all related entities within the structure. In one implementation, the level may correspond to roles and/or relationships of the commercial deal. Namely, at a particular level only those objects representing entities having certain roles and/or relationships are displayed. In general, a level one view will provide a high-level structure displaying objects representing the fundamental entities of the commercial deal. Increasing levels, in turn, increases the number of objects displayed in the visual representation.
In some embodiments, several visual representations corresponding to various modes and levels may be presented to a user for selection of the most appropriate visual representation. In other embodiments, a default visual representation may be presented to a user based on the type of commercial deal. The user may be provided with the ability to manipulate the visual representation so that the structure that best fits the parameters of the commercial deal is displayed. Tools may be provided to move, edit, and/or combine objects in the visual representation. In addition, search buttons and criteria may be provided to locate specific data in the underlying information and/or visual representation.
Referring to
Referring to
As shown, the relationships between the loan asset 402 and each of the first property 403 and the second property 404 are depicted as first lien connectors, the relationship between the first business 405 and the loan asset 402 is depicted as a borrower connector, the relationship between the second business 406 and the loan asset 402 is depicted as a manager connector, and the relationship between the second business 406 and the first business 405 is depicted as an investment connector. In addition, the relationships between the third business 407 and each of the first property 403 and the second property 404 are depicted as property manager connectors. The relationship between the first business 405 and each of the third business 407, the fourth business 408, and the fifth business 409 are depicted as investments connectors.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
As described and illustrated, aspects of the present invention allow a user to efficiently create ownership structures, cash flow structure, and/or serving agreement structures related to a commercial deal. Using this technology, information underlying the ownership structure and entity relationships is input and incorporated to provide a user with a graphical representation of the commercial deal. The graphical representation may depict connections among entities (e.g., collateral to borrower, owner to property, property to property manager, etc.) illustrating the overall deal structure. Accordingly, a user may gain a better understanding of the ownership structure and cash flow as well as the servicing relationship or potential relationship should a loan be securitized, for example. This allows not only for enhanced data validation of the complex ownership and loan structures of a commercial deal, but also allows for a fluid and dynamic visual representation of flat data. Additionally, because the visual representation is generated automatically, the need for peripheral programs is eliminated.
A number of implementations have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made and that other implementations are within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4736294 | Gill et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4774664 | Campbell | Sep 1988 | A |
4800504 | Durst, Jr. | Jan 1989 | A |
4876648 | Lloyd | Oct 1989 | A |
4914587 | Clouse | Apr 1990 | A |
5058009 | Yoshino | Oct 1991 | A |
5220500 | Baird | Jun 1993 | A |
5241466 | Perry et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5283829 | Anderson | Feb 1994 | A |
5323315 | Highbloom | Jun 1994 | A |
5383113 | Kight et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5465206 | Hilt et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5483445 | Pickering | Jan 1996 | A |
5544255 | Smithies et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550971 | Brunner et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550976 | Henderson | Aug 1996 | A |
5557515 | Abbruzzese et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5563783 | Stolfo et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5615268 | Bisbee et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5629981 | Nerlikar | May 1997 | A |
5630127 | Moore et al. | May 1997 | A |
5649116 | McCoy et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5649117 | Landry | Jul 1997 | A |
5673402 | Ryan et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5696907 | Tom | Dec 1997 | A |
5699528 | Hogan | Dec 1997 | A |
5704045 | King et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5712960 | Chiopris et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5724577 | Exley et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5734890 | Case et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5761441 | Bennett | Jun 1998 | A |
5765144 | Larche et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774883 | Andersen et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5787443 | Palmer | Jul 1998 | A |
5790260 | Myers | Aug 1998 | A |
5812134 | Pooser et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5813009 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5832460 | Bednar et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5839118 | Ryan et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5862325 | Reed | Jan 1999 | A |
5870721 | Norris | Feb 1999 | A |
5875431 | Heckman et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5875437 | Atkins | Feb 1999 | A |
5884288 | Chang et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5893079 | Cwenar | Apr 1999 | A |
5930759 | Moore et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930764 | Melchione et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930778 | Geer | Jul 1999 | A |
5943656 | Crooks et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5956691 | Powers | Sep 1999 | A |
5956700 | Landry | Sep 1999 | A |
5963925 | Kolling et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5966441 | Calamera | Oct 1999 | A |
5966700 | Gould et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5970476 | Fahey | Oct 1999 | A |
5978780 | Watson | Nov 1999 | A |
5983206 | Oppenheimer | Nov 1999 | A |
5987434 | Libman | Nov 1999 | A |
5991750 | Watson | Nov 1999 | A |
5991881 | Conklin et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995947 | Fraser et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6012047 | Mazonas | Jan 2000 | A |
6016482 | Molinari | Jan 2000 | A |
6018721 | Aziz et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018723 | Siegel et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6021202 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6023692 | Nichols | Feb 2000 | A |
6029887 | Furuhashi et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032133 | Hilt et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6035285 | Schlect et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6043819 | LeBrun et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044362 | Neely | Mar 2000 | A |
6049782 | Gottesman et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055505 | Elston | Apr 2000 | A |
6061515 | Chang | May 2000 | A |
6070150 | Remington et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070151 | Frankel | May 2000 | A |
6076072 | Libman | Jun 2000 | A |
6078905 | Pich-LeWinter | Jun 2000 | A |
6078907 | Lamm | Jun 2000 | A |
6081790 | Rosen | Jun 2000 | A |
6091893 | Fintel | Jul 2000 | A |
6105007 | Norris | Aug 2000 | A |
6119103 | Basch et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6119104 | Brumbelow et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6119107 | Polk | Sep 2000 | A |
6128599 | Walker et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6128603 | Dent et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6131810 | Weiss et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6138102 | Hinckley, Jr. | Oct 2000 | A |
6138130 | Adler | Oct 2000 | A |
6148293 | King | Nov 2000 | A |
6161098 | Wallman | Dec 2000 | A |
6182048 | Osborn et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185683 | Ginter et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6202053 | Christiansen et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6205434 | Ryan et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209095 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6223983 | Kjonaas et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6226623 | Schein | May 2001 | B1 |
6226624 | Waton et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233566 | Levine | May 2001 | B1 |
6237096 | Bisbee et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6249775 | Freeman | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6266054 | Lawton et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266666 | Ireland et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270457 | Bardy | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6275824 | O'Flaherty | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6279008 | Ng et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6292788 | Roberts | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301579 | Becker | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324541 | de l'Etraz et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6344855 | Fisher | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6345262 | Madden | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6366294 | Cunningham | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6367013 | Bisbee et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389588 | Wadhwa | May 2002 | B1 |
6401079 | Kahn | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6401085 | Gershman | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6460021 | Kirksey | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6549880 | Willoughby | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6584501 | Cartsonis | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6589721 | Arcus | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6614452 | Cable | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6615187 | Ashenmil et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6868525 | Szabo | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6901554 | Bahrs | May 2005 | B1 |
6904412 | Broadbent | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6957191 | Belcsak | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6970844 | Bierenbaum | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6988249 | Arvanitis | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7020631 | Freeman | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7020697 | Goodman | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7035820 | Goodwin et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7089503 | Bloomquist | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7107239 | Graff | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7181422 | Philip et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7246128 | Jordahl | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7305392 | Abrams | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7308388 | Beverina | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7313540 | Hueler et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7315841 | McDonald et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7337136 | Burns | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7340427 | Cornell | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7386507 | Davis et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7415471 | Coleman | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7443401 | Blanco | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7447659 | Parthasarthy | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7469227 | Breeden | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7523066 | Beggins | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7590617 | Voigt | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7599879 | Louie | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7720698 | Gulko | May 2010 | B1 |
7742966 | Erlanger | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7783562 | Ellis | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7801782 | DeAddio | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7860781 | Bodi | Dec 2010 | B1 |
8015091 | Ellis | Sep 2011 | B1 |
20010032084 | Day | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034701 | Fox | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010037287 | Broadbent et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047326 | Broadbent et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010054022 | Louie | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010056397 | Kelly | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020019804 | Sutton | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020029207 | Bakalash et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020038285 | Golden et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020046158 | Kelly | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020055905 | Jannah et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020138590 | Beams | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020178433 | Hodgson | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020188497 | Cerwin | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188556 | Colica et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030018558 | Heffner et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018563 | Kilgour et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030050884 | Barnett | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030058277 | Bowman-Amuah | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030076329 | Beda | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030083957 | Olefson | May 2003 | A1 |
20030084015 | Beams | May 2003 | A1 |
20030110073 | Briel | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030110464 | Davidson | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030126293 | Bushey | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135451 | O'Brien et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030144949 | Blanch | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030193517 | Cable | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030220870 | Bayrooti | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040019558 | McDonald et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040041812 | Roberts | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040090472 | Risch et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040130550 | Blanco | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050010504 | Gebhard et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050102225 | Oppenheimer et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20060095457 | Glasspool | May 2006 | A1 |
20070067229 | Parthasarathy | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20090221369 | Riopelle | Sep 2009 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Legacy Family Tree Genealogy Software: Features, Legacy 4.0 Family Tree, available at www.legacyfamilytree.com/Features.asp (accessed Aug. 2002). |
Legacy Family Tree Genealogy Software: Legacy Guided Tour, available at www.legacyfamilytree.com/Tour.asp (accessed Aug. 2002). |
Legacy Family Tree Genealogy Software: Tour Information Window, available at www.legacyfamilytree.com/TourInformation.asp (accessed Aug. 2002). |
Legacy Family Tree Genealogy Software: Tour GEDCOM Import, available at www.legacyfamilytree.com/TourImport.asp (accessed Aug. 2002). |
Reditus: Options Design & Pricing Platform, available at www.cmis.csiro.au/reditus/ (accessed Aug. 2002). |
Reditus: An Innovative Tool for Developing/Researching New Products, available at www.cmis.csiro.au/reditus/Presentation/Reditus—General.doc (accessed Aug. 2002). |
Reditus: A Manufacture & Trade Tool for New Financial Instruments, available at www.cmis.csiro.au/reditus/Presentation/ReditusGeneral.ppt (accessed Aug. 2002). |
Reditus: Monte-Carlo Engine, available at www.cmis.csiro.au/reditus/ModelDocuments/Reditus—brochure3.doc (accessed Aug. 2002). |
How to Set up a Simple Model From Scratch in Reditus (May 2001), available at www.cmls.csiro.au/reditus/ModelDocuments/StepByStepExample.doc (accessed Aug. 2002). |
Business Valuation and Deal Structure Software, Business ValueXpress, available at www.businessvaluexpress.com/seamless.asp (accessed Aug. 2002). |
Humanconcepts, LLC, The Industry Standard in Organization Charting, available at http://www.orgplus.com/ (accessed Aug. 2002). |
OrgPlus 4.0 Professional QuickStart Guide 2002, available at www.humanconcepts.com (accessed Aug. 2002). |
OrgPlus Quicktour, available at www.humanconcepts.com (accessed Aug. 2002). |
“Loan Securitization,” printed from http://www.mortgage-investments.com/Investment—in—mortgages/loan—securitization.htm, Internet site, accessed on Oct. 17, 2001, 1 page. |
“A Simplified Example of Small Business Loan Securitization,” printed from http://minneapolisfed.org/pubs/region/95-09/reg959-1.html, Internet site, accessed on Oct. 17, 2001, 1 page. |
“Defining Business Rules ˜ What Are They Really?” http://businessrulesgroup.org/first—paper/, Mar. 4, 2001. Date taken from www.archive.org. Archive page attached. |
Search Report on word mark “Enterprise” obtained from Trademark Electronic Search System (TESS), http://tess.uspto.gov, filed Jul. 12, 2000. |
Brochure “Zenetics company & product information,” Apr. 2001. |
Website “Business Rules and Mortgage Banking,” http://www.astera.com/CentMortgWP.html, accessed on Sep. 10, 2002. |
“Business Rules Primer,” obtained from http://www.astera.com accessed on Mar. 2000. |
“Enterprise Loan Management System” (CD-ROM) Dec. 2001. |
Inventorying. (n.d.). The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition. Retrieved Jun. 12, 2007, from Dictionary.com website: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/inventorying. |
Enterprise! Loan Management System, Version 3.3, CMBS Reporting Module—Product Summary, Updated December Midland Loan Services, 2001. |
Enterprise! Loan Management System, Version 3.3 Core System—Product Summary, Midland Loan Services. |
Enterprise! Loan Management System, Version 3.3 Life Insurance Accounting Module—Product Summary Midland Loan Services, Sep. 2001. |
State of Research and Development at Midland Loan Services, Midland Loan Services. |
Enterprise! (printout of video), Midland Loan Services. |
U.S. Appl No. 11/796,371, filed Apr. 27, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/140,621, filed Jun. 17, 2008. |
ZENetics, dual-sided, tri-fold brochure, Arlington, Texas, 2 pages. |
“Enterprise!” Univest Financial Group, LLC, Loan Management System Demo for CSSA Conference, Apr. 27, 1999. |
“Enterprise”, Version 3.2, Midland Loan Services. |
Shea, L, “Monitor an Enterprise of SQL Servers—Automating Management by Exception with Perl”, The 3rd Large Installation System Administration of Windows NT onference, Aug. 2000. Accessed Dec. 26, 2001 at http://www.usenix.org/events/lisa-nt2000/full—papers/shea/shea—html/. |
“Object/Relational Mapping using Generic Business Objects”, Difference between Generic Business Objects and Custom Business Objects, 4 pages. Accessed Dec. 31, 2001 at http://userserols.com/goldinj/mtos/gbos.html. |
Ambler S., “Object-Oriented Business Rules”, How to record the transactional logic behind UML object models, Software Development Online, Jun. 2000, 5 pages. Accessed Dec. 31, 2001 at http://www.sdmagazine.com/documents/s=743/sdm0006j/0006j.htm. |
Dr. Paul Dorsey, “Implementing Business Rules”, Dulcian, Inc., 1998, 12 pages. Accessed Dec. 31, 2001 at http://www.dulcian.com/papers/Implementing%20Business%20Rules.htm. |
“Project Horizon—Operation A to Z”, 9 pages, in Power Point form. |
“Midland Loan Services—E! PAAS Data Design”, 65 pages. |
“Data Dictionary”, Aug. 25, 2001, 131 pages. |
Office Action dated Feb. 20, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/140,621. |
Office Action dated Nov. 6, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/140,621. |
Office Action dated May 19, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/140,621. |
Office Action dated Feb. 3, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/140,621. |
Office Action dated Aug. 29, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/140,621. |
Office Action dated Feb. 27, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/140,621. |
“SS&C Technologies, Inc.—Markets: Real Estate: Loan Management,” printed from http://www.sscinc.com/markets/real—estate/default.asp?P=2, Internet site, accessed on Nov. 27, 2001, 1 page. |
“SS&C Technologies, Inc.—LMS: Screen Shots” “Report Screen Shot,” printed from http://www.sscinc.com/lms/screen—shots.asp?P=2 Internet site, accessed on Nov. 27, 2001, 1 page. |
“SS&C Technologies, Inc.—LMS: Screen Shots” “Investor Reporting Module-Pool Setup,” printed from http://www.sscinc.com/lms/screen—shots.asp?P=3, Internet site, accessed on Nov. 27, 2001, 1 page. |
“SS&C Technologies, Inc.—LMS: Screen Shots” “Collateral Management,” printed from http://www.sscinc.com/lms/screen—shots.asp?P=5, Internet site, accessed on Nov. 27, 2001, 1 page. |
“SS&C Technologies, Inc.—LMS: Screen Shots” “SnapShots Screen Shot” printed from http://www.sscinc.com/lms/screen—shots.asp?P=9, Internet site, accessed on Nov. 27, 2001, 1 page. |
Definition of “Associate ” Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary, (1913+1828)—The ARTFL Project,, 1913 edition, printed from http://machaut.uchicago.edu/?action=seach&word=associate&resource=Webster%27s&q, Internet site, accessed on Feb. 17, 2009, 3 pages. |
Midland Loan Services advertising tri-fold pocket folder, Overland Park, Kansas, Sep. 2002, 8 pages. |